It’s very unfortunate that those who disagree with what Major Coleman said seem to belittle or degrade him rather than submit counterpoints. It does not make someone less intelligent for submitting a different viewpoint from you, if your viewpoint is as superior as you claim, it should be nearly effortless to convince them to your “truth”. It doesn’t cost anything from us to be kind to one another and we need it most when we disagree.
He thinks cats and dogs should be able to breed if evolution was true (it would falsify evolution). He thinks abiogenesis is part of the theory of evolution. He basically understands nothing, and is just arguing against a strawman. Incompetence or malice is of course hard to judge. Probably he is more willfully ignorant. I am not saying he has to accept evolution for me to respect his opinion on it. But he has to understand it. He does not. And we are not talking "he got a few details wrong". No, we are in the 2+2=5 level of ignorance here.
@@lmoelleb abiogenesis has historically been part of the theory of evolution. Evolutionary theory is an attempt to explain the origin of species through natural means without supernatural Creation. Logically, unless you concede the existence of God and subscribe to theistic evolution in order to explain the origin of life (a position that has been shown to be unsustainable), abiogenesis must have originally occurred in order to commence the process of Darwinian evolution. Abiogenesis is required by evolution as the starting point. The growing trend among evolutionists today to attempt to sidestep the problem of abiogenesis by contending that evolution has nothing to do with the origin of life, but rather is a theory which starts with life already in existence and explains the origin of all species from that original life form is either intellectually dishonest, agenda driven or just brainwashed indoctrination.
I grew up Catholic and was taught to only have “blind faith” and not question any of the Church’s doctrines. When I went to university I was quickly indoctrinated into Secular Humanism. I took so many philosophy of religion courses that I had an unofficial minor in it! (Of course, not one single class was taught by anyone of faith - all were taught by Atheists.) It wasn’t until almost 2 decades later when I was 37 years old that I was actually exposed to Apologetics. That is, the evidence for belief in God. But even more succinctly, the truth that Yahweh, the one true God and Creator of the universe loved His creation (humanity) so much that he humiliated Himself by becoming one of us. This was foretold in multiple scriptural prophecies. He lived with us, He loved us, He taught us the true meaning of the Torah, Tanakh, and other scriptures and most importantly… He died in the most humiliating and tortured way while taking the sins of the world upon Him. After this, He was resurrected and defeated death itself for any and every person who chooses to accept this gift of salvation. I truly believe that anyone who honestly seeks truth will find it in the One who is Truth.
Hi Lisa, your story can be true. But to say being a Catholic is to follow the truth of the faith blindly can't be true. May be you were young at that time when you were told just to have faith in God. However, Catholicism is the most developed and highly sophisticated form of Christianity because it's of Christ. It can't be anything else. Right before Luther came, Catholicism was 1500 years old. And that means the Church has examined and thought about the truth for 1500 years. Indeed, betrayal and corruption, just like Judas, was and still is part of Church. As unacceptable as it is, it doesn't change the fact that Catholicism, with it's younger sister Church in Orthodox, is the only faith that is of Christ and Christ of God.
“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, and against the worldly gouernours, the princes of the darkenesse of this worlde, against spirituall wickednesses, which are in ye hie places.” Ephesians 6:12 Geneva Bible version He was absolutely correct about having a duty stand against evils.
"A war of ideas" So true. I grew up in the church and was bombarded on all sides by what we might cal today memes casting doubt on Christianity. I always believed in God, but like many people I was filled with doubts and unanswered questions. It's only with the help of RUclips that I have finally solidified my faith in Jesus, and the Bible. Yes, I watch debates, I listen to competing theories. There are a lot of good sounding theories, but they all fall apart when taken as a whole. Yet, the Bible continues to outshine all other theories when properly examined.
If you are believing book that has been manufactured by man then you are indeed a gullible person. Much has been written about the bible and its true authors .... you only have to google and read. Spoiler alert: No one is coming to save you, me or the family next door ..... wars will come and go like famine in the 21st century. Man is basically a barbarian wearing a suit.
@@ob1coyote most of us get I doctrinated into religion from a young age and start from the presupposition of the faith to accept or reject information presented to us. I was like this for 30 years. Then I made an effort to read and study and work from the evidence out to a reasonable explanation instead and this revealed the weakness of the bible.
Please dear sir, write a book. Please publish a book that will be accessible to all and will be available long after you’re gone. You have a wealth of wisdom and knowledge. Please immortalize it by publishing.
Yes, write a book so you can publish your unchallenged falsehoods. Don't write a scientific paper where your beliefs can be blown apart by evidence. Please keep preying on the scientific ignorance of your audience to keep reaping in that money. Not bad for a high school dropout!
I recommend any book by Dr Jonathan Sarfati, Refuting Evolution, The Greatest Hoax on Earth A Refutation of Dawkins' Greatest Show on Earth, By Design, and his commentary, The Genesis Account.
After all these years traveling the universe of the media searching for truth here it is taught I was alone but yet here I found living faith wow!!! I was blown away not because I am black but because someone believe in science and faith wow!!! just wow!!
I'm so honored to see my professor on screen. Truly humbled. ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ I wish I pursued your wisdom knowledge and understanding before graduating. God bless you, Professor Coleman.
@user-xp4fm2st8u then why don't you go up and debate with your evidence? Instead of trolling comments, show what you got. At least he chose to risk his name and rep... don't hide behind a screen and a random user name. Go up and debate it if you're so well versed.
@@snollennubecause literally every point Coleman or any creationist has brought up has been debunked a billion times over. Why don't you get out of an echo chamber and try to demonstrate your beliefs & claims.
@cwillis92 Oh wow, it looks like someone is big-mad. Can't argue with you. 🤣🤣🤣 Well, you know that Professor Coleman has reward money for anyone who was willing to debate him on his research and prove him wrong. You should go show your "billions of times" research, surely you could win the money. You surely got more credentials than the university professors who disagree but never showed. Go on now, let's see whose behind the screen debunking scholars... For the record when a person inflates the reality of their claims like "billions," "every," and "echo chamber," its usually due to them not being confident in their own statement and needing to exaggerate it to make it appear greater than it is to make it sound credible or strong. Hopefully that helps... 🤷🏿♂️🤷🏿♂️🤷🏿♂️
@@hongotedesco8931 take your own advice and read the bible before you knock it as BS. also if you blindly follow what scientists that are payed to spin a narrative say your shooting yourself in the foot.
I wish professor was my lecturer in Jurisprudence, maybe I'd have continued pursuing my law degree. Lol, I was in Africa though. My lecturer told us to forsake God if we were believers. Sadly, many did stop believing. I chose my faith; it was a constant battle between my faith and the philosophers whose arguments I had to read and vouch for lol.
Kudos to your lecturer for trying to save you from wasting your brain. That is something we rarely see in Africa. His efforts were in vain but he tried.
I'm a game dev. I can make a simple universe in a weekend. I can program the "natural processes" like erosion for example. I don't even need to be present once I execute. With enough time, knowledge and power I could sim our universe to the atom. I would be the watch maker. My simulated humans could have free will to choose. I can give them attributes before they are conceived that I would be completely aware of. I could make my universe scale to full in 6 in game days with the appearance of thousands. None of this would be random unguided processes. Even if it appeared so to my sims. The best part? Trying to make them understand my world and their place would be quite challenging. I would be beyond their understanding. I'm a highschool dropout. If I can do this.... Imagine what's out there beyond what people claim to know. How many true things are beyond the reach of your senses? Magnetism, electricity, DNA, radiation are all discoveries, excavated from reality. None are scientific inventions. We don't even know what gravity is or how it works. The fool says there is no God, sitting in their little corner of infinity. Random natural unguided processes? Pure fantasy. It's a joke. The evidence is blinding if you have the courage to actually consider it. ( edit: My responses won't show. My fundamental claim is that it is feasible the universe is created. Multiple overlapping contingent systems are likely not accidental. How many perfect dice rolls (back to back) are you willing to believe are "strange coincidences". What sum = proof? )
Well said. All discoveries are just waiting to happen. But men would rather praise themselves than praising He who made it be. They rather give credit to randomness in order to exalt their ego. The fool said in their heart there's no God. Their "wisdom" is turned into foolishness.
Lol in my 40 years of being a Christian, and I consider myself a devoted scientist, I love your post :-). Last but not least, I have not looked but is there a Sim Universe out there? I also was a software developer but not your caliber, but I have thought it would be cool to have an object oriented DNA creation simulator, have not looked for one of those either.
Whatever can be imagine can be created. The laws of physics keeps changing because what is imagined, and manifests from imagination, the laws of physics have to alter, and expand to account for the impossible stuff of imagination.
I love when people who clearly have no idea what they’re even arguing against think that they’re going to disapprove the most sound scientific theory in the field of biology. As if they who don’t even understand the theory, see something that people who have studied it for the vast majority of their lives, didn’t see. it would be downright hilarious if only it didn’t mislead even more people into thinking they know what the theory of evolution even proposes, let alone that it’s been debunked. And I see plenty of people on here who think they’re going to argue that this law professor has all the facts straight about what the theory of evolution is, and says should happen according to said theory. Let me make it clear now: he could not be more objectively incorrect. He does not understand what the theory of evolution is or says. If you were to spout this in a base level college biology class, he would probably be corrected by freshman in the first two minutes of speaking, and it would only get worse from there.
Yet evolutionists have largely avoided debates with creationist , and when they have agreed the weight of scientific evidence to support creationism has invariably overwhelmed them . Why ? Because the evolutionists theories don't stand up to empirical scrutiny !!!
I am genuinely interested in learning how Professor Coleman explains why the age determination by the Radiocarbon 14 Method (which seems to measure time periods far greater than 6000 years) yields incorrect results. - As I said: honestly interested.
It's the rate that carbon "expires". There was a science book I took in Classical Conversations that had a zebra on the front that explained the nitty gritty of this very thing! It specifies the math etc. I don't remember the details but I remember it being very exacting!
Anil (and team), this is the first time in my life seeing this show - had no idea it existed. Compliments on your presenting (and the team's hard work), you're doing a fine job - Praise God. Love from 🇿🇦
So the "expert" asked people to come forward with science and "prove we are wrong". This shows a NON scientist, with zero idea of the scientific method wants to prove a negative - an impossibility inthe scientific method! Then we see the "expert" has ZERO qualifications in science - yes, an appeal to authority by me initially, but when we have already shown he doesn't understand science it gains credibility!
@@anilkanda611 it's pretty simple. Science requires falsifiable evidence, repeatable and testable evidence, and be supported by the data. Opinion means NOTHING in science, just like guesses. It also means that if you don't know, you don't make stuff up. Sir, like most of your comments on here, you make opinion based comments with no substance. I'm happy to provide citations but as you would well know, RUclips does not allow me to vote them. And for a lawyer to make "scientific" claims that he doesn't support with evidence simply enforced my point. He is a well known apologist with a reputation for claiming science when there is none. Address my comment on the "energy of a trillion billion atomic bombs" to show you have even a little understanding of the ridiculous claims he makes.
What even is a trillion billion🤔 and at 42Pj per nuke if he meant a billion trillion (or sextillion) then that is likely to be very damaging to the planet, like so damaging a wooden boat with 3 foot thick reinforced walls would be destroyed like match sticks, this is a REALLY BIG force that has been claimed so big a sizable quantity of material would be ejected into space!
The Epic of Gilgamesh and Genesis may just stem from the same historical event, that's why they are similar. Both stories have an ark, but the one described in Genesis is seaworthy, the one in the Epic of Gilgamesh is not. Also, just because the Epic of Gilgamesh may be older doesn't mean it's the source for Genesis.
@@Meow-xx6oo Gilgamesh must be a giant giving his side of the story. Remember they were destroyed yet some survived, as Genesis 6 says there were giants before the flood and after that. Therefore some must have survived in something unsubmersible of sort, the story of Enki tells exactly that. The so called mythologies are various tales from the perspective of these "men of renown", caried over and embellished by the "loosers" In any case these giants/nephilim give credit to the genesis account, even from their twisted mind, we gather that the flood was reaL, it's the TRUTH and that's what matters. Let's choose who we follow.
When we see a metropolis, we think of the architects. When we look at the intricate inner workings of a swiss watch, we think of the watch-maker. When we look at the immensely complicated machinery of the human cell, which works like a metropolis & swiss watch on the molecular level, we think of the Architect & Watch-Maker, not random processes.
And the only reason you think of the architect and the watchmaker is because of the overwhelming amount of physical evidence that you can see, touch,and witness for yourself that leaves you with no other choice Then to be convinced humans are Responsible for not only the creation of the watch and the building but These creations of human beings have evolved from the very simple, As is the case with the human created sun dial, to the very complex human created Rolex wristwatch. The very simple mud and grass hut shelters, To the very complex skyscraper. For the bible tells me so is not evidence that a character from a book Created Anything.
@@RobertSmith-gx3mi what you've presented is overly simplistic sophistry. Do we necessarily need to 'see, touch' or feel something to know it's real? No, we don't. Does something need to be tangible to be real? No, it doesn't. 90% of the universe is made up of something called dark matter which we can't 'see', feel, 'touch' or even measure directly (it has to be measured indirectly from the speed of light & is so subtle that it hardly exerts gravity). Yet it is real and in abundance in the universe. Simple mud huts? Sure. Fact is, simple or complex, someone still made them. They are created. So, I'm really unsure what your argument is.
@@skunkape5918 The evolution of the building from hut to skyscraper was a play on words meant to highlight the evolving complexity, style, and artistic design of the humam amimal.
Also, it took 100 years to build (one guy! Maybe his sons helped), When people asked “what are you doing?” He said “building an arc because when it’s done, God is gonna make it rain and flood the planet!” Rain? What is rain? (It had never rained previously.) They laughed at him! 100 years of mockery! When he pulled the door closed the rain began. It covered every mountain. No more mockery! Today, we’re at it again. Mind you, anyone who believed could get in the boat. Nobody believed! Global unbelief is not a strange thing. Christ is the new Moses type! Anyone who wants in the boat is welcome. Anyone who wants to stand with the mockers is welcome to do so also. Free choice!
Amazing details you can all spout for something that never actually happened. Too bad that the ENTIRE WORLD, with the exception of Israel, never experienced or historically recorded this " worldwide" flood !!!
Nowhere does it say anywhere that anyone else was welcome. The story literally say as build an ark for you and your family. As far as we know, no one else was welcome.
@hdmaragh This is true. God decided to murder (the BIG hypocrite) every man, woman, child, and baby on Earth, including nearly all of the animals and plants, except for Noah's family!
He's a Law professor with an undergrad's understanding of biology and I have a degree in engineering. I would not try to explain law to this man and I don't expect him to explain biology to me or anyone else unless he is qualified in that field. He is explaining a belief he has, if I was explaining a belief I had in something that was concerned with the law and getting it wrong I would expect to be called out for it by people with knowledge and not by people with beliefs.
I believe you and i also believe that's were everything should end at impressive. Nothing more nothing less. What they built is impressive but proves nothing
@@ntsokolomemani3874Then clearly you haven’t been. That ark is literally full of evidence. Sticking your head stubbornly in the sand does not count as counter evidence.
But is it as impressive as the Duripinar site in Turkey on the mountains of Ararat. Mountains being plural in scripture concerning Noah's Ark. Not only are the dimensions spot on, but ground penatrating radar showed right angles and the look of compartment remnants. It's certainly no mere rock formation. I hope to go soon. The Turkish government conducted these tests, and they even made a visitor center. The length is exact in royal Egyptian cubits, as Moses would have known, while the width is a little wider since ancient boats will splay. If the writer of the ancient story made it up by the boat shaped object's dimensions, it would have been these wide measurements. Instead it conforms with reality. Not to mention all the holed anchor stones dropped in the area, up in the mountains.
@@lionzion1879you are saying that because you didn't hear the falsehood you want to hear...if you have a better argument come out and debunk his claims the prize money is still available for grab 😅😅😅 Nothing can create nothing but Nothing 😮.
