Two years ago, the artillery exercises in northern germany, caused a week long fire in a peat field. Good that Bavaria doesn't have such fields anymore, only dried woods.
@@SkipperAnimations It’s 100+ PzH-2000 together with MLRS and all the other army group units. We run out of shells before we run out of howitzers. And yes, it will take two years to produce more like with every other weapon system. You don’t want to live to see a war during which NATO is forced to produce more weapons.
@@ottoreitstock2465 Germany sent 10, the Netherlands sent 8, thus 18 in total are in Ukraine. Ukraine also will receive 100 newly built PzH 2000, but producing 100 of them will take several years.
@@generalkunta4705 that’s different. You can’t change the will of people. Their own forces were were not willing to fight. USA can’t stay forever. But their leader quit. This is the same war Russia is trying to fight. But Ukrainians will never accept Russia government in their land. Same situation
This is why is nice to have Germany on your side, Putler will be tasting how the soviets were suffering Under German Army, but Germany 🇩🇪 is our ally now 👊👊🇺🇦🇩🇪🇺🇦🇩🇪🇺🇦🇩🇪👍
More like you are blessed to have USA 🇺🇸 on your side. Germans laughed at the USA administration when they told them Russian gas dangerous and not meeting the NATO military spending commitment is very dangerous! Who is looking like a complete idiot now? USA has to come a protect Europe yet again. You can hate all you want but USA is a superpower that no one could mess with at any given time.
@@mikael2113 Lift as in effort , work . They were at the Elbe river before we were in Berlin , and they stayed there till 1990 . 200 miles from Holland and France .
Now, this is more like it!! Germany were always good at artillery (Krupps, WW1 & 2) so it's no real surprise that this is the most powerful howitzer out there. What's needed, though, is more of them!! That really would give the Russians something to think about. Roll out the Panzers!!!
Exactly! We need much more of them 2000 would be a good number. Germany once had more than 5000 armored vehicles. Now the Bundeswehr is not capable to fight a war. Germany has cut the Bundeswehr to the bone. It is good that they are investing now 100 billion to get it back to service again.
If Germany have had 1000 of pzh 2000 their neighbours get in panic mode! It's still because of ww2! Give them free hand for building weapons and russian would never dare to attack Europe or Ukraine! German engineering is known as one of best in history!
@@roastntoast7550 Did Germany invent satellites and space flight? has Germany got hypersonic missiles? 5th generation fighters? can German anti air systems shoot multiple small targets at the same time? Just to expand on that last point,Ukraine fired a volley of 12 of the latest wunderwaffe,the HIMARS at a bridge and yes cause some damage,a day later another 12 shot volley was completely intercepted by a s 400 anti air system.
So happy NATO is here. Imagine how much panic there would be in every european country to setup its defences knowing the current russia expansion hunger. Lets stay UNITED and stop this agressor!
@@MooseMeus they're not defending anything...they're just repeating all the previous occupations they pursued over the past few decades. This will turn out costly for them.
The American backed regime change in Ukraine triggered the expansion by Russia. Not saying Nato is important for places like Poland but I think a bit of perspective is needed.
Forces news Question ? there are more artillery that fire 155MM rounds. Also Howitzers from America, French's Cesar, so why is this labeled as the most powerful howitzer? The reason it is on top of the list is not because its rounds are heavier or stronger, but because its accurate, it can shoot fast, only needs small crew and can reload its entire stock fast.
CAESAR can notably accurately strike targets more than 40 kilometres (25 mi) away using Base Bleed ERFB ammunition or targets over 55 kilometres (34 mi) away using rocket assisted or smart ammunition
That‘s basically what pretty much all modern NATO self-propelled howitzers can do, it depends mainly on the used ammunition. The PzH 2000 achieved 66.943 meters with Assegai M2005-V-LAP ammunition during firing trials in 2019.
Not sure whether this German made 2000 howitzer or the G6 RHino howitzer is better in range and accuracy but what I do know is that the G6 can move and change positions much faster ....
We need a training exercise similar to what happened in the 1980's involving thousands and thousands of troops from all countries to see how effectively we can bring all our capabilities together and to see how well they can effectively coordinate.
