I just bought myself an FO32U2P. Since I had my last monitor (Samsung U28E850D) for 8 years, longevity was a point, and the DP 2.1 was the dealmaker over the MSI MPG 321URX, ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM, and Samsung Odessey G8 OLED G80SD.
Really appreciate this review. I have the monitor now and it beats anything I’ve ever owned. I purchased the LG dual mode since I figured it would be better for high-level esports titles but I have to say this is way better. You can condense the display to 24 or 27” while keeping beautiful resolution at 1440p. Great video.
the dsc have nothing to do with hdmi looking worse u might have wrong setting the dp.2.1 on the 7900xtx only run at 32gb/s with dsc aswell same as the hdmi 2.1 and dp.1.4 u need the redeon pro you get the full benefit of dp 2.1 without dsc
I’ll be honest I have the 4k 240z msi oled and you are right about getting easily addicted to gaming. Ive always been a gamer but damn something about looking at a beautiful image while gaming really makes you wanna stay playing longer.
Hey Brian ! When you get back to Australia you can grab the AW3225QF using the same panel (just slightly curved) for $1500AUD at JBHiFi at the moment. Hope this helps! I reckon that cheaper price will make your opinion more positive. Would love to hear your thoughts
The curve isn't an issue - just different. The Alienware is factory calibrated. I can testify first hand, it's another stunning 3rd gen qd oled display, well worth considering, and really a no brainer with the discount. Also natively supports Dolby vision, for what that's worth..
@@joshuaparr7434 Ther is no benefit with dp2.1 you cannot run multiple monitors with it as the cable has to be so short for the bandwidth. Better to get the alienware that can push more pixels.
@@Takashita_Sukakoki mean less color saturation have the Alienware qd oled 34 and the Asus 32 pg32ucdm is even turning magenta still look way better than any lcd to be fair
I regretted buying, post purchase support seems to be nonexistent. For example EDID issues has not been addressed as of today (RTX HDR still cap at 400 nits)
The best thing about new TOTL OLED monitors is the older models becoming more affordable. Recently picked up that Philips ultrawide for 750€ and I'm blown away by it.
The price man... I am on an older 43" Gigabyte QD OLED and while it would be nowhere near this in image quality, it was also expensive and downgrading in size for so much money is a tough sell for me. I wish Gigabyte would make more extra large monitors but they discontinued my model and never made any more this big which is a shame
Please please make a comparison for DSC on VS OFF In the future in depth. I knew it there was a quality loss with DSC on... Though hard to prove it. Maybe when 50 series come out and display port 2.0 full bandwidth comes out.
I want this monitor, it has great size, great resolution, great colors, infinit contrast, great response times, displayport 2.1 and glossy finish...but there's no GPU than can handle yet... maybe a 5090, but with delay it will be a better version of this panel by then, and probably cheaper.
Still awaiting the EDID fix from Gigabyte, for anyone wanting to buy this monitor, just know as of current firmware RTX HDR can only go as bright as 465 nits due to an oversight in the EDID data that reports to Windows, unfortunately RTX HDR needs this data to be correct to get the most out of your monitor.
I like how the neg he pointed out are the least of my worries, I have the backlight on mine on since i can't be bothered to set up a dedicated RGB strip. As for brightness, yeah its dim but it's this or 3,000 nits of pure radiance of a MiniLED which I don't really want tbqh.
I bought this monitor recently and my only gripe is the vrr flicker for the price I spent. To mitigate this I have enabled Gsync and Vsync with Ultra Low latency on Nvidia Control Panel and disable vsync in games.
Great review I wanted to share a crazy deal I got yesterday for some used parts. In total for 200 usd I got, a pc with 2x 1070s, i7 8700k, 32gb of ram, 1300w evga psu, and a asus mobo then another dell with a 9th gen i7 28gb of ram and the psu and mobo, then I got another 1070, a rx570, gtx 750ti, and 1660 super. Then also 6 monitors and he threw in some keyboards and mice as well as some bags of ram and cords. Thanks and I love your videos
Make no mistake, these 4k qd oled panels are a quantum leap over anything available before. Contrast, resolution and motion clarity are unreal. Right now its just a question of splitting hairs between the various models that use it - they are all excellent. The sooner this tech trickles down to mainstream prices the better.
