You'll probably never see this comment, but your channel helped me keep my head level when I was going through a hardship in life. My mind was all over the place that a flat earth seemed logical then. Found you and a few other channels and my mind got right. Thank you for being out there to be discovered.
Appreciate your honesty here, it must've been quite hard! The world is more beautiful this way, glad you're able to enjoy its full magnificence and splendor.
@@Misteribel Hello, yes, it is. I remember watching Dan and being like no you're wrong...kept watching and was like wow dude, thanks! It's good that he is out there amongst the others too like Catz, Stick and many more.
They remove the wires using a computer. And yet, "they" forgot to use the computer to remove the "air" bubbles? How is that for conspiracy consistency?
Just another example of Schrodinger's conspiracy. "They" are both so brilliant that "they" can organise a super-complicated conspiracy involving hundreds of thousands or even millions of people whilst at the same time being so incompetent as to leave bits of evidence that can be noticed by your average basement-dwelling halfwit.
@@moosh1648 - how so? Is it possible that you hadn't thought of this and are now beginning to think for yourself for once? Instead of getting angry try thinking - Dubay's nonsense is a perfect example of the old saying "A little knowledge is a dangerous thing", otherwise known as the Dunning Kruger effect. He has a very limited understanding of everything - and yet it sounds so plausible to the scientifically illiterate - right?
I'm not a flat earther, but the idea that we landed people on the moon with 1960s technology is so dumb it's laughable. They claim they lost or taped over both the original film and all the telemetry for 'Man's greatest technological achievement' 🙄 I mean look how many failures they've had landing probes on Mars, and also how complicated it is to Dock ships with the spacestation. What's the chances that 50 years ago they got to the moon, detached the lunar module, landed successfully, walked about, then took off again and successfully managed to Dock the lunar lander back to the main craft, and then return home? 😂 😂 It's so crazy I don't get why people even humour it. If it was really possible to go there in 1969, do you not think Russia or China would have also been there at least once by now?
You would think the same idiots who say our atmosphere is just based on density would also think density would affect which direction bubbles would go but nope xD
Didn't take then long to abandon the serious, calm tone of an actual documentary for the same angry, childish squawking we've come to expect from flat planet conspiracy theorists
Absolutely overgrown children. They literally don't have the I/EQ to surpass their convictions & frustrations. Easier for them to complain & manufacture self-serving media.
I've learned so much about physics thanks in part to flerfers. They make a claim. I wonder how it really works. I listen to smart people that know how it works. I learn how it really works.
I got into flat earth a few years ago because I wondered how people could believe something that ridiculous, and I've learned a lot about how fake news works. you can take the lessons you learn about FE and apply them to other areas. for instance how people can believe Trump is an actual white supremacist or how people can believe the earth was completely covered in water within 40 days. it really is interesting.
@@cornpop1363 Interesting point. Do you think "white" is far too broad a term for herr drumpf's idea of who has or should have supremacy? Maybe "narcissist" is the more accurate term.
"Why don't they turn Hubble towards Earth?" Yeah, having a 4.7 billion dollar instrument that also costs a fortune to operate, and then using it to look at yourself like a halfwit would sounds pretty reasonable. While at it, how about cashing out for a Boeing 747 and using it as leafblower?
@@Alexagrigorieff Purpose means a lot in this context. Also the KH-11 is said to resemble Hubble, yet it is a different piece of equipment, designed to be a spy satellite.
@@bencesarosi7718 It's got pretty much the same optical capabilities as Hubble. There's no point of having Hubble take a picture of Earth, when there's a similar instrument doing that. Also, Hubble doesn't have a field of view to take a picture of the whole Earth, anyway. Other satellites are doing that, instead.
I don't know exactly what its capabilities are, but I suspect a photo of Earth from Hubble would just be a white smear. It's built to photograph deep space objects over very long periods of time, it's just not within its design to look at something so bright or close.
@dave bcf - I agree - it makes me fucking angry when they speak so disrespectfully to people who have trained so hard and sacrificed so much for science (not that I wouldn't do it if I had the chance). The other thing that grinds my gears is when they harass people who have lost family members in shootings - saying it is fake - I would love to punch those twats.
Flat Earther: "Our intelligent ancestors" Also Our intelligent ancestors: Dog poop can cure aging, mercury is answer for immortality, human and animal sacrifices to control weather and appease god, sickness cause by bad smell, and other crackpot. News flash, our understanding of world around us improve overtime. Well generally, looking at you TikTok.
Also Flat Earther: "Our intelligent ancestors" Intelligent Ancestor Aristotle in his book "On The Heavens": "Again, our observations of the stars make it evident, not only that the Earth is circular, but also that it is a circle of no great size. For quite a small change of position to south or north causes a manifest alteration of the horizon." Intelligent Ancestor Eratosthenes: "Hey bro, I noticed that the sun was in different positions during midday in two different Egyptian cities. Managed to calculate the Earth's circumference."
well, unlike today's flattards, those ancestors were smart enough to work out that the earth is a sphere. but then their IQs must have dropped with every generation until they got to the single-digit IQs we see in today's flattards.
I love how they always claim "if you don't see thats it's CGI, you're mentally deranged" like they would have spent a single minute on how CGI is created, wich programs are used and how to spot animated images.
I offered a bunch ten thousand dollars if they could get in a rocket and show the firmament and a clear flat picture. And the video and pictures would be analyzed. They then said no…..I told them yeah because you know you can’t prove it
That is all priceless and all, but let's never forget the very important fact that Matt Powell has a giant inflatable banana in his backyard which he calls Dr. Peel
I love that guy already (The astronaut that Dubay talked to at the photo booth). He didn't show any offense at the BS that Dubay said, and he simply responded cooly with that bit about public domain. Legendary.
This is not surprising. The space environment is so dangerous, only people cool and collected under attack would be chosen for an astronaut program. Go Mark!
“It’s not sucked out by the vacuum, wake up to yourselves, it’s pushed out by the pressure.” Thank you so much my fellow Australian friend, for being so intelligent and eloquent! Thank you so much! I really love what you just said. Honestly. Spot on. Thanks for the content SciManDan keep it up pal, we love you. Also, Thank you for calling out northern hemisphere chauvinism!
Yep, also weather systems are the result of high pressure moving towards low pressure and the fact that rotation takes place at all, during this process, is enough to render a stationary pancake as utterly impossible.
to be fair, most people, not just flat earthers, believe that vacuums suck. flerfers just refuse to listen to any attempts to correct their misconceptions about gas pressure.
I love how, in order to use the clips of Eddie from the JRE, they have to cut out the parts where Alex Jones, the godfather of conspiracies himself, starts yelling at Eddie that flat earth is the dumbest thing ever.
Eric Dumbay releases a video. Scimandan: "Whoops" Me: "Whoopsie" Scimandan: "Debunking this will be super easy, barely an inconvenience." Eric: "Why don't you just get right of my back."
@@HughJarsz you're alright by me mate it's this level lot I'm worried about. The hostility in that documentary, the fear mongering, it worries me. Their anger worries me. It's the kind of thing that escalates and it will end up hurting people 😔
"Objects fall or rise based on their relative density to the medium surrounding them". This one argument... is the perfect example of how flat heads don't have a fraction of a clue how things work in the real world. Buoyancy and density are utterly meaningless without gravity.
@@logicalobservations2867 Wrong, flat head. Wrong! The density of an object determines how much mass it has and therefore how much it will be affected by gravity. Buoyancy determines how much an object will be affected by gravity when it is in a liquid. If I drop an object, it falls down and only down. There has to some kind of a force to cause that object to start moving down. Newtons first law of motion demands this. Density is in no way, shape or form a force of any kind. Neither is buoyancy. Density is just that... how dense an object is. If one object is more dense than another one, gravity will have a greater affect on it, i.e. it will be heavier. Buoyancy is only a thing in liquid. The buoyancy of an object simply determines how much lighter or heavier than the liquid an object is and how it will be affected by gravity in that liquid. Gravity may or may not be a force depending on who you talk to. But it most certainly behaves like a force in that it can cause an object to move. While the actual why and how gravity works might be a theory, the existence of gravity is not. It has been proven many times. Not my fault you can't get your flat brain around that.
oh, i heard that he's intentionally trying to mimic Stephen Hawking's voice, and doesn't even KNOW Hawking used a speech synthesizer! and he thinks that makes him sound SMARTER! and i also heard a different theory: he's trying to HYPNOTIZE the audience.
