This Russian NEW MC-21 Will Change The Aviation Industry! Here's Why

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 12 сен 2024

Комментарии • 1 тыс.

  • @JesseAustinTaylor_749
    @JesseAustinTaylor_749 Месяц назад +16

    The challenges for the MC-21 are huge, but overcoming them will be even more rewarding. Best of luck!

    • @damjanm3585
      @damjanm3585 Месяц назад

      @@JesseAustinTaylor_749 This plane is technologically old on arrival.

  • @PhilipGutierrez_508
    @PhilipGutierrez_508 Месяц назад +11

    It's impressive how Russia is developing its own aircraft amidst all the sanctions. Go MC-21!

  • @a.r1761
    @a.r1761 Месяц назад +20

    I am from Afghanistan and I have to say I will always trust RUSSIAN products more than EU or US.
    We have washing machine made in Russia and it has been running for 30-40 years eventually with new technology new washing machine we got fed up using same machine for very long time , so we bought new machine hahhhahha funny it lasted 2 years and we went back to use that old russian washing machine, similarly, the fridge running 15 years so far.
    Also the residential blocks Russian made for us still standing put.
    When American came to our country they removed all Russian products from Universities and install new EU products. Won't believe it it needed fixing every 2-3 months 😂😂😂😂😂😂 .
    Take my advice and go for Russian products you will have it as long life friend

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Месяц назад +3

      Thanks for sharing your great experience!

    • @guywatts964
      @guywatts964 21 день назад

      I have a Sears Kenmore (Made in the USA) that my parents got in 1967. It still runs great.

  • @CorbinScott-b7h
    @CorbinScott-b7h Месяц назад +11

    It’s great to see more competition in the aviation industry with the introduction of the MC-21.

    • @amosbrowne680
      @amosbrowne680 12 дней назад

      @CorbinScott-b7h they stifle competition, play dirty, and say see he is struggling, and he is incompetent.

    • @amosbrowne680
      @amosbrowne680 12 дней назад

      @CorbinScott-b7h Boeing gets most of it parts source from other places. All it components are not American.

  • @user-ed4gd1ot1f
    @user-ed4gd1ot1f Месяц назад +58

    The West has gone completely wild with its sanctions, they are not killing us, but making us stronger. The food markets were closed, now Russia is the number 1 country in food exports. Cheese production, which had never existed in Russia, developed, as did viticulture, and huge orchards of apples and other fruits and berries were planted. We eat our own meat and also export it. Recently, the machine tool industry has been very developed, they began to produce very complex 5-axis machines and other different ones too. We invest a lot, and not without success, in radio electronics and work on photonic technologies. And in nuclear energy it is number one in the world. The country has everything, energy, materials, other minerals. Do what you want. We are self-sufficient.

  • @jonathanfriedlander8563
    @jonathanfriedlander8563 Месяц назад +184

    IT WONT TAKE MUCH TO BECOME A WORLD LEADER IN HEAVY ENGINEERING AS THE WEST HAS FOCUSSED ON MAKING MONEY FROM DOING NOTHING FOR 50 YEARS , BANKING & ASSOCIATED B/S .... SO CONGRATULATIONS RUSSIA !

    • @chrispaw1
      @chrispaw1 Месяц назад +4

      😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @incbluesail3080
      @incbluesail3080 Месяц назад +6

      That's true. 😂😂😂😂

    • @DeeAnn12499
      @DeeAnn12499 Месяц назад +11

      Very well said. May Russia be successful as a world power

    • @damjanm3585
      @damjanm3585 Месяц назад +1

      @@jonathanfriedlander8563 hahaha, corrupted Russia can buy only Chinese. Russians can only pump!

    • @bonaanayaga
      @bonaanayaga Месяц назад

      Why they build planes there not starting from scratch

  • @AdamPhillips-n5AdamPhillips
    @AdamPhillips-n5AdamPhillips Месяц назад +11

    The evolution of the MC-21 shows Russia's resilience in aviation. Can't wait to see it in action!

  • @RyanGutierrez_603
    @RyanGutierrez_603 Месяц назад +7

    The MC-21 looks like a game-changer for Russian aviation! Excited to see how it will compete with Boeing and Airbus.

  • @paulhughes4913
    @paulhughes4913 Месяц назад +10

    With features like composite wings, the MC-21 is definitely a step ahead. Great job, Russia!

  • @Sam-dm4kz
    @Sam-dm4kz Месяц назад +33

    MC 21 is not for western countries markets. Rostec have shifted its focus to markets for Asian, African and South American Countries only. Financing will be arranged by BRICKS BANK using local currency only.

  • @michaeljango8073
    @michaeljango8073 Месяц назад +12

    AFRICA is waiting for this Aircraft to be less 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺

  • @georgebezzegh6383
    @georgebezzegh6383 Месяц назад +12

    MC21 300, 310, 400, 500 for the New multi polar WORLD of 3/4 of population 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺👍👍

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Месяц назад

      thanks for your comment

    • @damjanm3585
      @damjanm3585 Месяц назад +1

      @@georgebezzegh6383 There is only West. Russia is a miserable country.