I wish I wasn't so attracted to WOLED. This amount of data demands Displayport 2.1 DP80, but those probably won't be out until next year... Still, it's great to see all the innovation coming from display competitors.
One of the great things about TechYesCity is that Bryan tends to notice the subtle things which other reviewers tend to miss out. Like 7900XTX looking better than the 3080 or Intel latency.
I was very skeptical when it comes to OLED monitors for the longest time. The name of my main problem: burn-in. But with three years of warranty covering this and these 4K 240 Hz models, my resolve is definitely being tested. I possess a 7900 XTX with DP 2.1, too ... :D
@@freedomearthmoon1 I would not like that, obviously. It is better, however, than having artifacts appear six months after purchase and the manufacturer categorizing that as to be expected, don't you think? Also, I earn enough money to not feel a purchase like that every few years. So if the experience is worth it ... sure, why not. It is not something I am not giving a lot consideration to, though, otherwise I would have bought the AW3423DWF, when it came out :)
@@dynastes4938 Well sure, 3 years is better than 6 months. I suppose part of my assessment is the 240 Hz refresh rate. Your paying for FPS you won't hit.
@@freedomearthmoon1 Well, firstly there are advantages to high refresh rates even without matching them in fps, which is why I am not a fan of people mixing them together. How much blur you get on an OLED in motion is highly dependant the refresh rate of the panel, for example, as we are still talking about sample-and-hold displays, albeit very, very fast ones. A higher refresh rate is always better there because of that, no matter the capability of the computer used with it. Secondly, the display would likely be used with another faster GPU, too, even if it lasted only three years (which is unlikely in the end, since an OLED does not instantly become unusable when burn-in starts to appear anyway). Sure, AAA games will likely never run at 240 fps or more. But if that was the only point that mattered, most high refresh rate panels would not make sense to begin with. And thirdly, there are older games I'd like to experience on a monitor like that, too. And those will hit 240 fps no problem.
I have never understood this calibration of monitors, so basically manufacturers sell you a product that's not accurate to what it says it will do on the box?
The AMD RX 7900 only support Display port 2.1 at 54 Gbs (UHBR 13.5) but the max for full sized display ports plugs from a some independent testing is limited to UHBR 10 or HDMI2.1a with a proper cable. If you want to Test UHBR 20 then this can only be done on the mini display port with cheapest supporting GPU being the Radeon Pro WX 7800. While Nvidia Geforce 40's and Intel ark don't support higher then Display port 1.4 + DSC or fake 2.0
truthfully the Displayport & HDMI standard labeling and is confusing and manufacture clearly misrepresent their products and often forge to confirm if it type A or B revision of the standard all the time. to give a false boost to product stats
How great are these new panels. Once you use them it’s impossible to go back, it’s the biggest leap forwards I’ve experienced in the last week of ownership. From my own snooping around. 4k at 240 requires 52gb of data and hdmi 2.1 is 48gb so it’s not using much dsc at all. Do not use dp 1.4. It’s a waste on these screens. Mine is on hdmi 2.1 at 240 12bit. Dp 1.4 only goes to 10bit. Yeah they are expensive but man worth every cent
There’s two new monitors with this panel from Asus & Alienware both of which have Dolby vision & Nvidia G-Sync. It’s sad that they didn’t add those to this.
I'd like to use a monitor like this for color grading photos and videos for clients. The reflections of white light sources and even indirect light appear to be pink in your video. Does it look like that in real life, too or is it not that problematic?
Interesting you dont talk about/test the HDR at all...one of the main reasons to go OLED. I have the LG 32 inch 4k 240 and have HDR enabled 24/7. Its awesome.
Currently brightness is locked to 465 nits in RTX HDR due to incorrect EDID data, we await a firmware fix, just a heads up, apart from that it’s the real deal, see Tim’s review on monitors unboxed for more on the EDID issue.
But is it like the first QD-OLEDs with that ugly purple/dark grey screen instead of black unless it’s pitch dark? I got rid of my AW3423DWF after a few months because of that Samsung QD-OLED panel issue and switched to the LG C3 42, which is way better, but it’s just a bit too big for desktop use..