You should read up on exercises the US did for a theoretical war with China. The first run resulted in US defeat. The exercise was rerun with the "Chinese" force not allowed to sink ships or shoot down planes. That's the only war NATO wins,one where the enemy kindly agrees not to fight too hard.
@@Surv1ve_Thrive They have not, don't trust the things you see on RUclips. On the 22 of July a state official had to go out and say there is no Archers in Ukraine.
@@piotrproszewski3977 True, no MBT, but AA-Tanks and AA-Missle Systems (IRIS-T) soon. This war will drag on ... and air defense is important, too. Besides, Ukraine "purchased" 100 PZH-2000 yesterday.
@@thomasselle1110 Germany and France play waite game...imagine if they also give ukraine 500 tank and 250 howitzer...war will be over soon. They just talking,we dont have them, it takes time,blah blah blah...They one of the biggest weapon producent in World! Far richer then Poland...war is time when it dont matter what you say or promissed,only matter is what you do. And they do as little as they can
@@piotrproszewski3977 You're right, it is as you say, and yet, I cannot do anything about it. Germany and France politicians are scared of Putin, scared of Russia. However, in the end, and I'm absolutely positive, they will deliver significant heavy weapons and I hope, it is going to make a huge difference! Putin should go to hell, the only place he deserves to be. Poland supports Ukraine admirably, no doubt about that. Orban in Hungary on the opposite side is a pain in the ass. I dearly hope, Ukraine can repel Russia's attacks and reclaim at least the southern territories (Kherson oblast) and never ever lose Odesa Oblast!!!
One can see that NATO has indeed proved its artillery in Ukraine , linked in with their 24/7 Spies in the sky , allowing the 155s and HYMARS to pin point and hit key targets with greater accuracy and at longer range has shown that the Russians have no reply and for sure NATO will now review the Russian main tactic of heavy use of artillery and make improvements on their own advanced counter fire capabilities !
The First SPG Pzh2000 can have a minimum Crew of 3 men to use. Comprised of Gunner Commander Driver. Gunner has to manually load the 15.5cm shell charge and then fire the Pzh 2000. This base was also used to Train Ukrainian Army soldiers to use US Military equipment
@@michaelmulligan0 I've heard the Russians are firing 10x the artillery shell a day, that may be propaganda but if true its clear the Ukrainians are being more effective with their units.
That prissy ass 155mm has a high rate of fire, way better firecontrol, doesnt just hold 4 rounds, can move after firing, can make a 3 round burst hit the target at the same time. All that while being more accurate, having a higher range and being nuclear capable.
the u.s. had the m110 also known as the 8 inch, it was a 203 mm gun that was so big it just sat on top of a open tracked chasse! It was also the most accurate field artillery piece but it was retired in the 90s because it was just too big and too slow. Also we where able to make a 155mm tactical nuclear round for the m198 and m109 so we didn't need the 203mm m110 (the 8") anymore. Its big role was to be in Germany and Korea with nuclear capability!
Yeah, Britain operated them until the 90’s but as precision guided munitions came into service, the M110’s bunker busting role could be done more effectively with guided munitions and we also phased out our 203mm nuclear shells in the early 90’s
Those retired m110 and ammunition can be send to Ukraine, if former operators didn't destroy all the ammo. The problem would the firing range that falls short compared to the old Pion that Ukr army are still using.
The world's most powerful self-propelled howitzer, or driveable long-range gun is the Soviet-era S27 Pion which is being used in the Ukraine by the Orcs. The Pion fires a 203 mm shell in excess of 100 kgs which far exceeds the size and power of a 155 mm shell.
The panzerhaubitze 2000 is, like he said in the video, a 155mm gun. How could that be the most powerful if things like the 2S7 pion exist, which is a 203mm?
Most powerful, try the South African G 6, up to 67 klms; The G6-52: The 2 ballistic options Feature Barrel Length Chamber volume Projectiles Charges MV at Std Pressure at Std MV Max Setback G’s Range Base Bleed Range HE-VLAP Projectile mass Zone 2 JBMOU G6-52 52 cal 23 l Assegai M2000 M90 series 950 m/s 335 MPa 985 m/s 18 000 42 km 55 km 42,6 kg Ext range G6-52L 52 cal 25 l Improved ERFB M9 M64 series 1015 m/s 420 MPa 1050 m/s 20 000 50km 67 km 45,2 kg
Can the Pion fire a three round burst that hits the target at the same time? The Pion only has 4 shells and reloads pretty slowly. Powerful is more than just a big caliber.o
@@d3203 No that just means it's more efficient. If your asking the question which is more powerful the bigger gun on the Pion is definitely more powerful.
