The next Battlefield will be a trainwreck
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 7 сен 2024
- ...and why that's nothing new in terms of past trends. What I bring up in this video is an issue of trust, and how repeated broken launches can degrade said trust.
It's not all doom and gloom, just speculation, and I hope that when the next battlefield does come around, we get a fun game straight out of the gate this time around!
Video Sources:
Angry Joe Show: "Battlefield 4 Angry Rant!"
• Battlefield 4 Angry Rant!
Battle(non)sense: Battlefield V Netcode Issues Tested & Explained
• Battlefield V Netcode ...
John Culotta: Battlefield 4 vehicle c-4 stunt launch
• BF4 - Battlefield 4 ve...
Reddit:
/ made_a_meme
/ lowkey_want_my_money_b...
News articles:
Polygon:
www.polygon.co...
Gaming Bible:
www.gamingbibl...
Ars Technica:
arstechnica.co...
Playstation Universe:
www.psu.com/ne...
Alt/Char:
www.altchar.co...
Music (in order):
Battlefield 1 classic theme:
• OST Battlefield 1 - Ma...
Banjo Kazooie - Main Title Theme
• Main Title | Banjo-Kaz...
MrThesteban - Battlefield 2042 - Official Main Theme Shi--yflute Cover
• Video
Johan Skugge & Jukka Rintamäki - Battlefield 4 OST - Fishing in Baku
• Fishing In Baku
Lost Planet 3 OST - Lost Souls
• Lost Planet 3 OST [FULL]
good
Noooooo
I’ve NEVER experienced a bug in any battlefield game and I’ve been playing since BF3 😂
“No offense” The worst thing EA did to BF was upgrade graphics and physics to the point it was to demanding to incorporate true destruction again. Not that they added “Hero Classes” 😂 I can’t with yall man. If game developers give up it’s cause yt wont stop complalnlng and focusing on the negatlve like do battle passes make a game unplayable or not 😂. Look what yall did to 343 who Honestly only improved Halo. Look what yall did to Battlefield (the best large scale war simulator) not a thing wrong with it but lost 90% of its player count due to YT nonsense rants about “hero classes and game bugs” BF is one of the least buggy games I’ve ever experienced 😂 I can’t
Cry about it
They ruined the franchise by chocking on BF5. It was in an awesome state with a lot of hype on future front that were promised and instead they released 2042
Dont forget battlefront 2! They killed their 2 investments right when they were starting to pop off.
@@Gadtkaz EA was on a streak of cutting support for their games early. Same thing happened with Need for Speed Heat as well.
I will just stick to BF1 and be happy. Franchise peaked there imo.
In my opinion, BF1 was peak atmosphere. They totally nailed the WW1 vibe.
id say the battlefield franchise peaked with bf3 but bf1 is truely the last good battlefield, luv that game
Don't forget how that trailer united us together to hate cod back in 2017
@@mischi9203 Battlefield 1 is so much better than 3 it's not even funny, I'd go as far as to say the cancerous things we have in 3 are the reason we have Battlefield 5 and 2042
You call the gunplay in bf1 superb? Better than bf3?
Either you are insane or dumb as a rock. Or never played bf3.
Gunplay was straight up garbage in bf1..atmosphere is not the most important thing in a SHOOTER. Its the shooting part that matters more.
Battlefield as a franchise didnt need to be broken if the devs themselves actually cared about the lore. The final DLC for bf4 (which according to lore was in 2020) was teasing things such as titans and hover tanks from bf2142. Why none of that showed up in bf2042 (only 22 years later) is absolutely beyond me.......
Yeah that was such a wasted opportunity
Also abandoning factions in favour of a proxy war fought with climate refugees felt really off, instead they could have more factions than just Russia and America, like an EU faction as a call forward to 2142
@thesenate1844 Ya none of it made sense really. The devs even put in walker weapon charms as microtransactions rather than including the 2142 vehicle itself. It's kind of a slap in the face to anyone who's actually been paying attention.
The original devs all left
@@sgtbeercanytit’s part of the WEF/UN Agenda 2030 propaganda PsyOp
EA and DICE could save the franchise if they listen to the fans and continue Battlefield V’s lost updates. There was a whole D-Day and Eastern Front expansion that was dropped
I think they dropped the ball so hard on launch marketing and with firestorm, they decided to cut their losses on the post content drops.
