I was so impressed at 22:28. Yes, this is not an episode of Doctor Who, that's why we don't get an intro. This was the show taking the unreliable narrator concept to the absolute extreme - we just watched someone tell a story that has the Doctor IN it, but it's not a Doctor Who story, He explains that the signal is the important thing, and that the story was deliberately desgined to make you watch - none of it has to be 'real'. Personally, it's one of my absolute favourite episodes. I love unreliable narrator stories ("Last Christmas" was another favourite) and there are so many amazing touches. You mentioned the fact that we keep watching through the eyes of the characters and breaking the fourth wall. You mentioned that the character of the Doctor in this story is like someone else writing it. It's a reasonable, average Doctor Who story - with higher level storytelling and concept. Reaction channels never 'get' this episode, and it tends to get really badly trashed by most of them. Thank you for getting it.
- What episode is this? :) We all had this question. I’ll immediately remove from the story those people who didn’t like the episode, everything is clear here, I’ll tell you about a different audience. Their opinion: - God, what an unusual, creative and brave episode! This is so bad that it's even good! (Hysterical laughter) Respect to the author for trying to introduce something radically different, the plot let us down, but the idea and style are interesting. - Do you like this stupid episode? So you'll give it the highest rating? - No, we will give the worst rating, 4, no 3! - Wait, but you liked him, why do you give such a low score? - So that no one accidentally watches it! :D (Hysterical laughter), in the video itself it says at the beginning "Don't watch this video!", this will be the episode with the lowest rating, haha! There are simply people who watch an episode based on ratings and perhaps they have never watched a single episode of Doctor Who, I wouldn’t want a new viewer to come across this episode and they accidentally start their acquaintance with Doctor Who from this episode, it’s better for anyone to watch different episode than this one, haha! I loved this episode but it gets the lowest possible score from me hahahaha! This is the case when you don’t feel sorry and give a low score with a smile! It will be the lowest rated and we don’t mind, we don’t feel sorry at all))) - Strange logic... - There were bad episodes, yes. But the worst one makes us smile, this usually doesn’t happen, but here it’s somehow calm in the soul, the worst one with a twist hahaha :D _ We love this episode for two other reasons. 1) The doctor lost. The first episode, where the Doctor loses - It was exciting and interesting, yes, he changed the route of the ship, but he could not defeat the villains themselves, he had to escape from the ship. 2) Meme. There is a meme with Capaldi, in the picture Capaldi is looking at the camera with tousled hair and wide-eyed, his quote is subtitled - Dust was following us! - And the meme title at the top: When you're an experienced paranoid :D _ Note: This episode has one more feature, I described above that there are people who liked the episode for its absurdity, what else is it so attractive? Because it's an absurdly bad episode that makes it fun to watch the reactions to. Imagine, people are waiting for the reactor to get to this episode, just to laugh at how he will watch and react to this funny nonsense and also utter the phrase “What I just watched, this is definitely Doctor Who?!”, "What episode is this?!", people like it, laugh and get carried away , such a pleasure of mocking such a bad episode when someone else is already starting to watch it :D DON'T WATCH THIS VIDEO! (Song: Nanana-nananana-nanana-na-na) :D PS: For me this episode is bad, but I like it, it makes me smile. It rarely happens in life that we like an episode because it is bad. - How do you like this episode? - He's terrible! :D - Then why are you smiling? - Because I like him :D - Since you smile, it means he’s not so bad, you think he’s good. - No! :D - You just said that you like it. - Yes, I like it :D - So it's a good episode for you. - No! :D - Then I don’t understand why you smile when this is a very bad episode?! - It's hard to explain :D - Stop making stupid hysterical laughter! - (I continue to laugh hysterically). - Okay, then I’ll find out why it’s bad, I’ll go watch it and find the reason why this episode is bad, maybe they’re showing something nasty, or maybe there’s a hole in the plot. - Good luck!... Good luck trying to somehow find the right words to try to explain what you watched :D
Personally, I don't accept the 'so bad it's good' idea, but i do agree that one of the best things about this story is that the Doctor loses - he admits defeat, gets in the box, and just gets out of there - and that's such a rare value in a story where just a few seasons before he was being literally described in the story as a god. But I think it's a fantastic episode. Beautifully made. Inventive. Perfectly paced. The right balance of humour and horror. It's a good episode. It's not a good story that fails in the delivery (like "Fear Her") or a well-delivered story with a flawed premise (like "Kill the Moon") - it's a well-made episode that technically succeeds while doing something new and inventive. It gets bad ratings (on things like IMDB, etc.) because people generally fail to get the point of the story. They think it's a story about eye-gunk monsters.