@@TheLastNeville no, being more efficient means being more powerfull. One 204mm definetly is less powerfull than 3-5 155mm by the same gun hitting the target at the same time.
@@d3203 That is more effective. Which the panzer definitely is. But the gun on the Pion is still more powerful. It's all just wording. A .50 caliber bolt-action isn't more powerful than a 7.62 DMR.
Brexit was nothing to do with not liking Europe,it was about not having unelected people that have no connection with British people,making laws and rules for us. Its not Europe we dislike,its only the EU
The so called "West" was undermined by Trump and Johnson/Brexit. Of course Brexit had an impact. THE GB Foreign Minister - Mr Hunt described the EU as soviet Union. The British and US are no close allies anymore. May be in a few months Trump is back...unfortunately. We in Germany have to organize with our closest friends only.
@@minimax9452 Germany just uses the rest of the EU,like how you're making every country use less gas this winter because you're so dependent on Russia, why should the rest of the EU suffer just because of your mistakes?
@@makeasylumsgreatagain864 Others hav 50 year old nuclear-plants on other border like France and beligum. Now they want to prolong even the oldest power plants for decades.....when one blows up....you can also say "told you so"
All in all, however, it looks as if Nato will have to catch up on "tactical nuclear" rounds in huge quantity now, so as to counter the Russian threat on that level. Also, since the neo-fascist parasitic Putin regime now gave precedence, overall military and specifically strategic nuclear capability is once again going to suck up effort and money in Cold War II, but this time, Nato must unite in absolute readiness to use nuclear weapons in small scale as well as MAD scale. Welcome to the MADness that is humanity.
No they really shouldn't. Russia would've lost the war, Ukraine and its own foreseeable future if the decide to use their arsenal in any extend. They have virtually non existent legitimization for invading a neighbouring country by annihilating anything that is visible. Just throwing a nuclear bomb because your cannon fudder turned suicidal, is not an option. The ramifications will eliminate Russia from a viable future. It's one thing to have them, it's a great deterrent, using them is not an option.
There is no need for tactical nukes. It's better to not even have them and just maintain strategic MAD nukes. If the Russians want to use tactical nukes, they should know the only response will be strategic MAD nukes. Maintaining tactical nukes will give the Russians the idea that they can use nukes and get away with it.
Actually the Swedish Archer Howitzer and this German Howitzer are about the same in most respects. Nothing if anything to choose between them. One things for sure, you wouldn't want to be the receiving end of either one!
Come to Ukraine and train on a real targets...we have enought
We love to but nato won’t let us
@@davidbevan8402 Damn..thats is ammo wasting 😒
Hope they do and you can kill many Russian Nazi Orcs
😂
It won’t be long now and Ukrainian will start the fight back to regain the territory that was taken from them
Two years ago, the artillery exercises in northern germany, caused a week long fire in a peat field. Good that Bavaria doesn't have such fields anymore, only dried woods.
The Germans really are first class……superb platforms and excellent guns…..🇬🇧
Well their numbers is pretty low. Germany itself has only
@@SkipperAnimations It’s 100+ PzH-2000 together with MLRS and all the other army group units. We run out of shells before we run out of howitzers. And yes, it will take two years to produce more like with every other weapon system. You don’t want to live to see a war during which NATO is forced to produce more weapons.
@@SkipperAnimations over 100 pzh you expert
The Germans should provide more PzH 2000 to Ukraine! They gave or sold just a few of them.
@@ottoreitstock2465
Germany sent 10, the Netherlands sent 8, thus 18 in total are in Ukraine.
Ukraine also will receive 100 newly built PzH 2000, but producing 100 of them will take several years.
I believe no country will go head to head against NATO. Strongest military alliance in the world. Go NATO!
