Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.
Karen Read jury unable to reach verdict in murder trial
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 июн 2024
- Read is accused of ramming her police officer boyfriend with her SUV and leaving him on the ground to die during a snowstorm. Read denies the allegations and claims she was framed by police.
Subscribe to ABC News on RUclips: abcnews.visitl...
ABC News Digital is your daily source of breaking national and world news, exclusive interviews and 24/7 live streaming coverage.
Download the ABC News app for the latest headlines and alerts: abcnews.go.com...
Watch 24/7 coverage of breaking news and live events on ABC News Live: • LIVE: Latest News Head...
Watch full episodes of World News Tonight with David Muir here: • ABC World News Tonight...
Read ABC News reports online: abcnews.go.com
ABC News is the home to the #1 evening newscast “World News Tonight” with David Muir, “Good Morning America,” “20/20,” “Nightline,” “This Week” with George Stephanopoulos, “ABC News Live Prime” with Linsey Davis, plus the daily news podcast “Start Here.”
Connect with ABC News on social media:
Facebook: / abcnews
Instagram: / abcnews
TikTok: / abcnews
X: / abc
Threads: www.threads.ne...
LinkedIn: / abcnews
The video of her car showing the taillight proves the police report was false.
Bologna! Broken af
drive.google.com/file/d/1029EJXxlu2mLHoG6HOLRAb76jPv-qlVW/view?usp=drivesdk
100% reasonable doubt. But isn't there a former cop on the jury? No way he doesn't side with law enforcement regardless.
For me it’s not even reasonable doubt. All the evidence shows she’s innocent
Thats a hell of a battle for the cop on the jury to defend LE. Missing reports, a completely botched investigation, missing chains of custody for evidence, no search reports, manipulated video evidence, not writing down an alleged confession and not mentioning the confession until the day of trial. The horrifying text messages from the investigator. The accident guy not understanding 5th grade basic physics. There's no way he is defending other cops.
@@stacyeandrew2 I haven't followed this super close for quite some time, but i will guarantee an area like this wont have the greatest investigative capabilities. Its not a huge metro area with world class investigators so I can easily see there being issues with paperwork, dates, evidence, basically all the small stuff that you don't think about unless you have been in this sort of trial. That said its absurd to believe that every single person involved immediately (or very soon after emergency call) came to the realization that karen has to be framed for this, that even though they don't what exactly happened she needs to be framed. I think this story has become somewhat twisted as channels have zeroed in that coverage pro-karen yields better results... So i dont think we get a truly square assessment. Its way too complicated for all of these people to be instantly on the same page, and one never decide to be honest. The simplest circumstance is almost always the factual circumstance. The times that the simplest isnt correct its nowhere near this convoluted, and involved with so many people. I think you have to be a little thick to believe the defense story, but i think small pieces may allow reasonable doubt...
Who is the bootlicker?
Exactly 💯
I listened to entire trial. Jury should not be pressured. If I would on jury I would not budge. Karen is innocent.
I would absolutely not budge either. I would not either. I wouldn’t absolutely not.
NOT GUILTY!
Who’s going to prison for the victim? All he’s friends and all the cops?
“All his friends”. Yes, they should be
Some cases go unsolved. Unfortunately. Nobody can prove how he actually died. So nobody goes to prison. But I think that’s better than an innocent person going to prison.
We've investigated ourselves and found no wrongdoing
When the commercials are longer than the news video 🤦🏻♀️
RUclips premium is the best 15 month I've ever spent!! I gave up my Netflix for premium 😮😂😂
Innocent. Clear reasonable doubt. Period
87 percent think Karen reed is not guilty.
Anybody with a molecule of a brain knows Karen is innocent.
She's not innocent of being a terrible arrogant human.
Is this Karen lol
Karen should have been more humble and less arrogant. Karen Reed was more concerned about fame smirking and showing no respect in court for the process or John's family and friends.
If the cops, their family, prosecutors and judge all work to create and support a completely unbelievable narrative to lock you up for life, you'll have trouble respecting anyone other than your lawyers!