@@anilkanda611 I suppose it could be called chance, but the solar system formed from a cloud of interstellar gas and dust. (Mostly hydrogen). An accretion disk developed around the central mass which was condensing into the sun. Gravity caused clumps to form in the accretion disk. As they got larger their gravity increased and most of the rest of the debris was pulled into them. These became the planets. We have seen this process taking pace in other star systems. When the central mass gets hot enough it is called a protostar. Further gravitational collapse eventually triggers nuclear fusion at the core. That's when it becomes a star. One principle of critical thinking is accepting verifiable facts. Everything I just described is entirely consistent with what we observe in our own solar system and a handful of others that can be observed from a great distance. Go to Wikipedia and read about stellar evolution.
I like what this man is doing. He’s not a pastor collecting tithes and offering. He has distinguished himself from other by embarking on a unique journey that will make people remember him after he’s long gone.
I am not a pastor, and i collect nothing, but I will try to share honoring tithes and offerings. I give tithes and offerings because these are needed for the church( not the building but the body) to function and work on reaching everyone with the gospel. If you are a true ambassador of the Kingdom of God, you will be looking at where to give tithes and offerings, because your business is to promote God's kingdom. Now when you don't tithe, this is not sin, but those who tithe without are making a covenant with God since God is a God of covenant. So even though not tithing is not a sin, those who tithe get the benefit those who don't will not get. it is like going to the gym improves your health while those who don't go don't have the benefit of those who go. Of course, any pastor or man of God forcing you to tithe is wrong. but please let us understand well what tithing and offerings are before speaking against them in general. Tithing and offering are spiritual exercises of faith. and God sees all those who do it and the reason in their hearts and reward everyone according to their motives
You don’t think pastors should be paid for teaching, preaching, leading people to Christ, counseling and being available for service 24/7? Dr. Coleman seems to think so.
So you lot mean to tell me before God so loved the world to the extent that he would give his only son to be violently assaulted and murdered to shed his blood, he actually committed a genocide on a global scale with a big big flood???? Now as a good Christian who is extolled (in Matthew 5:48 ) to be perfect like God, would you kill all your children who have become wayward in order to give yourself a new start?? Please dont answer to me. It's just food for thought for yourself. As a human with far less intellect and compassion than God, wouldn't the destruction of your children be the last thing on your mind as a solution, especially if you have the power to change/reform them just by the power of your own pronouncements? Now check this. The bible says, God REGRETTED for creating humans and decided to commit such an act as a solution to pervasive sin. And then after this act also he regretted again??? and the promised to never do so again using a rainbow as a sign of covenant? God killed everyone in a flood with the objective of dealing with pervasive sinfulness. Did it work? He burnt Sodom and Gomorrah too it never worked, He ordered the Amelikites to be assaulted women and children killed, that too never worked, He again resorted to the violent murder of his own child, and still! today there is pervasive sin. for ascribing such spectacular failure to God how long before you realized that all this could only be borrowed myth? How long? How fucking long?
So noone from the evolutionary studies group showed up on a Saturday morning, therefore the bible is true and evolution is false. Wow, wow. The explanatory depth is awesome.
Interesting, Dr. Coleman being a law professional is "debunking" Evolution! We'll wait next year, he'll sure get his Nobel Prize and teachings on talking snakes and how to stone women will be taught in schools thanks God!! What whole lotta baloney!!! 💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩
Funny. Like Stalin, Like Mao, Like Pol Pot, ..oh wait, those tyrants were all atheists.*Dont forget to like and subscribe for more content. Thanks friend.
Talking snakes, and also life coming from nothing. You forgot about that crazy worldview, oh my bad, that’s what you believe. So a talking snake is crazy but life coming from non life is not crazy?
If you have committed the philosophical suicide of religious belief you really aren't in a position to ' debunk ' anything. If one has a basic understanding of science and faith based religions, one would understand the folly of arguments around faith based ideas vs scientific discovery. Faith involves blind obedience and rigid adherence to the doctrine. Science involves the search for answers that can be updated once a better understanding is achieved. You don't debunk Science, just update the answers as more information becomes available. This is why religions are static and scientific advancement is fluid. I wish more religious people would understand what Faith actually means.
Ive been a Young Earth Creationist since '98 not long after I got Born Again. In those 26 years atheists have not come up with any new evidence or arguments for evolution. If anything, we have discovered even more complexities in the cell like interactomes which make Darwinian Chemical evolution even more impossible. I love this model of Noah's Ark, there's also a man in Denmark, Johan Huibers in Dordrecht, Netherlands. who actually built a full scale model of the Ark which took him 20years.
Why were you expecting atheists to give you proof for evolution? Were the early contributors to evolution atheists? Are microbiologists atheists? Evolution is a scientific fact it has absolutely nothing to do with atheism. Evolution theory is supported by atheists and theists. Ironically everyone that opposes Evolution is a theist. That is a good pointer to the group with an agenda
@@kosgoth Why is it that you feel the need to minimize others in order to make a point? Also, how is a lawyer debating an opposite position ironic? In my opinion, he seems to be the perfect person for the job. He has all the proper training to prove his point. All it would take is researching both sides and comparing the evidence. There is a lot of creationist scientist in the world that rejects evolution, so the data is there for a good debate. So a judge concluding that the “intelligent design claim had no scientific merit” and could not “uncouple itself from religion” is somehow enough proof for you? You don’t think it took an intelligent designer to create all the order and precision in our universe? from the molecular level to the order of the galaxies? But somehow taking God out of it and saying we’re all here by accident/chance is somehow science. Evolution has a lot of holes in its theory. For example, there’s no fossil evidence for the intermediary stages of any species on Earth. How does the universe arises from nothing and then explodes in a bang? Where did the energy come from for the explosion to take place? Where does consciousness come from? How are we able to discover math in an accidentally created universe? umm sound like a religion to me lol But the bible doesn’t get enough credit. Once upon a time, people claimed a flat earth rested on top of elephants. The Bible always claims it to be a circle/sphere (Isaiah 40:22) and suspended on nothing (Job 26:7) before anyone. If you think about it, evolution is only popular today because of indoctrination. Most of us are taught to believe it from a very young age and it would be taboo to refute it.
Because he is a lesser. So are the people that accept this nonsense, just like flat Earthers. These claims are known by the relevant scientists and they know they are meritless. eg. Entropy refers to usable energy in a system. not complexity, we get energy from the sun via plants. Evolution doesn't violate that. A living body or set of bodies, or species etc, isn't an enclosed system. The Prof is wrong. I could go on every point but that would be a major response. Any of these topics are available on the internet. pewresearch Darwin Day 6 from 2019 Scientists overwhelmingly agree that humans evolved over time, and most Americans are aware that this is the case. Among scientists connected to the American Association for the Advancement of Science, 98% say they believe humans evolved over time. In court it has repeated failed for In Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District (2005) District Judge John E. Jones III ruled that intelligent design is not science but “a religious argument” and “nothing less than the progeny of creationism.” There is no science to creationism. It is false.
@@anilkanda611 Oh yea, are you equally concerned about the "flood" that's wiping out the Palestinians right now!? I'm gonna guess not because you're part of the cult that believes "a god" gave white europeans land thousands of miles from their biological homeland! Save your sanctimony!!
Why would a Professor of Law know anything about the Theory of Biological Evolution? And surely he doesn't. 11:50 Where on earth did he get 90 forms, kinds, of life - and what are they? He mention the wrod 'genus' but it by no means clear what he means. And where did he get the number '15,000 animals on the Ark' from? 13:10 He think there were TWO pairs of each 'kind'. Where did that come from? Everyone else think there was ONE pair. 14:20 Four postulates fo evolution 1: Life come from non-life 2: All multicellular life-form comes from single celles life forms. Then he states something that is simply not true, that we have no two celled life forms. Besides that, there is no need for wuch a creatiure in evolution, but it does actuallye exist. 3: Time and Chance drive evolution. A very naïve description - or rather downright wrong, as it rules out Natural Selection. His calculation of a single protein 'coming together' is probably correct, but is just irrelevant. We know that functional beneficial n´brand Ne protein coding genes can emrege in the genome of various organisms. 4: Small differences accumulate to major differences. Then he refers to Mendel who didn't show anything like what he suggests. And it is actually not true - new genes DO appear. When he cannot describe Biological Evolution correctly, and cannot point to relevant problems, there is really not so much more to say. The rest is just irrelevant!
Okay, then answer those four postulates/questions…with scientific evidence. Bet you can’t. Look…evolution COULD still be an answer, but nobody to this date can actually answer the biggest flaws of it.
I reject the ton of evidence for evolution and believe life began by magic. I can't be wrong because I believe myself to be a God. Makes sense to me lol. Faith is the most dangerous concept ever invented by humans. Education Critical thinking Empathy
I think the professor is being a little dishonest. Any evolutionist biologist would have been bitting at the bit to discuss and or debate any creationist on how we came to be. There are tons of evidence bolstering the scientific theory of evolution. Shame on you
That’s a shame you came to that conclusion. The students who were interviewed were actually there witnessed it. Naturalism is not a solid theory as you were taught to believe.
@@anilkanda611 So the alternative is God did it? Which God? Supernatural explanations have never been proven just debunked each and every time. That is not my opinion that is fact
@@billjohnson9472 Scientific Theory is the proven hypothesis. That is the mechanism that we use to determine what is true in our world. No religion, no Gospel or holy book that was written by man can only make claims that don’t have evidence to support such claims
This is exactly the stuff that Kent Hovind does and I'm so grateful you've presented this bit as well. Easy to understand and broken down to something reasonable. P.S. I would love to see if you could come to Campbell University here in North Carolina. They used to be a Christian school, but have recently broken off from the Baptist convention and have started becoming a little too "liberal" if you know what I mean.
@@josefniederer5039 I’m paid to make responses to RUclips videos? The fuck are you on about, mate? 🤣 And it’s precisely because I DON’T get paid to comment or teach and have to do other work that I will not be teaching Biology 101 here. If you want a quick one to check “Dr.” Hovind on, try seeing if you can find him defining what a “kind” is and then see how long it takes you to find an animal or plant that doesn’t fit that definition. Or perhaps Dr. Coleman’s take on cats and dogs breeding. If cats and dogs could breed that would actually disprove the theory of evolution as it actually exists. According to the theory of evolution, cats and dogs most definitely should not be able to breed. If you’d like to know more, there are many many sources on both RUclips and educational journals. I am not a science, teacher, or a paid “evolution, promoter“ or whatever the hell you think I am. I am just a man who loves science education and hates scientific misinformation.
name specifically one time he's been debunked. If you're confident in your statement then provide your proof he's been debunked.@@ferociousrazordino3581
It’s not. He says evolution is absolutely false but then also says that dogs on the ark became foxes (which requires evolution to occur). The flood story itself is incredibly unscientific, along with many others in the Bible
“I am quite conscious that my speculations run beyond the bounds of true science. It is a mere rag of an hypothesis with as many flaws and holes as sound parts.” -C. Darwin
@@refuse2bdcvd324 NIce straw man buddy. You get a gold star on your report card for creating such an utterly disingenious and dishonest argument That is not how evolution works. WE HAVE directly observed the evolution of new species, and WE HAVE found over 6000 transitional fossils spanning more then 20 transitional species just for human evolution alone. But instead of arguing against the actual evidence and what we are actually saying you first completely misrepresent what we are saying and then argue against that instead
@@refuse2bdcvd324 So on some level you must realize that we are right and that you cannot argue against the facts and arguments we present, or why else would all of you do what you just did ?? Or they outright lie about what science says and then argue against that. while in 20 years I have never seen a creationist make an genuine argument against what we are really saying . NOT EVEN ONCE Btw doesn´t lying go against the core values of your religion ?? So not only are you being a hypocrite about evolution, youi are being a hypocrite about yxopur own religion as well.
Single to multicellularity has been demonstrated in the lab. The Methusaleh tree is 4,855 years old which predates the traditional date for the flood, but so does Pando which is 80,000 years old.
4855 years old! That is still a estimate a tree grows according to what the experienced year after year of water fall temperature and nutrients. And data doesn't go back that far especially in its region. What temperature data goes a little over 100 yrs. Until you can cut it down and count rings maybe you could get a closer estimate. Next point when was Adam and Eve created? Some estimates are approximately 9700 yrs ago or 55,000-120,00 or most popular estimate 6000 yrs. So let us say 6,000....... 6000 - 1656 = 4344 yrs! To me that estimate is close enough that it to prove it was after the flood. If a tree grows where there is good soil and rain it will out grow a tree in poor soil and poor rain fall or just in not so friendly conditions. I've seen trees in Reelfoot Lake that over 200 yrs old that are the size of the same tree as one that are approximately 10 yrs. I know of two trees my father planted the same time and one is over 50 ft and the other is 20 ft. They are about 75 yards apart. One is next to a pond and grows slower. Same Cypress trees in Reelfoot lake. Estimates are approximate....... unless you know all the history even stamped dates can mislead.
@@marionchase-kleeves8311 0.8 percent of the women (45 total) reported becoming pregnant without having vaginal sex. so how is it a myth. The oldest recorded mother to date to conceive was 74 years old. who told you it was a myth LOL
theirs three types of dating tho The three methods of dating are: relative dating, radiometric dating, and absolute dating. All methods of measurement - not just radiometric dating - can give wrong results if used incorrectly or inappropriately.
Four tenants of evolution. I am not aware of a single evolutionist who makes those claims. Therefore it is a strawman. Argue against evolution by all means it has its weak points. But please don't use arguments not help it just weekends your position.
@@anilkanda611 so when I do, you will either accept the evidence or rebut it? Good luck with that! Everything that follows is falsifiable, repeatable and easily calculated by anyone with basic math skills. His claim - the water released from the subterranean plates was equal in energy to, and I quote DIRECTLY, " a trillion billion atomic bombs" The surface of the globe is just over 510,000,000,000,000 square metres. Let's simplify it to 5 x 10 to the 14th. A trillion billion, divided by this number gives us an answer of 2,000,000. This means to match Coleman's claim, the energy is that of 2 MILLION atomic bombs on EVERY square metre of the globe. (The more accurate figure is 1.96 MILLION bombs worth of energy per square kilometre) The Hiroshima bomb, considered small (actually named "Little Boy") was 15 kilotons, or equivalent to 15,000 tons of TNT. Calculating this gives us the equivalent energy of 30 BILLION tons of TNT per square metre of earth surface. 1 cubic metres of TNT weighs approx 1.65 tons 30 billion divided by 1.65 means each metre of the earth would require a stack of TNT 18.1818 MILLION METRES high to produce equivalent energy. Is that enough evidence to show Coleman is outright lying?
It seems my evidence is too large for you @@anilkanda611. It doesn't seem to have published my calculations? Bottom line, a trillion billion atomic bombs of energy is equal to the energy from a pile of TNT 18.1818 MILLION metres high on every square metre of the earth's surface.
@@anilkanda611let me summarise incase my calculations don't show up. 510,000,000,000,000 square metres of earth surface into a trillion billion bombs of energy= 2 million bombs of energy per square metre. 1 Hiroshima bomb = 15 kilotons, times 2 million bombs per metre = 30 billion tons of TNT per square metre. At 1.65 tons of TNT per cubic metre leads to a pile 18 million metres high over the entire earth. You be the judge!
@@brentkindle6058 The same reason I don't offer anything to rebut some dude claiming he's a woman. How do you refute someone's fantasies? Science is utterly irrelevant to religious faith. If religious people can find some science that seems to support their position, they trot it out. If they find science that does not support their beliefs, they ignore or willfully refuse to grasp it. Religion is ultimately about faith, not logic, evidence, or the scientific method. Those are only fairweather friends for religious persons - to be applauded when they seem to positively support a belief, rejected when they seem to negatively affect their beliefs. Incidentally, I find some aspects of evolutionary theory highly suspect, and I'm an atheist. But my objections are on logical-evidential grounds which for me are absolutely not "fair weather friends."
