"PhD Biologist Rejects Evolutionary Doctrine" -They are teaching this stuff to kids? Watch this!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 май 2024
- Welcome to an eye-opening journey where we uncover the controversial stance of a renowned PhD biologist who boldly rejects Darwinian evolution.
Discover the compelling arguments and groundbreaking evidence that challenge the conventional teachings we've all heard in school. This video is a must-watch for anyone curious about the origins of life and the ongoing debate in the scientific community.
Dr Standish has a Bachelor's in Biology, a Masters in Zoology, a PHD in Environmental Biology and Public Policy. He is a professor in biology and has lectured all around the world.
🌟 Subscribe for more thought-provoking videos! Don't forget to hit the bell icon to stay updated on our latest content.
👍 Share this video with as many people as possible to spark meaningful discussions!
💬 Comment below with your thoughts and opinions - we love hearing from you! Please keep comments respectful! Thank you.
🙏 Support us with a Super Thanks donation to help us continue bringing you high-quality, informative content.
Together, let's explore the depths of science and challenge the status quo!
#ScienceDebate #EvolutionVsCreation #DarwinControversy #PhDBiologist #EvolutionMyths #ScientificDiscussion #ChallengingDarwin #ScienceTruth #BiologyDebate #EvolutionDebunked #Biblically #Sounddoctrine
#FrankTurek #Biblical #prophecy #christian #genesis #Bible
#ScienceRevolution #BiologyFacts #OriginsOfLife #ScientificEvidence
#BreakingScience #God #Scripture #truth #Searchingforanswers #Racism #Hitler #CriticalThinking #SubscribeForMore
Background music by: I Am a Man Who Will Fight for Your Honor by Chris Zabriskie is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. creativecommons.org/licenses/... 
Развлечения
People will believe what they want, even when faced with evidence!
Interesting. What are your conclusions? *Don't forget to like and subscribe to the channel for more content. Thanks friend!!!
Atheist cult leader Richard Dawkins said no amount of evidence would convince him that God is real... m.ruclips.net/video/J8BYcBD52Nc/видео.html
It really depends on the "Evidence" The sell for some "Evidence" across all disciines can be better than the "evidence"
@@anilkanda611 Hint: The man who is literally in the act of ignoring and denying the scientific evidence isn't talking about "evidence" - he's talking about his false religious beliefs, and then ignoring and denying science on the very basis of his false religious beliefs.
There's also the point that any person who uses rhetoric based on denying the very existence of religious believers making up bogus pseudoscience claims, in trying to pretend that their false religious beliefs are "scientific" while in fact they aren't scientific at all, to try to promote their particular religious beliefs, are already in denial of reality. We KNOW that religious believers engage in pseudoscience to try to promote their false religious claims. This is a fact of the world today. These religion-based pseudoscience promoters exist among Christians, Muslims, Hindus, Mormons, and so on. So every time any religion-based pseudoscience promoters employs rhetoric based on pretending that such religion-based pseudoscience promotors don't even exist, we know he's already off on the wrong foot, factually, because of reality.
The conclusions of people who know how to accept reality and think rationally, at least to some decent measure, are that religious propagandists using bogus pseudoscience claims about their particular religious beliefs, who use all manner of disingenuous rhetoric to try to justify their religious rhetoric while never actually addressing any actual scientific research published in any actual professional science journal on the planet, are engaged in nothing more than religion-based pseudoscience.
And the very fact that you cannot and will not even acknowledge this single obvious fact is just another example of how disingenuous your rhetoric really is.
@@steveg1961 Hint: Much of what you stated can be sheeted straight back at science, education etc.
The Good Dr clearly demonstrated exactly this when he showed the drawings of foetuses that ANYONE with knowledge KNOWS for a FACT are FALSE, WRONG, FANTASY and a myriad of other words.
Why, IF SCIENCE and Education are based solely on facts and data as YOU claim, are these fraudulent drawings still accepted by science and education authorities and taught to all schoolchildren who attend Public Education facilities?
Why, are the students NOT told they are fraudulent but still taught that they are EVIDENCE of Evolution?
I could list dozens of such examples such as the Big Bang, the size of the universe, the theory of thermo-dynamics etc but do not wish to write a book.
ALL sections of society are guilty of promoting THEIR truth yet YOU only chose Religion to attack whilst essentially championing science and Education.
I could also give examples of theory taught to many different trades apprentices that do NOT work in practise as they are described to work in theory and again, even when this is demonstrated and proven to those in power within these trades etc they REFUSE to change their theory books.
You made a mistake championing science and education when these are two of the most perverted of all by the almighty $.
As they say donate enough money and science will prove whatever you desire it to prove as evidenced by scientists that produced reports championing cigarette smoking even extolling the myriad of benefits from smoking tobacco and this is the discipline you set as your shining light of truth.
What's with the eerie music, too distracting!
It's not crazy loud. *Don't forget to like and subscribe to the channel for more content. Thanks friend!!!
@@anilkanda611it is distracting nonetheless. Up to u if u want ur viewers distracted.
@@anilkanda611 Always feel like I'm being emotionally manipulated when the low level abstract music is in the background - very annoying. Otherwise, good show!
I would also recommend to leave it.
🙄
interresting,
but the backdrop music is like annoying white noise
thanks for the feedback. no more music lol.*Don't forget to like and subscribe for more content! Thanks friend!
Who thought it was a good idea to add the music. I left as it started. Pity.
Pity. *Don't forget to like and subscribe for more content! Thanks friend!
That is not why you left
Its not the teachers, but rather the system. DNA does not allow for new information that can change its code beyond its scope. This is why evolution, macro, to be specific does not exist nor has been observed.
Can you provide a definition of evolution?
Insertion, deletion, substitution, duplication, etc are all events that have been observed to change and add new DNA information.
Yes!*Don't forget to like and subscribe to the channel for more content. Thanks friend!!!
What is its scope?
Breeding for traits is the only thing that happens among humans.
Evolution was disproved when we mapped DNA.
We just have many who won't accept that we are becoming lesser and lesser copies of our species.
The only evolving will be when we get our glorified bodies.
Love, the topic of the video.Can't stand that screeching background music
It's not that loud. LOL.*Don't forget to like and subscribe to the channel for more content. Thanks friend!!!
I understand what the person is saying that talks about the backround music... The gentleman that is talking to the public message is so interesting that the backround is a distractiin of the message. Give the message and leave the out any diatractionon the backround Thanks for the message if this video
@katjamusiek40 that is exactly what I'm saying
At no point did he present any evidence demonstrating that evolutionary theory is based in any lies. He starts with attacking various strawmen philosophies supposedly borne from evolutionary theory (while ignoring competing philosophies from people who also accept evolution), which tells us nothing about the veracity of evolution, only the dangers of some philosophies.