I think in a universe where they had went all in on the main game mode (conquest) on launch instead of PUBG 2.0, and went on differently about the marketing, we could've had those things :(
fr im still waiting for the “best” WW2 game they promised
there was an italian forces update that was dropped too
Ending Battlefront 2s support and not adding in requested content in the game
The fans are always split but they know what works and also know micro transactions work too
Guys…. Rule No 1: never preorder games. The studios should just receive their money, when they deliver. Then they will learn. I still ask myself why so many still do it?
That is the very sensible thing to say but in reality there is just a subsect of people who see the trailer and will pre-order the deluxe edition immediately. They will play the game a couple times and be satisfied. That's who these game developers are banking on. It's the same person who buys call of duty at full price every year without fail
For the beta. And then they don’t cancel the preorder.
We need to move past this cycle of trash release into patches galore. Just because it's the norm doesn't mean it's ok. Battlefield 2042 was the final straw with a lot of players.
"Every battlefield has been terrible since bf3!!!" *Proceeds to show footage from only bf4 and bf5". Whether you hated it or liked it, bf1 was perfect.
We'll it was the best we've had, but not perfect exactly. We did have people like Crowbcat make glitch compilations, and lots of memes were spread back in the early days. Otherwise I should've clarified that BF1 was better, in that you are correct.
Apart from the clip of a German A7 tank flying into the air while firing its flamethrower? Perfect otherwise.
Yo bf1 was buggy as hell and the menus are absolutely awful. It’s my favorite battlefield along with bf3. Bf1 was peak battlefield, I think the concept and or gameplay was close to perfect. There were some terrible balance issues and there were definitely bugs and issues. It’s the best battlefield game to date. Not a perfect game though.
@@NoobinatiI never quite understood the entire glitch argument when bf3 was glitchy as hell as well and there are plenty of video compilations to show this. I think this is a circumstance of pure preference, do you like modern warfare or do you like older warfare? What kind of vibe and atmosphere do you want? Do you want it to be modern urban or wet trench warfare? These are both amazing games that have the same quality and are honestly perfect games. It’s just a matter of what you like in a shooter and what you don’t. Thats the beauty of it.
Bro’s got an F4D Skyray flying into a train. Pretty dope.
I found the pic originally as a part of a meme, and thought it was an AI generated image first. Turns out it's a real painting made by Walter Molino, a Italian artist and cartoonist.
+1 extra points for recognizing the plane.
@@Noobinati bro I thought it was an F-106 😭
@@hendersonfisher2743 HOW?!?!?
The last good bf was 1
4 was peak
3 getting shut down hurts too (xbox 360 and ps3)
BF3 is still up on 7th gen I think
@@ponraul1221Yes, but it will be finished at the end of the year
@@andrededecrafWe'll see about that
Nah BF1 peak
Bring. Back. Classes!!!!!!!!! I wanna be a normie Marine/Soldier again, screw operators
Many hands may make light work, but TOO many hands make everyone confused about who's doing what and what's going on
To the 5 people who actually will see this video, never ever fly the MV-38 Condor. Please.
You're not my dad
greate vid, but as an improvoment could you add subtitles in the future. your english is fine as it is, but every now and then theres a mispronounced word which is hard to understand
@@nicokojo2514 I've tried to erase some of my accent, but it hasn't really turned out that well yet, so I totally understand it might be hard on the ears. Problem is that my style of scripting is only half writing, half making stuff up on the spot, so I have no accurate script to directly paste onto youtube most times I've uploaded.
Hating before the games even announced i see
Eh i dont really mind your accent and i find it quite easy to understand what you say 👍
Hype it up, shit on the fans, release the pile, piss on it, they make it stable, people finally enjoy it, don’t add anything else
Modern day triple A games
>Cilck on a video being quite sceptic
> Hears a mighty accent
> 100% sure agreeing
Kinda sounds like arch or artyom from metro 2033 redux
Battlefield isn’t beyond redemption, but they definitely need a consistent vision that still feels like Battlefield and enough time to cook since current dice is pretty much all new developers.
