Well I'm from America and here is how BAD it has become since Rowan said that. 1. There are banks cancelling credit cards and accounts if you happen to say something racy or "offensive" on your Twitter or Facebook. 2. Now (in the US at least) an employer can peek at your FB or Twitter and make job considerations based on that. 3. Now based on your credit score and some stupid "social score" you can now be denied a home loan, insurance, or all of the above. This bad enough for you? It's like the UK and the US are seeing which country can fall off the cliff faster. I'm surprised that YT still allows this video. They haven't labeled it "hatespeech" or "wrong think" .
@@deathstrike lmao. You sensitive fucking people. You have the right to say and do whatever you want but that does not exempt you from the consequences of doing so. Also, I'm going to need a source on the cancelled credit cards and the home loans. As an American who takes free speech very seriously, it seems I would have heard about either of those already. As a side note, people seem to be having a very difficult time acknowledging the difference between consequences of their actions and the products of their victim complexes. One mustn't forget that businesses are free to associate with who they so choose and must not be obligated to do business with people they chose not to (barring protected classes). None of what you listed is at all relevant to Rowan was talking about. You simply saw an excuse to parrot your victim hood mantra.
@@F.o.s.t.e.r. yes but businesses should not have the right to discriminate who they employ if that person is fit & proper for the job. Today its discrimination of views and values tomorrow its discrimination of race and we're back to the 1960s.
@@aidy6000 your fear tactic won't work. Simply using a slippery slope fallacy, even when based on a false premise, does not make your point any less invalid. You sound like you ripped that hot take right from Carlson's white power hour. First off, no company can be obligated to hire somebody just because they're competent. Many other factors go into play during the hiring process. Among those are brand, culture, and character. If you do not fit the brand, if you cannot mix with the culture, and if you have poor character, it does not matter how good you are at the job. And, frankly, bigotry and anti-intellectualism are not qualities of people with good character, are not supported by the vast majority of successful brands, and do not mix with any culture that does not also think incest is acceptable. Furthermore, values and views have been the leading discriminatory factor for hiring since before the middle class existed. If you do not like this, you are more than welcome to leave this mixed economic country and find a place that does not care about it's citizens. I hear Russia and China are always looking for hard workers. On a separate and entirely unrelated note. There's a thing in societies called mores. They are not laws, per say, however they are concepts and ideals that a collective society agreed to adhere to. This is a standard part of a functional society. Instead of throwing temper tantrums because people won't bend to your will. How about acknowledging that what you have to offer is of no value and that's why people don't want you working for them, or near them.
Being kind and humble is so overrated nowadays. Why not just be uncivilized and kill each other? Let's see how you can handle being "OFFENSIVE" to a guy 10 times bigger than you. FYI, get an appointment to a dentist a day before
@xrag I am familiar with truth tables, mathematics and the logic you speak of. At the beginning of this comment you sounded like you might be about to make a smart point, but then you mentioned "physical constants" which implies you think you need an education in the physical sciences to have reasoned debate. This is simply not true. Further, while speech can be empty sounds, it is always reasonable to assume the person you are speaking to is trying to make some point, however convoluted the manner in which they go about it. To not assume such is the kind of arrogance that leads to thinking you have all the answers and need not receive input from anyone. Finally I have no idea what you mean by "this is a nonsense", since the person merely asked if your first comment was an argument against free speech.
Fear is a powerful tool, used by cowards full of hateful intolerance, which in itself, is a result of their own fear. Question everything ! But put your bloody mask on first....
@@vethokhool960 I am the only one who can decide whether I will take offense or be insulted by your words😉. In essence, no. I will not let anyone get that thrill, lol.
The king of comedy came down from his throne to be the voice of the vulnerable ones. This is greatness. He pointed out the problem and gave a sounded solution! Very well articulated speech!❤ Thank you Your Highness.
Just because someone fears their words doesn't make the man right. It only proves that his words are dangerous for them, regardless of being the truth, lies or in between.
@@luisavanco5824 And was using the IRS to go after conservative groups to shut them down but he got caught. He also said he was "free of scandals". I have very little respect for Obama if any. He pretty much started the woke movement, kick started socialism, racial tension by saying Trevon Martin was the son he never had, social justice warriors, and changed his conservative views on marriage and illegal aliens. Ever since 2010 the U.S. has been very divided politically and it is even worse today because the media keeps creating more division. Trump tried to end the PC movement and had some success. God help us be normal again.
this is like a 14 year olds perspective though. if a word is bad just keep saying it until it loses it's effect which doesn't work out in reality because the world doesn't revolve around your speech. people find it really hard to put themselves in other peoples shoes. it's sad great people can be so self unaware
@@tntstorms7969 I think Obama was worse than that, he took a study that had no scientific basis, a study that was highly criticised when peer reviewed and was tweaked to try to show an agenda that the so called psychologists wanted to follow and made it out to be fact. This study was the unconscious bias study evolving into what we know as the IAT tests. Just do some research to see how abhorrent this is.
Rowan Atkinson really is a national treasure. Not only did he give us hours of laughs but he's willing to stand up for people who can't defend themselves.
I still consider this one of the greatest speeches in modern times and increasingly valid as the years go by. It's such a shame it wasn't made in Parliament.
It's as if all the people in the world who were always first "out" in dodge ball got together, read copies of "Rules For Radicals", and declared "NOW WE GET OUR REVENGE!!!". It's irrational, it's destructive, it's vengeful, and it's sociopathic at best -- psychopathic at worst.