@@dragonhealer7588 oh, that's easy, see I'm an molecular biologist and some of my friends are physicists, so I used advanced molecular genetics to create red-skinned, horned humanoids with hooves and huge d*cks and one of my friends used his NASA-derived quantum supercomputer to create a pocket dimension of hellish proportions, where they can survive and thrive. And now my Wicca friend is currently trying to figure out how to get them back with a chalk circle on the floor. This far, all he managed to get out of it was a banana, though...
It’s just a video of their opinions Wonder how many hours of research went into this ;) David Attenborough would bitch slap them for their shoddiness It’s like an investigative journalist writing a piece without investigating it haha
My absolute favorit flerf move is when they're filming some star or planet in the nightsky, zoom in with their crappy camera, and interpret the totally out of focus blurryness as "whats really up there!". Hilarious 😂.
@@Sherwoody they might be, if they'd learn and know about it. But this breed of flerfs just "belives their own eyes". Meaning: zooming in on Venus with a camera like a P900, that is absolutely not capable of capturing anything else than a flickering and out of focus smudge of Venus. And they actually belive (ignoring their incompetence in camera work / optics), that what they see, is what "really is up there". Im always baffled by the level of confidence they're presenting their personal incredulity.
@@SvenGold Actually it is, there's plenty of footage of people zooming in on Venus and other planets with a P900 and P1000 and you can clearly distinct phases and some surface features. They just do this crap on purpose
I watched “beyond the curve” the other day. What a sad film.. the utter failings of the flat Earth movement. Failing everything from family, relationships to evidence of their cause.
Ah yes, but it's all about the quality of failure. It is about the gradual strangulation of any meaningful thought process. The dedication, self sacrifice and pursuit of the ultimate Mong.
I used to hate flat earth people before I saw that film. Now I pity them. All the wasted energy and effort that could be used to expose actual nefarious conspiracies.
I feel sick listening to the obvious lies from Dubai and his followers. If still his flocumentary was funny but using the worst logic fallacies makes me cringe. Well done Dan & Co.👍
The “documentary” is just the 10 Things All Flerfs Say in a two hour format. Makes me want to kick Eric Dubay down a flight of stairs, since he is magnitudes denser than everything.
It's so funny when flerfers show clips of astronauts in space and then in water tanks, because the difference between how water tank shots look from actual EVA in space just slaps you so hard in the face.
The people in water have massive streams of bubbles all over the place. The image is blue and kind of... wavy. It looks completely different to the space footage.
@@mattburgess5697 Their movement is different too. For instance, if they move a hand in water, the resistance causes them to move by "paddle" in the opposite direction. In space no such thing happens.
@@mattburgess5697 the waviness (ripples) is primarily from the surface of the water. I’ve seen them over 30 metres down and the only time they are not visible is at night or in murky water. Lighting underwater is also difficult. Backlighting creates backscatter, and using any kind of light causes a spotlight effect. Hollywood doesn’t shoot weightless scenes underwater because it doesn’t work.
In space the heads of the astronauts look absolutely normal and how they should. In water the astronauts head shrinks and destorts due to the water effect. Lol!
but then, if Flerfs could observe clearly what they look at, they would not still claim "the horizon always rises to eye level", would not overlook that the "Black Swann" was a one day affair with all other recordings showing an expected view of the platforms BEHIND the horizon and so on... at BEST they are very shoddy observers that jump to conclusions long before they would dhave had time to analyze what they see.. at worst they're not just stupid but also dishonest about it.
Imagine having that interaction at the book signing table and actually thinking sharing it with the world is a good idea. "Watch me get removed by security for bothering a room of sane people."
I once did the "zoom into a ship on the horizon" video showing a boat over the curve. When I put it on a flat earth forum, I was asked what camera I'd used, I replied that it was a Canon. The flat-earthers response was that I should only use a Nikon (specifically the P900) as that is the only one to show it properly. Apparently, Canon is part of the conspiracy but Nikon isn't.
Your channel really needs more attention! Not only might your content snap some people out of whatever they’re going through that causes them to buy into conspiracies, but I just genuinely find your content really entertaining and educational!
The absolute craziest part, there's a vid Dan did debunking one of those flerfers, and in the flerer's OWN video they took of the moon you can see ISS pass in front of the full moon, right on time, which was why the flerfer was filming the moon to begin with. How can you friggin film it yourself, then post the video online denying it exists? That is beyond insane level of denial.
9:40 Zero G plane. Are these the same people that believe gravity doesn't exist and it's all down to buoyancy? How does the buoyancy model work in the "vomit comet", or more specifically, how does the plane's motion overcome 'density' to allow people to float around? If you believe in JUST density to make things sink to the ground, then shouldn't they sink to the floor of the plane regardless of what it's doing?
Inertia would be the first answer. But then again the question arises - how does the body now where to float in the medium around it, when there's only inertia? This whole buoyancy idea of why things fall or rise has a lot of holes in it. And in the end, they just have absolutely no clue and talk only to people without even basic knowledge of physics.
Good point. As a skydiver, I had first hand experience of zero gravity when the plane stalled and we were all left floating around in the cabin. Also, there have been videos of a density tower taken in a "vomit comet", which totally mixes as soon and zero b kicks in and recovers itself when the plane resumes normal flight, proving the buoyancy model does not work with gravity.
Also, it is not possible to have (or calculate the magnitude of) buoyancy without the existence of the gravitational force. This, however, never seems to cause any issues for reality deniers.
When I noticed this vid was 45 minutes long I thought "yeah this will have loads of fails hehe" and I knew I would start my Friday with a smile. Cheers Dan. Also good luck with the running pal. That guy chasing the astronauts around was so cringe. Needs a boot in the youknowwhats if you ask me.
And to think, all of this started because Eric's uncle "got his nose." But when Eric found out it was just a thumb, and not his actual nose, the world came crashing down.
That's funny, I had a discussion with two psychologists two weeks ago about the reasons behind flerfery. I then made the exact same joke as you to explain the origins of complete paranoia: "Everything I know is a lie."
Anyone notice how almost all of the 10/10 reviews for this documentary on IMDB are from user accounts that are just a few weeks old? The reviews with a lower score don’t follow that same trend. I can’t think of a reason why this would happen.
I hate when NASA reps say "We don't have the technology" to go further than low earth orbit. The correct word is not technology... the correct word is HARDWARE. /smh
n. The application of science, especially to industrial or commercial objectives. n. The scientific method and material used to achieve a commercial or industrial objective. Both definitions fit perfectly
@@tiaxanderson9725 a rectangle will fit in a square hole, but a square will fit better. While”technology” in context will work, “hardware” is more specific and limits the potential misrepresentation. We DO have the technology if you’re talking computer power, but we don’t have a rocket large enough at the moment. We lack the hardware.
@@tiaxanderson9725 They do, but the implication that is often drawn from the statement; "We don't have the technology..." is that we don't know how to, which is completely wrong. That's what the OP is referencing, I think.
actually, they say "we can't send manned missions higher than LEO SAFELY". SAFELY. and the Apollo missions were unsafe, at least by their CURRENT standards.
"Every image of space that you see on Google is computer generated." Absolutely true. Every image of ANYTHING on Google is computer generated. Every image anywhere online is computer generated. Any image on your hard drive is computer generated. Any image taken with a digital camera is computer generated. Any image scanned from hard copy and stored digitally is computer generated. That's what a digital image literally is. Doesn't mean the images are fake.
@@flatearthanswers well, it's a rotating oblate spheroid that's in space and not that funny, but sure. It's demonstrable and proven but you keep believing nonsense from thousands of years ago. Also, stop using your cell phone, tv, streaming services, the internet (including RUclips), GPS, and everything else that uses satellites in outer space, put there by space missions, that are in orbit around the globe. Put your money where your mouth is. Now that would be funny!
