The old version is a bit capricious on old bodies, like 5d2. My copy misses often, and not in a consistent, predictable way, but rather randomly, so adjusting is mostly useless. On a mirrorless camera, it's a much more stable lens. And I find the R6's stabilization quite useful down to semi-macro distances. However, I have used this lens very often on 5D2 as a portrait lens, and against the sun too, I like this flare. And this combination made many photos in motion and static, suitable for uploading to the stock, despite all the shortcomings. But here we should thank not the camera and the lens, but my and the model's patience, because we did many takes to please the god of large numbers and somehow, rather purely by chance, get photos in focus. 😁 I didn't have 100 2.8 L, but from what I know, this is apparently a more stable lens. However, it's all the same with mirrorless cameras. If a DSLR accidentally hits an object in motion, a mirrorless camera accidentally misses. Last year I lived in a village where there were a lot of cats and taking a series of photos so focus is right in the eye of a moving cat, for the R6 and EF 100 2.8 USM macro is just another Tuesday.
This is such a geat and straight forward video. Im looking to buy this lens and just havent made up my mind if the extra money is worth it for the L series lens or not. Also you made me really hunry with the cooking portion of video! Your photography work is amazing!
Regarding the different focus points in the food photography video, it may be backfocusing. Had this issue with a lens I bought recently. You can correct for it in camera with new canon cameras.
I've had one for years, and I love it. ( In fact I was using it yesterday on insects. ) When used with LIVE VIEW and a tripod, one can get razor sharp pix!
Great video, I'm looking to upgrade to the L version from the old USM, this review was very helpful :) Looks like you need to do some AFMA adjustments with one of the lenses to take care of that problem with focusing - luckily the 6D Mk II has that feature built in!
Why u plan to upgrade? I'm having a 24-70 f2.8 n planning to have something with good Bokeh. So considering 85 1.8 as it fits d budget. But since it's not L series thinking to go for it or choose something else.. mainly for portriats
Thank you for your great work, getting the old one as I only need it for still photography on tripod/indoor use only, so can do without the weather seal and stabilization. : )
Loved the review, i was offered a 100 USM for exchange on my 70-200 f4 , with money back, i'm really tempted in doing the exchange. But worried I might miss my 70-200. Overall i use the 70-200 to shoot birds, but not that much, the 100mm seems to be more usefull to me (as i like to shoot macro too). The mininum focus on the 70-200 is hard on me sometimes.
@@OmaGhomrawi I'm using a Canon XSI right now, 12mp cropped sensor. Going to a mirrorless someday, mainly because of size, travel a lot and a full frame, full size, DLSR is just too big. The deal went down, but the 100mm still is on my list!! for sure.
Thanks for making the video! Definitely the latest lenses are better! What do you think of Sony 90mm macro lens? Which one do you like better quality, beauty, and AF?
Thanks for watching! I am currently making a video for Sony 90mm macro vs Tokina 100mm macro, which gonna be published in few weeks. However, Tokina is half the price and has decent image quality relatively close to Sony, but no image stabilization and slower auto focus. Stay Tuned!
do you prefer your current website template or your website template that you show above? what builder do you use to build them?:) i think your previous template looks dope!
Both designed made on wix. I switched to new design 3 days ago by the way. I am designer by the way so both designs made from scratch. I didn’t use a template
salam Omar, great video man keep it up.. I want to ask about cameras, the 6D mark II is in the same price range of the Sony a7 III, which one you think is better in terms of overall image results ? thank you
I bought a little Sony a6500 to see if I like Sony line of camera, and quality wise I think they both are good but its about the features for me. I can record vids, pictures and web cam all in one. So see what is best bang for you buck. I don't know if ill go full Sony since I already invested in canon though.
Depends. There are a lot of good adapter from canon to Sony so even when you are heavily invested in canon lenses you can still use them, for me just look at the features and go from that. But for me I’d go Sony just so I could try mirrorless lenses as well.