A tip for anyone here in europe. If you want a alienware aw3423dwf or equivalent. You can buy a Philips Evnia 34M2C6500/00. I just bought one and it is almost 100 euros cheaper than the next cheapest monitor with the aame panel.
It is not too often Bryan gives a really good thumbs up on a product in reviews. The monitor may have some quirks, but for sure he enjoyed this product. Put it back in the box Bro. Get some awesome family time before heading back to Aus. Stay away from that monitor, hahaa!
I've been "burnt" once and getting PTSD for being an early adopter to oled monitors at high prices. Spent ~2.4k aud equivalent on the 42 inch philips evnia, which started off being great based on the reviews and what i got out of the box, but philips bricked it few months later with a firmware update. They forced Auto dimming onto the panel and working with web browsers and microsoft office became an absolute nightmare for me to deal with. The whole panel will dim itself after 3-5 minutes of working on the panel even while im typing because the rest of the screen was "static". To restore brightness, you'll have to shake the application or alt tab back and forth from a different colored application. Even alt tabbing between chrome and microsoft word wont restore it sometimes because majority of the panel still stays white. All this just to reduce their likelihood of handling RMA within 3 years due to burn-in. This is still not rolledback or reversed despite many users being angry and complaining about it!
Weird that seems like a really stupid choice for them to make, I will see what I can find out from my end. Should definitely at the very least be able to roll it back...
@@techyescity just to be clear its the 42m2n8900; not the ultrawide (which you've covered before). not sure if they use the same firmware. im on firmware v1.13 on smartcontrol v6.23
I've still yet to see a OLED monitor that is better than OLED TVs. They all have pretty big compromises to brightness and HDR. 2025/2026 will hopefully be the year for Ultimate 4k 240hz OLED monitors with 1000+nit brightness at all times.
I was shocked by the bad clarity of OLED in general. IPS looks so much sharper for text und office use. Also the coating is so fragile you basically scratch it by looking at it.
@@ZackSNetwork Smartphones reach 280ppi density and above, and here it is much lover, if you've looked at 5K iMac on 27", or ... other ultra dense monitors (Dell 6K or Dell 8K) then those look even better, tricky part is - they are IPS and 60Hz - and look better only 'directly up front', move a bite side up/down and picture is crap.
@@ZackSNetwork Yes and they do look very sharp but still all of the current OLED monitors (I tested both W-OLED and QD-OLED) have a weird clarity. You don’t recognise it during gaming / watching a video but very much during browsing etc.
fr fr. The input lag at 60hz and 120hz is also the best you're gonna get on any 4k qd-oled 240hz display😅. Other 4k high refresh rate qd-oleds are 42 to 46 inch so that's just not as sharp, not as detailed as the 32 inch 4k qd-oleds.
A budget is just some decided amount of money reserved for something. 1300 is budget for someone. If you meant cheap, say cheap, don't misuse the word budget.
@@Andytlp Yeah fair point, OLED longevity is an issue. I just meant it would be 10 years before there were monitors on the market that justified an upgrade.
QD-OLED =/= OLED. QD-OLED is really just a fancy form of LCD. It's not bad, arguably better than OLED in some ways, but local dimming isn't the same as per pixel perfect contrast.
Mate for £1300 I would expect it to blow me and blow me away. Hell no. Thats an insane price tag for what? How about you compare the price performance to something realistic in the £300 range that us mere mortals can actualy afford. £1300 lololololol
gaming addiction is real and is an attribute rarely talked about during reviews of tech equipment, thanks for mentioning it
I spent more than 100 hours watching Tech YES City. No conflicts here. Just great watchin!
Same here 🎉
I smell amazing amounts of tech skill.
cool story bro
You post nonsense, you posted this yesterday..................my comment had no commentary. It was a joke!
@@freedomearthmoon1 Are you OK?
I just bought myself an FO32U2P. Since I had my last monitor (Samsung U28E850D) for 8 years, longevity was a point, and the DP 2.1 was the dealmaker over the MSI MPG 321URX, ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM, and Samsung Odessey G8 OLED G80SD.