In the meantime, the Finals is a great game with a lot of ex Battlefield devs working on it and it shows in the quality
Honestly, I feel like battlefield devs don't play battlefield. Bfv felt like it was a little arcadeier than previous entries, and fumbled a few key points, but wasn't all that bad. Bf2042 felt like it was built by people who had no idea what battlefield is and ended up making an apex-esque open world game
@@antoniogasse4111it’d be simple to make BF 4 with V vehicle mechanic and that crouch sprinting and take some other aspects from 1 and you’d have a solid new battlefield.
@@yupyeah6991 i think map design would be the sticking point. Making good battlefield maps is hard, and with a completely fresh dev team I don't know if they can pull it off
@@antoniogasse4111 you’ve got a good point, unless the devs on map design are true BF fans and gamers it’d be hard for them to make a good map. Although I think a way for inexperienced devs to work around that is looking at older BF games and see how they played and gamers reacted to them and reach out to the community with poles and asking for feedback. I know that’s asking way too much but it really wouldn’t be that hard since most of us are pretty vocal and articulate about what we’re wanting and like about the game. Along with just looking at real world examples like Stalingrad, bakmut, Falluja, the airport from the US withdrawal from Afghanistan and tons of other places from conflicts around the world and get a look at the terrain and how battles played out for inspiration. Especially the first three since I know a lot of people would love a big urban map to play on yknow? I know it’s easier said than done when it comes to development but there’s multiple ways around figuring out what would work and wouldn’t work and I really think reaching out is their best option especially if they reach out through all the current games. Put a message update and all currently available BF games when players get online and ask them to pole, that way the only people giving feedback are genuine members of the community
I'd rather see EA sell the Battlefield IP to the ex Dice devs of the finals, they could probably make a good battlefield game.
Boycotting each and every single Battlefield game until we finally get Bad Company 3
4:57 state of AAA in general, this is what happens when the only thing matters is the line going up up and up
They robbed me with their "play a week early!!" and their stupid hype trailer. $100 wasted. Friggin' wasteland, running simulator and getting sniped trying to get to the objective. Crap hit detection that it was so bad that I would tell my teammates "run to the objective even if there's no cover, they can't even hit you anyway, just ruuunnn!!"
BF 1 was the last, true BF game. Yeah it had bugs and so did BF3 and BF4, but they kept their identity. 2042 didn't even have a friggin' scoreboard!! My God. Legacy feature???
I didn't play BFV because I was told by EA not to buy it if I didn't like it.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHA
$100
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA
Nah you robbed yourself by pre ordering. 🤦🏾♂️
Well I guess it’s an expensive lesson
I just hope that you learned from it
Ya dude what did you expect tbh,(still sucks, do not mistake me) pre-order never works out, and I could never do it, a week early isn't worth it, and I'm never caving to mtx.
Makes more sense to wait and see if it's worth.
For me the greatest fuck up in 2042 are, they removing the 4 classes we had and add the Specialists, no campaign mode, and honestly a feeling of Dice and EA being out of touch
I would say that they go back to Bf V and add all of the missing stuff that's missing like, Normandy, Battle of the Bulge, the eastern front and even new countries like Italy and France (Also change the fucking German flag, why the fuck did they put the Imperial German flag from BF1??)
The other german Flag could get the game banned from certain countries.
It might also be considered "offensive".
But I get your point
@@RipVanWhinkle, they can always use the family frinendly one with the Iron Cross instead of a swastika
@@YeEpIkAiYeI true true true, very good point.
I have no idea, they probably cheaped out and just reused assets instead of putting in the effort. Or a lack of time, tho I can't see how a flag could take so long. So definitely a lack of effort
@@RipVanWhinkle, is literally copying and pasting from internet
The same one that War Thunder uses for Germany
Fully agree that it'll be a goddam mess. I knew things were going horribly for BFV when I heard about firestorm. You can't lead in an industry by following popular trends. It's such a shame with how much fun BF1 was.
2042 will never recover from that awful launch. Dice threw in the towel very early on after its release. Expect the same from the next game in the series
I will never forgive EA for shutting down Battlefield 2142's master server, the actively bar the few diehard fans of that game from ever playing it through legitimate means. that game was goated and BF4's "titan" mode was a weak watered down derivative from the cool gametype that it was in BF2142.