The old pictures were either matte paintings or similar trickery. The "it's CGI"-thing is simply a stubborn dismissal and no evidence will ever be enough. Some flerfers want a camera on a rocket going into space. After they saw that they now want it rotating and panning around. After they will see that it will still just be "CGI". The key issue is the utter and total disbelief of everything.
@@DARTHMOBIUS That would end in one of two ways: 1. The flerf denies everything he experiences. 2. The flerf is convinced, but the other flerfs deny the flerf was ever really a flerf.
Yeah, like their other favorite, "Why can't we see stars in the same picture as the Apollo astronauts on the moon?" Because they're much better photographers than that!! They know how to adjust lens aperture and shutter speed to get a decent exposure. Unlike a flerfer that goes out and spends money on a p9000 and doesn't bother learning how to use it.
If any of these guys ever figured out what a Users Manual was for, then someone like Bob Noodle & Co. wouldn't have "discovered" multiple suns when not knowing how to use a telescope.
That bit when the guy starts badgering that other guy for selling pictures that are available for free is really irksome. I wish somebody in that line woulda spoke up, "yo brother! We're not being duped into buying a free picture. We're getting the memory of meeting a person that did some cool sh*t, and getting a momento to remind us of the good things humanity is capable of. Not only did you just insult all the work that man put into his life, when there were so many other roads to go down, but you just called me an idiot too."
The pictures of planets out of focus is funny. A couple years back, one of our cameramen at a NASCAR race turned the camera to the sky and was able to zoom in and focus on Jupiter, there are even a couple of it's moons in the image. I had to grab a screenshot because it was so cool. These people really need to use the right equipment for the task they are attempting.
"oh you're that guy" that dude is doing exactly what should be done with flat earthers confronting you. Just ignore them, and don't even bothering giving them enough respect to remember them clearly.
“So look at the difference in the apparent sizes of the faces inside the exact same helmet. Any idea why Eric? Sit cross legged and think about it for a second. Of course it’s refraction. Super easy, barely an inconvenience” Using other youtubers catchphrases is TIGHT!
@@SpaceManWyo so the earth is flat you say the earth is flat i decided what evidence do you have about that oh i'll need you to get off my back about that thing ok i'll get off of that thing
The "hanging from harnesses" talking point always baffles me; I would well imagine people might tie themselves to something when they're FLOATING IN ZERO GRAVITY. Whereas if nobody ever did, that would be comparably unusual.
Also one of the things these flerfs can't explain with their so called "Density and Buoyancy" is how do objects weigh more at the poles than they do at the equator? This can easily be explained by a Centrifugal force due to the Earth's rotation, but not on a stationary plane and their so called "Density and Buoyancy"
@QED And so is THIS -- FE is too obnoxiously unwilling to be reasoned with (Ranty notwithstanding) so we add comments and click thumbs and fade them into the 'level backwater' of the web from whence they come
"the Ocean, as far as I know, doesn't have wings" - this sentence killed me :D flerfl: But how do you know?! HaVe yOu TesTeD aLL oCEan DrOpS?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
The really frightening part of Eric's narrative is the possibility of it becoming part of the world's view. Consider the classic Sci-Fi novel 'the Chrysalids' and if you read the backstory, you discover that the whole premise of their way of life, wasn't based on logic or reasoning. It was based on one person's opinion, (which turned out to be flawed), written down and discovered years after his death. His wasn't the smartest or the most intuitive or even the most honest view. It turned out his was the loudest voice or the only surviving voice after the apocalypse and since it was discovered by uneducated, fanatical, easily swayed sheep; it became the ACCEPTED view. It became enmeshed in the dominant religion and each caused the other to thrive. Where have we seen this before.....? Oh that's right.....Baghdad, 800-1100 A.D. the greatest seat of scientific advancement the world has ever known until the fall of Baghdad to the barbarian hordes. And whose voice was loudest and tied to the religion at the time? Al-Ghazali, a great cleric and teacher who unfortunately believed that "the manipulation of numbers is the tool of the devil' 800 years later....where does Baghdad fall in the scale of scientific advancement today?
That's also ignoring that if NASA were faking it they could just not provide a video at all. Not that many people watch the livestreams of the spacewalks. The flerfs think NASA pays a ton of money to make these "fake" videos not many people watch in order to fool "everyone" when NASA could simply not do a livestream and barely anyone would notice.
@@davebcf1231 That is the the thing that I don't get. Nobody is witnessing or meeting people who talk about space exploration in their everyday life. Same thing goes for TV and schools. Most of my knowledge about space that I have learned is from reading science books, astronomers, physicist or the internet.
@@davebcf1231 The same argument could be applied to space exploration itself. If "they" were trying to fool us into thinking we lived on a globe to "hide God" why would "they" have bothered "faking space" at all? They apparently managed with this deception perfectly well right up to WW2 without faking a fraudulent space programme.
@@davidfaraday7963 The flerf answer to that is that they think it's a scam for money. They don't understand economics any better than they understand science, so the idea that we see a huge return on that investment is something they can't even begin to grasp.
@@davebcf1231 Yup, like Daniel Pratt saying that they should give HIM (LOLOLOLOL) the money and that he will "teach" people how to live of the land WITHOUT WORKING XD
I love the people they feature as though they're some kind of experts when they're not even close. A tattoo artist, some dude that drinks piss, and Eddie Bravo, a martial artist. Is this supposed to be convincing?
eric must have gotten absolutely humiliated one day by a teacher or someone in school, and from that day on, he vowed to teach himself and just quit the third grade.
Paraphrased: “Gravity is strong enough to hold oceans to the Earth’s surface, but it can’t hold a helium balloon?” Is this person seriously suggesting that the buoyancy of a helium balloon will propel it to escape velocity? Of course, he asks this immediately after suggesting that the Earth’s rotational rate of .0007 RPM should provide sufficient centrifugal force at the equator to fling skyscrapers out into space. So, not the sharpest bulb in the cake. “99.9% of the religious people on Earth appeal to the scientific consensus regarding the beginning of the universe and the beginning of life...” I would be _really_ interested in seeing the details of the poll that yielded that statistic. If the figure stated were 50%, I _might_ buy that. “None of our ancestors had the tools to measure the Earth, and the leisure or privilege to actually think about it.” Uh… Eratosthenes? And _none_ of our ancestors had “the leisure or privilege to actually think about it”? Does this guy have brain damage or something? “But there is not even one Bible verse that has flat Earth in it.” Unless he is stating that the words “flat Earth” do not literally appear in the text of the Bible, this claim is just patently false. There is more than one verse that describes the Earth this way. And, more to the point, the Biblical perception absolutely _was_ of a flat Earth. Specifically, they viewed the Earth as an inverse snowglobe: a flat, disc-shaped world, held up on pillars extending down into “The Deep”, and covered by the “firmament”, a crystalline dome containing the Sun, Moon, planets, and stars, which held out the water they thought filled outer space, or atleast their pale conception of it.
30:48 Santos, the nicest and smartest person in the world, who totally didn't threaten to kill anybody, or drop enough C words to make an Aussie Sailor blush.
"Everything since the 60's has been CGI...", _really_ Eric, *the 60's?* Explain 60's monster movies then, or hell, _Star Trek,_ that really look like CGI to you? What, NASA had a bigger budget than Hollywood? Are you _sure_ you don't have a head injury...?
@@NickJaime I didn't say Star *Wars,* I said Star _Trek,_ the television series from the 60's. Yes, technically the first "CGI" appeared in Hitchcock's "Vertigo" in 1958, but what that _was,_ and what Eric _means_ when he says CGI, are two completely different things. Perhaps I should have been more clear, the CGI that existed in the 60's was too crude to accomplish what he seems to think it could. He's applying today's technological _capabilities_ to the _technology_ of 50 years ago.
This is priceless.....classic comedy at its best....thank you Dan for the entertainment.....the best video is when his wife tells him to shut up and get in the car.....he doesnt argue....hmmm
The first ten space tourist flights should be reserved for flerfs--including Dr. Peel. There is literally so much debris circling the globe that if we don't do something to clean it up it may one day become impossible to launch vehicles into space.
