Hi king and generals could you please make a video about the qramita senescence there topic is unknown for many people and I think that their topic is one of the most surprising topics in history.
I feel sorry for Ali, he seemed like an upright honourable man who tried to do the right thing while holding on to power. If Ali had been more ruthless and underhanded like Muawiya, he perhaps would have won the Fitna.
He was fighting for his principles, not for the throne! That is why following his principles were more important than some battle victories for Ali, the honorable rashidun Imam Caliph
You are right, my friend. I would recommend you look deeper into the history of Ali. During the Prophet’s lifetime he was the champion of Islam, their greatest warrior who was decisive in countless battles. But he was always a man of principle and morals first, never a conqueror. He sought peace even when it meant he did not achieve total victory. This life was but a passing thing for him.
It really makes you wonder how many honorable men who have died because they didn't want to be overly cruel. In war you have to ruthless. Willing to do more and endure more and do so faster, more efficient and for longer. Anything less and someone decides they can do your job better than you.
@@geordiejones5618 True but some men would rather die for their principles than live selfishly and cruelly. In the end they’re all going to die, and now history remembers Ali far better than it remembers someone like Muawiyah.
As a Muslim who's been taught about all of these early Islamic conflicts, I appreciate this video alot and have learned a Thing or two from it. Thanks again
Same, as an agnostic Westerner it annoys me to no end how little emphasis public schools place on World History, we get it Europe had a "Dark Age" but Islam was literally experiencing their golden age at the exact same time! Also China was chugging along as usual being the most important exporter on the planet for luxuries, followed closely by India & SE Asia
@@محمديونس-7 he got the information for the same sources u might have came across, everyone has their own say on many different sources that I’ve read but don’t know what to believe
It's really interesting once you take the Islamic aspect of this out of the picture and focus on the political and military aspect of the times. The Islamic faith might as well have originated on another planet, I am no way implying it's not as valid as the other major faiths but it's far more complex and would make Game of Thrones writers blush. I have studied it and still don't understand all of it's quirks and factions. However I am good at understanding politics. These Muslim Expansion videos give much needed context to the struggle we face today in the modern middle east.
@@JRGProjects tbf having to understand the religious splits and minor doctrinal differences and divergences of Christian and Buddhist denominations is probably equally as esoteric/opaque as would be any sufficiently widespread religion, Islam just has the benefit of being relatively young and decently centralized for much of its early formation
@@Laakien agreed. The time we are experiencing is what Christianity and even Judaism experienced long ago. The 30 Years War Protestants vs Catholics or the Jewish Faith's back and forth wars in Israel in the Old Testament. Islam is in it's growing pain period but eventually like the others I believe they will grow out of it.
@@JRGProjects its actually extremely simple from my experience as a muslim, i am assuming the complexities are abt islamic sects. But i mean there r only 2, shia’s and sunni’s everything else is related to one of them.
Ali ibn Abi Talib was special. It is said that one who can wield a sword in the battle and can fight courageously cannot be good with qalam(🖋️ pen) and is cold hearted. One who is a philosopher or good with writing cannot be good at fighting as they are soft hearted. But Ali was a fierce and unmatched warrior in the battle field yet being extremely soft hearted, kind and forgiving alongside. Being the best in all areas of human endeavour.
Ali was obviusly unfit for rule. He couldn't even control his own men yet, how was he going to control the entire caliphate. He also recruited the murderers of the third rightly guided caliph, Osman, into his army, which was already the main reason for the problem between him and Muawiya. Againist to the demands of Muawiyah, he always avoided punishing them. He was a wonderful warrior but not a good politician.
@@sourweed9818 Keep spamming this comment. The truth is Ali was a greater warrior and a greater ruler than any of the other ‘Caliphs’. It was jealously and hatred for him that led to the instability and war during his reign.
@@mclovinjr9086 i am spreading the truth. He protected the murderers, and his death came at the hands of the murderers he protected. If he had gotten rid of them in the first place and showed his authority, neither Muawiya nor anyone else would have dare to anything againist him.
@@sourweed9818 You’re a liar. Answer me clearly, are you calling Ali unjust? Are you saying Ali prevented justice by protecting murderers? Because if you say this, you against the words of the Prophet PBUH.
@@mclovinjr9086 yes. And i am not saying anything to againist Prophet. Weak hadithes cannot be taken into account. There is nothing in Quran about Ali. Ali was Just a human like anybody else. Only Prophets are infallible not their sons in law.
Ali was obviusly unfit for rule. He couldn't even control his own men yet, how was he going to control the entire caliphate. He also recruited the murderers of the third rightly guided caliph, Othman, into his army, which was already the main reason for the problem between him and Muawiya. Againist to the demands of Muawiyah, he always avoided punishing them. Eventually His death came from them. He was a wonderful warrior but not a good politician.
@@mclovinjr9086 I can not hate someone who married with Prophet's daughter. Cut that shia bias. I love Ali as much as i love Uthman. And yes Uthman made a lot of mistakes too. But Uthman was the leader of the Ummah which Ali pledged allegiance too. Those who murdered him should have been prosecuted rather than protected. And you know that very well too. What can be expected from a rafidi who sees Omar's zoroastrian murderer, which Ali pledged allegiance too, as a hero
@@sourweed9818 he could control his men easily. He refused to use the same vile tactics that Muawayiah would liberally use. Muawayiah didn’t care much for Uthman killers as he didn’t pursue them or really supported uthman during his reign. Also, who was the murderer who was in Ali army
The Prophet (ﷺ) passed by `Ammar and removed the dust off his head and said, "May Allah be merciful to `Ammar. He will be killed by a rebellious group. `Ammar will invite them to (obey) Allah and they will invite him to the (Hell) fire." Sahih al-Bukhari 2812.
During the Battle of Siffin, Caliph Ali challenged Muawiah for a one on one battle; so that all the conflict be resolved once and for all with minimum bloodshed. Hearing this, the conqueror of Egypt, Amr ibn Al A'as told muawiah that he is left with no other choice but to accept this. Ali has made a fair offer! Muawiah responded, "Ali has killed each and every person he ever faced in battle! How can a one on one duel against him be a fair offer?" Reference: After the Prophet by Leslie Hazleton
@@williamrobert9898 'Ali, Khalid ibn Walid, and 'Umar ibn Khattab was among the most feared and renowned champions of the Muslim world back then. However, unlike most of them, 'Ali was not only a strongman, but also a scholar. He's a genius bruiser.
@@williamrobert9898 Ali was the banner carrier in at least a dozen different battles in his late teens and 20's. He was the right hand of Muhammad ﷺ during the establishment of Islam, defeating the most feared champions and breaking through staunch forts. In the battles shown in this video Ali was in his late 50's but was still a warrior to be reckoned with.
I feel like the mention that a sizeable portion of Ali's army (In both Siffin and the battle of the camel shown in the previous video) were the rebels (Who would eventually become the Kharijites) who had originally taken up arms against Uthman and eventually had him killed is needed. Another point being that the three men who carried out the assassination attempts, were part of the Kharijite movement (The assassin of Ali having being a part of the Kharijite army who fought Ali at Nahrawan) and they viewed the 3 men (Ali, Muawyia and Amr) has heretics deserving to be killed. Also a small sidenote, Ali's son Al Hassan did assume the title of caliph for a short of time (and is considered to be the fifth rashidun caliph by some sources), but then ceded it to Muwayia, according to most Islamic sources to prevent further bloodshed in the Islamic world. Nonetheless another great video, keep up the awesome work!
@@ChevyChase301 nope, the persians were essentially fully subsumed into the islamic world and the only rebel remnants were taking refuge in china. Those remenants later were defeated by the ummayyads. The romans had their own problems and probably couldn't do much even if they had wanted to.
It's propaganda because those who protested against Uthman R.A were mostly companions . It's a propaganda from some factions of the Ahlus Sunnah but many accept this reality. It was due to the corrupt governors that most people protested against the government.
sahih bukhari 2812 Narrated `Ikrima: that Ibn `Abbas told him and `Ali bin `Abdullah to go to Abu Sa`id and listen to some of his narrations; So they both went (and saw) Abu Sa`id and his brother irrigating a garden belonging to them. When he saw them, he came up to them and sat down with his legs drawn up and wrapped in his garment and said, (During the construction of the mosque of the Prophet) we carried the adobe of the mosque, one brick at a time while `Ammar used to carry two at a time. The Prophet passed by `Ammar and removed the dust off his head and said, May Allah be merciful to `Ammar. He will be killed by a rebellious aggressive group. `Ammar will invite them to (obey) Allah and they will invite him to the (Hell) fire.
@@Lzali10469 guys stop the fitna for the love of allah both of them are great sahabi’s who are we to make opinions on who’s better? Stop this for the sake of allah .
It’s more complicated than people think. Ali didn’t agree with the entirety of the caliphs but accepted peace as long as it prevented bloodshed. The conspiracy of killing Othman was large and the enemies of Ali were involved. When Othman was killed it was the same people who had a hand in his death who blaimed Ali. Later the people asked Ali to be caliph and he refused to take the position if they consider him just another “fourth” caliph. But when Ali saw things going south he finally agreed to take leadership.
This is the best history channel ever, King and General on my top watchlist coz introduce with history of world including Muslim world and Christian World.
@@sigitprabowo363 check out Farid responds on this topic and Yasir Qadhi also has a good lecture too. The problem is much of this video is from Shia sources but the problem with Shia sources is no one knows who relates them unlike Sunni sources where all biographies of the people are written down too
Ali (as) personally selected Malik al-Ashtar and Abdullah ibn Abbas (his first cousin) from his army for arbitration. But many people from the army of Ali rejected his choice and selected Abu Musa al-Ashari as their choice. On which Ali was really disappointed as no one didn't follow his order.
@@hussamuddin2361 dukaan aapki chalti hogi. Allah ke sabse zyada mehboob Maula Ali (as) hain. Unse ishq aur muhabbat emaan ka hissa hai. Pta nahi konsi dukaan ki baat kar rhe ho tum
He recruited the murderers of the third rightly guided caliph, Uthman, into his army, which was already the main reason for the problem between him and Muawiya. Againist to the requests of Muawiyah, he always avoided punishing them. Eventually His death came from them. He was a wonderful warrior but not a good politician.
@@sourweed9818 Ali a.s was not unfit for rule. Usman introduced nepotism in his caliphate by bringing Marwan ibn Hakam into Medina who was exiled by the Holy Prophet. Ali was the one for whom the Prophet said "Ali is with the truth and the truth is with Ali". "Ali and I are the fathers of this nations"
@@murtazaraza7605 Prophet did not say that. That hadith is a weak narration and it is most likely a fabrication. There is nothing in Quran explicity about Ali. If God had a such an intention about him, he surely explicitly would reveal it.
Another prophecy of the Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him came true when he predicted that after him would rule the 'Caliphate of Prophecy' for thirty years. 2 of Abu Bakr, 10 of Umar, 12 of Uthman, 5.5 of Ali and Al Hassan ibn Ali ruled for 6 months before ceding his rule to Muawiyah (May Allah be pleased with them all). Also Al Hassan was prophesied by the Prophet to be a leader who would bring peace to two large dissenting groups of Muslims which did happen!