He does come close to addressing evolution with Haeckel's embryos. Unfortunately, this was either a demonstration of his ignorance or his dishonesty, as those drawings are *not* taught as an important piece of evidence for evolution. I just grabbed my 20-year-old copy of Evolutionary Analysis, and not only are those illustrations nowhere to be found, but they have instead been replaced by actual photographs of embryos at various stages of development that still show obvious homology. I suppose it's up to the viewer to decide why this supposed biologist got this point so horribly wrong.
I cut the video for this RUclips. The longer video and in his lectures he explains his reasons. *Don't forget to like and subscribe to the channel for more content. Thanks friend!!!
He actually did present philosophical evidence, when he touched on irreducible complexity, as in organic mechanisms that can't have prior stages they evolved from. He could have easily pointed out the motors in microorganisms that couldn't have evolved since they literally would have no function without all the necessary parts at once, in fact having said useless parts would reduce the organism's efficiency and increase it's resource dependence for functionality. Such stages of "evolution" require these organisms to carry pseudo cancers with them until they magically develop the motors they never knew they needed. It's quite silly but much of academia believes it without any observation of it lol. Kinda scary how the scientific method takes a back seat when it comes to macro evolution.
@@arcguardian Science has known for decades how biological IC systems form through mechanisms such as exaptation of function and genetic scaffolding. Even creationist Michael Behe who dreamed up the idea has dropped it and no longer uses the argument.
@@arcguardian You wrote, "He actually did present philosophical evidence, when he touched on irreducible complexity, as in organic mechanisms that can't have prior stages they evolved from. He could have easily pointed out the motors in microorganisms that couldn't have evolved since they literally would have no function without all the necessary parts at once, in fact having said useless parts would reduce the organism's efficiency and increase it's resource dependence for functionality. Such stages of "evolution" require these organisms to carry pseudo cancers with them until they magically develop the motors they never knew they needed. It's quite silly but much of academia believes it without any observation of it lol. Kinda scary how the scientific method takes a back seat when it comes to macro evolution."
Which literally proves that you don't know what you're talking about in regard to the actual science, since exactly this creationism pseudoscience claim has been debunked for decades.
Indeed, it was debunked BEFORE the Kitzmiller case in Pennsylvania in 2005 - but the debunking of it was brought up in that case when the defense attorneys presented Michael Behe - and he was crushed under cross-examination by the well-prepared prosecution attorney who presented the scientific facts of his debunking to him while he was in the middle of delusionally pretending that no such debunking had ever occurred. At that point, Behe's testimony was destroyed as just another creationism pseudoscience promoter engaged in delusional science denialism in a self-delusional attempt to perpetuate his bogus personal religious beliefs.
Yes there is a one cell organism, but there are NO 2 cell, 3cell, 4cell 5 cell living organisms on the planet - dissolves darwinism - if you have faith in your darwinism religion that was a theory before the advancement of microbiological science - that was thought up 180 years ago, they didn't even have a working microscope. Sorry, Faith without evidence is foolishness.
I keep telling people, there's just data, and then a lot of inserted narrative, conjecture and hypothesis inbetween the points of data.
yea exactly!*dont forget to like and subscribe for more! Thanks friend
Still waiting for someone who believes he evolved from a nonhuman to show us who in his lineage was not human.
Haha right?*don't forget to like and subscribe for more content. Thanks friend!
Straw man much?
@@numbersix9477 not a straw man. Darwin theorized this to be the case and everyone who subscribes to his hypothetical presumptions believes they are descendants of nonhumans, yet we have zero documentation or observation of it. All we actually can observe is that humans produce more humans just like Genesis 1 says God designed us to.
@@refuse2bdcvd324
What you don't understand is that the theory of evolution doesn't assert that any organism was ever of a different species than that of its like-species parents.
I can recommend a great college level textbook that would bring you up to speed on the subject.
@@refuse2bdcvd324
Darwin's model of evolution was replaced three quarters of a century ago - by the modern synthesis. Your insistence on criticizing a long abandoned model is a textbook example of straw manning.
The OP said, "Animal migration models are easy to address in the post flood world."
Would someone here like to help him out by naming ONE fossil find, within a THOUSAND MILES of Mt. Ararat, of a species of animal known to be indigenous to Australia?
Reasonable evil
Is superior to purposeless random evil.
interesting.*Don't forget to like and subscribe for more content! Thanks friend!
Superior in what way and for whom?
The beauty of science is that it always improves and fine tones our understanding. With new discoveries, the arcane is disguarded. Creationism doesn't progress with understanding. Reason and discoveries discouraged." Do not eat from the tree of knowledge "
The tree of knowledge of good and evil had more to do with morality than intellectualism. God created Adam to learn and grow. God approves of honest science. *dont forget to like and subscribe for more! Thanks friend
From Canada 🇨🇦 Glory to our Father 🙌 and may our Father bless all of you my brothers and sisters in Christ 🙌 I just discovered your channel a couple of days ago and I must say that I am so thankful and grateful for discovering your show 🙏 Thank you
That’s great! Thanks for subscribing. 🙌🏽
As far as the lizards...
I cut an apple open years ago to eat, and the seeds in the apple was already sprouting inside of it.
Never saw it before or after, though I don't even eat apples hardly ever.
I do know that it blew my mind a little bit and I did take a picture.
*Dont forget to like and subscribe for more content! Thank you friend!!!
Did anyone else notice reoccurring shrill feedback at various times during this video?
I know. It’s my poor taste in finding background music
@@anilkanda611You don't NEED music! You're TALKING..
How come the laws of Thermal Dynamics go from self creation of the comos to the deterator of the comos?
Was thinking also shouldn't the 2nd law of increasing randomness make evolution really tricky😂
Biblical advice : "Test everything hold on to the good and avoid every kind of evil! " The mind behind this wisdom is contactable, anywhere, anytime so what have you got to lose? 👀🙄😊❤️.
yup!www.amazingfacts.org/media-library/study-guide/e/4988/t/is-the-devil-in-charge-of-hell-
I know i did not evolve from an ape, that did not happen. That is my factual proof.
*don’t forget to like and subscribe for more! Thanks friend!
That's fine.
So just show us the top down model of creation that explains why 98% of you DNA is shared with apes then???
We've been waiting, and yet not one peer reviewed paper supports your silly childish idea.
@@MrJimiJK
Be patient. anika is working on several scientific papers at this very moment. They will not only pass peer review with flying colors, they will change science forever.
