Carol Steiker on Furman v. Georgia (Part 2)

Watch part one here: • Carol Steiker on Furma...
In this installment of “Cases in Brief,” Harvard Law Professor Carol Steiker ’86, an expert on capital punishment and the U.S. Supreme Court, discusses Furman v. Georgia, a 1972 landmark Supreme Court decision that declared the death penalty unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment.
The ruling effectively nullified all existing death sentences and halted all executions for a four-year period.
This video, part two of two, looks at the process by which the Court made its ruling, a rare case in which all nine justices issued separate opinions, as well as the decision’s immediate and long-term impacts.
Though seemingly overturned, the Furman decision ushered in an era of heightened regulation. States went back to the drawing board to create new death penalty statutes that would hold up under constitutional scrutiny. In 1976, the Court decided in Gregg v. Georgia that the death penalty was constitutional if juries were given standards to guide them in their sentencing deliberations. The decision in Furman v. Georgia ultimately led many states to abolish the death penalty altogether.
Carol Steiker is the Henry J. Friendly Professor of Law at Harvard Law School. Her most recent books, written and edited in collaboration with her brother Jordan Steiker ’88, professor and co-director of the Capital Punishment Center at the University of Texas Austin School of Law, include “Comparative Capital Punishment,” and “Courting Death: The Supreme Court and Capital Punishment.”

[@sahebchoudhury]

Thank you for this video.

[@jplazawenc]

I believe the State must stand firm in executing death penalty to pursue justice and equity😁