Prophecied in what books written by people who killed Ali and hussain i have deeply read the Islamic history and realized that most of the people who were corrupt and killers end up writing their own history for Islam most of it is one sided doesn't really matter if you are shia or sunni
@@Theshowoffcollector do some proper research mate. Yes, some of the army against Husayn consisted of Kufans, but not all of them. Habib ibn Madhahir and a few others from Kufa were on Husayn's side. Everyone else was either killed, jailed. or prevented from leaving
@@Theshowoffcollector sahih bukhari 2812 Narrated `Ikrima: that Ibn `Abbas told him and `Ali bin `Abdullah to go to Abu Sa`id and listen to some of his narrations; So they both went (and saw) Abu Sa`id and his brother irrigating a garden belonging to them. When he saw them, he came up to them and sat down with his legs drawn up and wrapped in his garment and said, (During the construction of the mosque of the Prophet) we carried the adobe of the mosque, one brick at a time while `Ammar used to carry two at a time. The Prophet passed by `Ammar and removed the dust off his head and said, May Allah be merciful to `Ammar. He will be killed by a rebellious aggressive group. `Ammar will invite them to (obey) Allah and they will invite him to the (Hell) fire.
Ali was obviusly unfit for rule. He couldn't even control his own men yet, how was he going to control the entire caliphate. He also recruited the murderers of the third rightly guided caliph, Osman, into his army, which was already the main reason for the problem between him and Muawiya. Againist to the demands of Muawiyah, he always avoided punishing them. Eventually His death came from them. He was a wonderful warrior but not a good politician.
@@sourweed9818 where you physically present at the time to fairly and justly assess the current of events of the time without any biases?! The truth of the matter is, we'll never fully know the nuances and details that affected each men to do what they did in that time of their lives. So calling one men or another unfit/wrong on the sole basis of hearsay is simply unrighteous and unwise. Only ALLAH swt knows the true motivators of men back then AND now, AND forever. Also I've seen this comment copy pasted all over the place, what is your goal?! Maybe you're spreading truth; However it's from YOUR pov. It just incites more argument and division, rushed and unwise. What our Ummah needs is Unity, not Division. And what better words to inspire unity of our Ummah than ones lying within the noble Quran, absolute truth from the all knowing. May peace be unto you brother in faith, and may the seekers of truth and peace keep on seeking! :)
@@keepitjazzy7349 The sources that claim Imam Ali was on the fronts are the same sources you take as accountable in this series of historical events. Denying this while still accepting other accounts from the same sources whitout any logic1l or historical reason would be irrational . - the sources are abundant if you were to ask , which is called "mutawatir" in arabic , means if these sources are not accountable , nothing then would be accountable - It's is nearly a fact brother . May god bless you with his teachings
I hope everyone who watches this feels the same way. No one is taking any sides here. Without any religious bias or political speculation, only the facts known to history and agreed upon by all parties are present. Peace be upon you all.
@Samtic people are the best. he may have contributed to it but he is not the only one who brought Islam to where it is today. And Islam is not supposed to be where it is today.
@Samtic people are the best. I am not denying that those things did not happen because of him. I know somewhat about the contribution of the Umayyads into the expansion of Islam. You should read my comment before replying like that. I am just not a big fan Muawiya, how he did not honor his agreement with Hassan.
Truly great take on what objectively happened to cause the rift; not a religious or political slant to it. Everyone was in the wrong, and so it split four great sects of Islam.
Ali was obviusly unfit for rule. He couldn't even control his own men yet, how was he going to control the entire caliphate. He also recruited the murderers of the third rightly guided caliph, Uthman, into his army, which was already the main reason for the problem between him and Muawiya. Againist to the requests of Muawiyah, he always avoided punishing them. Eventually His death came from them. He was a wonderful warrior but not a good politician.
@@sourweed9818 this is your personal opinion and nothing more. The Prophet sawa himself stated that Ali is with haq and haq is with Ali. I would prefer going with what the Prophet said rather than you. Also you said “rightly guided caliph, Uthman”. Interesting, can you show me one instance where the Prophet appointed either Abu bakr, Umar or Uthman (la on all) as the rightful successor after him? Seems like a serious title to give someone without backing it up.
What an amazing video. Historically very accurate and also with least bias. I wish for every muslim to watch this and learn about their history. Hopefully people will see the main source of division that is so apparent in our early history and even stubbornly followed to this day.
@@RocketAfriqueZA There was no Shia back then. Umar was killed by a Persian majoosi, uthman and Ali were killed by muslims. Thousands of muslims were killed by Yazid in makkah. The ones who killed hussein were from Kufa. They sent him letters to invite him there and they betrayed him. The same kufan joined Zaid bin Hussein but abandoned him to his death alone. When you revolt and fight against the government, you pay dearly. Iran is an example, people are killed everyday because they want regime change. It was political reason back then and even now in Iran, so don't try to bring theology into this matter
@@nasserm.nasser5087Brother he didnt mean Shia, he meant the Kufans who were Yemenite tribes migrants to the city of Kufa the capital of Ali which was initially built by Caliph Umar to act as defensible position in case Persians regained strength and tried to attack Arabia, there wil be defensible position on Euphrates in Kufa. Those Kufans who fought under Ali are the same ones who pushed for arbitration with Mua'wiya when Imam Ali advised against it and tehy rejected Imam Ali's select judges such as Abdullah ibn Abbas, in favor of Abu Musa Al Ashaari because of his Yemenite background, Abu Musa didnt like Imam Ali, he helped rule Arbitration in favor of Mu'awiya. Those same Yemenites imbeciles, learned of their grave mistake for losing face against Mu'awiya, urged Imam Ali to do against his staying true to his words, the words they initially forced him to take arbitration. They rebelled against him as Kharijites, those same People of Kufa lied to his son Imam Alhusayn calling on him to come to Kufa then switched side to the Umayyads killing him and his family after pledging support. Those Kufans are imbeciles and beyond imagination liars and despicables, then they felt shameful for betrying Alhusayn, they called upon Zaid ibn Ali to rebell and same thing betrayed him, and he was killed by Umayyads, the same happend to Muhammad Al Nafs Alzakiya, and rest of sons of Ahlu Albayt. The Yemenites were treacherous people except for few. Unfortunaty mosy of their descendants are Shia of Najaf and Karbala.
as a sunni muslim i would have prefered an ali's victory, but instead of decisevely finishing the job at Siffin and defeating mouawiya in position of power he was too pious and magnanimous but infortunatly this could be fatal as it was for julus ceaser, the abassids who claim the heretage of ali will show no mercy by killing all of the males of the ommayade dinasty.
I don't think the Abbasid claimed the heritage of Ali (may god be pleased with him) they claimed the leader of their movement to be someone from the prophet family, that's why a good portion of their supporters thought a descendant of Ali will be Caliph, and to appease these supporters and to kill any chance of rebellion from the Ummayyads (not Ayubbids which is Salah Aldin' dynasty)
just being muslim is enough, ali was the second muslim and muawiya accepted islam when there was no other choice, on the conquest of mecca. i'm a sunni muslim and for me he was the greatest among the prophet's companions.
@@Aliha1d3r actually Sunni is not someone who accepted Muawiyah as the Caliph. Sunnis actually is a non-aligned faction that accepts whoever came into power and they lived in the middle-way of everything. They love the Ahlalbayt, the Prophet's family and respect all the Sahabah. They don't talk bad about anyone of them. The Kharijite movement still lives, the ISIS and al-Qaeda are two examples in our time. Both were the products of Wahhabi Movements that is still flourishing in Saudi Arabia. Let the State, ruled by Saudis but the religion ruled by Alu-Syaikh (Muhammad Ibn Abd al-Wahhab family).
@@Hinata0928 that battle didn't ended in couple of hours, negotiations were involved and also many fought individual battles slaying many from army of Yazeed.
A massively underrated “what if” in early medieval history is what if Ali ditched his famed and fabled clemency for once against the opportunistic Muaweeya.
absolutely, it is sad how the corruption of Uthman had such consequences, even to this day! It is however important to know that this divide is today used by wahabis and other extremist for political influence.
@@jafaral-badri8005 Things today would be wildly different, and on a wild guess, quite possibly Kharijites would be the second largest sect. At the same time, I think Islam would be a far more contained religion and the conquests of Umayyads would most likely be replaced by a strong sense of unity in a more limited area with Buddhism and Nestorianism quite possibly replacing Tengrism in Central Asia rather than Sunni Islam. All of these are parts of a huge “what if” though.
@@fogshadow9112 its because shiaism became something else. It calls upon calling to saints (ali (ra) and his family). While this was not practiced by the companions and family of the prophet peace be upon him. Whereas throughout the quran u read that u cannot call upon anyone but allah. Shiaism is not merely a political difference but a theological difference as well.
@@fogshadow9112 If we look at history, we see that you rafidah are at the forefront of oppression against Muslims. It was Ibn al-Alqami the rafidhi who was working for the abbasids in Baghdad but secretly inviting the mongols to invade, which resulted in millions of Muslims being kiIIed and Baghdad being destroyed. Then if we look at today, it was the rafidah that asked America to invade Iraq which resulted again in about a million Muslims being kiIIed. America replaced saddam with an extremist rafidhi government that went around killing Sunnis just for having the names of the sahaba. The crimes of American funded shia militias in Iraq is well known. This is your history, oppression and treachery, allying with anyone you can against Muslims.
@@mohamudabdisalaan6155it is what it is, why is it wrong? Muawiyah was fighting ali ra and his son yazid killed hussein, it happened. Uthman secure the umayyad positions in the government while he was ruling
@@mohamudabdisalaan6155he never said sahaba, he said the enemies of the prophet and his family, are you saying that the sahaba are the enemies of the prophet?
Thank you for the marvelous narration. I couldn't agree more with the content of this nicely and neatly made video. Nevertheless, it's worth mentioning , as a sunni muslim myself, that the vast majority of sunnies prefer Ali to Muaawya. They are even incomparable from religious ranking point of view favouring Ali of course. The sunni public and commoners, at the time , subdued to Mouawya for the greater good of the Islamic dynasty rather than a matter of personal preference since he had the upper hand and he hadn't challenged the Islamic doctrine found by the prophet , neither did Ali of course, plus not wasting human resources and man power on interior conflict. The way we approach this dispute is that this is entirely political not religious. It's safe to say that Sunnis are pro-Ali and would stand by Ali by basic sunni islamic teachings. However, one way or another, nowadays shiite muslims blame the whole issue on Abu Bakr and Omar Ibn Al khattab, long before the assasination of Uthman , as they believe Ali takes precendence in succeding the prophet over the former two. To make the long story short, we ,Sunnis, are by no means antagonists to Ali. To the contrary, if it were left to us , by sunni doctrine, we would have chosen Ali over Muawya. Thank you again for the mind and soul enriching work of history you present to your audience. My favourite channel on any social media platform.
I disagree strongly to your view on Muawiyah and Umayyads. He was the main person who changed the ruling style, from a type of ruling which chose the ruler based on his merit to a hereditary one. Not to mention, his and his family's approach towards non Arabs and especially non-Muslims was very controversial and racist at best. Interestingly, the only Umayyad rulers who moved from this approach, which to some extent had its roots in pre-Islamic Arabia, was Umar II, who ironically was poisoned by Umayyads themselves. The Umayyads used this approach as a way to extort non-Muslims by increasing their Jizya, which made them rich while making the other parts of empire poor. Moreover, they used this extorted money to expand the empire, in order to add more non-Muslim subjects (and making themselves richer), without any consideration towards over-expansion, something that concerned Umar I very much.
Well said, an accusation Shias ever so endlessly make that "Sunnis hate Ali", may Allah be pleased with him, and all the companions, including Muawiyah, and may Allah grant them the highest degree in heaven for their great service to Allah and His prophet peace be upon him.