But you can’t think it’s okay to convict a person based on not liking the way they smile?
She like’s the attention , because she’s to old to find another boyfriend , she’s controlling and jealous. No man is going to like her behavior
@dontmindme633 sounds like at least 1 juror thinks it's ok and that's scary because we know the prosecution didn't even prove how the man died, let alone who did it.
This wasn’t a difficult trial, so much doubt it’s ridiculous. An easy not guilty
Should be guilty
Is guilty
She's guilty and needs to be held accountable
You’re not very smart are you ?
@@laceywhite4380I can only hope the people with this conviction didn’t actually watch the trial, maybe saw some news stories, and don’t know the facts. Based on my little knowledge of the case I assumed she accidentally hit him. Then I watched the trial. This case should have been declared a mistrial by the judge.
I completely agree. All the supposed cover up doesn't exist. She's guilty and she doesn't care she killed a man.
Karen Reed is an absolute narcissist! Just watch her behavior in court, out of court, and on her recordings played in court. She accused John of cheating when she was the cheater, classic narcissistic behavior.
She may be the devil....but doesn't change the fact that there is reasonable doubt so it's not guilty. That's the law. How it should work. But this judge does whatever she wants.
Being a narcissist doesn't make you a murderer. So much reasonable doubt it's absolutely insane!!!
Very true
@@jlow2920 the jury felt differently and they have my respect because that's the law.
She is a narc for sure. The confidence people speak of regarding Karen is actually arrogance. She didn’t help herself :/ I don’t see the evidence proving she did it though.
Hoping Hollywood doesn't make a movie of this trial maybe she's using this to be a star and pay this lawyer
Maybe who's using this to be a star? I know you don't think the accused is the problem.
NOT GUILTY!!!!!!!!
Falsely accused victims saved by high-priced lawyers- OJ, Kevin Spacey, and Karen Read.
Jury didn’t want to comeback 😂
Guilty.
This will be hung and will not be set for trial again. hung or guilty the prosecution is happy with either.....
Police would do anything to save one of there own , Framing is possible .
Karen's guilty if hung jury she will be retried
This is so unbelievable that the Canton Police Department and #MassStatePolice could do this to #KarenRead
police lied
The juries lunch is apparently more important.. Wow😮..Lunch?!!?
Love Brian!
Guilty
Unschuldig. 🇩🇪
Talking abt a woman's freedom..reporter doesn't wanna break July 4th. Hey Brian..what's the photo behind your rubbish report
That's ashamed that jury are a wrong picked the jury should be out of the town Read lives probably they are friends it is all the evidence this is a passion crime
The investigation was so messy it’s giving reasonable doubt. There’s no way they can find her guilty. That would be unjust.
Guilty!!!!!!
Def a hung jury ..
He doesn't have the hung⛓️ jury data ...why not, more important for yr head in here than 2 sec Google Mr DEI reporting??
The mcalberts got to someone.
NBC 10 BOSTON has reports on Trooper Proctor !! **
She did it
No she didn't
She didn't do what they said. They never proved that Mr. O'Keefe was struck by a motor vehicle...because he wasn't. Not Guilty.
There is definitely reasonable doubt. Clear doubt. Can't convict a person on how we feel or worse, based on our own thoughts of what we think maybe hhappened.
Are you 100000% sure
Karen Reed should not be able to profit from her arrogance and smug persona.
100 percent a coverup …
Yooo
I think the boy did it
Guilty
the victim was not struck by a motor vehicle. That, very important detail, was never proven.
Yes, the cops he was with, are. Ur right
@NalaRichenbach the fragments of plastic embedded in the victims clothing says otherwise
@@jediknight4316 OH, You mean the fragments those dirty cops planted on the victim, yet he received no broken arm. How is that possible...not even a bruise. It defies physics. HELLO...Is there anybody out there? Are you aware of physics?
@@NalaRichenbach HELLO! 10-2 GUILTY!!!!!