Tamron 18-400 Lens - Field Test and Review (great zoom for both Nikon and Canon)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 10 фев 2025
- Follow me on Instagram - / realworldpicts
After releasing my review on the Nikon 18-300, I received many questions regarding the Tamron 18-400. I was fortunate to get my hands on this lens thanks to the good folks at Robert's Camera!
Super zoom lenses are very convenient but tend to exhibit warping and vignetting at wide angles to some extent. Warping at wide angles is more noticeable when shooting straight line landscapes. Nonetheless, this is easy to fix in post processing.
=== LINKS ===
Tamron 18-400 for Nikon: amzn.to/2EieUNn
Tamron 18-400 for Canon: amzn.to/2Xcg3xt
============
Enjoy the video!:)
I’ve been using the Tamron 18-400mm lens for a year and can say it is excellent. The AF works fine with my Canon and the image stabilization helps quiet the lens when it’s extended. The lens usually sells for about $600, making it a very good value.
Thanks for the feedback and agreed:).
I really don’t know why would you get any thumbs down on this video. Your time in explaining the lens plus the editing efforts, the metadata, the quality of shots, editing quality.. you sir are a giant amongst us. THANK YOU...!
Thanks for the post/feedback and glad to be of help!:) When I first started posting on RUclips, I wondered the same ... why would someone thumb-down a video? Was it offensive, etc.? I soon discovered that the internet is FULL of every opinion known to man ... good, bad, ugly, and something between:). If I do not find a video helpful, I simply move on ... no need throw hate. In fact, I typically applaud the publisher for putting forth the effort. Nonetheless, I sense some people were having a bad day and wanted to share their ill feelings. In the end I realized nobody can satisfy everybody:).
2024 and I just bought one for my 7200. Great lens 😊
awesome - i still love this lens today as well!:)
Hi Mark. Thank you so much for your videos. As a newbie photographer, I have been browsing through hundreds of youtube videos and most of them are geared towards people with thick wallets. A lot of us do not have a big budget or want to wait and see if this hobby is for us. Bought a second hand D3200 and instantly fell in love with it. However i just bought a new D5600 as I wanted the flip screen when using the tripod.
thanks for the post and glad to be of help/inspiration!:) sounds like you made a nice jump forward from the 3200 to the 5600 ... i like the 5600 for a variety of reasons including the flip screen:).
6:50 The Manual focus works well in manual mode.
When in Auto mode, you cannot adjust the focus like you would with other lenses.
This is why you felt that the ring was hard to rotate.
If you placed the switch into Manual mode, the ring rotates smoothly, easily and accurately.
Thanks for the post/comment Ron ... good to know/share:).
I like your “be safe” at the end of your videos, not common in the photography world, in my line of work we always say that to each other before we go out on the road.
Thanks for the post Enrique ... life is short and I feel a bit of prudence goes a long way. A simple kind gesture can make a difference in someone's day:).
@@RealWorld I'm a retired engineer from our space program and after the Challenger accident NASA and the contractors really enhanced their focus on safety. He couldn't hold a meeting without first giving a safety message of some sort. We recognized you can't dictate safety, it has to become way of life. I've been retired for 10 years and to this day along with saying "have a nice day" I find myself now adding "and be safe" to everyone. I'm amazed at the many surprised reactions I receive. All positive and it seems to be a more meaningful response to them so I receive a LOT of Thank You's in return. "Have a nice day and be safe"
You made me feel so much better about my decision. Thank you SO much sir. 🙏🏾✊🏾
Thanks for the post/feedback and glad to be of help!:)
I purchased a D3400 6 months ago after watching your comparison of the D3400 and D3500. I love it. Your videos are the best I have watched overall. Thank you and please keep them coming.
Thanks for the post Samuel and glad to be of help!:)
Just bought the Tamron 18-400mm (thanks primarily to your excellent review) and took it for a spin this past weekend in Washington DC and WOW !! That's ALL I will say. Very impressed and guess what? I put it on my D300s (seriously). This camera came out in 2009 and I fell madly in love with it so much so that I now have 4 bodies. I swear by this camera because, by now, I know EVERYTHING about it. Back to the lens though ... It is TOTALLY compatible with my old Nikon camera. I'm not a PRO, but I've been shooting, and selling pics now for about 30 years and have done VERY WELL selling my images, especially during the recent two-year pandemic. One question: Do you shoot with your ISO on automatic?
Thanks for the post/feedback and glad you enjoy the lens :)! It is solid on multiple fronts, and I continue to given praise to Tamron for the lens. I have shot in DC as well and appreciate the target rich environment:). I do use auto ISO and leverage a function button to adjust on the fly instead. I typically leave the ISO to 100 and open the aperture first if more light is needed. If still too dark, I will take a look at the shutter speed and if still too dark, I will raise the ISO. all of this depends on the desired results of the photo though :).
I love mine. It is not as good as a good prime lens, but it is pretty good and can shoot almost anything and you might not miss a shot while changing lenses and less dust will get in your camera.
I won this lens in a photo contest on Grey Learning Academy. It seems very good, and useful for almost any occasion. I agree, it is very solid feeling, and all the adjustments are very smooth. A big step up from most of my lenses.
NICE win Frank - that is awesome!:) Enjoy the lens!:)
lucky duck! congrats--great lens
I have that lens paired with my D500. I have caught amazing bird shots with it, and is is such a great all around lens.
Thanks for the post/feedback David!:) I feel the same ... a good/solid lens:).
