Millions of people will eventually watch this video on RUclips, there's no need to say hi to individual people, they are not watching this great video for the "hellos" anyway.
I understand your frustration, but that's the power of live video on Facebook. It's interactive. Viewers on Facebook appreciate that they're acknowledged and have just joined in. Plus, they can ask questions while we're live and I can answer those questions as well. When you repost that video here on RUclips, you miss out on that "Live" opportunity and yes, you're right, it doesn't make sense when you're watching the replay here. Stick with it and you'll find you'll still get tons of great information.
Not at the price of disturbing/destroying your own speech, that is counterproductive; I really feel like thumbing down. Have too bad illness fatigue and insomnia to concentrate. Honestly, I have never seen the like of this, not even children would expect to be greeted when late. I even suspect it is just a hoax to give an illusion of many ppl joining.Which would be unnecessary too, since a good video is good independent on the number of views or likes. Have been looking for help/info f SO long, SO much and have little time and energy. Sad, because you seem nice with good content apart from that. Thanks.
Claudia's right. Look at it this way. YOU show up for a lecture ON TIME, and just as the lecturer gets to the point YOU came for, someone walks in, late. The lecturer suddenly stops, smiles and acts like he's just been dying for this latecomer to arrive. He starts over from the beginning! For example, right now, that's what happened to me. I hope "David" enjoyed the video. Me? I missed the whole point because I'm typing this. I'm out of here.
You really have to stop and interrupting yourself and repeating what you have already said every time a new person joins your session. Very distracting and it takes away from your very informative session.
Because of 7 or 8 people joining in and getting a personal recap of the story, 11,000+ people get the recaps too. Challenging watch. Great content in between though.
Sorry about that. Have created another video about three minutes long focusing on just the topic which should be coming out later this month. Thanks for your kind words.
You are breaking my concentration and you have so much valid points. Just get to the points and stop interjecting saying Hi, how are you it breaks my thoughts
If the question about prior criminal convictions is asked by opposing counsel at trial though, wouldn't counsel raise an objection on ground of relevancy? If they are asked about it in a depo, relevancy objections are improper. Shouldn't relevancy objections only be raised at trial, if opposing counsel attempts to enter testimonial evidence into the record that is outside the scope of the case?
It’s a totally appropriate question. It relates to credibility. The reason you make the objection of deposition is that a trial, if the opposing lawyer wants to read sections of the deposition, the objection has already been made and will be made again at trial.
Hey Adriana. You're right. Would you prefer instead I ignore those people who came to watch during their work hours or took time away from their family and not acknowledge them on a live video? I realize it interrupts the flow on this Facebook live video that you're now watching on replay here on RUclips and I'm sorry you don't get that edited, polished version of the content. I do want to thank you however for coming to watch and hope that the content was informative (besides the interruptions).
You should have created a separate video for RUclips. It’s a different platform. You wouldn’t act the same way in an informal meeting and in a court room. Your reaction to criticism is very defensive and rude! People are giving you feedback to help you in the future. They are not insulting you.
@@NYMedicalMalpracticewe would prefer for people to respect your and our time and show up on time so there can be fewer interruptions and distractions. The flow is great then gets thrown off with interruptions.
Wait...what? Was that a bunny rabbit I just saw? Hold on a second, someone just said Hi to me. Let me thank them for taking some time out of their life to watch my educational video, the way you just did. Thank you. If you were on the live broadcast and joined in, I most certainly would have acknowledged you and thanked you for taking the time to participate.
Gerry Oginski I have to agree with the others about the interruptions. (Even with Facebook Live it really isn't necessary to acknowledge people who are watching the video. I've watched many, many FB live videos where there weren't these interruptions.) Instead of getting defensive, may I suggest a "thank you" to commentators and say you'll do things differently next time? I went through a whistleblower lawsuit (jury found in my favor and against the hospital on all 6 counts), and one thing my attorney told me when we were going to trial was to not get defensive--it turns off the jury. Wise advice! That said, your video was very helpful and confirmed what I strongly believe, and what helped me throughout my 3-year-long legal ordeal--just tell the truth.
I understand many people were annoyed by the constant chattering with people signing on to his video. But that doesn't mean that the content of his video and spotted instructions wasn't very good material to know about.
@@NYMedicalMalpractice How does someone counter an obvious liar and crook, like yourself, that's trying to hide the truth from the jury by discrediting honest people that deserve to be heard and given compensation? Or are you honestly not aware that you are the bad guy here?
Sorry this is the first of the videos that I watch of yours that I could not finish watching. 50% seamed to be saying hi to everyone and then starting over again and again. But like I said the rest were all good, I just don't the time.
Thank you your video has given me hope. I am going through divorce and my ex is a habitual liar. I have been very straightforward, truthful and honest with my self and my attorney. Thank you sir.
Thank you for this video, I need to save this for my own reminders. I now realized how difficult to be a witness, so stressful to be in this situation...
Great Video. Would this include an expert report? The defense lawyer expert write's a report and during deposition doesnt say the same as his report. How do you handle that?
great videos!!! As a registered nurse of 18 years, new to the legal nursing field, your videos are both informative and entertaining. Thanks for posting!
As you might be able to tell, this was originally done on Facebook Live. It's appropriate to say hi to people who join your live broadcast to acknowledge them. I understand that watching the replay here on RUclips is awkward when I interrupt the content to stop and say hi. Sorry about that. Hope the information was helpful!
Thanks Julie. I love helping people understand how these cases work. I think every lawyer has an obligation to explain, in easy to understand language, how their type of case works. This way a viewer who is searching for that information can learn and decide for themselves who to call to ask more questions. Don't you agree?
It was a CIVIL case , They couldn't have treated that way in a criminal case. She actually she the wicked witch of the Pa Esq how big was the dialysis room my husband died in. I said as big as this room & half the other No she says I want dimensions ( I am not a surveyor I said I didn't know) ten minutes late she'd ask the same question over & over .I told her my husband got diabetes when he was 13. She asked what doctor he saw I said I was kid & grew up in chicago There should be judges at depositions to act as referees
Hi, Gerry, great presentation. I know I'm jumping in here a tad late but even though a plaintiff did not disclose his past crime to his lawyer, does that absolve the lawyer from asking his client in the early stages of the retainer as to whether his client has a past criminal record?
