Dear Prof Lazarus. I would be awesome to have that very lecture you refer to as a RUclips episode or series. It would be GREAT to experience the fruits of your excellent primary research.
But the faultiness IS interpreting the law strictly to the letter sometimes, because framers thought of a piece of law to be principles not strict rules in the common law tradition, not only talking about the Constitution, but also other statutes.
Awesome series, would love to see more.
I'm so appreciative for this platform.
Dear Prof Lazarus. I would be awesome to have that very lecture you refer to as a RUclips episode or series. It would be GREAT to experience the fruits of your excellent primary research.
Thank you Harvard Law School for posting this video.
It is just that no one can fault Justice Scalia for interpreting the law strictly to the letter.
But the faultiness IS interpreting the law strictly to the letter sometimes, because framers thought of a piece of law to be principles not strict rules in the common law tradition, not only talking about the Constitution, but also other statutes.
Do more of these, please.
Would love to see more, very helpful
How is this about Scalia?
Very good