I think reducing morality to a single objective, like minimising pain and suffering, oversimplifies the concept. Morality can be highly personal, individualistic and context driven. It fails to account for the complexities where morality cannot take a "logical" side. For example, consider a husband who kills a criminal to prevent the murder of his wife. According to the objective stated above, it might not be ideal to kill the criminal, as this causes pain and suffering for the criminal and his loved ones. Actions that may seem morally questionable (like taking a life) can be seen differently depending on the context and intentions behind them. Minimising pain and suffering can be one of the guidelines but morality’s depth and flexibility can't be fully captured by a single principle. - A huge fan of Anantharaman's Nissaram ♥
🛑 When we first hear his points, it seems like he is right, but this is a mind trap. 📌 His main argument in the video is that morality from the past doesn’t fit the present world, and this is why he rejects morality based on religious texts. However, many of the examples he uses involve moral standards created by humans, not divine ones. I agree with him that human-fixed morality has limitations, but divine morality does not. ✨ For example, in this argument, I focused on morality rooted in Islam’s teachings, which are universal and timeless, crafted to remain relevant throughout all eras. 💡 Let’s refute some part of his arguments with some examples: 1. Islam allows women to pursue education while promoting modesty through guidelines on dress codes, like not wearing shorts or bikinis. This balance ensures both empowerment and societal respect. 2.Islam prohibits alcohol but promotes healthy alternatives. The prohibition addresses universal harms like addiction while supporting individual and community well-being. 3. Islam forbids interest (riba) but promotes fair financial practices like trade and profit-sharing, ensuring justice in economic dealings. 🤔 Keep this in mind: The speaker, being an atheist, uses platforms like TEDx to promote his ideas. I personally follow his channel Nissaram and have learned a lot, but as an educated individual, I always apply critical thinking. You, the audience, should do the same-never accept ideas blindly; think and analyze. 📩 If you'd like to discuss further, feel free to reach out privately. ✅ Conclusion: Islam’s teachings offer a moral framework that is logical, universally applicable, and consistently relevant, making divine morality superior to human-fixed standards.
As a ' Nissaram' fan I felt that, this ted talk was like a summary of his some videos on Nissaram 😊 Anyway I luv it❤ Good presentation ❤🔥 Hats off for choosing this complex topic 🙌
Now, if only there were a definitive way to measure 'short' and 'long term,' I could finally start my life of 'short-term pain and suffering'. Why morality is even a necessity? Be useful to yourself and others. You are good to go.
Even though the speech was on "question morality" the large part of a speech was a justificaiton attempt - trying to build logical arguments to support whatever the today's world wants to do. (It just happened thorugh examples - which definelty will have a better appeal from the audience (which do not prove those are right) as they are waiting for someone to give more reasons to support whatever they are doing or want to do). There are a lot of open points and unclosed loops throughout the speech, which genuine and curious viewers should explore through reading. Specifically, some crucial discussions on topics like abortion was simplified to a three sentence argument, without even presenting the complexities and multi dimensional perspectives in it. The father is thrashing her daughter - the pain can't go away because it is physical. So was it right if the father was just mentally hurting her with words? She can change her belief systems to he doesn't matter and decide to ignore him. And the base of arguments which presented based on long term cessation of pain/suffering, which is further based on "desirability" is also just one way of arguing, and which may not be the best of the ways. Because desirability is first and foremost, in the way described in the speech, a selfish rooted and self centered outlook. (A person can take up pain to save someone else from pain, even when the person 1 doesn't want that. That means his actual desire is not to cease the pain but to do something higher like love the other person, or care the other person. Which further means the undesirability of pain alone cannot set the base for moral arguments in a way.)
His way of Speaking. ......❤️🔥 iam a big fan of Nissaram✨
നിനക്കു സാൽമൺ ഫിഷിന്റെ history അറിയാമോ? 😊
@@GuhannnnSalmon < Sraavu 🫰🏻
😂🔥@@Guhannnn
Quality person sharing Quality content ❤
💯
Nissaram ❤
മലയാളികൾ ഉണ്ടോ ഇവിടെ 🔥
I think reducing morality to a single objective, like minimising pain and suffering, oversimplifies the concept. Morality can be highly personal, individualistic and context driven. It fails to account for the complexities where morality cannot take a "logical" side.
For example, consider a husband who kills a criminal to prevent the murder of his wife. According to the objective stated above, it might not be ideal to kill the criminal, as this causes pain and suffering for the criminal and his loved ones.
Actions that may seem morally questionable (like taking a life) can be seen differently depending on the context and intentions behind them.
Minimising pain and suffering can be one of the guidelines but morality’s depth and flexibility can't be fully captured by a single principle.
- A huge fan of Anantharaman's Nissaram ♥
🛑 When we first hear his points, it seems like he is right, but this is a mind trap.
📌 His main argument in the video is that morality from the past doesn’t fit the present world, and this is why he rejects morality based on religious texts. However, many of the examples he uses involve moral standards created by humans, not divine ones. I agree with him that human-fixed morality has limitations, but divine morality does not.
✨ For example, in this argument, I focused on morality rooted in Islam’s teachings, which are universal and timeless, crafted to remain relevant throughout all eras.
💡 Let’s refute some part of his arguments with some examples:
1. Islam allows women to pursue education while promoting modesty through guidelines on dress codes, like not wearing shorts or bikinis. This balance ensures both empowerment and societal respect.
2.Islam prohibits alcohol but promotes healthy alternatives. The prohibition addresses universal harms like addiction while supporting individual and community well-being.
3. Islam forbids interest (riba) but promotes fair financial practices like trade and profit-sharing, ensuring justice in economic dealings.