Really appreciate this review. I have the monitor now and it beats anything I’ve ever owned. I purchased the LG dual mode since I figured it would be better for high-level esports titles but I have to say this is way better. You can condense the display to 24 or 27” while keeping beautiful resolution at 1440p. Great video.
the dsc have nothing to do with hdmi looking worse u might have wrong setting the dp.2.1 on the 7900xtx only run at 32gb/s with dsc aswell same as the hdmi 2.1 and dp.1.4 u need the redeon pro you get the full benefit of dp 2.1 without dsc
Great timing, I have the day off and was hoping for some Tech Yes City Uploads.
I’ll be honest I have the 4k 240z msi oled and you are right about getting easily addicted to gaming. Ive always been a gamer but damn something about looking at a beautiful image while gaming really makes you wanna stay playing longer.
Hey Brian ! When you get back to Australia you can grab the AW3225QF using the same panel (just slightly curved) for $1500AUD at JBHiFi at the moment. Hope this helps! I reckon that cheaper price will make your opinion more positive. Would love to hear your thoughts
The same panel but curved? also missing several functions and the factory calibration.
The curve isn't an issue - just different. The Alienware is factory calibrated.
I can testify first hand, it's another stunning 3rd gen qd oled display, well worth considering, and really a no brainer with the discount. Also natively supports Dolby vision, for what that's worth..
But alienware doest support dp2.1 so this is more future proof, apples for apples at the alienware price would be the samsung g8 oled
@@joshuaparr7434 Ther is no benefit with dp2.1 you cannot run multiple monitors with it as the cable has to be so short for the bandwidth. Better to get the alienware that can push more pixels.
The AW34DWF cooked my eyes and had a loud fan, im done with Dell xD
I hope next gen will *solve* burn in AND subpixel layout for text clarity on 1440p displays...
The polorizer would be nice any ambient light turns darks into magenta.
@@Takashita_Sukakoki mean less color saturation have the Alienware qd oled 34 and the Asus 32 pg32ucdm is even turning magenta still look way better than any lcd to be fair
I regretted buying, post purchase support seems to be nonexistent. For example EDID issues has not been addressed as of today (RTX HDR still cap at 400 nits)
fixed in the aug 20 patch release apparently
The best thing about new TOTL OLED monitors is the older models becoming more affordable. Recently picked up that Philips ultrawide for 750€ and I'm blown away by it.
I've been using this monitor since June now and I absolutely love it too. Can't wait to try it out on a GPU that supports Displayport 2.1.
The price man... I am on an older 43" Gigabyte QD OLED and while it would be nowhere near this in image quality, it was also expensive and downgrading in size for so much money is a tough sell for me. I wish Gigabyte would make more extra large monitors but they discontinued my model and never made any more this big which is a shame
Please please make a comparison for DSC on VS OFF In the future in depth. I knew it there was a quality loss with DSC on... Though hard to prove it. Maybe when 50 series come out and display port 2.0 full bandwidth comes out.
The Alienware aw3225qf is still the worlds best 4k monitor imo.. I have multiple of these monitors and enjoy the quality it offers.
I want this monitor, it has great size, great resolution, great colors, infinit contrast, great response times, displayport 2.1 and glossy finish...but there's no GPU than can handle yet... maybe a 5090, but with delay it will be a better version of this panel by then, and probably cheaper.
this panel is still great. you wont be missing out on anything
Still awaiting the EDID fix from Gigabyte, for anyone wanting to buy this monitor, just know as of current firmware RTX HDR can only go as bright as 465 nits due to an oversight in the EDID data that reports to Windows, unfortunately RTX HDR needs this data to be correct to get the most out of your monitor.
Was releases two days ago.
@@scytob nice!!!!!!!!!!
I like how the neg he pointed out are the least of my worries, I have the backlight on mine on since i can't be bothered to set up a dedicated RGB strip. As for brightness, yeah its dim but it's this or 3,000 nits of pure radiance of a MiniLED which I don't really want tbqh.
Thnx bro, enjoyed this review.
I bought this monitor recently and my only gripe is the vrr flicker for the price I spent. To mitigate this I have enabled Gsync and Vsync with Ultra Low latency on Nvidia Control Panel and disable vsync in games.