Don’t forget to like and subscribe!
It's a mistake to put music into a discussion program.
Its not that loud.*Dont forget to like and subscribe for more content. Thanks friend.
@@anilkanda611 The discussion is excellent. But many watchers have told you that music in this kind of conversation is quite annoying. Please remove it in advance, please.
@@anilkanda611 For me, as a musician, it's very difficult to focus on the discussion while there's background music. You should understand that people are different.
I really appreciated his humility and balance. That explanation about teleology was such a new way of looking at something I had always taken for granted. Thank you for inviting him to your show, Mr Anil! 😊 May the Lord bless the work of both your hands ❤️
Thank you!!*Don't forget to like and subscribe to the channel for more content. Thanks friend!!!
"I really appreciated his humility and balance."
Less than zero humility. Less than zero balance.
Let me guess, you're another creationism pseudoscience promoters who knows nothing about humility and balance, who promotes religion-based pseudoscience while not actually knowing anything about any of the actual science.
So, yeah, thank you for displaying the two-faced, hypocritical nature of creationist rhetoric.
I couldn't have said it better myself! Thank You Brother!!!!
You bet!!! *don’t forget to like and subscribe for more! Thanks friend
He should publish his research and win a nobel prize. Ha ha ha ha ha
( ・_ゝ・) this is an artistic proof that the universe was created. When you paint a shadow its the opposite color of the object that made the shadow. Nobody knew what the opposite color of white is so the artists avoided painting white on white. The opposite color of white is baby blue and baby pink. The first artist to figure it out was Norman Rockwell. I was the second artist to figure it out. I saw it in the corner of a white room. The lighting was perfect to see it.
In the wise words of Sturmius, "Examination of the eye is a cure for atheism."
Irreducible complexity. Yes!*Dont forget to like and subscribe for more content! Thank you friend
@@anilkanda611 Science has known for decades how biological IC systems form through mechanisms such as exaptation of function and genetic scaffolding.
@@anilkanda611 disproven in US court Dover trial,your ID team admitted it was made up,like religion
@@anilkanda611irriducable complexity, where creationists dont read scientific papers and pretend its not been answered a million times
@@francisa4636 "the second law of thermodynamics says that entropy always increases with time", in other words everything is in a state of continual decay.
The bible states that GOD created everything history is replete with living examples that give first hand eyewitness accounts that GOD spoke the truth.
There are multitudes of secular writings which conclude this very same thing.
Darwin repented right before his death and admitted he was wrong about everything.
Darwin plagiarized a lot of his ideations from his mentor, even using mentors footnotes and ideations
Evolution, especially the way it is taught to children is a lie, created and enforced by academia starting basically in the 1800's
I will take the words of eyewitnesses, historic writings and the perfect examples of nature itself before i would let my mind be poisoned by a bunch of learned God haters
and Atheists and reprobates.
That's really what it comes down to, oh, I forgot, the ignorant and the simple minded who are always the low hanging fruit.
It's such a money making control mechanism that publishers, clearing houses make fortunes off of the lies in textbooks, and will not stop.
Then you have the reprobate, people who refuse to even have a remembrance of GOD, which God says they had till they aborted it.
So really, it's not scientific that much since it is easily debunked and has been over and over, it's a spiritual concern, a product of the fallen and the ignorant and the reprobate
and the non-believer who will at any cost(children be damned) promote their academia as truth when it is lies with some truths mixed together to deceive the masses.
And who would benefit from destroying minds and faiths of people? of course you know
They swallow camels and gag on gnats and and have mastered how to say a lot about every little thing and prove nothing.
It's their darling, it's their power, it's their crack, it's their excuse, it's their religion, it's their faith, and will be their undoing.
Messiah says that "that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth; and that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.
Can't get past that day, it's coming and many of you will be without excuse on that day as you bow and confess.
Why not bow and confess now and obtain the gift of life from GOD now, here, rather then bow and confess on that day in humiliation and being cast down.
Newest analysis of living cells show that they posess qualities of "consciousness."
Atoms posess responsiveness, cjange their electron shell structures in response to receiving and emitting photons of multiple wavelengths.
Our reality posesses a "something" which is akin to awareness from atoms up.
This is miraculous, though many will scoff at the very idea.
*Don't forget to like and subscribe for more content. Thanks friend!
I love this programme but as per the other comment - the background noise is most annoying and a distraction.
Won’t happen again 😆
Excellent interview ! Insults and hand waving don't make this untrue.
Lying about science for Jesus' sake won't make it be true either.
What did he say was a lie?
@@anilkanda611 The claim evolution has to "anticipate the future" is 100% wrong. Either this guy is a willful liar or he's brutally ignorant. You're pushing this guy as some sort of evolution expert so he must be deliberately lying.
@@anilkanda611 Not necessarily a lie but his mealy-mouthed non-explanation for ring species was pathetic.
@@anilkanda611 Everything he said was lie - and most of it was literally the self-projection of a religion-based pseudoscience promoter.
“Natural selection” also sounds like people who believe they are “elect” and they are the only ones given salvation. -a very cultish thing!
The Bible tells us that some "shall turn away their ears from the Truth, and shall be turned unto fables"
( 2 Timothy 4:4); and again that some are "ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth" ( 2 Timothy 3:7; KJV BIBLE)
Yup.*Dont forget to like and subscribe for more content! Thank you friend
For centuries there have been debates,confusions and disagreements about creation and evolution. Want to put an end to this? Get a copy of this book, “The Urantia Book “. Read it in its entirety. You won’t be the same.
There hasn't been a scientific debate over the topic in over 150 years. Creationism lost.
THey are teaching a theory as a fact
I agree. Its crazy.*Dont forget to like and subscribe for more content! Thank you friend!!!
Please. Share with us the science jargon meanings of "theory" and "fact."
The "PhD" should explain why we can't process vitamin C. I won't hold my breath.
Wow burn! Got him now. A little effort please.
Could that be the DNA tweek before the flood that shortened the human life span?
What about the living cell? Where does it originate?
Genesis 1:1*don't forget to like and subscribe for more content. Thanks friend!
👍
This debate was ended decades ago.
The earth isnt 6000 years old and flat, and theres never been any evidence that proves man just appeared magically out of nowhere.
Like the flat earthers, the creationists also have no working model that explains the phenomenon we observe.
Don’t create a straw man. He doesn’t believe the earth is flat, or that the earth is only 6000 years. He never said. Be honest with the dialogue here.
But you believe the universe magically appeared out of nowhere?.
