Netflix Unfrosted The Pop Tart True Story And Ending Explained
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 22 май 2024
- Unfrosted The Pop Tart True Story And Ending Explained, In 1963 Michigan, business rivals Kellogg's and Post compete to create a cake that could change breakfast forever.
#Netflix #Unfrosted #JerrySeinfeld
0:00 INTRO
01:17 ENDING EXPLAINED
01:47 Story True?
02:36 POP TART FAMOUS?
Subscribe To Our Channel:
/ moviesvibes
Movies Vibes thousands of videos on latest hollywood news, Reviews, Top 10 lists, Origins, Tips, How To’s, Reviews, Commentary and more on Pop Culture, Celebrity, Movies, Music, TV, Film, Video Games, Politics, News, Comics, Superheroes. Your trusted authority on ranking Pop Culture.
Our Social Media:
/ moviesvibes
/ movvibes 
Развлечения
Unfrosted is a hilarious satire film of the story behind the making of Pop-Tarts which was actually a huge thing in the 60’s. It can be corny at times but in the best way! And the cast is amazing! Definitely added to my list of movies to show our little one in a few years! Also, I agree with the either your get the funny or you don’t. Alll the negative reviews to me are people who lost their sense of stupid, slap stick humor. It’s not nearly as painful as people put it. I really just feel this genre isn’t as well received as it has been in the past.
I really liked it!
Though I am not a fan of the director/lead actor and not ordinarily a fan of satire, I loved this movie. But I am of an age (65) at which I lived through the birth of the many, many cultural references in the film, including and especially Kellogg's Pop Tarts and Post's Country Squares (later called Toast'em Pop Ups). So I was able to appreciate the references and connections, despite some of those references being extremely obscure. Those under 50 or so are very unlikely to remember Jack LaLanne and his iconic jumpsuit with upturned collar, the Stingray bicycle with banana seat and wheelie bars, the necklaces made of candy pearls, the "reducing" Vita Master electric massage roller machine, how very popular Tang really was, and so many other oddities from the 1950s and 1960s. Even the inclusion of the "Mad Men" characters Don Draper and Roger Sterling will likely be lost on anyone under 40. I am not even sure that contemporary audiences will "get" all of the comedic references to "January 6," though Tony the Tiger dressed as the Q-Anon shaman was pure comedic gold and made me spit with laughter.
It’s Gggreat! Like most great comedy, you either “get it” or you don’t. For us, it easily passed the six-laugh test, we were chuckling from the very start and continued right to the end. The cast are all really strong and there are some clever cameos, and great impressions of notable 20thC persons. The storyline is ridiculous but a lot of fun (although we didn’t need the ravioli sub-subplot). But what really sells this are the clever, knowing nods to Americana and pop culture in a simpler time, mixed with some contemporary winks - Tony the Tiger (a sublime Hugh Grant) crossed with a Jan 6 insurrection vibe is very funny. I reckon it’s a film that will do very well on repeat viewings when you find more of the gags and hidden Easter Eggs.
I gave it a 5 because it made me laugh out loud. I was not a big Seinfeld fan but his comments about comedy today are very relevant. He spoofed and made fun of everyone and everything. Lighten up folks, it’s comedy!
Some characters were a bit over the top as some mentioned like Hugh Grant and Amy Schumer but they were still funny.
When they poked fun at Jackie O, I almost cried. I grew up in a large Catholic family in the 60s and 70s so that was almost sacrilegious. They even poked fun at Walter Cronkite, nothing and no one was off limits!
The producers of Barbie should take note, if you make a campy sequel, this is how it’s done.
Go ahead and boycott Jerry if you must. He’s got enough money and retired but I for one am waiting for his next one. Loved the cameos.
i don’t like Seinfeld but i truly enjoyed this movie
This was one of the cleanest, funniest movies in a LONG while...albeit, if you didn't grow up during a certain time Era, most of the puns might be lost on ya!!!...relevance is KEY to the barrel laughs in this movie...sooo...with that said...the newer generations may just see this film as nitty witty nonsense, and be lost in the whole thing!...but, for us older generations, the historic and pop references are a trip back to our childhood!!...PROPS to Peter Dinklage and Gafigan!!...they were outstanding!!...I mean, the whole cast was insanely picked!...but, for Jim's acting and Dinklage's talent...whoa....pretty GRRRReat!!!(I had to do it...)
Melissa will for ever be classic beloved Melissa...Seinfeld-well, his name is synonymous with comedy...and everyone else!...I could name the whole list!.
I had a lot of fun watching this!!....DEFINATELY, not one to take as a serious thinking film...but sometimes, we need to just unplug, and laugh.
This. Is. Painful.
I'm 108 minutes in and begging for the end.
I gave it a whole hour. Not once has this instruction-manual of a tale raised it's ceiling to crack any light in.
For a film whose premise seems to be 'silly' and 'fun', there's none of that on screen. There's no sparkle or unplanned moments. Gaffigan does as best anyone could. It's not enough. He needs smaller sets and quicker payoffs.
This is what every improv student is hammered with on their first day: Do Not Tell The Procedure ( don't tell us what you're going to do in the scene).