Got the lens based mostly on your review...and I like it. Agree with your opinions of the lens...very versatile. Thank you for the excellent videos.
thanks for the post/feedback and glad to be of help!:)
You’re an amazing photographer. The images you capture are awesome.
Thanks for the post/feedback!:) I feel there is something unique to capture just about everywhere - we only need to look:).
I am a beginner bird & wildlife just for hobby. Is it worth to buy for that ?? I mean is it sufficient for bird and wildlife for beginners.
I think the 18-400 is a strong consideration for wildlife:). Some might say to go with a fixed lens and wide aperture, however that will cost will be super high!:)
Out of all the videos I have watched about this lens - You helped me to make my decision - Thank you sir for your time in putting this together, and your infectious enthusiasm - and by the way... Absolutely stunning images (especially the night shots - I love doing night shots and light painting) - For people who don't have allot of money, and must use what they have to get the job done, this lens will be a perfect fit for sure.
I love photography but don't have thousands to spend on equipment LOL
PS. I just subbed ;)
Thanks for the post/feedback Steven and glad to be of help!:) This is a great lens which fills a wide range. I like night shots as well and created a couple of videos that you might like and should be of some help ...
steel wool - ruclips.net/video/awXp9wvZo6w/видео.html
trailing lights - ruclips.net/video/TbSgl5e6h7I/видео.html
Beautiful, I will check them out, and thanks for the response...
I love the style of your reviews! As a newbie photographer, I have been trying to decide between the Nikon 18-300 and the Tamron 18-400 for a Nikon 5600. I think you have made my decision for me.
thanks for the post/feedback Chris and glad to be of help!:)
I was in same boat, have the D5600. I tried the Tamron , then gave up on it due to poor image quality. I just now replaced it with the nikon 18-300
Haha I'm in the eaxct same situation, just haven't tried any of the lenses. i guess D5600 is pretty popular huh?
Hi, please advise...... at 18mm which shows best quality..this Nikon lens or Tamron 18 to 400 mm....
Similarly at 300 mm....which of the two shows better results.
@@rogue277 thanks for sharing your experience. I'm on the same boat as you, so I guess I will go straight to the Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-300mm f/3.5-5.6G for my D5600👏
Tamron makes great lenses. quality parts, awesome coatings, and probably the best optical stabilization system in the business right now. I own their SP45 prime and it's a lens I love and cherish. build quality is really impressive. But really though, it's the man(or woman) behind the equipment. you are an awesome photographer. Amazing looking shots. Lately I've been frustrated with my aps-c sensor camera because I can't get shot that look that good and thought about moving into full frame then I see your video and am reminded that it's not my equipment. I'll keep learning and practice, practice, practice... always enjoy your vids. thanks.
Thanks for the post/feedback!:) Agreed - Tamron and Sigma make good quality lenses in my experience. Sounds like you are on the right path as well ... keep shooting ... practice, practice, practice, and practice some more:). A bit of knowledge and experience can go a long way regardless of equipment to some extent:).
Very underrated post - Great insight!
I myself have seen myself "wanting more" from the camera, but it's more in terms of functions rather than for quality in my pictures.
But I do understand your line of thought!
I own this lens. It's a great all-around lens. A bit on the heavier side.
Thank you very much for your time and effort.
Glad to be of help and agreed:). A bit of the heavy side but the weight also lends to a solid build/construction:).
Great video! I too own this lens have had it since Sept 2018 it is on a Canon T6i/750D, went to the Caribbean on Celebrity Cruise lines in November shot hundreds of photos a few stinkers but hey that's the way things go. Overall I was very happy with its performance. This Tamron is my walk around lens, I very rarely change to my prime Canon 24mm pancake lens, and I never use the 18-55mm kit lens. It spends its time on the shelf with my older Pentax and Minolta 35mm film cameras and an assortment of lenses. BTW this lens is compatible with Tamrons Tap-in base allowing focal adjustment @18, 35, 50, 70, 100, 200, 300 and 400mm over 3 distance zones (0,45m, 3m, and infinity).
Thanks for the post/feedback Daniel!:) Sounds like a great opportunity for photos:). Agreed as well - if using the 18-400 or 18-300, I would sideline the 18-55:).
Thank you very much for this great Video and Review! I am still quite new to DSLR, but just bought my first own Camera (after borrowing several others before). It is a Nikon D5600. As a lense, I got a Tamron 18-200 but watching this Review, I am considering to maybe upgrade it before heading for a long backpacking trip this fall to the 18-400. Would you recommend doing so or will the 18-200 be sufficient for some bird and landscape photography? And will the extra weight of approx 310g make it too heavy? Alongside one of the 18-200/400 I am planning to carry on a 35mm f/1.8... Thank you very much in advance.
Thanks for the post/feedback/question!:) I really like the 18-400 - this is a solid lens with many great attributes. I also shot with the 18-200 for many years - a great all around lens as well. Would I upgrade to the 18-400? The extra 200mm will provide extra reach for wildlife, however you can capture wildlife with the 18-200 as well. If I only had the 18-55 and/or the 70-300 and did not already own the 18-200, I would strongly consider the 18-400. If I already had the 18-200, I might pass:). You could always sell the 18-200 and buy the 18-400 lowering your total cost of ownership though:).
"Let's jump right in and have some fun" - I'm addicted :-) great review as always, I think the most important thing is the info on the top corner of each shoot . I would recommend to write the aperture range for this particular lens in the title.