But the witness has a right to answer the question properly and explain why her answer has changed for example if I don’t remember certain facts at the deposition because I dint has chance to review my allegations from 4 years back then I can explain that I reviewed my complaint before trial date and now I can give a better answer or if I dint had chance to review documents that my attorney subpoena from the expert witness before the deposition but I reviewed before trial date then I can give a better answer because the documents will have all the facts of my case.
You could say that, but it still creates a credibility problem if you haven't reviewed the prior testimony. With deposition testimony, the witness is required to review it and make changes before signing it. This confirms that they have reviewed it before signing it.
A depo is offered for the value it holds, its a memorialization of legal witness testimony. it EQUALS the weight of ur testimony in court. It also carries same penalties for perjury etc. . I'd discuss w my boss/ atty to do redirect and focus questions that allow ur clarifications in ur answers. In my lowly lol opinion, If for example the adverse takes circumstantial indirect evidence and can show a common response from u to a similar question, now those memorialized answers may be valued as direct circumstantial evidence, it may appear as a pattern. Use answers the court can refer to as fact, on point, highest on point authority. Cool. Thats tricky. I like it. Aloha!
Sir I have Parkinson's with Dementia. I can honestly offer a different answer to the same question with absolutely no intention to offer an untrue answer, its my memory loss and Parkinson's makes me have hallucinations at times. Would I still be seen as untruthful? My integrity is the most important thing to me, I would be horrified to be called a liar in a closing statement. I may be going to a deposition, will my medical issue be considered?
In the situation as you described, it is understandable why your memory would be impaired. That’s a different scenario than the one I described in the video.
My wife's intestine was ruptured during a CS procedure in 2016 and it led to her death, albeit the baby survived. I have reported the matter to the doctors' licensing and regulatory body and they have been conducting investigations into the matter but we are still at the deposition final stages. In their affidavits, the doctors agreed that the intestine was truly ruptured and that the corrective surgery they performed was to correct this anomaly. However, they are harping on the fact that I didn't conduct an autopsy. Question: Since this is what the autopsy would have confirmed, is this in any way going to be a spoiler for my case?
Since I only practice in New York, I can only tells you what happens here: ruclips.net/video/TVu-qplh638/видео.html Best suggestion is to speak to your attorney and address your concerns with him. Good luck to you.
.....Instead of explaining, giving a rundown on you just joined viewers, of what you have been talking about, why don't you just tell them to watch this video when you upload it? It's very annoying in every 1 or 2 minutes you say, "Hi Jeff", then later, "Thanks for the thumbs up." Think about the viewers at the time of watching, how annoyed they will get when you do this.
I have a case in the 11 district for false imprisonment .I became a jail house lawyer whent from state court to district now appeals court .I have evidence of them misrepresenting court papers and providing false information to the district court in a habeas corpus greanted to me by the district court i have a enbanc case greanted by the appeals court for a hearing how long is my statute of limitations to file this to be hard .Or whare do i look it up in jail i had the Lexus program.But i doint have access to it know .I WOULD LIKE YOUR OPINION IF YOU DOINT MIND SIR.1983 LAWSUIT CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATION 4 AMENDMENTS VIOLATION BY A GOVERNMENT BODY.
I have a theory that he didn't originally have any viewers arriving late to his lecture, he just made up some names and interjected them at random. just kidding, good video. very informative and interesting.
Hi Fred, that's funny! Would be even funnier if I did what you said. It was a real Facebook live video and yes, these people just hop on and hop off when they want and it's important to acknowledge them when they stop by. Thanks for the compliment.
She is the plaintiff. Can she regognise these weaknesses, or inconsistencies, and address them before the defense gets a chance? She stands forst, correct? Thank you
Your video has me wondering about, what I will call a "sub topic", deposition and trial questioning. "Boiler plate" questions, how often are they used and where do they come from?
Note that the opposing counsel will try to rehabilitate the witness. If the witness lied under oath, and can be proven, rehabilitation is impossible. Why they committed perjury is irrelevant and will annoy the jury even more.
Yes, thank you. Get what you need from the witness to discredit them in closing, you’re not there to argue with them. 😂 I saw opposing counsel badgering my witness and the judge did not look happy. I didn’t object, because it was making opposing counsel look bad.
Very good, very good. Is it true that the plaintiff can only present evidence pertaining to the charges. Let's say the defendant was accused of spatting on the plaintiff and they try to use recordings and video footage of previous dates that didn't happen on the incident date to support there accusations. Would that be considered unmissable in court?
I can only tell you what happens in a civil lawsuit in New York since that's the only type of case I have experience with. You'd need to speak to a criminal defense attorney near you to answer your legal question.
Your Welcome! I have a question...how do I prove a document is FORGED?...AND has been need to follow CAsubmitted to court as the basis of a civil suite? I am a defendant in a civil R.E. issue in CA.I perfected a promissory note,and took bavk my land. This guy I'm dealing with is a dangerous felon.And unfortunately lives right next to me. I know i need to follow CA state court rules, and Im trying to do this thing all by myself.It is a bit complicated, but he ha shired an att'y Im all alone on ythis and Im telling you I'm sitting on a forged doc.I'm pretty sure his att'y knows it's forged as well
Kim Nord I don’t know the law in California since I only practice law in New York and only handle medical malpractice and accident cases. you need to speak to a California attorney about that precise issue. Good luck to you.
I'm a paralegal, and if it was my case I might start w an informal request to adverse to produce that document or even go to the issuer and obtain a clean vouched for copy u can do research off of. Wow. Thats interesting and I'm sorry u r having to deal w this alone. Ck legal Aid see if they have funding for ur type of case and ask advise. I think ur gonna DO IT and u will feel empowered. Im cheering for u! Watch out for any filing of a new case by him and against u. He may be posturing to file a lis pendens and cloud ur title, stop u from proceeding w ur court action til u straighten it out. Its doable but really takes a ride or die attitude. Lol. Paper wars.
@@NYMedicalMalpractice yes, you know the why but the jury knows nothing of the sort. For example if Im trying to show the elements of theft, and a prosecutor asks on cross "did you put your hand in the cookie jar" the response is yes, impeachment then becomes bad for Plaintiffs position. Failure to acknowlege the why dehumanizes the defendant, which is worse for the plaintiff because it comes off as overtly manipulative of the truth, as opposed to acknowleging proper prosecutorial discretion, now that were in the era where the courts openly invite lawsuits under the heading of "Mcdonalds made me fat". While we can get away with dehumanizing the government and corporations its not wise to ever dehumanize the opposing party when the party is a natural person. Of course it really depends upon the nature of the why, and what the most obvious answer might be, given the way the human mind works, even if we're trying to deliberately avoid it. Rather, it would seem best to acknowlege shortcommings as to own your case as opposed to having to guess whether the FBI vs. the CIA is the bigger liar which is how civil litigation comes across when the government isnt party. Rather if the jury thinks youre abusing the law its not going to go well.
