'Here's what these movies looked like before special effects were added' - there must be about 4 seconds that actually shows what these movies looked like before special effects were added.
"What great movies look like without special effects". Then 90% of the video is movie clips WITH the special effects, and some guy talking non-stop...does he breathe?
CGI can be beautiful when done right and I understand that for some scenes it's necessary to use but sometimes practical effects are just unbeatable and so much more appreciated for the effort that goes into making them. I just hate when movies get CGI so wrong to the point where it actually takes effort to fuck it up that bad. While I'm not completely against the use of CGI, I do think they should use a bit more practical effects instead. But again, like I said, when it's done right, CGI can turn a movie into something that's beautiful and attention grabbing and again, I know for some of the scenes, it is necessary to use CGI and I really don't mind I mean when it's done right, I actually really enjoy it cuz I know how much effort went into it and I know it's a lot of work to pull off. Great video by the way, thanks for uploading it, I really enjoyed watching it.
Always love to watch what LOOPER puts together, the Behind the Scenes clips truly show how far CGI has come over the years. Would love to see a LOOPER video showing a Behind the Scenes of how they gather the raw footage, ie: green screen, actor comments, etc. As well as the information gathered and time it takes to produce a typical YT video. Thanks for all the hard work you put into your productions and the information you share with your viewers.
It's amazing how much work they put into NOT having to use actual locations or objects anymore. Characters in a car? CGI the background. Characters in an office? CGI the view out the window. Characters on a bridge? CGI it. Car crash? CGI. Plane/helicopter? CGI. Big crowd of extras? CGI. Another decade or so and movies will 100% CGI with the "stars" faces CGIed onto the bodies of stand-ins. They'll get paid a million+ to let the studio take photos of their faces and record their lines in a sound studio, then computer techs will do the rest.
lurk> the biggest thing I've found notable are car tv adverts, many are now completely CGI. No models of car featured, involved at all. Movies might get there one day in having simulated actors dead or alive look and sound accurate, but getting a 'sim' to move and act well, may still be a challenge. Movies without their CGI, taking away the impressive stunts and wires involved, perhaps most shocking of all look very cheap, especially when you realise their overall massive budget. This tends to bring home the fact that the cast (at least the main actors) are greatly overpaid, and crew often well overstaffed. With the tech of today some might argue even fan-made or indie based media (movies, videogames, tv shows) are starting to be able to compete and catch up with the average major release. I'd say hollywood is losing a lot when it comes down to lack of engaging scripts, relatable characters and non-generic remakes-rehashed sequels. Not bothering to use real locations or real fire-water-car crashes etc seems lazy, although you could argue it's partly down to the safety of the crew. The ones behind the scenes involved in all the art and CGI are the backbone of so many movies. That's where the money should go. A movie is no doubt made far sooner today, time is a great deal of money in hollywood and all that matters to those at the top
+MrVidification, The Don - CGI is being used for just about everything today. If there's a scene in a high-rise, there's a 50/50 chance that it's a set in a studio with the view out the window being CGI (note, CGI can include using computers to composite real images into a scene, it doesn't have to involve 3D rendering), for no reason other than that they didn't want to be bothered finding a real location. Robert Downey Jr's Iron-Man costume is almost all CGI now. Most shots of the character where you can't see his face are 100% CGI, even if he's not doing anything that couldn't be accomplished with a costume. Even if they create an actual costume for an alien character, CGI will be used to add all sorts of extra details, animate the face, etc. If a movie has a beautiful sunset, chances are that it was painted in a computer. Why bother to look for a prime location and wait for the right lighting when you can just have a tech create it for you? And while full CGI bodies can't yet be perfectly animated and CGI rendered faces still don't look 100% convincing, they've pretty much perfected using computers to put one person's face on someone else's body. Need five copies of the same person in a single shot? No problem! Get four stand-ins with similar bodies and just paste the original actor's face on them. Designing and rendering convincing 3D images may not be that easy, but changing a scene by inserting or removing elements, or changing the lighting, is pretty much child's play for the companies that do the CGI for movies. It used to be that if you saw something that you knew was impossible by real-world standards (even accounting for special effects), it was probably CGI. Now, a scene of two characters walking through a park probably has had a dozen changes made to it using computers. Remove some people in the background, add some clouds, make the grass greener, change the skyline, tweak the trees a little, erase their breath showing that it was 30F out, etc. By the time they get done messing with it, they might as well have just shot it in a studio in front a green screen.