LOL - thanks for the post/feedback!:) I thought the same regarding the aperture range as I have received a few questions on the topic:).
such an underrated channel
If I want to upgrade my 55-300 for wildlife photography. Would you recommend this over the nikon af-p DX 70-300mm f4.5-6.3 ed vr lense? Im guessing the 70-300mm will be a lot more Sharper and provide better quality shots on the d3400? And be worth that loss of 100mm?
Thanks for the post/question:). I might lean towards the 18-400. I have shot with both and feel the 18-400 produces solid/sharp images on par with the Nikon 70-300. Both are good/solid but if you want the extra 100mm, go for the 18-400. One additional note/consideration - because the Tamron offers a great zoom range, you will experience a bit more warping at the extremes.
@@RealWorld Thanks for that. Seeing a lot of great shots with this in manual but with auto iso. Do you ever shoot in manual auto iso?
Excellent review as usual, thanks- loved the images you took, especially the night ones. Keep up the good work!
Thanks for the post/feedback Neil!:) Night shots are fun and typically cap a long day of shooting a review like this one:).
@@RealWorld I've always struggled trying to capture decent night photos especially around Christmas time with all of the beautiful outside lighting decorations. I've actually had the most success using my SAMSUNG GALAXY S10 phone camera LOL.
Excellent review. I'm buying one TOMORROW. Question: Do you recomment setting the ISO to auto?
i suspect you have the lens by now and put it through the paces - i really like this lens :). i typically shoot with manual ISO and quickly adjust as needed to gain a proper exposure. i control the aperture to maintain exposure at the lower ISO and adjust the ISO secondarily. if you shoot is auto ISO (which I have done before as well), set the max to something you are good with - for example, 1600 (although i have shot with much higher as well) :).
Based on the specs, I could easily see this lens being part of a travel system. Get an 18-400mm and then match it with 2-3 great prime lenses for faster pictures or shallower depth of field.
Fully agree James!:) I like to take my fixed 50 or fixed 35 along for the ride:).
Mark, thank you for a very nice demonstration of this beast. Is it possible for you to release some of the samples you have taken in this video? Thx.
I have considered creating a generic dropbox account for the channel ... stay tuned:).
Thanks for the review. Have you tried teleconverter with this lens ? I am using this lens with Canon 77D but for birds at far I feel helpless.
i have not used a teleconverter with this lens but doing so would be a good option for additional reach, however it will slow the aperture.
Still a great video 5 years down the road.
thanks for the post!:) it is fun to look bad at this video. i recall the coooooold day:).
I was wondering if you might give this lens a test run! Thanks - this has been super helpful, as with all of your photography vids. Much appreciated!
Thanks for the feedback and glad to be of help!:)
Love your videos and work. Very clean and concise, you have helped me a lot with photography over the course of the past year or so. Thank you! I think I am going to rent this lens, it looks like it would be great for a walk around lens on my travels.
Thanks for the post/feedback Bryan and glad to be of help!:) Agreed - I think this might be a good all-around walk-around lens ... let me know your thoughts if you get the chance to test it.
Thanks for the great review. I commented about the Sigma 18-300 and how I was interested in that, but now I'm thinking this lens or that one. Your reviews really help a lot.
Sigma and Tamron make good quality lenses in my opinion. I might lean towards the Tamron 18-400 as you get a bit more reach with a very similar build quality:).
@@RealWorld Thank you. Is there any other way I could contact you? I have a few questions.
Sure ... you can try realworldpicts@gmail.com ... I do not check it too often but this might be of the best option:).
You have sold it too me! Thank you for another brilliant video.
Another great video! I recently purchased the Tamron 10-24mm f3.5 Di II HLD and love it! If all the Tamron lenses are like this one I’ll be spending the extra money for a Tamron!
Thanks for the post/feedback Matt!:) Yes, this lens feels no different in my opinion - solid and well constructed.
My brother has a Nikon D7000 and wanted to buy this lens but not sure if the mount fits or not? A seller from Shopee says its not suitable so i wonder if it needs adapter or what? Thanks in advance! Happy shooting!
Thanks for the post/question!:) The Tamron 18-400 will fit on the D7000 without any issue (I have the D7000 as well:)). I am not certain if the seller misunderstood the question or perhaps I am mission something as well:).
I was considering investing in the 18-400mm lens for my nikon D3400 ,but then realized that the Nikon A900 camera that I also have has a zoom which is equal to 450mm. So with that being said will use the small kit lens along with the A900 for my zoom shots. A 2 camera deal .. Keep up the good work
Thanks for the post/comment!:) Ahhhh yes, the A900 - a nice super zoom camera. The one major challenge to the A900 is the sensor size.
Hi from the UK,(Wales) have you ever thought about coming over the pond and doing some photo shoots.thanks for all the good advice you have given throughout the years, and for fighting the cause for the entry level camera's 👍
thanks for the post/feedback Vincent!:) i have given some thought to taking a road trip but have not settled on a location(s). Wales might make for an interesting visit!:)
Great review, I bought this lens to go with my Nikon D7500, very pleased!
Excellent reviews and photographs 📸 👍👌
Night shot where just great Bro ...lens seems to be quiet good, except for vignetting part, which also doesn't seem to be in the sample shoots u have done Bro...great video Bro ...pls keep it up
Thanks for the post/feedback!:) Ahhhh yes, good point with regards to vignetting:). If I experienced any, I may have corrected it in Lightroom:).