Taliban did. They threw em out of their country. 🇷🇺🇷🇺
@@generalkunta4705 that’s different. You can’t change the will of people. Their own forces were were not willing to fight. USA can’t stay forever. But their leader quit. This is the same war Russia is trying to fight. But Ukrainians will never accept Russia government in their land. Same situation
@@generalkunta4705 Neither did USSR
@@davidh9820 Yep, invested and trained yet the opium addicts just let them ride in.
@@davidh9820 no it’s really not
I hope they got to grab some Bavarian beer while in the area! I love Bavarian doppelbock!
Once a Gunner always a Gunner
Ubique.
With all The BS most off the the person putting their input are devenitely are no Gunners
@@gottfriedwrede1707 And you definitely do not a have a grasp of the English language.
@@alonsocushing2263 Must I? i am not an English speaker and that is not important to me
@@gottfriedwrede1707 If you are going to post in English, then perhaps you need a better understanding of the language.
it's a shame the old M-107 175mm isn't around anymore, I think the AFU would really enjoy those. Слава Герою!!!
NATO is the closest it has ever been since it was created, bravo fellas.
I wish I had friends like Germany
❤️Ukrainian 🇬🇪
25 miles is crazy. It’s like sending a ball from one side of Manchester to the other and being able to put it in a bin.
You should look up what happened to the guy that invented the base bleed shell.
with some ammo it can 40 miles.
This is why is nice to have Germany on your side, Putler will be tasting how the soviets were suffering Under German Army, but Germany 🇩🇪 is our ally now
👊👊🇺🇦🇩🇪🇺🇦🇩🇪🇺🇦🇩🇪👍
You know the Ivans did 80% of the lift in WW11 ?
@@laurencesmith2199 by "lift" you mean deaths or in russian/soviet words casualties?
More like you are blessed to have USA 🇺🇸 on your side. Germans laughed at the USA administration when they told them Russian gas dangerous and not meeting the NATO military spending commitment is very dangerous! Who is looking like a complete idiot now? USA has to come a protect Europe yet again. You can hate all you want but USA is a superpower that no one could mess with at any given time.
@@mikael2113
Lift as in effort , work . They were at the Elbe river before we were in Berlin , and they stayed there till 1990 . 200 miles from Holland and France .
Who would trust the German Nation ?
Thanks!
We love and support you
Now, this is more like it!!
Germany were always good at artillery (Krupps, WW1 & 2) so it's no real surprise that this is the most powerful howitzer out there.
What's needed, though, is more of them!! That really would give the Russians something to think about. Roll out the Panzers!!!
Exactly! We need much more of them 2000 would be a good number. Germany once had more than 5000 armored vehicles. Now the Bundeswehr is not capable to fight a war. Germany has cut the Bundeswehr to the bone. It is good that they are investing now 100 billion to get it back to service again.
Possibly but Germany has less than 150 artillery/MLRS pieces.
If Germany have had 1000 of pzh 2000 their neighbours get in panic mode! It's still because of ww2! Give them free hand for building weapons and russian would never dare to attack Europe or Ukraine! German engineering is known as one of best in history!
@@roastntoast7550 Did Germany invent satellites and space flight? has Germany got hypersonic missiles? 5th generation fighters? can German anti air systems shoot multiple small targets at the same time? Just to expand on that last point,Ukraine fired a volley of 12 of the latest wunderwaffe,the HIMARS at a bridge and yes cause some damage,a day later another 12 shot volley was completely intercepted by a s 400 anti air system.
Sorr - no. Everybody wanted us weak as possible now you want us strong and aggressive for your behalf - we have to follow our interests.
AMEN 🙏
Looking at the amount of military aircraft on the radar websites I 'm guessing there's quite a few military exercises occuring right now.
🤡🤡🤡
That is one hell of a self propelled howitzer 🍑
Training is great but spanking live ammo in such numbers is madness.
Send em lol along with the CEASARS, 777’s, HIMARS, AMMARS, and STUGNA P
So happy NATO is here. Imagine how much panic there would be in every european country to setup its defences knowing the current russia expansion hunger. Lets stay UNITED and stop this agressor!
russia is just trying to save their naval bases. they are not trying to expand into NATO. They wouldn't be able to anyway.