Jungle Book is my favourite. To create an entire jungle and animals and rivers and for a small boy to play it out so well that I even thought some were real is mind blowing.
Ryan Umentum Ikr,i mean how hard is it to have a decent plot with all the time they get,it's not.CGI is ok if it's convincing with good acting and story.
What a brilliant way to get people to view the clip! Put the words "great movies" in the title with a thumbnail of Suicide Squad and just watch people leap in just so they can add an angry comment. Genius!
Wow, layering a dark blurring filter with some quote nobody cares about over the footage people clicked this link to see.... truly quality video making guys. Stellar.
Paige Cooper You might be right. I always thought it looked abit weird, like her head & body were two different things moving simultaneously. Boo, they didn't even show her dancing without CGI... 👎
Gotta love that hive mind mentality. I bet half of therm enjoyed the movie until they went online and saw people bitching. "oh ya, i didn't like it either!"
Look at the channel name. I also noticed too late. somehow this keeps popping up in reccomended eventhough I selected many times that I'm not interested.
In my opinion the suicide squad's (Jarrett Letto) was the worst kind of joker. He seemed more like a sleazy pimp than the clown prince of crime. There was nothing brilliant, whitty or insanely brilliant about him.
Came to see how the movies would look like without special effects but all I saw was the movies with the effects and herd a guy y’all nonstop giving you a lesson a on cgi
Personally, i loved Mad Max! Saw him in the cinema, got the dvd after with the scenes behind the screen, all of that and i was just amazed because of the great work they put on!
The original Robocop's practical effects still blow all these 'great' movies and their CGI out of the water. Murphy's death scene alone was so elaborate with its headshot to the 'dummy' of Alex that it makes people sitting at a screen and mashing away to create CGI effects look like like the magic and mastery of making movie effects has gone backwards.
i don't get why Elysium is catching flak, it made 94Mil in USA Alone, that is almost 80% of its budget. the movie made a total of 286M worldwide, which is like twice its budget
damarh Definition of profit has nothing to do with the actual accounting of profits. Firstly all the money the film made at the box office is not going to the studio, it's usually just given a rough estimate that half of the money goes back to the studio. Secondly, there are other expenses outside of production costs such as marketing and distribution expenses. Finally, even the director admitted the film was a flop and took the blame for it.....
It's horrible that it said that Elysium was a failure one of my favorite movies ever, the graphics the storyline Everything is Awesome about it , its my Style of movie not everyone's cup of tea
Hotel fight scene in Inception is an example where director did not yield to CGI effects. Instead, that scene was shot in actual rotating set that was the most incredible in making.
Patriot Cat True, movie in deed are *very* subjective, but to give some context to my somewhat sarcastic comment, I did in fact see “Suicide Squad” in theaters. The trailers and what not built up a bunch of hype and I got aboard the hype train and although I did kinda enjoy it when watching it, once a weeks time passed from when I saw it, I was really bummed. Sure, although the soundtrack was all over the place, it was pretty good as well as diverse. The first act was interesting and intriguing, the third/final act had some awesome action… Yet despite the aforementioned solid sections, the middle/second act was bloated, boring, nonsensical, and just plain dumb. Plus I felt uninterested due in part because the villain was something the U.S. government/the good guys (who you’re supposed to root for) in a sense “created” and are partially to blame for Enchantress coming to life… I score it in between a six and a seven, enjoyable sure, but not the cream of the crop… P.S. Like I said, I actually did go and watch it and I did see some bad reviews from critics, and still enjoyed it; I can think for myself because I’m not a spineless son of a bitch.
@Patriot Cat It's more deserving of being called a "great movie" than the shit in this video. Personally, I would say that Doctor Strange was a good to very good movie. "Great movie" is "Logan" or "Gladiator" territory, IMO.
I love how everyone is so focused on dumping all over Suicide Squad, that there is no immediately visible comment about that still frame of Jon Favreau screaming at Neel Sethi at the top of his lungs to represent Shere Khan during production lmfao
hold on, mad max: fury road is known to have used a miniscule amount of special effects, instead relying on practical effects and shooting every single scene for real. so why the hell is it on this list?
They used quite a lot of special effects in Fury Road. It was known for taking a minimalist approach, only using it when it would result in a better outcome, not just a more convenient one. They still used a heck of a lot of effects in that film, though.