@@ДаняШиряев-п6е for me, it's a 9 out of 10 story. I love unreliable narrator stories. I love found footage stories. I love twist endings. I love episodes where the Doctor doesn't win (so, for example, while I know the first half of this season's Zygon story is considered a bit of a weak point, I love the fact that it leaves off with the Doctor absolutely falling apart on every front) and I love episodes that break the mould. So the Classic episode "Earthshock" was one of my favourite Doctor Who stories of all time, for example (I won't give any spoilers) - because it ticked so many of the boxes.
@@MichaelJohnson-kq7qg You didn't understand me :D I heard your opinion, I just voiced mine, that even if for me this episode was 9 out of 10, I would still give it a 3, and maybe I’ll give it an even lower rating if it suddenly starts gaining ratings. :) The episode will still find its fans. :) My logic is this - an entertaining episode, but it’s better for it to be invisible and let it be at the very bottom of the ratings, and I say this with love. This is the paradox when a person who liked it deliberately gives a low rating.
This episode re-united League of Gentlemen writers/cast members Mark Gatiss who wrote it and Reece Shearsmith, who plays Rasmussen. LOG was originally a radio comedy later adapted for television. It was set in the fictional small town of Royston Vasey and the cast play multiple characters in a dark, often surreal sitcom which some may consider to be 'bad taste' these days. Gatiss is a big Dr Who fan himself, having written The Idiots Lantern episode & later playing Lazarus. I always thought the sets in this looked familiar, possible re-dress of the underwater base in Before the Flood.
I think this episode suffers a lot from being sandwiched between the episode everyone remembers for the Doctor's amazing war speech and the final episodes of this season.
Nor for a lot of people, but I love thus episode. It takes the unreliable narator to the extreme where what you're watching isn't what you think it is.
Absolutely. And I know t's a cliche to say "they just didn't get it", but when most people's complaint about the epsiode is that there are eye-dust monsters... they actually really didn't get it.
IMPORTANT! I said that I would speak in advance three times, according to the reached episode of Patreon, the second time was about the finale of season 8, here it is finally the third and last time when I am ahead of time. You've finally reached the Christmas edition. Now you have a choice, an important choice! Continue watching... or take a short break for a week? And react and rewatch the episode “Silence in the Library” with David Tennant and River Song, and only then continue to watch the current show. Half the reactors did this. You can delight viewers with a new reaction to an old episode. You might be wondering, what's the point of reacting to an episode you've already seen? Who will be interested in watching this? Believe me, viewers often watched both versions, the reaction before and after, it’s very exciting, especially to hear your comment with a new look after the end of her story and perhaps this time you will be visited by new emotions. I remember when you watched it for the first time and she died, you said how will you see her if she dies now? You then did not understand anything about how its line works, but then you realized that they do not move linearly in time and it took you a long time to get used to understanding this, but now you understand everything and this work can now be seen from a new interesting angle and view. It's like a book, the first time you read the work for the first time, but the second time, when you are older and already aware of the history, you re-read it and notice something that you had not noticed before and this work now looks from a new angle. Now you will have the focus not on the Doctor, but on River Song, and secondly, you will be able to evaluate her acting, did she cope well or poorly with her role? Did she play it right for future episodes without knowing what her character was like? Did she cope with her task? All her words and emotions will not be secret and mysterious to you, but will evoke nostalgia for everything she went through. Watching her talk to the Doctor, whom she knows very well, just as well as we do, which gives us the feeling that we are right now where the river song is and we are looking through her eyes at the Doctor, who still does not understand or know anything. I don't think any series had the potential or reason to ever respond to an episode again, but this is an interesting concept that, due to its unusual origins of non-linearity, allows for it and makes sense. At first we looked from left to right, but now we can look at the plot with eyes from right to left. Nicole, think about it. :) Yes, this pause may seem tedious, but why should it be tedious? The episode is good, an interesting concept and there is a meaning and a reason for this, especially since this is the final episode of the story, in addition, Doctor Who has proven more than once that you want to watch it again and again... so there’s rather another question here: won’t you regret it later? haven't done this before? Without keeping as a souvenir your two reactions “BEFORE” and “AFTER”? The first time you did the “Silence in the Library” reaction, you were perplexed by the death of River Song, let’s see what emotions wash over you now. I just warned you in a timely manner that some reactors do this with regards to this particular episode. The choice is yours.