@@Harlem55 Exactly. His whole presentation here is about how to discredit an honest person who has real and relevant critical evidence so that someone who needs to be held accountable can be let go to do more harm to more people. Only a bad person would be happy about explaining how to do something like that.
Be interesting to see a vid on witness consults. I don't know much about them, but appears these can be used to show jury the witness appears to have been coached, or shown how to tell the truth. Does not seem to be much on consults on youtube vids.
I understand your frustration, but that's the power of live video on Facebook. It's interactive. Viewers on Facebook appreciate that they're acknowledged and have just joined in. Plus, they can ask questions while we're live and I can answer those questions as well. When you repost that video here on RUclips, you miss out on that "Live" opportunity and yes, you're right, it doesn't make sense when you're watching the replay here. Stick with it and you'll find you'll still get tons of great information.
I have a question. Let's say the plaintiff John Smith has never been convicted and answered the truth on that. On another hand, another person with the same name, John Smith was convicted. How it's possible to clear this up?
So this is where Brady vs Maryland comes into play. I’m very confused can they use this to taint you testimony and make you less credible.i have a domestic violence case against my ex feels like I’m on trial instead of him.he has no history I do 7 yrs ago.he is guilty no self defense
Sister I hear u. My partner had a strangulation charge (in HI) which is a felony. Judge released him, citing that he had a right to secure his hud voucher amd hospital home. THE HOME INALSO LIVE IN AND WGICH LAW KEEPS ASKING WHEN IM LEAVING. On maui many years ago a victim of repeated established abuse went to the grocery store w my friend and her abuser came in stabbed her in the neck with an ICEPICK, then he stabbed my friend. He almost died she IS DEAD. telling women they HAVE to leave is disgustingly disparate treatment by gender and our disparate impact is women believe the system will LET UR ABUSER KILL U. He got 2 years of probation and he is prohibited from drinking alcohol. He drinks everyday despite. In 7 months they have NEVER NOT ONCE U.A.'D HIM TO CHECK FOR ALCOHOL AND SUBSTANCES. The law says they don't have to. Ridiculous I am a student of lua, hawaiian marshal arts. Its very easy to seriously disable a twit w minimal movement and strength. it has cultural aspects uay enjoy, and it also teaches u every injurable spot and layer (nerves muscle fasciae) of the human body. The women lua warriors were serious business It also includes a spirituality component. Its so awesome. #rulesofengagement #makeumSLEEP. 😡 im so sorry, I'm rt with u sis. PROTECT UR LIFE. Be ready to be seriously skilled. Its very emotionally and mentally draining to deal with this over and over. Men in america seem more unmotivated amd govt fed wreck money that buys drugs and ur next beating. I no longer rely on the courts or the police. and I told the prosecutor "don't u understand the studies & data? what r u guys NOT PROCESSING ABOUT THE FACT UR "SOLUTIONS" FOR THE WOMAN DO NOT WORK." I'm completely disgusted. As a native hawaiian, I come from a matrilineal culture. We r a supposed protected population and here we r seen as rubbish. Americans dont even address us as they call themselves by our mothertongue words as if i owe it to them to pretend they r great. We r not considered by cops, by anyone in the system. U have to scrap it out in court. And i do. Latest police discrimination ststs from a study of state of hawaii, Hawaiians r convicted of crimes 43% OF THE TIME. Asians first, then white people are THE LEAST discriminate against. Thats almost ONE OF TWO HAWAIIANS. WHISKEY TANGO FOXTROT? we r the 3rd most discriminated against group in getting effective response from cops. Look its imperative when u r treated disparately, disregarded completely at a time when u have been physically abused and suffered emotional violence now u gotta deal w boys w guns. Forget it. Women know we usually HAVE TO deal w MALE COPS Anyway who just repeat at broken record speed, calm down and are u going to let me speak. Nope I'm not. END THE PATRIARCHY. 😎im also a hugely experienced paralegal I love what I do, and I will take the bar next year and do my best to pass and to obtain a paraprofessional license. This is how I combat fear. I do excellence, I do strategy, I go into quiet demure respectful OFFENSE MODE. PROPER PLANNING PREVENTS POOR PERFORMANCE. Speak up and out sister! Aloha!
Helpful presentation, but the greetings and repetitions should have been edited out prior to public posting. These interruptions are slightly irritating and distracting from the topic. Also, the talk could have been made shorter, clearer, and more streamlined. A 30 min talk with continuous interruptions and distractions is difficult to follow.
Istiyaq Ahmed thank you for your kind words. However this was originally a Facebook live video. The whole purpose of that is to acknowledge and interact with my viewers who are watching it live. I then put it on RUclips so that others, like you, can get the benefit of this great information.
@@NYMedicalMalpractice It definitely is great information and I realised it was RUclips or FB live video but it is impossible to acknowledge so many viewers. Of course, the one's you acknowledge might get more excited but it certainly breaks link for other people who are already watching it or people like me who watched it later on.
He is the PROCTOR NOT YOU. Please stop being entitled. Dont watch if u dont like it. But ive gone w my boss to many a huge trial and I def going to apply falsis in uno in a case I'm the paralegal on now involving disparate treatment of Hawaiians by the HUD dept. And other assorted hud corruption. Go check it out! Its very usable and when people of color as I am mainstream this as a defense and as causation, causal connection, In legal arguments it will take foothold and it will become rote.
@@NYMedicalMalpractice Gerry im stoked to get SKILLZ HERE! I love being the evidence whisperer and I love to build boxes to put liars in when writing testimony q/a for my boss, cross reference w paper if possible. I like to be creative and my boss and I bet each other money. He always bets I dont get my evidence in. He always LOSES. lol. Mahalo and aloha brother for ur service contribution. .
23:20 I don't agree with the trick # 3. Maybe the person did not remember at the time of the pre trial testimony but recollected at the time of the trial.
