Russia is not about the West; just yesterday there was no concept of Russia and aircraft manufacturing. Now this is reality, the West is 1 billion, the remaining 7 are not the West.
It doesn't matter if Russia makes better planes than West, if the FAA or Europe doesn't regulate, there's no way to sell to West. And they will never regulate Russian planes.
@@araujofi ….it is not about selling planes in the West ; western civil aviation is clearly ahead of the Russian ones however, this is about self reliance and even if the Russian planes are ten years behind the Western ones, it does not matter as they have a functioning alternative and thus the western sanctions are ineffective .
Yes, this plane is just a way of preserving national sovereignty, given that these are technologies that the West uses as a geopolitical weapon. Underdeveloped countries are subjected to this technological control. But Russia will not be able to do what Airbus did in the 70s, penetrate a market dominated by Boeing for decades.@@abeonthehill166
Operating costs are 14-17% lower. Life cycle cost is 15-20% lower than competitors. Service life before first repair of pump unit is 20,000 hours, before first repair of all SAU-14 units is 40,000 hours.
This engine has (on paper) well designed modern gas generator, but during design the ultimate goal was simplicity, even for the cost of some efficiency. So it should be worse than state of the fart.
A lambda demonstration flight, nothing impressive. Not even a single picture from the cockpit nor the avionics compartments. Russians hiding the thruth as usual.
GOOD PROGRESS, MEANS NEW TECH, MEANS MORE COMPETITION. We need all to compete make safety .NO. 1. BOEING IS NOT SAFE , SO MANY FAULTS ,POOR QUALITY PLANES BY BOEING. BAN BOEING ON SAFETY REASONS
У тебя рак головного мозга, который выел весь твой мозг, сальный савистливый выродок. Тебя еще не кинули в мясной штурм на смерть? Хех, значит скоро отправят.
![Lethal Company Music Video 🎵 "Follow The Orders" [VERSION A]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QeooZB4Z7RA/mqdefault.jpg)
Какой острый взлет, мощные двигатели и при этом вполне экологичные! Браво Россия, многие скептики плачут.
свой самолёт - это прелесть😁!)
Личный самолёт круто! Рад за тебя 😂
Looks good and impressive
Красивый русский самолёт!!! наконец то!
On right path to redemption, Hurrah
Красавец самолёт👍🏻🔥
Красавчик👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
Russia is not about the West; just yesterday there was no concept of Russia and aircraft manufacturing. Now this is reality, the West is 1 billion, the remaining 7 are not the West.
Stop dreaming my friend. Russia is in stone-age regarding civil airliners. Sorry.
@@stabilo3170 A rare Russophobe, looking at a modern plane to say such things about the Stone Age, you have to be an absolute moron.
Красивый и летит - легко
As long as this can fly at least 5000 km, carry 100 passengers in comfort …..the West loses their domination over Russian Air planes .
It doesn't matter if Russia makes better planes than West, if the FAA or Europe doesn't regulate, there's no way to sell to West. And they will never regulate Russian planes.
@@araujofi ….it is not about selling planes in the West ; western civil aviation is clearly ahead of the Russian ones however, this is about self reliance and even if the Russian planes are ten years behind the Western ones, it does not matter as they have a functioning alternative and thus the western sanctions are ineffective .
Yes, this plane is just a way of preserving national sovereignty, given that these are technologies that the West uses as a geopolitical weapon. Underdeveloped countries are subjected to this technological control. But Russia will not be able to do what Airbus did in the 70s, penetrate a market dominated by Boeing for decades.@@abeonthehill166
@@abeonthehill166misliš da zaostaje deset godina?
@@milesrem4948 ….ruclips.net/video/MZ66U16JsnI/видео.htmlsi=KL5BaMv46B3bLJJI
This is MS-21, no MC-21, didn't it?
Same
МС 21 in Russian
MS 21 in English
надежда
Кто строит свои самалёты,у той страны есть тыл по развитию своей страны😊
Самалёты…пц, ты в каком ПТУ учился?
@@MRSlonikable не все тут носители языка, а если даже и родной-русский то не обязательно в русской школе учились. Так то не выдрючивайся...
@@karabasbarabas1652 пусть тогда и пишут на родном языке
Баран ты с гор, кто тебе сказал что этот самолёт уже будет летать в ак завтра?
Some smoke in forsage mode only
Both Airbus and Boeing have smoke on the afterburner.
Yes! a 3 year old video is PROOF this plane EXISTS and is BETTER than BOEININGE
Unfortunately this engine can only fly 500 times before replacement. short life cycle.
Operating costs are 14-17% lower.
Life cycle cost is 15-20% lower than competitors.
Service life before first repair of pump unit is 20,000 hours, before first repair of all SAU-14 units is 40,000 hours.
Excellent but engines still a bit smoky
all russian engines are smoky, this is not necessarily inefficient
@@araujofi literally zero smoke in this video
This engine has (on paper) well designed modern gas generator, but during design the ultimate goal was simplicity, even for the cost of some efficiency. So it should be worse than state of the fart.
Diggers are installed on Airbus and Boeing.
@@hrissanYou don't have any expertise in engine design, so your cometarium is stupid.Lol
A lambda demonstration flight, nothing impressive. Not even a single picture from the cockpit nor the avionics compartments. Russians hiding the thruth as usual.
GOOD PROGRESS, MEANS NEW TECH, MEANS MORE COMPETITION. We need all to compete make safety .NO. 1. BOEING IS NOT SAFE , SO MANY FAULTS ,POOR QUALITY PLANES BY BOEING. BAN BOEING ON SAFETY REASONS
Очередное тупое видео в поддержку самолета которого нет и нп будет в ак
)))моста нет,самолетов нет,ничего нет,только пустыня))))
@@владикгробовский очередная тупая отписка, очередного бота
очередной тупой ответ недалекого человека)))@@vitaliyvitaliy190
Москвич 3
У тебя рак головного мозга, который выел весь твой мозг, сальный савистливый выродок. Тебя еще не кинули в мясной штурм на смерть? Хех, значит скоро отправят.