The part about Noah's flood is one of the major issues I have with the Bible. If the genealogies in Genesis are correct, the flood would have occurred around 2348 BC. However, there were at least 4 major civilizations that existed at that time that were uninterrupted (Norte Chico, Egyptian, Sumerian, and Indus Valley). Also, if it happened at that time, then how did the civilizations get to the Americas? Either the flood was a localized event and was embellished in the Bible, or it didn't happen at all and is just a parable. And, if it was recorded by Moses, which people still aren't sure about, then it would have been recorded more than 1000 years after the flood, which gives the narrative plenty of time to be changed. Many of the books in the Old Testament are sketchy.
Parable??? with all those detailed measurements and specified materials? Even Jesus’ parables didn’t go to those lengths. If it were a myth Jesus was mistaken to refer to the days of Noah.
@@anilkanda611 Just goes to show that religion makes people who should know better lie then, doesn't it? Because this guy presented some of the worst out of date arguments. Evolution is a proven fact, and religion has shown in the past that it can absorb new information and adapt. This is no different.
Thank you for the opportunity to help us understand more Really Interview. God will reward you. It IS written that, men will hate you for my sake. So do not be too surprised. Do not be surprised that they hate God. And reject HIS Truth. They will all be very sorry. It would be sad but oh well. Their free choice
Those people argue that evolution is true because the God of the Bible isn’t true. That does not logically follow. Notice how they cannot argue for evolution without also contrasting it against Creationism. Take Creationism away and their arguments for evolution evaporate.
Why debate with people who are open atheists, claiming to be an atheist is claiming to know that there is absolutely no God. That is the most unintelligent claim ever, why argue with fools? To say there is no God is admitting yourself a fool. It takes more faith to be an atheist, what a weird religion.
Why debate with people who are open atheists, claiming to be an atheist is claiming to know that there is absolutely no God. That is the most unintelligent claim ever, why argue with fools? To say there is no God is admitting yourself a fool. It takes more faith to be an atheist, what a weird religion.
@@davemorrill2490 it’s always fascinated me the way you theists are so smug and condescending towards atheists as if not believing in magic and fairy tales is unreasonable.
@@notnero5280you believe nothing created everything and that order came out of absolute chaos. Still waiting for my laundry to fold itself in the dryer... Yeah that's not gonna happen just like a book doesn't write itself.
@@Mario_Sky_521 Go take a course in biology if you want to know how diversity flourished. As for the origin of life, nobody knows how life on earth got started--whether it's a common event in the universe or extraordinarily rare. But saying "God did it" is not an answer! It's simply a disguised way of saying you don't know.
@@anilkanda611 The U.S. constitution does not make a single mention of God, Jesus, the Bible, or Christianity. Not one single mention! We are not a "Christian Nation." We are a nation in which the majority of citizens are Christian. That's a very different thing. Our constitution is not "inspired by Christianity." In fact, it specifically says that government and religion are to be kept separate! And btw, if you're thinking of pointing to the alleged Christianity of the Founding Fathers, are you aware that Jefferson literally cut up his copy of the Bible and threw away all the parts he thought were ridiculous?
Funny how you thought I said christian nation. I never said such. However, christian principles of liberty and unalienable rights went into the crafting of the document. It was protestants and deists, and others who crafted the document. It was christians who came to this country to escape the Church of England. @@cufflink44
@@anilkanda611 "christian principles of liberty and unalienable rights" Yup, just like in Ephesians 6:5: "Slaves, obey your earthly masters with respect and fear, and with sincerity of heart, just as you would obey Christ." What a brave call for liberty! 😂 Also, you seem to think that Deists are Christians. They're not!
I looked him up and he has not a single science degree i could find , this is a blurb about his position in 2022-2023 i think "Coleman, who will teach Wills and Trust, most recently taught at the New Paltz State University of New York. Coleman has nearly a dozen publications on various research topics, including American politics, public law, political economy, religion and politics and Black politics. Coleman earned his JD from the University of Maryland at Baltimore, a PhD at the University of Chicago, and most recently, he finished his J.S.D. at Emory Law School. VERY IMPRESSIVE....BUT NOT A SINGLE BIT OF SCIENCE SEEMS TO BE INVOLVED IN HIS LIFE!!!!!
His science qualification is the Bible and his relationship with God. You must remember they claim God is the God of science. So in his world he is more than qualified as a scientist
So you lot mean to tell me before God so loved the world to the extent that he would give his only son to be violently assaulted and murdered to shed his blood, he actually committed a genocide on a global scale with a big big flood???? Now as a good Christian who is extolled (in Matthew 5:48 ) to be perfect like God, would you kill all your children who have become wayward in order to give yourself a new start?? Please dont answer to me. It's just food for thought for yourself. As a human with far less intellect and compassion than God, wouldn't the destruction of your children be the last thing on your mind as a solution, especially if you have the power to change/reform them just by the power of your own pronouncements? Now check this. The bible says, God REGRETTED for creating humans and decided to commit such an act as a solution to pervasive sin. And then after this act also he regretted again??? and the promised to never do so again using a rainbow as a sign of covenant? God killed everyone in a flood with the objective of dealing with pervasive sinfulness. Did it work? He burnt Sodom and Gomorrah too it never worked, He ordered the Amelikites to be assaulted women and children killed, that too never worked, He again resorted to the violent murder of his own child, and still! today there is pervasive sin. for ascribing such spectacular failure to God how long before you realized that all this could only be borrowed myth? How long? How fucking long? How low is your IQ?
Lol please tell me you actually watched the video. He literally points out several points to why there is a creator and creation. What's your stupid argument?
The funny part about every evolutionary model is that someone has to set it up and determine meaningful results. You can’t even separate the models from intelligent designing.
Any person who claims that he can debunk the science of evolution without doing any science, indeed, by preaching some religious philosophy in churches, is literally proving that he doesn't even understand basic logic. So much for this so-called "expert in logic." It's literally just another example of the silly, vacuous word games that creationists love to use in their religion-driven science-denialism.
It amazes me how the negation community in the comments believe they’re smarter than him by just being condescending I can guarantee they’ll lose any debate against him.
Here is one question for you. Do you like cats? Cats can't swim right? So how did they spread (along with any other non swimming animals) around the world after the flood? America's and Australia have no connection with Eurasia. Also why Kangaroos live only in Australia why so many inhabited island is full of fauna? Try to answer it yourself.
@@kingumwami1434You cannot be "proven" wrong if your position doesn't stand on racional arguments. How can you argue with someone who dismisses almost all of modern science and it's physical evidence?
The catch phrase to this video is misleading “…debunks evolution”, there is nothing in the videoclip that debunks evolution. Coleman at the start says there are three ways of deriving the truth - logic, science and vision. Unfortunately, logic can also lead to false conclusion. Take for example the simple logic construction A=B, B=C, therefore A must equal C. All animals have 4 legs, a table has 4 legs, therefore a table is an animal. A logically sound construct that led to a false conclusion. Just look at the many so called visions from famous “seers” and see how many of these came true, the statistic is not significant. Science with all its own challenges still remains one of humans most reliable method at deriving a probable truth within a confidence level. Science is not reliant on old documents (many of which are questionable including the Bible), what a person says is the truth, dogma, race, tribe, customs or traditions but involves rigour and a truth that can be independently confirmed or proven wrong by different people across the globe. Let’s look an other arguments put forward by Coleman for the truism of the Noah Ark story. Biblical scholars trace the origin of this story to Mesopotamia, in a genre of myth. The numbers cited in this Noah story, 120, 40 days and night, 300, 50, 3 levels, 6 (3 sons 3 wives = 33), 600 years, 8 people, etc, can be found in different cosmological derived stories of various cultures across the globe. I have written a book called Akashic Records and the Holy Grail, in this book I dedicate a chapter entitled “Divine Numbers” that discusses the persistency and meaning of various numbers found in various societies and the meaning thereof. It is said that it took Noah and family (8 in total (1 Peter 3:20) another mythological number also rendered as the infinity sign), 55 to 75 years to build the Ark, it is most likely the number 72 that it is related to Pythagoras’ famous theorem of a right angle triangle. The sins for which this god wanted to destroy the earth and all living creatures are because sons of god saw human females as fair and took them as wives and because of violence on earth. What does poor creatures have to do with human love/sex matters and human violence and have to suffer collective punishment. There is no genetic proof that all humans came from the Noah and his family family-tree. Coleman also does not understand animal diversity as linked to their habitat and thus geographic spread. For example the polar bear is found at the North Pole regions, the Panda in China, so Noah in the Middle East must have had an Alien spacecraft to travel the world to collect the different species? What amazes me most is the blatant illogical nonsense which you often found in so called religious texts, let’s look at the Bible, you have a god the is all might, can perform miracles, yet he needs weak people to carry out his will. If he is as might as is claimed, all he needed to do is gather all the animals he wanted to save at a specific place and destroyed the rest, why would he need an old man like Noah. Why is the miracles he performs so insignificant to the majority challenges facing nature and humans - what significance is the changing of water into wine when you had applauding slavery, and the then incurable diseases like leprosay (colonies of these people existed, it took science to cure this disease), endless wars and other ills of humans. I always laugh at the nonsense of Allah prohibiting the drinking of wine or alcohol and then you fined some Muslims taking drugs, and when you confront them their reply is that Allah only forbids alcohol not drugs! Of what value is the levitation of Buddhas monks!
Anil. I do not purport to know how our universe and material life came into existence. The chance theory versus creationist theory of the universe have a long history of debate. The chance theory is supported by some scientific observations whereas the creationist theory which is given as fact is only supported by religious dogma - because some religious texts says so therefore it is so. Different so called religious texts from different societies have their own versions of the creationist “theory” or shall we say creation myth. For example in the Bible, we have an old male deity (Jewish god) speaking the universe and life into being. The Hindus believe that everything always existed in a constant flux resulting in ever changing of one thing into another - the Wheel of Samsara. All effort must be made by humans to escape this endless cycle of reincarnation by becoming enlightened beings. In the ancient Egyptian belief system, Path , a ram-headed god created humans from clay on a spinning wheel. In other creation myth, a god sacrificed himself and out of this the entire universe was created. So which one of these stories is true and why chose one when all of them are based on dogma. Let’s turn to science and see what we know about the universe. The universe is about 14 billion years old with some new evidence suggesting it might be even more older. Life about 1 to 2 billion years, human species (the most destructive beings on planet earth who have created nuclear capabilities that can wipeout itself and all living things) about 1 to 2 million years old. Only about 5 percent of the universe is made of matter, about 95 of unknown (dark something and dark energy). Most of our scientific endeavours have been focused on understanding matter related issues but in roads are being made to understand the 95 percent. Quantum theory is assisting us to gain new insights into this “unknown” phenomenon. Let’s turn to living things and see what science has discovered. The elements that forms the building blocks of life was formed billions of years ago in the so called Big Bang theory. We have a fairly good understanding of all of these elements, identified in what we call the Periodic Table. Our fossil records show that the first life forms were simple single cell organisms and these evolved to form multicellular organisms. No religious text says anything about this but the Hindu text might hint at this saying that inorganic matter can transform into life. Inorganic matter can spontaneously associate to form complex structures, look at a snow flake or crystals as examples but what is still a massive unsolved problem is the question of what constitutes “life” and how and why would inorganic matter became “alive”. From a physics point of view, elements want to be at the lowest energy level, complexity demands higher energy levels and is thus unstable. There are still no definitive answers to these questions. We know that all life forms are made of nucleic acids (RNA and DNA). The famous Miller Experiment showed that under the right physical conditions simple inorganic elements can spontaneously associate to form simple chain macromolecules, strings of RNA and peptides. You did not need a deity to create these. It has also been discovered that celestial bodies like comets carry simple nucleic chains and so there is some suggestions that life may have arisen from these macromolecules. So what we call chance is far more complex than what the average Joe Blocks understand, yet, he is always the one who passionately argue, not based on facts but emotions, that the six-day creation story is true!
Anil. I do not purport to know how our universe and material life came into existence. The chance theory versus creationist theory of the universe have a long history of debate. The chance theory is supported by some scientific observations whereas the creationist theory which is given as fact is only supported by religious dogma - because some religious texts says so therefore it is so. Different so called religious texts from different societies have their own versions of the creationist “theory” or shall we say creation myth. For example in the Bible, we have an old male deity (Jewish god) speaking the universe and life into being. The Hindus believe that everything always existed in a constant flux resulting in ever changing of one thing into another - the Wheel of Samsara. All effort must be made by humans to escape this endless cycle of reincarnation by becoming enlightened beings. In the ancient Egyptian belief system, Path , a ram-headed god created humans from clay on a spinning wheel. In other creation myth, a god sacrificed himself and out of this the entire universe was created. So which one of these stories is true and why chose one when all of them are based on dogma. Let’s turn to science and see what we know about the universe. The universe is about 14 billion years old with some new evidence suggesting it might be even more older. Life about 1 to 2 billion years, human species (the most destructive beings on planet earth who have created nuclear capabilities that can wipeout itself and all living things) about 1 to 2 million years old. Only about 5 percent of the universe is made of matter, about 95 of unknown (dark something and dark energy). Most of our scientific endeavours have been focused on understanding matter related issues but in roads are being made to understand the 95 percent. Quantum theory is assisting us to gain new insights into this “unknown” phenomenon. Let’s turn to living things and see what science has discovered. The elements that forms the building blocks of life was formed billions of years ago in the so called Big Bang theory. We have a fairly good understanding of all of these elements, identified in what we call the Periodic Table. Our fossil records show that the first life forms were simple single cell organisms and these evolved to form multicellular organisms. No religious text says anything about this but the Hindu text might hint at this saying that inorganic matter can transform into life. Inorganic matter can spontaneously associate to form complex structures, look at a snow flake or crystals as examples but what is still a massive unsolved problem is the question of what constitutes “life” and how and why would inorganic matter became “alive”. From a physics point of view, elements want to be at the lowest energy level, complexity demands higher energy levels and is thus unstable. There are still no definitive answers to these questions. We know that all life forms are made of nucleic acids (RNA and DNA). The famous Miller Experiment showed that under the right physical conditions simple inorganic elements can spontaneously associate to form simple chain macromolecules, strings of RNA and peptides. You did not need a deity to create these. It has also been discovered that celestial bodies like comets carry simple nucleic chains and so there is some suggestions that life may have arisen from these macromolecules. So what we call chance is far more complex than what the average Joe Blocks understand, yet, he is always the one who passionately argue, not based on facts but emotions, that the six-day creation story is true!
This professor is a genius, I hope his students will listen to him. Considering that most professors now think there are more than two genders, this guy is a breath of fresh air.
Yea his lies are indeed ingenious, like that evolution would claim doghs and cats should be able to interbreed, when in reality that would disprove evolution. Guess being a lawyer helped him find lies that are easily believabler if you are clueless
The level of ignorance to hold this viewpoint is just astounding. The mountains and mountains for evolution are just so overwhelmingly large that the only way to feasibly deny it is to know nothing about it.
That was the assumption but now more and more scientists are coming forward. There are numerous reasons that you can investigate. As with any objective investigation, start with a clean slate and see what the evidence and arguments tell you.
And its definitely not ignorance. The scientists holding this view were trained in orthodox evolutionary theory but they were able to use objective thought to come to a different understanding. Orthodox evolution is an approach to ensure that there is no place for a Creator in the origins of life. There is, however, overwhelming evidence for an intelligent design of everything and hence the young earth approach.