It's worth noting that most Sunnis would agree that Ali was in the right. But hindsight is 20/20 as they say. Regardless, it is called a fitnah (tribulation) for a reason.
that hadith of Ammar being killed by a wicked band of men is in Sahih Bukhari which is the most popular sunni book of hadith and this narration has been approved by all
From Some sources that i can trust, i found that, The group of people who murdered or assassinated Uthman is the same group which assassinated Ali This was the first major political issue in early islamic conquest, not a religion issue but political one
Uthman fought his own clan before with prophet Muhammad ﷺ before they become Muslims. Moreover, some of the Umayyad governors were appointed before the Caliphate of Uthman so I don't think that he wanted to strengthen his family power depending on his previous deeds.
Well, before omar passed away , he called for the next would be caliph to sack all the appointees in governing yet othman didn't do that , also the corruption of moauya was not new , cuz in the timeline of omar there was an incident were he caught Abu sufian having alot of coins and expensive jewelry when he returned from Syria, then omar called Abu sufian a lier and a thief like his son who stole Muslim wealth in Syria, TBH othman was weak he didn't had the strength, honesty and justice sense as Ali or omar.
@@Requeim4Hope this is a flawed argument because ali ra like usman ra before him had also given his relatives governorship over provinces... bottom line is both were giants among sahaba but didn't possess statesmanship like omar ra
@@alissa6 well, it's not at all black and white, it's in major grey, also open your mind a little bit and think if othman was that good then why he kept all the corrupts that omar order them to be sacked ? And why at the end most of the sahaba including aisha disagreed with him ?
@@ismail4900 in matter of fact , I have never seen a flawed argument like yours , omar him self ordered that all appointees to be sacked so omar definitely knew they were corrupt and he also called Abu sufian and his son liers and thieves ,so its either you know the truth and omar was an idiot or the fact that he is was right and the umayyads were a mafia
19:54 Good map, many people who make religious maps often ignore Shia minorities in of Turkey and Syria and Sunni minorities in the Balkans for some reason.
what do you think of Aisha (RA)? She is ahlul bayt and I heard a lot of shia hate her. Ali (RA) himself made peace with her and respected her so I just want to see if you guys also follow Ali (RA) in this.
@@temptemp4174 you're not a Sunni.Stop this nonsense.Anyone who says that Hazrat Muawiya(May Allah be pleased with him)was evil is himself an evil person.Hazrat Muawiya did some mistakes but he had good intentions in his heart.He had no grudge against Hazrat Ali (May Allah be pleased with him)
As someone born and raised in a shia community these videos thought me alot and I could see both perspectives from a neutral point of view. Thank you Kings and generals for another great video
@@mohammadaatif5222Ali was obviusly unfit for rule. He couldn't even control his own men yet, how was he going to control the entire caliphate. He also recruited the murderers of the third rightly guided caliph, Uthman, into his army, which was already the main reason for the problem between him and Muawiya. Againist to the requests of Muawiyah, he always avoided punishing them. Eventually His death came from them. He was a wonderful warrior but not a good politician.
@@mostafahussaini843 Sunni and Shia are 99% the same , people should focus on that . The childish insulting of dead companions is futile and still fighting over something that happened 1400 years ago is useless . Other then that religiously Sunni and Shia only have minor disagreements despite how big of a deal those in power try to make it . If you are Shia study the works of Sunni if you are Sunni study the works of Shia so that you know the conflict is politically driven
Khalid ibn Al Walid- Fertile Crescent Amr ibn Al As- Egypt Saad bin abi Waqqas - Persia All 3 major Rashidun generals had different preferences of conquest 🌝
@@asmrnaturecat984 well that's whay i meant to be honest because this 'persia' that I'm saying is persian empire cause the country called iran not persia anymore, but thanks for correcting me
Sooo may Allah forgive the killed and the killer ??? Can we say the same thing about the sons of prophet Adam (as) wich are Qabile and Habile ??? This is absolutely ridiculous which shows how fragile the “all the sahaba are awdol” means( all the companions of the prophet are alllll good and are going to heaven”
When the kharijites rebelled against Ali and rebuked him by saying: “authority belongs to God alone and not to you” he refuted them by saying: “These are words of truth intended for falsehood”.
if only people could understand Ali and follow his orders things would have been very good today. and also No one could beat him in a dual that's why they attacked him from back when he was praying.
The Main reason as to why Ali faced so Much opposition was that he like the Prophets & Their Successors before him was on a reforming mission & at that point in time in History the General State of the Muslim Community was that it had gotten used to Wrong & corrupted ways in Matters pertaining to religion & worldly life. Here he embarked upon a reforming mission upon assuming the Office - which was his duty & this upset the status quo as well as vested interests because it upset a unity based on falsehood. This led to so much conflict & rebellion resulting in splitting of families with brothers choosing differing sides like for instance the 2 sons of Khalid-ibn-al-Waleed. Abd-ul-Rahman-ibn-Khalid-bin-Walid on Muawiyas Side & Al-Muhajir-ibn-Khalid-bin-Waleed on Alis Side - Brother fought brother. If he(Ali) Wanted he could have spared all this bloodshed by compromising & continuing with the corrupt ways of his predecessors, yet he gave importance to his duty no matter the cost. Hence Ali Earned such a Lofty Status on Facing such adversity in the pursuit of his duties.
@@greeninja2728 veterans of wars especially at the time always suffered from muscle pains, scars that didn’t heal correctly, joint problems from being hit constantly, its actually very well documented how as time went on generals began to fight less and less if they were planning for big conquests because the scars and muscle damage and even bone damage pile up overtime, you dont come out of a fight stronger physically and in your old age it really shows These guys weren’t on treadmills and sophisticated equipment nor did they have a balanced athlete’s diet lol
Unfortunately, those who succeeded to the Caliphate after the first four Caliphs were greatly lacking in character and leadership qualities. They did not have the moral or spiritual calibre one would expect of Muslim leadership. They were not able to wear down the pagan attitudes and habits of their tribes. None of the Umayyad and the 'Abbasid Caliphs, with the solitary exception of 'Umar ibn 'Abdul Aziz came fully up to the standard of Islam.
@@yehyaali4701 Umar ibn Abdulaziz is the 6th, because the 6 months that Hasan RA ruled are included in the Hadith that states that the Rashidun Caliphate would last 30 years
@@oneeyed1055 this person seems to not realize we sunnis literally call Ali (RA) the final rightly guided caliph. Mua'wiah (RA) is called the first ummayyad caliph. we still respect Mua'wiah (RA) but understand who was the better leader.
@@tranium67 don't take history from people who barely know their own fathers ( meaning they don't know their roots or they don't have fathers). let alone their knowledge on people who know their roots , religion..etc ( muslims ).
It was fully accepted by the scholars of Ahlus Sunnah that in the battles between Hz. Ali KW and Muawiya R.A , it was Ali R.A who was right and the truth was always with him.
The content was awesome as usual.But a bit correction expected to be made,the fellow of Sunni Islam strongly believe that Muawiyah's (ra.) way of ruling was 'Ijtehadi' (understandingly) wrong untill his ruling.
Wow so leading muslims into an all out war on the righteous caliphate and the cousin of the prophet and his son in law and killing tens of thousands of muslims is just a misunderstanding and ijtehad ??? You really need to check your religion man
Kudos to k&g man this is a very sensitive issue among muslim many scholars here refrain from discussing this issue but you described this perfectly and your research is amazing!
Many historical inaccuracies in this video. Biggest one which I'll correct is that Caliph Hassan ibn Ali didn't give power to Amir Muawiyah due to any kind or pressure or threat, rather he did it willingly from a standpoint of utmost magnanimity and asceticism. He gives a beffiting response to the propoganda in his own striking words: "Al-Hasan said: “The skulls of the Arabs were in my hands, they would make peace with whom I make peace and they would fight whom I fight, I left it all to seek the face of God and to stop bloodshed among Muslims .” [Source: al-Baladhuri in Ansab al-Ashraf 3/49]
Excellent correction. Al Hasan and Muawiyah came to a mutual agreement. Hasan was not pressured, but rather feared that bloodshed would increase and so deemed it would be better if Muawiyah was to be negotiated with. Hasan would rule the caliphate and then Muawiyah would rule after him
Yes, but you didn't mention what Muwaiya did, after the agreement and he become Caliphate, Muwiya said: Hasan Ibn Ali's agreement is under my foot! Muwiya is simply a non-religious and hypocrite person part of the agreement was that not to allow his son to become caliphate, but in reality he gave it to his son Yazeed ibn Muwaiya, this is part of Muwiya's dirty plan
Your so called correction is literally just a sunni biased perspective. Let neutrals tell history without being tainted by personal beliefs. The sunni narrative is NOT the only point of view that deserves to be told.
14:39 "these al khawarij, or kharijites as they would later be called" ...al khawarij is the arabic name and kharijites is in english, so it's just a translation, not something they were "later called."
@@ChevyChase301 the arabic word is still used now by Muslims when they mention this group, its only a tiny group of western orientalists who use this word "kharijites", it isn't and was never a common way to refer to the khawarij.
@@ChevyChase301 you can't just change things, or rename the things from far land culture and it's linguistics Even after this day n age, majority says khawarij
One thing you forgot to mention, which is why the arbitration failed. After the verdict would be issued, both arbiters were supposed, on the behalf of their followers, to remove their leaders (ali and muawiyya ) from power and give the council of shura, the companions and leaders, the right to decide the new caliph. Musa started first, removing ali, but then amr did not, and demanded that the council accept muawiyya thus as the new caliph, even though by most sources muawiyya had not openly ordered anything similar, which is why ali left. Would have been nice also if you spoke a bit about the other factions (mu'tazila and murjia) because of their important role later.
I knew there was a mistake, studying Ali’s life I know how much of a righteous man he was and there is no way he refused to let go of his power just because he wanted to stay in power
Amr ibn as was sahabi which we respect but here he was the traitor as he talk with musa that we both will give athority to shura after that musa believe amr and after this you know litrally betrayed him and you can clearly see when muawiya amr ibne as the governor of egypt well prophet stated all sahabi the fitna of wealth come to you so ask allah for forgiveness
Ali was obviusly unfit for rule. He couldn't even control his own men yet, how was he going to control the entire caliphate. He also recruited the murderers of the third rightly guided caliph, Uthman, into his army, which was already the main reason for the problem between him and Muawiya. Againist to the requests of Muawiyah, he always avoided punishing them. Eventually His death came from them. He was a wonderful warrior but not a good politician.
@@williamrobert9898 Ali was chosen by Muslims after Usman as a caliph. Whereas Muawiya was just a powerthirsty governor who wanted to rule, used religion and revenge of Usman's death as a pretext and caused chaos in the Muslim world. If bringing justice to Usman was his priority, why didn't he punish his murderers after he got power?
@@ZahraAli-ev6hd Are you sure he didn't? I could've sworn K&G mentioned that Muawiya actually started many campaigns against them to the point where they actually fled westwards towards the land of the Maghreb
@@budakbaongsiah Iran had ties with India due to Pakistan's (unfortunate) decision to ally with the US, however I'm hopeful that Pakistani relations with Iran will improve now that Pakistan has left the US bloc
@@ibadurrehman1210 Oh so it's USA's fault that most Islamic countries are not friendly with Iran and not themselves? Are muslim countries so inept that the USA can just swoop in like the colonizers of old?