I have that 18/400mm lens from Tamron and I got to say that the best lens I ever had just when I do long exposure or shooting the Moon or landscape photography but I haven't tried portrait yet but I will say I recommend that lends to anybody
Thanks for the feedback Mike ... nice to hear your experiences:). Seems like a solid well constructed lens:).
@@RealWorld yes it did
Post some bird photos from that lens
asnfhtm lzxsje I use the 18-400 mm for half a year or so for wildlife, birdfotography is really good with this lens, the quality is good although you can’t get a really really Sharp picture on 400 mm. But in general I’m very happy with lens
@@wiltho1574 thanks for reply. If possible kindly share bird and wild life photographes from this lens
Good video! I just picked up this lens used for a good price in almost new condition. Loving it on my D500!.
Thanks for the post Ed!:) Ahhhh yes - really like the D500 as well! :)
This lens got my attention. The range is amazing. It sure beats a smartphone.
Ahhhh yes, I have given thought to creating a vid on smartphone photography:).
@@RealWorld My Samsung Galaxy S10 takes better photos than my NIKON D70. On a recent 6,000 mile motor home trip we took last Sept I took ALL 1500 travel photos with my cell phone, including some short videos.
Thanks for the review. I like your videos and learned a lot from them.
I have a question; do you prefer this lens (tamron 18-400) to the Nikon 80-400mm?
Ahhhhh yes, the Nikon 80-400 ( amzn.to/2Emv60j ) is a great lens but pricey in my opinion:). Given the costs, I might lean towards the Tamron 18-400 unless you have extra money in the budget:).
I would like to know how that lens does in video mode? I shoot both still and video on my Canon and want something that will work really well for both...?
not bad - may see if I can get a demo/sample video using the lens at some point.
@@RealWorld I was worried that some lenses make a bit of noise that can be audible in video or are not as smooth with the autofocus, etc when doing video. This does seem like a fantastic travel lens for photos because of the huge versatility of zoom ranges.
You have a good point regarding video and sound. I have shot with various other lenses when recording video and focusing sound can be heard depending on the lens. Nikon makes an AF-P lens which is similar to the Canon STM lenses. The idea behind the AF-P is to create a silent focus system to minimize noise. I have tested the AF-P lenses and they work well to prevent focusing noise, however the same cannot be said for the AF-S lenses:). I am not certain how this Tamron lens will work with focusing noise on video though:).
Nice shots! I especially like the snaps of the LDS Temple (Mormon Temple).
Yes, the Angel on top of the Temple is Gold Plated, and is the same on top of All LDS temples.
Ahhhh interesting and thank you:).
I'm a little confused by some of the comments regarding the auto focus mode...Will the AF work in auto mode with the D3400?...Thanks in advance...I love your videos.
Thanks for the post/question Steve and welcome to the channel!:) Regarding AF - yes, AF will work in auto mode and in all modes unless you purposely enable manual focus:).
@@RealWorld Thanks again...Just picked it up for $350...Will be using it for our Alaskan cruise in August!!
Ahhhhhh nice!:) Sounds like a great deal ... when you get the lens, take time to practice, practice, and practice some more. Getting comfortable with the lens and camera will be huge advantage on your trip. Enjoy the trip and be safe!:)
@@stevestreeter3622 I have also just purchased the Tamron 18-400 and will be using it with my D5600 on an Alaskan cruise in May, as well as in the Canadian Rockies. Have fun!
@@chriswinter5834 Hey thanks!!....I got a deal at $350 on ebay and couldn't pass it up...Good Luck!!
Great review! I'm looking for a lens to take on our Alaskan cruise in a few months and this looks like a winner. I just found your channel and the instant you started shooting, I said, "That's Indianapolis!" I grew up there but live in Arizona now. :-)
Thanks for the post/feedback Scott and sounds like you will have a great opportunity to capture some awesome shots!:) LOL - yes, Indianapolis is the heart of Hoosier land!:) I have taken many trips to Phoenix year ago ... blazing hot in the summer but nice in the winter:). I have a handful of downtown shots in my review video on the fixed 35 and fixed 50 as well.
Question
I have a nikon z 6ii..Tamron says it is compatible. If I were to use a 2x extender should I use tamrons or nikons ?
An excellent video on the Tamron 18-400 lens. I am wondering how it compares to the 80-400mm AF Nikon in Sharpness.
surprisingly well in my opinion:). I like both but feel the Tamron is equally sharp.
What do you think about adding a 2x teleconverter with this lens?
This is doable:). I did not have one available otherwise I would have test in the video. :)
I have Nikon D5200. And if I fit this lens to that, do I need to upgrade camera software or anything else I need to consider to make it better?
Thanks in advance.
Helpful video. Traveling to Hawaii with Nikon D750. Considering this as the travel lens. For balance, also considering a prime lens of 35mm or 50mm. Any suggestions?
Hawaii will be an awesome photo adventure!:) I really like your thought process ... a great/solid camera body (D750), a great/solid versatile lens (18-400), and one great/solid fixed lens (either the 35 or the 50 (both are awesome (if i had to chose, i would lean towards the 50)). not certain i would bring anything else given the size/weight of everything except a joby gorillapod. when i am on a photo adventure, i take mostly the same! :)
I am sure glad I found your review on this lens. I am about to purchase a D7500 and have really been trying to figure out what bundle deal I should consider. Nikon had the two lens pkg (18-55 and the 70-300) and also with just the 18-140. A local camera shop in Central Florida has it packaged with this TAMRON 18-400 lens. I was afraid I might be giving something up with just having this TAMRON lens. Would you recommend a second lens, say the 18-55 or 18-140 to go with this or do you feel this single lens would be fine by itself? On my old D70 I primarily use the 18-70 but also carry the 70-300 (both NIKON lenses). The auto focus on my 18-70 quit working hence why I finally started looking at upgrading plus wanting to get the VT capability. I wish I could find someone who would bundle a lower zoom NIKON lens with this TAMRON lens. What are your thoughts?