Great video, very informative! I am subscribed! Just one question, when it comes to portrait photography would you say the Canon 135mm 2.0 L Lens is superior to the 100mm 2.0 new version? Thanks!
hi very good video. I wonder about the older version of the 100mm macro how will it work on a crop? Won't it be too long or unusable for a portrait? I thought I would buy a classic 85 1.8 or 100 2.0 but I was fascinated by this macro
This is what I was looking for man!! Thanks a lot!!! I will be buying the old one today. Hopefully it works well with the A7III and Sigma 11. I will let you know how it goes :)
Enjoyed your post, I have the old 100 macro as well as well as these vintage: EF-L 28-70mm 2.8; EF-L 17-35; EF 75-300 4-5.6 IS & EF-L 70-200 2.8 which one should I keep or shall I sell it & get the new ones Thank you.
At the moment I'm using 24-105mm F4L with reverse macro mount. Really hard to get the perfect focus, because it is fully manually. Since I already have L lens, I'm thinking hard on the 2.8L. But a friend says I should just go with the non-L. What do you recommend?
Hey Villiam, As I tested both L and non L last year, I almost remember they hold the same image quality, while the non L is more sensitive to lens flare. If you're shooting macro on a tripod or have enough light, the non L is a good option though. If you're doing macro for fun, Save yourself some money and attach your extension tubes to a 50mm lens. Check this one ruclips.net/video/u-xWMPYPI7I/видео.html
I've watched this video ruclips.net/video/fT1fcwMu8jY/видео.html couple months ago, and bought Canon FD NEW 28mm f2.8 (40 years old lens) to try macro on macro like the video addressed. Unfortunately, the focus area is very narrow same as I'm using extension tubes.
Indeed it does help. Eventually if the lens is built to bounce light inside the glass, lens hood wouldnt help that much. Tried to put my hand to block the sun and doesn't help that much
A. Giordano there is no macro lens that can do all the food , video and vlogging. Im not expert in APSC canon cameras. But try to find a zoom lens starts from wide to medium or long telephoto
مرحبا شكرا عتواصلك، لم يسبق لي ان تعرف عليه. محتوى القناة بالإنكليزي وكان هذا القرار منذ البداية اولا لتصل المعلومه لكل فئات البشر ولا املك الوقت الكافي لانشاء محتوى عربي من ناحية اخرى
This is a very poor test of sharpness. To see the difference you need to photograph the same subject then blow up the images on a computer screen. If he had done that he would have seen superiority of L version. And what about sharpness at 1:2 and 1:1? He does not test for sharpness at magnifications for which most photographers buy such a lens. You need to photograph something tiny with lots of minute barely visible detail and then blow up the results. No one ever does that in these lens test vids.
Thanks. I'm using the new version on a C100 mkII as I'm basically into video. Planning to get a second camera for B-roll which is why I was aking about the 600D. I'll probably jump for the 80D to keep the same crop factor as many of my lenses are EF-S.
Indeed c100 is perfect for videos. I switched to Sony system, and have sold all my canon gear 6 months ago. Im pretty happy with the new system. I own a full frame camera A7 iii and a6500 apcs camera as well. I do both videos and photography, feeling satisfied with both cams.
Great video Oma, I was looking at the new 100mm macro for some insect work as Canon Live Chat ( bit.ly/2Y6IbTY )were saying it was probably my best bet, your video has helped decide it as well, thanks!!! Do you think for things like ants this is probably a better option than a shorter focal length (60mm?)
@@OmaGhomrawi yeah I was thinking for insects, I agree IS version is definitely the way to go unless I can get the insects to pose in front of a tripod haha!
Canon 100mm macro NEW
Amazon ➭ geni.us/p7QXXt eBay ➭ ebay.to/2mc2Pmi
Canon 100mm macro OLD
Amazon ➭ geni.us/p7QXXt eBay ➭ ebay.to/2mhjy7P
Nfjjfjifjjrjtiig
Dkdjjf
I have the old version. Thanks for the comparison so I feel now I do not really need an upgrade.
If you do upgrade, give me a holler and I'll buy the old one off of you
The old version is a bit capricious on old bodies, like 5d2. My copy misses often, and not in a consistent, predictable way, but rather randomly, so adjusting is mostly useless.
On a mirrorless camera, it's a much more stable lens. And I find the R6's stabilization quite useful down to semi-macro distances.
However, I have used this lens very often on 5D2 as a portrait lens, and against the sun too, I like this flare.