  • @VladimirPutinwon
    @VladimirPutinwon Месяц назад +11

    8:56 you got to love the Russians. love them and don't underestimate them

  • @sciiencehelps
    @sciiencehelps 9 дней назад +13

    Anything has got to be better than Boeing at this time.

  • @Metalrocks23
    @Metalrocks23 24 дня назад +10

    As an Indian I hope Russia succeeds in commercial aircraft making, also I’m sure America is going to sanction this so that no other western allies buy these. However, India will stand with Russia and I hope this happens.

  • @Brocambro1
    @Brocambro1 Месяц назад +10

    Most people don't realize that during Soviet times their aviation industry was 100% self sufficient, they only adopted Western planes after the collapse of the USSR which is only 30 years ago, and they are very lucky that Sukoi and illushin stayed in vegetative state so they didn't completely lose those critical manufacturing skills, but you can tell that they are really struggling to get these productions, especially mass production off the ground.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Месяц назад +1

      You're right!

    • @yaroslavgorbachov9063
      @yaroslavgorbachov9063 Месяц назад +2

      It’ll get off the ground sooner than you think.

    • @VadiGor8888
      @VadiGor8888 16 дней назад

      During Soviet times 100% self-efficiency was not a great achievement. USA, GB, and France-made planes were wholly domestically made. Globalization made the competencies distributed around the world.

  • @andimilan5348
    @andimilan5348 Месяц назад +20

    Boeing…we kill a lot of people and still get certification from easa and faa😂😂

  • @cheryl9lqk
    @cheryl9lqk Месяц назад +8

    The MC-21’s use of composite materials for its wings is quite innovative.

  • @user-nh9ec3co3c
    @user-nh9ec3co3c Месяц назад +8

    Я помню, с чего началось вытеснение из западных аэропортов самолетов советской постройки. Их об'явили слишком шумными, предварительно подняв нормативы по шуму в аэропортах .

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Месяц назад

      looking forward to hearing more about this news.

    • @t.p.8702
      @t.p.8702 6 дней назад

      Das ist ja auch richtig und wichtig für die Menschen dort.

  • @anythingwrez2932
    @anythingwrez2932 Месяц назад +30

    Sanction will create independency
    Russian doesn't need Europe's certification for domestic use

    • @alexandervt641
      @alexandervt641 Месяц назад +2

      They need Europe also for technology, components, know-how. No country in the world can maintain a competitive self-sufficient aviation industry, let alone backward Russia. The poor results of isolation you could see in the Soviet Union.

    • @CryptoHamster777
      @CryptoHamster777 Месяц назад +4

      @@alexandervt641 lol

    • @user-ed4gd1ot1f
      @user-ed4gd1ot1f Месяц назад +3

      @@alexandervt641 You are completely behind the times, my friend, Russia replaced all the imported systems on this plane. So Western technologies are no longer needed. Your thoughts are based on the old model of the world. The world is falling apart, globalism is leaving, can’t you see? From here on it will be every man for himself. The winner will be the one who jumps out of global supply chains first. Airbus could not live the Russian titanium. Which means he's on the hook. While there is nothing imported in MS 21. Regarding international certification. When the world falls apart, operating experience will be important to the buyer, not the presence of a certificate. The fate of the EU is not enviable, the US will ruin it.

    • @mariosbatas1436
      @mariosbatas1436 Месяц назад +4

      @@alexandervt641 what century are you living in? Europe is dying , thanks to the neonazi leadeship it became the 4th Reich, with homosexual leaders....

    • @user-yu1bt5go6y
      @user-yu1bt5go6y Месяц назад +2

      ​@@alexandervt641ты зря в школу ходил чувак! 😂

  • @100lancey
    @100lancey Месяц назад +18

    What does Russia need to do, to better access Western markets?
    Why, offer the global south viable alternatives like the MC21, so they too can throw of Western hegemony.

    • @alexandervt641
      @alexandervt641 Месяц назад

      Needs to stop the war. Get rid of Putins corrupt dictatorship. Establish market economy instead of oligarchy. Then Russia may have a chance also to build a competitive aviation industry. Currently, the country returns into the middle age.

    • @zahrans
      @zahrans Месяц назад +2

      @@alexandervt641
      1. Maybe finally acknowledge that it was the west who has been constantly pushing since 2014 for a war with Russia using its UKR proxies?
      2. I'd say the legalised bribery & Atlantist group think present in the US & the collective west is greater & more harmful than anything in Putins 'corrupt dictatorship'
      3. If you need to see plenty of big oligarchy in action have a look in the west. Only there they are labeled as job creators or entrepreneurs.
      4. The Russians will build a competitive aviation industry sanctions or no sactions or whether the west likes it or not. Of that I have no doubt.
      5. Russia has recently moved up to become Europe's biggest economy in terms of PPP, surpassing the UK and even Germany. Your prediction of 'Rus returning to the middle age' is going swimmingly!