That's false. There is ZERO evidence for macro evolution. Micro evolution is NOT the same thing as macro, there is a limit as to how far an organism can change. A bacteria will always be a bacteria, it will never evolve into something else. Cats will always be cats, fish will always be fish although there will be many different types of fish, and many different breeds of cats, dog will always be dogs. Apes will always be apes. (And whether you believe it or not we do not share a common ancestor with apes we are a special creation) The fossil evidence does not prove macro Darwinian evolution is true, it proves that it is false. If it were true there would be Trillions upon Trillions upon trillions upon Trillions of transitional fossils. There are ZERO transitional fossils despite what you have been taught. The DNA evidence does not prove that all life share a common ancestor it proves the opposite. The DNA evidence proves that it would be mathematically impossible for all life to share a common ancestor unless there was a Creator behind it. People say stupid thing like "we share 96% of our DNA with chimps." First of all that is false. Second people don't realize that that 4% difference is an ASTRONOMICALLY large amount of information in the DNA. So much so that it either did not happen because it would be mathematically impossible to happen by chance. Or an intelligent God was causing it to happen. It could not possibly happen by chance, and in fact it did not happen. The theory that all life shares a common ancestor is simply proven false to anyone who does not have blinders on their eyes. It's also similar to an archaeologist finding a tractor buried in a certain level of dirt, and then a Toyota Corolla found in another layer of dirt. So they date the tractor as 100,000 years older than the Toyota and say that the Toyota evolved out of the tractor. And share a common ancestor with the tractor because they both have four wheels, a steering wheel, headlights, ect. The tractor Cher's 95% of its DNA with the Toyota Corolla. That's how dumb the argument for Macro darwinian evolution is. What I mean by darwinian macroevolution is that all life supposedly evolved from a common ancestor.. People who believe that macro darwinian evolution is true believe it because they have been brainwashed to believe it. Ask someone to prove it to you and they can't. BECAUSE it's simply not true. You are simply going with the crowd.
Non life becoming life somehow with “time” is highly improbable. Looking up “the information sequence problem to the origin of replication” shows why this is.
He says time works against evolution (15:05), How is that? , yet previously, he said that you needed one type of dog to create different species of dog like coyote, wolves, dingo etc etc (13:00) that sounds and looks like evolution to me. He also claims the planet, solar system, universe is thousands of years old, but that time frame is not long enough to observe evolutionary changes although on that time frame evolution is still in progress. Evolution works on the billions of years time frame to SEE GREAT CHANGES IN ANY SPECIES. Beside we humans don't leave long enough to see these evolutionary changes. Everything is still evolving as we speak..... he claims the flood happened 2500 BC then the question is when was the ancient Egyptian civilization started? 3100 BC...yet we know after the ancient Egyptian empire came the ancient Greeks 1600 BC, then the Romans 753 BC, then the Byzantium empire 330. The histories are the evidence. At 23:00 he was asked if any other humans or animals could have survived the flood, he responded, '' absolutely not''' meaning nothing survived but at 29:40 when ask about insects on the ark he states that insects are hardy just like giants of the sea that were not on the ark but though many died some survived. But earlier nothing outside the ark survived. SMH....Your argument is porous, incongruent, slightly piggy backs on science and frankly misguided. keep trying creationists, you will find it increasingly difficult to defend that point of view as science provides more evidence with the passage of time...and you will still be stuck with the same old story of creation that has not moved one millimetre. I had a good laugh though.
Keep asking questions. You have much to learn. This earth is not evolving- it follows the second law of thermodynamics. The changing distance between the earth and the sun should be one very simple truth to demonstrate that the earth is not Billions oy years old (evolution is based on uniformitarianism).ruclips.net/video/rXexaVsvhCM/видео.html
He can't deny evolution itself because there are strong evidence for it (evolution of bacteria last few weeks, you don't have to wait millennia). What he says is he doesn't believe in evolution of one species into others. Dogs evolution from wolf to puddles lasted few tousends of years and it's scientific fact nobody denies. It was possible because it wasn't evolution triggered by natural selection. I'm not creationist but your argument with dogs is too weak. Better argument would be how did Kangaroos get to Australia and why there are no Kangaroos anywhere else if they departed Noe's ark in middle east?
Thank you! At las not all of the readers here are guillible. But let even look at the morality of the story since morals matter to them Before God so loved the world to the extent that he would give his only son to be violently assaulted and murdered to shed his blood, (John 3.16) he actually committed a genocide on a global scale with a big big flood???? so as Christians are extolled (in Matthew 5:48 ) to be perfect like God, would they emulate God and kill all their wayward children in order to give yourself a new start?? As humans with far less intellect and compassion than their God, if they had the power to change/reform their children just by the power of their own pronouncements wouldn't the killing of their children be the last thing on their mind as a solution? Now check this. The bible says, God REGRETTED for creating humans and decided to commit such an act as a solution to pervasive sin. And then what happened afterwards? He regretted again??? hahaha And then promptly promised to never do so again using a rainbow as a sign of covenant? SUMMARY God killed everyone in a flood with the objective of dealing with pervasive sinfulness. IT DIDNT WORK He burnt down Sodom and Gomorrah too with the objective of dealing with pervasive sinfulness. IT DIDNT WORK He ordered the Amelikites to be assaulted (women and children killed), with the objective of dealing with their pervasive sinfulness. iT DIDNT WORK He again resorted to the violent murder of his own child with the objective of dealing with pervasive sinfulness. IT DIDNT WORK TODAY TODAY TODAY THERE IS PERVASIVE SINFULNESS Now, for ascribing such spectacular failures to "God" supposedly a an all knowing being, how long before you all realized that all this could only be borrowed mythology? How fucking long? I believe there is a Creator of the Universe, but certainly not the one in the bible and quran doing some quixotic stuff including entering a bet with Satan to destroy Job to show Satan that he is the boss.
building blocks for life is very fragile, it won't wait millions of years keep shuffleling until become functional, it will decompose. how it was gradualy formed while it's gradually decomposed?
@@yodaheabebe3756 ["stop condescending. State ur counter point. Don't just signal idiocy"] My counter-point here is crystal clear. I'll try to dumb in down for you. Trying to argue the age of the earth is determined by the age of a tree is complete idiocy. Do you really need an explanation why? Apparently you do. Trees, like other living things, are reproducing. The grow from seedlings, create more seedlings, and ultimately die. The fact that a tree is living in no way implies the age of the earth, any more than looking at the oldest living person would indicate the age of the earth. Good lord.
@iriemon1796 No you're being dum on purpose here. He clearly spoke about multiple lines of evidence here to support his claim of young earth. He just brought up the oldest tree to show that we don't find anything older than that to show for absolute certainity that it lived longer. you're making look as if that's ALL he said, he's just adding that to support his other claims.
I am always surprised by the number of people who are thirsty to listen to a storyteller even though everything he says is lies. Creationism is a story, not history.
ICR proposes, Noah took livestock on board since clean animals were 7 pairs not 2, Animals were younger, or they hibernated. All possible since the Lord led them on the Ark.
@@anilkanda611 No one in their right mind can believe that two kangaroos left Australia to reach the Middle East and return to Australia to repopulate the entire continent. It is a tribal story for a primitive tribe with a primitive worldview. It cannot be taken literally
@@anilkanda611 yeah sure. Here is an article about the age of the earth, Patterson, C., paper at a Conference on Application of Nuclear Processes to Geological Problems at Geneva, Wis., Sept. (1953). If the Major has some data published in any peer reviewed paper please provide the link for his paper. I will be happy to read the paper about his conclusions on the age of the Earth.
Thanks for the dialogue. I do not hold to his ideas of the age of the earth. I frankly don't know and or desire to but the age of life, I have contention. For example, the amount of living tissue specimens that been recently discovered present challenges to traditionally thought models of long spans for evolutionary model to work. "Soft-tissue preservation in terrestrial Mesozoic vertebrates -Mary H. Schweitzer et al. "Molecular preservation in Late Cretaceous sauropod dinosaur eggshells- Jasmina Wiemann et al. "The record of microbially mediated redox reactions spanning 2,000 meters of sediment" -Gordon D. Love et al. @@Dannydreadlord
@@theatheistcowboy4227 Context on this one matters. None of us have physically seen Jesus. That would mean every living Christian is doing it wrong. Or,... Or maybe you just need a little more understanding. He was talking to Thomas about his doubts. Thomas was the only one who had not seen him alive after his crucifixion. It's not a call to blind faith...
@@christinebridges4212 I'm sure it's impressive from a carpentry point of view. The problem is that it reinforces the false world view of fundamentalist creationists like Ken Ham. There was no flood. That is beyond a proven fact. The flood has been disproven using every discipline of science. Evolution is settled science. There is no scientific argument against it. The world is not thousands of years old it's billions. Dinosaurs did not live alongside humans. These are all objective realities about the world that Ken Ham is in denial about.
2 Peter 3 In the last days scoffers will come denying the global flood. Matthew 24 In the last days lawlessness will increase and the hearts of many will grow cold.
It’s very unfortunate that those who disagree with what Major Coleman said seem to belittle or degrade him rather than submit counterpoints. It does not make someone less intelligent for submitting a different viewpoint from you, if your viewpoint is as superior as you claim, it should be nearly effortless to convince them to your “truth”. It doesn’t cost anything from us to be kind to one another and we need it most when we disagree.
He thinks cats and dogs should be able to breed if evolution was true (it would falsify evolution). He thinks abiogenesis is part of the theory of evolution. He basically understands nothing, and is just arguing against a strawman. Incompetence or malice is of course hard to judge. Probably he is more willfully ignorant.
I am not saying he has to accept evolution for me to respect his opinion on it. But he has to understand it. He does not. And we are not talking "he got a few details wrong". No, we are in the 2+2=5 level of ignorance here.
@@lmoelleb abiogenesis has historically been part of the theory of evolution.
Evolutionary theory is an attempt to explain the origin of species through natural means without supernatural Creation. Logically, unless you concede the existence of God and subscribe to theistic evolution in order to explain the origin of life (a position that has been shown to be unsustainable), abiogenesis must have originally occurred in order to commence the process of Darwinian evolution. Abiogenesis is required by evolution as the starting point.
The growing trend among evolutionists today to attempt to sidestep the problem of abiogenesis by contending that evolution has nothing to do with the origin of life, but rather is a theory which starts with life already in existence and explains the origin of all species from that original life form is either intellectually dishonest, agenda driven or just brainwashed indoctrination.
@@lmoellebexplain a single point where he was wrong?
@@lmoellebhe quite literally described what evolution and macroevolution is 😂😂😂😂 and how illogical it is.
@@lmoellebhow can you not link Abiogenesis to evolution when evolution relies on creation being non-life to life doofus…?
Try google searching him in the UK… Even Wikipedia is not found… hardly anything comes up for him……. WOW!! the liberties to silence truth is real….
Interesting. That’s crazy
Liar! You can find all his stuff online and on Wiki.
I am so happy to see this! He use to come to my house for dinner after church! A long time ago.
I grew up Catholic and was taught to only have “blind faith” and not question any of the Church’s doctrines. When I went to university I was quickly indoctrinated into Secular Humanism. I took so many philosophy of religion courses that I had an unofficial minor in it! (Of course, not one single class was taught by anyone of faith - all were taught by Atheists.)
It wasn’t until almost 2 decades later when I was 37 years old that I was actually exposed to Apologetics. That is, the evidence for belief in God. But even more succinctly, the truth that Yahweh, the one true God and Creator of the universe loved His creation (humanity) so much that he humiliated Himself by becoming one of us. This was foretold in multiple scriptural prophecies.
He lived with us, He loved us, He taught us the true meaning of the Torah, Tanakh, and other scriptures and most importantly… He died in the most humiliating and tortured way while taking the sins of the world upon Him. After this, He was resurrected and defeated death itself for any and every person who chooses to accept this gift of salvation. I truly believe that anyone who honestly seeks truth will find it in the One who is Truth.
Jesus did not die for your sins and was treated the same as any other criminal of his day
Excellent
@@captaingaza2389Citation?
Hi Lisa, your story can be true. But to say being a Catholic is to follow the truth of the faith blindly can't be true. May be you were young at that time when you were told just to have faith in God. However, Catholicism is the most developed and highly sophisticated form of Christianity because it's of Christ. It can't be anything else. Right before Luther came, Catholicism was 1500 years old. And that means the Church has examined and thought about the truth for 1500 years. Indeed, betrayal and corruption, just like Judas, was and still is part of Church. As unacceptable as it is, it doesn't change the fact that Catholicism, with it's younger sister Church in Orthodox, is the only faith that is of Christ and Christ of God.
@@captaingaza2389Jesus died for all mankind, and He is God.
Father God, Thank You so much for men like this. You are so AMAZING.
Amazing? Debatable. Right? No.
What you mean? god sending people that talk about a subject that they don't know 😂😂😂
Strange, I never thought any god, especially not the Christian God, sends people who participate in and promote the deadly sin of lies.
@@Astrobrant2 lol everyones not dumb like you
@@zemestukami4189 My, what a mature, scholarly remark!
“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, and against the worldly gouernours, the princes of the darkenesse of this worlde, against spirituall wickednesses, which are in ye hie places.” Ephesians 6:12 Geneva Bible version
He was absolutely correct about having a duty stand against evils.
So biological and geological science is an evil to you?
Just as hard to wrestle against ignorance and willful ignorance at that.
☦❤🕊
Facts
@@Rudolf-x7m some people are extremely foolish. They usually do not know who they are, and most of the time they think they're wise. 🤷🏼♂️
"A war of ideas" So true. I grew up in the church and was bombarded on all sides by what we might cal today memes casting doubt on Christianity. I always believed in God, but like many people I was filled with doubts and unanswered questions. It's only with the help of RUclips that I have finally solidified my faith in Jesus, and the Bible. Yes, I watch debates, I listen to competing theories. There are a lot of good sounding theories, but they all fall apart when taken as a whole. Yet, the Bible continues to outshine all other theories when properly examined.
Well said. May the Lord bless all who call on Him, and to the ones He has yet to call on.
If you are believing book that has been manufactured by man then you are indeed a gullible person. Much has been written about the bible and its true authors .... you only have to google and read. Spoiler alert: No one is coming to save you, me or the family next door ..... wars will come and go like famine in the 21st century. Man is basically a barbarian wearing a suit.
When properly examined the Bible is simply a story book. The story of Noah’s ark is just one that has many problems
I find that most people I meet do not want to think critically or deeply about anything. Caught up in the superficial.
@@ob1coyote most of us get I doctrinated into religion from a young age and start from the presupposition of the faith to accept or reject information presented to us. I was like this for 30 years. Then I made an effort to read and study and work from the evidence out to a reasonable explanation instead and this revealed the weakness of the bible.
Unbelievably well spoken. How have I never heard of him?!?
I know!!! This is mindblowing
Glory to the Lord. May God bless this man.
Please dear sir, write a book. Please publish a book that will be accessible to all and will be available long after you’re gone. You have a wealth of wisdom and knowledge. Please immortalize it by publishing.
You mean write a paper, for a peer reviewed journal. Anyone can write a book.
@@kosgothWhere do you think what he is refuting comes from?
@@prn72271 idk probably an echo chamber . not a paper published in a scientific journal that's for sure.
Yes, write a book so you can publish your unchallenged falsehoods.
Don't write a scientific paper where your beliefs can be blown apart by evidence.
Please keep preying on the scientific ignorance of your audience to keep reaping in that money.
Not bad for a high school dropout!
I recommend any book by Dr Jonathan Sarfati, Refuting Evolution, The Greatest Hoax on Earth A Refutation of Dawkins' Greatest Show on Earth, By Design, and his commentary, The Genesis Account.
I love this episode ❤
After all these years traveling the universe of the media searching for truth here it is taught I was alone but yet here I found living faith wow!!! I was blown away not because I am black but because someone believe in science and faith wow!!! just wow!!
Well God is perfect creator so his creation can be scientifically explained
I believe in God, Jesus Christ, Creationism and I'm a Scientist
I'm so honored to see my professor on screen. Truly humbled. ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
I wish I pursued your wisdom knowledge and understanding before graduating. God bless you, Professor Coleman.
Your professor is a moron
You should be embarrassed by his scientific ignorance....
@user-xp4fm2st8u then why don't you go up and debate with your evidence? Instead of trolling comments, show what you got. At least he chose to risk his name and rep... don't hide behind a screen and a random user name. Go up and debate it if you're so well versed.
@@snollennubecause literally every point Coleman or any creationist has brought up has been debunked a billion times over. Why don't you get out of an echo chamber and try to demonstrate your beliefs & claims.
@cwillis92 Oh wow, it looks like someone is big-mad. Can't argue with you. 🤣🤣🤣 Well, you know that Professor Coleman has reward money for anyone who was willing to debate him on his research and prove him wrong. You should go show your "billions of times" research, surely you could win the money. You surely got more credentials than the university professors who disagree but never showed. Go on now, let's see whose behind the screen debunking scholars...