Thanks for the post/feedback/question:). Since you asked, I would suggest the following providing your budget allows for it: go for the Tamron 18-400 and the Nikon fixed 50 or 35 (both are solid (if I had to choose, I would lean towards the 50)). The 18-400 is incredible versatile and can remain on the body most of the time. The 50 or 35 is GREAT for portraits (both open to f/1.8 which is great). I created a review vid on both which you can find on my channel:).
@@RealWorld Many thanks for the reply. I'm now committed to getting the Tamron 18-400 but have also looked at the NIKON 10-20 and the Tamron 10-24. My thinking for a lens in that range is for when I'm inside and/or close quarters where you just can't back up far enough. I just checked on B&H and see they have SIX 50mm Nikon lenses with prices all over the place and they all look alike. Very confusing to say the least. They have a Tamron 45mm f1.8 that has VC image stabilization built in and that's something I don't see in any of the Nikon 50mm lens.
Great review. Very helpful format and info. Thank you. Honestly though, I'm more interested in the rig this video was shot with. The video itself is so sharp. What did you use?
Thanks for the post/feedback Ryan!:) Ahhhh yes ... I believe this video was taken with the Panasonic G7. I believe this is the same camera I used to capture photos in another video ... ruclips.net/video/7JbO7E9vCNA/видео.html ... this is relatively affordable/solid camera that I tested over the course of a few months.
I’m doing some research on camera lenses and coming across this one it seems really good. Would you recommend this lens?? Would it be able to shoot any type of photography whether it’s street, portrait landscape?? Does it work well in low light conditions?
Thanks for the post/question:). If you are look for an all-around lens, this is a great choice IMO. I put this lens through the paces ... it is solid and will handle work well in most situations (street, portrait, landscape, etc.). After shooting with it for awhile, you might consider a fixed 35 or fixed 50 for portraits as both offer a wide open aperture.
Your reviews are excellent! I own both the Tamron 18-400 and the Nikon 18-300 3.5-6.3. My wife and I are seniors and we are contemplating a trip to Machu Picchu next fall. I want to carry the lightest zoom lens possible at 10,000 feet with my D7500. Which of these two lenses would you recommend for this trip? Thanks!
this is a late reply but hopefully not too late:). i might suggest the tamron 18-400 ... you will get extra reach, a solid build quality, and great/solid results:).
@@RealWorld Thanks! The images from the Tamron lens appear sharper also.
I have watched your video on this lens and the Nikon 18-300mm lens. If you had to choose one of them over the other which would you choose and why? I am going to Europe for 2 weeks and only want to take one lens. I have learned tons from your videos and would like your opinion. Thank you for your videos.
Thanks for the post/question Katie:). If given the choice, I might lean towards the Tamron 18-400:). The Tamron feels solid, produces great quality (similar to the 18-300), and has more reach at a similar price point compare to Nikon. Sounds like you have a great adventure ahead. Take time to completely familiarize yourself with the camera/capabilities and travel safe!:)
Great video. I’m thinking of buying this lens for my Nikon camera. It has great reviews. Since it’s over a year old, is there any newer lens you would recommend with about the same price/features?
Thanks for the feedback/question:). This still a solid/awesome lens today and will be for many years in my opinion:). Lenses tend to hold their value and withstand time for the most part:).
I have just brought this lens, swapped my Nikon 18-200mm, great for walk about, no weight to carry not un-like when l have my four pro lenses with me plus tripod, l would recommend the Tamron 18-400mm but remember it has been designed for the smaller sensor,
Thanks for the post/feedback ... a nice/solid lens!:)
Great information sir! But I have a question- I am using Nikon d5200. Do you think Tamron 18-400 should be a better choice than Nikon 18-300 for my camera? Or should I select a different lens altogether in this range considering my camera model is old now?
If you are looking for a wide zoom range, I would lean towards the Tamron over the Nikon:). Both are good choices and will produce great results, however I feel the Tamron has a slight better build quality and offers an extra 100mm of zoom:).
@@RealWorld Perfect! You just made my day!! Thank you!
Hello .. thank you four your videos , they always help me to get new tips ., I am wondering if this lens is good for a Nikon 7500 series .. I will really appreciated your answer .. have a nice day
Glad to be of help!:) Ahhhh yes ... this would be a great lens to pair with the D7500. This is a solid lens and I really like the 7000 series as well:).
I don’t think there is any lens that you can’t shoot with. Very well done with the images.
Thanks for the post/confidence Dennis!:) Makes me think to get the worst of the worst and see what can be done ... hmmmm - might make for a good video:).
I have nikon 18-135 without VR. I considered to upgrade for tamron 18-200 3.5 -6.3. this is much cheap then nikon 18-200 and aparture is a bit more close....do you have any experience with this tamron? As all around zoom lens for travel
Ahhhh yes ... I have shot with both the Tamron 18-200 and Nikon 18-200. I started with the Tamron and switched to Nikon. The only reason I switched was because a family member sold me the Nikon at a great/family rate:). The Tamron was fine with no memorable issues that I can recall. The 18-200 is a GREAT all around lens/length in my opinion. I left it on my camera most of the time and carried a fixed 50 in my bag for various shots. If you want more range, I really like the Tamron 18-400 as well. Nonetheless, I felt 200 satisfied my needs for the most part (not certain anybody made a 18-400 when I had the 18-200).
