Have you seen a difference between any of these Raw formats? 🤔 🛑Correction: Shooting in Lossless Comp also only gives you about 6fps (in any size L, M, S). Only shooting in Compressed are you able to get about 10fps.
You have to be able to pull shadows and drop highlights in images to see a difference. When the subject is in shadow, when you are using spot metering to just keep sun rays hitting the eye of the subject, creative scenarios. You have to test in high contrast settings or in scenarios like in Wildlife and such. Perfectly exposed photos in balanced situations won't show any difference.
Yes you're correct. I did try some tests after the fact in severely underposed conditions, pulled back the exposure in post and the differences were minimal to be honest. But at the end of the day one can make the decision and their own test based on their shooting scenarios.
I shoot lossless (M) compress raw it made my photos 14mp. Then i switch back to uncompress it came back to 33mp. Then I researched for a tutorial video. Now I know why. Thank you for the video. Now I know the difference (s) (m) (L). Thank you.
great video. I shoot in uncompressed raw as a wedding photographer. I change to compressed for the confetti shot. I find its the only time I need that amount of burst shooting.
Did you check to see which formats include a high resolution embedded JPEG for previews? I noticed uncompressed raw doesnt' include that..but compressed raw does. I didnt check if the lossless ones include a high resolution jpeg
Not exactly on the a7iv. It's only 12bit in comp raw in continuous shooting. Refer to this from Sony www.sony.com/electronics/support/articles/00229990
@@strippedlistAgreed. With Sony a7iii continuous af resulted in 12bit. With Sony a7iv you can maintain 14bit if you use compressed lossless raw even with continuous af but FPS drops from 10 to about 6 images a second.
Have you seen a difference between any of these Raw formats? 🤔
🛑Correction: Shooting in Lossless Comp also only gives you about 6fps (in any size L, M, S). Only shooting in Compressed are you able to get about 10fps.
Do you have problems with the overheating on video or in general? If not, what’s the cities you use for it?
You have to be able to pull shadows and drop highlights in images to see a difference. When the subject is in shadow, when you are using spot metering to just keep sun rays hitting the eye of the subject, creative scenarios. You have to test in high contrast settings or in scenarios like in Wildlife and such. Perfectly exposed photos in balanced situations won't show any difference.
Yes you're correct. I did try some tests after the fact in severely underposed conditions, pulled back the exposure in post and the differences were minimal to be honest. But at the end of the day one can make the decision and their own test based on their shooting scenarios.
I shoot lossless (M) compress raw it made my photos 14mp. Then i switch back to uncompress it came back to 33mp. Then I researched for a tutorial video. Now I know why. Thank you for the video. Now I know the difference (s) (m) (L). Thank you.
great video. I shoot in uncompressed raw as a wedding photographer. I change to compressed for the confetti shot. I find its the only time I need that amount of burst shooting.
Nice! Is that the reception entrance?
Thanks much for clarifying that one does not have to shoot everything in uncompressed RAW. Just saved some memory (and disk) space.
Saves quite a bit of space! Thanks for watching!
Last time I checked only compressed raw gives you 10 fps. All other raw is 6fps unless this was updated in the newest firmware.
Yes you're correct! I tried L M and S in lossless Comp and still only get about 6fps. Thanks!
that's right
Lossless compressed - by definition can't be different. The file has to be identical after lightroom uncompresses it. At least for L.
Yeah in theory they should be the same
Mind you that compressed M and S will have big issues in Lightroom when it comes to AI denoising and such. It is not available for those formats.
Good to know!
Did you check to see which formats include a high resolution embedded JPEG for previews?
I noticed uncompressed raw doesnt' include that..but compressed raw does. I didnt check if the lossless ones include a high resolution jpeg
For the A7V i just want 15 -20 Fps - compressed / 40MPX 😂 - i always shoot in compressed raw + battery grip / CFType A
why on does lightroom take?
How do you even open Sony loseless compressed m? I can't import it into my Lightroom or view the image in anyway
Do you have the latest version of Lightroom?
I have important question, new update a7iv 1.11 can improve overheating problem?
I don't think so. Sony doesn't mention it corrects it. It only mentions it improves shutter stability and a rotation issue
@@MarioSoMedia a7siii or a7riv have any overheating problem In video?
@@MarioSoMedia are you agree to update a7iv to 1.10 or 1.11?
@@mahdisadeghi1304 i never have any oberheating issue with my sony a7iv, i use for video
@@BudayaUrangSunda hi. are you update your fram work to 1.11?
Great video, thanks!
Thanks for watching!
thank you for this 👍
You're welcome!
12 bit compressed, 14 bit the others
Not exactly on the a7iv.
It's only 12bit in comp raw in continuous shooting. Refer to this from Sony www.sony.com/electronics/support/articles/00229990
@@MarioSoMedia the compressed yeas, the lossless is not
@@strippedlistAgreed. With Sony a7iii continuous af resulted in 12bit. With Sony a7iv you can maintain 14bit if you use compressed lossless raw even with continuous af but FPS drops from 10 to about 6 images a second.
thanks!