Canadian Army - Leopard 2A4M CAN Main Battle Tanks Live Firing + On The Move [720p]

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 11 дек 2024

Комментарии • 29

  • @inclusivemodeldesigns16
    @inclusivemodeldesigns16 5 лет назад +2

    Great video! Love building Canadian Armour!

  • @brentwalker5952
    @brentwalker5952 7 лет назад +3

    THE WHIPS!! MAN!! THE WHIPS!!! LOVE THEM ELECTRIFYING RADIO RODS!!

    • @hafidfarah1410
      @hafidfarah1410 6 лет назад

      brent walker why doesn’t Canada use tha abram

    • @sincereeastman6972
      @sincereeastman6972 6 лет назад

      because if damaged we have to return them to the US, and that'll be a lot of wasted money. With a Leopard 2 its simple maintenance

  • @danielbeaudin7888
    @danielbeaudin7888 6 лет назад +6

    german tanks always the best!

    • @Loup-mx7yt
      @Loup-mx7yt 5 лет назад

      daniel beaudin actually a Canadian modification but ok

    • @Future183
      @Future183 3 года назад +1

      @@Loup-mx7yt still german lol

    • @staceytowers9056
      @staceytowers9056 2 года назад

      Hitler engineering

  • @TONSBERG100
    @TONSBERG100 9 лет назад +2

    Were these tanks bought new or used ?

    • @cannack
      @cannack 9 лет назад +7

      +ERIK SAGER used but were heavily upgraded, thermal sights, fire control systems, armor mostly replaced by composites, gps, coms updated, engine, track, belly armor added, soo many things

    • @TONSBERG100
      @TONSBERG100 9 лет назад +2

      +๖ۣۜCOFFEbiscuit๖ۣۜ 1 Thankx. Leopard was a good choice.

    • @cannack
      @cannack 9 лет назад +2

      ERIK SAGER it was, more suited for canadas environment, and we were getting the stryker MGS but the military realized the need for tank in afganistan and bought over 100 leopard 2s to replace those leopard 1s

    • @jesusf.2600
      @jesusf.2600 6 лет назад

      can nack SIDE ARMOR IN BOTH CHASISVAN TURRET AS WELL AS BACKNOF TYE TURRET ADITIONAL ARMOR + CAGE ARMOR TO PROTECT AGAINST RPG-7 ATTACKS.

    • @99hockeynhl
      @99hockeynhl 5 лет назад

      @@jesusf.2600 ? look at the tanks in Afghanistan, they had those lol. They dont put all the equitment on in most exercises as it adds weight. im surprised they even have that extra armour CAN upgrade lol.

  • @jennifergirten9334
    @jennifergirten9334 6 лет назад

    why didnt canada make there own tank why did thay need to buy one from germany

    • @inclusivemodeldesigns16
      @inclusivemodeldesigns16 5 лет назад +6

      Why reinvent the wheel?

    • @Loup-mx7yt
      @Loup-mx7yt 5 лет назад +2

      Jennifer Girten it cost less money. Also these tanks are Canadian modification (turret is more armored and looks way different than a regular 2a4)

    • @SkyKing5634
      @SkyKing5634 3 года назад

      Cause or government wouldn't allow it and it would be Cheever just to buy

    • @Future183
      @Future183 3 года назад

      whats the problem to buy leopard cause its german?? is that what u wanted to say?

  • @cloudshelf9052
    @cloudshelf9052 8 лет назад +2

    This comment makes 6 comments on this video :3

  • @АлександрКостин-б5д

    Ахуенный танк)))))

  • @psilos197
    @psilos197 11 лет назад

    watch?v=vMtwpS9ah-U for real action!!!

  • @staceytowers9056
    @staceytowers9056 2 года назад +2

    That should be the American M1 Abrams not German Leopard.

    • @jadenlarson9431
      @jadenlarson9431 Год назад +6

      Canada looked at the abrams but decided to go with the leopard because it fit our needs better. The US looked at buying the leopards aswell before ultimately going with an in house design

    • @tobybeggs8676
      @tobybeggs8676 9 месяцев назад

      @@jadenlarson9431the only need it fit was costs

    • @danilocabaiii6868
      @danilocabaiii6868 5 месяцев назад

      The heck you mean?

    • @yeetuscleetus3833
      @yeetuscleetus3833 4 месяца назад

      Whos to say what should and shouldnt be, we use each others systems anyway like canadian LAVs in american service today