GM 2.7 L3B Turbo engine! Characteristics, overview, common problems!

Поделиться
HTML-код

Комментарии • 39

  • @RK-ds7im
    @RK-ds7im 10 часов назад +1

    GM has low key nailed this engine execution. It is powerful/fuel efficient/quiet/light/reliable. Great job GM 👏

  • @RK-ds7im
    @RK-ds7im 10 часов назад

    I own a 2023 2.7T and am really happy with it! Great torque/smooth/quiet/good overall fuel economy. Amazing on highways through the mountains.

  • @ericj810
    @ericj810 10 дней назад +7

    216k and counting. No issues.

  • @banditoandy9784
    @banditoandy9784 3 дня назад +1

    the new ones have an aluminum oil pan, updated high output version relies on up to 27 psi of boost. AFM system is not an issue in these DOHC motors, GM is only finding issues with that on the 5.3 and 6.2.

  • @andysteward8617
    @andysteward8617 13 дней назад +6

    Been a professional mechanic 1987, seen a lot of small displacement, turbo charged GM product’s hit the market over those years, none of them held their value, nor were they reliable past the warranty date/mileage. I expect this to be no different. Laughable thing to me, is this turbo’ed 2.7L, gets worse mileage than the 4.8L, or the 4.3L. What a joke!!!

    • @ericj810
      @ericj810 10 дней назад

      Anything boosted gets lower mileage.

    • @philipeli1192
      @philipeli1192 3 дня назад

      Turbos=low reliability,direct injection=carbon. GM sucks.

  • @johnlittle6711
    @johnlittle6711 Месяц назад +1

    I just bought the same gmc reg cab short bed like the one shown and love it! And with the recent 10 speed tranny issue the turbo max with the updated 8 speed is looking like the most dependable option from gm.

  • @joew6277
    @joew6277 Месяц назад +2

    It makes 430ftlbs of torque now. I think they only gave the original figure. Plus they use an internal baffle, similar to an oil catch can for the pcv to help with carbon. Does it work? I don’t know but I haven’t seen any issues yet.

  • @Ransomeware1
    @Ransomeware1 Месяц назад +7

    I would not choose the ford eco boost engine over this gm engine.

    • @danielbonner8309
      @danielbonner8309 Месяц назад +1

      So far it has better reliability than the Ecoboosts but the 2.7 Ecoboost takes it out in performance.

    • @ericj810
      @ericj810 10 дней назад +1

      2.7 eco boost may perform a lil better. Lower gear 10 speed transmission then the 8 speed chevy. But the eco boost will blow b4 the turbo max will. Drop a lower gear in the chevy it will run the eco boost. The 8 speed actually tows very well on the chevy 2.7. Wasn't built or geard for break neck acceleration.

  • @hphillips7425
    @hphillips7425 2 дня назад

    I hope government motors is successful because I am sick of my tax dollars going to bailouts

  • @ArkansasChainsaw
    @ArkansasChainsaw 23 дня назад

    love mine with the turbomax 2.7l crew cab 4x4 only issue is at 20 mph or below touch gas peddle to hard and lights the back tires up old 5.3 i had would not spin the tires on ice

  • @amorris1970
    @amorris1970 18 дней назад +1

    A 4 cylinder engine gets worse mpg then the old 3.6L WTF? Looks like GM is going backwards.

    • @Holden-McGroin
      @Holden-McGroin 25 минут назад

      It’s not about efficiency, it’s about emissions compliance.

  • @brianmaloney5430
    @brianmaloney5430 2 месяца назад

    Lol

  • @waynemangiardi734
    @waynemangiardi734 Месяц назад +1

    IT'S JUNK! NOT a good ENGINE!!!

    • @nedmorales1313
      @nedmorales1313 Месяц назад +1

      When did you purchase yours and what made you come up with? It’s junk. The reason I ask is because I’m actually thinking of buying one so I would love your insight on why you think it’s junk.

    • @TheJines123
      @TheJines123 Месяц назад +4

      It's not that bad. My shop works on a company fleet set of these. They are great

    • @nedmorales1313
      @nedmorales1313 Месяц назад +1

      @@TheJines123 have you found anything that would constitute a red flag at all?

    • @nedmorales1313
      @nedmorales1313 Месяц назад

      @ especially in regards to the fuel injectors being that they’re direct injection

    • @TheJines123
      @TheJines123 Месяц назад +5

      @nedmorales1313 honestly if you buy one make sure it's a 24 and up. The 23 has a plastic pan and are prone to leak. Run very good oil and change it between 4k-5k. If you don't they like to eat the cam phasers. Other than that they have been solid for my client. He has 7 with 200k miles on all of them. We also service a CSX scout truck with a. 2.7 and it's worked everyday all day and has almost 16,000 hours of running time. Not one problem out of it. It's a high tech Inline 4. They have a pretty trick set of cams in them. That's the main reason to keep the oil changed sooner. These engines have billet cams and a full steel forged rotating assembly. They are built to work. They have a longer stroke than a duramax diesel and great low end power. after seeing my clients vehicles i bought a 2024 canyon AT4X AEV and looooove it. GM is killing it with the midsize game right now.