@@budakbaongsiah you misunderstood my point, what I'm trying to say is that Muslim countries made unfortunate choices and created conflict within themselves
A united peoples, kingdom or religion goes on a winning streak, gains power and riches, then fragments into civil war. Crazy how this repeats time and time again. The riches of an after life are reward enough for the poor but not those who seek power in the here and now.
there are some bigs point events missing in this video Laylat al-Harir : Laylat al-Harir was a rough night during the battle of Siffin. The armies of Imam Ali (a) and Mu'waiya fought in that night and many soldiers of both sides were killed. According to al-Minqari, in that night, there was no sound heard except the sound of hitting the swords which was more terrifying in the hearts of men than the sound of thunder or horrifying fall of mountains.[1] Ibn Miskawayh described that night, "They fought in that night, so hard that spears broke and no arrow was left in quivers and then they began fighting with swords."[2] In Laylat al-Harir, the soldiers of Imam Ali (a) were close to victory, until Ash'ath rose among al-Kindis, gave a sermon and with a peace-making tone, asked for stopping more bloodshed. According to hadiths, as soon as Mu'awiya was informed about the sermon of Ash'ath, ordered to put the copies of the Qur'an on the spears.[3] Arbitration : hen the army of Mu'awiya was about to be defeated because of the attacks made by Malik al-Ashtar, Mu'awiya asked 'Amr b. al-'As for advice.[4] By the suggestion of 'Amr b. al-'As and the order of Mu'awiya, people of Syria put volumes of the Qur'an on their spears, shouting: "O' people of Iraq! Let God be the arbiter between us". According to some accounts, they also shouted: "O' Arab people! Think about your women and daughters. If you die, who is going to fight the Romans, Turks and the Persians?"[5] They thereby asked for ending the war. Imam Ali (a) ordered his army to continue the war, but most people in his army wanted to accept the arbitration. Thus Imam Ali (a) had to accept the arbitration.[6] Imam Ali (a) proposed Abd Allah b. Abbas or Malik al-Ashtar as his arbiter, and proposed Ahnaf b. Qays as a second or third arbiter, but some people did not accept his suggestions, and imposed Abu Musa al-Ash'ari to Imam Ali (a) as an arbiter. And people of Syria elected 'Amr b. al-'As as their representative for arbitration.[7] The two arbiters decided that 'Amr b. al-'As announces the removal of Mu'awiya from power, and Abu Musa al-Ash'ari announces the removal of Ali b. Abi Talib (a) from power, leaving the election of the Caliph to a council. 'Amr b. al-'As asked Abu Musa to announce the result of the arbitration ahead of him. Thus Abu Musa al-Ash'ari announced the removal of Imam Ali (a) from power, but when it came to 'Amr b. al-'As, instead of announcing the removal of Mu'awiya from power, he confirmed the dismissal of Imam Ali (a) by Abu Musa, and appointed Mu'awiya as the Caliph. After this, there was a quarrel between these two arbiters and they cursed each other.[8] 1.Ibn Muzāḥim, Waqʿat ṣiffīn, p. 475. 2.Ibn Miskawayh, Tajārub al-umam, vol. 1, p. 535. 3.Ibn Muzāḥim, Waqʿat ṣiffīn, p. 480-481; Dīnawarī, al-Akhbār al-ṭiwāl, p. 188-189. 4.Ibn Abī l-Ḥadīd, Sharḥ nahj al-balāgha, vol. 2, p. 210. 5.Ibn Muzāḥim, Waqʿat ṣiffīn, p. 478. 6.Ibn Muzāḥim, Waqʿat ṣiffīn, p. 490. 7.Ibn Aʿtham, al-Futūḥ, vol. 4, p. 197-198. 8.Ibn Muzāḥim, Waqʿat ṣiffīn, p. 545.
From what I have learnt from this videos on early Islamic history and it culture it was quite impressive and well learned and part of where knowledge on stargazing and medicine and maths just to name a few of things we whole world should recognise
Thank God, it is a big honor and pride that I am a Shia Muslim, a follower of Imam Ali (p.b.u.h) the real and the legitimate successor of prophet Muhammad (p.b.u.h), and not the hijacked powers and coup leaders. And plus that I am from decedent of Imam Ali through his som Imam Hussein (p.b.u.h)
20:18 why didn't you mention that the sunnah believes that Ali is better than Muawiyah? as if shia choose Ali and sunnah choose muawyah Sunnah is obeying the prophet and Quran sunnah is the mainstream Islam evin Ali was a sunni
The way you explain the Kharajite movement makes it sound like something a modern intelligence agency would think up to annoy an enemy state. Not that I'm necessarily arguing with that idea.
As A Muslim, I would say my heartfelt farewell to Rashidun Caliphate, Most Just and rightful Islamic Caliphate ever. Thank for your countless sacrifices and preaching for spreading Islam ❤☪️ ❤ around the world.
This somewhat reminds me of the civil war between Caesar and the Senate. It is miraculous that the Sassanids and Byzantines didn't make any gains during this civil war, or that the Gauls didn't rise up when the Romans were going at each other
The Romans tried and gathered an army, but Mu’awiyah wrote them a letter saying he would reconcile with Ali and unite against them if they tried to invade, at that point the Romans got scared and abandoned their plan
Constans II reclaimed armenia for a while and forced mauwiyah for tribute but he was just fresh out from his defeat at mast , Constans Ii was smart emperor and knew his limits so he didn't push for more , he mostly used the respite to focus on the west defeated the Slavic draguvites and creating the first themes
I love your channel, but your this video is not kinda neutral, as you mentioned in this video that "ACCORDING TO PRO ALI ACCOUNTS : Ammar would be killed by band of wicked men" i dont know from where you get the source however this narration of prophet is mentioned in Sahih Muslim 2916, Jami tirmidhi 3800 and almost all the 6 authentic sunni hadith books. It is a very popular and widely narratrd hadith so i dont get it that why did you mentioned "pro ali accounts".
This video is more informative and authentic than many so-called scholars of Islam lectures on these topics. The bottom line is that Ali was a righteous man, elected by the general public, and was on the right in all his battle. Time has proved this again and again.
![The Fitna [Al-Jamal And As-Siffin]](/img/1.gif)
Check out our complete series on the Warhammer Fantasy Universe and the Human Empire of Sigmar: ruclips.net/video/bn1Oj9QEf3U/видео.html
Pls battle of tarain 1191-1192
Hi king and generals could you please make a video about the qramita senescence there topic is unknown for many people and I think that their topic is one of the most surprising topics in history.
@@clarkstartrek French Wars of Religion is on our list
People continue the series on crime syndicates
Please continue Alexander the Great conquest
I feel sorry for Ali, he seemed like an upright honourable man who tried to do the right thing while holding on to power. If Ali had been more ruthless and underhanded like Muawiya, he perhaps would have won the Fitna.
He was fighting for his principles, not for the throne! That is why following his principles were more important than some battle victories for Ali, the honorable rashidun Imam Caliph
You are right, my friend. I would recommend you look deeper into the history of Ali. During the Prophet’s lifetime he was the champion of Islam, their greatest warrior who was decisive in countless battles. But he was always a man of principle and morals first, never a conqueror. He sought peace even when it meant he did not achieve total victory. This life was but a passing thing for him.
@@widodoakrom3938 he burnt some gays you know he was strong not soft ,rather honest and honorable man not like muawia
It really makes you wonder how many honorable men who have died because they didn't want to be overly cruel. In war you have to ruthless. Willing to do more and endure more and do so faster, more efficient and for longer. Anything less and someone decides they can do your job better than you.
@@geordiejones5618 True but some men would rather die for their principles than live selfishly and cruelly. In the end they’re all going to die, and now history remembers Ali far better than it remembers someone like Muawiyah.
As a Muslim who's been taught about all of these early Islamic conflicts, I appreciate this video alot and have learned a Thing or two from it. Thanks again
Same, as an agnostic Westerner it annoys me to no end how little emphasis public schools place on World History, we get it Europe had a "Dark Age" but Islam was literally experiencing their golden age at the exact same time! Also China was chugging along as usual being the most important exporter on the planet for luxuries, followed closely by India & SE Asia
@@ericcloud1023 SE asia ? you mean southeast asia ?
@@no5829 yessir
Be careful about this
Not everything in these video is right
@@محمديونس-7 he got the information for the same sources u might have came across, everyone has their own say on many different sources that I’ve read but don’t know what to believe
I am just amazed how Kings and Generals finds the details and narrates with such a great comprehensiveness
Well that's how well documented early Islamic history is.
It just makes me wonder how people can suggest it's all a conspiracy
Its too bad learning history with an engaging narrator was not an option for me during high school
@@belasstrongestwarrior it is mommy
Wikipedia
And talks about it objectively without a religious or political slant. Just the facts.
I have never went through such a strictly neutral & nearly accurate narration of Early Muslim History. Appreciation to K&G for their work.
It's really interesting once you take the Islamic aspect of this out of the picture and focus on the political and military aspect of the times. The Islamic faith might as well have originated on another planet, I am no way implying it's not as valid as the other major faiths but it's far more complex and would make Game of Thrones writers blush. I have studied it and still don't understand all of it's quirks and factions. However I am good at understanding politics. These Muslim Expansion videos give much needed context to the struggle we face today in the modern middle east.
@@JRGProjects tbf having to understand the religious splits and minor doctrinal differences and divergences of Christian and Buddhist denominations is probably equally as esoteric/opaque as would be any sufficiently widespread religion, Islam just has the benefit of being relatively young and decently centralized for much of its early formation
@@Laakien agreed. The time we are experiencing is what Christianity and even Judaism experienced long ago. The 30 Years War Protestants vs Catholics or the Jewish Faith's back and forth wars in Israel in the Old Testament. Islam is in it's growing pain period but eventually like the others I believe they will grow out of it.
@@JRGProjects its actually extremely simple from my experience as a muslim, i am assuming the complexities are abt islamic sects. But i mean there r only 2, shia’s and sunni’s everything else is related to one of them.
It's not subjective narration!
It's most influenced by Shia sources
Ali ibn Abi Talib was special. It is said that one who can wield a sword in the battle and can fight courageously cannot be good with qalam(🖋️ pen) and is cold hearted. One who is a philosopher or good with writing cannot be good at fighting as they are soft hearted. But Ali was a fierce and unmatched warrior in the battle field yet being extremely soft hearted, kind and forgiving alongside. Being the best in all areas of human endeavour.
Ali was obviusly unfit for rule. He couldn't even control his own men yet, how was he going to control the entire caliphate. He also recruited the murderers of the third rightly guided caliph, Osman, into his army, which was already the main reason for the problem between him and Muawiya. Againist to the demands of Muawiyah, he always avoided punishing them. He was a wonderful warrior but not a good politician.
@@sourweed9818 Keep spamming this comment. The truth is Ali was a greater warrior and a greater ruler than any of the other ‘Caliphs’. It was jealously and hatred for him that led to the instability and war during his reign.
@@mclovinjr9086 i am spreading the truth. He protected the murderers, and his death came at the hands of the murderers he protected. If he had gotten rid of them in the first place and showed his authority, neither Muawiya nor anyone else would have dare to anything againist him.
@@sourweed9818 You’re a liar. Answer me clearly, are you calling Ali unjust? Are you saying Ali prevented justice by protecting murderers? Because if you say this, you against the words of the Prophet PBUH.
@@mclovinjr9086 yes. And i am not saying anything to againist Prophet. Weak hadithes cannot be taken into account. There is nothing in Quran about Ali. Ali was Just a human like anybody else. Only Prophets are infallible not their sons in law.
My heart deeply pours out in favour of Ali (as). He was such brave, kind and upright man and above all the nearest to Prophet Muhammad (pbuh).
Ali was obviusly unfit for rule. He couldn't even control his own men yet, how was he going to control the entire caliphate. He also recruited the murderers of the third rightly guided caliph, Othman, into his army, which was already the main reason for the problem between him and Muawiya. Againist to the demands of Muawiyah, he always avoided punishing them. Eventually His death came from them. He was a wonderful warrior but not a good politician.
@@sourweed9818 Your hatred for Ali will curse you and your family for generations to come. Beware.