I think all the vehicle related stuff was practical effects. Actually blowing up cars, rolling them, etc. The atmosphere was CGI a lot I think, IE the lightning storm.
This is literally the first footage I've ever seen of Elysium. Which might just mean I've been living under a weirdly Elysium-free rock, but might also mean their marketing was flawed.
What other movies would you want to see prior to their special effects being added?
Looper Green screens just like NASA
Looper STAR WAARS
Some movies that are REALLY great, please.
PROgram yesssss
Deadpool
'Here's what these movies looked like before special effects were added' - there must be about 4 seconds that actually shows what these movies looked like before special effects were added.
Yes. All he did was talk about the effects without showing much what it looked like without it.
True
Varinder
misleading title
"What great movies look like without special effects". Then 90% of the video is movie clips WITH the special effects, and some guy talking non-stop...does he breathe?
They talk about how realistic the hulk looked but then never showed him. Stupid!!!!!
@@mikey6482 3:50 .......what ?
Yeah I also only noticed too late that this is looper...
😂
Yeah, thats what looper does
“What Great Movies Look Like Without Effects” thumbnail photo is from Suicide Squad. Lol.
I just clicked to see if eveyone was saying that, lol
I want to see her cringy dance
Quite a few shit movies in this line-up to be honest...
I was thinking the same thing lmao
Yeah, what's your point? I thought it was a great movie. I may be the minority but Oh well :)
CGI can be beautiful when done right and I understand that for some scenes it's necessary to use but sometimes practical effects are just unbeatable and so much more appreciated for the effort that goes into making them. I just hate when movies get CGI so wrong to the point where it actually takes effort to fuck it up that bad. While I'm not completely against the use of CGI, I do think they should use a bit more practical effects instead. But again, like I said, when it's done right, CGI can turn a movie into something that's beautiful and attention grabbing and again, I know for some of the scenes, it is necessary to use CGI and I really don't mind I mean when it's done right, I actually really enjoy it cuz I know how much effort went into it and I know it's a lot of work to pull off. Great video by the way, thanks for uploading it, I really enjoyed watching it.
I Think we have a different definition of Great Movie
Some of those were good but some were bad movies
Yes, quotations on great movie
think its more about visually great movies.
yea its not about the story in this case its about the effects
Yep. I liked exactly 2 of those movies. Jurassic Park and The Martian. CGI more often ruins movies than not.
"How great movies look without special affects"
*Procedes to put Suicide Squad*
😂
along with 300: Rise of an Empire, the Robocop Reboot, Man of Steel etc, the majority of the movies in this video were terrible.
@AIMS 1 You're kidding right?
_proceeds to spell proceed wrong_
@@Noobie2k7 300: Rise of an Empire was great. So was Robocop Reboot
I always admired the effects teams.. They really do a fantastic job and are never thanked properly
Always love to watch what LOOPER puts together, the Behind the Scenes clips truly show how far CGI has come over the years. Would love to see a LOOPER video showing a Behind the Scenes of how they gather the raw footage, ie: green screen, actor comments, etc. As well as the information gathered and time it takes to produce a typical YT video. Thanks for all the hard work you put into your productions and the information you share with your viewers.
It's amazing how much work they put in to make a movie
It's amazing how much work they put into NOT having to use actual locations or objects anymore. Characters in a car? CGI the background. Characters in an office? CGI the view out the window. Characters on a bridge? CGI it. Car crash? CGI. Plane/helicopter? CGI. Big crowd of extras? CGI.
Another decade or so and movies will 100% CGI with the "stars" faces CGIed onto the bodies of stand-ins. They'll get paid a million+ to let the studio take photos of their faces and record their lines in a sound studio, then computer techs will do the rest.