We watched Unfrosted last night and loved it!!!! I feel like this movie was made for my generation. There were so many time period related inside joke and memories that we were laughing at: references to candies, shows, magazines, that brought us down memory lane as we laughed. I feel like this is classic Seinfeld. If you watched the tv show or have seen "The Bee Movie" you are going to enjoy the ride though his hilarious mindscape. I also loved the retro colors and set design, the acting and the camera work. 10 thumbs up!!! I'm just all thumbs about this movie!!!
Everything I read had me welcoming Seinfeld's debut feature. While I thought that a war between Kellog and Post over Pop Tarts was a stretch, when I saw the list of the full cast at the end of the trailer, I was sold...pop it on tonight. Oh Dear! This overproduced saccharin-slick mess was shockingly bad. It is a string of gags that did not produce a single organic laugh. Jerry is working too hard or not hard enough. Oh wait! Then it came to me - - - - his outing seemed to reek of BARBIE envy!! I can just see Seinfeld sweating head to toe, watching as the Barbieland romp and sweetness delivered cultural blow after blow to our jagged and overexercised anxieties. I can hear him saying "I can do that!!" But Gerwitz's story and characters had arcs...they traveled from here to there, with McKennon and American Ferrara adding true madcap dark comedy and a six-minute morality tale. From Barbie floating down to the street, to her arrival in Birkenstocks to a brave new world...All of us were learning something, while Gerwig delivered a devilishly clever takedown of how MEN have lost their way, But the genius of BARBIE is that it was created by screenwriters...not joke writers. For me, actors weren't acting they were telling jokes or working from one SNL skit to the next, Massively talented cast in a risky undertaking and an even worse result. I predict that NO ONE will see this movie, word of mouth will tank it and Netflix will be licking its wounds! Mr. Seinfeld is a titan, We can hope, if he wants, to get another chance.
I liked the movie. I thought some of the 60's jokes (which, even as a Gen Z, I did understand-they take minimal knowledge of some common 60's tropes to get) were funny, the Capitol Insurrection reference was almost "Anchorman 2"-level stupid and random, but it was still goofy. Same thing with the whole Kennedy thing and the funeral. Funniest of all is the entire idea of someone making a movie about the creation of the Pop-Tart, which is just so Jerry Seinfeld. But the little jokes ("$200-a-year college", "airbags are an insane idea") were kind of where the movie's actual funny writing stops. The only other thing that made the movie a little better/more enjoyable for me was the star power-as a comedy fan, I liked Seinfeld, Gaffigan, Armisen, and Schumer. Ronny Chieng's appearance was unexpected but didn't really feel exactly... necessary, given that it was such a small role. The other A-list actors were enjoyable.
The ravioli sub-plot is just random and unnecessary. I'm guessing Seinfeld added that for the little kids, but this movie is still PG-13 and not really for little kids anyway (you have to be a little older to understand some of the regular jokes.) Also, the movie starts off making you actually care who invents the Pop-Tart first, but like 20 minutes in, you stop caring, because you know what's going to happen. They could've done the actual story a lot better instead of watering it down with absurdity.
I get it, Seinfeld was trying to take something that, in reality, really wasn't that interesting, and make it funnier-that's what comedy is. But it was just a little too overdone, like a Pop-Tart put in the toaster for 4 instead of 3. Still, if you're able to look past the criticism and just enjoy it for what it is on the surface, it really is a funny, ridiculous movie of the creation of the Pop-Tart. Three stars.
It tried, but it fails, because it's going for high camp and misses. (If you want to see a movie that does it spectacularly well, watch "Down With Love".) Seinfeld is just too far a natural comedic persona to pull off camp - in this movie he either underplays or tries way too hard. McCarthy - who at this point I will call the movie saver - is good at it and once she arrives, the movie does improve.(Also, James Marsden is good at it too, having already been in the high camp "Enchanted".) But the klunky eye-rolling bits still happen. It's akin to the first time driving a stick-shift, it gets rolling but is annoyingly awkward stop-and-go for the rest of the way. Some things work great, but others are just wincingly bad. It's as if Seinfeld wrote something he thought was "soooo clever" and he was so pleased with himself that no one dared veto him on anything. Wish they had. (And also, please, please, stop with the kids giving adult-like-dialog; that schtick is bad and at best comes off as kid actors giving bad line delivery. However, in fairness, as an example of something that works in the movie: the mad men tribute/scene where they come up with a name for the product. Very funny.)
Dumb movie overall, useful just for time consumption & being mildly entertained. Disenheartened with the antics that bordered insanity -which was desired> but why not make more credible? Try!
Next time, be cognizant of every generation needing some humor, but also infused intellectually for well thought out storylines. So much could have been infused with any of the mishmosh happening in here.
Maybe much easier to wait for ai to configure nowadays. Everything in it feels so trashy
speaking of that> a theme very unneccesary and gross disgusting just a mistake to add at all.
Or is this the resulting product of configurated story for movie ideas?? If so, like other news sites incongruent facts and not staying on point is WORRYsome...most of this so sadly falling short of what could have been- and should have been so much better...
Imagine just spoofing the advertising or product power without politics of today. Stay within the time frame ..can mock so much of the pertinent issues effectively. Most had no reason to be... expected better from a such a grrrreat cast.