I agree with the guy below, I like this guy, but he keeps interrupting the video..... Just give info and comment after, this is really good knowledge to stop and start and stop... :)
Hey Richard, I get it. This was originally a Facebook live video. That's why there's all that interaction and stopping to say Hi to people who just joined in. Wanted to give them the benefit of learning what they missed and have them catch up to the rest of the viewers. Watching this replay here on RUclips, I get that it can be distracting. Sorry about that. Hopefully, the content more than made up for the inconvenience.
exasperating with the unrelated sidebars and the hi how ya greeting and commentaries. Some good points > guess the best point made is how a lawyer wears down one's patience with frivolous added unnecessary dialogue.
The real issue here is not in how to discredit an honest witness or evidence, but in how does that person counter your less-than-honest and honorable attempt to discredit them. As someone who grew up in a house run by a high-level narcissist. I know exactly what game and strategy you are playing to. You are not an honest or good person looking for the truth. You are a proud ll liar that makes everyone see lawyers as liars.
@@NYMedicalMalpractice People that make life worse for good and honest people tend to. Do you honestly think that being happy to destroy the credibility of those trying to show the truth regarding what evil people are doing to others is a good thing that makes you and those like you look good to anyone? Think it through as if you were on the receiving end of getting cheated out of a fair and reasonable compensation owed you due to how someone has clearly wronged you?
Great video. A little annoying, you break off and say Hi to others. You lose the flow! But otherwise some great points. Thanks for sharing.
Hi Matt,
Yes, that's what happens on a Facebook live video. Thanks for your kind words.
Great video Mr O disregard the buffoons comment.
Millions of people will eventually watch this video on RUclips, there's no need to say hi to individual people, they are not watching this great video for the "hellos" anyway.
@Gerry Oginski No, that is what you choose to do during a FB live.
Very annoying
I gave up watching after the 5th recap.
MY FAVORAITE NY LAWYER !!! THANK YOU FOR YOUR VIDEOS, I ENJOY WATCHING THEM !!!!
You’re welcome.
ANOTHER AMAZING VIDEO Mr. Gerry - you da man. Honesty is the key people😊
Thank you Enrico.
It would be better if you'd just talk without commenting on thumbs up
Yeah, you're right. But on Facebook Live it's important to acknowledge the people who are watching as you're creating the video live.
@@NYMedicalMalpractice I like when you acknowledge viewers
It's kind of annoying when you keep interrupting your valuable presentation to acknowledge viewers or whatever.
I understand your frustration, but that's the power of live video on Facebook. It's interactive. Viewers on Facebook appreciate that they're acknowledged and have just joined in. Plus, they can ask questions while we're live and I can answer those questions as well. When you repost that video here on RUclips, you miss out on that "Live" opportunity and yes, you're right, it doesn't make sense when you're watching the replay here. Stick with it and you'll find you'll still get tons of great information.
Not at the price of disturbing/destroying your own speech, that is counterproductive; I really feel like thumbing down. Have too bad illness fatigue and insomnia to concentrate. Honestly, I have never seen the like of this, not even children would expect to be greeted when late. I even suspect it is just a hoax to give an illusion of many ppl joining.Which would be unnecessary too, since a good video is good independent on the number of views or likes. Have been looking for help/info f SO long, SO much and have little time and energy. Sad, because you seem nice with good content apart from that. Thanks.
Claudia's right. Look at it this way. YOU show up for a lecture ON TIME, and just as the lecturer gets to the point YOU came for, someone walks in, late. The lecturer suddenly stops, smiles and acts like he's just been dying for this latecomer to arrive. He starts over from the beginning! For example, right now, that's what happened to me. I hope "David" enjoyed the video. Me? I missed the whole point because I'm typing this. I'm out of here.
You really have to stop and interrupting yourself and repeating what you have already said every time a new person joins your session. Very distracting and it takes away from your very informative session.
yep... time to switch off.. the guy is an idiot
Constantly interrupting himself to say hello to people who are watching the video.
Hello Moises!
Because of 7 or 8 people joining in and getting a personal recap of the story, 11,000+ people get the recaps too. Challenging watch. Great content in between though.
Sorry about that. Have created another video about three minutes long focusing on just the topic which should be coming out later this month. Thanks for your kind words.
@@NYMedicalMalpractice was s@ssss
You are breaking my concentration and you have so much valid points. Just get to the points and stop interjecting saying Hi, how are you it breaks my thoughts
No worries...hey, how are you!
@@NYMedicalMalpracticelmao you legend
If the question about prior criminal convictions is asked by opposing counsel at trial though, wouldn't counsel raise an objection on ground of relevancy? If they are asked about it in a depo, relevancy objections are improper. Shouldn't relevancy objections only be raised at trial, if opposing counsel attempts to enter testimonial evidence into the record that is outside the scope of the case?
It’s a totally appropriate question. It relates to credibility. The reason you make the objection of deposition is that a trial, if the opposing lawyer wants to read sections of the deposition, the objection has already been made and will be made again at trial.
I couldn’t care less that you’re getting thumbs up and hearts
Two thumbs up!
nice but please stop distracting me and interrupting saying hi every time. its annoying. please.
Hey Adriana. You're right. Would you prefer instead I ignore those people who came to watch during their work hours or took time away from their family and not acknowledge them on a live video? I realize it interrupts the flow on this Facebook live video that you're now watching on replay here on RUclips and I'm sorry you don't get that edited, polished version of the content. I do want to thank you however for coming to watch and hope that the content was informative (besides the interruptions).
You should have created a separate video for RUclips. It’s a different platform. You wouldn’t act the same way in an informal meeting and in a court room. Your reaction to criticism is very defensive and rude! People are giving you feedback to help you in the future. They are not insulting you.
@@npesce01 lolol. Y'all too much
Good point but wrong tone when responding.
@@NYMedicalMalpracticewe would prefer for people to respect your and our time and show up on time so there can be fewer interruptions and distractions. The flow is great then gets thrown off with interruptions.
I kept getting lost when you stop to say thanks for the thumbs up..keep them coming hi to ur audience
Wait...what? Was that a bunny rabbit I just saw? Hold on a second, someone just said Hi to me. Let me thank them for taking some time out of their life to watch my educational video, the way you just did. Thank you. If you were on the live broadcast and joined in, I most certainly would have acknowledged you and thanked you for taking the time to participate.