Well next time around Dice will NOT get the hundreds of millions in preordered payments to fix the day one bugs, they will NOT get the hundreds of thousands of day one sales, as everyone that knows Dice will wait and see before they buying the game.
Dice need to appeal to gamers with a battlefield experience we can relate to and rooted in some historical fact, based in the future or even present times just does not work as it’s not mass appealing enough. The game needs to work as intended out of the box. Lastly if Dice want it to look like and play like Fortnight make a Fortnight game but don’t turn the battlefield series into an arcade game.
Bf4 was Peak(after it was fixed). Bf1 was the peak of peak
A point that is often forgotten and left out of many videos is that 2042s release was so utterly dog shit bad that even the groups making the aimbots and wallhacks for games noped out and didnt want to carry on developing hacks for 2042.
It doesn't help that when we actually got a relatively polished game, BF1, a bunch of people whinged because it wasn't BF3/4. Why would EA and Dice ever focus on quality, if people don't actually care for it?
Imo:
3, 4 and 1 were PEAK.
Everything was downhill after that.
Coincidentally that exactly after when many of the devs left
@@sniper0073088 Yeah I heard that's what happend, no suprise that everything after 1 was worse.
I found it impossible to not click on that thumbnail 😂
You have an eye for good thumbnail design judging by the look of your channel, thanks for the compliment boss!
1:55 to be completely fair that bf1 bug got fixed during the first week. And pretty much after that first week it was smooth sailing.
2143 is all we need. With titan mode intact on launch.
I’ll forever be mindblown on how a company could fumble such a simple franchise. We’re not like cod or anyone else. Yet they made the last few games as if we were. No one wants battle passes, battle royal, specialist characters like some sort of R6 and later on WZ rip offs. We play Bf because of the bigger battles, game types and variety in game play with each squad class from medic to scout and all their individual roles that added together can really make or break a match in some cases and all the types of vehicles. It’s a hella simple formula that only needs minor improvements if that to make people happy and yet they wanna throw it all out the window to “attract” a wider audience which literally always ends up pushing everyone who cared away and never retains the new players long term anyways it’s so stupid
Man the BF4-1 and maybe even 5s bugs were funny broken, sure it was initially annoying but then became part of the charm
Launching LAV in Siege of Shanghai onto top of C point was the real man strat
Dice roll is real and true
Yeah, the only bad part about bf4 was the initial hard crashing and server issues. After that it was smooth sailing.
I never quite understood the entire glitch argument with bf1 when bf3 was glitchy as hell as well and there are plenty of video compilations to show this. I think this is a circumstance of pure preference, do you like modern warfare or do you like older warfare? What kind of vibe and atmosphere do you want? Do you want it to be modern urban or wet trench warfare? These are both amazing games that have the same quality and are honestly perfect games. It’s just a matter of what you like in a shooter and what you don’t. Thats the beauty of it.
Really hit the nail on the head with the cycle. But sadly even with 2042 showing how out of touch the franchise is with its own identity, the average consumer will still get hyped and buy the next one. As you said “flashy CGI trailer” is all a consumer needs to see and they’re sold. Sad but I agree that battlefield will continue to fall, and this next one may finally be the one that lays the IP to rest. Just the state of gaming we are in unfortunately.
each fckn battlefield in shit now, but only for new players who havent played battlefield since 2002
and then Battlebit remastered came out and was superior in every way except audio and graphics.
they could get so much money by doing the bare minimum update for odler battlefield games, just imagine how the community would go crazy over 4 new bf4 maps or something
BF2 also was a trainwreck. It was so buggy and every patch introduced more bugs than it fixed. At one point they "fixed" the game and suddenly you could have more than one commanders per team.
it was foolish to think that battlefield would not go the call of duty route
Personally, I don't mind if a game's broken on launch. What bugs me is that I'd like Battlefield to focus on what made it special to begin with: vehicles.
I'd love to see a more advanced vehicle simulation. Not fighter jets slower than my rusty old Saab, which can't carry missiles and countermeasures at the same time. I'm not a competitive player, bugs can be amusing in and of themselves.