@@MooseMeus Bull!!
Tell that to Macron who is deliberately trying divide Nato members
@@MooseMeus they're not defending anything...they're just repeating all the previous occupations they pursued over the past few decades.
This will turn out costly for them.
The American backed regime change in Ukraine triggered the expansion by Russia. Not saying Nato is important for places like Poland but I think a bit of perspective is needed.
Forces news Question ? there are more artillery that fire 155MM rounds.
Also Howitzers from America, French's Cesar, so why is this labeled as the most powerful howitzer?
The reason it is on top of the list is not because its rounds are heavier or stronger, but because its accurate, it can shoot fast, only needs small crew and can reload its entire stock fast.
0:29 *Supplied by The Netherlands but sendt and build in/ by Germany.
@JR M supplied by netherlands AND germany (and i thinks by italy), Training provided by germany.
Did the Brigadier forget to put his teeth in?
Most powerfull self-propelled howitzer is 2S7 Pion with 11 meters gun it fires 203mm shells weighing 100kg each
CAESAR can notably accurately strike targets more than 40 kilometres (25 mi) away using Base Bleed ERFB ammunition or targets over 55 kilometres (34 mi) away using rocket assisted or smart ammunition
That‘s basically what pretty much all modern NATO self-propelled howitzers can do, it depends mainly on the used ammunition.
The PzH 2000 achieved 66.943 meters with Assegai M2005-V-LAP ammunition during firing trials in 2019.
GOOD TO SEE GERMANY IS STEPPING UP!!👏👏👏👏👏👏👏 Ukraine push the Russian back home
It will be perfect if speed of fire rate are 20-30 grenades per minute and of course automatic fast reload but that we will not see for few decades
what about Barrel replacement and Spare Barrels???
@@gottfriedwrede1707 you will must have one truck with that parts near but you must have it with this ones too but materials are not so gr
Germany's Panzer Haubitzer 2000 & polish AHS Krab howitzers are the best
Even the krab has tons of german engineering parts in it! For example the MTU engine, barrel and so on...
The Abrams tank has german barrel as well...
It is good to know that PzH 2000, Krab, M 109 and Cesars are working in the same team. Bad for the receiving end!
Russian military won't cross this line NATO 👍
Ben Wallace saying to today the UK will end up being an eighth rate power in Europe in the next eight years is sobering.
8th biggest spender not power, other nations are just ramping up due to under spend for decades whereas we've kept an almost constant 2% gdp
Last Graf...1986! Have fun kids! 😂😂😂😂👍👍🤘🤘
That the Americans still have ground in Germany says much
Thanks but I’ll take the French Caesar system instead.
Not sure whether this German made 2000 howitzer or the G6 RHino howitzer is better in range and accuracy but what I do know is that the G6 can move and change positions much faster ....
On road only .....
@@minimax9452 Actually can do off road as well.
That is true tell the armchair specialists
We need a training exercise similar to what happened in the 1980's involving thousands and thousands of troops from all countries to see how effectively we can bring all our capabilities together and to see how well they can effectively coordinate.
Able archer?
They do that. trident juncture in 2018 50,000 men, defender Europe 2021, 30,000 men, cold response 2022 30,000.
@@niccibrown2140 nope able crasher
@@niccibrown2140 Yes, able Archer was the last one
You should read up on exercises the US did for a theoretical war with China. The first run resulted in US defeat. The exercise was rerun with the "Chinese" force not allowed to sink ships or shoot down planes. That's the only war NATO wins,one where the enemy kindly agrees not to fight too hard.
Slava Ukraine🇺🇦🇺🇦🇮🇩🇮🇩indonesia
@2:31 "the British led Allied Rapid Reaction Corps" ... although that looks like an F15 ?
Nice dump truck brah
The best army’s in the world ☠️♠️👍❤️🇺🇸
Ucrania es un campo perfecto para probar nuevo armamento.✌
But the "Pion" a tracked and mobile CCCP sistem with 203 mm. Caliber, have more range and load. So isn't the "biggest" the pnz2000.
Powerfull=/=biggest.
Now is the time to prepare for the next round against the Russians
Not only Germany the Netherlands also donated this system
That's a big mean mama!