@@mclovinjr9086 I can not hate someone who married with Prophet's daughter. Cut that shia bias. I love Ali as much as i love Uthman. And yes Uthman made a lot of mistakes too. But Uthman was the leader of the Ummah which Ali pledged allegiance too. Those who murdered him should have been prosecuted rather than protected. And you know that very well too. What can be expected from a rafidi who sees Omar's zoroastrian murderer, which Ali pledged allegiance too, as a hero
@@sourweed9818 he could control his men easily. He refused to use the same vile tactics that Muawayiah would liberally use. Muawayiah didn’t care much for Uthman killers as he didn’t pursue them or really supported uthman during his reign. Also, who was the murderer who was in Ali army
The Prophet (ﷺ) passed by `Ammar and removed the dust off his head and said, "May Allah be merciful to `Ammar. He will be killed by a rebellious group. `Ammar will invite them to (obey) Allah and they will invite him to the (Hell) fire."
Sahih al-Bukhari 2812.
During the Battle of Siffin, Caliph Ali challenged Muawiah for a one on one battle; so that all the conflict be resolved once and for all with minimum bloodshed. Hearing this, the conqueror of Egypt, Amr ibn Al A'as told muawiah that he is left with no other choice but to accept this. Ali has made a fair offer!
Muawiah responded, "Ali has killed each and every person he ever faced in battle! How can a one on one duel against him be a fair offer?"
Reference: After the Prophet by Leslie Hazleton
Damn looks like he was a feared duelist
@@williamrobert9898 indeed he was
اجرکم الی الله.
@@williamrobert9898 'Ali, Khalid ibn Walid, and 'Umar ibn Khattab was among the most feared and renowned champions of the Muslim world back then. However, unlike most of them, 'Ali was not only a strongman, but also a scholar. He's a genius bruiser.
@@williamrobert9898 Ali was the banner carrier in at least a dozen different battles in his late teens and 20's. He was the right hand of Muhammad ﷺ during the establishment of Islam, defeating the most feared champions and breaking through staunch forts. In the battles shown in this video Ali was in his late 50's but was still a warrior to be reckoned with.
I feel like the mention that a sizeable portion of Ali's army (In both Siffin and the battle of the camel shown in the previous video) were the rebels (Who would eventually become the Kharijites) who had originally taken up arms against Uthman and eventually had him killed is needed. Another point being that the three men who carried out the assassination attempts, were part of the Kharijite movement (The assassin of Ali having being a part of the Kharijite army who fought Ali at Nahrawan) and they viewed the 3 men (Ali, Muawyia and Amr) has heretics deserving to be killed. Also a small sidenote, Ali's son Al Hassan did assume the title of caliph for a short of time (and is considered to be the fifth rashidun caliph by some sources), but then ceded it to Muwayia, according to most Islamic sources to prevent further bloodshed in the Islamic world. Nonetheless another great video, keep up the awesome work!
@@ChevyChase301 No they didn't it was an internal affair unfortunately .
@@ChevyChase301 nope, the persians were essentially fully subsumed into the islamic world and the only rebel remnants were taking refuge in china. Those remenants later were defeated by the ummayyads.
The romans had their own problems and probably couldn't do much even if they had wanted to.
It's propaganda because those who protested against Uthman R.A were mostly companions . It's a propaganda from some factions of the Ahlus Sunnah but many accept this reality. It was due to the corrupt governors that most people protested against the government.
E.g Talha R.A is considered to be one of those who were part of the protest against Uthman R.A. and he was against Ali R.A in battle of camel.
sahih bukhari 2812
Narrated `Ikrima: that Ibn `Abbas told him and `Ali bin `Abdullah to go to Abu Sa`id and listen to some of his narrations; So they both went (and saw) Abu Sa`id and his brother irrigating a garden belonging to them. When he saw them, he came up to them and sat down with his legs drawn up and wrapped in his garment and said, (During the construction of the mosque of the Prophet) we carried the adobe of the mosque, one brick at a time while `Ammar used to carry two at a time. The Prophet passed by `Ammar and removed the dust off his head and said, May Allah be merciful to `Ammar. He will be killed by a rebellious aggressive group. `Ammar will invite them to (obey) Allah and they will invite him to the (Hell) fire.
Thanks!
Ali was the most noble and chivalrous man of his time.
Abu bakar was close friends with prophet muhammed (SAW) and will be amongts the people of jannah
Imam Ali was the most noble and chivalrous man of ALL time.
@@Sahih_Muslim_1821a Abu bakar as saddiq (RA) is better im pretty sure
@@Lzali10469 guys stop the fitna for the love of allah both of them are great sahabi’s who are we to make opinions on who’s better? Stop this for the sake of allah .
@@Lzali10469 Tell me one reason on why Abubakr is better. Imam Ali (A.S) is better for many many reasons.
It’s more complicated than people think. Ali didn’t agree with the entirety of the caliphs but accepted peace as long as it prevented bloodshed. The conspiracy of killing Othman was large and the enemies of Ali were involved. When Othman was killed it was the same people who had a hand in his death who blaimed Ali. Later the people asked Ali to be caliph and he refused to take the position if they consider him just another “fourth” caliph. But when Ali saw things going south he finally agreed to take leadership.
This is the best history channel ever, King and General on my top watchlist coz introduce with history of world including Muslim world and Christian World.
Much of this video is wrong though sadly
@@zccau2316 show me the right one
@@zccau2316 Why do you think it's wrong
@@sigitprabowo363 check out Farid responds on this topic and Yasir Qadhi also has a good lecture too. The problem is much of this video is from Shia sources but the problem with Shia sources is no one knows who relates them unlike Sunni sources where all biographies of the people are written down too
Do check my playlist akhii doubt clear 🙌🏼💯
This brings tears to my eyes. God have mercy on your subject
Thanks
Huge respect and love for Ali ❤
His wily enemies saw Ali's kindness as his weakness
Ali (as) personally selected Malik al-Ashtar and Abdullah ibn Abbas (his first cousin) from his army for arbitration. But many people from the army of Ali rejected his choice and selected Abu Musa al-Ashari as their choice. On which Ali was really disappointed as no one didn't follow his order.
Kab tak Ali r.a ke naam se apni dukaan chalaoge.. Allah ka Deen kisi ka mohtaj nahi... Ali r.a khud Allah ke Deen ke mohtaj hai..
@@hussamuddin2361 dukaan aapki chalti hogi. Allah ke sabse zyada mehboob Maula Ali (as) hain. Unse ishq aur muhabbat emaan ka hissa hai. Pta nahi konsi dukaan ki baat kar rhe ho tum
He recruited the murderers of the third rightly guided caliph, Uthman, into his army, which was already the main reason for the problem between him and Muawiya. Againist to the requests of Muawiyah, he always avoided punishing them. Eventually His death came from them. He was a wonderful warrior but not a good politician.
@@sourweed9818 Ali a.s was not unfit for rule. Usman introduced nepotism in his caliphate by bringing Marwan ibn Hakam into Medina who was exiled by the Holy Prophet. Ali was the one for whom the Prophet said "Ali is with the truth and the truth is with Ali".
"Ali and I are the fathers of this nations"
@@murtazaraza7605 Prophet did not say that. That hadith is a weak narration and it is most likely a fabrication. There is nothing in Quran explicity about Ali. If God had a such an intention about him, he surely explicitly would reveal it.
Beautifully made, I really love this channel a treasure of gold.
Another prophecy of the Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him came true when he predicted that after him would rule the 'Caliphate of Prophecy' for thirty years. 2 of Abu Bakr, 10 of Umar, 12 of Uthman, 5.5 of Ali and Al Hassan ibn Ali ruled for 6 months before ceding his rule to Muawiyah (May Allah be pleased with them all). Also Al Hassan was prophesied by the Prophet to be a leader who would bring peace to two large dissenting groups of Muslims which did happen!
Prophecied in what books written by people who killed Ali and hussain i have deeply read the Islamic history and realized that most of the people who were corrupt and killers end up writing their own history for Islam most of it is one sided doesn't really matter if you are shia or sunni
@@officialtechtracker the killers of Hussain were the shias of kufa who you rafidha take most of your Hadiths from
@@Theshowoffcollector do some proper research mate. Yes, some of the army against Husayn consisted of Kufans, but not all of them. Habib ibn Madhahir and a few others from Kufa were on Husayn's side. Everyone else was either killed, jailed. or prevented from leaving
@@Theshowoffcollector sahih bukhari 2812
Narrated `Ikrima: that Ibn `Abbas told him and `Ali bin `Abdullah to go to Abu Sa`id and listen to some of his narrations; So they both went (and saw) Abu Sa`id and his brother irrigating a garden belonging to them. When he saw them, he came up to them and sat down with his legs drawn up and wrapped in his garment and said, (During the construction of the mosque of the Prophet) we carried the adobe of the mosque, one brick at a time while `Ammar used to carry two at a time. The Prophet passed by `Ammar and removed the dust off his head and said, May Allah be merciful to `Ammar. He will be killed by a rebellious aggressive group. `Ammar will invite them to (obey) Allah and they will invite him to the (Hell) fire.
@@Theshowoffcollector the people of kufa betrayed imam huseyn they didnt kill him as they themselves suffered under the hands of hajjaj thaqafi
an important period in the history of Egypt which I love !!! It's time to find out more! I love this channel! ❤❤❤
Hey I watched your video of Egypt it's a great one keep up the good work
@Leo The British-Eurasian thank you ✌
@@khaledramadan7922 thank you 😊❤
@Badir Alotaibi
Islamic not Arabian..
Sister are you interested in Islamic history
There's a little problem with the animation. Ali was leading his men at the front, while Muawiya was behind his.
Ali was obviusly unfit for rule. He couldn't even control his own men yet, how was he going to control the entire caliphate. He also recruited the murderers of the third rightly guided caliph, Osman, into his army, which was already the main reason for the problem between him and Muawiya. Againist to the demands of Muawiyah, he always avoided punishing them. Eventually His death came from them. He was a wonderful warrior but not a good politician.
@@sourweed9818 where you physically present at the time to fairly and justly assess the current of events of the time without any biases?! The truth of the matter is, we'll never fully know the nuances and details that affected each men to do what they did in that time of their lives. So calling one men or another unfit/wrong on the sole basis of hearsay is simply unrighteous and unwise. Only ALLAH swt knows the true motivators of men back then AND now, AND forever.
Also I've seen this comment copy pasted all over the place, what is your goal?! Maybe you're spreading truth; However it's from YOUR pov. It just incites more argument and division, rushed and unwise. What our Ummah needs is Unity, not Division.
And what better words to inspire unity of our Ummah than ones lying within the noble Quran, absolute truth from the all knowing.
May peace be unto you brother in faith, and may the seekers of truth and peace keep on seeking! :)
@@sourweed9818 Вопрос не в том что кто мог а кто больше всего достоин
@@keepitjazzy7349
The sources that claim Imam Ali was on the fronts are the same sources you take as accountable in this series of historical events. Denying this while still accepting other accounts from the same sources whitout any logic1l or historical reason would be irrational . - the sources are abundant if you were to ask , which is called "mutawatir" in arabic , means if these sources are not accountable , nothing then would be accountable -
It's is nearly a fact brother . May god bless you with his teachings
Wrong. It was confirmed that Ali was in the front line. But you are a nasbi@@elmehdinaimi8621
Beautiful, neutral, unbiased narration from reliable sources
I hope everyone who watches this feels the same way. No one is taking any sides here. Without any religious bias or political speculation, only the facts known to history and agreed upon by all parties are present. Peace be upon you all.