lurk> the biggest thing I've found notable are car tv adverts, many are now completely CGI. No models of car featured, involved at all. Movies might get there one day in having simulated actors dead or alive look and sound accurate, but getting a 'sim' to move and act well, may still be a challenge. Movies without their CGI, taking away the impressive stunts and wires involved, perhaps most shocking of all look very cheap, especially when you realise their overall massive budget. This tends to bring home the fact that the cast (at least the main actors) are greatly overpaid, and crew often well overstaffed. With the tech of today some might argue even fan-made or indie based media (movies, videogames, tv shows) are starting to be able to compete and catch up with the average major release. I'd say hollywood is losing a lot when it comes down to lack of engaging scripts, relatable characters and non-generic remakes-rehashed sequels. Not bothering to use real locations or real fire-water-car crashes etc seems lazy, although you could argue it's partly down to the safety of the crew. The ones behind the scenes involved in all the art and CGI are the backbone of so many movies. That's where the money should go. A movie is no doubt made far sooner today, time is a great deal of money in hollywood and all that matters to those at the top
lurkerrekrul cgi isn't easy
+MrVidification, The Don - CGI is being used for just about everything today. If there's a scene in a high-rise, there's a 50/50 chance that it's a set in a studio with the view out the window being CGI (note, CGI can include using computers to composite real images into a scene, it doesn't have to involve 3D rendering), for no reason other than that they didn't want to be bothered finding a real location.
Robert Downey Jr's Iron-Man costume is almost all CGI now. Most shots of the character where you can't see his face are 100% CGI, even if he's not doing anything that couldn't be accomplished with a costume.
Even if they create an actual costume for an alien character, CGI will be used to add all sorts of extra details, animate the face, etc.
If a movie has a beautiful sunset, chances are that it was painted in a computer. Why bother to look for a prime location and wait for the right lighting when you can just have a tech create it for you?
And while full CGI bodies can't yet be perfectly animated and CGI rendered faces still don't look 100% convincing, they've pretty much perfected using computers to put one person's face on someone else's body. Need five copies of the same person in a single shot? No problem! Get four stand-ins with similar bodies and just paste the original actor's face on them.
Designing and rendering convincing 3D images may not be that easy, but changing a scene by inserting or removing elements, or changing the lighting, is pretty much child's play for the companies that do the CGI for movies. It used to be that if you saw something that you knew was impossible by real-world standards (even accounting for special effects), it was probably CGI. Now, a scene of two characters walking through a park probably has had a dozen changes made to it using computers. Remove some people in the background, add some clouds, make the grass greener, change the skyline, tweak the trees a little, erase their breath showing that it was 30F out, etc. By the time they get done messing with it, they might as well have just shot it in a studio in front a green screen.
It will be interesting when actors that become famous aren't even real people.
Jungle Book is my favourite.
To create an entire jungle and animals and rivers and for a small boy to play it out so well that I even thought some were real is mind blowing.
"Great Movie", and "Suicide Squad" must never be said in the same sentence.
That "great" adjective really is a sore for the eyes.
"Sucide squad isn't a great movie at all" :/
Detreck lol it absolutely sucks
Detreck Bad joke.
Detreck your funny
Blind reliance on CGI and terrible writing is killing movies.
This. I can't believe they spend millions on CGI while the scripts feel like they are written in a couple of days.
Ryan Umentum Ikr,i mean how hard is it to have a decent plot with all the time they get,it's not.CGI is ok if it's convincing with good acting and story.
I mean, yeah. That'll do it for ya.
Agree %100
Yeah, done right, cji MAKES a movie. Done wrong... Well, it's MADE.. a mess.
How the hell did they keep such straight faces with those dudes walking around in those goofy raptor suits? lmao
Celtic Noble ikr
It's called acting lol
this is the real reason why acting isn't easy
It’s probably funny for the first minute but then it’s just your job every day.
Where's the Avatar and Dr. Strange ?
Or Inception, which is pretty close to Dr. Strange
the avatar is encased in a giant iceberg, he was like that for 100 years
@@hotfire5788 Avatar In Iceberg and Dr. Strange in Time Lapse😂😂😂
Gaurav Tiwari m
What a brilliant way to get people to view the clip! Put the words "great movies" in the title with a thumbnail of Suicide Squad and just watch people leap in just so they can add an angry comment. Genius!
Yup, lotsa triggered people in the comment section.
LOL Yep!
Agreed, i thought i could see some "Great Movies Look Like Without Special Effects".
Wow, layering a dark blurring filter with some quote nobody cares about over the footage people clicked this link to see.... truly quality video making guys. Stellar.
Special Effects are done on set, Visual Effects are done in post🍻
No negativity from me. AWESOME VIDEO Looper! Thanks for sharing!
I honestly just came for that thumbnail lmao I wanna see Cara dancing like a bafoon.
Cromez23 I doubt that was her dancing. She's great and all but she doesnt have the hips to dance like that.