Artillery. Yes lesson learned from Russian invasion of Ukraine.
1:06 name of this system???
I wish we could send Ukraine a few Archers, then we would see how they will do in real combat.
Didn’t Sweden 🇸🇪 send Archers to Ukraine? 🇺🇦
They have them.
@@Surv1ve_Thrive They have not, don't trust the things you see on RUclips. On the 22 of July a state official had to go out and say there is no Archers in Ukraine.
Pftt the last time the Germans went for big and long range, they needed a train carriage to mount it on!
When did this happen? 80-90 years ago? Times and artillery have changed.
@@gluteusmaximus1657 It was tongue in cheek mate... Jesus.
@@Beefy5039 Please do not draw the carpenters son into long range artillery! ;-)
@@gluteusmaximus1657 isn't that how dropshorts conduct their business, please jebus, make these calculations correct?
South African G6 System is shooting at a greater Distance and moves faster
nope
MILARS aka the grid square removal service
I wish i could turn my body clock back. Ah well.
Drones and artillery combined causes massive suffering very sad both sides are losing people
It is however, a result of war.
Apparently we've not learned much.
@@Snaakie83 very true
Wer hat es gebaut? Richtig,der Deutsche.
Dont mess with this europe (NATO) from 2022
I only served a few year, so how do I become a expert like you armchair warriors ?
You OK but this Chaps not even playing War games
Polish krab is also 155 kaliber, and had longer range, up to 30km... what makes this howitzer more powerfull? Made in germany?
Nope! Just the specs! Anyways ... why do you ask ... allies don't care.
@@thomasselle1110 and zero tank
@@piotrproszewski3977 True, no MBT, but AA-Tanks and AA-Missle Systems (IRIS-T) soon. This war will drag on ... and air defense is important, too. Besides, Ukraine "purchased" 100 PZH-2000 yesterday.
@@thomasselle1110 Germany and France play waite game...imagine if they also give ukraine 500 tank and 250 howitzer...war will be over soon. They just talking,we dont have them, it takes time,blah blah blah...They one of the biggest weapon producent in World! Far richer then Poland...war is time when it dont matter what you say or promissed,only matter is what you do. And they do as little as they can
@@piotrproszewski3977 You're right, it is as you say, and yet, I cannot do anything about it. Germany and France politicians are scared of Putin, scared of Russia. However, in the end, and I'm absolutely positive, they will deliver significant heavy weapons and I hope, it is going to make a huge difference! Putin should go to hell, the only place he deserves to be. Poland supports Ukraine admirably, no doubt about that. Orban in Hungary on the opposite side is a pain in the ass. I dearly hope, Ukraine can repel Russia's attacks and reclaim at least the southern territories (Kherson oblast) and never ever lose Odesa Oblast!!!
One can see that NATO has indeed proved its artillery in Ukraine , linked in with their 24/7 Spies in the sky , allowing the 155s and HYMARS to pin point and hit key targets with greater accuracy and at longer range has shown that the Russians have no reply and for sure NATO will now review the Russian main tactic of heavy use of artillery and make improvements on their own advanced counter fire capabilities !
Ok bv
The First SPG Pzh2000 can have a minimum Crew of 3 men to use. Comprised of Gunner Commander Driver. Gunner has to manually load the 15.5cm shell charge and then fire the Pzh 2000. This base was also used to Train Ukrainian Army soldiers to use US Military equipment
BS
Viva Ukraine
Not the time for fashionable Bush hats, Madam!
💙💛
"Most powerful"??? How exactly is that determined? What about the SK K9 or US paladin?
Longest range of all howitzer and still most accurate of them all
Multi Round Simultaneous Impact is why, only a handful of artillery pieces can do it and the FbH 2000 excels at it.
1:05 is that russians?
Aren't we getting rid of our AS90's? Maybe we should buy some German units or maybe some M109A7's?
55 artillery pieces from all of NATO?
That’s less than 3 regiments….. a Russian Bde has approx that
Yet the Russians aren't having good results with their superior number of artillery units.
@@Victor-vj5ds because the Ukrainians employ equal numbers (and now some superior systems)
@@michaelmulligan0 I've heard the Russians are firing 10x the artillery shell a day, that may be propaganda but if true its clear the Ukrainians are being more effective with their units.
