Law in a Time of Crisis - Jonathan Sumption in Conversation - BridLit 2021

Поделиться
HTML-код

Комментарии • 20

  • @traceyomalley3797
    @traceyomalley3797 2 года назад +9

    Cannot wait to read this I think he has always seen the bigger picture authoritarian regimes use fear thankyou Lord Sumption always enlightened by listening to you 🙏we live in hope

  • @gayledavidson3788
    @gayledavidson3788 Год назад

    Thank you.

  • @drilldrulus1235
    @drilldrulus1235 2 года назад +6

    Thomas Hobbs was a very instructive thinker on this subject of absolute goverment. And his argument was basiccaly very simple but it took an entire book Levithan to explain it Hobbs said the implicit bargain the people makes with the state it that the state gives them absolute safety in return they have to abounden all their freedoms and right for ever. The last two years be have been ruled by this principle. That was Hobbs view I hope all in here view this conclution as repellent.

  • @cecilefox9136
    @cecilefox9136 2 года назад +3

    I agree with Lord Sumption on the lockdowns.

  • @jameshumfry1256
    @jameshumfry1256 2 года назад +3

    I greatly admire this gentleman. Wonderful thinker and speaker.

  • @ciaranoregan3710
    @ciaranoregan3710 Год назад +2

    A voice of careful reason throughout the pandemic. Great chat.

  • @tedbo1819
    @tedbo1819 2 года назад +1

    Is this the second edition? If so, is it substantially different to the first?

  • @lennycarlson1178
    @lennycarlson1178 2 года назад

    who were the judges he declined to name that recently left the bench?

  • @Johnconno
    @Johnconno Год назад

    Lawlessness in a Time of Crisis.
    Fixed.

  • @Frohicky1
    @Frohicky1 2 года назад +3

    But Sumption isn't shouting his opinions in a loud regional accent. He can't possible be right!

  • @drtreg
    @drtreg 2 года назад +1

    How wrong he was about the EU.

  • @legalmonkey
    @legalmonkey 2 года назад

    45:14 Coronavirus Act

  • @clem1300
    @clem1300 2 года назад

    Has an illiberal democracy (48:35) ever existed? Is there one? The very idea seems an affront to democracy, unless one is thinking of the tyranny of the majority. But surely one would not consider the latter a democracy worthy of the name. And one where the rule of law governs? In all probability what one finds there is rule by law.

  • @h.r7050
    @h.r7050 2 года назад

    Will you, Sumption, return the money Abramovich paid you, or you did not know where the money came from?

  • @lizgichora6472
    @lizgichora6472 Год назад +2

    Thank you.

  • @drilldrulus1235
    @drilldrulus1235 2 года назад +2

    Thomas Hobbs was a very instructive thinker on this subject of absolute goverment. And his argument was basiccaly very simple but it took a complete book Levithan to explain it Hobbs said the implicit bargain the people makes with the state it that the state gives them absolute safety in return they have to abounden all their freedoms and right for ever. The last two years be have been ruled by this principle. That was Hobbs view I hope all in here view this conclution as repellent

  • @drilldrulus1235
    @drilldrulus1235 2 года назад +2

    Thomas Hobbs was a very instructive thinker on this subject of absolute goverment. And his argument was basiccaly very simple but it took a complete book Levithan to explain it Hobbs said the implicit bargain the people makes with the state it that the state gives them absolute safety in return they have to abounden all their freedoms and right for ever. The last two years be have been ruled by this principle. That was Hobbs view I hope all in here view this conclution as repellent