Paige Cooper You might be right. I always thought it looked abit weird, like her head & body were two different things moving simultaneously.
Boo, they didn't even show her dancing without CGI... 👎
All those people working on it and no one said hey, this shit looks goofy.
Mellow Lmao ikr!
Samme
95% of these comments: *"Suicide Squad isn't a great movie!"*
There. I just saved you a shitload of reading. You can move on to the next video now.
Bruh
@@gopinath9986 Not sure if your comment is an agreement, disagreement or just a simple lack of vocabulary.
Touchè.
Gotta love that hive mind mentality. I bet half of therm enjoyed the movie until they went online and saw people bitching. "oh ya, i didn't like it either!"
eureka0521 Pretty sure that’s EXACTLY what happened. The movie was not bad the actors were good, just the plot...
Suicide squad was not "great movie"... nor was it even a "good movie" ... it was just a 'movie'.
wow suicide squad was just a "movie", wow, any more amazing revelations?
Calling it a movie is it bit far now!... it was at best a teaser trailer.
Yes thank
Suicide squad was just a long winded promo
i loved it
Damn that was an amazing compilation
I don't know whats scarier a tiger rushing at you or a middle aged man
HAHAHAHAHA
That is so amazing. Whether they good movie's or not but the way it was put together that still makes it amazing.
I don't understand why you'd only mention how much a movie grosses domestically when it earns so much internationally too.
Michael Boyle ikr. A movie could make more money outside of the us as there are 6.5 bilion people in the rest of the world
Michael Boyle you want your products to make in your domestic market because global predictions are harder to calculate and therefore a bigger gamble
Yeah it clearly says that it grossed almost $300 million worldwide. How is that a failure when it made over twice as much as it cost to make?
Cool video looper, its amazing how much work they put in to make a movie
That thumbnail is all I need to know about this hahahaha
2:19 imagine being an actor and you’re surrounded with guys who pretends to be dinosaurs. I WOULD DEADASS JUST LAUGH. I JUST CANT.
THIs comment actually made me laugh lmaoo u right
I would too....until i realized I'm getting a check for millions of dollars
Being a Raptor, looks uncomfortable.
WatchWithGregg ?o
Great video as usual looper
“Great movies” features Suicide Squad in the thumbnail... hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Fantomex was about to say the same thing. Only reason i even clicked on the video
Fantomex pretty sure he did it on purpose so you will click the video and comment about it
even worse...it features the shitpile that was the robocom remake
come here to find this comment, was not disappointed
Hades no, looper has actually said they think suicide squad is good.
Just show us the footage, I don't need a history lesson.
Look at the channel name. I also noticed too late. somehow this keeps popping up in reccomended eventhough I selected many times that I'm not interested.
Exactly!
Suicide Squad "great movie"? Sure Jan
Facu AF irk its terible
It’s better than justice league
Alright now that we've seen the lack of special effects, where are the great movies?
Eduardo huh? Didn't you see suicide squad? Best movie ever hands down
Bruh. Avengers? mad max fury road? Spider man homecoming
E.t Good joke.
Eduardo Mad Max Fury Road, The Martian, and The Wolf Of Wall Street.
Great movie
Looper: Suicide Squad seems like a good idea
Pretty cool stuff man!
imagine you told someone that you're an actor and they're like "oh what movies are you in"
oh yep im a raptor in jurassic world
Almost shocking....I mean we know it happens, but wow to see it is something else. Great video.
suicide squad is a great movie ? dude...
dsahgkg I dont think so
Isaque Muniz WHY
THIS
IS
SPARTAAAAA
*kicks off edge *
Guy that got kicked: o damn o.o
Great movies? Pretty sure suicide squad (thumbnail) isn't great by any stretch of the imagination.
crimson bolt Will Smith was great.
Joker was great but not much screen time
What is this some kind of shit movie apologist squad?
In my opinion the suicide squad's (Jarrett Letto) was the worst kind of joker. He seemed more like a sleazy pimp than the clown prince of crime. There was nothing brilliant, whitty or insanely brilliant about him.
Disagree he was literally the worst joker but to each their own.
Really it's very smart work of directors to get the hardest work done.
Thank goodness Hulk doesn't look like the old rubber one.
2:20 She isn't wearing High Heels?!?!? the high heels then were intendend to be used as an intensional pun!!?? MIND-BLOWING!!!