Gerry Oginski I have to agree with the others about the interruptions. (Even with Facebook Live it really isn't necessary to acknowledge people who are watching the video. I've watched many, many FB live videos where there weren't these interruptions.) Instead of getting defensive, may I suggest a "thank you" to commentators and say you'll do things differently next time? I went through a whistleblower lawsuit (jury found in my favor and against the hospital on all 6 counts), and one thing my attorney told me when we were going to trial was to not get defensive--it turns off the jury. Wise advice! That said, your video was very helpful and confirmed what I strongly believe, and what helped me throughout my 3-year-long legal ordeal--just tell the truth.
I love to hear thank you so much 😊
You're welcome.
I understand many people were annoyed by the constant chattering with people signing on to his video. But that doesn't mean that the content of his video and spotted instructions wasn't very good material to know about.
Thank you Real Talk. I agree with you!
So how do you overcome those 3 points as the guy in the stand?
Sorry Peter, but I don’t understand your question.
@@NYMedicalMalpractice How does someone counter an obvious liar and crook, like yourself, that's trying to hide the truth from the jury by discrediting honest people that deserve to be heard and given compensation?
Or are you honestly not aware that you are the bad guy here?
I am not even studying to be a lawyer but the way he talks is so fascinating and interesting i really wanna be one now.
Thank you. That’s very kind of you.
Sorry this is the first of the videos that I watch of yours that I could not finish watching. 50% seamed to be saying hi to everyone and then starting over again and again. But like I said the rest were all good, I just don't the time.
No worries. It was a Facebook live video and I needed to acknowledge people who were watching live.
Thank you your video has given me hope. I am going through divorce and my ex is a habitual liar. I have been very straightforward, truthful and honest with my self and my attorney. Thank you sir.
You're welcome Charles. Good luck to you.
Thank you for this video, I need to save this for my own reminders. I now realized how difficult to be a witness, so stressful to be in this situation...
You’re welcome.
You're welcome.
Wonderful tips. I will apply these principles in my case study.
Awesome.
Great presentation Mr. Gerry Oginski 👍
Thank you Buddy!
Very useful information, thank you.
Ask Jewels You’re welcome.
Great Video. Would this include an expert report? The defense lawyer expert write's a report and during deposition doesnt say the same as his report. How do you handle that?
In New York, in State court medical malpractice cases, experts do not write written reports. Nor are they deposed prior to trial.
Very interesting thank u
Glad you liked it.
great videos!!! As a registered nurse of 18 years, new to the legal nursing field, your videos are both informative and entertaining. Thanks for posting!
You’re welcome. Glad you find them informative and entertaining.
great tips but please stop saying hi to everbody it is very offputting ...from Edinburgh,Scotland
As you might be able to tell, this was originally done on Facebook Live. It's appropriate to say hi to people who join your live broadcast to acknowledge them. I understand that watching the replay here on RUclips is awkward when I interrupt the content to stop and say hi. Sorry about that. Hope the information was helpful!
Gerry because your Mom couldn't spell Jerry. Its still annoying as hell!
My boy Gary...very good.
Who is Gary?
I can tell you love your job. I’ve never seen anyone get so passionate about law. It’s awesome to see actually.
Thanks Julie. I love helping people understand how these cases work. I think every lawyer has an obligation to explain, in easy to understand language, how their type of case works. This way a viewer who is searching for that information can learn and decide for themselves who to call to ask more questions. Don't you agree?
OH HEY, THANKS FOR THE THUMBS UP!
You’re welcome.
@@NYMedicalMalpractice LOL
u usually motivate me when I see u'r videos , am also a law student ...but soon enough I will be a full qualified lawyer ...good job bro
Thank you for your kind comments and good luck to you!
Gerry Oginski pa I
A year earlier. Tough to remember exactly what you said a year earlier. Your attorney would follow up and clear up any discrepancies.
Interesting.
A deposition is an inquisition
In a criminal case you have more protection
My lawyer couldn't stop her from bullying me for 3.5 hours
Noreen Rachuba Sorry to hear that. I can only tell you what happens in a civil case since those are the only types of cases I handle.
It was a CIVIL case , They couldn't have treated that way in a criminal case. She actually she the wicked witch of the Pa Esq how big was the dialysis room my husband died in.
I said as big as this room & half the other
No she says I want dimensions
( I am not a surveyor I said I didn't know) ten minutes late she'd ask the same question over & over .I told her my husband got diabetes when he was 13. She asked what doctor he saw
I said I was kid & grew up in chicago
There should be judges at depositions to act as referees
Hi, Gerry, great presentation. I know I'm jumping in here a tad late but even though a plaintiff did not disclose his past crime to his lawyer, does that absolve the lawyer from asking his client in the early stages of the retainer as to whether his client has a past criminal record?
It's a great question to ask during the very first consultation.
But the witness has a right to answer the question properly and explain why her answer has changed for example if I don’t remember certain facts at the deposition because I dint has chance to review my allegations from 4 years back then I can explain that I reviewed my complaint before trial date and now I can give a better answer or if I dint had chance to review documents that my attorney subpoena from the expert witness before the deposition but I reviewed before trial date then I can give a better answer because the documents will have all the facts of my case.
You could say that, but it still creates a credibility problem if you haven't reviewed the prior testimony. With deposition testimony, the witness is required to review it and make changes before signing it. This confirms that they have reviewed it before signing it.
A depo is offered for the value it holds, its a memorialization of legal witness testimony. it EQUALS the weight of ur testimony in court. It also carries same penalties for perjury etc. . I'd discuss w my boss/ atty to do redirect and focus questions that allow ur clarifications in ur answers. In my lowly lol opinion, If for example the adverse takes circumstantial indirect evidence and can show a common response from u to a similar question, now those memorialized answers may be valued as direct circumstantial evidence, it may appear as a pattern. Use answers the court can refer to as fact, on point, highest on point authority. Cool. Thats tricky. I like it. Aloha!
@@NYMedicalMalpractice ty! I that was my answer ty for lmk I'm on the rt track. Aloha!
Sir I have Parkinson's with Dementia. I can honestly offer a different answer to the same question with absolutely no intention to offer an untrue answer, its my memory loss and Parkinson's makes me have hallucinations at times.
Would I still be seen as untruthful? My integrity is the most important thing to me, I would be horrified to be called a liar in a closing statement.
I may be going to a deposition, will my medical issue be considered?
In the situation as you described, it is understandable why your memory would be impaired. That’s a different scenario than the one I described in the video.
@@NYMedicalMalpractice thank you, very much.
@@CBU-j2v You're welcome.
Hi Gerry. How does one dispute an allegation whilst conducting cross examination?