There is a term for that in socialpsychology called Mindguards. They filter what the group gets to know and keeps people ignorant so they can control them into hating who they want.
just FYI, George Orwell was a libertarian socialist and 1984 was as much of a critique of rampant authoritarian capitalism as it was a critique of rampant authoritarian communism
Authoritarianism in all forms is wrong. Orwell can be right about the problem but wrong about the solution as so many have been before and since. The extreme of every political belief is terrible: whether it is Democracy, Capitalism, Communism, Socialism, Republicanism, Fascism, Libertarianism, Imperialism... the list goes on, but each pushed to the extreme is evil (some more than others). The best we've got so far is the western form of freedom based in Constitutional Republics/ Democracies. Freedom of Speech (& expression) are fundamental to the continuation of true progress.
Rowan Atkinson, I have watched your movies for years and had no idea for what you stood for till now. I am now a huge fan of yours and respect you even more. God bless you sir.
Rowan is just saying what the vast majority of people think. Political correctness is gone completely out of hand. Like he said he used to make comedy sketches of this stuff damn good ones I might add they had everyone in stitches laughting. Who'd have thought that they'd become the excepted society values I.e you can't criticise someone because their Irish for example well I'm Irish and I'll take constructive criticism from anyone, preventing people from stopping or condemning wrong doing just because of a person's race sexuality or gender does far more harm than good.
@@derschwarzgeist I think they do, but any resistance could cost them their career, freinds (who might secretly agree with him/her, but can't say so for the same reasons), relationship/kids or - if this culture reaches it's natural destination - their life.
Yup and I just think these fact checkers became karen's. Fact checkers with feelings. One persons lies, is another persons reality. ruclips.net/video/ACVULnFtEKc/видео.html
@Pasha Staravoitau That depends on the definition. The US has a definition where hate speech and call to genocide is allowed, which on the other hand silences the victims of the hate speech. So I guess the lesson from that example is: Free speech is not only the right to say what it on your mind, but the right of others to critize your view with no other threat than being wrong. So I agree with you, but remember, that not everyone has understood this difference.
@@57thorns Hate speech is allowed, yes. Not a call to genocide. I don't know where you came up with the idea that people in the U.S. can call for the death of others. It just isn't true.
@@kaibarrera9911 An interesting and quite rational look at the situation. The media only became this way because we allowed it to. Although, I do have to say, I believe the responsibility of the media is to the facts and the truth first, and views and profit second.
Edmund To be fair, Mr. Bean was the most widespread work of Rowan’s, because of his humorous acts without uttering a word. No language barrier to hold him.
I agree and think Rowan has made some very valid points but my first question to Rowan and supporters of this is, is there ever a free speech 'line' that shouldn't be crossed and if someone does cross this line then surely it must be right that consequences should follow ie being arrested? Examples of this line might be making monkey chants at black people or being verbally sexually explicit to a child. After all these examples are 'only words'. Hell, with enough time and the protection of unlimited free speech then you could almost certainly verbally bully any child into committing suicide if you really wanted to but surely someone who does this shouldn't be free and protected should they? For me it's not 'everyone must have free speech all the time on anything' as I don't think that works either. So my follow up questions if you supports are saying of course there's a line where free speech should become 'illegal' then: Where is that line? Who should decide where that line is drawn? And who should enforce the censoring of free speech so that the people whom cross this line are brought to justice?
@@Speak_Out_and_Remove_All_Doubt I think you gravely misunderstand how laws work. Those are specific scenarios scenarios with special provisions dealing with them. Free speech is not an inviolable principle, nonsense like section 5 or no, and no one's advocating it be made one. You don't need carte blanche to send a van of troopers to haul someone off for questioning, and later - court, over any comment that could possibly be construed as being insulting to some undefined other. It's merely the default. That is, if it doesn't break any specific law - and there is no lack of laws dealing with harassment or the other things you mention - it should be fine. And if it isn't, you make a new law for that scenario. It doesn't supersede anything, so your talk about some hypothetical defense of it being "just words", or a need to draw a line, just does not make any sense. Every law is a line. If you harass someone using "just words", you're going to get charged for harassment. If you threaten someone using "just words", you're going to be charged for issuing threats. If you blackmail someone using "just words", you're going to be charged with blackmail. You don't need nebulous, wide-sweeping laws like section 5 that criminalize any statement that could possibly be considered insulting to anyone for that. It's a non-factor. Section 5 or no, those laws still stand. The "free speech" you seem to be talking about does not exist and does not have proponents, at least not here. Nothing you said has anything to do with section 5 or anything else in Rowan Atkinson's speech. You simply do not know what you're talking about. Which, now that I look around, should've been obvious seeing as you're spamming this comment in every thread. You're clearly not here for the content. You're here to earn points for your "side". Grow up. Get a real hobby. Spamming youtube comments isn't going to affect any change. Get off your ass and leave your room if you want to fancy yourself an activist.
@@wahideheydari4551 irrespective of whether or not it's original, one cannot deny the truth it has, especially in this generation. And the world has 7 billion people, you will DEFINITELY see this again 10 times by the next week👍
@@wahideheydari4551 Not really sure if anyone else have said this. Just commented what I feel is the truth. Also had a similar comment to a Dave Chappelle video
I feel its always been that way, look at the old story of how George carlin was arrested with another comedian, they let George go because he was pretty much a part of the Hollywood machine, not sure on the exact reason, but he realized this and changed for the better, him along with many other comedians of the time always preached about freedom and the dangers of censoring un popular speech.
Very true. Although last year Ukraine voted a comedian as their President and he swifty became "one of them". Although I think he didn't have much choice with Putin breathing down his neck. I don't think we will ever truly understand the pressure of a senior political role and how impossible it is to keep everyone happy.
"None of the above", or NOTA for short, also known as "against all" or a "scratch" vote, is a ballot option in some jurisdictions or organizations, designed to allow the voter to indicate disapproval of the candidates in a voting system. Wikipedia
That's because he has greatly exercised his right to free speech. People who often express themselves get better at it, while those who repressed their thoughts tend to be less articulate. That's because when people don't express they tend to only dwell in insolated thoughts, thoughts that might not even be their own. When your thoughts go unchallenged, you don't see both the positive and negative.