“I need pictures and evidence then I’ll believe you” is presented with pictures and evidence. “ITS FAKE”
All of this without a single piece of actual evidence on their side
Me: You dont deserve evidence
@@Chase_baker_1996 TRUE!
Oh no, it's UNO reverse card.
Where is the hundreds of photos of flat Earth?
@@Nerazmus They're all CG thus the Earth isn't flat ;)
checkmate
You'll probably never see this comment, but your channel helped me keep my head level when I was going through a hardship in life. My mind was all over the place that a flat earth seemed logical then. Found you and a few other channels and my mind got right. Thank you for being out there to be discovered.
Glad you kept your head up and didn't fall down that rabbit hole.
@@henkpotvis8772 Thanks my friend! Appreciate the kind words.
Appreciate your honesty here, it must've been quite hard! The world is more beautiful this way, glad you're able to enjoy its full magnificence and splendor.
@@Misteribel Hello, yes, it is. I remember watching Dan and being like no you're wrong...kept watching and was like wow dude, thanks! It's good that he is out there amongst the others too like Catz, Stick and many more.
good for you. its hard sometimes. but trust the professional consensus 99.9% of the time... your amazing for hanging in there and doing more research.
They remove the wires using a computer.
And yet, "they" forgot to use the computer to remove the "air" bubbles?
How is that for conspiracy consistency?
@@moosh1648 What's your problem?
Just another example of Schrodinger's conspiracy. "They" are both so brilliant that "they" can organise a super-complicated conspiracy involving hundreds of thousands or even millions of people whilst at the same time being so incompetent as to leave bits of evidence that can be noticed by your average basement-dwelling halfwit.
@@moosh1648 - how so? Is it possible that you hadn't thought of this and are now beginning to think for yourself for once?
Instead of getting angry try thinking - Dubay's nonsense is a perfect example of the old saying "A little knowledge is a dangerous thing", otherwise known as the Dunning Kruger effect.
He has a very limited understanding of everything - and yet it sounds so plausible to the scientifically illiterate - right?
@@moosh1648 Why is he a straight idiot? Or are you just bent in the head?
I'm not a flat earther, but the idea that we landed people on the moon with 1960s technology is so dumb it's laughable.
They claim they lost or taped over both the original film and all the telemetry for 'Man's greatest technological achievement' 🙄
I mean look how many failures they've had landing probes on Mars, and also how complicated it is to Dock ships with the spacestation.
What's the chances that 50 years ago they got to the moon, detached the lunar module, landed successfully, walked about, then took off again and successfully managed to Dock the lunar lander back to the main craft, and then return home? 😂 😂 It's so crazy I don't get why people even humour it.
If it was really possible to go there in 1969, do you not think Russia or China would have also been there at least once by now?
Space: a place where "bubbles" go sideways, and diagonally up and down, instead of vertically straight up.
Some pool!
Its because of density and buyoancy, see
You would think the same idiots who say our atmosphere is just based on density would also think density would affect which direction bubbles would go but nope xD
@@masterludovicus802
They can *think* ?
I’ve only ever seen them rise upwards in “space”
@@richardcarre75
Then go look for other videos that aren‘t cherry picked by flatearthers.
Didn't take then long to abandon the serious, calm tone of an actual documentary for the same angry, childish squawking we've come to expect from flat planet conspiracy theorists
Absolutely overgrown children. They literally don't have the I/EQ to surpass their convictions & frustrations. Easier for them to complain & manufacture self-serving media.
@ScryLite S what the f🎉k did that mess even mean?
laughed when they were talking about mass while denying gravity
@ScryLite S it's _YOU'RE_
A dumb comment by an obviously thirsty low life. I'll ignore you after this comment.
@@pureflix8086 what did they say? Looks like they deleted the comment.
I've learned so much about physics thanks in part to flerfers. They make a claim. I wonder how it really works. I listen to smart people that know how it works. I learn how it really works.
Same here. When the flat Earth phenomenon began 6 years ago, someone asked, "how do you know the Earth is a globe?"
So I found out.
I got into flat earth a few years ago because I wondered how people could believe something that ridiculous, and I've learned a lot about how fake news works. you can take the lessons you learn about FE and apply them to other areas. for instance how people can believe Trump is an actual white supremacist or how people can believe the earth was completely covered in water within 40 days. it really is interesting.
Snap. To be honest, if not for Flat Earth I wouldn't even know our model is called Heliocentric.
@@cornpop1363 Interesting point. Do you think "white" is far too broad a term for herr drumpf's idea of who has or should have supremacy? Maybe "narcissist" is the more accurate term.
@@cornpop1363 agree
"Why don't they turn Hubble towards Earth?"
Yeah, having a 4.7 billion dollar instrument that also costs a fortune to operate, and then using it to look at yourself like a halfwit would sounds pretty reasonable.
While at it, how about cashing out for a Boeing 747 and using it as leafblower?
They have Hubbles looking toward Earth. But those are called KH-11 Kennen.
@@Alexagrigorieff Purpose means a lot in this context. Also the KH-11 is said to resemble Hubble, yet it is a different piece of equipment, designed to be a spy satellite.
@@bencesarosi7718 It's got pretty much the same optical capabilities as Hubble. There's no point of having Hubble take a picture of Earth, when there's a similar instrument doing that. Also, Hubble doesn't have a field of view to take a picture of the whole Earth, anyway. Other satellites are doing that, instead.
I don't know exactly what its capabilities are, but I suspect a photo of Earth from Hubble would just be a white smear. It's built to photograph deep space objects over very long periods of time, it's just not within its design to look at something so bright or close.
a jet engine remounted and repurposed to put out fires... does that count?
ruclips.net/video/j7Ss3BMrscE/видео.html
Einstein once said: "There are 2 things that are endless, the universe and human stupidity, and i am not sure about the universe..."
My favorite quote ever
Usually the flerf stupidity is pretty funny, but it pisses me off when they harass astronauts. Shame Mark Kelly didn't pull a Buzz Aldrin on the guy
I was SO hoping he would!! lol
Buzz is my hero for that punch lol.
@dave bcf - I agree - it makes me fucking angry when they speak so disrespectfully to people who have trained so hard and sacrificed so much for science (not that I wouldn't do it if I had the chance).
The other thing that grinds my gears is when they harass people who have lost family members in shootings - saying it is fake - I would love to punch those twats.
@@honeychurchgipsy6 Agreed, the Sandy Hook deniers and their ilk are the scum of the earth.
I think he handled it pretty well tbh
Flat Earther: "Our intelligent ancestors"
Also Our intelligent ancestors: Dog poop can cure aging, mercury is answer for immortality, human and animal sacrifices to control weather and appease god, sickness cause by bad smell, and other crackpot.
News flash, our understanding of world around us improve overtime. Well generally, looking at you TikTok.
Also
Flat Earther: "Our intelligent ancestors"
Intelligent Ancestor Aristotle in his book "On The Heavens": "Again, our observations of the stars make it evident, not only that the Earth is circular, but also that it is a circle of no great size. For quite a small change of position to south or north causes a manifest alteration of the horizon."
Intelligent Ancestor Eratosthenes: "Hey bro, I noticed that the sun was in different positions during midday in two different Egyptian cities. Managed to calculate the Earth's circumference."
well, unlike today's flattards, those ancestors were smart enough to work out that the earth is a sphere. but then their IQs must have dropped with every generation until they got to the single-digit IQs we see in today's flattards.
Didn't putting a chicken on your head cure something at one point too?
@@johnlarkin3166 what kind of chicken? alive? dead? with feathers? plucked? raw? cooked? boiled? fried? grilled?
people believe all kinds of nonsense.
@@mrxmry3264 I believe plucked
"SUPER EASY! BARELY AN INCONVENIENCE!"
That's my kind of easter egg
I noticed that too and I loved it
Timestamp?
Easter eggs are tight
Wow, wow, wow, wow...wow
@@porkeyminch8044 6:01
I love how they always claim "if you don't see thats it's CGI, you're mentally deranged" like they would have spent a single minute on how CGI is created, wich programs are used and how to spot animated images.