    • @alexandervt641
      @alexandervt641 Месяц назад

      ⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠@@zahrans
      1. Putins regime holds full responsibility for the war, see UN resolutions. Also for the Krim annexation in 2014. Your statement is simply crazy.
      2. Russia is Europes most corrupt country, see also CPI index. The whole economy is based on monopolism and nepotism.
      3. Oligarchs exist in Russia (and Ukraine) because there competition is replaced by proximity to power.
      4. Current regime will build only bullshit like in the last 25 years. Did you ever see any industrial product from Russia?
      5. Russia is number 2 in Europe by PPP and number 5 nominal. Even this tiny economy is driven by oil, and now, outdated arms.

    • @jerromedrakejr9332
      @jerromedrakejr9332 Месяц назад

      @@alexandervt641 UN resolutions are NOTHING!
      Do you remember the UN resolution on the integrity of Serbia, which NATO violated at the same moment when it signed it and created the "state of Kosovo", and the UN said that what NATO did was legitimate even though it attacked Serbia without UN approval!?
      You think anyone on this planet after 1999 cares what the UN says!?
      You mention unjustified aggression and state sovereignty, and only a few years before that you wholeheartedly supported unjustified aggression and violation of state sovereignty!

    • @alexandervt641
      @alexandervt641 Месяц назад +1

      ⁠@@jerromedrakejr9332 If the UN is nothing Russia could leave it. Would be best for all as long as Putins regime is in power. They don‘t do it because UN is important. Concerning Serbia, each UN country could bring in a resolution or, in case of Kosovo (still not an UN member), security council members veto it. They didn’t do it because Serbia / Yugoslavia was responsible for worst crimes in Bosnia. Problem is not the UN but Putins aggression.
      Your whole logic is corrupted. If there have been unjustified wars, each aggression is justified? By the way, I am Russian.

  • @sipet214
    @sipet214 Месяц назад +9

    Russia has more than 100 years of successful aeronautical history. Russia designed and build the best 5 generation fighter planes. For Russia designing and producing the MC-21 was a piece of cake.
    Considering the safety record of BOEING 737 max and the quality of production (even BOEING employees are afraid of flying with 737 max) I am sure that MC-21 has a bright future.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Месяц назад +1

      yes

    • @andreisokolenko7719
      @andreisokolenko7719 Месяц назад +1

      It has never been a piece of cake though. But it is doable.
      Let's watch it in progress. I do trust Russian engineers.

    • @alexandervt641
      @alexandervt641 Месяц назад +1

      What 5 generation fighter planes? The Su 57? Just produced in tiny quantities, it is of terrible quality. The US call it the worst stealth jet on earth.

    • @yaroslavgorbachov9063
      @yaroslavgorbachov9063 Месяц назад

      @@alexandervt641 complete and utter bull. Ukrainian PsyOp troll detected.

    • @bernarddavis1050
      @bernarddavis1050 14 дней назад

      @@alexandervt641 Well would you expect the US (whatever that is supposed to mean) to say anything different? Get real.

  • @andrs8953
    @andrs8953 Месяц назад +16

    Good job Russians,

  • @tabasco-jf7eb
    @tabasco-jf7eb Месяц назад +16

    Boeing jets here are MALFUNCTION every day, scary as f😮

  • @BellaBinise
    @BellaBinise Месяц назад +7

    Russia’s push for domestic aircraft production is a smart move given the current geopolitical climate.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Месяц назад

      Thanks for your comment

    • @yxmichaelxyyxmichaelxy3074
      @yxmichaelxyyxmichaelxy3074 Месяц назад +1

      They have ALWAYS had domestic passenger aircraft production, even longer than the West as the Soviet Union. You think Soviet passenger planes were Boeings?

  • @isannedonatella
    @isannedonatella Месяц назад +6

    The MC-21 sounds like a significant development for Russian aviation! Excited to see how it performs.

  • @isaackinyua5756
    @isaackinyua5756 Месяц назад +13

    Congratulations to Russia. I hope the nation is able to improve its airplanes and have them competitive in the international market.

  • @thierryk5381
    @thierryk5381 Месяц назад +15

    Countries like russia, china, bresil, india should not be buyjng planes from the west but make their own..they have the technology to do so

    • @t.p.8702
      @t.p.8702 6 дней назад

      Nein, haben sie nicht.

  • @KumariRaita-un6tw
    @KumariRaita-un6tw Месяц назад +4

    The MC-21’s development is a strong statement about Russia’s capabilities in aerospace. It will be exciting to see how it performs against established aircraft.

  • @AdalgisaManna
    @AdalgisaManna Месяц назад +4

    The evolution of the MC-21 is fascinating. From the Yak 242 to the sleek MC-21, what a journey!

  • @Hr-pf6vz
    @Hr-pf6vz Месяц назад +10

    If it’s Boeing I’m not going.

  • @ashokthakor5141
    @ashokthakor5141 Месяц назад +4

    The focus on domestic production in Russia is a strategic move. If the MC-21 meets its targets, it could significantly boost Russia’s aviation industry.