@@RealWorld thanks , I have the opportunity to buy it very cheap. I will test it and share some photos.
As you are a more experienced photographer than me, i do have a question:
Actually between an old tamron 70-300 (manufactured on 2010) and this new 18-400 (2017) . Would still have a sense to buy a 70-300 as they have barely similar price? Does those 7 years differences improved the overall sharpness on this lens to let the 70-300 on the shelves?
I do have the 18-400....but I'? Curious to know what's your point of view about having a comparision of them.
I haven't used either, but usually a specialized lens will give you better pictures than a super zoom lens.
Thanks for the question:). If I had the 18-400, I would not get the 70-300:). If I had the 70-300, I might consider the 18-400 primarily for the extra range and not so much for the additional clarity. I have shot with both and feel they both can produce nice quality images giving a slight edge to the 18-400:).
@@RealWorld I think the 18-400 would eliminate having to change lenses. I just bought the 18-200 and wish it had more zoom
Hi Ive just been getting this lens, I'm hoping it's going to be good for my vacation to Mexico in June. I don't want to take my 18-55mm or the 70-300mm lens.. Do you think this lens will do me? :) I'm going to the jungle part also a beach etc what do you think?so I'll be taking scenery pictures and also wildlife :)
Ahhhhh yes, this would be a great lens to take ... a great/solid versatile lens capable of capture great images. I ran with a 18-200 for many years and would have run with the 18-400 if available. I might also suggest either the fixed 50 ( ruclips.net/video/e2TZVu7yZig/видео.html ) or fixed 35 ( ruclips.net/video/BG0eZZaMmYE/видео.html ) for portraits. You can take portraits with the 18-400 but the other two options offer a much wider aperture which is great for the nice soft backgrounds:). Enjoy your trip and be safe!:)
Thank you for the review. Please keep them coming. They are just great.
Oh I noticed you changed the background music, kinda liked the old one. Stay safe!
Thanks for the post/feedback:). I am working for find new background music - stay tuned:).
Hi, nice video, I had a Tamron 70-300 lens earlier that broke and was looking to replace it, I was tempted to get this one, but wasn't sure about the Macro, on the previous lens I had there was a "Macro" button you press when zoomed in to max and then the motor would switch into focus mode, using the AF-CS modes with the Nikon I was able to get really good pictures, I don't know about the 18-400 lens, would you be able to achieve similar Macro results?! thanks a lot
Thanks for the post ... hmmm - not certain I have tested the 70-300. Nonetheless, I typically use a true macro lens or extension tubes when shooting macros (true macro lenses represent a 1:1 relationship on the sensor). I really like the 18-400 though and suspect it would do well with extreme zooms/macros.
I’m thinking of this lens for my canon 750d I use the tamron 18-200 at for showjumping pics seems to work fine but we use bigger arenas now so need a bit more than the 200 lens is this lens in your opinion good for sports thanks
Thanks for the post/question John!:) Ahhhh yes - horses I suspect? Nonetheless, yes, I feel this would be the best lens for the money. The Tamron 18-400 ( amzn.to/2Xcg3xt ) is a solid lens in my opinion ... solid build/feel and solid quality. Tamron did a great job with this lens, and this should work well for you needs. Note - we using greater zoom, the aperture will start to close down a bit - not a huge deal as you can simply increase the ISO in order to increase the shutter speed if needed (faster shutters mean you can freeze the horse in action).
I have the Nikon 18-300 3.5-5.6. On my recent trip to NZ I found it to be my go to lens. Looks like the Tamron is a good lens also, and would make a great travel lens.
Also do you have any input on using a FX lens on a DX body?
Thanks for the post/question:). Sounds like a good trip for some good photos:). The 18-300 is a solid lens as well. I have used FX lenses on DX bodies without any issues (for example the Nikon fixed 50). You can use a FX lens on a DX body but not a DX lens on a FX body:).
@@RealWorld not totally true ... on Nikon you can use DX lenses on FX, it just goes into DX Mode. You loose resolution - not a big deal for D8xx but others it might.
Hi, i was bought this lens. For the money worth it. But my problem is when I put it on tripod it is unstable. Because it is too heavy. Do you know is that any collar for this lens available?
Thanks!
Good question re the collar ... hmmmm - I will need to dig into this more:). My setup seems relatively solid but I could see it become unstable if the lens is fully extended and the legs are not fully spread, etc.
@@RealWorld I have noticed also when is extended. Because of this I am not able to do some photos.
I have take photo of the moon by holding with hands. And it's better than with tripod. Quality is really good.
Please see for collar , because I can't find any.
Appreciate your work and because of your videos im owner of D3400 and Tamron 18-400. If you have time to look my Instagram rene.rovisan.photography just to give me some advice what can do better.
Don't need to like or subscribe.
Thanks a lot. Waiting for collar option! :-)
Looking for a travel light solution. Thanks for your excellent review as usual.
Glad to be of help ... a great all around lens in my opinion!:)
Really ggod review but i just have one big question! I am photographing planes and i need a lens that is focusing really fast! Is this lens focusing fast enough for shooting planes!?
Thanks for the post/question:). It is not the fastest focusing lens but not bad in my opinion. This might depend on how fast the plane is traveling and how close you are located to it:). I used a similar lens at a local air show a few years ago with good success.