Even though knowing the outcome of this conflict and the assassination of the İmam Ali, still hurts to hear his death on the video
Do check my playlist akhii doubt clear 🙌🏼💯
Exactly my thoughts. While watching this video I was hoping Ali would win 😭😭😭
@@neemapaxima6116 not necessarily true
@Samtic people are the best. he may have contributed to it but he is not the only one who brought Islam to where it is today.
And Islam is not supposed to be where it is today.
@Samtic people are the best. I am not denying that those things did not happen because of him. I know somewhat about the contribution of the Umayyads into the expansion of Islam. You should read my comment before replying like that.
I am just not a big fan Muawiya, how he did not honor his agreement with Hassan.
Another great and insightful video. Great animation and illustrations. You're doing a wonderful job.
Thank you K&G for the knowledges. Hope Allah blessed you always.
Many things I knew but didn't understand well enough, now all makes sense. Thank you Kings and Generals Team.
I have never seen a narrative more accurate and unbiased anywhere good job 👍
Truly great take on what objectively happened to cause the rift; not a religious or political slant to it. Everyone was in the wrong, and so it split four great sects of Islam.
@@williamyoung9401 everyone was definitely not in the wrong
Ali is with haq and haq is with Ali.
No
@@mustafaabdirahimmohamed9578 so according to you Muawiya lanati was right ....
Ali was obviusly unfit for rule. He couldn't even control his own men yet, how was he going to control the entire caliphate. He also recruited the murderers of the third rightly guided caliph, Uthman, into his army, which was already the main reason for the problem between him and Muawiya. Againist to the requests of Muawiyah, he always avoided punishing them. Eventually His death came from them. He was a wonderful warrior but not a good politician.
@@sourweed9818 this is your personal opinion and nothing more. The Prophet sawa himself stated that Ali is with haq and haq is with Ali. I would prefer going with what the Prophet said rather than you.
Also you said “rightly guided caliph, Uthman”. Interesting, can you show me one instance where the Prophet appointed either Abu bakr, Umar or Uthman (la on all) as the rightful successor after him? Seems like a serious title to give someone without backing it up.
@@mustafaabdirahimmohamed9578so your against the words of the prophet its written in your books ali is with the truth and the truth is with Ali
finally I was waiting for this battle
Thanks K&G, very well researched and articulated presentation of historically important event. Subscribed.
What an amazing video. Historically very accurate and also with least bias. I wish for every muslim to watch this and learn about their history. Hopefully people will see the main source of division that is so apparent in our early history and even stubbornly followed to this day.
Ali was the greatest & the most merciful Caliph in Islamic history. I love Ali, the man of his word, the man of honor.
Ali killed Iranians as much as he could like any other Arab.
Calm down
I don't know why people keep glorifying him he was a loser . He lost to Muawiyah and because of him the muslim Ummah was left to herditary monarchies
@@kambiz7556 you’re confusing Ali with Umar
Imam Ali never participated in the wars of the first 3 caliphs
@@kambiz7556
Everyone killed everyone in middle ages . And persians were no better !
I am sunni and love Ali RA to the bottom of my heart. He suffered throughought his caliphate from his own followers.
It's sad how sunnis killed the prophet Muhamad's family
@@RocketAfriqueZA
There was no Shia back then. Umar was killed by a Persian majoosi, uthman and Ali were killed by muslims.
Thousands of muslims were killed by Yazid in makkah.
The ones who killed hussein were from Kufa. They sent him letters to invite him there and they betrayed him. The same kufan joined Zaid bin Hussein but abandoned him to his death alone.
When you revolt and fight against the government, you pay dearly. Iran is an example, people are killed everyday because they want regime change.
It was political reason back then and even now in Iran, so don't try to bring theology into this matter
The betrayal came mughira ibn Shiba
@@nasserm.nasser5087 shia did exist back then and even the prophet mentions them
@@nasserm.nasser5087Brother he didnt mean Shia, he meant the Kufans who were Yemenite tribes migrants to the city of Kufa the capital of Ali which was initially built by Caliph Umar to act as defensible position in case Persians regained strength and tried to attack Arabia, there wil be defensible position on Euphrates in Kufa. Those Kufans who fought under Ali are the same ones who pushed for arbitration with Mua'wiya when Imam Ali advised against it and tehy rejected Imam Ali's select judges such as Abdullah ibn Abbas, in favor of Abu Musa Al Ashaari because of his Yemenite background, Abu Musa didnt like Imam Ali, he helped rule Arbitration in favor of Mu'awiya. Those same Yemenites imbeciles, learned of their grave mistake for losing face against Mu'awiya, urged Imam Ali to do against his staying true to his words, the words they initially forced him to take arbitration. They rebelled against him as Kharijites, those same People of Kufa lied to his son Imam Alhusayn calling on him to come to Kufa then switched side to the Umayyads killing him and his family after pledging support. Those Kufans are imbeciles and beyond imagination liars and despicables, then they felt shameful for betrying Alhusayn, they called upon Zaid ibn Ali to rebell and same thing betrayed him, and he was killed by Umayyads, the same happend to Muhammad Al Nafs Alzakiya, and rest of sons of Ahlu Albayt. The Yemenites were treacherous people except for few. Unfortunaty mosy of their descendants are Shia of Najaf and Karbala.
as a sunni muslim i would have prefered an ali's victory, but instead of decisevely finishing the job at Siffin and defeating mouawiya in position of power he was too pious and magnanimous but infortunatly this could be fatal as it was for julus ceaser, the abassids who claim the heretage of ali will show no mercy by killing all of the males of the ommayade dinasty.
I don't think the Abbasid claimed the heritage of Ali (may god be pleased with him) they claimed the leader of their movement to be someone from the prophet family, that's why a good portion of their supporters thought a descendant of Ali will be Caliph, and to appease these supporters and to kill any chance of rebellion from the Ummayyads (not Ayubbids which is Salah Aldin' dynasty)
The Abbasid caliphs are descended from “Abbas” the prophets uncle also Ali’s uncle, they’re not descended from Ali
just being muslim is enough, ali was the second muslim and muawiya accepted islam when there was no other choice, on the conquest of mecca. i'm a sunni muslim and for me he was the greatest among the prophet's companions.
@@Aliha1d3r actually Sunni is not someone who accepted Muawiyah as the Caliph. Sunnis actually is a non-aligned faction that accepts whoever came into power and they lived in the middle-way of everything. They love the Ahlalbayt, the Prophet's family and respect all the Sahabah. They don't talk bad about anyone of them.
The Kharijite movement still lives, the ISIS and al-Qaeda are two examples in our time. Both were the products of Wahhabi Movements that is still flourishing in Saudi Arabia. Let the State, ruled by Saudis but the religion ruled by Alu-Syaikh (Muhammad Ibn Abd al-Wahhab family).
If People followed the order of their rightful imam instead of a random dude, the world would be much better place
Yes I have been looking forward to this. The last long form Muslim Expansion videos should be Emmy Award winners.
Looks like I found a new favorite channel.
Great series, keenly waiting for the next episode
There is need to cover the battle of Karbala(680AD) and its aftermath, as it is most important phase in the caliphate age.
I’m pretty sure he already covered the battle of Karbala, search for it in his channel and I’m sure you’ll find it
Kullu ardin Karbala
@@zaidatimash713 no it is covered just as a reference
They covered the battle of Karbala in the Schism in Islam episode. And the aftermath too were put also on that video.
@@Hinata0928 that battle didn't ended in couple of hours, negotiations were involved and also many fought individual battles slaying many from army of Yazeed.
A massively underrated “what if” in early medieval history is what if Ali ditched his famed and fabled clemency for once against the opportunistic Muaweeya.
absolutely, it is sad how the corruption of Uthman had such consequences, even to this day! It is however important to know that this divide is today used by wahabis and other extremist for political influence.
@@jafaral-badri8005 Things today would be wildly different, and on a wild guess, quite possibly Kharijites would be the second largest sect. At the same time, I think Islam would be a far more contained religion and the conquests of Umayyads would most likely be replaced by a strong sense of unity in a more limited area with Buddhism and Nestorianism quite possibly replacing Tengrism in Central Asia rather than Sunni Islam.
All of these are parts of a huge “what if” though.
@@fogshadow9112 its because shiaism became something else.
It calls upon calling to saints (ali (ra) and his family).
While this was not practiced by the companions and family of the prophet peace be upon him.
Whereas throughout the quran u read that u cannot call upon anyone but allah.
Shiaism is not merely a political difference but a theological difference as well.
@@fogshadow9112 If we look at history, we see that you rafidah are at the forefront of oppression against Muslims. It was Ibn al-Alqami the rafidhi who was working for the abbasids in Baghdad but secretly inviting the mongols to invade, which resulted in millions of Muslims being kiIIed and Baghdad being destroyed. Then if we look at today, it was the rafidah that asked America to invade Iraq which resulted again in about a million Muslims being kiIIed. America replaced saddam with an extremist rafidhi government that went around killing Sunnis just for having the names of the sahaba. The crimes of American funded shia militias in Iraq is well known. This is your history, oppression and treachery, allying with anyone you can against Muslims.
Well Ali would've still been chastised either way.
Excellent piece of objective information
Very Good Depiction Of The Events. Well Done.
Curse on the enemies of prophet Muhammad (pbuh) and the enemies of his family(as)
Cursing sahaba is wrong, brother
@@mohamudabdisalaan6155it is what it is, why is it wrong? Muawiyah was fighting ali ra and his son yazid killed hussein, it happened. Uthman secure the umayyad positions in the government while he was ruling
@@Bosbay6902
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم.
تِلْكَ أُمَّةٌ قَدْ خَلَتْ ۖ لَهَا مَا كَسَبَتْ وَلَكُم مَّا كَسَبْتُمْ ۖ وَلَا تُسْأَلُونَ عَمَّا كَانُوا يَعْمَلُونَ.
@@mohamudabdisalaan6155he never said sahaba, he said the enemies of the prophet and his family, are you saying that the sahaba are the enemies of the prophet?
@@Bosbay6902don’t you see that the Shia are the ones who started the fitnah they killed uthman even while Ali was protecting him
Thank you for the marvelous narration. I couldn't agree more with the content of this nicely and neatly made video. Nevertheless, it's worth mentioning , as a sunni muslim myself, that the vast majority of sunnies prefer Ali to Muaawya. They are even incomparable from religious ranking point of view favouring Ali of course. The sunni public and commoners, at the time , subdued to Mouawya for the greater good of the Islamic dynasty rather than a matter of personal preference since he had the upper hand and he hadn't challenged the Islamic doctrine found by the prophet , neither did Ali of course, plus not wasting human resources and man power on interior conflict. The way we approach this dispute is that this is entirely political not religious. It's safe to say that Sunnis are pro-Ali and would stand by Ali by basic sunni islamic teachings. However, one way or another, nowadays shiite muslims blame the whole issue on Abu Bakr and Omar Ibn Al khattab, long before the assasination of Uthman , as they believe Ali takes precendence in succeding the prophet over the former two. To make the long story short, we ,Sunnis, are by no means antagonists to Ali. To the contrary, if it were left to us , by sunni doctrine, we would have chosen Ali over Muawya. Thank you again for the mind and soul enriching work of history you present to your audience. My favourite channel on any social media platform.
I disagree strongly to your view on Muawiyah and Umayyads.
He was the main person who changed the ruling style, from a type of ruling which chose the ruler based on his merit to a hereditary one.
Not to mention, his and his family's approach towards non Arabs and especially non-Muslims was very controversial and racist at best. Interestingly, the only Umayyad rulers who moved from this approach, which to some extent had its roots in pre-Islamic Arabia, was Umar II, who ironically was poisoned by Umayyads themselves.
