Laowa Argus CF 25mm f/0.95 APO (APS-C) lens review

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 4 дек 2022
  • Voila - here is the widest angle f/0.95 APS-C camera lens available (I think) which automatically makes it of interest to people like me, even though it's manual focus only. Let's see what it can do.
    Support this channel on Patreon, for all kinds of exclusive bonus content! / christopherfrost
    All pictures taken by me on Sony a7R III and a5100 cameras.
    Equipment I use to make my videos (Amazon affiliate links):
    Canon EOS R5: geni.us/CanonEOSR5Body​
    Canon EF-RF Adaptor: geni.us/CanonEFtoRF​
    Sigma 50mm f/1.4 'Art': geni.us/Sigma50mm14Art​
    Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 IS STM: geni.us/CanonRF35mm18Macro​
    Marumi Fit and Slim CPL Filter: geni.us/MarumiFitSlim77​
    AudioTechnica AT2020USB+ Microphone: geni.us/AT2020USBPlusMic​
    Rode Smartlav+ Microphone: geni.us/RodeSmartLavalierPlus​
    Rode SC3 adapter: geni.us/RodeSC3MicAdaptor​
    Zoom H1n Recorder: geni.us/ZoomH1nMiniRecorder​
    DJI Mini 2 Drone: geni.us/DJIMini2FlyMore
    Music:
    'Opportunity Walks', Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
    Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0
    creativecommons.org/licenses/b...
  • ХоббиХобби

Комментарии • 59

  • @blaizze
    @blaizze Год назад +7

    I love the shot of the elderly couple taken from the cave at 8:03

  • @jwnrocks
    @jwnrocks Год назад

    Another concise and honest review. Thanks!

  • @Kunal0915
    @Kunal0915 Год назад +13

    Considering Christopher's love for the 35mm focal length, it came as a surprise that he hasn't yet tested the Sony Zeiss 24mm f1.8 APSC. I bought the Sigma 56 f1.4 after watching Christopher's review of it.

    • @christopherfrost
      @christopherfrost  Год назад +3

      You never know...perhaps my Patreon supporters will know differently about that one... ;-)

  • @jeo7347
    @jeo7347 Год назад +5

    Honestly it looks like a great lens, of course the corners are not the best however if you're about subject photography I think the advantages of f/0.95 completely outweigh the downside of the corners and the coma smearing. Also seems like the best option out of all the f/0.95 lenses out there (if you're on APS-C that is)

  • @mytube001
    @mytube001 Год назад +5

    Really nice lens that! Radial chromatic aberration is a complete non-issue in the digital age, as it is easily corrected in "post" if you're shooting raw, as you should be. The only other serious vice here is the poor corner sharpness at the widest apertures. I would love to have something like this lens as an evening/night street photography lens. If only it had electrical contacts for aperture data...

  • @Twobarpsi
    @Twobarpsi Год назад

    Great review!

  • @foreigndaruma9825
    @foreigndaruma9825 Год назад +3

    Speaking of exciting lenses in the 35mm equivalent range, any plans for the Voigtländer 23mm Nokton for Fuji X? All I've seen so far is a Google-translated review from Japan, guessing it's still hard to get a hold of for the rest of the world, but even with broken English it was still drool-worthy. Thinking it could be the one to really push people like me towards using manual focus more often(since I've already got the 50mm equivalent covered).

  • @trustnugget280
    @trustnugget280 Год назад +4

    To me the corners actually looked alright sharpness wise. Vignetting and Chromatic Aberration seems to be the real problem here if you want a clear image, contrast is also a bit lackluster but not a deal breaker.
    Coma smeering is unfortunate, otherwise this looks actually really promising

  • @sharpskilz
    @sharpskilz Год назад +3

    so thats a bit like 35mm F1.4 on full frame?

  • @panmaew
    @panmaew Год назад +1

    A very good lens if you use the central part of the image. The CA that's clearly visible at the corners down to the medium apertures makes it a poor choice for any kind of use that needs rendering of details in the whole frame. Also my guess is the true T-stop of this lens is far darker than the 0.95 f-stop marking because the light falloff at this max aperture is quite extreme.

  • @YouzTube99
    @YouzTube99 6 месяцев назад

    @Christopher Frost
    Are these tests/results applicable to the m4/3 version of this lens?

  • @poltem1
    @poltem1 Год назад +2

    love your reviews man, laowa really making some crazy lenses :D
    I also wondered if you are going to review the fuji 150-600mm and 100-400mm as they are the next to the 70-300mm the main picks for telephoto lenses for fujifilm users and I would love to see how the image quality compares between those 3!

    • @muttishelfer9122
      @muttishelfer9122 Год назад +1

      and Tamron 150-500 for Fuji ;)

    • @poltem1
      @poltem1 Год назад +1

      @@muttishelfer9122 to be fair he has reviewed that on Sony aps-c, so you can get a very good idea that the thing is mad sharp :P

    • @muttishelfer9122
      @muttishelfer9122 Год назад +1

      @@poltem1 yes, but it would be interesting to see if there is any difference between 24MP and 40MP on APS-C. The praised Sigma 18-35mm 1,8 had some trouble on the R7.

  • @DeepteshLovesTECH
    @DeepteshLovesTECH Год назад

    Widest - fastest APSC lens. Good one!

  • @Noreq
    @Noreq Год назад +3

    Any hope for review of Voigtlander X-Mount lens 23/35 Nokton :-) ? Especially 23 f1.2 seems not much reviewed on youtube and much controversial about its quality and sharpness. Wonder how it would perform on your test!