🤔 Keep this in mind: The speaker, being an atheist, uses platforms like TEDx to promote his ideas. I personally follow his channel Nissaram and have learned a lot, but as an educated individual, I always apply critical thinking. You, the audience, should do the same-never accept ideas blindly; think and analyze.
📩 If you'd like to discuss further, feel free to reach out privately.
✅ Conclusion: Islam’s teachings offer a moral framework that is logical, universally applicable, and consistently relevant, making divine morality superior to human-fixed standards.
This man make me fall in love with science ❤ Such a person who always delivers quality contents
"Nissaram" അത്ര നിസാരമല്ല ❤
Role model for a reason! In awe for more than a decade💎. Good work!!! Proud of you!
THIS IS THE KINDA CONTENT I PAY MY INTERNET BILLS FOR ‼️‼️‼️
As a ' Nissaram' fan I felt that, this ted talk was like a summary of his some videos on Nissaram 😊
Anyway I luv it❤
Good presentation ❤🔥
Hats off for choosing this complex topic 🙌
ഇവൻ ചെറിയ പുള്ളി എല്ലാ ,, True Genius,A prodigy,thank u universe & Ted X CUSAT fr giving me a chance to spend some Quality time with Ananthu broii ❤
"Should be to reduce over all long term pain and sufferings " nissaram❣️
This guy could handle anything below sky as easy as his channel's name 'NISSARAM'❤️
Anatharaman 💎
Now, if only there were a definitive way to measure 'short' and 'long term,' I could finally start my life of 'short-term pain and suffering'.
Why morality is even a necessity?
Be useful to yourself and others. You are good to go.
Proud to be a Nisaram follower
Dude... i hope you will always be safe. We need lots of ppl like you❤
Love this guy💜
Anantharaman ❤️💯😽
Full power speech🎉
Awesome one, sharing
Wonderful
Huge fan of nissaram and his presentation.. 🥰😍
Simply amazing! This will definitely stick with me and hope this reaches many more people 😌
Appupan and the boys ❤️🔥
Oh man feeling very glad to see you on this platform ❤
Here science meets humanity❤
Quality content 🔥
Best teacher 🔥🔥
❤ love the way he explains
Appuppante kochumon 💌
Clinjoooooooo 🔥
Amazing content! 🔥
Superb Anandhu
Anantharaman fan❤
Truly a moral masterpiece ❤️🔥
anantharaman's laws of morality 🔥
Way of speaking 🔥😍
Even though the speech was on "question morality" the large part of a speech was a justificaiton attempt - trying to build logical arguments to support whatever the today's world wants to do. (It just happened thorugh examples - which definelty will have a better appeal from the audience (which do not prove those are right) as they are waiting for someone to give more reasons to support whatever they are doing or want to do). There are a lot of open points and unclosed loops throughout the speech, which genuine and curious viewers should explore through reading. Specifically, some crucial discussions on topics like abortion was simplified to a three sentence argument, without even presenting the complexities and multi dimensional perspectives in it. The father is thrashing her daughter - the pain can't go away because it is physical. So was it right if the father was just mentally hurting her with words? She can change her belief systems to he doesn't matter and decide to ignore him. And the base of arguments which presented based on long term cessation of pain/suffering, which is further based on "desirability" is also just one way of arguing, and which may not be the best of the ways. Because desirability is first and foremost, in the way described in the speech, a selfish rooted and self centered outlook. (A person can take up pain to save someone else from pain, even when the person 1 doesn't want that. That means his actual desire is not to cease the pain but to do something higher like love the other person, or care the other person. Which further means the undesirability of pain alone cannot set the base for moral arguments in a way.)
thats true
Proud of you ❤
Anantharaman🗿💎
Appupan & boys ❤❤
Appopen would be so proud 😢
👏👏👏
✅✅💚
Nissaraam❤❤❤
Big fan ❤,
Nissaram🔥
Nissaram❤
This talk, just nissaram!
Kind of content I'm looking for ❤
I fricking love you man! 🫶
Lovable one ❤❤ fan of anantharaman 🌺
Good one man🔥🔥✌. Big fan of appupan & boys ✌
Kidu speach.. ❤️
Annan🔥🔥🔥👍🏻
Wow❤
Greater observation
Way to go dude... 📈 🔥
Nissaram
Nissaram✨💫
Nissaram 👑
തകിടതോം തകിടതോം ആആആ..💥💥💪🏾💪🏾💪🏾 എടാ അഞ്ച് മണിക്ക് വരാന്നല്ലെ പറഞ്ഞത്
🎉🎉🎉
This man❤❤
Man this guy is awesome,he should start his own movie review channel or an educational channel.
He already has an educational channel nissaram 👍🏻
And a movie review channel also
@@MILI-u7kthat's the joke
Ih Ih Ih. So funny 🥱
@Kevin sarcastic appreciation?
👏👏👏👏 Excellent 🔥🔥
Nisaram 🔥🔥🔥
I LOVE IT !!!!!!!!!!!
❤🔥🔥
Kollam❤️❤️
This guy 🔥🔥🔥🔥
The best ❤
Right thing aat the right time🔥
Yeah ❤
Nisaram❤
Content🔥
Romanjam😮
Ohm... Kaalii❤
nissaram on ted😎😎
Well said bro
pure fire(cant find the symbol)
Here you go🔥🔥🔥
Observation..
We need appuppan's ted talk.
💎
❤️❤️
നിസ്സാരം ❤
TED talk's avastha
nt avstha
❤❤❤
📈📈❤️
Poli🙌
Nissaram fans come on ❤❤❤
❤💯💎
5 seconds in and im already a better person
Omg❤
💎💎
Unfortunately a child doesn't have a voice, if he does then society will mark him as an ingrate.
Can't imagine what's gonna happen after the first 'why' 🤡
Ohh mann you're a gem!!!
Why!?🖤
👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
❤