I offered a bunch ten thousand dollars if they could get in a rocket and show the firmament and a clear flat picture. And the video and pictures would be analyzed. They then said no…..I told them yeah because you know you can’t prove it
Yeah the CGI is definitely something they obviously have little to no experience with.
Same goes for technology in general.
That is all priceless and all, but let's never forget the very important fact that Matt Powell has a giant inflatable banana in his backyard which he calls Dr. Peel
And is a vile POS.
"Backyard" is a euphemism... lol.
This is the result of trying to force a meme. It's awful
@@jakecooper5855 why? You do realise the reason dont you, and as Matt Powell is a vile racist, homophobic liar he deserves no sympathy.
@@pureflix8086 ahh, i see what you did there gg wp
I love that guy already (The astronaut that Dubay talked to at the photo booth). He didn't show any offense at the BS that Dubay said, and he simply responded cooly with that bit about public domain. Legendary.
This is not surprising. The space environment is so dangerous, only people cool and collected under attack would be chosen for an astronaut program.
Go Mark!
That was not Eric asking the question. He is the main narrator
“It’s not sucked out by the vacuum, wake up to yourselves, it’s pushed out by the pressure.”
Thank you so much my fellow Australian friend, for being so intelligent and eloquent!
Thank you so much!
I really love what you just said.
Honestly. Spot on.
Thanks for the content SciManDan keep it up pal, we love you.
Also, Thank you for calling out northern hemisphere chauvinism!
Its like these people get their idea of space from movie
Yep, also weather systems are the result of high pressure moving towards low pressure and the fact that rotation takes place at all, during this process, is enough to render a stationary pancake as utterly impossible.
Lol
As my highschool physics teacher kept saying, nothing sucks, everything blows
to be fair, most people, not just flat earthers, believe that vacuums suck. flerfers just refuse to listen to any attempts to correct their misconceptions about gas pressure.
I love how, in order to use the clips of Eddie from the JRE, they have to cut out the parts where Alex Jones, the godfather of conspiracies himself, starts yelling at Eddie that flat earth is the dumbest thing ever.
You know your ideas are stupid if Alex Jones calls them dumb.
That makes me laugh so hard
This conspiracy is neither backed by Jones nor Trump? Get outta here!!!!!!!
That's pretty spot on lol
If Alex jones makes you look like the bigger idiot something is seriously wrong
Eric Dumbay releases a video.
Scimandan: "Whoops"
Me: "Whoopsie"
Scimandan: "Debunking this will be super easy, barely an inconvenience."
Eric: "Why don't you just get right of my back."
"Ok, I'll get off that thing."
Wow wow wow, wow wow.
So, you have a Flat Earth Documentary for me?
Yes Sir, I do!
Stuff that debunks flat earthers is tight.
Why do you say the earth is flat?
Because.
That works for me.
The real conspiracy here is that Dan has tricked me into watching those loonies and their ranting yet again! 🤦🏼♀️😁👍
U love it though
@@skimpyjim I do! 😭👍
Which loonies? Dubay and co, or people like that fat bloke?
@@HughJarsz Now that's funny, I don't care who you are lol.
@@HughJarsz you're alright by me mate it's this level lot I'm worried about. The hostility in that documentary, the fear mongering, it worries me. Their anger worries me. It's the kind of thing that escalates and it will end up hurting people 😔
"Super Easy. Barely an inconvenience."
Love the nod to Ryan George.
Why did he do it? Because. (Fair enough)
"Objects fall or rise based on their relative density to the medium surrounding them". This one argument... is the perfect example of how flat heads don't have a fraction of a clue how things work in the real world. Buoyancy and density are utterly meaningless without gravity.
Density would still be meaningful, but it wouldn't cause objects to move.
Gravity is NOTHING more than
Density & Buoyancy rebranded.
WITHOUT "Grabbity" the spinning pear globe CONspiracy is impossiBALL!!!
@@logicalobservations2867
Your username is extremely ironic.
@@Acheron666 keep hurtling through "Infinite Space" on a spinning ball 🌏🤡's
@@logicalobservations2867 Wrong, flat head. Wrong! The density of an object determines how much mass it has and therefore how much it will be affected by gravity. Buoyancy determines how much an object will be affected by gravity when it is in a liquid.
If I drop an object, it falls down and only down. There has to some kind of a force to cause that object to start moving down. Newtons first law of motion demands this. Density is in no way, shape or form a force of any kind. Neither is buoyancy. Density is just that... how dense an object is. If one object is more dense than another one, gravity will have a greater affect on it, i.e. it will be heavier. Buoyancy is only a thing in liquid. The buoyancy of an object simply determines how much lighter or heavier than the liquid an object is and how it will be affected by gravity in that liquid. Gravity may or may not be a force depending on who you talk to. But it most certainly behaves like a force in that it can cause an object to move.
While the actual why and how gravity works might be a theory, the existence of gravity is not. It has been proven many times. Not my fault you can't get your flat brain around that.
I have a new hypothesis- Eric DuBay isn't real, that's why his voice is so monotone and he never debates anyone.
He certainly likes the sound of his own voice though! lol Pity he’s got nothing intelligent to say!
Even Dr Peel doesn’t think that Eric is real.
I need that documentary A.S.A.P.! Dubay is CGI!
#dubayisnotreal
oh, i heard that he's intentionally trying to mimic Stephen Hawking's voice, and doesn't even KNOW Hawking used a speech synthesizer!
and he thinks that makes him sound SMARTER!
and i also heard a different theory: he's trying to HYPNOTIZE the audience.
"godless, atheist and demonic"
How can you be atheist and demonic at the same time?
Well according to them, if you don't believe in Jesus, you're a demon...
@@Slum0vsky demons don't have to believe, they know. But they don't exist either, so...
I don't understand how demons can exist unless God's exist. Just how would an atheist be demonic ????
@@dragonhealer7588 oh, that's easy, see I'm an molecular biologist and some of my friends are physicists, so I used advanced molecular genetics to create red-skinned, horned humanoids with hooves and huge d*cks and one of my friends used his NASA-derived quantum supercomputer to create a pocket dimension of hellish proportions, where they can survive and thrive.
And now my Wicca friend is currently trying to figure out how to get them back with a chalk circle on the floor. This far, all he managed to get out of it was a banana, though...
@@midnight8341
Wait!!!
Then why wasn't I invited to the party????😯
Flerf: "do your own research"
Also flerf: *doesnt do any research*
By research they mean watch flat earth videos on RUclips 🤣🤣🤣. I guess in flat earth research means Google flat earth and watch stupid videos
More like:
Flerf: “do your own research”
Also flerf: *mistakes RUclips videos for research*
Flerf: Research? We don’t need no stinking research.
Also flerf: denies evidence supplied by someone who did their own research.
Flerfs can't even spell research, they think watching more RUclips videos by other flerfs counts as research.
"Bubbles in Space" sounds like a cool name for a band playing '90s disco hits covers with lyrics mocking tinfoilers
I hope I'm not the only one who cracked up upon hearing "astrotheologist".
Naaa me too. It’s was hilarious.
As an avid neologenist myself, I find "astrotheologist" to be a perfectly apt construction, albeit limited in application.
no, but I did crack up at "hyper-bowl" like its a football game
"Thanks Santos"
reminds me of a character in a book who called Astrophysics "a$$hole physics"!
The Ancient Greeks had worked out the world was a globe and had a go at estimating its circumference. This predates NASA and even the Jesuits
Clearly NASA has a time machine and created this deception in 6th century BCE Greece.
@@sourisvoleur4854 I can attest to this and said machine is powered by peperoni.
@@pm1660 - Thus the Jesuit angle.
@@sourisvoleur4854 I thought a Jesuit angle came from a triangle with side lengths of 1,1,1.
@@goldenknight578 heh
I'm sure you said, "Donkeymentary" 🤔
It would certainly make sense what with Dubay making such an Ass of himself. 🤣
He did say Donkeymentary which is a work of total fiction?
Donkeys are precious. They don’t deserve the slander.
Dont insult the donkeys, It's more a Dumbcumentary
Me too
@@robbarton7972
yeah, total fiction is right. no facts at all in eric scumbag's despicable piece of flattard propaganda.