For the record when a person inflates the reality of their claims like "billions," "every," and "echo chamber," its usually due to them not being confident in their own statement and needing to exaggerate it to make it appear greater than it is to make it sound credible or strong. Hopefully that helps... 🤷🏿♂️🤷🏿♂️🤷🏿♂️
Amen and Amen! God still has His people! He will never leave us groping in darkness! Hallelujah!!!
Hmm, seems to me you are groping in the darkness. Read a science book, see the light!
@@hongotedesco8931 take your own advice and read the bible before you knock it as BS. also if you blindly follow what scientists that are payed to spin a narrative say your shooting yourself in the foot.
I wish professor was my lecturer in Jurisprudence, maybe I'd have continued pursuing my law degree. Lol, I was in Africa though. My lecturer told us to forsake God if we were believers. Sadly, many did stop believing. I chose my faith; it was a constant battle between my faith and the philosophers whose arguments I had to read and vouch for lol.
You folks worship your masters imaginary god
@hzkelly I'd sure like a lecture in jurisprudence..
Kudos to your lecturer for trying to save you from wasting your brain. That is something we rarely see in Africa. His efforts were in vain but he tried.
God doesn't seem to like AFRICA 😆😆😆
It's amazing that you stood your ground, I pray you continue to do so and that God will strengthen and bless you
Amen 🙏🏾 thank you spread the truth
I'm a game dev. I can make a simple universe in a weekend. I can program the "natural processes" like erosion for example. I don't even need to be present once I execute. With enough time, knowledge and power I could sim our universe to the atom. I would be the watch maker. My simulated humans could have free will to choose. I can give them attributes before they are conceived that I would be completely aware of. I could make my universe scale to full in 6 in game days with the appearance of thousands. None of this would be random unguided processes. Even if it appeared so to my sims. The best part? Trying to make them understand my world and their place would be quite challenging. I would be beyond their understanding.
I'm a highschool dropout. If I can do this....
Imagine what's out there beyond what people claim to know. How many true things are beyond the reach of your senses? Magnetism, electricity, DNA, radiation are all discoveries, excavated from reality. None are scientific inventions. We don't even know what gravity is or how it works.
The fool says there is no God, sitting in their little corner of infinity.
Random natural unguided processes?
Pure fantasy. It's a joke. The evidence is blinding if you have the courage to actually consider it.
( edit: My responses won't show. My fundamental claim is that it is feasible the universe is created. Multiple overlapping contingent systems are likely not accidental. How many perfect dice rolls (back to back) are you willing to believe are "strange coincidences". What sum = proof? )
🥇
Well said. All discoveries are just waiting to happen. But men would rather praise themselves than praising He who made it be. They rather give credit to randomness in order to exalt their ego. The fool said in their heart there's no God. Their "wisdom" is turned into foolishness.
Lol in my 40 years of being a Christian, and I consider myself a devoted scientist, I love your post :-).
Last but not least, I have not looked but is there a Sim Universe out there? I also was a software developer but not your caliber, but I have thought it would be cool to have an object oriented DNA creation simulator, have not looked for one of those either.
Whatever can be imagine can be created. The laws of physics keeps changing because what is imagined, and manifests from imagination, the laws of physics have to alter, and expand to account for the impossible stuff of imagination.
@@fibo12358 Thanks. I appreciate it. I don't think those sims are available, .... Yet.
I love when people who clearly have no idea what they’re even arguing against think that they’re going to disapprove the most sound scientific theory in the field of biology. As if they who don’t even understand the theory, see something that people who have studied it for the vast majority of their lives, didn’t see. it would be downright hilarious if only it didn’t mislead even more people into thinking they know what the theory of evolution even proposes, let alone that it’s been debunked.
And I see plenty of people on here who think they’re going to argue that this law professor has all the facts straight about what the theory of evolution is, and says should happen according to said theory. Let me make it clear now: he could not be more objectively incorrect. He does not understand what the theory of evolution is or says. If you were to spout this in a base level college biology class, he would probably be corrected by freshman in the first two minutes of speaking, and it would only get worse from there.
Yet evolutionists have largely avoided debates with creationist , and when they have agreed the weight of scientific evidence to support creationism has invariably overwhelmed them . Why ? Because the evolutionists theories don't stand up to empirical scrutiny !!!
Well said. This video has me gobsmacked in its ignorance. And people just lap it up. Faith scares the crap out of me.
Evolutionism is a tautology and therefore false.
Amen Sis Major.
God bless you and your work
I am genuinely interested in learning how Professor Coleman explains why the age determination by the Radiocarbon 14 Method (which seems to measure time periods far greater than 6000 years) yields incorrect results. - As I said: honestly interested.
He has a website where he responds to these questions. Power station something?
It's the rate that carbon "expires". There was a science book I took in Classical Conversations that had a zebra on the front that explained the nitty gritty of this very thing! It specifies the math etc. I don't remember the details but I remember it being very exacting!
I remember the science being called stoichiometry. I LOVED it!
Classical Conversations is a homeschooling group.
me too!!
Anil (and team), this is the first time in my life seeing this show - had no idea it existed. Compliments on your presenting (and the team's hard work), you're doing a fine job - Praise God. Love from 🇿🇦
SAME HERE!!!!
Same with me, and I am also South African.. 🤝🤝😒🤞👍
So the "expert" asked people to come forward with science and "prove we are wrong".
This shows a NON scientist, with zero idea of the scientific method wants to prove a negative - an impossibility inthe scientific method!
Then we see the "expert" has ZERO qualifications in science - yes, an appeal to authority by me initially, but when we have already shown he doesn't understand science it gains credibility!
Here it is again- a RUclips commentator saying what is and what is not science.
@@anilkanda611 it's pretty simple. Science requires falsifiable evidence, repeatable and testable evidence, and be supported by the data. Opinion means NOTHING in science, just like guesses. It also means that if you don't know, you don't make stuff up.
Sir, like most of your comments on here, you make opinion based comments with no substance. I'm happy to provide citations but as you would well know, RUclips does not allow me to vote them.
And for a lawyer to make "scientific" claims that he doesn't support with evidence simply enforced my point.
He is a well known apologist with a reputation for claiming science when there is none.
Address my comment on the "energy of a trillion billion atomic bombs" to show you have even a little understanding of the ridiculous claims he makes.
@@anilkanda611 but you just presented a LAWYER claiming to present science while giving you no evidence for his claims!
What even is a trillion billion🤔 and at 42Pj per nuke if he meant a billion trillion (or sextillion) then that is likely to be very damaging to the planet, like so damaging a wooden boat with 3 foot thick reinforced walls would be destroyed like match sticks, this is a REALLY BIG force that has been claimed so big a sizable quantity of material would be ejected into space!
Beautiful overview of some great mysteries of Scripture. Thank you.
Glad you enjoyed it! *please subscribe for more
WOW!!! To God be all the Glory Amen ❤❤❤
Amen
Amen
Thank you. This was so interesting and makes me realize what a wonderful God we worship. 🙏🙏🙏🙏
major coleman is awesome with his teaching thank god we still have minds like this on earth
Finally someone who speaks the knowledge of God and not scientists!! Lues told that the world is millions of years old....a definite falsehood. AMEN
There is Epic of Gilgamesh . How do you explain that Major ?
The Epic of Gilgamesh and Genesis may just stem from the same historical event, that's why they are similar. Both stories have an ark, but the one described in Genesis is seaworthy, the one in the Epic of Gilgamesh is not. Also, just because the Epic of Gilgamesh may be older doesn't mean it's the source for Genesis.
@@Meow-xx6oo Gilgamesh must be a giant giving his side of the story.
Remember they were destroyed yet some survived, as Genesis 6 says there were giants before the flood and after that. Therefore some must have survived in something unsubmersible of sort, the story of Enki tells exactly that. The so called mythologies are various tales from the perspective of these "men of renown", caried over and embellished by the "loosers"
In any case these giants/nephilim give credit to the genesis account, even from their twisted mind, we gather that the flood was reaL, it's the TRUTH and that's what matters.
Let's choose who we follow.
Foolishness
Next up, we'll have a plumber discuss the illogical nature of Muslim beliefs. Stay tuned.
Next up, RUclips keyboard warrior thinks they alone know who’s qualified to talk about anything. ^
@@anilkanda611 you don't need to be qualified to understand the amount of nonsenses in this video.
@@discograficogenuinely curiou5...what are some examples?
Thank you for uploading this! So much good stuff in such a short video ❤
Thank you so much for this explanation. I hope everyone that's confused about God follows your advice! 🙏🙏🙏
When we see a metropolis, we think of the architects. When we look at the intricate inner workings of a swiss watch, we think of the watch-maker. When we look at the immensely complicated machinery of the human cell, which works like a metropolis & swiss watch on the molecular level, we think of the Architect & Watch-Maker, not random processes.
And the only reason you think of the architect and the watchmaker is because of the overwhelming amount of physical evidence that you can see, touch,and witness for yourself that leaves you with no other choice Then to be convinced humans are Responsible for not only the creation of the watch and the building but These creations of human beings have evolved from the very simple, As is the case with the human created sun dial, to the very complex human created Rolex wristwatch.
The very simple mud and grass hut shelters, To the very complex skyscraper.
For the bible tells me so is not evidence that a character from a book Created Anything.
@@RobertSmith-gx3mi what you've presented is overly simplistic sophistry. Do we necessarily need to 'see, touch' or feel something to know it's real? No, we don't. Does something need to be tangible to be real? No, it doesn't.
90% of the universe is made up of something called dark matter which we can't 'see', feel, 'touch' or even measure directly (it has to be measured indirectly from the speed of light & is so subtle that it hardly exerts gravity). Yet it is real and in abundance in the universe.
Simple mud huts? Sure. Fact is, simple or complex, someone still made them. They are created. So, I'm really unsure what your argument is.
@@RobertSmith-gx3mimud huts didn't evolve into skyscrapers 😂 There were intelligent creative beings building them. ☦❤🕊
@@skunkape5918 The evolution of the building from hut to skyscraper was a play on words meant to highlight the evolving complexity, style, and artistic design of the humam amimal.
@@RobertSmith-gx3mi i understand what you were going for. Peace 🕊
I serve a God who created the universe. Praise to Jesus Christ 🙏🏾
Amen! Thats right
Also, it took 100 years to build (one guy! Maybe his sons helped),
When people asked “what are you doing?”
He said “building an arc because when it’s done, God is gonna make it rain and flood the planet!”
Rain? What is rain?
(It had never rained previously.)
They laughed at him!
100 years of mockery!
When he pulled the door closed the rain began.
It covered every mountain.
No more mockery!
Today, we’re at it again.
Mind you, anyone who believed could get in the boat.
Nobody believed!
Global unbelief is not a strange thing.
Christ is the new Moses type!
Anyone who wants in the boat is welcome.
Anyone who wants to stand with the mockers is welcome to do so also.
Free choice!
Mostly true, except that Noah did not pull the door shut. Angels did that.
I believe Methuselah was one of those who helped in the construction.
Amazing details you can all spout for something that never actually happened.
Too bad that the ENTIRE WORLD, with the exception of Israel, never experienced or historically recorded this " worldwide" flood !!!
Nowhere does it say anywhere that anyone else was welcome. The story literally say as build an ark for you and your family. As far as we know, no one else was welcome.
@hdmaragh This is true.
God decided to murder (the BIG hypocrite) every man, woman, child, and baby on Earth, including nearly all of the animals and plants, except for Noah's family!
Science denial is so pathetic. Dude didn't debunk shit.
"God never asker for blind faith. It's always based on evidence." - Love this statement.
God’s wisdom was poured into this professor’s brain😍
He's a Law professor with an undergrad's understanding of biology....whatchutalkin bout....Katie?
@@daviddavenport9350lol. Then take him on. You can win $20000!!!!! Go for it!
Although... I know you wont.
You can see it from the start. This guy is REALLY smart.
@@daviddavenport9350what's your degree in?
He's a Law professor with an undergrad's understanding of biology and I have a degree in engineering. I would not try to explain law to this man and I don't expect him to explain biology to me or anyone else unless he is qualified in that field. He is explaining a belief he has, if I was explaining a belief I had in something that was concerned with the law and getting it wrong I would expect to be called out for it by people with knowledge and not by people with beliefs.
Only fools, say in their hearts, there is no God. Fools.
Yes it's the most obvious truth.*Dont forget to like and subscribe for more content! Thank you friend
Circular reasoning and special pleading doesn't excuse your piggish prudence. Thank you for removing all doubt of your bias sycophant.
If you can’t see that this interaction is scripted and acted out, like a bad infomercial, then you are absolutely brain dead. 😂
Ridiculous. It was not. I was there.
I've been to the Kentucky Ark that Ken Hamm's group constructed and it is very impressive.
I believe you and i also believe that's were everything should end at impressive. Nothing more nothing less. What they built is impressive but proves nothing
@@ntsokolomemani3874Then clearly you haven’t been. That ark is literally full of evidence. Sticking your head stubbornly in the sand does not count as counter evidence.
But is it as impressive as the Duripinar site in Turkey on the mountains of Ararat. Mountains being plural in scripture concerning Noah's Ark. Not only are the dimensions spot on, but ground penatrating radar showed right angles and the look of compartment remnants. It's certainly no mere rock formation. I hope to go soon. The Turkish government conducted these tests, and they even made a visitor center. The length is exact in royal Egyptian cubits, as Moses would have known, while the width is a little wider since ancient boats will splay. If the writer of the ancient story made it up by the boat shaped object's dimensions, it would have been these wide measurements. Instead it conforms with reality. Not to mention all the holed anchor stones dropped in the area, up in the mountains.
This is POWERFUL… i am a preacher, but I learned a lot from this anointed professor
You learn how to lie and spread bible bullshit
It's like learning how to build a house from a chef. 😅
@@lionzion1879you are saying that because you didn't hear the falsehood you want to hear...if you have a better argument come out and debunk his claims the prize money is still available for grab 😅😅😅
Nothing can create nothing but Nothing 😮.
@@lionzion1879 yes because you must first go pay to get indoctrinated before you know something 😂😂
@@fadaelviz7212 prize money? It's all for show, it's not worth the money when debating idiocy.
Straw man arguments and ignorance doesn’t prove evolution is wrong. It does prove that the speaker is ignorant of the subject.
5:20 He says that revelation from god is _science??_
This man is no expert in critical thinking.
Says the guy who thinks billions of years of chance formed the solar system. Tell us more about critical thinking
@@anilkanda611
And why the Solar system couldn't form by natural causes?
@@anilkanda611 I suppose it could be called chance, but the solar system formed from a cloud of interstellar gas and dust. (Mostly hydrogen). An accretion disk developed around the central mass which was condensing into the sun. Gravity caused clumps to form in the accretion disk. As they got larger their gravity increased and most of the rest of the debris was pulled into them. These became the planets. We have seen this process taking pace in other star systems. When the central mass gets hot enough it is called a protostar. Further gravitational collapse eventually triggers nuclear fusion at the core. That's when it becomes a star.
One principle of critical thinking is accepting verifiable facts. Everything I just described is entirely consistent with what we observe in our own solar system and a handful of others that can be observed from a great distance. Go to Wikipedia and read about stellar evolution.
A building has a builder, a painting has a painter, and yet the most sophisticated creation, life, occurred spontaneously from nothing.
@@Sola_Scriptura_1.618
No. Science has never said that anything came from nothing!
I like what this man is doing.
He’s not a pastor collecting tithes and offering.
He has distinguished himself from other by embarking on a unique journey that will make people remember him after he’s long gone.
I am not a pastor, and i collect nothing, but I will try to share honoring tithes and offerings. I give tithes and offerings because these are needed for the church( not the building but the body) to function and work on reaching everyone with the gospel. If you are a true ambassador of the Kingdom of God, you will be looking at where to give tithes and offerings, because your business is to promote God's kingdom.