Make players who want to use vehicles spawn as a crew class, who can only be equipped with pistols and PDW's. Make planes supersonic, with objectives to complete outside the main battlefield. Allow me to customize if I want my fighter jet to be an F-18, a Mirage or a Gripen.
The devs are probably doing the best they can while the publishers and the ceo's set unsustainable deadlines and goals. Companies like CA for example completely ignore the advice from their devs and as a result, several of their games didn't do as well as they could have and now CA is being downsized by SEGA massively.
I think this is the case for DICE. It's not going to get better, the company will go into the drain like CA did and take the battlefield games with it.
The next bf game has not been announced and has hardly been mentioned whatsoever and the hype train already stopped
As a long time BF player. 1943,BFBC2,BF3,BF4,BF1,BFV,BF2042 ranked top 1% for SPM in BF1 and BFV. Top 5% for KDR. The only BF game that missed its mark was BF2042. BFV only lacked content its gameplay and gunplay was amazing. I encountered very few bugs game never crashed on me once. BF1 was near perfection that’s all that needs to be said. BF4 had trouble starting but about 6 months in it was great. BF3 also started rough. The MAV bug, going outside maps with the G3A3 lmao. Fun bugs but also bad. BFBC2 was just great loved the campaign and played it far more than MP. 2042 is a great FPS game…. Not a BF game and they killed off the best character ever.. good FPS bad BF game. Horrible flight mechanics. A lot of games have issues when people’s PCs and Windows OS is a cluster fuck and full of corruption. Literally over half of people issues are because their PC is just terrible. Not talking spec wise, talking how it’s set up software wise and the amount issues the OS and Registry has because people just not knowing what their doing. Also live service BF? Lol guaranteed failure if you’re putting lame skins with battle passes.
BF2042 would've been much better if they listened to the community on what they need to change
_"Back in my day they used to ban Snipers and grenade launchers too"_
One word capitalism
EA wanted capitalise more attempt to make 2042 better mw19 games they beat beat BFV
I remember, too.
"NO SHOTGUNS, NO ROCKETS, NO C4"
Literally 1984.
All I want is BF2 with modern graphics and features. No fancy futuristic shit and no extra paid content. Just good old conquest gameplay with teamwork and big maps. If they make it to feel like Project Reality, even better
Pausing at 5:16 to make a point and oh my god you NAILED it dude! Battlefield 3 still ranks within my top 5 favourite games of all time so of course I pre-ordered BF4, and was hugely disappointed. So I bought 5 when it came out without pre-ordering, and was disappointed. I literally just got 2042 a few weeks ago for my birthday and I've played maybe 5 hours, just long enough to unlock the SVD and relive the magic a little, but I think the trust is gone. I think I've checked out of the series for anything short of a BF3 remaster, and that really sucks. :/
battlefield 3 and battlefield 4 were always to be last peak battlefield games in the series
I still don't know why EA doesn't let DICE have unlimited creative choices. I mean if they continue working and inovating on the core BF formula and add new mechanics that work nice I think it might sell same as like BF1.
What really doesnt help is the fact that dice uses an overcomplicated, notoriously unreliable game engine that takes years of intensive traning to master making new developers seriously behind on skill. Like seriously, the frostbite engine is hot shit. They should have droped it for a market standard like unreal ages ago.
Idk how CDPR is doing it with TW5 but UE5 does not make any sense for big companies to use. It's extremely expensive for big projects while remaining cheap and accesible for small projects.
@@fns58 Your comment doesn't make any sense.
How is Unreal Engine 5 expensive for big projects but not expensive for small projects? It's either expensive or it's cheap. Even then, a good engine can't fix human incompetency
I genuinely don't think it matters.
Whether it's Frostbite, Unity, or Unreal Engine, DICE is going to struggle severely with their next Battlefield project due to incompetence
The next battlefield is already here and it's called delta force.
My soul shattered when you didn't mention 3 & 4 in The beginning. Just 1 & 5 as of late :( god I miss operation metro
Calling it the Dice Cycle instead of the Dice Roll is unforgivable. Also Battlefield 1 launched more or less fine, by modern game standards, if I recall correctly.