  • @konaraweb
    @konaraweb Месяц назад +8

    Sanctions backfired

  • @VoQuocMat
    @VoQuocMat Месяц назад +2

    The MC-21 looks like a serious contender in the aviation market. Excited to see how it stacks up against the big players.

  • @basilfoster3107
    @basilfoster3107 Месяц назад +11

    The Russian aviation industry needs to cooperate with the Chinese aviation industry in order to have success for both.
    They have the engineering and technical know-how. It is just a matter of implementation. Initially they may need to bypass Western markets due to sanctions, however, there are other markets outside of the West and Europe and America is not the entire world.

    • @remix-yy1hs
      @remix-yy1hs Месяц назад

      Yes

    • @disconductorder
      @disconductorder Месяц назад

      Russia creates as many engineers with 1/2 population of US
      China has more than them.
      The United states has no where to go but down

    • @yxmichaelxyyxmichaelxy3074
      @yxmichaelxyyxmichaelxy3074 Месяц назад

      No, they don't. From whence came Chinese engine technology? Soviet Union.

    • @disconductorder
      @disconductorder Месяц назад

      @@yxmichaelxyyxmichaelxy3074 China isn't like the old days, they've come along way and very fast. They might not be as innovative but that comes down to risk taking. Chinese engineers in elite positions were educated in the west, they are not behind.

    • @yxmichaelxyyxmichaelxy3074
      @yxmichaelxyyxmichaelxy3074 Месяц назад

      @@disconductorder
      Most of theitlr innovation is from having reverse-engineered Soviet equipment. Their entire space program was derived from Soviet technology.

  • @LeviDruro
    @LeviDruro Месяц назад +5

    Using out-of-autoclave composite manufacturing for the wings is impressive. That's some advanced technology!

  • @zerooneonetwothree1872
    @zerooneonetwothree1872 22 дня назад +5

    I honestly expected to close the video before i clicked on it, but you remained objective and informed troughout the video. Thank you!

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  22 дня назад +1

      Thank you. Feel free to visit us next time!

  • @azmalkhan01
    @azmalkhan01 Месяц назад +11

    Russia very long history of building its own aircraft it only in 1990s they decided to buy Western aircraft after Soviet Union collapsed but they realise they need to bulid their own civilian aircraft they start building long before the sanctions started first started with Super jet 100 now MC-21

  • @riyowang4769
    @riyowang4769 Месяц назад +23

    Why US and European safety board, put sanction on giving safety sertificate for the MC-21 and SSJ? Which more important, human being safety or politics and money? Its really a big dissapointment on how the so call democracy and human right countries patron.

    • @urfindzhyus2115
      @urfindzhyus2115 Месяц назад +5

      It's capitalism - life for the profit of those who are owing the means of production and control governments, media, etc. How can democracy exist under capitalism? It is nonsense and that's exactly why capitalistic countries scream that they are democratic.

    • @StrangerInMorocco2023
      @StrangerInMorocco2023 Месяц назад +1

      It is over man... 80% of the world's population know the truth and no longer TRUST the West.. If you want a better future, focus on Russia, China, Emirates, Turkey, and Brazil.

  • @tariqshah7890
    @tariqshah7890 Месяц назад +6

    Russian submarines a d rocket engines have proven record. I have flown on some airlines in early 70's they are superb. Given the economic sanctions they may be slow but hay! they're the one that started the Chinese heavy industries.

  • @usufsk1837
    @usufsk1837 Месяц назад +3

    The MC-21 sounds like a real game-changer for Russian aviation. It’s impressive to see how Russia is developing its own aircraft amid sanctions.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Месяц назад

      thanks for your feedback

  • @nikkol2qqx
    @nikkol2qqx Месяц назад +4

    I’m curious to see how the MC-21 will stack up against the Boeing 737 Max and Airbus A320.

  • @steveabdelkoui5663
    @steveabdelkoui5663 Месяц назад +7

    Regardless Russia never loses. The west always do.

  • @Visionery1
    @Visionery1 Месяц назад +11

    Necessity is the mother of invention.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Месяц назад +1

      thanks for your feedback

  • @BrandonCharlesAdams
    @BrandonCharlesAdams Месяц назад +3

    Interesting to see how the MC-21 stacks up against the 737 Max. Competition is heating up!

  • @nguyenlucTurtle
    @nguyenlucTurtle Месяц назад +3

    The MC-21’s features and specifications look promising. It’s clear that Russia is serious about making a mark in commercial aviation.

  • @bobdeverell
    @bobdeverell Месяц назад +7

    Wonder how it compares with the Comac C919. Looks like the Airbus / Boeing duopoly is coming to an end.

    • @user-wg4gd1cu8v
      @user-wg4gd1cu8v Месяц назад

      They've already lost clients. Russia builds its own planes and COMAC is going to sell its planes all over. And these planes are a lot cheaper!