Suicide Squad good?
kay Van trigt I saw it in the theatre and it was shit looked good but shit
Suicide Squad bad
kay Van trigt Yes.
kay Van trigt Yup correct
Bad
Came to see how the movies would look like without special effects but all I saw was the movies with the effects and herd a guy y’all nonstop giving you a lesson a on cgi
All this time, I thought Jon Favreau is just RDJ’s sidekick! Turns out he’s the director of ironman. Mind blown 🤯
Same, and he directed the Jungle Book as well.
😮😮😮 The CGI of Lion King is really remarkable!! 😮😮😮
I still cringe at cara delevinge’s suicide squad acting, especially that dancing part
i get anxiety when I see her dance
Yeah, her "mating dance" while she was casting spells was hard to watch.
You guys should watch scarlet witch bts😂
TheSpanishzombie i cringe at her acting in general, no offense to her but she should stick to modelling
Personally, i loved Mad Max! Saw him in the cinema, got the dvd after with the scenes behind the screen, all of that and i was just amazed because of the great work they put on!
Suicide Squad
Great Movie
Something's not right here
This is literally the only reason I clicked on this video and I'm thankfull I'm not the only one here
AntiqueT suicide squad is good
Tycho van Steeg I genuenly can't tell if you're being sarcastic
lol
I would hope it's sarcasm, but there are a surprising amount of people who actually like the movie.
The original Robocop's practical effects still blow all these 'great' movies and their CGI out of the water. Murphy's death scene alone was so elaborate with its headshot to the 'dummy' of Alex that it makes people sitting at a screen and mashing away to create CGI effects look like like the magic and mastery of making movie effects has gone backwards.
I'm offended Mad Max Fury Road was in this list. It has some of the most amazing physical effects ever.
It also said great movies. Which madmax is not.
their stunts are incredible
The way scorsese is using Special effects actually makes sence!
this comment gave me an aneurysm
@@lydiarupert4709 I hope the comment makes more cents than my life.
Yes love Cg. Love Superman all, Iron Man, Spiderman Homecoming, and Avengers all. The Hulk so good. Also, Suicide Squad & San Andreas.
‘Great movies’
Thumbnail: Suicide Squad: Cara Delevigne.
Me: ok.
When the first movie you mention is 300: Rise of an Empire, I knew the bar for "great movie" was going to be kind of low
And people use to make fun of mimes and their invisible walls....now everything is pretty much invisible.
if i was an actor for Jurassic World, i dont know how i would contain my laughter
i don't get why Elysium is catching flak, it made 94Mil in USA Alone, that is almost 80% of its budget.
the movie made a total of 286M worldwide, which is like twice its budget
it made 171M profit
It didn't make a profit lol.
Are we talking about elysium which had a budget of 115Mil and made 286Mil worldwide ? what is your definition of profit here ?
damarh Definition of profit has nothing to do with the actual accounting of profits. Firstly all the money the film made at the box office is not going to the studio, it's usually just given a rough estimate that half of the money goes back to the studio. Secondly, there are other expenses outside of production costs such as marketing and distribution expenses. Finally, even the director admitted the film was a flop and took the blame for it.....
I enjoyed it.
wow the wolf of wall street ones were the craziest to me!! what the
It's horrible that it said that Elysium was a failure one of my favorite movies ever, the graphics the storyline Everything is Awesome about it , its my Style of movie not everyone's cup of tea
Elysium was a financial failure. I haven't seen the movie so that's all I can say
Whats is remarkable is the realism of special effects of the original 1993 Jurssic Park is still unmatched today
I like how the director for 300: Rise of an Empire says "look realistic and complex", while its CGI look worse and faker than Attack of the Clones.
Hotel fight scene in Inception is an example where director did not yield to CGI effects. Instead, that scene was shot in actual rotating set that was the most incredible in making.
Someone forgot to put air quotes around the word “great.”