I mean despite its launch, I thought BF4 turned out to be maybe the best Battlefield game this side of Bad Company 2 once the issues were ironed out. It was so much fun, had so much content, and was supported for a really long time. Then Battlefield 1 was just incredible from the start of its life cycle to its finish. I really don’t even remember any major launch trouble that people were freaking out about. It was just fun, and it was refreshing. It’s really just once we get to V where, for me the issues became insurmountable - as a WW2 history nerd that values authenticity over all - I just could not get into the game as it was presented. I eventually bought it on sale to try the campaign but never even attempted to get into the multiplayer. And then they cut support for the game entirely before it’s life cycle was even up, and apparently just as it was starting to get better according to people who actually liked the game - all to focus on the train wreck that was 2042, which they eventually did *the same damn thing to* - that’s the issue with DICE now if you ask me. The problems with V and 2042 were hardbaked into the DNA of the gameplay and presentation itself and not simply bugs that patches could iron out, and beyond that, between V, 2042 and Star Wars Battlefront 2, EA and DICE have gotten into a sickening habit of pulling the plug on these games well before the end of their natural life span, a much worse practice than the shitty launches. After the last two games I really have no faith that this series is making a comeback. I think they’ll shove out one more flop, then EA is gonna Medal of Honor this series
Speaking of the 'increased amount of developers on the project' not necessarily being a positive: They don't have the talent.
There was a massive amount of people leaving before BF5 release and even before hand. It ain't the same people making these games, and the very few that are left are probably red taped by higher ups, a trend in nearly every single AAA studio.
i reallly like BF but some things that were used in other games arent used in newer games. For me the perfect BF would BF4 as a base game , big maps( and there MUST BE smoll maps infrantry only op locker op metro as such..), class based gameplay and looots of content( the DLCs from BF4 or BF1 ) , the thing I would implement would be the behemoths from BF1, since the time for my bf is as the same as bf4 i would use AC-130s as a behemoth. Also the points system in BF5 is realy great for me (were you could get the sturmmörser for points or atillery) and i personally like the the reviving from BF5 the most,---> they could make a smoll animation where the medic would crouch and actually hit the body with a Defib... lemme know what your perfect BF is :)
Aye, for me it will always be BF4, but it's mostly due to nostalgia I admit.
I've always been a medic main, and like you said BF5 had the best revives, full stop. Good cqb weapons to defend yourself with, tons of smokes and fast revives.
At the same time BF1 has the best tone aligned with it's WW1 setting, and doesn't go overboard with cosmetics. I had the most fun when everybody used to have like 3 gas grenades, and every objective was covered in gas making playing shotgun a really fun strat. It got patched early on because many didn't like it but for me it was hilarious.
Each battlefield has quirks that makes it a little bit different from the rest, and I kind of like that factor as well :)
The biggest downfall of 2042 was that it had no Metro/ locker in the map roster on launch, only in portal.
Levolution brand new my ass.
we had levolution in BF2 and there it wasnt just destroying stuff either, you could build destroyed things, something only repeated in BF5 more then a decade later
The fundamentals for Levolution existed, it's that they went all in on grander destruction events changing maps with bf4, and mostly due to console hardware evolving to the point they did not get bricked when a skyscraper goes down.
Nobody who worked on BF3 are left in the studio, the last ones left during the development of BF5. Everyone who worked ok BF2042 were relatively inexperienced and nobody understood why the battlefield formula used to be such a success. They also wanted to rack in people from other games by copying different tropes and gamemodes, for example the specialist system from games like Rainbow 6. What they did was combining these other tropes into the already established BF system and ended up with a product that didn't appeal to neither old fans of the franchise nor new players from other games.
If the next battlefield is a flop there probably won't be another battlefield in the future, as the formula is "not appealing to gamers", which is obviously not true if you just take a second to look at battlebit, which has a popularity that is boosted by the severe lack of a proper modern battlefield-like game.
I really don’t get why people were hyped with the Battlefield 2042 trailer. Did everyone collectively decide the fortnite level trailer was what Battlefield needed? Was it not clear from watching that the game had little direction and they tried to appease a different playerbase?