So much of the "documentary" is just childish insults and unsubstantiated claims ontop of unsubstantiated claims.
Dont forget the drugs
And the pee drinking... :(
Dude, Child listen to adult and learn REAL SCIENCE from them, but theses guy DONT even listen to anyone, so they are WORSE than a child.
It is a physical impossibility for a Flerf to make a "documentary" when ever they try they always make a "donkey-mentary"
It's just a long version of his usual RUclips videos and of similar quality.
Bob Knodell and Jeran starred in one.
Ohhhh, I thought they all say “donkey-monkeyery”, my mistake...
It’s just a video of their opinions
Wonder how many hours of research went into this ;)
David Attenborough would bitch slap them for their shoddiness
It’s like an investigative journalist writing a piece without investigating it haha
@@problemchild1976 doesn't david attenborough focus on conservation stuff rather than trying to disprove the flerfers
My absolute favorit flerf move is when they're filming some star or planet in the nightsky, zoom in with their crappy camera, and interpret the totally out of focus blurryness as "whats really up there!". Hilarious 😂.
They are especially afraid of Venus, likely because it displays phases.
@@Sherwoody they might be, if they'd learn and know about it. But this breed of flerfs just "belives their own eyes". Meaning: zooming in on Venus with a camera like a P900, that is absolutely not capable of capturing anything else than a flickering and out of focus smudge of Venus. And they actually belive (ignoring their incompetence in camera work / optics), that what they see, is what "really is up there". Im always baffled by the level of confidence they're presenting their personal incredulity.
@@SvenGold actually for Venus, all you need is a pair of binoculars.
Same with UFO hunters in the nineties and noughties: slow panning, controlled zooming in or out, and using a tripod, always absent.
@@SvenGold Actually it is, there's plenty of footage of people zooming in on Venus and other planets with a P900 and P1000 and you can clearly distinct phases and some surface features. They just do this crap on purpose
I watched “beyond the curve” the other day.
What a sad film.. the utter failings of the flat Earth movement. Failing everything from family, relationships to evidence of their cause.
interesting... and thanks, bob!
Ah yes, but it's all about the quality of failure. It is about the gradual strangulation of any meaningful thought process. The dedication, self sacrifice and pursuit of the ultimate Mong.
@JohnnyRotten You, sir, are a star! I'm watching now and can't believe what I'm seeing XD
@JohnnyRotten So yummy for my tummy
I used to hate flat earth people before I saw that film. Now I pity them. All the wasted energy and effort that could be used to expose actual nefarious conspiracies.
I'm tempted to kick start a ticket for Eddy Bravo to LEO under the condition: if the Earth is round he stays up there.
Hahahahahaha
"And you think we are the moronic ones?"
Well... yes! Of course! Without a doubt!
I'm actually quite impressed by the heat exchange system for the space station. Always wondered how they did that.
..i thought they do the Anakin and the trick is spinning.
I feel sick listening to the obvious lies from Dubai and his followers. If still his flocumentary was funny but using the worst logic fallacies makes me cringe.
Well done Dan & Co.👍
The “documentary” is just the 10 Things All Flerfs Say in a two hour format.
Makes me want to kick Eric Dubay down a flight of stairs, since he is magnitudes denser than everything.
I hope it is a massive flight of stairs, like 50 stories worth in one straight line so he thinks its a flat set of stairs.
It's so funny when flerfers show clips of astronauts in space and then in water tanks, because the difference between how water tank shots look from actual EVA in space just slaps you so hard in the face.
The people in water have massive streams of bubbles all over the place. The image is blue and kind of... wavy. It looks completely different to the space footage.
@@mattburgess5697 Their movement is different too. For instance, if they move a hand in water, the resistance causes them to move by "paddle" in the opposite direction. In space no such thing happens.
@@mattburgess5697 the waviness (ripples) is primarily from the surface of the water. I’ve seen them over 30 metres down and the only time they are not visible is at night or in murky water.
Lighting underwater is also difficult. Backlighting creates backscatter, and using any kind of light causes a spotlight effect. Hollywood doesn’t shoot weightless scenes underwater because it doesn’t work.
In space the heads of the astronauts look absolutely normal and how they should. In water the astronauts head shrinks and destorts due to the water effect. Lol!
but then, if Flerfs could observe clearly what they look at, they would not still claim "the horizon always rises to eye level", would not overlook that the "Black Swann" was a one day affair with all other recordings showing an expected view of the platforms BEHIND the horizon and so on...
at BEST they are very shoddy observers that jump to conclusions long before they would dhave had time to analyze what they see.. at worst they're not just stupid but also dishonest about it.
Imagine having that interaction at the book signing table and actually thinking sharing it with the world is a good idea.
"Watch me get removed by security for bothering a room of sane people."
"The tax payers!"
I loved the astronauts smooth response: "You can use these pictures as well, why not write your own book?"
I once did the "zoom into a ship on the horizon" video showing a boat over the curve.
When I put it on a flat earth forum, I was asked what camera I'd used, I replied that it was a Canon.
The flat-earthers response was that I should only use a Nikon (specifically the P900) as that is the only one to show it properly. Apparently, Canon is part of the conspiracy but Nikon isn't.
reminds me of a video where Red's Rhetoric recorded the ISS passing in front of the moon, WITH a P900!
Those ships I zoomed with a P900 or P1000, so that are flat earth approved.
😂
Your channel really needs more attention! Not only might your content snap some people out of whatever they’re going through that causes them to buy into conspiracies, but I just genuinely find your content really entertaining and educational!
So when I see the ISS through a telescope during an overhead flyby, I am actually looking at the CG-Sky ?
Na fam nasa hacked your telescope they generate the iminge in real time 🤣🤣🤣
@@albedo4008 The SiO2 in my telescope is solely in the glass lenses. No electronics involved, purely analogue. Perhaps it's demons? lol
Everyone knows it's just a balloon which can be precisely controlled to appear at the exact time predicted by several websites all over the world!!
@@jeanwalker5106 i dont now, maybe 🤣
The absolute craziest part, there's a vid Dan did debunking one of those flerfers, and in the flerer's OWN video they took of the moon you can see ISS pass in front of the full moon, right on time, which was why the flerfer was filming the moon to begin with. How can you friggin film it yourself, then post the video online denying it exists? That is beyond insane level of denial.
9:40 Zero G plane. Are these the same people that believe gravity doesn't exist and it's all down to buoyancy?
How does the buoyancy model work in the "vomit comet", or more specifically, how does the plane's motion overcome 'density' to allow people to float around? If you believe in JUST density to make things sink to the ground, then shouldn't they sink to the floor of the plane regardless of what it's doing?
Well done!
Inertia would be the first answer. But then again the question arises - how does the body now where to float in the medium around it, when there's only inertia? This whole buoyancy idea of why things fall or rise has a lot of holes in it. And in the end, they just have absolutely no clue and talk only to people without even basic knowledge of physics.
Good point. As a skydiver, I had first hand experience of zero gravity when the plane stalled and we were all left floating around in the cabin. Also, there have been videos of a density tower taken in a "vomit comet", which totally mixes as soon and zero b kicks in and recovers itself when the plane resumes normal flight, proving the buoyancy model does not work with gravity.
Also, it is not possible to have (or calculate the magnitude of) buoyancy without the existence of the gravitational force. This, however, never seems to cause any issues for reality deniers.
Great point! 👏
When I noticed this vid was 45 minutes long I thought "yeah this will have loads of fails hehe" and I knew I would start my Friday with a smile. Cheers Dan. Also good luck with the running pal.
That guy chasing the astronauts around was so cringe. Needs a boot in the youknowwhats if you ask me.
That's why Buzz Aldrin punched one of 'em. I think the judge said he woulda done it too.
@@revolution3395 It never even went before a judge. The DA dropped the few initial charges, and refused to file any others. :)
A good right hook and it’s bang, zoom, right to the moon.
@@rat3072 - It's been years since I heard the story, don't know the full details but at least Buzz let him know.
And to think, all of this started because Eric's uncle "got his nose." But when Eric found out it was just a thumb, and not his actual nose, the world came crashing down.