Thank you for warning me. "Unfortunately" I have just watched the library episodes, on the German rewatch with my boyfriend. I will think about your comment, but please don´t be disappointed if I do decide otherwise. :)
There may be no legal obligation for the BBC to show an opening sequence (provided they mark when the program started). I know that Sci-fi comedy Red Dwarf started 2 episodes with just the series logo & did the credit text under the scene, in order to give that time to script.
This episode feels like an unfinished episode (no intro, no solution, no ending). I know they wanted it to feel unresolved in the end but it was entirely unsatisfying. The ending is so abrupt because they ended up being trapped in the "found footage" structure. Could have put a bow on it with just a single line of dialogue from Clara or the Doctor after they escape in the TARDIS, but they couldn't do that because of this story telling method. Plus, not a fan of the "eye dust" creatures.
"Sleep No Bore" should had been the main title of this episode. I mean i understand what they were trying to do and i admire they wanted to try something different and go for something experimental such as camera footage and such and such i do love the horror episodes of Dr. Who but this isn't one of them. I don't like we had Dr. Who without the opening theme it felt abnormal to me. Don't worry i think almost everyone including the fans were confused what was going on.
Yes please, please do upload Face the Raven!!! I actually only subscribed to your perks because I'm so impatuiemt to see that episode and you'r so lovely but you did upload a placejholder suggestinf its was there (ok for a month's subscription of £2.99 it's hardly a rip-off and the cost of what? A packet of gum these days? You need help with your value-add vs pricing but I digress) ... It's all about raising expectations, you know? Can you imagine my dissapointment when I, in all good faith, excitedly clicked after subscribing and ... noope!!! It was a delight to see you react to the amazing Zygon speech - always a tear jerker but, honestly, it's like you set up Xmas Eve and got me all excited than told me Santa hadn't been in the morning bafter all! I know that you are a busy person working in professional services no less ( me too) and that yoi probably often work almost illegal hours but please, please ... going fwds, either promise and deliver or just don't promise. I write a LOT btw so do not misinterpret my verbosity for any sort of negativity excepted that of, again to use the xmas metaphoe, a child crying on xmas morning. 😢😈🎅🤣
Hi thank you for your comment, and I´m sorry that you have been disappointed. But if I understand you correctly you are subscribed to the "TARDIS Supporters"-Tier, right? That means you do get 1 week in advance of everybody else. It says it in the Tier-Description. If you do subscribe to the "Doctors Supporters"-Tier you do get one week more (2 weeks in advance) which means you will be able to watch the Raven video this week already. In the first tier it will be available next week Thursday or Friday. :) I hope I explained it well :) And thank you for your support. :)
@@nicologikreacts OOOOh OK! Thank you and apologies for my misunderstanding but as I've probably made clear I'm not the most patient sort. I'll reread the guidance .. and meanwhile, thank you so much for your authenticity as a reactor and the pain and tears you put yourself through (always worth it in the end btw). There is such a difference between those who are really enchanted by this show or real "Whovians" and those who are clearly cashing in and just don't get it but pretend to. To me. Oh and , controversially, don't worry if you don't entiterly "get" Classic Who - as a child I hated it because, ironically, seeing Doctor of the times big dumb face was a reminder that he replaced The Muppet Show slot!! 🤣 100% true story. I was like "where's my first love, Miss Piggy?" 😥 I shall never forgive him (McCoy specifically). I'm a NuWhovian though thru and thru and proud of it. Peter and Michelele are actually the pair that secured my conviction there!!🌂☂. #laughhardrunfastbekind4eva!!! xxx
"I'm safe, right here." Are you? They've 'broken' your heart a few times now. *looks at Patreon* This past month especially. You shouldn't have challenged.
@@AlmightyCRJ oh, you're right. For some reason I read this as if there was stuff going on IRL I wasn't aware of. I'm glad everything is fine. But you are definitely right, the next few episodes are an experience to be sure.
You should change your Tardis background. Peter Capaldi’s Tardis is my favorite of them all so far, though Ncuti Gatwa’s Tardis is looking pretty good too.