What irritates me about Battlefield 2042 is how unplanned and poorly thought out everything is done in the game, balancing and Map design is one of them
the Map design of Battlefield 2042, it literally looks like they put a bunch of random assets and threw them there for players to play, the Heaven map already shows this, all houses are possible to enter, Tanks can pass everywhere, everything there is destructible, it is not possible to predict where the enemy might come from, as there are 6 windows always open, which is where a shot could come from and balancing, I talk about both weapons and vehicles, WHY THE F*CK Can a BIRD be blown up/destroyed by shots from an SMG?? Because to kill infantry, you need to use half the machine gun before it heats up??? why the game has maps so open that it is almost impossible to hide from an RPG, an AA/guided missile, a jet, or a TV guided missile?? Anyone who plays helicopters on the Xbox One servers should know what I'm talking about, it's extremely annoying to play BF42 with a helicopter, we also have the fact that a TANK does not KILL an infantry after firing a missile less than 40m away from it, Why is the engineer class so weak? literally, you have to use the torch 3 times before it heats up or more to repair a BIRD helicopter or a tank, meaning that when If you get damaged, you need to abandon the vehicle, as there would never be time to fix it and there is also the complaint that appeared in the video, because a transport helicopter is heavier and slower than a helicopter full of weapons and missiles...well that's some of the frustration I had with this game and honestly, whoever came to talk about Skill, just ignore this comment, because it means you didn't understand what I meant
(and a map design that is good and shown in BF42 is from that map full of snow (I forgot the name), within the construction of flag D, it literally shows what Battlefield's Map design was supposed to be, 3 places to run or take shots and a place to avoid when taking cover)
There are only a small pool of maps where you can fly a heli for more than 5 seconds without getting locked on and shot down, but those are the minority, and with the amount of ace combat players out there chances are you'll not survive regardless even with cover because enemy air superiority.
Tv guided spam is still an issue even after nerf, in comparison to bf4 the only TV guided missiles there were on the big gunboats. You had to have some serious skill to hit SRAW shots against choppers.
In bf2042 to make a transport chopper work the stars have to align perfectly, and that rarely happens.
Everyone is literally screaming for a modern spin off of BF3 and has been for over a decade. Give us that fun, realism, and AUDIO. But that would be too easy.
I spoke with somone that work on the next Battlefield , he sayed that they go for a more modern approach .
What does that mean? They're incompetent
@@josedorsaith5261 idk , It was like 1 year ago , he told me they din't knew what tye big line was for the new battlefield , they just know they will go on a more modern approach.. BTW he told me that working with DICE is very cool .
I loved 4 and 3. 1 was fun but not quite my cup of tea but i could see how people liked it. But afterwards they just did not seem enticing at all.
I even have something nice to say to hardline. The gamemodes were interssting not all of them great but interesting and fun.
Here's my take, I don't think Battlefield will ever be on top like it was in the past. Back in the day, most people were console gamers and there were limited options for shooters. Battlefield was the closest thing we had to a cooperative tactical shooter with elements of team work and good immersion. The market has changed, many people have switched over to PC. There are so many types of shooters to play now going from the very hard core like Squad and Arma, or games that are more tactical but not as hardcore like Hell Let Loose, Insurgency etc. Battlefield can't compete with developers who have a passion for their game.
(Also on a side not, I think straying away from the boots on the ground infantry gameplay with vehicles to the extreme special forces with wing suits and shit didn't help the game out at all. Immersion was one of their best selling points, Battlefield 1 was not even slightly realistic but it felt immersive. You felt like a soldier on the field, not a special forces operator. Battlefield V threw that out the window, and Battlefield 2042 went down a horrible path of corporate greed.)
BF3 had some glaring issues that generally seemed like they were overlooked. The netcode for one I remember dying behind walls in 3 a lot but it wasn’t until the launch of 4 people recognized it.
Hahahhaha, I am midway through the vid and it is both hilarious (the Star Wars balance clip now) and accurate. Nice!
1.- Grab BF4
2.- Add new textures, weapons vehicles and maps.
3.- ???
4.- Profit
For those who never had the opportunity to experience the beautiful chaos of BF3 and BF4, you have missed out on an era and thus will never comprehend why us diehards are so pissed off with the current $h!t coming from that game studio.