I have that exact setup! I love the lens. Most of my best shots are on that lens. Great video!
Thanks for the post/feedback Michael!:) Nice to hear your experience with the lens ... seems very solid and well constructed in my opinion:).
@@RealWorld your videos have helped me make lots of choices on gear, first the body, then the zomei tripod! You give us subscribers such amazing content and experience.
Glad to be of help Michael!:)
Cool and very informative video as usual. I think this is a good lens. İt is like all-in-one for beginners. And the pictures you shot look sharp to me. Maybe it is the ability of d3400😄. (The Squirrel was so cute😄).
Thanks for the post/feedback:). This is a good/solid all-in-one super zoom lens choice in my opinion. I saw the squirrel at the cemetery feeding on a nut. He paused for a few seconds which allowed to compose and snap the shot:). The 400mm was a big plus in getting the shot given the distance between myself and the squirrel:).
I have this on a Canon M50 (with canon adapter) but bought it when I had a T7i. I love the range of the lens, and the solid feel. Sometimes I think it's a touch slow to lock focus while it's adapted. I never noticed any lag on the T7i.
Trying to shoot birds and indoor low light (horse riding) I think I've outgrown my camera 😳😂.
Thanks for the post!:) Shooting wildlife can be challenging ... having fast AF, a wide open aperture, and many focal points are key:).
Planning this lens on the m50. Do you like the quality on higher zoom? Thanks!
@@rajeevnarayan4705 I do like the lens overall in decent light. I've been photographing a lot of birds lately. I love the reach of the lens and can't complain about sharpness. Pushing the ISO on the M50 to compensate for the 6.3 aperture and freeze a flying bird in the early / late hours or in the woods is where it falls apart for me. Focus wise, the images seem plenty sharp. Sensor noise is another story.
I have no complaints about the lens when I can keep the ISO lowish. I really like that I can take only this lens on a walk and have a lot of freedom composing an image. I sometimes keep a 10 - 18 in my pocket to go wider if it fits the scene. I've dabbled with video a little and have no complaints there either.
One last thought. If you plan to move up to full frame in the future, this lens is designed for APS C sensors.
Does the front element of the lens rotate? If so using filters could be challenging.
Thanks for the post/question ... no, the element is firm with only the focus ring rotating.
This lens is fantastic when paired with my T7i Canon, love it.
a solid combination IMO:) ... really like the video on the T7i
Hey, I’m looking into buying the Canon T7i and I was just wondering does this lens work well with it?? What sort of things do you use the lens for?
@@LannsYT I would no longer reccomend this lens, up to a week ago this was my favorite lens, but a week ago the lens barrel began getting much stiffer, and at 3/4 zoom or beyond it stopped focusing. Now, a week later and you have to force the lens to even half way zoom and it will now only focus up to half way zoom, the lens is basiclly dying as I try to use it and this is a brand new lens. I had been using it daily to do photography in Acadia National Park.
@@LannsYT I would no longer reccomend this lens, up to a week ago this was my favorite lens, but a week ago the lens barrel began getting much stiffer, and at 3/4 zoom or beyond it stopped focusing. Now, a week later and you have to force the lens to even half way zoom and it will now only focus up to half way zoom, the lens is basiclly dying as I try to use it and this is a brand new lens. I had been using it daily to do photography in Acadia National Park.
I wonder how it will do chasing birds around? I have a Nikon 28-300 and it seems to blow a lot of dirt on my sensor
Thanks for the post/question:). This is not the fastest lens but overall solid. I suspect the speed to lock focus is similar to the 28-300 although I have not done a comparison.
Looks like a good option to consider, most could buy this lens and it would replace everything in their bag
Agreed although it lacks a nice/wide aperture found on various fixed and shorter zooms (i.e. the fixed 35 or fixed 50 have a f/1.8) ... nonetheless, this is a great all-around lens in my opinion.
@@RealWorld you are 100% correct on the aperture, I was just thinking it would be an excellent travel lens
I have an Tamron 18-270 which has proved to be a great travel lens. Next time my daughter takes it I will get one of these!
What wide angle lens do you recommend?
What about the nikon 10-20?
Do we have any benefits with entry level dslr like d3300 with additional wide angle lens ?
Thanks for the post/question:). I might suggest the following 3 lenses: 1) the Nikon 10-20 ( amzn.to/2Wbn8km ) 2) the Tokina 11-16 ( amzn.to/2W7qhBM ) 3) the Sigma 10-20 ( amzn.to/2ErabsH ). Two benefits to using a dedicated wide angle lens: 1) you get a wider field of view which is relatively obvious considering you can open to 10mm:) 2) you significantly reduce the likelihood of warping which is found when shoot at 18mm on a super zoom lens like the 18-300 (still noticeable on the 18-55 but not as much). Hope this helps!:)
Thank you for this video. I own the Tamrom 18-400 and have noticed that the reach at 400mm is very comparable to my Nikon 18-300 at around 200mm. 300mm on the Nikon is very noticeably closer. I've tested both on a Nikon 7100 and an older D80 bodies. Is this an issue with the Tamron lens or the camera bodies I'm using? Thanks for your opinions.
Because of what's called focus breathing (more evident in some lenses than others) the actual focal length of some lenses may shorten when you zoom out to objects which are close at hand. As you focus on objects which are further away the focus breathing effect reduces with the distance, until the lens magnification represents its actual focal length. If you focus on something 400 yards away with both lenses at maximum focal length, the Tamron should produce a slightly bigger image than the Nikon. If you focus on something 5 yards away with both lenses at their maximum focal length then the Nikon should produce a bigger image . . .