That's funny, I had a discussion with two psychologists two weeks ago about the reasons behind flerfery. I then made the exact same joke as you to explain the origins of complete paranoia: "Everything I know is a lie."
Yeah but he was 22 years old at the time
@@gaoxing7699nobody assumed Eric was a child when this incident happened 😂
Anyone notice how almost all of the 10/10 reviews for this documentary on IMDB are from user accounts that are just a few weeks old? The reviews with a lower score don’t follow that same trend. I can’t think of a reason why this would happen.
Thank you Eric for giving Dan so much material to debunk, it's great entertainment 😆
I hate when NASA reps say "We don't have the technology" to go further than low earth orbit. The correct word is not technology... the correct word is HARDWARE. /smh
n. The application of science, especially to industrial or commercial objectives.
n. The scientific method and material used to achieve a commercial or industrial objective.
Both definitions fit perfectly
@@tiaxanderson9725 a rectangle will fit in a square hole, but a square will fit better. While”technology” in context will work, “hardware” is more specific and limits the potential misrepresentation. We DO have the technology if you’re talking computer power, but we don’t have a rocket large enough at the moment. We lack the hardware.
@@tiaxanderson9725 They do, but the implication that is often drawn from the statement; "We don't have the technology..." is that we don't know how to, which is completely wrong.
That's what the OP is referencing, I think.
I think the correct word is the MONEY. Money can buy engineering time to create the hardware.
actually, they say "we can't send manned missions higher than LEO SAFELY".
SAFELY.
and the Apollo missions were unsafe, at least by their CURRENT standards.
"Every image of space that you see on Google is computer generated."
Absolutely true.
Every image of ANYTHING on Google is computer generated.
Every image anywhere online is computer generated.
Any image on your hard drive is computer generated.
Any image taken with a digital camera is computer generated.
Any image scanned from hard copy and stored digitally is computer generated.
That's what a digital image literally is. Doesn't mean the images are fake.
That’s not what they mean by computer generated…I hope you understood that.
@@jerryrush892 lol I see a lot of fanatics here, glad you aren’t one of them
I love how the globe deniers think we live in a snow GLOBE…
They are the joke that keeps on giving laughs.
And they have flerfers all AROUND the world! 🤣😂🤣😂
I like how ball huggers think they on a spinning space ball. It's really funny
@@flatearthanswers well, it's a rotating oblate spheroid that's in space and not that funny, but sure. It's demonstrable and proven but you keep believing nonsense from thousands of years ago. Also, stop using your cell phone, tv, streaming services, the internet (including RUclips), GPS, and everything else that uses satellites in outer space, put there by space missions, that are in orbit around the globe. Put your money where your mouth is. Now that would be funny!
Better a ball hugger than a frisbee thrower…
"Super easy, barely an inconvenience" Love it. Ryan George is a treasure.
That would be a great PITCH MEETING.
@@allwaizeright9705 Flat Earth Pitch Meeting would be amazing.
"The earth is flat now, I decided."
Wow wow wow
@@timgargac2766 wow
@@alienbob21 flattening the planet you live on is TIGHT
"Every single image we show you is CGI.." shimmer around the border of his head as he turns for effect. Nice Job!
Yep, they are very good at proving CGI is used by using CGI themself.
As I'm watching this on my computer screen, the images I see are for sure generated by my computer.
@@maxine_q ^
'super easy, barely an inconvenience!'
hey that's the line from the thing!
I recognize that thing, so I liked that line!
Easter eggs from Pitch Meeting are tight!
Wow wow wow
Oh recognising things is tight!
I'm really interested to know how the made these CGI images of space in the days before CGI existed.
The old pictures were either matte paintings or similar trickery. The "it's CGI"-thing is simply a stubborn dismissal and no evidence will ever be enough. Some flerfers want a camera on a rocket going into space. After they saw that they now want it rotating and panning around. After they will see that it will still just be "CGI". The key issue is the utter and total disbelief of everything.
Maybe they used an Etch A Sketch.
@@Bollibompa "They want a camera on a rocket going to space"
*Wildly gestures at SpaceX Falcon 9 launches
@@DARTHMOBIUS They don't deserve that, they won't believe it anyway.
@@DARTHMOBIUS That would end in one of two ways:
1. The flerf denies everything he experiences.
2. The flerf is convinced, but the other flerfs deny the flerf was ever really a flerf.
"Clearly it is too difficult to focus a camera."
Classic! :D
Love the name! My favorite 80s Dallas Maverick! 🏀
Yeah, like their other favorite, "Why can't we see stars in the same picture as the Apollo astronauts on the moon?"
Because they're much better photographers than that!! They know how to adjust lens aperture and shutter speed to get a decent exposure. Unlike a flerfer that goes out and spends money on a p9000 and doesn't bother learning how to use it.
If any of these guys ever figured out what a Users Manual was for, then someone like Bob Noodle & Co. wouldn't have "discovered" multiple suns when not knowing how to use a telescope.
@@jasonsabbath6996Usually nobody knows...
@@detlefschrempf5387 I grew up in Dallas! He was a hell of a player!
HAHAHAHAHA i love that "super easy, barely an inconvenience" reference :D
Ryan George references are TIGHT!
Wow wow.... Wow wow wow
That bit when the guy starts badgering that other guy for selling pictures that are available for free is really irksome. I wish somebody in that line woulda spoke up, "yo brother! We're not being duped into buying a free picture. We're getting the memory of meeting a person that did some cool sh*t, and getting a momento to remind us of the good things humanity is capable of. Not only did you just insult all the work that man put into his life, when there were so many other roads to go down, but you just called me an idiot too."
45 minutes! You spoil us, Dan!
this is like watching a tag team fight of pro wrestlers vs a bunch of 10 year olds just taking turns bashing heads in
6:00 “Super easy, barely an inconvenience!”
Nice.
Tight
Wow Wow Wow... Wow!
The pictures of planets out of focus is funny. A couple years back, one of our cameramen at a NASCAR race turned the camera to the sky and was able to zoom in and focus on Jupiter, there are even a couple of it's moons in the image. I had to grab a screenshot because it was so cool. These people really need to use the right equipment for the task they are attempting.
Understanding that flerfs are desperate, ignorant and needy for exceptionalism, it's super easy barely an inconvenience!
30:49 What's wrong with life being an "Accident"? If anything that's more amazing than "Some omnipotent being was bored one day"
My parents told me that I was "an accident", and I turned out okay.
Then the god just left and let's kids die in the dirt. And worse
We just happened to be in the right place at the right time. Life exists here only because the conditions can support it
Awesome Dan, Ive been waiting for the second part of you shredding that farcical "documentary" to pieces.
"do we need to explain everything to flerfs?"
yes. apparently.
Let's try this one more time Dougal, er I mean flat earther... this is small, that is far away... ah forget it!
*"the granddaughter of her grandfather"*
~Santos Bonacci
I like how he uses the phrase "stupid beyond your wildest imagination," which is a total oxymoron.
"oh you're that guy" that dude is doing exactly what should be done with flat earthers confronting you. Just ignore them, and don't even bothering giving them enough respect to remember them clearly.
Now I feel the need for a Flat Earth Pitch Meeting.
Flat Earths are tight!
@@GeeVanderplas she is……….oops I mean yes they should
“So look at the difference in the apparent sizes of the faces inside the exact same helmet. Any idea why Eric? Sit cross legged and think about it for a second. Of course it’s refraction. Super easy, barely an inconvenience”
Using other youtubers catchphrases is TIGHT!
Super tight!
@@SpaceManWyo so the earth is flat you say
the earth is flat i decided
what evidence do you have about that
oh i'll need you to get off my back about that thing
ok i'll get off of that thing
TIDY even.
“So why is the government lying about the true nature of the world?”
“Because.”
“Fair enough!”
"Where's gravity at with butterflies?" Best like of the"doc".
Hey Dan, might be nice to link to the other creators channels in the description...they would all love some extra subs.
The "hanging from harnesses" talking point always baffles me; I would well imagine people might tie themselves to something when they're FLOATING IN ZERO GRAVITY. Whereas if nobody ever did, that would be comparably unusual.