It’s a bit of a weird statement to make, this, because, regardless of how people feel about the posh fella talking about preserving free speech, he is posh and has never had any right to free speech to begin with. Pointless calling anyone “a man of the people” when the people already have free speech. It’s the one thing we get that the posh people can’t have.
Anyone else blown away by the fact that an actor possibly most known for a role in which the character doesn't speak has to be a champion for free speech..
The fact that he played the main characters in both shows how talented a comedian he is. One is very wordy and known for its word play, the other is pure physical comedy.
"None of the above", or NOTA for short, also known as "against all" or a "scratch" vote, is a ballot option in some jurisdictions or organizations, designed to allow the voter to indicate disapproval of the candidates in a voting system. Wikipedia
It saddens me that my parents would be lost by the eloquency and lose sight of the message. They would go "What does that mean?" and go about their business not giving a hoot about free speech being restricted.
@@Jacob-qr8pl this , this exactly, my parents do the same and I'm just sitting there like ,"wtf? How can you just abandon a thought in the middle if you don't understand the vocabulary, just look it up in the dictionary or something "
@deviantrebel well if people actually took the time to go through Rushdie's books like SHAME or Satanic verses, perhaps the outrage industry would have been a thing of the past.
the uk and eu are run by communists, that's the problem. if everything is getting worse and more communists have gotten into government then perhaps there may be a slight chance that there's a correlation 👨🏫🤡
Ironic that the little skit he did years ago was becoming a reality today, but that's definitely a speech worth listening to and much needed these days. Well said Rowan, beautifully spoken. 👏
When the young people become older people their young children will kill them for their views. That's the only positive I can find in this sad part of the human race. What goes around comes around!!!
@@simongill4715 That's also true, but this was a speech to bring light to the problem of censorship against free speech. Although the Murdoch empire also plays a big part in that, it's far from the whole problem
@@mrnulliustestikleezeeastee7365 But half of the time people are offended by something that was never intended to be unpleasant in any way. A culture of "offended because someone said anything at all" has developed. And that culture includes getting angry because someone has given you constructive criticism.
@@R_Caine I think you're right, Anthony Hopkins said himself during an interview that most actors don't really now how the world really works, he also said that he is willing to take part into intesresting discussions but that he would surely not contribute as much as an expert would. Self-aware and humble actors are so rare nowadays.
Insults and hate speech are NOT the same, and should NOT be treated as such. When you call someone an "ignorant sh*thead" and tell them they should "read a book," you are insulting them. When you call someone "a blight on society" and tell them they should "f*ck off and die," that is no mere insult, and to treat it as "just" an insult is to enable far worse. Yes, we should be tolerant of insults. But there are limits.
Easy. In this talk he's talking from a position of power without recognizing how intolerance works if you're not a middle aged upper class white male. What he's advocating *would not affect him*.
@@samiraperi467 He literally said that he knows he will barely or even at all be affected by these laws, and he knows that. But he's advocating for reforming a shitty law that apparently allows you to be arrested for saying something going against social standard. How the Hell is that racist?
The audience were laughing as Mr. Atkinson was referencing three examples, then notice no one was laughing as he continued his powerful message. This is not Mr. Bean, but a man of knowledge who owns respect.
Imagine if this was a Mr Bean episode where he's somehow landed on stage and is terribly timid with the situation of course, but then he whips this speech out. The episode title could be 'Mr Beans First Words'
“He who takes offense when offense was not intended is a fool, yet he who takes offense when offense is intended is an even greater fool for he has succumbed to the will of his adversary.” -Brigham Young
Or as my late father put it, "It's not what they call you, it's what you answer to." Someone can only make you feel poorly with speech alone if you value their opinion. In being offended, one surrenders power to the offender. The only people who could possibly offend me are people I love, and only then if what they are saying is true. If what they say is not true, then it has no weight, and even if what they say is true, I probably already know it, so the saying of it brings me no discomfort.
Thank you Rowan. What utter common sense, beautifully and articulately voiced. Please let's all get to grips with getting rid of the madness of intolerance to trivial things, and let's put it into history.
Depends on how you are disagreeing. By legal attack, by crossing the person out of the right to disagree, or by braking into his home and arrest him! They all are happening now a days as referring to covid19 negative opinions.
@@ΑικατερίνηΔήμα-σ4γ only problem is that's not actually happening. The only ones being arrested are shit-stirring conspiracy theorists, who can't be bothered with a real job so they resort to manipulating vulnerable and gullible people for a living. They don't have an opinion to begin with, they have an agenda. They're not being silenced, they're being dealt with.
Many hard left people think they are centrists. So to argue with them is to be extreme right in their biased point of view. This is why they've been attacking even the left of center and crapping on the legacy of greats such as MLK. Now the hard right is crazy too but at least they have the decency to know they are hard right.
@@newworldorderguy4040 The problem with your glib and facile comment is who gets to determine what speech "needs to be dealt with" - as if some wise and benevolent agency was there to pass judgement on what speech was worthy and what was not. What needs limitation is governments that feel they have the responsibility to determine what is acceptable and what isn't. The mass of people are better at that than any "enlightened" expert.
@@larryphilby4918 do you need someone to explicitly point out who is talking bullshit? Have you never noticed that they all follow the same patterns, and they have done since the first ever cult was formed? I'm going to ignore your "glib and facile" part and assume that's just you exercising your right to free speech, rather than passing sound judgement.
Can't believe it, this was 8 years ago. We certainly haven't gone in the direction he suggested we should. It's getting really bad, so bad in fact, that I have started to avoid speaking to certain people I deem as overly sensitive.
Well most American celebrities didn't go to and graduate from Oxford with a degree in a STEM field. I believe Mr Atkinson studied electrical engineering.