  • @VladimirPutinwon
    @VladimirPutinwon Месяц назад +8

    1:34 congratulations to the Russian people. why would anybody want to pick a fight with them

  • @Cuplex1
    @Cuplex1 24 дня назад +9

    They don't need to compete in the west, the countries in the global majority has plenty of market share. Europe is the major looser in the sanctions war, for instance when it comes to flights between Europe and China because they are not allowed to fly over Russian airspace.
    But even more so when it comes to access to cheep energy.
    The world is a big place, the market in Asia, South America and Africa have plenty of business opportunities. 👍

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  24 дня назад +1

      In the fact that it hasn't been any successful sign yet in one of those

  • @rickyricardo75
    @rickyricardo75 Месяц назад +8

    I'm ready to pay an extra fee to fly on these russian planes and avoid Boeing killing aircrafts

  • @terrencedludlu8370
    @terrencedludlu8370 Месяц назад +7

    To increase international access and sales they should do things like produce some parts of it in other continents like in Africa, Latin America. This will entice those governments to buy this aircraft knowing that they are also supporting their own Russian locally based industries and subsequently increasing trade relations.

    • @hans-georgwerner3826
      @hans-georgwerner3826 Месяц назад +3

      Irgendwann werden die USA und ihre Satelliten nicht mehr die Macht haben andere auszuschließen.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Месяц назад +2

      yes

  • @davidball7712
    @davidball7712 Месяц назад +7

    Fine looking, attractive aircraft. I would love to fly in it.

  • @МихаилРозов-ю9п
    @МихаилРозов-ю9п Месяц назад +6

    For this russian aircraft to have better acces to intenational markets Russia should stop tolerate illegal actions of the nations of which NATO consists and abolish those.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Месяц назад

      Thanks for your comment.

  • @steveabdelkoui5663
    @steveabdelkoui5663 Месяц назад +6

    I know Algeria will be in line for this aircraft.

    • @alexandervt641
      @alexandervt641 Месяц назад

      Why don’t they order some? In fact, after so many years there are almost no foreign orders for the MC-21.

    • @cpy74mm
      @cpy74mm Месяц назад

      @@alexandervt641 Because the West will sanction them if they do. It has nothing to do with the aircraft. Also, they will not certify it. It doesn't matter though. The West lost a good customer for its planes and Russia will save some money in the process and have its own commercial aviation industry redeveloped. Times change and once the politics allow it they will really take off and sell their aviation products to the rest of the world.

  • @salvalela-hp9lt
    @salvalela-hp9lt Месяц назад +6

    Great 👍 job

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Месяц назад

      thanks for your feedback

  • @user-ur2om5po3e
    @user-ur2om5po3e Месяц назад +5

    Never was heavily dependent on western because they are master of their aviation industry and there was no incident of failure like boing. West are jealous about Russian and Chinese progress.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Месяц назад

      Thanks for sharing your thoughts!

  • @CarlosQuesadaR
    @CarlosQuesadaR 28 дней назад +7

    The front windows seemed to offer a wide range of view. Nice plane. Well done for Russia

  • @kevinagnes19
    @kevinagnes19 Месяц назад +4

    Interesting to see how Russia has shifted focus to domestic aircraft production due to sanctions.

  • @kapaomegatau
    @kapaomegatau Месяц назад +6

    US cerification is other tricky tool to keep control over other aviation industry competitors regardless those competitors are better.

  • @Lolonilola
    @Lolonilola Месяц назад +5

    Lol. RUSSIA HAS MUCH BETTER ECONOMY THAN ANY COUNTRIES IN EUROPE😂😂😂
    US AND CANADA ARE HAVING A HARD TIME RIGHT NOW WHICH ITS CITIZENS are struggling to afford even a basic commodities…sanctions doesn’t hurt RUSSIA at all but it fires back. EUROPE is still dependent on Russian resources. Without Russia, Europe will slowly die😂😂😂😂

  • @ivk9642
    @ivk9642 Месяц назад +12

    The war made Russia powerfull

  • @danielkurtovic9099
    @danielkurtovic9099 Месяц назад +6

    MC-21 russian aviation rise like Fenix from soviet time. Now, take a seat and enjoy.

  • @VadiGor8888
    @VadiGor8888 16 дней назад +7

    0:33 Historically, Soviet Russia relied on its own 100% Soviet-made component base. Now, it will be the only country with a 100% domestically made plane of this type.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  16 дней назад

      Yep!

    • @alexandervt641
      @alexandervt641 15 дней назад

      Not Soviet Russia but Soviet Union. Anyway: For exactly this reason Soviet airplanes were not competitive and the lag increased with every year. By returning to this anachronism, Russia will fall back by decades.

  • @DavidsonIbragimova
    @DavidsonIbragimova Месяц назад +3

    The MC-21 vs. 737 Max comparison will be interesting to watch. Competition is always good for the industry.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Месяц назад

      Thanks for your feedback

  • @dominicchanwenshun
    @dominicchanwenshun Месяц назад +5

    MC-21 definitely.