@@richardvinsen2385no it's not that ! You litterally said the name of a future actor who play the Doctor ! She don't want to know any hints or tease from the future. You need to remove that name.
I think this is my favourite Gatiss episode (but that's not saying much since he is probably my least favourite recurring writer), but I think Fear Her is incredibly overhated, so I'd much rather watch Fear Her again than this.
Too much of this episode felt like it was cobbled together from generic sci-fi action movies. I didn't find the characters to be engaging, either. So for me, this is a weak story, weakly told. And unfortunately it comes right after one of the very best New Who episodes! 2.5 out of 5
Garbage episode, sleep in your eye becomes a monster.... seriously if i was the show runner and someone seriously came up with that idea i would say "there's the door hack fraud, see ya"....pen and paper ..write anything....best they can do?
the problem is you keep mistaking doctor who for a kids programme. it's not a kids programme. the show is PG-13 meaning teenagers/ young adults and normal legal adults 18 +
There are 2 weeks left until the wait for the masterpiece! [3]
I was so impressed at 22:28. Yes, this is not an episode of Doctor Who, that's why we don't get an intro. This was the show taking the unreliable narrator concept to the absolute extreme - we just watched someone tell a story that has the Doctor IN it, but it's not a Doctor Who story, He explains that the signal is the important thing, and that the story was deliberately desgined to make you watch - none of it has to be 'real'. Personally, it's one of my absolute favourite episodes. I love unreliable narrator stories ("Last Christmas" was another favourite) and there are so many amazing touches. You mentioned the fact that we keep watching through the eyes of the characters and breaking the fourth wall. You mentioned that the character of the Doctor in this story is like someone else writing it. It's a reasonable, average Doctor Who story - with higher level storytelling and concept. Reaction channels never 'get' this episode, and it tends to get really badly trashed by most of them. Thank you for getting it.
I answered above
- What episode is this? :)
We all had this question.
I’ll immediately remove from the story those people who didn’t like the episode, everything is clear here, I’ll tell you about a different audience.
Their opinion:
- God, what an unusual, creative and brave episode! This is so bad that it's even good! (Hysterical laughter) Respect to the author for trying to introduce something radically different, the plot let us down, but the idea and style are interesting.
- Do you like this stupid episode? So you'll give it the highest rating?
- No, we will give the worst rating, 4, no 3!
- Wait, but you liked him, why do you give such a low score?
- So that no one accidentally watches it! :D (Hysterical laughter), in the video itself it says at the beginning "Don't watch this video!", this will be the episode with the lowest rating, haha! There are simply people who watch an episode based on ratings and perhaps they have never watched a single episode of Doctor Who, I wouldn’t want a new viewer to come across this episode and they accidentally start their acquaintance with Doctor Who from this episode, it’s better for anyone to watch different episode than this one, haha! I loved this episode but it gets the lowest possible score from me hahahaha! This is the case when you don’t feel sorry and give a low score with a smile! It will be the lowest rated and we don’t mind, we don’t feel sorry at all)))
- Strange logic...
- There were bad episodes, yes. But the worst one makes us smile, this usually doesn’t happen, but here it’s somehow calm in the soul, the worst one with a twist hahaha :D
_
We love this episode for two other reasons.
1) The doctor lost.
The first episode, where the Doctor loses - It was exciting and interesting, yes, he changed the route of the ship, but he could not defeat the villains themselves, he had to escape from the ship.
2) Meme.
There is a meme with Capaldi, in the picture Capaldi is looking at the camera with tousled hair and wide-eyed, his quote is subtitled - Dust was following us! - And the meme title at the top: When you're an experienced paranoid :D
_
Note: This episode has one more feature, I described above that there are people who liked the episode for its absurdity, what else is it so attractive? Because it's an absurdly bad episode that makes it fun to watch the reactions to. Imagine, people are waiting for the reactor to get to this episode, just to laugh at how he will watch and react to this funny nonsense and also utter the phrase “What I just watched, this is definitely Doctor Who?!”, "What episode is this?!", people like it, laugh and get carried away , such a pleasure of mocking such a bad episode when someone else is already starting to watch it :D
DON'T WATCH THIS VIDEO! (Song: Nanana-nananana-nanana-na-na) :D
PS: For me this episode is bad, but I like it, it makes me smile. It rarely happens in life that we like an episode because it is bad.
- How do you like this episode?
- He's terrible! :D
- Then why are you smiling?