Now when you don't tithe, this is not sin, but those who tithe without are making a covenant with God since God is a God of covenant. So even though not tithing is not a sin, those who tithe get the benefit those who don't will not get. it is like going to the gym improves your health while those who don't go don't have the benefit of those who go. Of course, any pastor or man of God forcing you to tithe is wrong. but please let us understand well what tithing and offerings are before speaking against them in general.
Tithing and offering are spiritual exercises of faith. and God sees all those who do it and the reason in their hearts and reward everyone according to their motives
You don’t think pastors should be paid for teaching, preaching, leading people to Christ, counseling and being available for service 24/7? Dr. Coleman seems to think so.
@@PastorBrianBetsworth no I don't think pedophiles should be paid to abuse children
So you lot mean to tell me before God so loved the world to the extent that he would give his only son to be violently assaulted and murdered to shed his blood, he actually committed a genocide on a global scale with a big big flood????
Now as a good Christian who is extolled (in Matthew 5:48 ) to be perfect like God, would you kill all your children who have become wayward in order to give yourself a new start?? Please dont answer to me.
It's just food for thought for yourself.
As a human with far less intellect and compassion than God, wouldn't the destruction of your children be the last thing on your mind as a solution, especially if you have the power to change/reform them just by the power of your own pronouncements?
Now check this. The bible says, God REGRETTED for creating humans and decided to commit such an act as a solution to pervasive sin. And then after this act also he regretted again??? and the promised to never do so again using a rainbow as a sign of covenant?
God killed everyone in a flood with the objective of dealing with pervasive sinfulness. Did it work?
He burnt Sodom and Gomorrah too it never worked,
He ordered the Amelikites to be assaulted women and children killed, that too never worked,
He again resorted to the violent murder of his own child, and still! today there is pervasive sin.
for ascribing such spectacular failure to God how long before you realized that all this could only be borrowed myth? How long? How fucking long?
We the followers are the church.not a building.give to the needy. That's what God said
AWESOME!!!!! God bless this man of God!
So noone from the evolutionary studies group showed up on a Saturday morning, therefore the bible is true and evolution is false.
Wow, wow.
The explanatory depth is awesome.
We thank God for this man.
*Please like and subscribe to this channel for more content! Thank you friend.
Interesting, Dr. Coleman being a law professional is "debunking" Evolution! We'll wait next year, he'll sure get his Nobel Prize and teachings on talking snakes and how to stone women will be taught in schools thanks God!! What whole lotta baloney!!! 💩💩💩💩💩💩💩💩
Funny. Like Stalin, Like Mao, Like Pol Pot, ..oh wait, those tyrants were all atheists.*Dont forget to like and subscribe for more content. Thanks friend.
@@anilkanda611
And all of them were creationists… just like Hitler.😉
@@anilkanda611
Not answering the point says everything about you...
Talking snakes, and also life coming from nothing. You forgot about that crazy worldview, oh my bad, that’s what you believe. So a talking snake is crazy but life coming from non life is not crazy?
the interviewer is really good at his job
Thanks!
I agree, he allows for a natural flow and doesn’t get in the way of the topic or make it about himself! His technique should be studied and copied!
@@michaelsmith7995 true
I see the bar is very low here. All you have to do is to claim there is a God
Similar to atheists claiming the universe created itself. @@ntsokolomemani3874
Simply Put: GOD SPOKE THROUGH THIS MAN. That is what i can say.
How do you know this with this degree of certainty?
"GOD SPOKE THROUGH THIS MAN."
Which is why he was wrong.
I can say a literal snake spoke through him, but it doesn't make it true.
That explains how we got everything about evolution wrong. Either he is ignorant on it, or he lied to fool his creationist followers.
If you have committed the philosophical suicide of religious belief you really aren't in a position to ' debunk ' anything.
If one has a basic understanding of science and faith based religions, one would understand the folly of arguments around faith based ideas vs scientific discovery.
Faith involves blind obedience and rigid adherence to the doctrine.
Science involves the search for answers that can be updated once a better understanding is achieved.
You don't debunk Science, just update the answers as more information becomes available.
This is why religions are static and scientific advancement is fluid.
I wish more religious people would understand what Faith actually means.
Science believed Lobotomies should be standard practice at one time.
Ive been a Young Earth Creationist since '98 not long after I got Born Again.
In those 26 years atheists have not come up with any new evidence or arguments for evolution.
If anything, we have discovered even more complexities in the cell like interactomes which make Darwinian Chemical evolution even more impossible.
I love this model of Noah's Ark, there's also a man in Denmark, Johan Huibers in Dordrecht, Netherlands. who actually built a full scale model of the Ark which took him 20years.
Why were you expecting atheists to give you proof for evolution? Were the early contributors to evolution atheists? Are microbiologists atheists? Evolution is a scientific fact it has absolutely nothing to do with atheism. Evolution theory is supported by atheists and theists. Ironically everyone that opposes Evolution is a theist. That is a good pointer to the group with an agenda
Keep talking out your ass -
This man is awesome
True. An awesome comedian
The Irony of a Law professor rejecting Evolution when Creationism and ID have lost in court several times as "not science" isn't lost on me.
@@kosgoth
Why is it that you feel the need to minimize others in order to make a point? Also, how is a lawyer debating an opposite position ironic? In my opinion, he seems to be the perfect person for the job. He has all the proper training to prove his point. All it would take is researching both sides and comparing the evidence. There is a lot of creationist scientist in the world that rejects evolution, so the data is there for a good debate.
So a judge concluding that the “intelligent design claim had no scientific merit” and could not “uncouple itself from religion” is somehow enough proof for you? You don’t think it took an intelligent designer to create all the order and precision in our universe? from the molecular level to the order of the galaxies? But somehow taking God out of it and saying we’re all here by accident/chance is somehow science.
Evolution has a lot of holes in its theory. For example, there’s no fossil evidence for the intermediary stages of any species on Earth.
How does the universe arises from nothing and then explodes in a bang?
Where did the energy come from for the explosion to take place?
Where does consciousness come from?
How are we able to discover math in an accidentally created universe?
umm sound like a religion to me lol
But the bible doesn’t get enough credit. Once upon a time, people claimed a flat earth rested on top of elephants. The Bible always claims it to be a circle/sphere (Isaiah 40:22) and suspended on nothing (Job 26:7) before anyone. If you think about it, evolution is only popular today because of indoctrination. Most of us are taught to believe it from a very young age and it would be taboo to refute it.
@@inboxmail2053 If you say so...
Because he is a lesser. So are the people that accept this nonsense, just like flat Earthers.
These claims are known by the relevant scientists and they know they are meritless. eg. Entropy refers to usable energy in a system. not complexity, we get energy from the sun via plants. Evolution doesn't violate that. A living body or set of bodies, or species etc, isn't an enclosed system. The Prof is wrong. I could go on every point but that would be a major response.
Any of these topics are available on the internet.
pewresearch Darwin Day 6 from 2019
Scientists overwhelmingly agree that humans evolved over time, and most Americans are aware that this is the case. Among scientists connected to the American Association for the Advancement of Science, 98% say they believe humans evolved over time.
In court it has repeated failed for
In Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District (2005)
District Judge John E. Jones III ruled that intelligent design is not science but “a religious argument” and “nothing less than the progeny of creationism.”
There is no science to creationism. It is false.
BANGER❤️
And all the animals just willingly complied and single filed, singing Cumbaya! 😂😂🤦🏾♂️
God commanded them in. And the unbelieving pre flood work mocked in unbelief
@@anilkanda611 Oh yea, are you equally concerned about the "flood" that's wiping out the Palestinians right now!? I'm gonna guess not because you're part of the cult that believes "a god" gave white europeans land thousands of miles from their biological homeland! Save your sanctimony!!
Why would a Professor of Law know anything about the Theory of Biological Evolution?
And surely he doesn't.
11:50 Where on earth did he get 90 forms, kinds, of life - and what are they? He mention the wrod 'genus' but it by no means clear what he means.
And where did he get the number '15,000 animals on the Ark' from?
13:10 He think there were TWO pairs of each 'kind'. Where did that come from? Everyone else think there was ONE pair.
14:20 Four postulates fo evolution
1: Life come from non-life
2: All multicellular life-form comes from single celles life forms. Then he states something that is simply not true, that we have no two celled life forms. Besides that, there is no need for wuch a creatiure in evolution, but it does actuallye exist.
3: Time and Chance drive evolution. A very naïve description - or rather downright wrong, as it rules out Natural Selection. His calculation of a single protein 'coming together' is probably correct, but is just irrelevant. We know that functional beneficial n´brand Ne protein coding genes can emrege in the genome of various organisms.
4: Small differences accumulate to major differences. Then he refers to Mendel who didn't show anything like what he suggests. And it is actually not true - new genes DO appear.
When he cannot describe Biological Evolution correctly, and cannot point to relevant problems, there is really not so much more to say.
The rest is just irrelevant!
Why would a RUclips commentator define what is not science?
There is literally no two celled life form that exists. That's a fact.
Okay, then answer those four postulates/questions…with scientific evidence. Bet you can’t. Look…evolution COULD still be an answer, but nobody to this date can actually answer the biggest flaws of it.
@@anilkanda611for the same reason a law professor can
Thank You Jesus !!! My redeemer
To God be the Glory for this revelation!
I reject the ton of evidence for evolution and believe life began by magic. I can't be wrong because I believe myself to be a God. Makes sense to me lol.
Faith is the most dangerous concept ever invented by humans.
Education
Critical thinking
Empathy
The universe creating itself is the biggest magic act you are pushing. Live up to your own standard of logic buddy.
”Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.“
Hebrews 11:1
That’s right!
FAITH: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel.
Good! You read the bible!
@veridicusmaximus6010
WRONG: Incorrect
FAITH: Trust
I hope this helps. Peace and God speed
@@jaredmarcelli2919Sure:
FAITH: Trust without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel.
The Good Lord will bless you abundantly Professor.
This is powerful message.
Yes true!
Yes, and that message is, "Blind faith and denial of facts will keep you ignorant." Blissfully, though, I expect.
Maybe someone could gather all his ignorance and appeals to incredulity and hand-wave evolution away.
I think the professor is being a little dishonest. Any evolutionist biologist would have been bitting at the bit to discuss and or debate any creationist on how we came to be. There are tons of evidence bolstering the scientific theory of evolution. Shame on you
That’s a shame you came to that conclusion. The students who were interviewed were actually there witnessed it. Naturalism is not a solid theory as you were taught to believe.
@@anilkanda611It is the only theory on the topic based on evidence
@@anilkanda611 So the alternative is God did it? Which God? Supernatural explanations have never been proven just debunked each and every time. That is not my opinion that is fact
@@billjohnson9472 Scientific Theory is the proven hypothesis. That is the mechanism that we use to determine what is true in our world. No religion, no Gospel or holy book that was written by man can only make claims that don’t have evidence to support such claims
@@bigwill7097 i meant that evolution is the only theory with evidence supporting it.
This is exactly the stuff that Kent Hovind does and I'm so grateful you've presented this bit as well. Easy to understand and broken down to something reasonable. P.S. I would love to see if you could come to Campbell University here in North Carolina. They used to be a Christian school, but have recently broken off from the Baptist convention and have started becoming a little too "liberal" if you know what I mean.
“This is exactly the stuff that Kent Hovind does…”
What a fitting statement. Yes, they are both willfully ignorant.
@@theatheistcowboy4227 Name specifically what he or Kent Hovind says is scientifically wrong? You're paid to make responses like this.
@@josefniederer5039 I’m paid to make responses to RUclips videos? The fuck are you on about, mate? 🤣
And it’s precisely because I DON’T get paid to comment or teach and have to do other work that I will not be teaching Biology 101 here. If you want a quick one to check “Dr.” Hovind on, try seeing if you can find him defining what a “kind” is and then see how long it takes you to find an animal or plant that doesn’t fit that definition. Or perhaps Dr. Coleman’s take on cats and dogs breeding. If cats and dogs could breed that would actually disprove the theory of evolution as it actually exists. According to the theory of evolution, cats and dogs most definitely should not be able to breed. If you’d like to know more, there are many many sources on both RUclips and educational journals. I am not a science, teacher, or a paid “evolution, promoter“ or whatever the hell you think I am. I am just a man who loves science education and hates scientific misinformation.
@@josefniederer5039 watch the millions of times he's been debunked lmao
name specifically one time he's been debunked. If you're confident in your statement then provide your proof he's been debunked.@@ferociousrazordino3581
This man's explanation is incredibly rock solid! Well done.
I agree.*Don't forget to like and subscribe for more. Thanks friend
It’s not. He says evolution is absolutely false but then also says that dogs on the ark became foxes (which requires evolution to occur). The flood story itself is incredibly unscientific, along with many others in the Bible
rock solid like a marshmallow
“I am quite conscious that my speculations run beyond the bounds of true science. It is a mere rag of an hypothesis with as many flaws and holes as sound parts.” -C. Darwin
Amen
yea because back then it was, it is hillarious that you think we learned nothing in the last almost 200 years
@@daftwulli6145 what's hilarious is that you didn't respond by telling us who has been observed in your family lineage who was not human.
@@refuse2bdcvd324 NIce straw man buddy. You get a gold star on your report card for creating such an utterly disingenious and dishonest argument
That is not how evolution works. WE HAVE directly observed the evolution of new species, and WE HAVE found over 6000 transitional fossils spanning more then 20 transitional species just for human evolution alone. But instead of arguing against the actual evidence and what we are actually saying you first completely misrepresent what we are saying and then argue against that instead
@@refuse2bdcvd324 So on some level you must realize that we are right and that you cannot argue against the facts and arguments we present, or why else would all of you do what you just did ?? Or they outright lie about what science says and then argue against that.
while in 20 years I have never seen a creationist make an genuine argument against what we are really saying . NOT EVEN ONCE
Btw doesn´t lying go against the core values of your religion ?? So not only are you being a hypocrite about evolution, youi are being a hypocrite about yxopur own religion as well.
So cool.
Single to multicellularity has been demonstrated in the lab. The Methusaleh tree is 4,855 years old which predates the traditional date for the flood, but so does Pando which is 80,000 years old.
Sure, a single sperm and a single ova connect to make a single animal, sometimes 2 if there are identical twins.
Parthenogenesis is a myth
@@marionchase-kleeves8311 In what way is parthenogenesis a myth?
4855 years old! That is still a estimate a tree grows according to what the experienced year after year of water fall temperature and nutrients. And data doesn't go back that far especially in its region. What temperature data goes a little over 100 yrs. Until you can cut it down and count rings maybe you could get a closer estimate. Next point when was Adam and Eve created? Some estimates are approximately 9700 yrs ago or 55,000-120,00 or most popular estimate 6000 yrs. So let us say 6,000....... 6000 - 1656 = 4344 yrs! To me that estimate is close enough that it to prove it was after the flood. If a tree grows where there is good soil and rain it will out grow a tree in poor soil and poor rain fall or just in not so friendly conditions. I've seen trees in Reelfoot Lake that over 200 yrs old that are the size of the same tree as one that are approximately 10 yrs. I know of two trees my father planted the same time and one is over 50 ft and the other is 20 ft. They are about 75 yards apart. One is next to a pond and grows slower. Same Cypress trees in Reelfoot lake. Estimates are approximate....... unless you know all the history even stamped dates can mislead.
@@marionchase-kleeves8311 0.8 percent of the women (45 total) reported becoming pregnant without having vaginal sex. so how is it a myth. The oldest recorded mother to date to conceive was 74 years old. who told you it was a myth LOL
theirs three types of dating tho The three methods of dating are: relative dating, radiometric dating, and absolute dating. All methods of measurement - not just radiometric dating - can give wrong results if used incorrectly or inappropriately.
Four tenants of evolution. I am not aware of a single evolutionist who makes those claims. Therefore it is a strawman. Argue against evolution by all means it has its weak points. But please don't use arguments not help it just weekends your position.
Many, many claims, with almost NONE supported by science, while claiming he relies on science.😂
You keep talking without presenting one evidence.
@@anilkanda611 so when I do, you will either accept the evidence or rebut it?