Sorry, I don't understand your question.
My wife's intestine was ruptured during a CS procedure in 2016 and it led to her death, albeit the baby survived. I have reported the matter to the doctors' licensing and regulatory body and they have been conducting investigations into the matter but we are still at the deposition final stages. In their affidavits, the doctors agreed that the intestine was truly ruptured and that the corrective surgery they performed was to correct this anomaly.
However, they are harping on the fact that I didn't conduct an autopsy.
Question: Since this is what the autopsy would have confirmed, is this in any way going to be a spoiler for my case?
Since I only practice in New York, I can only tells you what happens here: ruclips.net/video/TVu-qplh638/видео.html
Best suggestion is to speak to your attorney and address your concerns with him. Good luck to you.
.....Instead of explaining, giving a rundown on you just joined viewers, of what you have been talking about, why don't you just tell them to watch this video when you upload it? It's very annoying in every 1 or 2 minutes you say, "Hi Jeff", then later, "Thanks for the thumbs up." Think about the viewers at the time of watching, how annoyed they will get when you do this.
Maybe u should make ur own channel. But I'm betting u don't have a j.d. and u don't have a license.
the same thing happened to me, in family court. Yesterday I was violated.
Sorry to hear that.
The booklet of the pretrial deposition. When the person sign it can they keep a copy?
After returning the original back to the attorney, you can ask them for a copy.
Inst it true is a leading question... There can be a lot of objections and you'll have to rephrase.
Yes, that's true.
Very Annoying the interruptions hearts thumbs up. Please consider a redo with information only.
Notice the thumbs up I gave you along with the heart emoji. Sharing the good feelings and thanks for your comment.
I have a case in the 11 district for false imprisonment .I became a jail house lawyer whent from state court to district now appeals court .I have evidence of them misrepresenting court papers and providing false information to the district court in a habeas corpus greanted to me by the district court i have a enbanc case greanted by the appeals court for a hearing how long is my statute of limitations to file this to be hard .Or whare do i look it up in jail i had the Lexus program.But i doint have access to it know .I WOULD LIKE YOUR OPINION IF YOU DOINT MIND SIR.1983 LAWSUIT CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATION 4 AMENDMENTS VIOLATION BY A GOVERNMENT BODY.
Great presentation, thanks
You're welcome!
You're welcome Prathap.
Like Mr Mason did with the witness Dr G in the C.Anthony trial.... : )
Very interesting point.
Gonna go check it again I think I remember that moment ...
I have a theory that he didn't originally have any viewers arriving late to his lecture, he just made up some names and interjected them at random.
just kidding, good video. very informative and interesting.
Hi Fred, that's funny! Would be even funnier if I did what you said. It was a real Facebook live video and yes, these people just hop on and hop off when they want and it's important to acknowledge them when they stop by. Thanks for the compliment.
Gerry Oginski
I'm with you. Keep up the good work!
Thank you Fred.
Omg everyone ........ then pay a lawyer for his time and he will only acknowledge you
Very true.
Great comment! I dont get why they r trolling here.
She is the plaintiff. Can she regognise these weaknesses, or inconsistencies, and address them before the defense gets a chance? She stands forst, correct? Thank you
It’s possible, and yes.
Your video has me wondering about, what I will call a "sub topic", deposition and trial questioning. "Boiler plate" questions, how often are they used and where do they come from?
They are used by many defense attorneys who think they must ask a series of standard boiler plate questions about background, pedigree, injuries, etc.
You can answer by saying I don’t recall today I came here today to talk about this case I don’t want to get out of this subject
You could, but that won't permit you to avoid his questions which he is allowed to ask.
Note that the opposing counsel will try to rehabilitate the witness. If the witness lied under oath, and can be proven, rehabilitation is impossible. Why they committed perjury is irrelevant and will annoy the jury even more.
Good point.
WOW. This is so simple that is scary. LOL!!! You really realize how mindless people are when they are talking. SMH
Gosh talk about breaking the flow every 2 minutes DANG.
You said it.
Great video
Thank you Doug!
Thank you for the info! Great vibes.. I would love to contact u
You're welcome.
The thumbs up commentary is hysterical!
I agree!
Yes, thank you. Get what you need from the witness to discredit them in closing, you’re not there to argue with them. 😂 I saw opposing counsel badgering my witness and the judge did not look happy. I didn’t object, because it was making opposing counsel look bad.
Very good point.
How do you spell that Latin law name about lying?
Liar, liar pants on fire.
I mean it’s nice to acknowledge people but your screwing up the info on your video with to many interruptions. Would you do that in your courtroom
Totally different format.
Ty!
You’re welcome.
Use the "why didn't you" question to prove case
Not necessarily. That causes the witness to become very defensive.
Very good, very good. Is it true that the plaintiff can only present evidence pertaining to the charges. Let's say the defendant was accused of spatting on the plaintiff and they try to use recordings and video footage of previous dates that didn't happen on the incident date to support there accusations. Would that be considered unmissable in court?
I can only tell you what happens in a civil lawsuit in New York since that's the only type of case I have experience with. You'd need to speak to a criminal defense attorney near you to answer your legal question.
Your Welcome! I have a question...how do I prove a document is FORGED?...AND has been need to follow CAsubmitted to court as the basis of a civil suite? I am a defendant in a civil R.E. issue in CA.I perfected a promissory note,and took bavk my land. This guy I'm dealing with is a dangerous felon.And unfortunately lives right next to me. I know i need to follow CA state court rules, and Im trying to do this thing all by myself.It is a bit complicated, but he ha shired an att'y Im all alone on ythis and Im telling you I'm sitting on a forged doc.I'm pretty sure his att'y knows it's forged as well
Kim Nord I don’t know the law in California since I only practice law in New York and only handle medical malpractice and accident cases. you need to speak to a California attorney about that precise issue. Good luck to you.
Check out Steve vondran he got great info on this exact subject! Good luck!
I'm a paralegal, and if it was my case I might start w an informal request to adverse to produce that document or even go to the issuer and obtain a clean vouched for copy u can do research off of. Wow. Thats interesting and I'm sorry u r having to deal w this alone. Ck legal Aid see if they have funding for ur type of case and ask advise. I think ur gonna DO IT and u will feel empowered. Im cheering for u! Watch out for any filing of a new case by him and against u. He may be posturing to file a lis pendens and cloud ur title, stop u from proceeding w ur court action til u straighten it out. Its doable but really takes a ride or die attitude. Lol. Paper wars.