- Because I like him :D
- Since you smile, it means he’s not so bad, you think he’s good.
- No! :D
- You just said that you like it.
- Yes, I like it :D
- So it's a good episode for you.
- No! :D
- Then I don’t understand why you smile when this is a very bad episode?!
- It's hard to explain :D
- Stop making stupid hysterical laughter!
- (I continue to laugh hysterically).
- Okay, then I’ll find out why it’s bad, I’ll go watch it and find the reason why this episode is bad, maybe they’re showing something nasty, or maybe there’s a hole in the plot.
- Good luck!... Good luck trying to somehow find the right words to try to explain what you watched :D
Personally, I don't accept the 'so bad it's good' idea, but i do agree that one of the best things about this story is that the Doctor loses - he admits defeat, gets in the box, and just gets out of there - and that's such a rare value in a story where just a few seasons before he was being literally described in the story as a god.
But I think it's a fantastic episode. Beautifully made. Inventive. Perfectly paced. The right balance of humour and horror. It's a good episode.
It's not a good story that fails in the delivery (like "Fear Her") or a well-delivered story with a flawed premise (like "Kill the Moon") - it's a well-made episode that technically succeeds while doing something new and inventive.
It gets bad ratings (on things like IMDB, etc.) because people generally fail to get the point of the story. They think it's a story about eye-gunk monsters.
@@MichaelJohnson-kq7qg i love this episode, But I gave it a 3 rating. :) Just in case.
@@ДаняШиряев-п6е for me, it's a 9 out of 10 story. I love unreliable narrator stories. I love found footage stories. I love twist endings. I love episodes where the Doctor doesn't win (so, for example, while I know the first half of this season's Zygon story is considered a bit of a weak point, I love the fact that it leaves off with the Doctor absolutely falling apart on every front) and I love episodes that break the mould.
So the Classic episode "Earthshock" was one of my favourite Doctor Who stories of all time, for example (I won't give any spoilers) - because it ticked so many of the boxes.
@@MichaelJohnson-kq7qg You didn't understand me :D
I heard your opinion, I just voiced mine, that even if for me this episode was 9 out of 10, I would still give it a 3, and maybe I’ll give it an even lower rating if it suddenly starts gaining ratings. :)
The episode will still find its fans. :)
My logic is this - an entertaining episode, but it’s better for it to be invisible and let it be at the very bottom of the ratings, and I say this with love. This is the paradox when a person who liked it deliberately gives a low rating.
@@ДаняШиряев-п6е I don't understand the deliberately low rating. I'm just saying, for me, this is peak Who.
This episode re-united League of Gentlemen writers/cast members Mark Gatiss who wrote it and Reece Shearsmith, who plays Rasmussen. LOG was originally a radio comedy later adapted for television. It was set in the fictional small town of Royston Vasey and the cast play multiple characters in a dark, often surreal sitcom which some may consider to be 'bad taste' these days. Gatiss is a big Dr Who fan himself, having written The Idiots Lantern episode & later playing Lazarus. I always thought the sets in this looked familiar, possible re-dress of the underwater base in Before the Flood.
I think this episode suffers a lot from being sandwiched between the episode everyone remembers for the Doctor's amazing war speech and the final episodes of this season.
Nor for a lot of people, but I love thus episode. It takes the unreliable narator to the extreme where what you're watching isn't what you think it is.
Absolutely. And I know t's a cliche to say "they just didn't get it", but when most people's complaint about the epsiode is that there are eye-dust monsters... they actually really didn't get it.
IMPORTANT!
I said that I would speak in advance three times, according to the reached episode of Patreon, the second time was about the finale of season 8, here it is finally the third and last time when I am ahead of time.
You've finally reached the Christmas edition.
Now you have a choice, an important choice! Continue watching... or take a short break for a week? And react and rewatch the episode “Silence in the Library” with David Tennant and River Song, and only then continue to watch the current show.
Half the reactors did this. You can delight viewers with a new reaction to an old episode.
You might be wondering, what's the point of reacting to an episode you've already seen? Who will be interested in watching this?
Believe me, viewers often watched both versions, the reaction before and after, it’s very exciting, especially to hear your comment with a new look after the end of her story and perhaps this time you will be visited by new emotions.
I remember when you watched it for the first time and she died, you said how will you see her if she dies now? You then did not understand anything about how its line works, but then you realized that they do not move linearly in time and it took you a long time to get used to understanding this, but now you understand everything and this work can now be seen from a new interesting angle and view.