Always like your video, great work man, support you from Hong Kong!
Thanks for the post/feedback and welcome from the United States!:)
I have this lens and the MF ring is super easy to move, not tight at all. However, there is a slight tightness when extending the lens between 35mm to 200mm. No real worries here. So far happy with it.
Thanks for the post/feedback Janice ... I noticed the same but nothing major - I also believe this may soften a bit over time:).
Which lens is better:
Tamron 18-400 3.5-6.3 vs Nikon 70-300 f4.5-5.6
While both are solid/worthy, I might lean towards the Tamron :).
I like the work you do. Keep it up!!
Thanks for the feedback Roy!:)
What do you think which one has better image quality nikon 18 300mm or Tamron 18 400mm
Hmmmm ... good question!:) I feel both are VERY comparable but I like the Tamron build quality slightly more than Nikon.
I'll ask again because I never got an answer. What are your thoughts on shooting at ISO auto?
I am new to nikon camera. I am considering to add used lenses buying from ebay. But it is a bit scary to choose and buy them without a second thought about whether they will fit. I found that there are variety of lenese, such as non ai, ai, af, f mount an so on. These terms are not clear to me. Please kindly make a general guideline video whenever you have time, explaining nikon series lenses and their exchageabilities. Thanks!
I do not have a vid on this topic - yet, but might consider creating one:). I can see where someone might be confused over the differences.
Use Tamron lenses for Nikon. Nikkor lenses suck and r too costly.
RealWorld thanks! It will be very helpful video!^^
Better than a video, here is a list kenrockwell.com/nikon/compatibility-lens.htm - I wouldn't agree with most of what Ken Rockwell says about cameras and lenses, but this list will help you.
And just to make it short for you ... I tried old lenses (AF, AI types) on various camera bodies and they didn't do it for me. Even cheap kit style lenses like the AF-P 70-300 or 18-300 perform better in sharpness and speed to the old lenses. If you are new to photography and Nikon stick to the newer stuff IMO
The video quality is nice here, but I couldn't tell exactly what point you were focused on in the photos. My eyes were scrambling to find clear focus points. So, this is probably a really good camera for reference photos, but not necessarily for the best quality shot of each subject?
Thanks for the post/feedback James. I like to use the rule of thirds some most subjects with be to the left or right third of the composition (not always as some are centered). Nonetheless, ensure you are viewing the video at the highest quality (1080p). RUclips will default video playback to a low quality which results is relatively fuzzy images:).
The composition was nice. I was trying to find the points you focused the lense on. What exact point of a scene, maybe a tree limb instead of a larger statue. I'll watch it again & be sure of the settings. Thank you for replying.
I have a Canon SL2, and I think I'm gonna buy these lenses... but I still don't know if it's worth it or it's better to change my camera for a Nikon P1000. What do you think?
Thanks for the post Laura:). I had my hands on the P1000 which is an interesting camera. I see the P1000 used for 2 purposes - 1) wildlife 2) moon. The camera has a very small sensor compared to the SL2. I might stay with the SL2 unless you are really into the moon:).
thank you for your response @@RealWorld :) I'm gonna stay with my SL2 for now, but now my doubt is about lenses...between a Tamron 18-400 or a Tamron/Sigma 150-600...I like all kind of photography, specially wildlife and bird photography, so I'm not sure if the 400 lense really worth it for that kind of photography. I would appreciate your advice (again) :)
Great job describing the performance of the lens.
Sir please make one video about Star or milky way photograpy. What is aperture, shutter speed, ISO, focal length etc.
I like that camera lens im going to buy one for my 80d and the 10-24 and the 35mm so i definitely got to have that camera lens all from tamron
Amazing Video as usual..Thank you so much for this...Having used to shoot wih my Nikon P500 (24-810mm 35mm equiv) I am sometime feeling the lack of flexibility with my D3400 with the 3 different lenses i got...Hopefully I will get this sometine in the near future.
Thanks for the post/feedback!:) Ahhhh yes, the P500 has an extensive zoom although small sensor. The Tamron 18-400 gets you close with a far better/larger sensor:).
RealWorld Yes that's why I am hoping to get the Tamron 18-400...best lens for all rounder performance i think.
Will you prefer the 16 300 or the 18 400 from tamron?
And does the pics on your video are postprocessed or not? Just to having an idea how's the performing the vignetting and warping without it.
I'm still in doubt abour which lens for my Canon 77d for traveling in U.S. Arizona-Utah national parks....
After shooting with both, I might lean towards the 18-400:). It's just a solid lens with extra reach and bit less expensive. I tend to like manufacturer equipment/glass but might lean towards Tamron in this case although both are solid:). Since I shot in RAW, I post processed to some extent in Lightroom but nothing over-the-top:).
@@RealWorld So your pictures on the videos were originally with some vignetting? Or don't you notice it?
LOL - good catch!:) I like a light vignetting depending on the scene:).
In my opinion it is more a perfect lens for vacations in southern regions with plenty of light. I hope that something Tamaron will release a version for Sony.
will this be a plug and play for Canon Eos m50 sir? or do I still need an adaptor?
Your gonna need an adaptor. Those m50s take a wierd lense mount that are pretty expensive.
I echo Matt's comment as well ... you will need an adaptor.
Thanks for the video. Is it possible to have comparison between Tamron 16-300mm and 18-400mm ?
I will see if I can get my hands on one (the 16-300):)