Great review I wanted to share a crazy deal I got yesterday for some used parts. In total for 200 usd I got, a pc with 2x 1070s, i7 8700k, 32gb of ram, 1300w evga psu, and a asus mobo then another dell with a 9th gen i7 28gb of ram and the psu and mobo, then I got another 1070, a rx570, gtx 750ti, and 1660 super. Then also 6 monitors and he threw in some keyboards and mice as well as some bags of ram and cords. Thanks and I love your videos
Make no mistake, these 4k qd oled panels are a quantum leap over anything available before. Contrast, resolution and motion clarity are unreal.
Right now its just a question of splitting hairs between the various models that use it - they are all excellent.
The sooner this tech trickles down to mainstream prices the better.
Yeah I should have shown a side by side against my IPS Matte 28" 4K, it was just night and day difference.
I wish I wasn't so attracted to WOLED. This amount of data demands Displayport 2.1 DP80, but those probably won't be out until next year... Still, it's great to see all the innovation coming from display competitors.
One of the great things about TechYesCity is that Bryan tends to notice the subtle things which other reviewers tend to miss out. Like 7900XTX looking better than the 3080 or Intel latency.
I was very skeptical when it comes to OLED monitors for the longest time. The name of my main problem: burn-in. But with three years of warranty covering this and these 4K 240 Hz models, my resolve is definitely being tested. I possess a 7900 XTX with DP 2.1, too ... :D
$1,000 and up for a monitor and a 3 year warranty against burn in seals the deal for you? So, when it's trash in 4 years your good to go?
@@freedomearthmoon1 I would not like that, obviously. It is better, however, than having artifacts appear six months after purchase and the manufacturer categorizing that as to be expected, don't you think?
Also, I earn enough money to not feel a purchase like that every few years. So if the experience is worth it ... sure, why not. It is not something I am not giving a lot consideration to, though, otherwise I would have bought the AW3423DWF, when it came out :)
@@dynastes4938 Well sure, 3 years is better than 6 months. I suppose part of my assessment is the 240 Hz refresh rate. Your paying for FPS you won't hit.
@@freedomearthmoon1 Well, firstly there are advantages to high refresh rates even without matching them in fps, which is why I am not a fan of people mixing them together. How much blur you get on an OLED in motion is highly dependant the refresh rate of the panel, for example, as we are still talking about sample-and-hold displays, albeit very, very fast ones. A higher refresh rate is always better there because of that, no matter the capability of the computer used with it.
Secondly, the display would likely be used with another faster GPU, too, even if it lasted only three years (which is unlikely in the end, since an OLED does not instantly become unusable when burn-in starts to appear anyway). Sure, AAA games will likely never run at 240 fps or more. But if that was the only point that mattered, most high refresh rate panels would not make sense to begin with.
And thirdly, there are older games I'd like to experience on a monitor like that, too. And those will hit 240 fps no problem.
Color calibration should be default from the factory. ✌
Gigabyte is quickly becoming the king of everything PC these days
Lmao
I have never understood this calibration of monitors, so basically manufacturers sell you a product that's not accurate to what it says it will do on the box?
If you work with any color related work, you can ask best buy to calibrate about $450 plus tax
The AMD RX 7900 only support Display port 2.1 at 54 Gbs (UHBR 13.5) but the max for full sized display ports plugs from a some independent testing is limited to UHBR 10 or HDMI2.1a with a proper cable. If you want to Test UHBR 20 then this can only be done on the mini display port with cheapest supporting GPU being the Radeon Pro WX 7800. While Nvidia Geforce 40's and Intel ark don't support higher then Display port 1.4 + DSC or fake 2.0
truthfully the Displayport & HDMI standard labeling and is confusing and manufacture clearly misrepresent their products and often forge to confirm if it type A or B revision of the standard all the time. to give a false boost to product stats
*NVIDIA
*Arc
*than
*DisplayPort
I don't want to be dragging in more video games but it looks like a hell of monitor indeed 🔥🚀
Great review ! Thanks
Looking forward to getting one of these in 5 years for hopefully half the price
How great are these new panels. Once you use them it’s impossible to go back, it’s the biggest leap forwards I’ve experienced in the last week of ownership. From my own snooping around. 4k at 240 requires 52gb of data and hdmi 2.1 is 48gb so it’s not using much dsc at all. Do not use dp 1.4. It’s a waste on these screens. Mine is on hdmi 2.1 at 240 12bit. Dp 1.4 only goes to 10bit. Yeah they are expensive but man worth every cent
burn in and dead pixels within 2 years
@@georgiospappas that’s why I went woled, my other woled screen is fine after 5 years
There’s two new monitors with this panel from Asus & Alienware both of which have Dolby vision & Nvidia G-Sync.