It's like a book, the first time you read the work for the first time, but the second time, when you are older and already aware of the history, you re-read it and notice something that you had not noticed before and this work now looks from a new angle.
Now you will have the focus not on the Doctor, but on River Song, and secondly, you will be able to evaluate her acting, did she cope well or poorly with her role? Did she play it right for future episodes without knowing what her character was like? Did she cope with her task? All her words and emotions will not be secret and mysterious to you, but will evoke nostalgia for everything she went through.
Watching her talk to the Doctor, whom she knows very well, just as well as we do, which gives us the feeling that we are right now where the river song is and we are looking through her eyes at the Doctor, who still does not understand or know anything.
I don't think any series had the potential or reason to ever respond to an episode again, but this is an interesting concept that, due to its unusual origins of non-linearity, allows for it and makes sense. At first we looked from left to right, but now we can look at the plot with eyes from right to left.
Nicole, think about it. :)
Yes, this pause may seem tedious, but why should it be tedious? The episode is good, an interesting concept and there is a meaning and a reason for this, especially since this is the final episode of the story, in addition, Doctor Who has proven more than once that you want to watch it again and again... so there’s rather another question here: won’t you regret it later? haven't done this before? Without keeping as a souvenir your two reactions “BEFORE” and “AFTER”? The first time you did the “Silence in the Library” reaction, you were perplexed by the death of River Song, let’s see what emotions wash over you now.
I just warned you in a timely manner that some reactors do this with regards to this particular episode.
The choice is yours.
Thank you for warning me. "Unfortunately" I have just watched the library episodes, on the German rewatch with my boyfriend. I will think about your comment, but please don´t be disappointed if I do decide otherwise. :)
It wasn't the greatest episode but I liked that it tried to do something different with the format.
There may be no legal obligation for the BBC to show an opening sequence (provided they mark when the program started).
I know that Sci-fi comedy Red Dwarf started 2 episodes with just the series logo & did the credit text under the scene, in order to give that time to script.
This episode feels like an unfinished episode (no intro, no solution, no ending). I know they wanted it to feel unresolved in the end but it was entirely unsatisfying. The ending is so abrupt because they ended up being trapped in the "found footage" structure. Could have put a bow on it with just a single line of dialogue from Clara or the Doctor after they escape in the TARDIS, but they couldn't do that because of this story telling method. Plus, not a fan of the "eye dust" creatures.
There are no eye dust creatures.
"Sleep No Bore" should had been the main title of this episode.
I mean i understand what they were trying to do and i admire they wanted to try something different and go for something experimental such as camera footage and such and such i do love the horror episodes of Dr. Who but this isn't one of them.
I don't like we had Dr. Who without the opening theme it felt abnormal to me.
Don't worry i think almost everyone including the fans were confused what was going on.
This episode was.... an experiment.
We don't talk about this episode.
Yeah, this one sucked maybe. Next ones are better. But I'm ngl, I still get goosebumps at this ending. It's scary and very well done.
Rewatching this episode made it better for me, still not a favorite of mine though.
Yes please, please do upload Face the Raven!!! I actually only subscribed to your perks because I'm so impatuiemt to see that episode and you'r so lovely but you did upload a placejholder suggestinf its was there (ok for a month's subscription of £2.99 it's hardly a rip-off and the cost of what? A packet of gum these days? You need help with your value-add vs pricing but I digress) ... It's all about raising expectations, you know? Can you imagine my dissapointment when I, in all good faith, excitedly clicked after subscribing and ... noope!!! It was a delight to see you react to the amazing Zygon speech - always a tear jerker but, honestly, it's like you set up Xmas Eve and got me all excited than told me Santa hadn't been in the morning bafter all! I know that you are a busy person working in professional services no less ( me too) and that yoi probably often work almost illegal hours but please, please ... going fwds, either promise and deliver or just don't promise. I write a LOT btw so do not misinterpret my verbosity for any sort of negativity excepted that of, again to use the xmas metaphoe, a child crying on xmas morning. 😢😈🎅🤣
Hi thank you for your comment, and I´m sorry that you have been disappointed. But if I understand you correctly you are subscribed to the "TARDIS Supporters"-Tier, right? That means you do get 1 week in advance of everybody else. It says it in the Tier-Description. If you do subscribe to the "Doctors Supporters"-Tier you do get one week more (2 weeks in advance) which means you will be able to watch the Raven video this week already. In the first tier it will be available next week Thursday or Friday. :) I hope I explained it well :) And thank you for your support. :)
@@nicologikreacts OOOOh OK! Thank you and apologies for my misunderstanding but as I've probably made clear I'm not the most patient sort. I'll reread the guidance .. and meanwhile, thank you so much for your authenticity as a reactor and the pain and tears you put yourself through (always worth it in the end btw). There is such a difference between those who are really enchanted by this show or real "Whovians" and those who are clearly cashing in and just don't get it but pretend to. To me. Oh and , controversially, don't worry if you don't entiterly "get" Classic Who - as a child I hated it because, ironically, seeing Doctor of the times big dumb face was a reminder that he replaced The Muppet Show slot!! 🤣 100% true story. I was like "where's my first love, Miss Piggy?" 😥 I shall never forgive him (McCoy specifically). I'm a NuWhovian though thru and thru and proud of it. Peter and Michelele are actually the pair that secured my conviction there!!🌂☂. #laughhardrunfastbekind4eva!!! xxx
"I'm safe, right here." Are you? They've 'broken' your heart a few times now.