@@anilkanda611
You chastise someone for creating a straw man then immediately create one of your own. That's classic!
very good
AMen*Don't forget to like and subscribe to the channel for more content. Thanks friend!!!
EVIDENCE....the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid. So he wants to manipulate evidence to suit his predefined belief. You can't do it, illogical.
Is historical evidence meaningful to you? I prefer to believe eyewitness accounts not present false scientists believing evolution
what a boatload of crap from this guy
…What a mouthful of crap from you.
The bibke does not promote the marxist idealism of eqaulity either!
Yes Marxism doesnt come from God.*Dont forget to like and subscribe for more content! Thank you friend!!!
How is it that nature does not have a mind to anticipate yet it is happening in nature. Does it imply that something or someone gave the program? Is that what it is?
Has Dr. Standish's Hypothesis been tested by other scientists? Than his option.
Do you believe the universe was created?
Darwinism has been dead for a while and yes, there’s lots of scientists pushing for a new theory.
According to Islamic teachings, the first to be created was the "Pen" ( meaning writing tool, book, instruction manual, etc). And it ( pen) was instructed to write all details what / how/ when that will take place with regards to creation.
The Blue print of the creation.
Creation happened thereafter.
Interesting. John's Gospel teaches the Word. "In the beginning was the Word." Word=Jesus.
*Don't forget to like and subscribe for more content! Thanks friend!!
Evidence like all of the artifacts and drawings of T-Rex, Stegosaurus, Brontosaurus, and others with humans riding or fighting them found all over the world. "Maybe these people had good imaginations." What did the Greek imagination do with the pigmy elephant skeletons much later in time? Oh, that's right, they came up with a race of Cyclops. Glaring problems with the artifacts contrary to the evolution theory.
Exactly. It’s very biased. *Dont forget to like and subscribe for more
@@anilkanda611 Thank you and I liked and subscribed as soon as I found your channel.
Atheists want to know that if God is real, why is there so much evil in the world. I would ask them, if evolution is true, how could there be so much evil in the world? And if there is no devil, why is there so much evil in the world?
@@nschlaakthank you so much!!!
LOL No.. looks like you are reciting apologist talking points. Going to drop a clue to you:
You don't have a degree in evolutionary biology, and the creationists asserting this don't have a degree in it either. They are talking out of their asses and YOU listened. That's a you problem, not a problem with the theory.
People will ignore any evidence that points to God . They don't want accountability, but they'll have it in the end. That, they cannot face so they deny it so they can be their own god and feel good for now.
Atheist cult leader Richard Dawkins said no amount of evidence would convince him that God is real... m.ruclips.net/video/J8BYcBD52Nc/видео.html
Creationists will ignore any evidence that proves that the factually false religious dogma they believe in is wrong.
So, thank you for displaying the deeply hypocritical nature of creationist rhetoric with your own words.
Not to mention the fact that your entire argument as you stated it here is based on the utterly delusional pretension that the majority of Christians disagree with you. Of course, there's also the fact that the VAST majority of Christian reject the fundamentalist Christian doctrine of young earth creationism altogether.
But, hey, I get it, you creationists HAVE to rely on employing such delusional rhetoric all the time, precisely because the promotion of your false religious beliefs relies on it.
Nah, it's just that they don't believe in magical supernatural beings making things like rainbows.
@@iriemon1796 but they do believe that the universe magically created itself.
You wrote, "People will ignore any evidence that points to God . They don't want accountability, but they'll have it in the end. That, they cannot face so they deny it so they can be their own god and feel good for now."
Yes, of course, the two billion+ Christians who disagree with the particular fundamentalist Christian doctrine that you believe in don't exist.
And THUS is how your own words expose the often-delusional nature of creationist rhetoric. Thank you for displaying it.
A quarter of the way through and the music is SO mentally disturbing I am going to forsake listening to the rest...
In the video subtext: "renowned PhD biologist"
Renowned? Seriously? LOL!!!
I pulled up Google Scholar Search, which I've used routinely to look up scientific research on all kinds of topics in science, for many years.
I wanted to see some of the scientific research published by Timothy G. Standish, because I wanted to see what the specific focus of his research was - in other words, what field of science has he done scientific research in.
To my surprise (because, honestly, I didn't know this, and I actually thought that I would see some scientific research articles by Standish on some topics that just weren't of relevance to evolutionary biology; but instead, I found literally nothing), Google Scholar Search produced ZERO...
Read that again.
ZERO... ZERO, zip, nada, nothing. After half an hour I could find ZERO scientific research articles published in any professional science journal of any kind produced by Timothy G. Standish.
So this guy is not only NOT a "renowned PhD biologist" - he's a complete nobody in biological science. I'm not kidding you.
This is, in fact, just another obvious example of the shady, disingenuous nature of the rhetoric that young earth creationists use - as is displayed right here with this video. Another term that comes to mind is "rhetorical puffery." Puffery (definition): "undue or exaggerated praise." Of course, in this particular case, it's praise for something that is completely nonexistent. Which reminds me of snake oil salesmen.
Standish is NOT a renowned Ph.D. biologist. In biological science, he's literally a complete nobody.
This is just another example of how young earth creationists conjure up all kinds of bogus claims about science on a completely vacuous basis in regard to anything in any actual science. Young earth creationist rhetoric is absolutely permeated with these kinds of bogus rhetorical fabrications.
yea im christian and i was just thinking that he prolly isnt
Lying about credentials and achievements is SOP for internet creationists. They know other creationists will never call them on it.
@@OgdenCrimmcramer8162 what is sop?
@@BigSmokes123 Standard Operating Procedure.
@@BigSmokes123 You mentioned that you're a Christian. I'm an atheist myself (former Christian, though) - and, you know, in my discussions with young earth creationists (for over forty years) I've always found it very weird how I'm the one having to point out to them the fact that most Christians reject the particular religious doctrines they believe in (in regard to the religious doctrines related to young earth creationism), while they're the ones all the time employing rhetoric based on pretending that all of the Christians who disagree with them don't even exist.
He definitely needs to brush up on his apologetics. As an ex atheists now christian based on evidence i can assure there are much clearer and better arguements and evidences than one what presented.
You're not arrogant at all. ***Don't forget to like and subscribe for more. Thanks friend
Read this way, natural selection is a vera causa Under this interpretation, Darwin's analogical argument takes centre stage, as Herschel said analogical arguments should, to establish the adequacy of natural selection independently of the evidence that natural selection was indeed responsible for various phenomena.
> But Darwin's analogical argument was *speculative* It included a leap of reasoning that the magnitude of difference between the conditions of artificial selection and those of natural selection would lead to the magnitude of difference between artificially selected domestic races on the one hand and natural species on the other.