It is weak on cross examination to leave "why" unasked because it will be asked on redirect and you wont get another chance to do damage control.
By the time you get to trial, you’ll already know “Why” because you will have asked it during a pretrial deposition.
@@NYMedicalMalpractice yes, you know the why but the jury knows nothing of the sort. For example if Im trying to show the elements of theft, and a prosecutor asks on cross "did you put your hand in the cookie jar" the response is yes, impeachment then becomes bad for Plaintiffs position. Failure to acknowlege the why dehumanizes the defendant, which is worse for the plaintiff because it comes off as overtly manipulative of the truth, as opposed to acknowleging proper prosecutorial discretion, now that were in the era where the courts openly invite lawsuits under the heading of "Mcdonalds made me fat". While we can get away with dehumanizing the government and corporations its not wise to ever dehumanize the opposing party when the party is a natural person. Of course it really depends upon the nature of the why, and what the most obvious answer might be, given the way the human mind works, even if we're trying to deliberately avoid it. Rather, it would seem best to acknowlege shortcommings as to own your case as opposed to having to guess whether the FBI vs. the CIA is the bigger liar which is how civil litigation comes across when the government isnt party. Rather if the jury thinks youre abusing the law its not going to go well.
@@Harlem55 Exactly. His whole presentation here is about how to discredit an honest person who has real and relevant critical evidence so that someone who needs to be held accountable can be let go to do more harm to more people.
Only a bad person would be happy about explaining how to do something like that.
Wish I could talk to you for 10 minutes lol you're a smart guy an I desperately need advice.
Did your matter happen here in New York?
Sounds good
Thanks Mike.
Curtel the interruptions please. Nice mentoring anyways. Appriciated.
You’re welcome.
Be interesting to see a vid on witness consults. I don't know much about them, but appears these can be used to show jury the witness appears to have been coached, or shown how to tell the truth. Does not seem to be much on consults on youtube vids.
Sounds like you are referring to prepping the witness which is done by every witness and both sides in every case.
In other words, be TRUTHFUL.
Anyways sir, do you know of any instance where speaking the TRUTH has backfired.
That's correct M S.
No I don't.
@@robishere7339 Interesting. I can only tell you what happens in New York.
Be impeccable with ur word. Especially in front of the trier of fact.
Falses in uno , good good stuff!
Thank you Dan.
Get to the point!
I understand your frustration, but that's the power of live video on Facebook. It's interactive. Viewers on Facebook appreciate that they're acknowledged and have just joined in. Plus, they can ask questions while we're live and I can answer those questions as well. When you repost that video here on RUclips, you miss out on that "Live" opportunity and yes, you're right, it doesn't make sense when you're watching the replay here. Stick with it and you'll find you'll still get tons of great information.
There were many points.
Indeed there were.
I got a cop to perjure himself on the witness stand in the judge never did nothing to him just gave me a $600 fine
Interesting.
I have a question. Let's say the plaintiff John Smith has never been convicted and answered the truth on that. On another hand, another person with the same name, John Smith was convicted. How it's possible to clear this up?
Just need to clarify more details to make sure they are different people.
So this is where Brady vs Maryland comes into play. I’m very confused can they use this to taint you testimony and make you less credible.i have a domestic violence case against my ex feels like I’m on trial instead of him.he has no history I do 7 yrs ago.he is guilty no self defense
I don’t handle criminal cases. You need to reach out to a criminal defense attorney in your state to answer your question.
Sister I hear u. My partner had a strangulation charge (in HI) which is a felony. Judge released him, citing that he had a right to secure his hud voucher amd hospital home. THE HOME INALSO LIVE IN AND WGICH LAW KEEPS ASKING WHEN IM LEAVING. On maui many years ago a victim of repeated established abuse went to the grocery store w my friend and her abuser came in stabbed her in the neck with an ICEPICK, then he stabbed my friend. He almost died she IS DEAD. telling women they HAVE to leave is disgustingly disparate treatment by gender and our disparate impact is women believe the system will LET UR ABUSER KILL U. He got 2 years of probation and he is prohibited from drinking alcohol. He drinks everyday despite. In 7 months they have NEVER NOT ONCE U.A.'D HIM TO CHECK FOR ALCOHOL AND SUBSTANCES. The law says they don't have to. Ridiculous I am a student of lua, hawaiian marshal arts. Its very easy to seriously disable a twit w minimal movement and strength. it has cultural aspects uay enjoy, and it also teaches u every injurable spot and layer (nerves muscle fasciae) of the human body. The women lua warriors were serious business
It also includes a spirituality component. Its so awesome.
#rulesofengagement
#makeumSLEEP. 😡 im so sorry, I'm rt with u sis. PROTECT UR LIFE. Be ready to be seriously skilled. Its very emotionally and mentally draining to deal with this over and over. Men in america seem more unmotivated amd govt fed wreck money that buys drugs and ur next beating. I no longer rely on the courts or the police. and I told the prosecutor "don't u understand the studies & data? what r u guys NOT PROCESSING ABOUT THE FACT UR "SOLUTIONS" FOR THE WOMAN DO NOT WORK." I'm completely disgusted. As a native hawaiian, I come from a matrilineal culture. We r a supposed protected population and here we r seen as rubbish. Americans dont even address us as they call themselves by our mothertongue words as if i owe it to them to pretend they r great. We r not considered by cops, by anyone in the system. U have to scrap it out in court. And i do. Latest police discrimination ststs from a study of state of hawaii, Hawaiians r convicted of crimes 43% OF THE TIME. Asians first, then white people are THE LEAST discriminate against. Thats almost ONE OF TWO HAWAIIANS. WHISKEY TANGO FOXTROT? we r the 3rd most discriminated against group in getting effective response from cops. Look its imperative when u r treated disparately, disregarded completely at a time when u have been physically abused and suffered emotional violence now u gotta deal w boys w guns. Forget it. Women know we usually HAVE TO deal w MALE COPS Anyway who just repeat at broken record speed, calm down and are u going to let me speak. Nope I'm not. END THE PATRIARCHY. 😎im also a hugely experienced paralegal I love what I do, and I will take the bar next year and do my best to pass and to obtain a paraprofessional license. This is how I combat fear. I do excellence, I do strategy, I go into quiet demure respectful OFFENSE MODE. PROPER PLANNING PREVENTS POOR PERFORMANCE. Speak up and out sister! Aloha!