*looks at Patreon* This past month especially. You shouldn't have challenged.
I don't understand what this means
@@sparkingmarnie My definition of 'Safe' does not include the trauma of a good drama series & season finales particularly style around loss & change.
@@AlmightyCRJ oh, you're right. For some reason I read this as if there was stuff going on IRL I wasn't aware of. I'm glad everything is fine. But you are definitely right, the next few episodes are an experience to be sure.
Can't watch the face the raven upload, doesn't load so you know 😊
I'm sorry... Maybe it wasn't finished with the whole upload yet. Is it working now? Otherwise I'll upload it again today. 😊
@@nicologikreacts still not loading so may need to try reupload as I'm just getting an image atm when I click it 😊
Wait you still can´t watch it? That´s so strange. Other people were able to watch the episode. Maybe try another browser?
It’s not available Wdym
You should change your Tardis background. Peter Capaldi’s Tardis is my favorite of them all so far, though Ncuti Gatwa’s Tardis is looking pretty good too.
Spoiler
Can you stop putting spoilers in all of your comment ?
She really don't want to know that, you need to edited out that.
DUDE, don't spoil future Doctors.
@@arkthegreenwolfx3627 Every Doctor gets a new Tardis. It’s hardly a spoiler to say I like a future Doctor’s Tardis.
@@richardvinsen2385no it's not that ! You litterally said the name of a future actor who play the Doctor !
She don't want to know any hints or tease from the future. You need to remove that name.
You spelt this wrong 😂
Haha true :)
I think this is my favourite Gatiss episode (but that's not saying much since he is probably my least favourite recurring writer), but I think Fear Her is incredibly overhated, so I'd much rather watch Fear Her again than this.
Too much of this episode felt like it was cobbled together from generic sci-fi action movies. I didn't find the characters to be engaging, either. So for me, this is a weak story, weakly told. And unfortunately it comes right after one of the very best New Who episodes! 2.5 out of 5
Garbage episode, sleep in your eye becomes a monster.... seriously if i was the show runner and someone seriously came up with that idea i would say "there's the door hack fraud, see ya"....pen and paper ..write anything....best they can do?
You might want to watch the episode again. There are no sleep monsters.
@@MichaelJohnson-kq7qg no thanks never watching this garbage again
@@phantomsidious2934 entirely your choice. You have missed the point, though.
@@MichaelJohnson-kq7qg don't care
@@phantomsidious2934 which is fine. But weird that you felt the need to explain.
It's okay to like what you like, friend.
the problem is you keep mistaking doctor who for a kids programme. it's not a kids programme. the show is PG-13 meaning teenagers/ young adults and normal legal adults 18 +
It's made for families, with the expectation that younger children will be watching with their parents (or whoever).
@@andrewgwilliam4831 that didn't quite debunk my argument . yes kids will be in the room sometimes BUT THE SHOWS NOT MADE FOR THEM😊😊
I do know that it´s a family show. And that means kids will be in the room, watching those episodes with their parents. That´s what I meant.
@@nicologikreacts no worries we're not fighting we're just having a conversation😊😊
Yeah this wasn’t the greatest episode.
This episode is so bad you misspelled the video title
Haha :D