And this combination made many photos in motion and static, suitable for uploading to the stock, despite all the shortcomings. But here we should thank not the camera and the lens, but my and the model's patience, because we did many takes to please the god of large numbers and somehow, rather purely by chance, get photos in focus. 😁
I didn't have 100 2.8 L, but from what I know, this is apparently a more stable lens. However, it's all the same with mirrorless cameras. If a DSLR accidentally hits an object in motion, a mirrorless camera accidentally misses. Last year I lived in a village where there were a lot of cats and taking a series of photos so focus is right in the eye of a moving cat, for the R6 and EF 100 2.8 USM macro is just another Tuesday.
This is such a geat and straight forward video. Im looking to buy this lens and just havent made up my mind if the extra money is worth it for the L series lens or not. Also you made me really hunry with the cooking portion of video! Your photography work is amazing!
missodessa Heyy thank you for reaching out. And Im definitely glad I offered some help here 😁
Great video! I own the 6D with 100mm 2.8 Macro USM and you can make magic with them.
Do you really always need a tripod with the older version?
Regarding the different focus points in the food photography video, it may be backfocusing. Had this issue with a lens I bought recently. You can correct for it in camera with new canon cameras.
Great review of 100mm Macro. I didn't want to stop watching. Excellent high-quality video production, also nice chicken linguine cooking lesson!
I'm glad you watched it till the end. I love to cook by the way.
I have both and I prefer the image quality out of the old one. Also, the L version is very weak in construction, very easy to brake.
I just bought a second hand 100 mm older version,, wish me luck 🙌
I've had one for years, and I love it. ( In fact I was using it yesterday on insects. ) When used with LIVE VIEW and a tripod, one can get razor sharp pix!
@@burkholdst.rudderberg3574 let this corona spare me and I'll use it more often
How was the lense my friend?? Im planning to get one like yours for a canon m50
Great video, I'm looking to upgrade to the L version from the old USM, this review was very helpful :) Looks like you need to do some AFMA adjustments with one of the lenses to take care of that problem with focusing - luckily the 6D Mk II has that feature built in!
Glad I offered help and know your feedback
Best
Why u plan to upgrade?
I'm having a 24-70 f2.8 n planning to have something with good Bokeh. So considering 85 1.8 as it fits d budget. But since it's not L series thinking to go for it or choose something else.. mainly for portriats
Great review on the 100 mm versions.. would love to know more about Product Photography
I had the old macro lens, sold it as it was almost unusable for pin sharp images without a tripod. I'm hoping to buy the new version with IS.
I intend to get the old version soon. I can’t afford the L version yet
Absolutely. I use it for headshots now, and I’m getting fantastic compressions
Thank you for your great work, getting the old one as I only need it for still photography on tripod/indoor use only, so can do without the weather seal and stabilization. : )
Thanks for the comparison!
Make Build Modify my pleasure mate! Have a great day
Loved the review, i was offered a 100 USM for exchange on my 70-200 f4 , with money back, i'm really tempted in doing the exchange.
But worried I might miss my 70-200.
Overall i use the 70-200 to shoot birds, but not that much, the 100mm seems to be more usefull to me (as i like to shoot macro too).
The mininum focus on the 70-200 is hard on me sometimes.
It's a hard discussion to make. What camera you have ? It would be an option to shoot birds with 100mm and make a slight crop later in post.
@@OmaGhomrawi I'm using a Canon XSI right now, 12mp cropped sensor.
Going to a mirrorless someday, mainly because of size, travel a lot and a full frame, full size, DLSR is just too big.
The deal went down, but the 100mm still is on my list!! for sure.
Thanks for making the video!
Definitely the latest lenses are better!
What do you think of Sony 90mm macro lens?
Which one do you like better quality, beauty, and AF?
Thanks for watching! I am currently making a video for Sony 90mm macro vs Tokina 100mm macro, which gonna be published in few weeks. However, Tokina is half the price and has decent image quality relatively close to Sony, but no image stabilization and slower auto focus. Stay Tuned!
@@OmaGhomrawi Really?
I can't wait for it to be uploaded!!
Even though it's expensive, I tend to buy good things, so I think I'll buy Sony!
EXCELLENT review! Definitely the best lens review I've ever seen - good job! I subscribed!
Good vid sir. I've been on the market for the 100mm macro so you helped me with my choice. Thanks!
Glad I offered help Miguel. All the best.
Wouldn’t using f16s and f32s introduce diffraction? Or does it go away if a flash is used?