Good luck with that! Everything that follows is falsifiable, repeatable and easily calculated by anyone with basic math skills.
His claim - the water released from the subterranean plates was equal in energy to, and I quote DIRECTLY, " a trillion billion atomic bombs"
The surface of the globe is just over 510,000,000,000,000 square metres. Let's simplify it to 5 x 10 to the 14th.
A trillion billion, divided by this number gives us an answer of 2,000,000.
This means to match Coleman's claim, the energy is that of 2 MILLION atomic bombs on EVERY square metre of the globe. (The more accurate figure is 1.96 MILLION bombs worth of energy per square kilometre)
The Hiroshima bomb, considered small (actually named "Little Boy") was 15 kilotons, or equivalent to 15,000 tons of TNT. Calculating this gives us the equivalent energy of 30 BILLION tons of TNT per square metre of earth surface.
1 cubic metres of TNT weighs approx 1.65 tons
30 billion divided by 1.65 means each metre of the earth would require a stack of TNT 18.1818 MILLION METRES high to produce equivalent energy.
Is that enough evidence to show Coleman is outright lying?
It seems my evidence is too large for you @@anilkanda611. It doesn't seem to have published my calculations?
Bottom line, a trillion billion atomic bombs of energy is equal to the energy from a pile of TNT 18.1818 MILLION metres high on every square metre of the earth's surface.
@@anilkanda611let me summarise incase my calculations don't show up.
510,000,000,000,000 square metres of earth surface into a trillion billion bombs of energy= 2 million bombs of energy per square metre.
1 Hiroshima bomb = 15 kilotons, times 2 million bombs per metre = 30 billion tons of TNT per square metre.
At 1.65 tons of TNT per cubic metre leads to a pile 18 million metres high over the entire earth.
You be the judge!
@@tonyclif1
Your math is visible.
Professor of law? Hmmm...why bother to bring that up since it has absolutely no relevance?
It is. While education and degrees have their place, personal dedication in whatever field you are... can make you an ardent proclaimer of truth.
lawyers are required to present arguments by trade- so they are very qualified...
Yet you offer no rebuttal to anything he said. Wonder why? J.K. I know why, because you have nothing to offer
@@brentkindle6058 The same reason I don't offer anything to rebut some dude claiming he's a woman. How do you refute someone's fantasies? Science is utterly irrelevant to religious faith. If religious people can find some science that seems to support their position, they trot it out. If they find science that does not support their beliefs, they ignore or willfully refuse to grasp it. Religion is ultimately about faith, not logic, evidence, or the scientific method. Those are only fairweather friends for religious persons - to be applauded when they seem to positively support a belief, rejected when they seem to negatively affect their beliefs. Incidentally, I find some aspects of evolutionary theory highly suspect, and I'm an atheist. But my objections are on logical-evidential grounds which for me are absolutely not "fair weather friends."
The part about Noah's flood is one of the major issues I have with the Bible. If the genealogies in Genesis are correct, the flood would have occurred around 2348 BC. However, there were at least 4 major civilizations that existed at that time that were uninterrupted (Norte Chico, Egyptian, Sumerian, and Indus Valley). Also, if it happened at that time, then how did the civilizations get to the Americas? Either the flood was a localized event and was embellished in the Bible, or it didn't happen at all and is just a parable. And, if it was recorded by Moses, which people still aren't sure about, then it would have been recorded more than 1000 years after the flood, which gives the narrative plenty of time to be changed. Many of the books in the Old Testament are sketchy.
It was most likely a localized event written down in some babylonian book, and then story was then "borrowed" by the bible.
Parable??? with all those detailed measurements and specified materials? Even Jesus’ parables didn’t go to those lengths. If it were a myth Jesus was mistaken to refer to the days of Noah.
The Bible says it is foolishness to those who are perishing, much like the people of Noah's time. "Fool, building a boat on dry land."
The world flood is totally a myth.
Everything else is sketchy, the Bible is the truth.
No he didn't. He'd be the most famous person on earth if he disproved evolution to be false.
I pray our Lord Jesus Christ Blesses everyone 🙏 ❤️
Next week: we ask a geologist on the best samba techniques, followed by a trip to the dentist where I will be operated on by a mechanic.
Followed by a RUclips commentator who determines what is and what is not science
@@anilkanda611 I have a BSc in Biology.
@@RustyWalkerthat doesn’t matter much. I literally have PHDs (biology, geology, history, psychology) on the show and people still say the same.
@@anilkanda611 Just goes to show that religion makes people who should know better lie then, doesn't it?
Because this guy presented some of the worst out of date arguments.
Evolution is a proven fact, and religion has shown in the past that it can absorb new information and adapt.
This is no different.
@@anilkanda611 If you had PhD in biology you wouldn't had this mental diarrhea
Thank you for the opportunity to help us understand more Really Interview. God will reward you. It IS written that, men will hate you for my sake. So do not be too surprised. Do not be surprised that they hate God. And reject HIS Truth. They will all be very sorry. It would be sad but oh well. Their free choice
How do you know God will reward him? You speak for God now?
🥇
Professor of law... 😂😂😂😂😂.... This must be the most pathetic argument from authority ever.
Yet you can't refute him.
*don't forget to like and subscribe for more content. Thanks friend!
@@anilkanda611
You can´t refute the madness of a sick mind.
@@Mavors1099 Bingo!
This looks like a skit right out of the Onion.
Holy shit
Debate Aaron Ra, Professor Dave, Forrest Valkai, Gutsick Gibbon for the 20,000
Those people argue that evolution is true because the God of the Bible isn’t true. That does not logically follow. Notice how they cannot argue for evolution without also contrasting it against Creationism. Take Creationism away and their arguments for evolution evaporate.
Why debate with people who are open atheists, claiming to be an atheist is claiming to know that there is absolutely no God. That is the most unintelligent claim ever, why argue with fools? To say there is no God is admitting yourself a fool. It takes more faith to be an atheist, what a weird religion.
Why debate with people who are open atheists, claiming to be an atheist is claiming to know that there is absolutely no God. That is the most unintelligent claim ever, why argue with fools? To say there is no God is admitting yourself a fool. It takes more faith to be an atheist, what a weird religion.
@@davemorrill2490 it’s always fascinated me the way you theists are so smug and condescending towards atheists as if not believing in magic and fairy tales is unreasonable.
@@notnero5280you believe nothing created everything and that order came out of absolute chaos.
Still waiting for my laundry to fold itself in the dryer...
Yeah that's not gonna happen just like a book doesn't write itself.
Sad. The blind leading the blind. People in other countries laugh at Americans for our ignorance.
Ignorance? Christianity went into the foundation of this nation and inspired over 100 different constitutions used all over the world.
@@Mario_Sky_521 Go take a course in biology if you want to know how diversity flourished. As for the origin of life, nobody knows how life on earth got started--whether it's a common event in the universe or extraordinarily rare. But saying "God did it" is not an answer! It's simply a disguised way of saying you don't know.
@@anilkanda611 The U.S. constitution does not make a single mention of God, Jesus, the Bible, or Christianity. Not one single mention! We are not a "Christian Nation." We are a nation in which the majority of citizens are Christian. That's a very different thing. Our constitution is not "inspired by Christianity." In fact, it specifically says that government and religion are to be kept separate! And btw, if you're thinking of pointing to the alleged Christianity of the Founding Fathers, are you aware that Jefferson literally cut up his copy of the Bible and threw away all the parts he thought were ridiculous?
Funny how you thought I said christian nation. I never said such. However, christian principles of liberty and unalienable rights went into the crafting of the document. It was protestants and deists, and others who crafted the document. It was christians who came to this country to escape the Church of England. @@cufflink44
@@anilkanda611 "christian principles of liberty and unalienable rights" Yup, just like in Ephesians 6:5: "Slaves, obey your earthly masters with respect and fear, and with sincerity of heart, just as you would obey Christ." What a brave call for liberty! 😂 Also, you seem to think that Deists are Christians. They're not!
I looked him up and he has not a single science degree i could find , this is a blurb about his position in 2022-2023 i think "Coleman, who will teach Wills and Trust, most recently taught at the New Paltz State University of New York. Coleman has nearly a dozen publications on various research topics, including American politics, public law, political economy, religion and politics and Black politics. Coleman earned his JD from the University of Maryland at Baltimore, a PhD at the University of Chicago, and most recently, he finished his J.S.D. at Emory Law School. VERY IMPRESSIVE....BUT NOT A SINGLE BIT OF SCIENCE SEEMS TO BE INVOLVED IN HIS LIFE!!!!!
I cannot believe that no credible evolutionist is terrified to debate this man . The problem with God is who created “ God”. Respect
His science qualification is the Bible and his relationship with God. You must remember they claim God is the God of science. So in his world he is more than qualified as a scientist
You reject the concept of God, then say your strawman proves there is a problem. God is by definition uncreated. No problem there.
@@ntsokolomemani3874 your post is pretty nonsensical
YOU'RE just showing the innate intelligence of this bonafide Israelite with your commentary.
I may agree with you on the evolution theory, however, for you to say tge earth & the universe is about 6000 yrs is sadly absurd.
We don’t know how old the earth is. Seems to be around when God began creation 6000 years here on this planet. Universe? Scriptures don’t state.
God's time is not the same as ours.
This Professor is amazing
Why?
Because he can convince all these people to give them their money…
So you lot mean to tell me before God so loved the world to the extent that he would give his only son to be violently assaulted and murdered to shed his blood, he actually committed a genocide on a global scale with a big big flood????
Now as a good Christian who is extolled (in Matthew 5:48 ) to be perfect like God, would you kill all your children who have become wayward in order to give yourself a new start?? Please dont answer to me.
It's just food for thought for yourself.
As a human with far less intellect and compassion than God, wouldn't the destruction of your children be the last thing on your mind as a solution, especially if you have the power to change/reform them just by the power of your own pronouncements?
Now check this. The bible says, God REGRETTED for creating humans and decided to commit such an act as a solution to pervasive sin. And then after this act also he regretted again??? and the promised to never do so again using a rainbow as a sign of covenant?
God killed everyone in a flood with the objective of dealing with pervasive sinfulness. Did it work?
He burnt Sodom and Gomorrah too it never worked,
He ordered the Amelikites to be assaulted women and children killed, that too never worked,
He again resorted to the violent murder of his own child, and still! today there is pervasive sin.
for ascribing such spectacular failure to God how long before you realized that all this could only be borrowed myth? How long? How fucking long?
How low is your IQ?
This man did not “debunk” evolution, he doesn’t understand it, per the usual. Creationists never do, unfortunately.
Lol please tell me you actually watched the video. He literally points out several points to why there is a creator and creation. What's your stupid argument?
Rather, you don't understand why it doesn't work.
What is your evidence.
The funny part about every evolutionary model is that someone has to set it up and determine meaningful results. You can’t even separate the models from intelligent designing.
And YOU do? How about YOU providing evidence for this fairy tale for adults. We’ll wait for your response…
Major is a powerhouse, indeed.
Any person who claims that he can debunk the science of evolution without doing any science, indeed, by preaching some religious philosophy in churches, is literally proving that he doesn't even understand basic logic.
So much for this so-called "expert in logic." It's literally just another example of the silly, vacuous word games that creationists love to use in their religion-driven science-denialism.
It amazes me how the negation community in the comments believe they’re smarter than him by just being condescending
I can guarantee they’ll lose any debate against him.
Exactly.
Here is one question for you. Do you like cats? Cats can't swim right? So how did they spread (along with any other non swimming animals) around the world after the flood? America's and Australia have no connection with Eurasia. Also why Kangaroos live only in Australia why so many inhabited island is full of fauna?
Try to answer it yourself.
He even tried offering 20k to the challengers who would prove him wrong ,,,,,he is so confident in God
@@kingumwami1434You cannot be "proven" wrong if your position doesn't stand on racional arguments. How can you argue with someone who dismisses almost all of modern science and it's physical evidence?
The catch phrase to this video is misleading “…debunks evolution”, there is nothing in the videoclip that debunks evolution. Coleman at the start says there are three ways of deriving the truth - logic, science and vision. Unfortunately, logic can also lead to false conclusion. Take for example the simple logic construction A=B, B=C, therefore A must equal C. All animals have 4 legs, a table has 4 legs, therefore a table is an animal. A logically sound construct that led to a false conclusion. Just look at the many so called visions from famous “seers” and see how many of these came true, the statistic is not significant. Science with all its own challenges still remains one of humans most reliable method at deriving a probable truth within a confidence level. Science is not reliant on old documents (many of which are questionable including the Bible), what a person says is the truth, dogma, race, tribe, customs or traditions but involves rigour and a truth that can be independently confirmed or proven wrong by different people across the globe. Let’s look an other arguments put forward by Coleman for the truism of the Noah Ark story. Biblical scholars trace the origin of this story to Mesopotamia, in a genre of myth. The numbers cited in this Noah story, 120, 40 days and night, 300, 50, 3 levels, 6 (3 sons 3 wives = 33), 600 years, 8 people, etc, can be found in different cosmological derived stories of various cultures across the globe. I have written a book called Akashic Records and the Holy Grail, in this book I dedicate a chapter entitled “Divine Numbers” that discusses the persistency and meaning of various numbers found in various societies and the meaning thereof. It is said that it took Noah and family (8 in total (1 Peter 3:20) another mythological number also rendered as the infinity sign), 55 to 75 years to build the Ark, it is most likely the number 72 that it is related to Pythagoras’ famous theorem of a right angle triangle. The sins for which this god wanted to destroy the earth and all living creatures are because sons of god saw human females as fair and took them as wives and because of violence on earth. What does poor creatures have to do with human love/sex matters and human violence and have to suffer collective punishment. There is no genetic proof that all humans came from the Noah and his family family-tree. Coleman also does not understand animal diversity as linked to their habitat and thus geographic spread. For example the polar bear is found at the North Pole regions, the Panda in China, so Noah in the Middle East must have had an Alien spacecraft to travel the world to collect the different species? What amazes me most is the blatant illogical nonsense which you often found in so called religious texts, let’s look at the Bible, you have a god the is all might, can perform miracles, yet he needs weak people to carry out his will. If he is as might as is claimed, all he needed to do is gather all the animals he wanted to save at a specific place and destroyed the rest, why would he need an old man like Noah. Why is the miracles he performs so insignificant to the majority challenges facing nature and humans - what significance is the changing of water into wine when you had applauding slavery, and the then incurable diseases like leprosay (colonies of these people existed, it took science to cure this disease), endless wars and other ills of humans. I always laugh at the nonsense of Allah prohibiting the drinking of wine or alcohol and then you fined some Muslims taking drugs, and when you confront them their reply is that Allah only forbids alcohol not drugs! Of what value is the levitation of Buddhas monks!
No.
A foolish response!