@@2013branth With some strong amount of luck, and after a strenuous search, I believe you might actually be able to find an American celebrity that at best, approved all tests involving "Play-Doh 101" and "Glue Usage 101 and 102" back in Kindergarten. Those would be the cultivated kind, that some times rise to prominence, end up having their own talk shows, etc. It's quite curious that strongly educated, genious-level celebrities like "The Offspring" singer Dexter Holland, who holds a Ph,D, in Mollecular Biology, and happens to be a Virologist as well, are often quiet and dedicated to their job.
Many celebrities are, but they're the ones despised and suppressed by their fellow Hollywood neighbors and the media. They don't get a voice because they're not towing the party line.
@@hansvonmannschaft9062 I suppose the higher you climb up the totem pole, the more professional you become, and the more you keep your private life separate from your work life. That being said, intelligence does not mean you're immune from becoming an ideologue. After all, the inner circle of Nazis leadership had genius-level IQs.
How bout Morgan Freeman's interview where he disregarded the black history month as bullshit, said black history is American history and called for people to stop caring about race if they want to end racism?
In United States, we have a Bill of rights which is a part and parcel of the constitution. Amongst which, the 1st Amendment categorically says that 'Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech or freedom of the press'.
Well, he does say "We all have to take responsibility for what we say.", which isn't really free speech, it's technically just advocating for censorship on both sides to maintain status quo rather than censoring just one group. Or at least that's the sort of language a politician would use to push for more censorship, not less. Now you can give him benefit of the doubt if you like, maybe it was just worded poorly. However if you hear a politician repeat those words though, you should get worried as every time you can interpret politician's language as being double-talk, it usually is.
@@jeanclaudejunior Stupid opinions are fixed with more speech, not less speech. Empirical evidence as well as open and transparent discourse is best because then stupid opinions are revealed for what they are. If you enshrine people with academic titles and high positions in social hierarchy to a status of priesthood and silence opposing points of view, you aren't going to convince anyone on your facts, all you are convincing them of is that you are willing to use force to shut them up when they disagree with you, making them natural allies with everyone else you have censored thus far.
@@strongback6550 But i insist that climate change denial, Hate Speech, Anti-Semitism and Unclean conspiracy Theories are to be declared as a disease to free speech and incompatible with it
So does that mean you might entertain the idea that the "hate speech censorship" ting has been dramatized and exaggerated by a bunch of bored Westerners who haven't (really) been affected (too much) by : a) what they're actually talking about; b) the worse extreme of what they're talking about ???
That is because idiotic ideas can be infectious and impervious to facts or reasoned debate: eg flat-earthers. I was evangelical about the internet in the early 90's, thinking it would lead to global enlightenment, instead we had Trump and his tweets. I don't think the answer is as simple as we once thought .
People do but it's those with power who abuse it and make others scared. Police have too much grey area to arrest someone for nothing. As Rowan talks about the act (basically) allowing police to arrest just because someone might be offended.
When Rowan Atkinson feels like a giant in front of puny politics and media, even long ago when i saw him in old top gear i thought, "that guy is awesome".
8 years after these words were spoken, they ring truer than ever. Here in Canada, we have become so overly sensitive to unharmful words and actions, it's not even funny. Thank you Rowan Atkinson. This video should be viewed and heard by our politicians, media and police forces.
Harm is measured by laws against libel, slander, and defamation, as well as applicable anti racism laws. What is Canada's equivalent of the Constitution of the united states?
Our politicians know exactly what they're doing. Trudeau is China's puppet. They've been bribing him. Look at his ethics violations. It's a Maoist takeover. Our elites want access to China's giant market, and that means playing by Communist China's rules, which are evil. That's why they all hate President Trump. He's defending America and the world from Communist Chinese takeover. Our one advantage we have is Communists are very stupid, and over the years, they've been exposing themselves. Watch Crossroads with Joshua Phillipp or China Uncensored here on RUclips to follow the developments in this new Cold War with China. We will prevail! Trump 2020!
@@StopFear It's the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. But it's nowhere as good as the American constitution when it comes to protecting peoples liberty. It includes the vague "right to equality", which basically means it can't stop Socialism and Communism. The ideology we're up against is older than many people realize.
Bob Domler Remember if the government gives you something ( charter of freedoms and rights) it can take it away. Rights are inalienable and “ God” given. This is one reason the UK doesn’t have a codified charter of rights, and neither should it have. In the case of Canada it is being seduced into a degree of Socialism it will regret. Trudeau et al have a dangerous socio political agenda which will further cause a greater degree of division which could result in the separation of a once rich and thriving nation. I have come to the conclusion after the US it is the world’s richest third world nation because of its acceptance of political corruption, plummeting standard of living, abject poverty of its indigenous people, and pliable police force.
@@jonnyboy2128 One thing you have to understand about Canada's indigenous people is the government deals with the chiefs, and of course the chiefs are all corrupt. They take the government's money, keep it for themselves, while their tribes live in squalor. So it's not necessarily the governments fault. It's the chiefs themselves that are corrupt. It's a mess!
@@mattardyantoriyadi strangely enough the sound of arrogant voices putting forward their " penny worth" is worse than the noise of people protesting...hmmm is it the opposed arguing vs protesters togetherness?
@@warmhum5918 That is because to be politically Right Wing, you are likely nationalistic, Pro upkeep of old traditions and values. Also in some cases racist towards other minority groups. Modern Political Leftists aren't racist. Political leftists are also pro freedom and diverse, which puts them at the front line of civilization's progressive evolution. To make sure we don't get sent back in time to bashing rocks together, extreme racism must be moderated in order to stop fascism from returning from the grave. It's as simple as that. Don't like it? Sorry, nothing i can do for you about that. If you are secretly racist, that is your problem, not mine.