How is it the world's most powerful when the Russians have the 203mm 2S7 PION self propelled howitzer
Because it beats the PION.
Russia has the most powerful 205mm SPG
Still not a Ghattling Howitzer. Russia may have one. Maybe China.
Idk them Russian 203’s are nuclear capable idk about them prissy ass 155mm probably has a higher fire rate I guess 🤷🏻♂️
That prissy ass 155mm has a high rate of fire, way better firecontrol, doesnt just hold 4 rounds, can move after firing, can make a 3 round burst hit the target at the same time. All that while being more accurate, having a higher range and being nuclear capable.
Higher fire rate and capable of MRSI so far more destructive against targets.
the u.s. had the m110 also known as the 8 inch, it was a 203 mm gun that was so big it just sat on top of a open tracked chasse! It was also the most accurate field artillery piece but it was retired in the 90s because it was just too big and too slow. Also we where able to make a 155mm tactical nuclear round for the m198 and m109 so we didn't need the 203mm m110 (the 8") anymore. Its big role was to be in Germany and Korea with nuclear capability!
Yeah, Britain operated them until the 90’s but as precision guided munitions came into service, the M110’s bunker busting role could be done more effectively with guided munitions and we also phased out our 203mm nuclear shells in the early 90’s
Greece has them in the islands to crush any bridhead. Since are very powerful.
Germany also had the M110 in addition to the M109 and towed FH70 during the Cold War.
Those retired m110 and ammunition can be send to Ukraine, if former operators didn't destroy all the ammo. The problem would the firing range that falls short compared to the old Pion that Ukr army are still using.
Are You a trained Fire Observing Officer and trained in gunnery
When someone praise himself then something Is fishy
Germany has only 108 PzH 20000 of the ordered 185 left!! Because of reduction the last 25 years they can't defend themselves anymore!!
OUPS!krupps WW2...Good camps.
The world's most powerful self-propelled howitzer, or driveable long-range gun is the Soviet-era S27 Pion which is being used in the Ukraine by the Orcs.
The Pion fires a 203 mm shell in excess of 100 kgs which far exceeds the size and power of a 155 mm shell.
the 155 mm shell will at least hit where intended and not far off target
But it's nowhere near as accurate as the NATO
@@luciussander8217 It was NOT designed to be accurate but instead to destroy cities.
@@luciussander8217 more accurate
The Phz2000 can fire 5 - 155mm shells within 1 min and let them explode at the same time on the same target.
Its absolutely NOT the most powerful self propelled artillery
Which one is the most powerful then?
It objectively is.
The panzerhaubitze 2000 is, like he said in the video, a 155mm gun. How could that be the most powerful if things like the 2S7 pion exist, which is a 203mm?
@@Ranyick That doesn't matter, with the higher fire rate and better accuracy the PZH 2000 can deliver way more pain, despite the lower caliber.
@@Freedom9X then it’s still not the most powerful
💪❤️ NATO1
We are all Ukrainians! We pray to God for the victory of the Ukranian Army Heroes against the Russian agressor! Ukraine ever and forever!
I am not. Also an atheist. sorry.
Most powerful, try the South African G 6, up to 67 klms; The G6-52: The 2 ballistic options
Feature
Barrel Length
Chamber volume
Projectiles
Charges
MV at Std
Pressure at Std
MV Max
Setback G’s
Range Base Bleed
Range HE-VLAP
Projectile mass Zone 2
JBMOU G6-52
52 cal
23 l
Assegai M2000
M90 series
950 m/s
335 MPa
985 m/s
18 000
42 km
55 km
42,6 kg
Ext range G6-52L
52 cal
25 l
Improved ERFB M9
M64 series
1015 m/s
420 MPa
1050 m/s
20 000
50km
67 km
45,2 kg
With special ammunition the panzerhaubitze 2000 can reach 67km
Not bad at all, but just not as highly automated. Manual reload.
PzH 2000 - "world most powerful SPG"... Msta-S, Pion/Malka, Koaltisiya: LoL
I think the 2S7 Pion is much more powerful than the Panzer-H... Watching footage of that thing fire is rediculous.