Abhijith Dixith, eventually didn’t test that.
The light was diffracted even with flash.
do you prefer your current website template or your website template that you show above? what builder do you use to build them?:) i think your previous template looks dope!
Both designed made on wix.
I switched to new design 3 days ago by the way.
I am designer by the way so both designs made from scratch. I didn’t use a template
Great presentation in this video. For dental photography which lens do you suggest Old or New?
Both lenses suppose to work well. However, I do recommend the new lens as it has IS / Images Stabilization
salam Omar, great video man keep it up.. I want to ask about cameras, the 6D mark II is in the same price range of the Sony a7 III, which one you think is better in terms of overall image results ?
thank you
I bought a little Sony a6500 to see if I like Sony line of camera, and quality wise I think they both are good but its about the features for me. I can record vids, pictures and web cam all in one. So see what is best bang for you buck. I don't know if ill go full Sony since I already invested in canon though.
Depends. There are a lot of good adapter from canon to Sony so even when you are heavily invested in canon lenses you can still use them, for me just look at the features and go from that. But for me I’d go Sony just so I could try mirrorless lenses as well.
Great video, very informative! I am subscribed! Just one question, when it comes to portrait photography would you say the Canon 135mm 2.0 L Lens is superior to the 100mm 2.0 new version? Thanks!
Thank you for supporting the Channel Shaz. Honestly I didn't try 135m f2 yet
Great video, right to the point without a bunch of fluff.
Gotta love that 6d!
Love your videos! Very informative! Sending love from Hawaii! Mahalo!
That's soo nice Lethal. Glad to offer help.
I'm Lebanese myself living in Dubai. Have a great time mate.
I bought the Sigma 105mm 2.8 instead 👍
Awesome comparison! What screen recorder software do you use to record your edits in Lightroom
Hey Stewie, I use Quicktime on Mac.
hi very good video. I wonder about the older version of the 100mm macro how will it work on a crop? Won't it be too long or unusable for a portrait? I thought I would buy a classic 85 1.8 or 100 2.0 but I was fascinated by this macro
the 100mm will turn to 160mm on crop sensors. Indeed it works
@@OmaGhomrawi super thank you and can it be used as a telephoto lens for wildlife, for example?
@@MrRaduso 160cm is not ideal for wild life photography.
Great video! But the release date 2000 of the old version!
zeno fodor yes and new version is 2009 lol
This is what I was looking for man!! Thanks a lot!!! I will be buying the old one today. Hopefully it works well with the A7III and Sigma 11. I will let you know how it goes :)
I've seen the update. Great, it worked!
How is the autofocus ? is it slow ?
How is it going bro ?i want to take it i think
old Canon 100mm f2.8 USM Macro Lens
or sigma 105 2.8 macro ??
Never tried Sigma 105 2.8 macro. It's cheaper than Canon version but roughly 100grams heavier.
Try to check other reviews on youtube.
Best
رائع كالعاده .. أظن كده الأفضل أشتري الأقدم لتصوير الطعام والمنتجات وأوفر فلوس لعدسه تانيه مش شايف فرق واضح في تصوير الطعام والمنتجات .. ولا إيه رأيك
صحيح ما في فرق كبير في تصوير الطعام نفس النتيجة نورتنا
Oma Ghomrawi أنا داخل عالم الكانون جديد ياريت تنصحني بالعدسات الأفضل لتصوير الطعام من وجهة نظرك وإذا تكرمت أفضل سبيد لايت
@@success762 24-105mm f4 is the all in one food photography lens
Oma Ghomrawi will it be the same IQ as the primes?
The bright sun Prime lenses are usually sharper.
However, check my food photography on the website
95% shot with 24-105mm f4
Have anyone tried old version 100mm with ants?
is it necessary use tripod mount ring with Canon 100mm (no L IS version) ? Is it useable only mounted in ef mount? 600 grams is quite a lot
Tomáš Adamec hi Tomas, no need to you a mount ring the lens is not that heavyweight
@@OmaGhomrawi thank you
Enjoyed your post, I have the old 100 macro as well as well as these vintage: EF-L 28-70mm 2.8; EF-L 17-35; EF 75-300 4-5.6 IS & EF-L 70-200 2.8 which one should I keep or shall I sell it & get the new ones Thank you.