It’s sad that they didn’t add those to this.
I'd like to use a monitor like this for color grading photos and videos for clients. The reflections of white light sources and even indirect light appear to be pink in your video. Does it look like that in real life, too or is it not that problematic?
Interesting you dont talk about/test the HDR at all...one of the main reasons to go OLED. I have the LG 32 inch 4k 240 and have HDR enabled 24/7. Its awesome.
Monitor cost more than my whole system these monitor manufacturers need to get real.
I got the MSI 321UPX for $1700 AUD, DP 2.1 is great but these prices are crazy
Watch out when updating to the current firmware. My display got bricked and needs to be sent in for warranty because the screen is completely white,
what a dream. however, I won't be going smaller than TV sizes. TVs also better value considering the display size, 240hz yet to come though.
What about eye fatigue and using this monitor for productivity (text clarity, flicker free)? Thanks 🎉
Qd oled , almost want one but burn in is still a thing, even if it's not as bad, is still going to be an issue for me.
Oh this is Exciting, that's the one I am wanting to buy
Currently brightness is locked to 465 nits in RTX HDR due to incorrect EDID data, we await a firmware fix, just a heads up, apart from that it’s the real deal, see Tim’s review on monitors unboxed for more on the EDID issue.
But is it like the first QD-OLEDs with that ugly purple/dark grey screen instead of black unless it’s pitch dark?
I got rid of my AW3423DWF after a few months because of that Samsung QD-OLED panel issue and switched to the LG C3 42, which is way better, but it’s just a bit too big for desktop use..
I would love to have a 36" or 40" version of this so I could move further away or mount on the wall in front of my desk.
once you touch OLED, there is no going back 😂😂😂
Yeah after upgrading from ips i was blown away.
its unfortunate that manufactures don't calibrate these monitors from the factory. Paying $1000.00 for gaming monitors without a calibration is a sin
A tip for anyone here in europe. If you want a alienware aw3423dwf or equivalent. You can buy a Philips Evnia 34M2C6500/00. I just bought one and it is almost 100 euros cheaper than the next cheapest monitor with the aame panel.
10:13 Is Everything alright sir, your Left hand seems injured.
New Dream Monitor
And just like that. I subbed
It is not too often Bryan gives a really good thumbs up on a product in reviews. The monitor may have some quirks, but for sure he enjoyed this product. Put it back in the box Bro. Get some awesome family time before heading back to Aus. Stay away from that monitor, hahaa!
Still waiting for the fix for the ocd text pixels for oled, and durability, hopefully price will be more affordable soon
I've been "burnt" once and getting PTSD for being an early adopter to oled monitors at high prices. Spent ~2.4k aud equivalent on the 42 inch philips evnia, which started off being great based on the reviews and what i got out of the box, but philips bricked it few months later with a firmware update. They forced Auto dimming onto the panel and working with web browsers and microsoft office became an absolute nightmare for me to deal with. The whole panel will dim itself after 3-5 minutes of working on the panel even while im typing because the rest of the screen was "static". To restore brightness, you'll have to shake the application or alt tab back and forth from a different colored application. Even alt tabbing between chrome and microsoft word wont restore it sometimes because majority of the panel still stays white.
All this just to reduce their likelihood of handling RMA within 3 years due to burn-in.
This is still not rolledback or reversed despite many users being angry and complaining about it!
Weird that seems like a really stupid choice for them to make, I will see what I can find out from my end. Should definitely at the very least be able to roll it back...
@@techyescity just to be clear its the 42m2n8900; not the ultrawide (which you've covered before). not sure if they use the same firmware. im on firmware v1.13 on smartcontrol v6.23
10:51 How did you scratch your arm? 😮
Is there a slight hiss on the audio?