@@madrockon7357 wall of text. No right people are cancelling anyone. We make up about a fifth of the media sources. You are so totally wrong its hilarious.
People can't help laughing when Rowan Atkinson speaks because he is naturally and famously funny but on this occasion, in this video, he is deadly serious and concerned about our civil liberties when it comes to our freedom of speech! Well said Rowan!!
It seemed to me he meant the list of ludicrous things to be slightly humorous or at least knew people would laugh. And also the reasons for the black man being arrested. Arrested for walking all over the place? funny.
Some was intended to be humorous, but not all, yet people laughed where no laughing was justified. Some people do the same when hearing John Cleese speaking about serious matters.
Then you remember thay those in charge don't listen to we'll reasoned arguments well made, they listen to money and they listen to ranting hate mobs. Everything else can be ignored.
I agree, it does make one wonder what agenda youtube and google have with their algorithms.. Suppress and reveal as required.. By whom or what we will never know, unless one wishes to pay large sums of cash for such large companies to bend in one's favour.
funny that yt recommends a video pointing out their censorism^^ I would have expected them to delete this video because "community guidelines" or terrorism or whatever.
@@daic7274 What if the algorithm's only purpose is to get you to watch more videos and ads!? And the best way its worked out to do that is to manipulate your emotions, and create conflict and emergency.
@RedDemoon it's pointing out the fact that people nowadays are so sensitive that they will contact the police and ask them to make an arrest on somebody because of what they said online, and the police respond to this call and make the arrest, not because someone *has* caused offence, but because they *might* cause offence. Police in the UK have becoming increasingly more responsive to these kinds of calls, and have started to bend more to the will of the "politically correct". It's at a point where police won't arrest people of colour or Muslims, because they're scared that they'll be called racists/islamophobes, which could lead to a mob demanding they be arrested or shut down.
Not sure if it was a verified article about IQ testing, but it stated he had a very high score, like 170--180 region. That would make him smarter than any parliament member.
The biggest problem with the usage of "political correctness" on the internet is that free speech goes both ways. If you express values that goes against what is socially regarded as accepted, (being racist, nazi, homophobe etc. things that goes against established human rights). People will argue against you, due to moral standpoints. The person using "political correctness" as a slur is generally using it as a cheap defense mechanism in arguments since they want to silence the other party, bullying them to think that they somehow aren't "free thinkers". And THIS is where things go wrong in my opinion. In a world of free speech, take the argument instead. that's what it is all about. And I will always argue against people that have, in my opinion, bad moral standards. And I except people to do the same against me.
@@PixelShade Personally im sick of it all, sick of being told what I can and cant say, can or cant do, what opions im allowed to have etc - its ridiculous! They are taking away our humanity.
"Sure, humor can hurt, even alienate. But the risk is better than the alternative: a steady diet of innocuous, childproof, flavorless mush. Demand to be challenged, to be offended, to be treated like thinking, reasoning adults. And raise your children to be the same. Don't let a comedian, a network, a congressional committee, or an evil genius take away your freedom to laugh at whatever you want." -Duckman
Atkinson isn't just talking about humour. He's talking about the right of others to insult and hate others, usually minority groups. Is there such a thing as inciteful hate speech? Just last year an Australian man murdered 51 New Zealanders and then wanted Free Speech to spread his ideals. Should he have freedom of speech? I think not, as did our Government.
@@Albert_Br if there's a reason his ideas become popular and spread, its because there's a deeper issue which is being ignored, not because he's an entertaining writer. Censoring only inflames the topic. That's what happens when you suppress the viewpoint of a worthy opponent. Reacting to the moral indignation of hearing a clashing viewpoint to that of your own through the force of law, is always the gateway which allows a resolvable problem to transform to war.
@@ron4520 this. Why would anyone want or even allow the government to put in place and enforce these rules? Can you imagine if a real dictator got into power? This dictator has all these rules in place that don't allow anyone to speak out against the gov. Then we get something similar to what's happening in China right now as we speak. Where people are getting killed, their families threatened, arrested with life sentences. The slope is way too slippery. And you give enough power to those in charge and they'll run a damn mile with it. We're seeing it in the UK with Count Dankula, and others being arrested for what they've said online.
@@Albert_Br you can't pick and choose what is and isn't free speech. What happened in NZ had bugger all to do with free speech. And it's a shame you believe a government should control what you say.
just have to look at britain, australia and new zealand to see what's in store for the rest of the west if we keep letting commies into power by using our empathy against us to control us. It's sickening.
@@sinephase yep police have become very powerful since covid. It is becoming like pre WWI Germany what I studied at school in history is actually happening again.
As adults, we should have seen this coming a long time ago. Homestly, I blame myself, you and society as a whole. No offense We could have, should have stopped this before it happened.
*_"It's important that we're exposed to a wide spectrum of opinion, but what we have now is the digital equivalent of the medieval mob roaming the streets looking for someone to burn."_* -Rowan Atkinson
Is this "wide spectrum of opinion" only shared by a group of people or all races in the world? It is also extremely worrying that this "wide spectrum of free speech" is obviously become the breeding ground of extremism and opinions notoriously leaned towards to the two poles that never meet.
Education aside, he's always been a smart guy. Many slapstick comedians and clowns are wise, because they're humble and observing so they learn quickly.
We need people like Rowan Atkinson. Not because he's famous, although it might help, but because he is standing up for what is right! We need Free Speech! 👏🙂👍❤️
@@jmwoods190 Or learn that free speech was granted except they just fall back on section 43 now. Covers all bases? Child was playing football and that tackle was a little rough must be a perfect example to use section 43 eh constable savage?
The best comedians tend to be extremely smart & very tolerant of all society & embrace those perceived imperfections of law abiding society & see it instead as character. Through that, humour ensues.