If Im in your shoes I sell all of them and get 24-105 f4 and 85mm f1.8
@@OmaGhomrawi Thank you, I just ordered 90 D, do you recommend a 50mm.?
@@OmaGhomrawi Also there are 2 models of 24-105 - new one with IS?
Just receive an email about delay in delivery of 90 D . Do you have another camera preference on that range?
@@junkokinoko7277 I never tried the non IS version.
Great explanation. I found you video very helpful.
My pleasure
thanks so much! :D i wish you have a nice year!
Thank you for watching Oliver, Have a great time :)
thanks you for this awesome review, well done, keep going :)
Bigbrank thank you for your support mate. You’re welcome
very nice introduction to both lens give me all information about what will happen on video amazing
Glad to know Wasin, You're welcome mate
Love you voice man ...it’s unique...great work
Thank you for watching mate. You're welcome :D
which plugin u use for canon RAW in Lightroom?
I don't use plugins
At the moment I'm using 24-105mm F4L with reverse macro mount. Really hard to get the perfect focus, because it is fully manually. Since I already have L lens, I'm thinking hard on the 2.8L. But a friend says I should just go with the non-L. What do you recommend?
Hey Villiam, As I tested both L and non L last year, I almost remember they hold the same image quality, while the non L is more sensitive to lens flare. If you're shooting macro on a tripod or have enough light, the non L is a good option though.
If you're doing macro for fun, Save yourself some money and attach your extension tubes to a 50mm lens.
Check this one ruclips.net/video/u-xWMPYPI7I/видео.html
I've watched this video ruclips.net/video/fT1fcwMu8jY/видео.html couple months ago, and bought Canon FD NEW 28mm f2.8 (40 years old lens) to try macro on macro like the video addressed. Unfortunately, the focus area is very narrow same as I'm using extension tubes.
Thank you so much
A lens hood would have solved the flair problem when shooting portraits.
Indeed it does help. Eventually if the lens is built to bounce light inside the glass, lens hood wouldnt help that much.
Tried to put my hand to block the sun and doesn't help that much
This video was so useful. Thank you so much! I am definitely subscribing :)
Hey Stipi! You're welcome. Have a great time mate
great video Oma very helpfull.. from your video I think the usm will do for me..
Yana Hardianaya Soehardi , thanks for watching mate. Best of luck
Thank you
Nice one was confused on buying
Great review! Thanks!
Thank you for watching Ivan
Thanks Oma!! Great video!'n
Buen video hermano!! me sirvio de mucho
So, non L version of 100mm is still sharp enough for 2020?
Eventually it's your call, I try to show you the difference and you choose the one you find better
not 1990, 2000, that is the non USM version.
Thats not old vs new, its cheap (non L) vs more expensive but totally worth it if you use it often.
Would you say to buy a mark 1 24-70mm OR a mark1 100mm?
24-70 is more versatile but doesn't do macro as far as I know. so it depends on what you need from the lens.
@@OmaGhomrawi more so for event photography and action shots id say
RetributionFX I believe 24-70 is a better option though
Great Video Oma Sir
Thank you for watching Emil!
Hi Oma. What macro lens would you recommend for food video/vlogging. I really can't decide which one to use. Anyone ?
A. Giordano what camera fo you have ?
@@OmaGhomrawi Canon 90D and Canon M50. Can you tell me what macro lens suits for each camera ? Thanks !
A. Giordano there is no macro lens that can do all the food , video and vlogging.
Im not expert in APSC canon cameras. But try to find a zoom lens starts from wide to medium or long telephoto
@@OmaGhomrawi I see. What macro lens should I buy then if I am into food videography only ?
@@a.giordano134 Many canon apsc users like to grab Sigma 18-35mm F1.8 DC HSM Art Lens
hi do you have a video about 24-105 L for food photo / videography ? thxsssssss
Unfortunately no. However, 90% of my food photography done with Canon 24-105 f4
Check them out at www.omarghomrawi.com/Photography
Check this one as well:
Sony 70-200mm f/4 G is Now my FOOD Photography LENS ruclips.net/video/shcIDTiiCGk/видео.html
Very nice review. You got a new suscriber 👍🏼
My pleasure mate. Thank you for subscribing, it means a lot to me.
thank you bro
My pleasure mate
< درسني دكتور بجدة .. سامي غمراوي .. والا تشابه القاب فقط .. عموما مشكور اخ عمر .. بس ياليت في شرح بالعربي
مرحبا شكرا عتواصلك، لم يسبق لي ان تعرف عليه.