The critics who Darwin took most seriously seized upon this weakness.
439 class UH manoa
interesting.
*Don't forget to like and subscribe for more content. Thanks friend!
***just, how much they pay to you.***
Anil in name and content
LOL*Don't forget to like and subscribe to the channel for more content. Thanks friend!!!
Believe what you like!
Believe the truth.
Jesus said I am the way, the truth and the life.
When Adam was accosted about his disobedience, he pointed an accusing finger at Eve. When Eve, the other human in the chain was in turn challenged, she swung on the serpent.
That trend hasn't died out. For those who are prompt to point the accusatory finger at God for all the evil in the world, think again - you are following in the footsteps of your fallen forebears.
Genesis isn't just mythology; it's plagiarized mythology. Borrowing mythological narratives without attribution is deceitful, but claiming those narratives are true history and God's word reveals the clergy's true evil nature.
@@lawrencegreen8952 We were also warned about people like you popping up in the last days. Taraa!!!
Exactly.*Don't forget to like and subscribe to the channel for more content. Thanks friend!!!
And who created the serpent that influenced Eve?
...actually, if he would have simple said "the woman gave me of the tree and I did eat," then it would have illustrated blame on Eve. However, Adam accused God when he stated, "The woman whom *thou* gavest to be with me, she gave me of the tree, and I did eat."
Scientific evidence:
Sudarium of Oviedo, Shroud of Turin, WAXS dating method.
Theleology called biochemistry
Why do you only find Kangeroos in Australia then?
They debunk themselves.
Animal migration models are easy to address in the post flood world
@@anilkanda611
We are men of action. Lies do not become us.
(Originally said by the Dread Pirate Roberts about a completely different lie - but it fits beautifully here nonetheless.)
Why is this video hashtagging "Hitler?" Very messed up.
If you watched the video, the presenter explains how Nazism user Darwinism in its evil agenda. Hashtags bring people interested in a subject to topical videos.
"Keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoid profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called" (1 Timothy 6:20; KJV Bible)
*Dont forget to like and subscribe for more content! Thank you friend
And eugenics
*Don't forget to like and subscribe to the channel for more content. Thanks friend!!!
@@anilkanda611 sure check out mine in return
Genesis 1 is the answer. You either believe the word of God or you twist it to fit fallible man’s word.
Yup I agree.*Dont forget to like and subscribe for more content. Thanks friend.
Darwin was the greatest racist ever.
God created only ONE race ! !
Thats right! *Don't forget to like and subscribe for more content. Thanks friend!
I can't even sit through a full five minutes of this crap without rolling my eyes and moving on with my life.
That's too bad. If you can't listen to opposing viewpoints for a few mins, you are running from something.
Don't forget to like and subscribe!
This socalled biologist is a creationist that works for "geoscience research institute" - a creationist organisation funded by Seventh-day adventist church. He is also connected with loma linda university which is also a Seventh day adventist university.
Expect all claims and arguments to end with: god did it.
This so called biologist has a PHD from nationally accredited university that you might have a degree from and has written several academic papers. Check google scholar.
Pathetic attempt to discredit him without looking at his arguments.
@@anilkanda611I did - it's the same creationist bullcrap I have heard from stephen meyer, Michael behe, Kent hovind etc etc. Yes I also found out where he got his various degrees. Shame he didn't stay there and conducted serious research.
@@Jesper-bl2ns Yes but what do you disagree with? State the challenge.
@@anilkanda611Anything that involves a god. Creationists are not worth a single second of seriousness.
@@Jesper-bl2ns Friend, intelligent design is unavoidable. You may deny who that designer is but there is too much evidence for purpose and intelligence in the world around us.
Here comes the staunch evolutionists who, without fail, will say this guy doesn’t have a single clue as to what he’s talking about. Forget his degree and experience, right? Don’t worry as you lot ALWAYS know better when the highly educated scientists disagree with you. Your guys’ “degree” and “education” means much more. So here it is: the PhD of RUclips comment section evolution contrarianism. I hear that 1000 coursework hours of crapping on anyone’s intelligence when it comes to evolution is all that is required.
Exactly. It started when I uploaded this video. *Don't forget to like and subscribe to the channel for more content. Thanks friend!!!
_Forget his degree and experience_ A Liar For Jesus with a PhD in Biology is still a liar.
@@OgdenCrimmcramer8162 A RUclips commentator who think he knows what is and what is not science is still a RUclips commentator.
@@OgdenCrimmcramer8162 Ah, yes. This supposed liar scientist who was forthcoming in that he doesn’t know everything, though he explained everything pretty well, and was very careful in addressing what was asked was asked that might be in his scope of practice. That guy? Who’s more trustworthy: A humble, yet, educated man who admits he doesn’t know everything there is to know or a man who overconfidently thinks they know everything? I wonder which of the two you resemble most?!
You wrote, "Here comes the staunch evolutionists who, without fail, will say this guy doesn’t have a single clue as to what he’s talking about."
I know what you mean. Far be it from people who know the truth from DARING to point out the fact that this religion-based pseudoscience promoter obviously doesn't know what he's talking about in regard to the actual science.
In the alternate "reality" of creationism pseudoscience, the truth is anathema.
"Same evidence different interpretation" is one of the lamest creation excuses in a whole sea of lame for the simple reason *not all interpretations are equally supported.* Science goes with the interpretation which is best supported by multiple independent lines of evidence, something called *consilience.* Creationists demand each piece of evidence be examined alone with no consideration how their "interpretation" fits with the rest of the evidence as a whole.
A great analogy is comparing studying nature to a giant jigsaw puzzle.
Scientists wants to know the unknown big picture so they collect millions of pieces of evidence. Slowly and methodically they began putting the pieces together where they match. After time they have enough pieces together to clearly see the big picture is the evolution of life over deep time. There are still holes and unknowns to be filled in but the big picture is quite conclusive.
Creationists start with their conclusion and want the picture to show a literal Genesis. The borrow the millions of pieces of evidence from science but instead of putting them together demand each piece be examined independently. They find one piece with a blob of blue and proclaim "this is evidence of Noah's Flood!" They find another piece with a part of a feather and proclaim "this is evidence birds were specially created!" They will never consider all the pieces assembled as a whole because they're deathly afraid of what the big picture will show.
I find evolutionists do the same. *Don't forget to like and subscribe for more content! Thanks friend!
@@anilkanda611 I see another creationist who doesn't understand the concept of *consilience of independent evidence.*
@@OgdenCrimmcramer8162
So is this similar to 'confirmation bias' issues?
