You´re wrong, Red Bull bought Minardi, and they haven´t enough time to addapt the car to new rules, so they used cosworth v10 engines from Minardi, and they have to limit them. Then they were in the same conditions than the other teams with new v8 engines. That was the history.
No, apart from the fact that they bought Minardi, you're wrong. They used the 2005 Red Bull car (also their Cosworth engine) for 2006. This car was originally developed by Jaguar before they got bought by Red Bull. Red Bull themselves moved to Ferrari engines in 2006. If you're gonna say someone's wrong, at least do a simple Wikipedia check!
What the... no... how do you guys manage to get it all so wrong... Let's put some clarity... The engine Cosworth supplied both in 1998 and 1999 was the VJ unit, taylor made for Stewart in 1998 and then passed to Minardi for 1999, rated at around 730-740 hp and was an underpowered engine as soon as it came out, in fact it saw no more application after '99. For Stewart in '99 the CR unit was introduced, which was better and had various iterations of development for the Jaguar team, reaching the 900 hp threshold. For 2005, Cosworth supplied Red Bull with the new TJ units, again with 900+ hp, which were the same car and engine in the video, just with performance reducing mods. But the starting engine was a solid 2005 engine with a healthy output of 900 hp, not a 1998 piece of junk with 740... in fact, V8s were able to produce around 750 hp, more than Cosworths old V10. And to top this all, I don't know where you got this 2001 Arrows thing because in that year they were powered by the pathetic Asiatech engines which were privately "developed" Peugeot units, not Cosworths. Arrows ran Cosworths in 2002 again and sold their chassis to Minardi in 2003, maybe that caused the confusion. But Minardi did nothing with those, as they sold them to Aguri Suzuki and became the basis for the 2006 Super Aguri car.
@@gavcom4060 I get it, it may get boring, probably it does if not hugely passionate about F1. Nobody forces you to read through all of it. And it's probably nice that under a comment with wrong remarks there's also some context. Two people liked it. Now, have a good day.
cosworth wasn't good at making v10 engines. probably up to par with the renault engine. and the v10 is much heavier than the compact v8 so not really. but it would have helped them in running contention.
@@Ben_Mayall AT the end of 2005, Honda had the best engine, closely followed by Renault. Because at the end of the season Renault brought out a further expansion stage to win the Constructors' World Championship. Otherwise they were on par with BMW, Ferrari and Toyota in 2005. At the end of 2004 they had a rather mediocre engine.
It most probably would’ve been had it not been limited however since it was a Cosworth V10 it probably would’ve had trouble keeping up with the likes of Mercedes and Renault
1 minute and 28 seconds of silence for the last V-10 in Formula 1.
We need an AC mod of this car.
No😊
Even rev-limited V10 engine sounds better than 2014/15 V6 turbos.
what do you mean "even"? the v10 sounds miles better than v8 let alone the v6s
@@VisionaryGTVS I actually like the V8s more
@@schkann1384 I actually like the v12 more
@@protalukoriginal4560 v12 ferrari= cum and no ears for the rest of life
I like all of them
Final v10 car to score point as well
And it still screams like hell
Yes they would.. V10s have 900+ hp, V8s have 750
You´re wrong, Red Bull bought Minardi, and they haven´t enough time to addapt the car to new rules, so they used cosworth v10 engines from Minardi, and they have to limit them. Then they were in the same conditions than the other teams with new v8 engines. That was the history.
No, apart from the fact that they bought Minardi, you're wrong.
They used the 2005 Red Bull car (also their Cosworth engine) for 2006. This car was originally developed by Jaguar before they got bought by Red Bull.
Red Bull themselves moved to Ferrari engines in 2006.
If you're gonna say someone's wrong, at least do a simple Wikipedia check!
The rev-limited V10 engine the Toro Rosso ran, is basically 1998/1999 F1 engines, or the ones Arrows use in 2001.
What the... no... how do you guys manage to get it all so wrong...
Let's put some clarity...
The engine Cosworth supplied both in 1998 and 1999 was the VJ unit, taylor made for Stewart in 1998 and then passed to Minardi for 1999, rated at around 730-740 hp and was an underpowered engine as soon as it came out, in fact it saw no more application after '99.