  • @vohaue9V
    @vohaue9V Месяц назад +2

    Russia’s push for self-sufficiency in aviation is impressive. The MC-21’s specs suggest it could shake up the industry.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Месяц назад

      Thanks for your comment!

  • @barbaranostrand4214
    @barbaranostrand4214 21 день назад +7

    There is a pretty good documentary out there covering the development of these aircraft. While marketed as being part of a pre-existing family of aircraft, the two new planes were pretty much designed "from the ground up" as a brand new airframe. It is most likely more advanced than anything that Boeing is currently capable of designing due to corporate reorganization following moving their headquarters to Chicago. Airbus has its own problems resulting from if nothing else the damage that the Russo-Ukrainian War has done to the European economy in general and Germany in particular.

    • @alexandervt641
      @alexandervt641 17 дней назад

      Biggest problem of Airbus is too many orders. Putins rotten industry has the inverse problem: nobody wants the outdated Russian products. MC-21 is good example: the jet which is in „development“ for nearly 20 years received almost no orders except from Russian state companies. And Western sanctions send tiny Russian industry back into the middle age. Here, MC-21 is also a good example: Despite numerous statements that Russian industry can replace foreign components, the commencement of the flight operations is postponed from year to year.

    • @sooriyakumar5102
      @sooriyakumar5102 15 дней назад

      The draconian sanctions on Russia have forced them to become self-sufficient in all sectors. Once they sorted out the Ukranian war, with a highly modernised and invigorated war economy and 100% free from Western shackles, they are set to go leaps and bounds full scale. West will have to drop the sanctions and open their market again. Initially, like any new planes, the C21 will go through the teething phase. Once pass that, it will give the overpriced Boing and Airbus the run for the money. Good Luck😊!.

  • @ChildOfDarkness85
    @ChildOfDarkness85 Месяц назад +5

    I would prefer the MC-21 over the 737 Max 9. But i honestly hope that Boeing comes back to the market with a new CEO that puts Engineers back in charge and sets quality as the major priority than profit.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Месяц назад +1

      yep thanks for your sharing

    • @consciousplanet8887
      @consciousplanet8887 Месяц назад +1

      New ceo new same old same old boeing already sold to wall st. Just look at the stuck space craft. Starlimo high price what chance does a cheap 737 has?

    • @slimm2837
      @slimm2837 Месяц назад

      They need to investigate first what happened to the whistle blower then think about the new ceo

  • @mothusiletsatsi3279
    @mothusiletsatsi3279 22 дня назад +5

    Great invention, The Russian are too Powerfull and Independant!!

  • @HoSuongUyen
    @HoSuongUyen Месяц назад +1

    The MC-21’s use of composite materials is a game-changer. It’s great to see innovation coming from Russia despite the sanctions.

  • @nanaegorasta9063
    @nanaegorasta9063 Месяц назад +13

    THANKS YOU PUTIN FOR TRUE LOVE FOR RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺👍🏻

    • @alexandervt641
      @alexandervt641 Месяц назад +1

      If Putin loves Russia, why he stealing for 25 years? And why he started the Ukraine war where hundreds of thousands young Russians died or have been wounded?

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Месяц назад

      ✈️✈️

  • @CarrickThaoChau
    @CarrickThaoChau Месяц назад +1

    The evolution of the MC-21 is fascinating. From its early designs to its current state, it shows significant progress.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Месяц назад

      Thanks for your comment!

  • @JacobRubioJunior669
    @JacobRubioJunior669 Месяц назад +11

    🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺♥️♥️

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Месяц назад

      Sorry, I will do it well the next time!

  • @Sashi_Gupta007
    @Sashi_Gupta007 Месяц назад +2

    The comparison between the MC-21 and the 737 Max will be crucial. If the MC-21 performs well, it could shake things up in the narrow-body aircraft market.

  • @a.r1761
    @a.r1761 Месяц назад +7

    Please god never coincide me flying in boeng MAX , it's killing trap

  • @charlesduncan3782
    @charlesduncan3782 Месяц назад +3

    For the most parts, the plane has a clean technical record over the max. More importantly, with BRICS, and the impact of a multipolar economic system, Certification and buyer preferences will have less to do with Europe’s standards or the likes. The world as we can technically has changed. A good example is in chips world. Speed and calibration in light years are amazing. It’s now time to once again think twice. Act once. It’s no longer, living on past glory.

  • @manukk2311
    @manukk2311 Месяц назад +12

    Boeing max aircrafts are flying coffin. Good luck to people who board them.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Месяц назад

      ✈✈

    • @starlight122012
      @starlight122012 Месяц назад

      Thanks, I stupidly booked Southwest Airlines to fly to Texas in late August, didn't realise all their aircraft are Boeings

  • @KaranMishra-bg6pp
    @KaranMishra-bg6pp Месяц назад +2

    With the MC-21 entering the market, the competition is heating up. It will be intriguing to watch how this new player affects the dynamics of the aviation industry.