Monitors have quite dropped in price, 1440p 27inch now about 200 ish, used to be 700 or higher. Many more options now its great!
what will 1030 or 5600g do to this monitor? ^^
I'd be interested in the Alienware 32 OLED for comparison?
Alienware kills it.
@@JoeMama-yl1owThey're both litterly the exact same panel except that the Alienware is curved😂
What does Text look like on it? I heard OLEDs have problems with blurry text.
At 4K 32' it's dramatically less at noticeable as it was on those 1440p 27' panels last year (source, monitors unboxed opinion)
Mmm gonna wait till 4k 500hz comes out and matures. 🤔
Yeah and a GPU that’s even capable of running that…
Yeah what do you think you're going to use to drive that champ your RTX 9090?
Lost me at glossy and Aorus. Appreciate the review though!
@@Aliothale Why ? This monitor is very good among asus and msi my friend.
I need a new monitor but not something this full on
I've still yet to see a OLED monitor that is better than OLED TVs. They all have pretty big compromises to brightness and HDR. 2025/2026 will hopefully be the year for Ultimate 4k 240hz OLED monitors with 1000+nit brightness at all times.
I was shocked by the bad clarity of OLED in general. IPS looks so much sharper for text und office use. Also the coating is so fragile you basically scratch it by looking at it.
How is the clarity bad. Smartphones and tablets have OLED displays and they look incredible.
@@ZackSNetwork Smartphones reach 280ppi density and above, and here it is much lover, if you've looked at 5K iMac on 27", or ... other ultra dense monitors (Dell 6K or Dell 8K) then those look even better, tricky part is - they are IPS and 60Hz - and look better only 'directly up front', move a bite side up/down and picture is crap.
@@ZackSNetwork Yes and they do look very sharp but still all of the current OLED monitors (I tested both W-OLED and QD-OLED) have a weird clarity. You don’t recognise it during gaming / watching a video but very much during browsing etc.
@@interceptor001 are you looking at a 4k display with that impression?
@@-Jakob- Yes both 4k 32GQ950 and G80SD, FO32U2P, 32GS95UX
There no point getting a high tier graphics card without a high tier monitor. 😊
this is a latest and greatest
Pretty decent.
"once go true black never come back"
I Spent 100 Hours on the Aorus FO32U2P 240Hz 4K OLED Monitor - I am now conflickered
Love this monitor its monster for ps5 in my opinion.
fr fr. The input lag at 60hz and 120hz is also the best you're gonna get on any 4k qd-oled 240hz display😅. Other 4k high refresh rate qd-oleds are 42 to 46 inch so that's just not as sharp, not as detailed as the 32 inch 4k qd-oleds.
@@luukherfst1209 so true
Bryan should also creat a gaming channel you're losing so much opportunity and I'm still waiting for the friend request in steam lol
Dude, he's a one man operation that occasionally hires an editor. He's already busy AF.
The alienware does 12bpc @ 240hz
addicted?????? time to see the doctors
Just a BIG RGB AD on the back lol.
1300!!!!! What happened to budget builds???
A budget is just some decided amount of money reserved for something. 1300 is budget for someone.
If you meant cheap, say cheap, don't misuse the word budget.
Yeah it's not cheap but a 32 inch 4K 240hz OLED is a 10 year monitor.
Assuming oleds last that long. My guess youre gonna start seeing problems by 3-5 years tops?
@@Andytlp Yeah fair point, OLED longevity is an issue. I just meant it would be 10 years before there were monitors on the market that justified an upgrade.
Ah, you've gaming, no wonder you botched the Intel microcode video so badly.
Give me same but 24 incher. We are gamers don't need TV
It's 4k bro😂
I wish it had some more nits
But if u don't want the panel, I will not say no to it :)
QD-OLED =/= OLED. QD-OLED is really just a fancy form of LCD. It's not bad, arguably better than OLED in some ways, but local dimming isn't the same as per pixel perfect contrast.
…
lol way out of my price range
colorbrate lol
Muerta
this is only 240hz flat screen for 32inch
Mate for £1300 I would expect it to blow me and blow me away. Hell no. Thats an insane price tag for what? How about you compare the price performance to something realistic in the £300 range that us mere mortals can actualy afford. £1300 lololololol
get a job