The Umayyads used this approach as a way to extort non-Muslims by increasing their Jizya, which made them rich while making the other parts of empire poor. Moreover, they used this extorted money to expand the empire, in order to add more non-Muslim subjects (and making themselves richer), without any consideration towards over-expansion, something that concerned Umar I very much.
Couldn't put it any better, that was a good overview of everything 👍🏻
Well said, an accusation Shias ever so endlessly make that "Sunnis hate Ali", may Allah be pleased with him, and all the companions, including Muawiyah, and may Allah grant them the highest degree in heaven for their great service to Allah and His prophet peace be upon him.
@@Abdulrahman_Hi I've never heard a single Shi'a say that, and I am Shi'a myself
Did they both like to groom and marry child-brides? 😂
It's worth noting that most Sunnis would agree that Ali was in the right. But hindsight is 20/20 as they say. Regardless, it is called a fitnah (tribulation) for a reason.
This utopia era had to be closed one way or the other
And they called muaviye, R A
Thanks for wonderful presentation
Thank you for this I was waiting for it
that hadith of Ammar being killed by a wicked band of men is in Sahih Bukhari which is the most popular sunni book of hadith and this narration has been approved by all
The shia ali, the people of kufa betrayal ali
And they become the khawaraj and killed him
From Some sources that i can trust, i found that,
The group of people who murdered or assassinated Uthman is the same group which assassinated Ali
This was the first major political issue in early islamic conquest, not a religion issue but political one
Yes, Uthman killed him, and they are Ali's killers as well
There goes kings making my day even brighter 😁👍
another great edition k&g never disappoints
Thank you for uploading Such videos
Uthman fought his own clan before with prophet Muhammad ﷺ
before they become Muslims. Moreover, some of the Umayyad governors were appointed before the Caliphate of Uthman so I don't think that he wanted to strengthen his family power depending on his previous deeds.
Well, before omar passed away , he called for the next would be caliph to sack all the appointees in governing yet othman didn't do that , also the corruption of moauya was not new , cuz in the timeline of omar there was an incident were he caught Abu sufian having alot of coins and expensive jewelry when he returned from Syria, then omar called Abu sufian a lier and a thief like his son who stole Muslim wealth in Syria, TBH othman was weak he didn't had the strength, honesty and justice sense as Ali or omar.
@@Requeim4Hope this is a flawed argument because ali ra like usman ra before him had also given his relatives governorship over provinces... bottom line is both were giants among sahaba but didn't possess statesmanship like omar ra
@@Requeim4Hope You're besmirching a companion that the prophet and the angels would blush in his presence.
@@alissa6 well, it's not at all black and white, it's in major grey, also open your mind a little bit and think if othman was that good then why he kept all the corrupts that omar order them to be sacked ? And why at the end most of the sahaba including aisha disagreed with him ?
@@ismail4900 in matter of fact , I have never seen a flawed argument like yours , omar him self ordered that all appointees to be sacked so omar definitely knew they were corrupt and he also called Abu sufian and his son liers and thieves ,so its either you know the truth and omar was an idiot or the fact that he is was right and the umayyads were a mafia
19:54 Good map, many people who make religious maps often ignore Shia minorities in of Turkey and Syria and Sunni minorities in the Balkans for some reason.
U REALLY have balls to do video about this & did't hide the comment section.
The comment section is fine
So interesting to see how these things pan out
awesome episode and great analysis of events
Proud follower of Ahlulbayt and Imam Ali ❤
what do you think of Aisha (RA)? She is ahlul bayt and I heard a lot of shia hate her.
Ali (RA) himself made peace with her and respected her so I just want to see if you guys also follow Ali (RA) in this.
@@temptemp4174 you're not a Sunni.Stop this nonsense.Anyone who says that Hazrat Muawiya(May Allah be pleased with him)was evil is himself an evil person.Hazrat Muawiya did some mistakes but he had good intentions in his heart.He had no grudge against Hazrat Ali (May Allah be pleased with him)
@Munna Mobile in Arabic ahlulbayt are the wives not the cousins.
@Munna Mobile but Quran is in Arabic, you as a non Arab you gonna show me my religion and Ali AS who is more related to me than he ever was to you ?
@@nourerrahmanebrahmia4035 In Arabic Ahlulbayt doesnt mean the wives. It literally means the people of the house.
As someone born and raised in a shia community these videos thought me alot and I could see both perspectives from a neutral point of view. Thank you Kings and generals for another great video
and then you see that the nuetral point is the exact same thing. that proves everything.
Only to realise, the neutral point of view is the Shia point of view. There are no cover ups or illogical explanation for events.
@@mostafahussaini843 correctly said Muawiya was lanati and uthman was also lanati... nepotism they did... from the starting
@@mohammadaatif5222Ali was obviusly unfit for rule. He couldn't even control his own men yet, how was he going to control the entire caliphate. He also recruited the murderers of the third rightly guided caliph, Uthman, into his army, which was already the main reason for the problem between him and Muawiya. Againist to the requests of Muawiyah, he always avoided punishing them. Eventually His death came from them. He was a wonderful warrior but not a good politician.
@@mostafahussaini843 Sunni and Shia are 99% the same , people should focus on that . The childish insulting of dead companions is futile and still fighting over something that happened 1400 years ago is useless . Other then that religiously Sunni and Shia only have minor disagreements despite how big of a deal those in power try to make it . If you are Shia study the works of Sunni if you are Sunni study the works of Shia so that you know the conflict is politically driven
Khalid ibn Al Walid- Fertile Crescent
Amr ibn Al As- Egypt
Saad bin abi Waqqas - Persia
All 3 major Rashidun generals had different preferences of conquest 🌝
Correction: Khalid was also very active in syria, not only the crescent
@@MAJ-zn4dm Most of Syria is part of the Fertile Crescent :D
@@MAJ-zn4dm and also khalid was active in persia too with muthana before sa'ad
@@PlatonicHesaf khalid never step his foot on persian proper, only in iraq ruled by persian
@@asmrnaturecat984 well that's whay i meant to be honest because this 'persia' that I'm saying is persian empire cause the country called iran not persia anymore, but thanks for correcting me
Beyond the shadows of doubt and without any prior religious and historical information, this movie can make the entire picture quite clearer.
May God be pleased with all the companions and forgive them 🙏🏻
رضي الله عن الصحابة الصالحين ولعنة الله على الصحابة الضالمين
Nonsensical, those who opposed the right and created fitna for worldly gains would be punished by hell fire.
Sooo may Allah forgive the killed and the killer ??? Can we say the same thing about the sons of prophet Adam (as) wich are Qabile and Habile ??? This is absolutely ridiculous which shows how fragile the “all the sahaba are awdol” means( all the companions of the prophet are alllll good and are going to heaven”
When the kharijites rebelled against Ali and rebuked him by saying: “authority belongs to God alone and not to you” he refuted them by saying: “These are words of truth intended for falsehood”.
if only people could understand Ali and follow his orders things would have been very good today.
and also No one could beat him in a dual that's why they attacked him from back when he was praying.
True to that
The Main reason as to why Ali faced so Much opposition was that he like the Prophets & Their Successors before him was on a reforming mission & at that point in time in History the General State of the Muslim Community was that it had gotten used to Wrong & corrupted ways in Matters pertaining to religion & worldly life. Here he embarked upon a reforming mission upon assuming the Office - which was his duty & this upset the status quo as well as vested interests because it upset a unity based on falsehood. This led to so much conflict & rebellion resulting in splitting of families with brothers choosing differing sides like for instance the 2 sons of Khalid-ibn-al-Waleed. Abd-ul-Rahman-ibn-Khalid-bin-Walid on Muawiyas Side & Al-Muhajir-ibn-Khalid-bin-Waleed on Alis Side - Brother fought brother. If he(Ali) Wanted he could have spared all this bloodshed by compromising & continuing with the corrupt ways of his predecessors, yet he gave importance to his duty no matter the cost. Hence Ali Earned such a Lofty Status on Facing such adversity in the pursuit of his duties.
….very good how exactly? Also he was prty old at the time, being old and a veteran of many wars isnt very good fitness wise
@@grief6052 that is good for your physical health. What do you mean
@@greeninja2728 veterans of wars especially at the time always suffered from muscle pains, scars that didn’t heal correctly, joint problems from being hit constantly, its actually very well documented how as time went on generals began to fight less and less if they were planning for big conquests because the scars and muscle damage and even bone damage pile up overtime, you dont come out of a fight stronger physically and in your old age it really shows
These guys weren’t on treadmills and sophisticated equipment nor did they have a balanced athlete’s diet lol
Dear . Well gathered History Data . Neutral & factual .upsetting but getting into core .
Hye there Admin. Really love this video. It makes me more understand who and what happened during the battle. Is there a sequel for this video?
Unfortunately, those who succeeded to the Caliphate after the first four Caliphs were greatly lacking in character and leadership qualities. They did not have the moral or spiritual calibre one would expect of Muslim leadership. They were not able to wear down the pagan attitudes and habits of their tribes. None of the Umayyad and the 'Abbasid Caliphs, with the solitary exception of 'Umar ibn 'Abdul Aziz came fully up to the standard of Islam.
True, that was prophesied by Muhammad PBUH
So true
That’s what Umar II is considered the 6th rightly guided caliph
@@yehyaali4701 Umar ibn Abdulaziz is the 6th, because the 6 months that Hasan RA ruled are included in the Hadith that states that the Rashidun Caliphate would last 30 years
That’s not true Sulayman bin abdul Malik was actually like Umar II
There is no doubt among all Muslims that in all the battles Ali was on the path of truth and had the blessings of Prophet Muhammad PBUH.
This guy says we support Muayah as Sunnis?!?!?!!? like what on God's name?!?!?! am Sunni and we all support Ali. it is a lie that we stand with Muayah
@@oneeyed1055 fr, i was questioning my own beliefs for a second lol.
@@oneeyed1055 this person seems to not realize we sunnis literally call Ali (RA) the final rightly guided caliph.
Mua'wiah (RA) is called the first ummayyad caliph.
we still respect Mua'wiah (RA) but understand who was the better leader.
@@resentfuldragon yep
@@tranium67 don't take history from people who barely know their own fathers ( meaning they don't know their roots or they don't have fathers). let alone their knowledge on people who know their roots , religion..etc ( muslims ).
This was a great video! You should do more videos on ancient India!
Thanks for the video 👍🏻
Amazing historical video
I would like to suggest to put the Command and Conquer Generals GLA soundtrack in your videos
It was fully accepted by the scholars of Ahlus Sunnah that in the battles between Hz. Ali KW and Muawiya R.A , it was Ali R.A who was right and the truth was always with him.
Incredible how you remain unbiased regarding such a divisive topic, no one is complaining in the comments this is amazing
Best channel learned many things as a Sunni Muslim. Thank you
Read your history
ive been a muslim for over 20 years and my first time understanding these
The content was awesome as usual.But a bit correction expected to be made,the fellow of Sunni Islam strongly believe that Muawiyah's (ra.) way of ruling was 'Ijtehadi' (understandingly) wrong untill his ruling.
This is just Wahabi doctrine about praising cursed Muawiah &calling him a Mijtahid .
Wow so leading muslims into an all out war on the righteous caliphate and the cousin of the prophet and his son in law and killing tens of thousands of muslims is just a misunderstanding and ijtehad ??? You really need to check your religion man
Kudos to k&g man this is a very sensitive issue among muslim many scholars here refrain from discussing this issue but you described this perfectly and your research is amazing!