  • @Tony-gq8pi
    @Tony-gq8pi Месяц назад +6

    If it is Boing I am not going

  • @jungletunes3923
    @jungletunes3923 Месяц назад +4

    If China and Russia come together and built a plane that will be end of the story. Russia will produce engine while China built the other parts.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Месяц назад +1

      yes

    • @alexandervt641
      @alexandervt641 Месяц назад

      They tried with the Comac C929. However, after the sanctions Chinese forced Russia to withdrew from the project. Nobody needs the outdated Russian technology.

  • @bernarddavis1050
    @bernarddavis1050 14 дней назад +6

    IF IT'S BOEING, I AIN'T GOING - and there are millions saying the same thing

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  14 дней назад

      :(

    • @chespocket1756
      @chespocket1756 11 дней назад +1

      If it’s made by Airbus, I’ll use it definitely not this Russian thing!

    • @bernarddavis1050
      @bernarddavis1050 11 дней назад

      @@chespocket1756 Well the choice probably won't arise. No matter how good the "Russian thing" is, western political interests will always override mere technical considerations like safety and efficiency. BTW the Americans would sanction Airbus if they could. US corporate shareholder interests top everything.

  • @RogerJustinEdwards
    @RogerJustinEdwards Месяц назад +1

    The use of out-of-autoclave composite manufacturing technology for the MC-21's wings is impressive. This innovation could set new standards in aircraft production.

  • @TrươngQuỳnhTươi
    @TrươngQuỳnhTươi Месяц назад +4

    The potential market for the MC-21 is huge. It’ll be exciting to see how it performs and how it impacts the competition.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Месяц назад

      Thanks for your feedback!

  • @BarbarosGunes
    @BarbarosGunes Месяц назад +6

    In any case it would be safer than flying with a Boeing on the passenger side...

    • @fedorbasmanov9124
      @fedorbasmanov9124 Месяц назад

      Конечно будет безопаснее, ведь ни за что не попадёт в аварию то, что никогда не полетит.

  • @user-mx7vw6vf4i
    @user-mx7vw6vf4i 26 дней назад +6

    Самолет МС-21 отличный самолет особенно двигатель это действительно Автомат Калашникова если все конструктивные части будут производить свои заводы а не лавки Нью-Орка или Китая. И вообще все комплектующие будут делать по технологиям что было задумано то это будет в 1000 раз лучше чем самые лучшие заводы Америки или Европы. что могут со стряпать похожий самолет.

    • @anatolyprox3805
      @anatolyprox3805 26 дней назад

      Я до сих пор посню ТЗ на создание станков для пдшки и следующего поколения. Это был 2012 год. Мой коллега сообщил, что первая серийная успешно прошла испытания ещё в 2019. Мы можем все это сделать.

    • @alexandervt641
      @alexandervt641 26 дней назад

      Если сами всё будут делать, значит будет самое похабное качество. Как в СССР. Таковы законы экономики, но конечно можно повторять ошибки ещё сто раз.

    • @user-mx7vw6vf4i
      @user-mx7vw6vf4i 25 дней назад

      @@alexandervt641 Если вы так говорите то вы ни когда и слыхом не слыхивали Что такое Настоящий Советский Союз. Да и вам говорить нельзя во первых не поймете а лучше будите рекламировать Американское Качество. А Россия для вас это дикость. Ну что же живите с этим.

    • @alexandervt641
      @alexandervt641 25 дней назад

      @@user-mx7vw6vf4i Я жил в СССР и не надо рассказывать сказки. Разделение и специализация труда являются экономическими законами, которые СССР (в том числе) игнорировал. Повторение этих ошибок приведёт к такому же плачевному результату.

    • @user-mx7vw6vf4i
      @user-mx7vw6vf4i 25 дней назад

      @@alexandervt641 А причем здесь Разделение и Специализация труда? Ты наверное и знал Сталинские законы За измену Родине? Политические статьи В СССР даже в сталинские годы была проблема с фальсификатом продуктов, некачественными продуктами. Понятно, что проблема была не столь явной, как в современной, но все же регулярно принимались меры, чтобы это предотвратить.
      Как наказывали людей, которые не делали по ГОСТу, либо вообще занимались фальсификатом? Об этом расскажет Указ Президиума ВС СССР от 10.07.1940, где совершенно четко указано, какая ответственность будет за подобное. Понятно сразу, что штрафами в такой ситуации отделаться бы не вышло, потому что ответственность при Сталине была реальной.
      Итак, в случае, если человек нарушал нормы по ГОСТу, пытался продать некачественные продукты, что подтвердила бы проверка на качество, то ему грозил тюремный срок от 5 до 8 лет. Это строго соблюдалось, независимо от положения того, кто продавал некачественную продукцию.
      Таким образом, все были заинтересованы в том, чтобы все соблюдалось четко. В основном все было по закону, потому что в действительности в эти годы сложно найти мотивацию, чтобы нарушать закон.
      Она могла быть только в случае, если бы пришлось, например, слишком быстро изготовить продукцию из-за того, что люди не успевают, а для этого, возможно, нарушить какие-то нормы, но это, конечно, мелочь по сравнению с тем, какие нарушения бывают в современности.
      В целом выпуск любой продукции, которая не соответствовала государственному стандарту качества, по закону считалось противогосударственным поступком, политическим вредительством.
      Кто конкретно нёс ответственность за это, то есть кому грозил срок от 5 до 8 лет? Прежде всего это относилось к директорам и начальникам отделов контроля качества. Потому что перед продажей эти люди должны знать качество.
      В плане качества продуктов питания чаще всего речь шла о хлебобулочных изделиях, так как там разным причинам не всегда удавалось организовать работу правильно, то есть было слишком много испорченной продукции, либо продукции, которая не соответствовала стандартам, если учесть практику по данному закону.