Patriot Cat True, movie in deed are *very* subjective, but to give some context to my somewhat sarcastic comment, I did in fact see “Suicide Squad” in theaters. The trailers and what not built up a bunch of hype and I got aboard the hype train and although I did kinda enjoy it when watching it, once a weeks time passed from when I saw it, I was really bummed. Sure, although the soundtrack was all over the place, it was pretty good as well as diverse. The first act was interesting and intriguing, the third/final act had some awesome action… Yet despite the aforementioned solid sections, the middle/second act was bloated, boring, nonsensical, and just plain dumb. Plus I felt uninterested due in part because the villain was something the U.S. government/the good guys (who you’re supposed to root for) in a sense “created” and are partially to blame for Enchantress coming to life… I score it in between a six and a seven, enjoyable sure, but not the cream of the crop… P.S. Like I said, I actually did go and watch it and I did see some bad reviews from critics, and still enjoyed it; I can think for myself because I’m not a spineless son of a bitch.
Mad Max: Fury Road is one of my favourite movies.
nothing is real anymore in movies.
Our technology has advanced greatly and they seem to be putting it to use with their own sense of creativity. I like it.
movies aren't real to begin with
It's terrible and garbage!
At least make it somewhat believable.
Despite several blockbusters, I think Jon Favreau is one of the most underrated filmmakers/actors working today.
The only spiderman who isnt british is toby... All actors who played spiderman was awesome though... I like spiderman and ironman.
Everything advanced crazy fast , I watch how movies shape our generations and influence them massively and realised why all of these.
what about doctor strange
what about it? doctor strange did not use cgi ^_-
For Doctor Strange magic was used.
what are you talking about, didn't u see Benedict Cumberbatch's interview where he told he had to go to the Himalayas to actually learn magic.
@Patriot Cat
It's more deserving of being called a "great movie" than the shit in this video.
Personally, I would say that Doctor Strange was a good to very good movie. "Great movie" is "Logan" or "Gladiator" territory, IMO.
Thr man with the raptor head. Hilarious
Only great movies on this list: Spider-Man Homecoming, The wolf of Wall Street, mad max fury road, the Avengers, The martian, The jungle book
Rowan Rosenblum well the only good thing about mad max is the action, and the Martian is a piece of dog shit
Clunt Westwood hahahahahahahahahahah
Rowan Rosenblum Spider-Man Homecoming was DOGSHIT and by far the worst Spider-Man movie ever.
Deric James hahahahahahahahaha 😂😂
I have a new respect for the movie industry and actors
Prediction: no actors/actresses needed in future because of the improvement of CGI
wow i'm happy that the actor who played happy on ironman is actually successfull person
I love how everyone is so focused on dumping all over Suicide Squad, that there is no immediately visible comment about that still frame of Jon Favreau screaming at Neel Sethi at the top of his lungs to represent Shere Khan during production lmfao
I believe I haven't watched many of these because I enjoy true, raw cinematography.
hold on, mad max: fury road is known to have used a miniscule amount of special effects, instead relying on practical effects and shooting every single scene for real. so why the hell is it on this list?
They used quite a lot of special effects in Fury Road. It was known for taking a minimalist approach, only using it when it would result in a better outcome, not just a more convenient one. They still used a heck of a lot of effects in that film, though.
I think all the vehicle related stuff was practical effects. Actually blowing up cars, rolling them, etc. The atmosphere was CGI a lot I think, IE the lightning storm.
So, you believe that toxic storm they were driving through was real?
4:56 Happy Hogan directed the Avengers? Preposterous!
did you even listen to the video lol
Why would u have a thumbnail like that with the word GREAT in the title lmao
Matt Scott because he knows you're gonna click to write an angry comment yet he still gets views.
well following that logic... they got me
The "woof" of Wall Street 😂 9:36
Wow, I didn't know happy directed iron man.
lo same
I came for the Thumbnail 😍
"What great movies look like without special effects"
*Shows Suicide Squad*
LMFAO Jon Favreau screaming!
okay
but why show clips of bad movies?
unbelievable and amazing effects ... BRAVO techniques
Since When is Suicide Squad a great movie
Lmao seeing Jon yell at a kid has me dying.
"Great movies"
*shows Suicide Squad in the thumbnail*
This video fits the zoomed in feature for the iPhone X
By the end of this century, movie acting itself would become a thing of the past.
It'll just be voice acting.
This is literally the first footage I've ever seen of Elysium. Which might just mean I've been living under a weirdly Elysium-free rock, but might also mean their marketing was flawed.
You forgot Interstellar.
current cinema has advanced very well in terms of special effects
Here's an unpopular opinion: Suicide Squad was the only interesting movie out of all of those imo
very unpopular opinion
Same
@@burritodog3634 he's probably trolling