    • @professionalpotato4764
      @professionalpotato4764 Год назад

      The 23 f/1.2 seems to suffer from a lot of field curvature. I remember seeing some reddit posts where even at f/8 at infinity, you would get only the focused area sharp. Everywhere else would be soft. It also suffers from weak close-up image quality like the 23 f/2 Fujicron. The rendering is kinda nice though especially for portraits.

  • @trym2121
    @trym2121 Год назад +1

    I think you can use it for FF at 1:1 ratio

  • @sorwis
    @sorwis Год назад +1

    That’s actually good performance at f0.95. For video at low light this lens might work well. The focus throw is a little too short for video though.

  • @jcblum1507
    @jcblum1507 Год назад

    Nice!!!

  • @sfa01076
    @sfa01076 Год назад

    Hi can you review the 18mm version on m43 too? Thanks!!

  • @nimmira
    @nimmira Год назад

    is there a DSLR version of this lens?

  • @Badonicus
    @Badonicus Год назад

    I have the 9mm for the sony from these guys....great lens

  • @catcentrum
    @catcentrum Год назад +1

    0:53
    probably not f/16 since the lens isn't capable of that, nor is it on crop mode? Think that would be the uncropped FF coverage, right?

  • @AndreMonz
    @AndreMonz Год назад +6

    Does CF stands for Christopher Frost?

  • @franzjosefstakes
    @franzjosefstakes Год назад +2

    Whish they had a cine version with a very long focus throw. LOCA performance is more important for me in video than sharpness.

  • @yourtallness
    @yourtallness Год назад

    Is it different optically from the MFT version though?

    • @hopeless4ever
      @hopeless4ever 11 месяцев назад

      Yes, it is different. The element configuration has changed. This one seems a bit better optically, particularly in terms of contrast and ghosting; it has less spherical aberration.

  • @Snapit551
    @Snapit551 Год назад

    Peanus optics makes some nice optics

  • @JRS69520
    @JRS69520 Год назад +7

    02:49 I guess it is going to be a running gag to have every lens tested at f/16 even if they cannot close that far. Much like as every tube station in London is located as deep as a 15 floor building.

  • @XL1813
    @XL1813 Год назад +1

    Wait you say F/16 isn't an option but 2:48
    Editing error I guess?

    • @christopherfrost
      @christopherfrost  Год назад

      Yes, editing error (I'm so used to writing f/16 there :-)

  • @Zatore_
    @Zatore_ Год назад +5

    Lens only goes to F11, next scene: Focus pulling at F16 XD

    • @christopherfrost
      @christopherfrost  Год назад +7

      Ooops! I'm so used to writing 'f/16' in that bit when editing haha

  • @cottonbomb8272
    @cottonbomb8272 Год назад +1

    Problems now for Chinese manufacturer is the license for AF and coating science. There's still a long way to go but embracing the competition is always good for customers and the industry in general.

    • @nahlene1973
      @nahlene1973 7 месяцев назад

      I guess you hit the nail with licensing issue, that’s why Chinese brands are embracing LiDAR focusing manual lenses😂.

  • @stefanpanayotov4538
    @stefanpanayotov4538 Год назад +3

    if they make it with Electronics and AF this will be a no brainer for everyone ..

    • @e4_blitz785
      @e4_blitz785 Год назад +2

      auto focus at .95 is very difficult

  • @boyden1987
    @boyden1987 Год назад

    "Hi, it's me, Chinese company Venus Optics". nice.

  • @flikflak24
    @flikflak24 Год назад

    wish it was made for a full frame ( would hit my fav lenth and F stop perfectly )

    • @abel___
      @abel___ Год назад

      There's a 35mm 0.95 Laowa

    • @flikflak24
      @flikflak24 Год назад

      @@abel___ yeah but i love wide lenses ( the wider the better without fish eye pretty much in my case ) so a 25mm f/0.95 or even af 20mm F/0.95 ( or if we are real greaty a 20mm T/0.95 ) would be right up my game ( physical sice isnt that big a deal for my btw so i dont mind if its big )

  • @FlosBlog
    @FlosBlog Год назад

    THe nagain I cant think of a situation in which I would need corner sharpness at f0.95

  • @tomdchi12
    @tomdchi12 Год назад

    Chris, are you telling us that you're the problem, it's you? (Referencing a recent Taylor Swift song?)

  • @gillesmatheronpro
    @gillesmatheronpro Месяц назад

    What is "The rational Bible"... some sort of longitudinal aberration ? 🤔

  • @rensaudade
    @rensaudade Год назад

    Argus sound like a gamer name an edgy highschooler would use

  • @samk2407
    @samk2407 Год назад +1

    I expected better honestly, you can't call a lens an apochromat have corners like that. Really a shame I was interested in it for astrophotography

  • @shang-hsienyang1284
    @shang-hsienyang1284 Год назад

    Who needs L or GM when you can get a CF lens!

  • @dicekolev5360
    @dicekolev5360 Год назад

    What is the need of f16 whwn 99.9% of the reviews shows defraction at f11 with these 3rd party lenses even more than the native ones 🤔

  • @EduardoPortasRuiz
    @EduardoPortasRuiz Год назад

    Could we please get a better balance of first party vs. third party lenses, Chris?
    Recently it seems the lesser brands have taken a considerable chunk out of your reviews. Thanks.

  • @dangir1783
    @dangir1783 Год назад

    it would be an excellent lens if it didn't have so much vignetting

    • @nahlene1973
      @nahlene1973 7 месяцев назад

      Of all the issues (vignetting, CA, distortion, softness, flare-resistance), I would say vignetting is the easiest one to fix in post for both video and photo.

  • @toddm6999
    @toddm6999 Год назад

    Gotta admit...I like Vignetting focuses the viewer...preferably though with an on/off switch..