Whats more dire is that this(politicians telling lies) is being displayed so openly that it gradually wore poeple down to the point of it being treated as 'the norm'.
Rowan Atkinson was always a person whose art I deeply admired, the razor sharp witty humour he delivered over the past half a century puts him in the pantheon of the world's most renown comedians. After this speach, he also became a hero.
It's been a month but looks like nobody mentioned this to you, you kind of misspelt an important word there. You might want to fix it so that you won't be embarrassed in the future.
"None of the above", or NOTA for short, also known as "against all" or a "scratch" vote, is a ballot option in some jurisdictions or organizations, designed to allow the voter to indicate disapproval of the candidates in a voting system. Wikipedia
@@robinwolstenholme6377 Does voting as NOTA have any impact? If there is a high % of NOTA votes will it stop the election process, or the formation of government. I don't see how the NOTA votes will ever matter.
Hard believe that our society has decayed to a point where words of common sense like this must be spoken out loud. And it is terrifying to see that this is 4 years old, and things only got worse.
Imagine getting to the point in our society where Mr. Bean is more articulate, and speaks more persuasively and with greater substance than the vast majority of politicians.
That this surprises you is... depressing. Those who are the most articulate and possessed of substance are rarely found in elected positions. Instead those positions are filled by those who are merely charismatic and persuasive in the absence of substance, like our outgoing President, Ronald Reagan, or Arnold Schwartzenegger.
Mr. Rowan Atkinson is perhaps the most articulate speaker of the English language today. But, I guess one could argue that his co-star from "Black Adder", Mr. Stephen Fry, is his equal in that regard. It is highly ironic that Americans know him as "Mr. Bean." I am thrilled by Mr. Atkinson's message here, but I am afraid it is too late. The pendulum is swinging towards social control and tyranny in Britain and in much of the world.
Mister Fry is indeed his arguable equal. If the two of them together were the spokesmen of a continued effort to reverse this authoritarian progression, they would be difficult to dismiss.
He said this in 2012. How much worse has it got since then.
very very much
Well I'm from America and here is how BAD it has become since Rowan said that.
1. There are banks cancelling credit cards and accounts if you happen to say something racy or "offensive" on your Twitter or Facebook.
2. Now (in the US at least) an employer can peek at your FB or Twitter and make job considerations based on that.
3. Now based on your credit score and some stupid "social score" you can now be denied a home loan, insurance, or all of the above.
This bad enough for you? It's like the UK and the US are seeing which country can fall off the cliff faster. I'm surprised that YT still allows this video. They haven't labeled it "hatespeech" or "wrong think" .
@@deathstrike lmao. You sensitive fucking people.
You have the right to say and do whatever you want but that does not exempt you from the consequences of doing so.
Also, I'm going to need a source on the cancelled credit cards and the home loans. As an American who takes free speech very seriously, it seems I would have heard about either of those already.
As a side note, people seem to be having a very difficult time acknowledging the difference between consequences of their actions and the products of their victim complexes. One mustn't forget that businesses are free to associate with who they so choose and must not be obligated to do business with people they chose not to (barring protected classes).
None of what you listed is at all relevant to Rowan was talking about. You simply saw an excuse to parrot your victim hood mantra.
@@F.o.s.t.e.r. yes but businesses should not have the right to discriminate who they employ if that person is fit & proper for the job. Today its discrimination of views and values tomorrow its discrimination of race and we're back to the 1960s.
@@aidy6000 your fear tactic won't work. Simply using a slippery slope fallacy, even when based on a false premise, does not make your point any less invalid. You sound like you ripped that hot take right from Carlson's white power hour.
First off, no company can be obligated to hire somebody just because they're competent. Many other factors go into play during the hiring process. Among those are brand, culture, and character. If you do not fit the brand, if you cannot mix with the culture, and if you have poor character, it does not matter how good you are at the job. And, frankly, bigotry and anti-intellectualism are not qualities of people with good character, are not supported by the vast majority of successful brands, and do not mix with any culture that does not also think incest is acceptable.
Furthermore, values and views have been the leading discriminatory factor for hiring since before the middle class existed. If you do not like this, you are more than welcome to leave this mixed economic country and find a place that does not care about it's citizens. I hear Russia and China are always looking for hard workers.
On a separate and entirely unrelated note. There's a thing in societies called mores. They are not laws, per say, however they are concepts and ideals that a collective society agreed to adhere to. This is a standard part of a functional society. Instead of throwing temper tantrums because people won't bend to your will. How about acknowledging that what you have to offer is of no value and that's why people don't want you working for them, or near them.
"If people can't control their own emotions, then they have to start trying to control other people's behavior." - John Cleese
Totally agree. Tell that to people who insult others in the name of freedom of speech.
Comedians aren't the bastion of wisdom.
@@Clay3613 who said they were? Only you.
@@marcello17s Those insulted are free to respond.
@@luckydave328 respond after the damage been done.
Now i like Rowan Atkinson more than ever.
I didn't know Atkinson was a fascist.. What a shame. #CancelAtkinson
@@thesorrow7499 Leftist why are you idiots?
@@sirato7058 I think he was joking considering he just put the hashtag up there
I am gonna buy all of his movies now!
Fellas don't be smoothbrains. Sorrow is very obviously joking
"The freedom to be inoffensive is no freedom at all". Brilliant words.
Being kind and humble is so overrated nowadays. Why not just be uncivilized and kill each other? Let's see how you can handle being "OFFENSIVE" to a guy 10 times bigger than you. FYI, get an appointment to a dentist a day before
@xrag Is that your argument against freedom of speech?