@@rachmondhoward2125 tell us more how sheer chance created the universe
Anil. I do not purport to know how our universe and material life came into existence. The chance theory versus creationist theory of the universe have a long history of debate. The chance theory is supported by some scientific observations whereas the creationist theory which is given as fact is only supported by religious dogma - because some religious texts says so therefore it is so. Different so called religious texts from different societies have their own versions of the creationist “theory” or shall we say creation myth. For example in the Bible, we have an old male deity (Jewish god) speaking the universe and life into being. The Hindus believe that everything always existed in a constant flux resulting in ever changing of one thing into another - the Wheel of Samsara. All effort must be made by humans to escape this endless cycle of reincarnation by becoming enlightened beings. In the ancient Egyptian belief system, Path , a ram-headed god created humans from clay on a spinning wheel. In other creation myth, a god sacrificed himself and out of this the entire universe was created. So which one of these stories is true and why chose one when all of them are based on dogma. Let’s turn to science and see what we know about the universe. The universe is about 14 billion years old with some new evidence suggesting it might be even more older. Life about 1 to 2 billion years, human species (the most destructive beings on planet earth who have created nuclear capabilities that can wipeout itself and all living things) about 1 to 2 million years old. Only about 5 percent of the universe is made of matter, about 95 of unknown (dark something and dark energy). Most of our scientific endeavours have been focused on understanding matter related issues but in roads are being made to understand the 95 percent. Quantum theory is assisting us to gain new insights into this “unknown” phenomenon. Let’s turn to living things and see what science has discovered. The elements that forms the building blocks of life was formed billions of years ago in the so called Big Bang theory. We have a fairly good understanding of all of these elements, identified in what we call the Periodic Table. Our fossil records show that the first life forms were simple single cell organisms and these evolved to form multicellular organisms. No religious text says anything about this but the Hindu text might hint at this saying that inorganic matter can transform into life. Inorganic matter can spontaneously associate to form complex structures, look at a snow flake or crystals as examples but what is still a massive unsolved problem is the question of what constitutes “life” and how and why would inorganic matter became “alive”. From a physics point of view, elements want to be at the lowest energy level, complexity demands higher energy levels and is thus unstable. There are still no definitive answers to these questions. We know that all life forms are made of nucleic acids (RNA and DNA). The famous Miller Experiment showed that under the right physical conditions simple inorganic elements can spontaneously associate to form simple chain macromolecules, strings of RNA and peptides. You did not need a deity to create these. It has also been discovered that celestial bodies like comets carry simple nucleic chains and so there is some suggestions that life may have arisen from these macromolecules. So what we call chance is far more complex than what the average Joe Blocks understand, yet, he is always the one who passionately argue, not based on facts but emotions, that the six-day creation story is true!
Anil. I do not purport to know how our universe and material life came into existence. The chance theory versus creationist theory of the universe have a long history of debate. The chance theory is supported by some scientific observations whereas the creationist theory which is given as fact is only supported by religious dogma - because some religious texts says so therefore it is so. Different so called religious texts from different societies have their own versions of the creationist “theory” or shall we say creation myth. For example in the Bible, we have an old male deity (Jewish god) speaking the universe and life into being. The Hindus believe that everything always existed in a constant flux resulting in ever changing of one thing into another - the Wheel of Samsara. All effort must be made by humans to escape this endless cycle of reincarnation by becoming enlightened beings. In the ancient Egyptian belief system, Path , a ram-headed god created humans from clay on a spinning wheel. In other creation myth, a god sacrificed himself and out of this the entire universe was created. So which one of these stories is true and why chose one when all of them are based on dogma. Let’s turn to science and see what we know about the universe. The universe is about 14 billion years old with some new evidence suggesting it might be even more older. Life about 1 to 2 billion years, human species (the most destructive beings on planet earth who have created nuclear capabilities that can wipeout itself and all living things) about 1 to 2 million years old. Only about 5 percent of the universe is made of matter, about 95 of unknown (dark something and dark energy). Most of our scientific endeavours have been focused on understanding matter related issues but in roads are being made to understand the 95 percent. Quantum theory is assisting us to gain new insights into this “unknown” phenomenon. Let’s turn to living things and see what science has discovered. The elements that forms the building blocks of life was formed billions of years ago in the so called Big Bang theory. We have a fairly good understanding of all of these elements, identified in what we call the Periodic Table. Our fossil records show that the first life forms were simple single cell organisms and these evolved to form multicellular organisms. No religious text says anything about this but the Hindu text might hint at this saying that inorganic matter can transform into life. Inorganic matter can spontaneously associate to form complex structures, look at a snow flake or crystals as examples but what is still a massive unsolved problem is the question of what constitutes “life” and how and why would inorganic matter became “alive”. From a physics point of view, elements want to be at the lowest energy level, complexity demands higher energy levels and is thus unstable. There are still no definitive answers to these questions. We know that all life forms are made of nucleic acids (RNA and DNA). The famous Miller Experiment showed that under the right physical conditions simple inorganic elements can spontaneously associate to form simple chain macromolecules, strings of RNA and peptides. You did not need a deity to create these. It has also been discovered that celestial bodies like comets carry simple nucleic chains and so there is some suggestions that life may have arisen from these macromolecules. So what we call chance is far more complex than what the average Joe Blocks understand, yet, he is always the one who passionately argue, not based on facts but emotions, that the six-day creation story is true!
God Bless this brother and his family!
This man is brilliant
😂😂😂😂
For what shall it profit a man if he shall gain brilliance but employ it to promote ignorance?
This professor is a genius, I hope his students will listen to him. Considering that most professors now think there are more than two genders, this guy is a breath of fresh air.
Yes! Please like and follow
Yea his lies are indeed ingenious, like that evolution would claim doghs and cats should be able to interbreed, when in reality that would disprove evolution. Guess being a lawyer helped him find lies that are easily believabler if you are clueless
The level of ignorance to hold this viewpoint is just astounding. The mountains and mountains for evolution are just so overwhelmingly large that the only way to feasibly deny it is to know nothing about it.
That was the assumption but now more and more scientists are coming forward. There are numerous reasons that you can investigate. As with any objective investigation, start with a clean slate and see what the evidence and arguments tell you.
And its definitely not ignorance. The scientists holding this view were trained in orthodox evolutionary theory but they were able to use objective thought to come to a different understanding. Orthodox evolution is an approach to ensure that there is no place for a Creator in the origins of life. There is, however, overwhelming evidence for an intelligent design of everything and hence the young earth approach.
That's false. There is ZERO evidence for macro evolution.
Micro evolution is NOT the same thing as macro, there is a limit as to how far an organism can change.
A bacteria will always be a bacteria, it will never evolve into something else.
Cats will always be cats, fish will always be fish although there will be many different types of fish, and many different breeds of cats, dog will always be dogs. Apes will always be apes. (And whether you believe it or not we do not share a common ancestor with apes we are a special creation)
The fossil evidence does not prove macro Darwinian evolution is true, it proves that it is false.
If it were true there would be Trillions upon Trillions upon trillions upon Trillions of transitional fossils.
There are ZERO transitional fossils despite what you have been taught.
The DNA evidence does not prove that all life share a common ancestor it proves the opposite. The DNA evidence proves that it would be mathematically impossible for all life to share a common ancestor unless there was a Creator behind it.
People say stupid thing like "we share 96% of our DNA with chimps." First of all that is false. Second people don't realize that that 4% difference is an ASTRONOMICALLY large amount of information in the DNA. So much so that it either did not happen because it would be mathematically impossible to happen by chance. Or an intelligent God was causing it to happen. It could not possibly happen by chance, and in fact it did not happen. The theory that all life shares a common ancestor is simply proven false to anyone who does not have blinders on their eyes.
It's also similar to an archaeologist finding a tractor buried in a certain level of dirt, and then a Toyota Corolla found in another layer of dirt.
So they date the tractor as 100,000 years older than the Toyota and say that the Toyota evolved out of the tractor. And share a common ancestor with the tractor because they both have four wheels, a steering wheel, headlights, ect. The tractor Cher's 95% of its DNA with the Toyota Corolla.
That's how dumb the argument for Macro darwinian evolution is.
What I mean by darwinian macroevolution is that all life supposedly evolved from a common ancestor..
People who believe that macro darwinian evolution is true believe it because they have been brainwashed to believe it.
Ask someone to prove it to you and they can't. BECAUSE it's simply not true. You are simply going with the crowd.
Non life becoming life somehow with “time” is highly improbable. Looking up “the information sequence problem to the origin of replication” shows why this is.
He says time works against evolution (15:05), How is that? , yet previously, he said that you needed one type of dog to create different species of dog like coyote, wolves, dingo etc etc (13:00) that sounds and looks like evolution to me. He also claims the planet, solar system, universe is thousands of years old, but that time frame is not long enough to observe evolutionary changes although on that time frame evolution is still in progress. Evolution works on the billions of years time frame to SEE GREAT CHANGES IN ANY SPECIES. Beside we humans don't leave long enough to see these evolutionary changes. Everything is still evolving as we speak..... he claims the flood happened 2500 BC then the question is when was the ancient Egyptian civilization started? 3100 BC...yet we know after the ancient Egyptian empire came the ancient Greeks 1600 BC, then the Romans 753 BC, then the Byzantium empire 330. The histories are the evidence. At 23:00 he was asked if any other humans or animals could have survived the flood, he responded, '' absolutely not''' meaning nothing survived but at 29:40 when ask about insects on the ark he states that insects are hardy just like giants of the sea that were not on the ark but though many died some survived. But earlier nothing outside the ark survived. SMH....Your argument is porous, incongruent, slightly piggy backs on science and frankly misguided. keep trying creationists, you will find it increasingly difficult to defend that point of view as science provides more evidence with the passage of time...and you will still be stuck with the same old story of creation that has not moved one millimetre. I had a good laugh though.
Keep asking questions. You have much to learn. This earth is not evolving- it follows the second law of thermodynamics. The changing distance between the earth and the sun should be one very simple truth to demonstrate that the earth is not Billions oy years old (evolution is based on uniformitarianism).ruclips.net/video/rXexaVsvhCM/видео.html
He can't deny evolution itself because there are strong evidence for it (evolution of bacteria last few weeks, you don't have to wait millennia). What he says is he doesn't believe in evolution of one species into others. Dogs evolution from wolf to puddles lasted few tousends of years and it's scientific fact nobody denies. It was possible because it wasn't evolution triggered by natural selection. I'm not creationist but your argument with dogs is too weak. Better argument would be how did Kangaroos get to Australia and why there are no Kangaroos anywhere else if they departed Noe's ark in middle east?
oh yes! the guillible audience could not realise that! Thank you!
Thank you! At las not all of the readers here are guillible.
But let even look at the morality of the story since morals matter to them
Before God so loved the world to the extent that he would give his only son to be violently assaulted and murdered to shed his blood, (John 3.16) he actually committed a genocide on a global scale with a big big flood????
so as Christians are extolled (in Matthew 5:48 ) to be perfect like God, would they emulate God and kill all their wayward children in order to give yourself a new start??
As humans with far less intellect and compassion than their God, if they had the power to change/reform their children just by the power of their own pronouncements
wouldn't the killing of their children be the last thing on their mind as a solution?
Now check this. The bible says, God REGRETTED for creating humans and decided to commit such an act as a solution to pervasive sin.
And then what happened afterwards? He regretted again??? hahaha And then promptly promised to never do so again using a rainbow as a sign of covenant?
SUMMARY
God killed everyone in a flood with the objective of dealing with pervasive sinfulness. IT DIDNT WORK
He burnt down Sodom and Gomorrah too with the objective of dealing with pervasive sinfulness. IT DIDNT WORK
He ordered the Amelikites to be assaulted (women and children killed), with the objective of dealing with their pervasive sinfulness. iT DIDNT WORK
He again resorted to the violent murder of his own child with the objective of dealing with pervasive sinfulness. IT DIDNT WORK
TODAY TODAY TODAY THERE IS PERVASIVE SINFULNESS
Now, for ascribing such spectacular failures to "God" supposedly a an all knowing being, how long before you all realized that all this could only be borrowed mythology?
How fucking long?
I believe there is a Creator of the Universe, but certainly not the one in the bible and quran doing some quixotic stuff including entering a bet with Satan to destroy Job to show Satan that he is the boss.
building blocks for life is very fragile, it won't wait millions of years keep shuffleling until become functional, it will decompose.
how it was gradualy formed while it's gradually decomposed?
Does he really argue that the proof for his "young" earth is how old the oldest trees are? OMG.
Learn the difference between oldest tree and clonial trees.
@@anilkanda611 "Clonial" isn't a word
stop condescending. State ur counter point. Don't just signal idiocy
@@yodaheabebe3756 ["stop condescending. State ur counter point. Don't just signal idiocy"] My counter-point here is crystal clear. I'll try to dumb in down for you. Trying to argue the age of the earth is determined by the age of a tree is complete idiocy. Do you really need an explanation why? Apparently you do. Trees, like other living things, are reproducing. The grow from seedlings, create more seedlings, and ultimately die. The fact that a tree is living in no way implies the age of the earth, any more than looking at the oldest living person would indicate the age of the earth. Good lord.
@iriemon1796 No you're being dum on purpose here. He clearly spoke about multiple lines of evidence here to support his claim of young earth. He just brought up the oldest tree to show that we don't find anything older than that to show for absolute certainity that it lived longer. you're making look as if that's ALL he said, he's just adding that to support his other claims.
I am always surprised by the number of people who are thirsty to listen to a storyteller even though everything he says is lies. Creationism is a story, not history.
ICR proposes, Noah took livestock on board since clean animals were 7 pairs not 2, Animals were younger, or they hibernated. All possible since the Lord led them on the Ark.
@@anilkanda611 No one in their right mind can believe that two kangaroos left Australia to reach the Middle East and return to Australia to repopulate the entire continent. It is a tribal story for a primitive tribe with a primitive worldview. It cannot be taken literally
@@anilkanda611
If you invoke magic then why even go with the Ark?! Just use magic to make all the evil people go away!
I used to consider the people from WEST to be critical thinkers but I am slowly losing confidence in my consideration.
Shun your prejudice remarks and challenge his ideas instead.
@@anilkanda611 yeah sure.
Here is an article about the age of the earth,
Patterson, C., paper at a Conference on Application of Nuclear Processes to Geological Problems at Geneva, Wis., Sept. (1953).
If the Major has some data published in any peer reviewed paper please provide the link for his paper. I will be happy to read the paper about his conclusions on the age of the Earth.
@@anilkanda611 "ideas"...🤣
@@HernanToroA Because you were there at the beginning. Right, spare me your sanctimony😆
Thanks for the dialogue. I do not hold to his ideas of the age of the earth. I frankly don't know and or desire to but the age of life, I have contention. For example, the amount of living tissue specimens that been recently discovered present challenges to traditionally thought models of long spans for evolutionary model to work.
"Soft-tissue preservation in terrestrial Mesozoic vertebrates -Mary H. Schweitzer et al.
"Molecular preservation in Late Cretaceous sauropod dinosaur eggshells- Jasmina Wiemann et al.
"The record of microbially mediated redox reactions spanning 2,000 meters of sediment" -Gordon D. Love et al.
@@Dannydreadlord
Yes! God never asks for a blind faith.
If you’re referring to the Christian God, he exclusively asks for blind faith. If the Bible is to be believed, that is.
@@theatheistcowboy4227biblical faith is 'sure of what we hope for and certain of what we see'. No blind faith
@@allenminter4728 “Blessed are those who have not seen and yet believe” - Jesus, supposedly
@@theatheistcowboy4227
Context on this one matters.
None of us have physically seen Jesus. That would mean every living Christian is doing it wrong. Or,... Or maybe you just need a little more understanding.
He was talking to Thomas about his doubts. Thomas was the only one who had not seen him alive after his crucifixion. It's not a call to blind faith...
@@theatheistcowboy4227and you weren't there at the big bang nor have you seen any forms of macro evolution?
who needs silly things like evidence and logic when you can just explain it all away with faith and magic?
Tell us more how aliens created the universe.
@@anilkanda611 never said aliens did, but enjoy thinking a silly old fanfic holds the answers.
Like faith everything came from nothing by magic?
@@stevenwhite8937 bb model doesn't explain where matter came from, you'd know that if you looked into it.
@@DistinctiveBlendbetter yet explain how life came from non-life, without faith or magic.
Revelation is evidence only to the person it’s revealed to. To all others it’s hearsay
The Ark replica in Kentucky is worth noting and it is actually to scale.
The one that doesn't float and took hundreds of guys with power tools years to build?
@@torreyintahoe You wouldn't scoff if you saw it in person. It is beautiful. And if you have interest in Bible stories its clarifying.
@@christinebridges4212 I'm sure it's impressive from a carpentry point of view. The problem is that it reinforces the false world view of fundamentalist creationists like Ken Ham. There was no flood. That is beyond a proven fact. The flood has been disproven using every discipline of science. Evolution is settled science. There is no scientific argument against it. The world is not thousands of years old it's billions. Dinosaurs did not live alongside humans. These are all objective realities about the world that Ken Ham is in denial about.
2 Peter 3
In the last days scoffers will come denying the global flood.
Matthew 24
In the last days lawlessness will increase and the hearts of many will grow cold.
@@wingandprayer8 2000 years of any day now.