  • @guardiaguardia3017
    @guardiaguardia3017 Месяц назад +8

    737 Max has proven to be a unsafe plane.

    • @user-ed4gd1ot1f
      @user-ed4gd1ot1f Месяц назад +1

      Boeing has completely ruined its reputation. I think this is the collapse of the company. It's not about the engineers, the production culture has been lost, the competencies have been lost. Racial equality is one of the attributes of this phenomenon.

    • @Jose-b2k1u
      @Jose-b2k1u Месяц назад +1

      Boeing? Not going!

  • @khalidnazer3905
    @khalidnazer3905 Месяц назад +5

    We will come competition, it’s good for consumers and advance technology.

    • @alexandervt641
      @alexandervt641 Месяц назад

      The MC-21 is no competition, it’s not even operational.

    • @oldevilgreendog
      @oldevilgreendog Месяц назад

      No competition will happen. Westerners are first to just ban every competitor if situation is not in their favour.

  • @FlorisBaoVy
    @FlorisBaoVy Месяц назад +2

    The MC-21 vs. 737 Max comparison will be one to watch. Both have unique advantages that could influence the industry’s future.

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Месяц назад

      Thanks for your feedback!

  • @K0ROLOV
    @K0ROLOV 9 дней назад +4

    Nice review on mc 21, subscribed 🤝🤝🤝

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  8 дней назад

      Thanks a lot. Please support us more!

  • @ArnieGiaMinh
    @ArnieGiaMinh Месяц назад +1

    Interesting to see how the MC-21 will fit into the global aviation landscape. It’s definitely a noteworthy development.

  • @timothyantipodes7646
    @timothyantipodes7646 Месяц назад +5

    I think people would rather buy Russia than Chinese. Here Russia can make all the major bits, whereas china cannot. Boeing should have left the engineers in charge, the Dreamliner would not have been was it 7-8 years late

  • @micamika8844
    @micamika8844 Месяц назад +7

    Russia will be back in the aviation market ... For sure in the BRICS market !!!

  • @Am-vo5cu
    @Am-vo5cu Месяц назад +20

    God is with Russia!

  • @HaroldJimenez_377
    @HaroldJimenez_377 Месяц назад +1

    The MC-21 300 variant, unveiled in 2016, marks a major milestone for Russian aviation. Its advanced design and features show Russia's capability in developing competitive commercial aircraft.

  • @kapalik68
    @kapalik68 Месяц назад +7

    1 Russians always make better designs

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Месяц назад

      thanks for your comment

  • @jonathanfriedlander8563
    @jonathanfriedlander8563 Месяц назад +6

    Superior engineering is the way forward for russia !!

  • @JonatanKeegan
    @JonatanKeegan Месяц назад +2

    The MC-21 could be a real game-changer for Russian aviation. Exciting times ahead!

  • @julianplaysthis
    @julianplaysthis Месяц назад +3

    Lovely video keep the work up

    • @FLIGAVIA
      @FLIGAVIA  Месяц назад +1

      many thanks, have a nice day

  • @amosbrowne680
    @amosbrowne680 12 дней назад +4

    It was not a priority then. Besides, it would have been difficult to get a niche in the market. Now it is .
    There are more safety issues in the West than Russia. They will overcome all those obstacles soon

  • @_Tony.Montana
    @_Tony.Montana Месяц назад +8

    Boeing is no longer safe aircraft to travel with, that company should be forced to close down.

    • @alexandervt641
      @alexandervt641 Месяц назад

      If so, why Russia didn‘t shut down its Boeing fleet?

    • @_Tony.Montana
      @_Tony.Montana Месяц назад

      @@alexandervt641 + I didint know Russia have a Boeing Fleet, Not Air Bus ?

    • @alexandervt641
      @alexandervt641 Месяц назад

      @@_Tony.Montana They have both Airbus and Boeing, about 50:50.

    • @_Tony.Montana
      @_Tony.Montana Месяц назад

      @@alexandervt641 + That explain why they are bulding their own brand

    • @jerromedrakejr9332
      @jerromedrakejr9332 Месяц назад +1

      @@alexandervt641 ... a legacy from a long-ago time when Russians naively believed in equal cooperation with the West...
      Sooner or later Russia will make a series of 100% domestic planes and the west will only be able to hate them for that...