Many historical inaccuracies in this video. Biggest one which I'll correct is that Caliph Hassan ibn Ali didn't give power to Amir Muawiyah due to any kind or pressure or threat, rather he did it willingly from a standpoint of utmost magnanimity and asceticism. He gives a beffiting response to the propoganda in his own striking words:
"Al-Hasan said: “The skulls of the Arabs were in my hands, they would make peace with whom I make peace and they would fight whom I fight, I left it all to seek the face of God and to stop bloodshed among Muslims .” [Source: al-Baladhuri in Ansab al-Ashraf 3/49]
Wrong. Muawiya was a power hungry dog, and he would have started a war to get the Calipha. Lanatullah alayhi.
Excellent correction. Al Hasan and Muawiyah came to a mutual agreement. Hasan was not pressured, but rather feared that bloodshed would increase and so deemed it would be better if Muawiyah was to be negotiated with. Hasan would rule the caliphate and then Muawiyah would rule after him
They did mention this in their video on the Shia-Sunni split, where they also covered the Battle of Karbala in greater detail.
Yes, but you didn't mention what Muwaiya did, after the agreement and he become Caliphate, Muwiya said: Hasan Ibn Ali's agreement is under my foot! Muwiya is simply a non-religious and hypocrite person part of the agreement was that not to allow his son to become caliphate, but in reality he gave it to his son Yazeed ibn Muwaiya, this is part of Muwiya's dirty plan
Your so called correction is literally just a sunni biased perspective. Let neutrals tell history without being tainted by personal beliefs. The sunni narrative is NOT the only point of view that deserves to be told.
Great videos really interesting.
Great video!
14:39 "these al khawarij, or kharijites as they would later be called"
...al khawarij is the arabic name and kharijites is in english, so it's just a translation, not something they were "later called."
@@ChevyChase301 the arabic word is still used now by Muslims when they mention this group, its only a tiny group of western orientalists who use this word "kharijites", it isn't and was never a common way to refer to the khawarij.
@@ath_thabaat as a Arab from Egypt you are correct
@@ChevyChase301 you can't just change things, or rename the things from far land culture and it's linguistics
Even after this day n age, majority says khawarij
Mola Ali is lion of Allah being Sunni my ultimate devotion and support for Mola Ali A.S.
One thing you forgot to mention, which is why the arbitration failed. After the verdict would be issued, both arbiters were supposed, on the behalf of their followers, to remove their leaders (ali and muawiyya ) from power and give the council of shura, the companions and leaders, the right to decide the new caliph. Musa started first, removing ali, but then amr did not, and demanded that the council accept muawiyya thus as the new caliph, even though by most sources muawiyya had not openly ordered anything similar, which is why ali left. Would have been nice also if you spoke a bit about the other factions (mu'tazila and murjia) because of their important role later.
I knew there was a mistake, studying Ali’s life I know how much of a righteous man he was and there is no way he refused to let go of his power just because he wanted to stay in power
Amr ibn as was sahabi which we respect but here he was the traitor as he talk with musa that we both will give athority to shura after that musa believe amr and after this you know litrally betrayed him and you can clearly see when muawiya amr ibne as the governor of egypt well prophet stated all sahabi the fitna of wealth come to you so ask allah for forgiveness
Ali was obviusly unfit for rule. He couldn't even control his own men yet, how was he going to control the entire caliphate. He also recruited the murderers of the third rightly guided caliph, Uthman, into his army, which was already the main reason for the problem between him and Muawiya. Againist to the requests of Muawiyah, he always avoided punishing them. Eventually His death came from them. He was a wonderful warrior but not a good politician.
@@williamrobert9898 Ali was chosen by Muslims after Usman as a caliph. Whereas Muawiya was just a powerthirsty governor who wanted to rule, used religion and revenge of Usman's death as a pretext and caused chaos in the Muslim world. If bringing justice to Usman was his priority, why didn't he punish his murderers after he got power?
@@ZahraAli-ev6hd Are you sure he didn't? I could've sworn K&G mentioned that Muawiya actually started many campaigns against them to the point where they actually fled westwards towards the land of the Maghreb
*For all who leaf through the comments, health to you and your loved ones.💖💖💖💖💖💖*
a very good report indeed.
We are not shia, we are not sunni. WE ARE MUSLIMS !!! Allah is great
Tell Pakistan to befriend Iran, then.
@@budakbaongsiah Iran had ties with India due to Pakistan's (unfortunate) decision to ally with the US, however I'm hopeful that Pakistani relations with Iran will improve now that Pakistan has left the US bloc
@@ibadurrehman1210
Oh so it's USA's fault that most Islamic countries are not friendly with Iran and not themselves? Are muslim countries so inept that the USA can just swoop in like the colonizers of old?
@@budakbaongsiah you misunderstood my point, what I'm trying to say is that Muslim countries made unfortunate choices and created conflict within themselves
A united peoples, kingdom or religion goes on a winning streak, gains power and riches, then fragments into civil war. Crazy how this repeats time and time again. The riches of an after life are reward enough for the poor but not those who seek power in the here and now.
It’s impossible to avoid the riches of this world if you want to sustain a nation/ empire for the longevity
there are some bigs point events missing in this video
Laylat al-Harir :
Laylat al-Harir was a rough night during the battle of Siffin. The armies of Imam Ali (a) and Mu'waiya fought in that night and many soldiers of both sides were killed. According to al-Minqari, in that night, there was no sound heard except the sound of hitting the swords which was more terrifying in the hearts of men than the sound of thunder or horrifying fall of mountains.[1] Ibn Miskawayh described that night, "They fought in that night, so hard that spears broke and no arrow was left in quivers and then they began fighting with swords."[2] In Laylat al-Harir, the soldiers of Imam Ali (a) were close to victory, until Ash'ath rose among al-Kindis, gave a sermon and with a peace-making tone, asked for stopping more bloodshed. According to hadiths, as soon as Mu'awiya was informed about the sermon of Ash'ath, ordered to put the copies of the Qur'an on the spears.[3]
Arbitration :
hen the army of Mu'awiya was about to be defeated because of the attacks made by Malik al-Ashtar, Mu'awiya asked 'Amr b. al-'As for advice.[4] By the suggestion of 'Amr b. al-'As and the order of Mu'awiya, people of Syria put volumes of the Qur'an on their spears, shouting: "O' people of Iraq! Let God be the arbiter between us". According to some accounts, they also shouted: "O' Arab people! Think about your women and daughters. If you die, who is going to fight the Romans, Turks and the Persians?"[5] They thereby asked for ending the war. Imam Ali (a) ordered his army to continue the war, but most people in his army wanted to accept the arbitration. Thus Imam Ali (a) had to accept the arbitration.[6]
Imam Ali (a) proposed Abd Allah b. Abbas or Malik al-Ashtar as his arbiter, and proposed Ahnaf b. Qays as a second or third arbiter, but some people did not accept his suggestions, and imposed Abu Musa al-Ash'ari to Imam Ali (a) as an arbiter. And people of Syria elected 'Amr b. al-'As as their representative for arbitration.[7]
The two arbiters decided that 'Amr b. al-'As announces the removal of Mu'awiya from power, and Abu Musa al-Ash'ari announces the removal of Ali b. Abi Talib (a) from power, leaving the election of the Caliph to a council. 'Amr b. al-'As asked Abu Musa to announce the result of the arbitration ahead of him. Thus Abu Musa al-Ash'ari announced the removal of Imam Ali (a) from power, but when it came to 'Amr b. al-'As, instead of announcing the removal of Mu'awiya from power, he confirmed the dismissal of Imam Ali (a) by Abu Musa, and appointed Mu'awiya as the Caliph. After this, there was a quarrel between these two arbiters and they cursed each other.[8]
1.Ibn Muzāḥim, Waqʿat ṣiffīn, p. 475.
2.Ibn Miskawayh, Tajārub al-umam, vol. 1, p. 535.
3.Ibn Muzāḥim, Waqʿat ṣiffīn, p. 480-481; Dīnawarī, al-Akhbār al-ṭiwāl, p. 188-189.
4.Ibn Abī l-Ḥadīd, Sharḥ nahj al-balāgha, vol. 2, p. 210.
5.Ibn Muzāḥim, Waqʿat ṣiffīn, p. 478.
6.Ibn Muzāḥim, Waqʿat ṣiffīn, p. 490.
7.Ibn Aʿtham, al-Futūḥ, vol. 4, p. 197-198.
8.Ibn Muzāḥim, Waqʿat ṣiffīn, p. 545.
From what I have learnt from this videos on early Islamic history and it culture it was quite impressive and well learned and part of where knowledge on stargazing and medicine and maths just to name a few of things we whole world should recognise
Thank God, it is a big honor and pride that I am a Shia Muslim, a follower of Imam Ali (p.b.u.h) the real and the legitimate successor of prophet Muhammad (p.b.u.h), and not the hijacked powers and coup leaders. And plus that I am from decedent of Imam Ali through his som Imam Hussein (p.b.u.h)
The people of kufa are the only who killed ali
20:18 why didn't you mention that the sunnah believes that Ali is better than Muawiyah?
as if shia choose Ali and sunnah choose muawyah
Sunnah is obeying the prophet and Quran
sunnah is the mainstream Islam
evin Ali was a sunni
Quran is hate mongering cult.
The way you explain the Kharajite movement makes it sound like something a modern intelligence agency would think up to annoy an enemy state. Not that I'm necessarily arguing with that idea.
It feels like something out of Assassin's Creed franchise
That's exactly what modern intelligence services are doing.
@@kgptzac yeah but the people depicted in the first AC game were devotees of Ali a.s
Amazing video
As A Muslim, I would say my heartfelt farewell to Rashidun Caliphate, Most Just and rightful Islamic Caliphate ever.
Thank for your countless sacrifices and preaching for spreading Islam ❤☪️ ❤ around the world.
It's so much interesting to learn about Sunni and Shia 💕💕
This somewhat reminds me of the civil war between Caesar and the Senate. It is miraculous that the Sassanids and Byzantines didn't make any gains during this civil war, or that the Gauls didn't rise up when the Romans were going at each other
Caliphate were too powerful to conquared and importantly Caliphate army already destroyed the backbone of both sassanids and Byzantines
Sassanids no longer existed and the romans were still reeling from the conquest
The Romans tried and gathered an army, but Mu’awiyah wrote them a letter saying he would reconcile with Ali and unite against them if they tried to invade, at that point the Romans got scared and abandoned their plan
Constans II reclaimed armenia for a while and forced mauwiyah for tribute but he was just fresh out from his defeat at mast , Constans Ii was smart emperor and knew his limits so he didn't push for more , he mostly used the respite to focus on the west defeated the Slavic draguvites and creating the first themes
Pff
I love your channel, but your this video is not kinda neutral, as you mentioned in this video that "ACCORDING TO PRO ALI ACCOUNTS : Ammar would be killed by band of wicked men" i dont know from where you get the source however this narration of prophet is mentioned in Sahih Muslim 2916, Jami tirmidhi 3800 and almost all the 6 authentic sunni hadith books. It is a very popular and widely narratrd hadith so i dont get it that why did you mentioned "pro ali accounts".
The pro ali accounts are correct that is why. I am not a shia but ali should’ve been on the throne and the fitna was only a bad thing
Excellent video 📹
'DESTINY IS ALL'
🐫 🐪 🐫 🐪 🐫 🐪
This video is more informative and authentic than many so-called scholars of Islam lectures on these topics.
The bottom line is that Ali was a righteous man, elected by the general public, and was on the right in all his battle. Time has proved this again and again.
Ali should have accepted the arbitration result instead of backing off
@@MohamedMohamed-ws7mq it was obvious that it would lead to the oppression of muslims by muawiya. Why would he ever accept such a deal
This channel is such a chugtai khanate 👍🏽