I gave up on 2042 when I realized they had the coolest Battlefield themes in the Exodus trailer, the leaked trailer, and the Launch trailer but the official soundtrack sounded like whale sex. That shit made no sense other than obvious hype bait.
started thinking, while the skins are god awful, wasn't it terrible that the battlefield 5 initial trailer featured near exclusively premium cosmetics?
i have 1000 hours of AEK on locker.
I really hope the next game has the operations from BF1, it had potential to be the best gamemode in the series.
lol, the last battlefield was a trainwreck.
It all started going downhill when they brought the game to consoles.
People don’t realize these bad releases are on purpose. It’s a way of giving us “content” until the first content drops.
Bf4 to bfV good game with Release problems. Bf042 Bad battlefield with release problems until now
They are corporate. The corporate greed and rot has rotted the game. They need to focus on gamers and not investors.
This was a very good video... Deserves more views
But people never learn, the hype will be there again, pre orders will happen and the cycle will repeat again.
‘The DICE roll’
We were so close to greatness, and missed it xD
I'm still playing BF4, more fun than anything Dice has put out in 10 years
the ''shortest trip to the objective'' bit was hilarious. good vid bro. Dig the Conquerer pfp btw.
Minor complaint but I hate that everyone now refers to a game series as a "franchise" as if it's a fucking fast food restaurant or something.
bro, every battlefiled after 3? BF 1 is a masterpeice
Yes, nothing new, it's been this way for a while now. You'd be a fool to expect they'd ever put out anything good again
Next BF must return to its roots, similar in vein to BF3, and set it in a novel era for the BF Franchise: The Late Cold War. Call it "Battlefield '89"
I have not purchased a Batlefield game since BF4. I probably will never purchase one again.
Battlefield 4 was pretty decent tho
I had more fun playing Hardline than BF2042. Unfortunately, BF3 for me was peak and I wish I could go back and keep playing it.
Let’s get it straight - BF1 was fantastic and one of the best FPS games ever. Do I wish it was those maps and feeling were in a modern setting yeah - yeah I do.
I started playing BF so long ago that you could pirate the game and still play online.
How many people are going to pre order it though? You know for a fact 90% of players have the memories of a goldfish and they already forgot about 2042
Tbh replacing the class system with specialists wasnt bad, idk why people are so attached to the class system anyway when almost no one plays the classes the way they're suppose to be played. Getting ammo from a support players is almost impossible and its a miracle if medics revive you.. Where bf2042 failed in my opinion is the horrible performance at launch and almost non existent content. For me personally most maps feel shitty to play compared to other battlefield games. And the thing i hate the most about battlefield games in genereal is the fucking bullet spread, bf5 gunplay was the best thing dice ever done with battlefield, idk why they didnt keep it.
No, I want the next battlefield to fail now. I want it to be a failure that will ultimately break up dice as a studio.
This development team is a disgrace upon the name. The original team isn't even there anymore. They went to Embark or made some other studio.
BF3 and BF1 were perfect. Dice simply needs to publish Bf3 with better graphice
Don't play Battlefield. The devs nor the publisher know what the gamers want. Just play BattleBit Remastered.
Battlebit is for the real og's out there 100%
@@Noobinati I literally only played BFBC2 and Vietnam DLC on a friend's playstation and it was fun, but BattleBit has 127v127 and a functioning local voice chat which improves the game and makes it the best Battlefield type of game ever made. We already know the next coming Battlefield 2025 will NOT have local voice chat which is a key part of making the game great, so why bother?
@@sorenvc Yeah, I've actually seen people complain how in battlefield communication really isn't a thing at all. It's a valid concern, considering it's supposed to be a game around teamwork. Squad chat is rarely if ever used, and text chat isn't that great.
If they announce bad company 3, I’m gunna cry lol. Don’t ruin it at this point
I wouldn't want to jinx bad company 3 man 😭
@@Noobinati I just don’t want them to come out with it at this point. Let the franchise die on a high note with 2
Battlefield peaked with 2142 imo. Easily takes the #1 spot in the franchise for me.
That said, the Bad Company titles were rather fun too!
3:31 lmao I completely forgot about having Trevor Noah launch the game. What kind of shenanigans were going on to think anyone cared about this guy or that this was a good investment .