For Stewart in '99 the CR unit was introduced, which was better and had various iterations of development for the Jaguar team, reaching the 900 hp threshold.
For 2005, Cosworth supplied Red Bull with the new TJ units, again with 900+ hp, which were the same car and engine in the video, just with performance reducing mods. But the starting engine was a solid 2005 engine with a healthy output of 900 hp, not a 1998 piece of junk with 740... in fact, V8s were able to produce around 750 hp, more than Cosworths old V10.
And to top this all, I don't know where you got this 2001 Arrows thing because in that year they were powered by the pathetic Asiatech engines which were privately "developed" Peugeot units, not Cosworths.
Arrows ran Cosworths in 2002 again and sold their chassis to Minardi in 2003, maybe that caused the confusion. But Minardi did nothing with those, as they sold them to Aguri Suzuki and became the basis for the 2006 Super Aguri car.
@@RickZanardiyap town
@@gavcom4060 I get it, it may get boring, probably it does if not hugely passionate about F1. Nobody forces you to read through all of it.
And it's probably nice that under a comment with wrong remarks there's also some context. Two people liked it. Now, have a good day.
@@RickZanardiAlways fun seeing people not into history not reading history. Good write up.
Haha wow so basically if toro rossos's engines were to run up to 19'000 rpms they could have become constructors champions lol
Well.. yes😂😂
Imagine Scott Speed becoming champion
@@stepladder3257 that irony
REV-LIMITED V10 Cosworth
"Oh dear, Oh dear, Gorgeous."
**Gordon Ramsay hugging meme**
Can you tell me why they had a v10 engine in 2006 when the regulation was for v8?
@@israeljoao5532 when Red Bull bought minardi they weren’t able to prepare a V8 engine so they were allowed to use a rev-limited V10
I miss when F1 had 19000 + rpm engines 😈
The FIA closed that loophole in the next season
Bring back v10 & make them rev-limited at 5,000 rpm, I don't care !!!
Do You Mean 21000 RPM, and Started Like Turbo At 1927 RPM Right
But when Idle Like V8 In 2015 In 5000 RPM Right.
MrFormulaOneExpert3 How about V10 1,000 rpm? (Joke)
V10 Diesel with a 4,000 RPM redline?
@@flamingguy21 that's called wasting fuel you dumb fuck
V12 engine with 2400rpm limiter (basically a bus engine).
cosworth wasn't good at making v10 engines. probably up to par with the renault engine. and the v10 is much heavier than the compact v8 so not really. but it would have helped them in running contention.
We're Cool the V10’s were lighter than the V8’s. And Renault had the best all-round V10’s.
@@Ben_Mayall AT the end of 2005, Honda had the best engine, closely followed by Renault. Because at the end of the season Renault brought out a further expansion stage to win the Constructors' World Championship. Otherwise they were on par with BMW, Ferrari and Toyota in 2005. At the end of 2004 they had a rather mediocre engine.
TC for traction control?
yes. f1 used TC from 2001 to 2007.
@@dauf69 *From the 2001 Spanish Grand Prix to the end of the 2007 season.
The traction control also unfortunately hinders the V10s power and torque advantage, especially out of the corners...
No because power has no use when you can't put it down.
@@tygobermind3640 Throttle control doesn't yet exist in 2006, right? 😹
@@notSasori_sec You don't even understand what I'm saying, retard
Rev-limited. does this mean its powerful than the cars it was competing against?
It most probably would’ve been had it not been limited however since it was a Cosworth V10 it probably would’ve had trouble keeping up with the likes of Mercedes and Renault
It's Power restricted
Without limit it would have been 150hp more powerful than the V8 engines.
Power stays the same (around 900 HP,
What's different is max rpm rate, 16700 instead of 19000 +) 😢
@@fra93ilgrandedude rpm makes more power how can it stay the same
this car is v8. in 2005 v10 end
FIA allows Toro Rosso to use the v10 engines because of the funding, but these v10 engines are rev-limited