محتوى القناة بالإنكليزي وكان هذا القرار منذ البداية اولا لتصل المعلومه لكل فئات البشر ولا املك الوقت الكافي لانشاء محتوى عربي من ناحية اخرى
This is a very poor test of sharpness. To see the difference you need to photograph the same subject then blow up the images on a computer screen. If he had done that he would have seen superiority of L version.
And what about sharpness at 1:2 and 1:1? He does not test for sharpness at magnifications for which most photographers buy such a lens. You need to photograph something tiny with lots of minute barely visible detail and then blow up the results. No one ever does that in these lens test vids.
Yea he brushed past the details which is the point of this lens 🤦🏾♂️🤣
What do you mean by camera digital IS? The 6D doesn’t have IBIS. Thanks.
Indeed 6dm2 has no IBIS but it has digital stabilization for Video ONLY.
Thanks for explaining. I never knew that. I guess it's the same kind of thing as in Final Cut Pro etc.
kipling1957 it also crops a bit when DIGITAL IS is on, and crops more when (the advanced IS mode if not mistaken) is active
Thanks. I'm using the new version on a C100 mkII as I'm basically into video. Planning to get a second camera for B-roll which is why I was aking about the 600D. I'll probably jump for the 80D to keep the same crop factor as many of my lenses are EF-S.
Indeed c100 is perfect for videos. I switched to Sony system, and have sold all my canon gear 6 months ago. Im pretty happy with the new system.
I own a full frame camera A7 iii and a6500 apcs camera as well. I do both videos and photography, feeling satisfied with both cams.
does the canon non L macro auto focus well with the A7 iii? using mc-11?
yui yoshioka i tried it with metabones 4 and didn’t focus at all
Just bought the 100 mm non L lens today and AF works great on the A7III with Sigma MC 11.
@@theprolightingindia Sounds great. I tested it on metabones, Never try it with mc11.
great job on the video!!
Thanks Ben, have a great time
Can I use it with eos 1300 D ?!
Indeed. can use it with any canon dslr camera
will this fit the canon t5?
Definitely it does work on any canon eos mount.
However, gonna perform as 160mm on APC-S cameras instead of 100mm
The L lens is just too expensive. I can't justify paying so much. I can get a good regular second hand lens for $300 on ebay
myown113ify that’s the purpose of my videos. I show you the difference and you pick up the best suits you
myown113ify igot mine from japan nearly new for $230
@@LynnTran sounds great
The older one seems much sharper.
Love your presentation. Very straightforward and informative! Thanks!
Pleasure Joel :)
Glad to know your feedback. Did you watch other videos on my channel?
yep! Slowing watching the rest. Cheers!
Bro can you focus more on food photography? I'd be an everyday watcher!
Hey Gio. I love doing food photography and would expand these videos in the future.
Oma Ghomrawi Hope you do so. :) And hope you stick to that niche lol
Filming myself making Food Photography is quite hard. Think my wife should help me with that lol
Well Done
iso 8000 wow
shit bro, tomorrow im going to Best Buy and im getting that lense
Luk3W which one ? IS or non IS
Oma Ghomrawi IS
This is not a review!!
Зверский обзор, спасибо!
Glad to know your feedback mate
Ta
24-105/4 is one of 2 the worst Canon zoom lenses ever
Predrag Milosavljevic oh why
Great video Oma, I was looking at the new 100mm macro for some insect work as Canon Live Chat ( bit.ly/2Y6IbTY )were saying it was probably my best bet, your video has helped decide it as well, thanks!!! Do you think for things like ants this is probably a better option than a shorter focal length (60mm?)
Hi! I never tried the 60mm macro lens yet. I was very happy with the 100, are you willing to shoot insect ? better to get the IS version though
@@OmaGhomrawi yeah I was thinking for insects, I agree IS version is definitely the way to go unless I can get the insects to pose in front of a tripod haha!
2022: $1,299.
old is gold!
you talk to fast
unfortunately. That was fixed in the other videos
You can put the speed on the video on slower speed :)