Helpful presentation, but the greetings and repetitions should have been edited out prior to public posting. These interruptions are slightly irritating and distracting from the topic. Also, the talk could have been made shorter, clearer, and more streamlined. A 30 min talk with continuous interruptions and distractions is difficult to follow.
You raise some valid points.
20:17 falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus. False in one thing, false in everything.
You are correct.
@@NYMedicalMalpractice Thank you sir! That's a great video!! Learnt so much. Best regards from Malaysia!!
Poisonous fruit=poisonous treeeeee!
Stop acknowledging your viewers and stick to your flow.
JGP 2019 As you know, this was a Facebook live video and it’s critically important to acknowledge people who join you on the live broadcast.
@@NYMedicalMalpractice cool, i love you videos but just save your hellos for the end. Your info is very helpful..
JGP 2019 Hello, and thank you for watching.
ANSWER THE QUESTION!!!
Exactly!
Please stop interrupting in between video. Your presentation is awesome and I really enjoy it, please don't spoil it.
Istiyaq Ahmed thank you for your kind words. However this was originally a Facebook live video. The whole purpose of that is to acknowledge and interact with my viewers who are watching it live. I then put it on RUclips so that others, like you, can get the benefit of this great information.
@@NYMedicalMalpractice It definitely is great information and I realised it was RUclips or FB live video but it is impossible to acknowledge so many viewers. Of course, the one's you acknowledge might get more excited but it certainly breaks link for other people who are already watching it or people like me who watched it later on.
He is the PROCTOR NOT YOU. Please stop being entitled. Dont watch if u dont like it. But ive gone w my boss to many a huge trial and I def going to apply falsis in uno in a case I'm the paralegal on now involving disparate treatment of Hawaiians by the HUD dept. And other assorted hud corruption. Go check it out! Its very usable and when people of color as I am mainstream this as a defense and as causation, causal connection, In legal arguments it will take foothold and it will become rote.
@@NYMedicalMalpractice Gerry im stoked to get SKILLZ HERE! I love being the evidence whisperer and I love to build boxes to put liars in when writing testimony q/a for my boss, cross reference w paper if possible. I like to be creative and my boss and I bet each other money. He always bets I dont get my evidence in. He always LOSES. lol. Mahalo and aloha brother for ur service contribution. .
23:20 I don't agree with the trick # 3. Maybe the person did not remember at the time of the pre trial testimony but recollected at the time of the trial.
Interesting.
Who is he talking to?
Good question. This was a Facebook live video.
On point #2, could Mrs. Jones just not answer the question about being convicted?
When you destroy someone’s credibility, does it ever turn into a perjury charge?
In civil cases, I have never seen that happen.
You’re videos are very helpful! I’m going through my own legal issues and your videos bring my anxiety down, thank you!
@@amberwalters8458 You're welcome.
If you can prove the witness actually lied under oath, not a mistake, but a knowing lie, it certainly can result in criminal perjury charges.
What if my accuser lied big & I can prove it ?
Then that will help during negotiations and also at trial.
I agree with the point below…great content but please not break the flow with “hi” and recaps.
Ok… Hi Jim, thanks for watching and leaving your thoughts 💭
I agree with the guy below, I like this guy, but he keeps interrupting the video..... Just give info and comment after, this is really good knowledge to stop and start and stop... :)
Thanks for your kind words and yes, that's the nature of the Facebook Live video.
Come florida....nightmare medical
Interesting.
The people in this comment section are absolutely awful... Also do people not understand how streams work?
Thank you Jacob for clearly understanding how live streaming works!
please the pointless interruptions it is annoying to good information
That's what happens in a Facebook live video.
I left you a message I am so happy to gave found you except I am in California. I hope you can assist me .
Hi Christina, I can’t since I only practice law in New York. You need to reach out to an attorney near you for assistance.
Tip: stop interrupting yourself in the middle acknowledging chat so much.
Interesting tip.
I wish you wouldn’t always recap when someone joins in. They can re-wind and watch the video from the beginning.
Thank you for sharing. Let me recap your comment. Someone just joining can always rewind and watch the video from the beginning.
Just speak and stop acknowledging everyone that come in.
Jackson Sorry, but this was a Facebook live presentation and it’s customary to acknowledge people who are joining us on the live presentation.
Ah this is a Facebook live video. It's important to acknowledge people who join you on the live broadcast. This is the replay.
Visit another show would u? U r interrupting my focus and Our opportunity to LEARN GRATIS. silly people.
Stop it u guys r boring the rest of us deep in dialogue about THE LAW ITS Y WE R HERE. U R IRRITATING. ITS NOT UR SHOW EITHER.
Mpho in South Africa
Please stop acknowledging viewers or friends. You lose track and constantly repeat the same things... :/
Hey Richard, I get it. This was originally a Facebook live video. That's why there's all that interaction and stopping to say Hi to people who just joined in. Wanted to give them the benefit of learning what they missed and have them catch up to the rest of the viewers. Watching this replay here on RUclips, I get that it can be distracting. Sorry about that. Hopefully, the content more than made up for the inconvenience.
exasperating with the unrelated sidebars and the hi how ya greeting and commentaries. Some good points > guess the best point made is how a lawyer wears down one's patience with frivolous added unnecessary dialogue.
Robert Wilson Hey, how are you? Hold on a second let me say hi to a few other viewers before I get back to my point. Thanks for watching.
I wish you could just focus on your presentation! You do this in court? Ever win a case?
I’d be happy to but...every time a dog walks by, “Here boy! Here boy!”
I love your information, but all of these shout outs are distracting me
Awesome.
The real issue here is not in how to discredit an honest witness or evidence, but in how does that person counter your less-than-honest and honorable attempt to discredit them.
As someone who grew up in a house run by a high-level narcissist. I know exactly what game and strategy you are playing to. You are not an honest or good person looking for the truth. You are a proud ll liar that makes everyone see lawyers as liars.
Sorry, but I totally disagree.
@@NYMedicalMalpractice People that make life worse for good and honest people tend to.
Do you honestly think that being happy to destroy the credibility of those trying to show the truth regarding what evil people are doing to others is a good thing that makes you and those like you look good to anyone?
Think it through as if you were on the receiving end of getting cheated out of a fair and reasonable compensation owed you due to how someone has clearly wronged you?
@@mrsqueakthecat.8061and that's where you get crickets lol great question. It clearly threatened his identity and income
Nice video but too many interruptions
I understand.