@xrag I am familiar with truth tables, mathematics and the logic you speak of. At the beginning of this comment you sounded like you might be about to make a smart point, but then you mentioned "physical constants" which implies you think you need an education in the physical sciences to have reasoned debate. This is simply not true. Further, while speech can be empty sounds, it is always reasonable to assume the person you are speaking to is trying to make some point, however convoluted the manner in which they go about it. To not assume such is the kind of arrogance that leads to thinking you have all the answers and need not receive input from anyone. Finally I have no idea what you mean by "this is a nonsense", since the person merely asked if your first comment was an argument against free speech.
@xrag You can’t say “blah blah blah” after the shit you tried pulling.
@@discretepulsarword waffle
He's stating the bleedin' obvious and yet it's rare to hear it these days.
Fear is a powerful tool, used by cowards full of hateful intolerance, which in itself, is a result of their own fear.
Question everything !
But put your bloody mask on first....
Cus no one can get angry at bean
@White-Van Helsing Idiot.
@White-Van Helsing Why do you think I'm silencing your freedom of speech?
@Andrew H SPOT ON MY FRIEND!!
so when is RUclips going to classify this as hate speech?
at curret rate of shit hitting the fan.....soon
Very soon..........
THIS IS HATE SPEECH
@@flochforster88 go burn down your local target
@@Butiguessilovememore Oh no I'm not a part of Burn Loot Murder
"Feel free to insult me"
If only people could realize just how important this sentiment is.
May I insult you?
Totally agree
@@vethokhool960 go ahead
Yes!! I love it!!
@@vethokhool960 I am the only one who can decide whether I will take offense or be insulted by your words😉. In essence, no. I will not let anyone get that thrill, lol.
The king of comedy came down from his throne to be the voice of the vulnerable ones. This is greatness. He pointed out the problem and gave a sounded solution!
Very well articulated speech!❤
Thank you Your Highness.
The vulnerable ones? Talking like some medieval peasant.
Highness 😂😂🤦
All hail the King...🎉
Lol he's not the king of comedy.
Didn't realise I could like him even more than I did.
Ikr
Can I join?
I with you on that
He's an extravagantly talented man, and immensely intelligent too boot.
Agreed.
"When you tear out a man's tongue, you are not proving him a liar, you're only telling the world that you fear what he might say." - George R R Martin
His name is Alex Jones and you can hear him on banned.video
@@jessicatevnan3137 You mean the controlled opposition shill? No thanks =)
@@jessicatevnan3137 Alex Jones is a clown and a toon. Come on. He's got no credibility left.
Just because someone fears their words doesn't make the man right. It only proves that his words are dangerous for them, regardless of being the truth, lies or in between.
@@magnussohlberg4939 >Right on just about everything
>"He has no credibility left"
Why, because people like you deemed it so?
"The strongest weapon against hateful speech is not repression, it is more speech."
Could not me more to the point.
Said by the man who has spent the last four years denigrating his successor.
@@luisavanco5824 And was using the IRS to go after conservative groups to shut them down but he got caught. He also said he was "free of scandals". I have very little respect for Obama if any. He pretty much started the woke movement, kick started socialism, racial tension by saying Trevon Martin was the son he never had, social justice warriors, and changed his conservative views on marriage and illegal aliens. Ever since 2010 the U.S. has been very divided politically and it is even worse today because the media keeps creating more division. Trump tried to end the PC movement and had some success. God help us be normal again.
this is like a 14 year olds perspective though. if a word is bad just keep saying it until it loses it's effect which doesn't work out in reality because the world doesn't revolve around your speech. people find it really hard to put themselves in other peoples shoes. it's sad great people can be so self unaware
@@tntstorms7969 you're insane
@@tntstorms7969 I think Obama was worse than that, he took a study that had no scientific basis, a study that was highly criticised when peer reviewed and was tweaked to try to show an agenda that the so called psychologists wanted to follow and made it out to be fact. This study was the unconscious bias study evolving into what we know as the IAT tests.
Just do some research to see how abhorrent this is.
One of the most sensible speeches I have heard in the last 15 years.
That's pretty funny considering this speech is ten years old. Clearly it didn't help much.
@@daniel4647 it definitely has not helped much :)
@@osraneslipy It's been more like a prophecy really. And as Ancient Greeks know, you can't fight destiny :(
In other words, the left need to STFU
No matter what context you are wrong on logical level. It doesn't matter if it's 3000 years old, YOU just HEARD it
He was my hero in childhood, and for this he is my hero in adulthood
Mine 2. And well said sir. ☺️
our*
So true
@@quanj *OUR*
Seems like you easily see hero's.
Who thought rowan Atkinson would make a good English P.M
Even Mr. Bean would make a better P.M. than the fool we have to suffer . Rowan Atkinson would make an EXCELLENT P.M. .
@@riklangham6739 much better than that old fool Corbyn.Not that he a had hope in hell of ever being elected.
I would have. he's well spoken and thinks. it's just the mister bean persona that makes him look a tit. I miss his old works like black adder.
Who wants to see Rowan Atkinson playing Jim Hacker in a "Yes, Prime Minister" reboot?? :)
@@LGranthamsHeir I would not say a reboot but you could do a new show with influences/inspiration from yes, prime minister.
loosely
Rowan Atkinson really is a national treasure. Not only did he give us hours of laughs but he's willing to stand up for people who can't defend themselves.
He’s different to most so called “comedians” in that regard, he actually understands that humour has
To be insulting to be actually funny
He's a real comedian. Intelligent. Not like these new young woke fucks like Amy schumer and James acaster
@@WakaWaka2468 well said, those other “comedians” ain’t got shit on Rowan Atkinson
I’m American and I WISH America could claim him as a national treasure. 😁 Ah well.
*international treasure
I still consider this one of the greatest speeches in modern times and increasingly valid as the years go by. It's such a shame it wasn't made in Parliament.
“Self appointed arbiters of the public good.” Couldn’t have said it better myself.
Mary Whitehouse has a lot to answer for.