@@OgdenCrimmcramer8162 I see another evolutionist who does not understand the concept of ZERO OBSERVABLE AND REPEATABLE EVIDENCE OF ONE SPECIES EVOLVING INTO ANOTHER SPECIES under the accepted scientific method.
Please do not respond and talk about the experiment with flies etc as at the end they were still flies(ie; they did NOT evolve into another species).
Oh! And for your information science does NOT work by consensus but UNANIMOUS and INCONTESTABLE evidence. Only Modern science works by consensus and it is usually paid for.
@@saintsone7877 ...and yet another science illiterate creationist chimes in. There seems to be no shortage of them.
With all the love to you theists, dont you think that god is a preatty cheap explanation for things? Doesnt the god concept just skip every question rather than answering it? How did we evolve? Who gives, god did it so why investigate further? How did the universe began? Who gives, god did it so why investigate further? Aren't you curious about the mechanisms that govern our universe? Or tou really think that an extradimensional omnipotent entity MUST be the cause of everything even when its existence is spoken out in a book that has hundreds of authors, its more than 2000 years old and the documents that should confirm its reliability are written decades after it?
Yes let's be skeptical and use Science to learn about how life began in our universe. But other factors like politics and money affect what is taught, what's in the media and what's put in textbooks.
At one time steady state was Science but now we know that is a false theory...as an example science that has changed.
But if you think about Science like this... Science is not the truth but there is truth in science. In other words science is the collective and EVER-CHANGING truth about our world and universe that we know. But again, it changes as we learn and develop instruments to measure and learn about biology, chemistry, cosmology, etc.
If we know and can sense 4 dimensions of space time and we think there are 11 according to superstring theory, can't we just admit that there is more going on in the universe than we already know? It seems darwinian evolution just keeps being pointed to as the answer to abiogenesis and the formation of human life but it is definately lacking in an explanation of how life began on earth.
People couldn't understand or explain what a rainbow was, SO it must be a god who (?) created them?
atheists can't explain how the universe started, must be something other than God..*Don't forget to like and subscribe for more. Thanks friend
@@anilkanda611 no honest person knows how the universe started! The new JWTelescope has upturned all previous theories!
Listen, we believe GOD created everything 🙏🏻 we did not evolve from an organism . Did Satine evolve from organism 😂i feel sorry for you 😕 😔 😢
Yup.*Don't forget to like and subscribe for more content! Thanks friend!!
Get rid of that background noise. Tuning out in 3 2 1 bye bye. . ...
Bye!👋🏾
@@anilkanda611
I must say that the info presented here is most accurate for leveling the playing field re: creation vs evolution arguments, which I have been following for a few years now. Keep up the good work.
When I was at school 1960's it was ' theory of evolution' now they teach it as fact, load of rubbish !
It's still taught as a theory. The problem here is that you're confusing the layman definition of theory which means simple conjecture or speculation with the scientific definition of theory which means a hypothesis that has been thoroughly and repeatedly tested and failed to be proven wrong. A scientific theory is as close to a fact as is possible outside of mathematics. Other prominent theories you've probably heard of and don't similarly dismiss as "just theories" include the theory of gravity, atomic theory, and the germ theory of disease.
Yup exactly.*Don't forget to like and subscribe to the channel for more content. Thanks friend!!!
@@cazcowwith gravity you can observe and test it's effects, macro evolution from one species to another is not observable
@@Loading....99.99 We make observations and perform experiments with evolution as well. Did you get to the part of the video where he horribly bungles an explanation of ring species? That's one obvious example of evolution in real time based on *observations* and *experiments.*
Also, if you accept gravity as essentially proven despite being a "theory," then you shouldn't be making the same mistake the OP did by confusing the lay and scientific definitions of theory.
@@cazcow it's the same species, it does not change into anything different from what it is.
Incredible comprehensive knowledge to put an end to evolution theory.
Amen!*Don't forget to like and subscribe for more content! Thanks friend!
How did we get millions of species today from a few score on the ark 4000 years ago.
What apologist drivel. Science stands on consensus, this man is so tortured with the conflict between evolution and his own beliefs that he has to "interpret" data differently to the vast majority of his scientific peer group.
How does his interpretation of evolution fit with the bible, Adam and Eve and inherited sin?
The consensus at one time was lobotomies were okay. Scientific consensus hasn’t had a great reputation lately
@@anilkanda611 yes they were used for severe mental illness with variable success rates but have become outdated with scientific advances in psychiatric medication.
That's what science does builds continuously on prior knowledge, early cancer surgery and treatment was absolutely brutal compared to today, at one time surgery was performed without anaesthetic then scientists discovered and evolved the science of anesthesia.
When the scientific community proves the god hypothesis and the main players collect their Nobel I'll change my mind on evolution.
I won't hold my breath.
@@anilkanda611
The consensus of the fundamentalist Christian community was once that mental illness could be cured by casting out demons - maybe it still is. Is it???
Liars make RUclips videos. Truth seekers write peer reviewed papers.
Those are not hasty generalizations at all.
@anilkanda611
Lying about evolution is what young earth creationists do. You don't believe in god, do you. If you did believe the Bible you would have to believe in a young flat earth. The Bible is a flat earth book.
So what is wrong with evolution?
A lot of barriers such as an incomplete fossil record.
*Dont forget to like and subscribe for more content! Thanks friend
@@anilkanda611 You just "liked" a post that said people used to ride T-Rexes mate. Your brain is mush
Just my opinion. If evolution explains our formation, not teleology, then I could have developed into a dog, and my children , might have became a cat and a rabbit.
It's the biggest lie ever told
@@suichinggo8236erm, no. It says you cant do that. You clearly have never even looked into it at a primary-school level
Such interesting content completely ruined by the inane and intrusive wailing cacophony. PLEASE that noise is so distracting and unnecessary. Never waste your effort by adding noise.
It's not that bad. It's barely noticeable.
The music didn't bother me in the least. For me, the content was completely ruined by the inane and intrusive wailing bogus religion-based pseudoscience rhetoric of science denialism.
The consensus across many very well understood fields of science is that evolutionary biology happens. That's why it's taught in schools. You can find maybe five or six PhDs that disagree with it, and that's ok. Even if you found hundreds it would not have impact. Do you get why?
Because human bureaucracy suppresses minority groups
That's because scientists are literally bullied into accepting consensus on matters of interpretation.
You do know that scientific revolutions always happen when people look outside orthodoxy? *Don't forget to like and subscribe to the channel for more content. Thanks friend!!!