Pion and other 8" Guns havent handloading. Its the reason, why 6" cannons were deweloping now
Can the Pion fire a three round burst that hits the target at the same time? The Pion only has 4 shells and reloads pretty slowly. Powerful is more than just a big caliber.o
@@d3203 No that just means it's more efficient. If your asking the question which is more powerful the bigger gun on the Pion is definitely more powerful.
@@TheLastNeville no, being more efficient means being more powerfull. One 204mm definetly is less powerfull than 3-5 155mm by the same gun hitting the target at the same time.
@@d3203 That is more effective. Which the panzer definitely is. But the gun on the Pion is still more powerful. It's all just wording. A .50 caliber bolt-action isn't more powerful than a 7.62 DMR.
How do you claim this is the most powerful? There are 203mm self propelled guns.
Probably means the most effective one.
When we're at war as Europeans we come together and co-operate openly and easily with our European allies, but when things are going fine we Brexit.
It’s like america …
Brexit was nothing to do with not liking Europe,it was about not having unelected people that have no connection with British people,making laws and rules for us. Its not Europe we dislike,its only the EU
The so called "West" was undermined by Trump and Johnson/Brexit. Of course Brexit had an impact. THE GB Foreign Minister - Mr Hunt described the EU as soviet Union. The British and US are no close allies anymore. May be in a few months Trump is back...unfortunately. We in Germany have to organize with our closest friends only.
@@minimax9452 Germany just uses the rest of the EU,like how you're making every country use less gas this winter because you're so dependent on Russia, why should the rest of the EU suffer just because of your mistakes?
@@makeasylumsgreatagain864 Others hav 50 year old nuclear-plants on other border like France and beligum. Now they want to prolong even the oldest power plants for decades.....when one blows up....you can also say "told you so"
Yep it’s German
All in all, however, it looks as if Nato will have to catch up on "tactical nuclear" rounds in huge quantity now, so as to counter the Russian threat on that level. Also, since the neo-fascist parasitic Putin regime now gave precedence, overall military and specifically strategic nuclear capability is once again going to suck up effort and money in Cold War II, but this time, Nato must unite in absolute readiness to use nuclear weapons in small scale as well as MAD scale. Welcome to the MADness that is humanity.
No they really shouldn't.
Russia would've lost the war, Ukraine and its own foreseeable future if the decide to use their arsenal in any extend.
They have virtually non existent legitimization for invading a neighbouring country by annihilating anything that is visible.
Just throwing a nuclear bomb because your cannon fudder turned suicidal, is not an option.
The ramifications will eliminate Russia from a viable future.
It's one thing to have them, it's a great deterrent, using them is not an option.
There is no need for tactical nukes. It's better to not even have them and just maintain strategic MAD nukes. If the Russians want to use tactical nukes, they should know the only response will be strategic MAD nukes. Maintaining tactical nukes will give the Russians the idea that they can use nukes and get away with it.
Democracies: Send brave Ukrainians everything they need pronto; let them put an end to Putin's folly. Slava Ukraine 🇺🇦🇨🇦!!
THERE CANT BE WARS ... WITHOUT...WAR DOGS ...WOOF WOOF
Germany army is still scary
world's most powerful ? why and how?
I dont think that it will cause the russians much of a problem, they did not have one in 1945( know big game changer)
If it was that way they would be steamrolling Ukraine and not being forced into a standstill
Russia has NO CHANCE against NATO KEEP IT up boys and girls
What is wrong with her hat?
Why is he twerking on the thumbnail?
German vassality.
Poutine ne réalise pas le bourbier dans lequel la Russie a mis les pieds. Il peine en Ukraine. Alors imaginez un peu la suite.
Wish they could use these weapons on the russians!
they would get destroyed like all the other junk the west has sent
the Ukrainians are doing exactly that
The most powerful is archer
Archer is different than pzh
Actually the Swedish Archer Howitzer and this German Howitzer are about the same in most respects. Nothing if anything to choose between them. One things for sure, you wouldn't want to be the receiving end of either one!
Pzh 2000 is more powerful than archer....but archer is pretty good anyway!
Они розвалились, месяц не прошел, французкий Цезарь намного лучше.
That's not the most powerful howitzer