There's a part 2?! Damn.
This should be the only film to win all Razzie awards past present and future.
Part 3 is coming too
Also one of the things these flerfs can't explain with their so called "Density and Buoyancy" is how do objects weigh more at the poles than they do at the equator? This can easily be explained by a Centrifugal force due to the Earth's rotation, but not on a stationary plane and their so called "Density and Buoyancy"
Leaving a comment in order to generate "engagement" and feed the algorithm so google show THIS before THAT documentary
@QED And so is THIS -- FE is too obnoxiously unwilling to be reasoned with (Ranty notwithstanding) so we add comments and click thumbs and fade them into the 'level backwater' of the web from whence they come
It took me AGES to find part 2 because it had a different name and no link. Glad it popped up just now on its own!
Must have been its relative density!
"Super easy, barely an inconvenience" HA! Space Walk Pitch Meeting!
Matt Powell has a giant inflatable banana in his back yard that he calls Dr. Peel
A highly qualified inflatable banana !
"the Ocean, as far as I know, doesn't have wings" - this sentence killed me :D
flerfl: But how do you know?! HaVe yOu TesTeD aLL oCEan DrOpS?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
oh, Professor Dave said that too!
The really frightening part of Eric's narrative is the possibility of it becoming part of the world's view. Consider the classic Sci-Fi novel 'the Chrysalids' and if you read the backstory, you discover that the whole premise of their way of life, wasn't based on logic or reasoning. It was based on one person's opinion, (which turned out to be flawed), written down and discovered years after his death. His wasn't the smartest or the most intuitive or even the most honest view. It turned out his was the loudest voice or the only surviving voice after the apocalypse and since it was discovered by uneducated, fanatical, easily swayed sheep; it became the ACCEPTED view. It became enmeshed in the dominant religion and each caused the other to thrive.
Where have we seen this before.....? Oh that's right.....Baghdad, 800-1100 A.D. the greatest seat of scientific advancement the world has ever known until the fall of Baghdad to the barbarian hordes. And whose voice was loudest and tied to the religion at the time? Al-Ghazali, a great cleric and teacher who unfortunately believed that "the manipulation of numbers is the tool of the devil'
800 years later....where does Baghdad fall in the scale of scientific advancement today?
9:47 NASA gets 52 million dollars of taxpayer money,but they can't remove a glitch from a footage, I think nasa really does not pay it's video editors
That's also ignoring that if NASA were faking it they could just not provide a video at all. Not that many people watch the livestreams of the spacewalks. The flerfs think NASA pays a ton of money to make these "fake" videos not many people watch in order to fool "everyone" when NASA could simply not do a livestream and barely anyone would notice.
@@davebcf1231 That is the the thing that I don't get. Nobody is witnessing or meeting people who talk about space exploration in their everyday life. Same thing goes for TV and schools. Most of my knowledge about space that I have learned is from reading science books, astronomers, physicist or the internet.
@@davebcf1231 The same argument could be applied to space exploration itself. If "they" were trying to fool us into thinking we lived on a globe to "hide God" why would "they" have bothered "faking space" at all? They apparently managed with this deception perfectly well right up to WW2 without faking a fraudulent space programme.
@@davidfaraday7963 The flerf answer to that is that they think it's a scam for money. They don't understand economics any better than they understand science, so the idea that we see a huge return on that investment is something they can't even begin to grasp.
@@davebcf1231 Yup, like Daniel Pratt saying that they should give HIM (LOLOLOLOL) the money and that he will "teach" people how to live of the land WITHOUT WORKING XD
I love the people they feature as though they're some kind of experts when they're not even close. A tattoo artist, some dude that drinks piss, and Eddie Bravo, a martial artist. Is this supposed to be convincing?
These guys are revered by the FE community because they have no science background. Science is the enemy of flat earth. Idiots!
eric must have gotten absolutely humiliated one day by a teacher or someone in school, and from that day on, he vowed to teach himself and just quit the third grade.
"If you can fake sincerity, you've got it made." That's a Pratchett quote isn't it?
Paraphrased: “Gravity is strong enough to hold oceans to the Earth’s surface, but it can’t hold a helium balloon?”
Is this person seriously suggesting that the buoyancy of a helium balloon will propel it to escape velocity?
Of course, he asks this immediately after suggesting that the Earth’s rotational rate of .0007 RPM should provide sufficient centrifugal force at the equator to fling skyscrapers out into space. So, not the sharpest bulb in the cake.
“99.9% of the religious people on Earth appeal to the scientific consensus regarding the beginning of the universe and the beginning of life...”
I would be _really_ interested in seeing the details of the poll that yielded that statistic.
If the figure stated were 50%, I _might_ buy that.
“None of our ancestors had the tools to measure the Earth, and the leisure or privilege to actually think about it.”
Uh… Eratosthenes?
And _none_ of our ancestors had “the leisure or privilege to actually think about it”? Does this guy have brain damage or something?
“But there is not even one Bible verse that has flat Earth in it.”
Unless he is stating that the words “flat Earth” do not literally appear in the text of the Bible, this claim is just patently false.
There is more than one verse that describes the Earth this way. And, more to the point, the Biblical perception absolutely _was_ of a flat Earth. Specifically, they viewed the Earth as an inverse snowglobe: a flat, disc-shaped world, held up on pillars extending down into “The Deep”, and covered by the “firmament”, a crystalline dome containing the Sun, Moon, planets, and stars, which held out the water they thought filled outer space, or atleast their pale conception of it.
Give us the evidence proving the earth is flat. No evidence. It blows my mind that people believe the earth is flat. 🤯
I laugh every time they bring up "the science of density"
I yelled at my phone when they declared that the cruise ship was less dense than water...
@@jimbob0i0 haha. And it all completely falls apart but just asking why a ball surrounded by air falls down every time.
My 8 year old daughter has a better grasp on science than the flearfers
Density is a legit concept in physics, but flatters get it as well as they get optics or basic geometry... not at all.
@@deGooder Exactly. It should fall up, into the less dense air above it.
Oh my! Wasn't expecting to see a collaboration with Guru Larry. 🤔
"super easy, barely an inconvenience"
d-
did you just-
Yes, he did!
Wow, wow, wow. Wow!
Documentary blown so far into orbit that it gets a view of the globe!
The line from the AC to the DC is the Highway to Hell
I thought that was the line that makes you . . . Thunderstruck!
30:48 Santos, the nicest and smartest person in the world, who totally didn't threaten to kill anybody, or drop enough C words to make an Aussie Sailor blush.
"Everything since the 60's has been CGI...", _really_ Eric, *the 60's?* Explain 60's monster movies then, or hell, _Star Trek,_ that really look like CGI to you? What, NASA had a bigger budget than Hollywood? Are you _sure_ you don't have a head injury...?
Lol so I guess George Lucas didn't Create ILM which set the standard for CGI in movie's. The standard was set in the 60's and not done with Star Wars.
@@NickJaime I didn't say Star *Wars,* I said Star _Trek,_ the television series from the 60's. Yes, technically the first "CGI" appeared in Hitchcock's "Vertigo" in 1958, but what that _was,_ and what Eric _means_ when he says CGI, are two completely different things. Perhaps I should have been more clear, the CGI that existed in the 60's was too crude to accomplish what he seems to think it could. He's applying today's technological _capabilities_ to the _technology_ of 50 years ago.
This weekend starts off EPIC!
Good Lord Dubay and his band of fools are just painful. It’s Dunning-Kruger all the way down.
it must be getting awfully crowded on the summit of mount stupid.
This is priceless.....classic comedy at its best....thank you Dan for the entertainment.....the best video is when his wife tells him to shut up and get in the car.....he doesnt argue....hmmm
Eric's video sure was creepy and cringy all at the same time.
I can't believe we live in a time where the words "flerfies" and "globies" should exist...
6:00 “Super easy, barely an inconvenience” 😂
Bravo, sir
The first ten space tourist flights should be reserved for flerfs--including Dr. Peel.
There is literally so much debris circling the globe that if we don't do something to clean it up it may one day become impossible to launch vehicles into space.