The moment u have to appeal to consensus, u are no longer doing science, not that u were doing it in the first place since u'd need the missing ingredient of evolution: observation. Adaptation is observed which is granted by the speakers in this video as well as everyone else, what isn't observed is ur conclusion that animals evolved beyond adaptation.
Bacteria still yields bacteria, dogs yield dogs and so forth, all this is observed. You on the other hand think dogs are linked to fish lol. You can't make this stuff up.
@@arcguardian "You cant make this stuff up" The moment you appeal to mockery you are not doing science. Observation is only one form of evidence in science. I have many books on the evidence of biological evolution. These are written by people who study the topic. These volumes of evidence are the reason why scientists accept biological evolution and common descent. There is a good reason for the consensus, and the comment was not an appeal to consensus.
By contrast, theists have no consensus because they have no idea. Who the messiah is, Jesus, Mohammed? Who knows. How old is the earth? 6000 years? 4.5 billion? Who knows. No consensus. Is the soul eternal? Some yes, some no. Scripture says both, no help at all. Is God a trinity or an A-llah. Which scripture? Faith or works? What a mess!!!
Give me science any day. Dogs and fish have spine with ribs, skull, jaw and four limbs, same DNA, same base pairs. Same central nervous system, same digestive tract, same bilateral symmetry, swim bladder analogous to lungs. Evidently and observably they are linked.
I can't take anyone who uses the word Darwinism seriously. He talks of rates and tribes in conflict, isn't this what the entire Old Testament is about? One can dispute the "theory of evolution by natural selection" but one can not deny that different species come and go and replace each other over vast periods of time. Every hundred million years most species are completely different from the period before, this was known long before Darwin. To be taken seriously a scientist can't ignore this fact. He also totally misrepresents modern evolutionary science and dwells too much on 19th-century science.
Too much emphasis on 19th century science? Okay, how about some 20th century science? Ignoring for the moment the large number of hoaxes accepted, many for decades before the truth came out, let's examine Stephen Jay Gould.
A biologist and paleontologist, Gould by 1972 had determined that the purported transitional forms did not exist in the fossil record, as Darwin had hoped and predicted. He and a colleague developed the concept of "punctuated equilibrium." It proposed that "evolution" was stable (no transitions for long periods of time, then suddenly the equilibrium was "punctuated" by sudden, rapid evolution such that one kind of creature changed to another kind without the time required to leave fossils in a state of transition between kinds. How did the evolutionary science community react? By laughing his idea and its justification off as preposterous., even though they still did and do not have any-- let alone all-- the many necessary transitional forms in the fossil record.
Your statement "isn't that what the old testament is all about" shows your statements cannot be taken seriously.
Really? Maybe you need to re-evaluate some of your statements and stick to facts rather than assumptions you present as facts.
You did now that single cell creatures in the Oceans today are exactly the same as fossilised ancestors found today. They have not become extinct NOR have they evolved.
Many species today are exactly the same as skeletal/fossilised remains found that have been dated many millions of years old.
You really did not do much research and simply stated many half-truths as facts.
And the best was the statement " Every hundred million years most species are completely different from the period before, this was known long before Darwin".
Although not an expert I studied science very well and received good grades and NEVER heard that from any lecturers I studied under.
Please provide the source for that comment if you can.
Modern Evolutionary science is worse than the science of Darwins time.
At least he had the good sense to state if certain evidence did not come to light after his death he might be totally wrong.
To date no such evidence has appeared and Modern Science is no closer to proving his theory than he was when he passed away.
All Modern science attempts to do is change the goalposts each time their latest addition to the evolutionary debate is proven wrong.
Since the 1960's the definition of evolution (by the scientific community that is) has changed at least 5 times that I am aware of.
Your hypothesis is incorrect they have uncovered prehistoric fossils of the same species that still exist today like the sloth the beaver Turtles as well as various numbers of species still walk in the planet.
What we see is the extinction of certain animals through upheaval and Global shifting evolution is not observed science nor are there any evidences of evolution
@@saintsone7877 I don't know why some minority of Christians are anti-science and deny the findings of all the branches of science that conflict with the notion of a young Earth. The rest of the Christian world has no issue. Before Russel Wallace and Charles Darwin published a paper on natural selection some 70 different authors had published papers on the subject but they were wrong about the mechanism by which evolution operated. The most famous was Jean-Baptiste Lamark. Of course, some species are well adapted to an environment that hasn't changed much, for instance, sharks, while others appear briefly in the fossil record before disappearing. Darwin was a Christian and did not publish for more than a decade because he knew that there would be a backlash from the current scientific and religious establishments. He only did so because he found out Wallace was about to publish a paper on the same natural selection. All sciences revise themselves when new evidence appears and there has been a lot of new evidence since Darwin in the field of biology, especially in genetics which weren't even discovered in Darwin's day. But over time theories get refined and more accurate. Religions change too but much more slowly and stubbornly. They eventually let go of obsolete ideas such as the Earth being the center of the universe or the morality of such things as slavery. I will end with the fact that I have no personal investment in the theory of natural selection and my belief or lack of belief in gods does not hinge on it at all. Any theories that seek to replace it have to explain why different species have existed during different time periods most of which are completely different from the previous period. A god could have done this, I won't eliminate the possibility. It just seems highly improbable.
And your specific magic man in the sky poofed everything into existence as is? Youre so desperate for that book of yours to be true
Magic man? No. What is Magic is believing the universe came from nothing. That requires so much faith.
*Dont forget to like and subscribe for more content! Thank you friend!!!
I was really angry when I found out I was lied to by schools who taught me that macro evolution is true, and I find that it isn't. My ancestors were not monkeys. I was REALLY angry to have been lied to by atheistic teaching.
Exactly.*don't forget to like and subscribe for more content. Thanks friend!
The video is very unbalanced. The fossil record is there. Science will pave the way into the future!
No it’s not. The fossil record is incomplete and way too discontinuous. Second, over 14 soft tissue finds have been discovered challenging the long years.
Advances in science is exactly what is disproving Darwin's chimpanzee to ape to aborigines to negro to European racist lies.
200 DNA mistakes every time humans reproduce according to Duke University.
We have been devolving ever since WE were Neanderthal.
Inbreeding with like kinds passing bad traits.
Dog breeding shows this on a more observable scale.
He's right. Evidence can be looked at in different ways. Scientists look at scientific evidence and try to draw rational conclusions from it. Religious believers have predetermined conclusions and try to find ways to make evidence fit it. That is the difference between religion and science.
If you want to find actual truth, you don't start with a predetermined belief about what truth is.
like atheists don't? Let's not pretend atheists dont have confirmation bias. *Don't forget to like and subscribe for more content! Thanks friend!
Are you saying that science never approaches evidence with presupposition…?
@@anilkanda611 I didn't say anything about atheists so I'm not sure why you brought that up. I talked about scientists. Sure, we all have biases. But science is founded upon the principle of the scientific method. The scientific method does not start with a predetermined conclusion about anything. It starts with what scientific data reveals and then draws conclusions from that. Conclusions and interpretation of evidence are subject to scrutiny from peer review. If scientists have a bias that "God" is not the explanation for a phenomenon, it is because there is no scientific evidence of God, not because of a predetermined belief there is no God. As a "real" scientist, you cannot draw a conclusion based on data that is not scientifically verified -- like there is a supernatural being that practices magic.
As an example, take Darwin, since your guest brought him up. In contrast to your guest's assertions, Darwin did not study animals in the Galapagos for the purpose of supporting a predetermined belief in evolution (because the theory of evolution had not yet been developed, by Darwin himself!). Instead, he looked at the scientific evidence -- how different species had different characteristics that were based upon and suited for their particular environments, and inferred that the species has changed to better adapt to their environment.
Trying to equate the methodology of science and religion is a false equivalency, promulgated by apologists who seek to equate science and religion merely being "belief". They are not.
@@NeMoC53 ["re you saying that science never approaches evidence with presupposition…?"] No, a presupposition, or a hypothesis, is made as a basis for testing conclusion. I'm saying science, unlike religion, does not start with the predetermination of an infallible conclusion.
@@iriemon1796 I would argue that anyone that talks of the Big Bang theory or the theory of evolution does exactly what you say science doesn’t do. They make truth statements that are theories. Essentially creating their own religion of time.
Describes the jew thinking exactly 3:00
*Don't forget to like and subscribe to the channel for more content. Thanks friend!!!
It's a funny way of making money.
Telling people that Biology is wrong.
Yet it works !
Spontaneous generation (the emergence of life from nonliving matter) has never been observed. Life only comes from life = the law of biogenesis.
The theory of evolution claims that life came from nonliving matter through natural processes.
This PhD Biologist needs to go back to school.
refute him if you can. *Don't forget to like and subscribe to the channel for more content. Thanks friend!!!
Do you have a PhD?
@@Loading....99.99 Just because he has a PhD does not mean he is correct, I can give you a long list of PhD's who disagree with him. Most all agree with Darwin.
@@williamtotherow3367 i agree a PhD can be wrong, but in this case you don't need a PhD to see that macro evolution is pure stupidity. Do you believe you evolved from a monkey?
@@Loading....99.99 _you don't need a PhD to see that macro evolution is pure stupidity_ Please provide your scientific evidence macroevolution is "pure stupidity". Your ignorance based personal incredulity is worth less than nothing.
Applying religious apologetics to science??hahahaha😂
If you watched the video, you would have known that atheism is just as much as religion as christianity is. Please dont pretend about that.
@@anilkanda611 Yeah buddy,Just like non-stamp collecting is a religion,but true,unlike a God…☃️
@@SabracadabrOGo troll somewhere else.
@@eddyvos2628 The people who deny science,but worldwide flood, talking donkeys snakes etc,tapping out”troll”on a device that’s from the science YOU deny,delicious 😘
@@SabracadabrO " the people" ... Who ?
This is silly. Two preachers having a personal consensus. The poor biologist is not being a scientist here. He interprets his world on a presupposition of God existing and being good. Science deals with studying the natural world, not trying to make it fit into his Bible.
He literally has graduate degrees in biology. When you disagree with someone, don’t belittle a presenter because you don’t like it. That’s the tool of fools.
@@anilkanda611 All he has to do is write up his falsification of modern evolutionary theory and have it published. He'll immediately become the most famous scientist of all time. Something tells me he won't do it though and will continue to spread his lies in non-science venues like this one.
Well, there's also the fact that the VAST majority of the Christians who also do professional scientific research in biology, genetics, and paleontology accept biological evolution and totally disagree with this religion-based creationism pseudoscience promoter. Meanwhile, they're publishing actual scientific research in actual science journals of biology, genetics, and paleontology that backs up biological evolution - while this creationism pseudoscience hasn't published squat in scientific research that falsifies any of that.
He's merely another religion-based creationism pseudoscience promoter talking out of his butt with his science denialism on some religious broadcast that doesn't have anything to do with any actual science at all. Typical creationism rhetorical charade.
You have to stop writing headlines like "They lied to us in school". It really hurts your credibility. It sounds like you're claiming teachers conspired to teach things they knew to be false, and that is nonsense. The credibility issues are why so few young people have any use for religion. You're not helping.
Public schools are set up to make good little atheists. They reject any evidence for god and there is a lot of evidence.
Intelligent design is not even aloud to be presented as a theory even though I would argue there is more evidence for intelligent design than there is for random processes for origins of life and origins of the universe
Let me guess you didn't actually watch the whole video. If you did, you would know why I gave it that title.
@@anilkanda611@anilkanda611 You are, in fact, the one who is lying about Ernst Haeckel and his embryology drawings. Evangelicals have claimed that a university panel accused him of fraud but this was never documented. Certainly there was never a "conviction". There were clerics and devout professors in the 1870's who tried to smear his name but it was an ideological smear, not a factual one (Richards, Robert J., 2008, 2009). I'm sorry to see you are still perpetuating the smear. I hold the injustice against you.
You are silly, does the government knowingly lie to the people? Do banks knowingly lie? Does big tech knowingly lie?
The science denialism of creationism pseudoscience promoters is one of the primary factors motivating young people to leave the religious denominations they were raised in. I'm not making this up. This was shown in results by the Pew Research Center and the Barna Group.
They're both right and both wrong, evolution was interrupted by a higher form of life.
*Don't forget to like and subscribe for more content! Thanks friend!!
Still waiting for someone who believes he evolved from a nonhuman to show us who in his lineage was not human.
Funny, we were created in GODS image thank you MY LORD, FOR that i know where I know where i came from and i know where I'm going, AMEN 🙏🏻❤
Take a DNA test?
What's funny though is thicko theists don't actually understand evolution and say daft things like you just have.
How about you show us in the fossil record when man magically appeared fully formed?
Because we've still not found it.
@@MrJimiJK the existence of Adam and Eve is a verified scientific fact. In the journal Science from Aug 1, 2013 researchers from Stanford University explain how the Y chromosome can be traced back to a single human male and the mitochondria can be used to reveal the maternal lineage back to a single female. Observable science verifies scripture. Please accept observable science and documented history; declare Jesus as your Lord, believe in your heart that God raised him from death and you will be saved (Romans 10:9).