It's as if all the people in the world who were always first "out" in dodge ball got together, read copies of "Rules For Radicals", and declared "NOW WE GET OUR REVENGE!!!". It's irrational, it's destructive, it's vengeful, and it's sociopathic at best -- psychopathic at worst.
There is a term for that in socialpsychology called Mindguards. They filter what the group gets to know and keeps people ignorant so they can control them into hating who they want.
As George Orwell warned - once you stop speaking freely, you will soon cease to think freely.
Adam Britain totally agree
just FYI, George Orwell was a libertarian socialist and 1984 was as much of a critique of rampant authoritarian capitalism as it was a critique of rampant authoritarian communism
Authoritarianism in all forms is wrong. Orwell can be right about the problem but wrong about the solution as so many have been before and since. The extreme of every political belief is terrible: whether it is Democracy, Capitalism, Communism, Socialism, Republicanism, Fascism, Libertarianism, Imperialism... the list goes on, but each pushed to the extreme is evil (some more than others). The best we've got so far is the western form of freedom based in Constitutional Republics/ Democracies. Freedom of Speech (& expression) are fundamental to the continuation of true progress.
That... is scary, I can relate to this a bit, can i have the source to this quote please,
Orwell was part of the elite. 1984 was a warning.
Rowan Atkinson, I have watched your movies for years and had no idea for what you stood for till now. I am now a huge fan of yours and respect you even more. God bless you sir.
Rowan is just saying what the vast majority of people think. Political correctness is gone completely out of hand. Like he said he used to make comedy sketches of this stuff damn good ones I might add they had everyone in stitches laughting. Who'd have thought that they'd become the excepted society values I.e you can't criticise someone because their Irish for example well I'm Irish and I'll take constructive criticism from anyone, preventing people from stopping or condemning wrong doing just because of a person's race sexuality or gender does far more harm than good.
@walter mitty
Unfortunately it doesn't seem the majority of people feel that way anymore.
Refreshing
Kind
Humane
God love him.
@@derschwarzgeist I think they do, but any resistance could cost them their career, freinds (who might secretly agree with him/her, but can't say so for the same reasons), relationship/kids or - if this culture reaches it's natural destination - their life.
Nevermind the films, watch the Blackadder series. Rowan at his finest.
I can't believe that he said this in 2012, it is 2024 now!!!!! The world has gotten SOOOO MUCH WORSE SINCE, and this applies today more than ever.
It's easy to forget that Rowan Atkinson is a highly educated, incredibly articulate and intelligent man. Well said.
To me it isn't, the man's a genius and that's clear as the desert sky to me
Easy for who? The man displays brilliance in every appearance.
@@deez1321 Oh yes, the insults given by the variuos Black Adders. How great they are.
@Ishzark Klyon Well most people just know him as Mr Bean or Johnny English...
he's a professor bruh
"If you don't believe in free speech for people you find repellent, you don't believe in free speech at all."
Mark Steyn
Yup and I just think these fact checkers became karen's. Fact checkers with feelings. One persons lies, is another persons reality. ruclips.net/video/ACVULnFtEKc/видео.html
Life is a two-way street.
Sounds more like Noam Chomsky
@Pasha Staravoitau That depends on the definition.
The US has a definition where hate speech and call to genocide is allowed, which on the other hand silences the victims of the hate speech.
So I guess the lesson from that example is:
Free speech is not only the right to say what it on your mind, but the right of others to critize your view with no other threat than being wrong.
So I agree with you, but remember, that not everyone has understood this difference.
@@57thorns Hate speech is allowed, yes. Not a call to genocide. I don't know where you came up with the idea that people in the U.S. can call for the death of others. It just isn't true.
This speech is more important now than it was when he originally gave it
richard dimeck exactly, I say that I like trump and BAM my cars windows get broken
I agree. Although, many people wow it now, but the moment they go outside they will forget all about his words...
Yeah not a coincidence it's getting recommended to me now
@@mh1647 they break your car windows you break their hospital bed
asura, being of wrath lmaooooo
2024, this aged like fine wine.
This speech would probably land him in jail in the UK of today.
A funny world isn't it, I get my news from comedians and jokes from journalists.
Its crazy how much things seem backwards today.
A funny world isn't it, many people like you value entertainment above all else causing news to mimic it.
*governments
@@kaibarrera9911 An interesting and quite rational look at the situation. The media only became this way because we allowed it to. Although, I do have to say, I believe the responsibility of the media is to the facts and the truth first, and views and profit second.
@@amihere383 To achieve this, media has to be excluded from the capitalist system.
How refreshing to see an Intelligent and eloquent man behind the mask of Mr. Bean
Edmund To be fair, Mr. Bean was the most widespread work of Rowan’s, because of his humorous acts without uttering a word. No language barrier to hold him.
I agree and think Rowan has made some very valid points but my first question to Rowan and supporters of this is, is there ever a free speech 'line' that shouldn't be crossed and if someone does cross this line then surely it must be right that consequences should follow ie being arrested?
Examples of this line might be making monkey chants at black people or being verbally sexually explicit to a child. After all these examples are 'only words'. Hell, with enough time and the protection of unlimited free speech then you could almost certainly verbally bully any child into committing suicide if you really wanted to but surely someone who does this shouldn't be free and protected should they?
For me it's not 'everyone must have free speech all the time on anything' as I don't think that works either. So my follow up questions if you supports are saying of course there's a line where free speech should become 'illegal' then:
Where is that line?
Who should decide where that line is drawn?
And who should enforce the censoring of free speech so that the people whom cross this line are brought to justice?
@@Speak_Out_and_Remove_All_Doubt I think you gravely misunderstand how laws work. Those are specific scenarios scenarios with special provisions dealing with them. Free speech is not an inviolable principle, nonsense like section 5 or no, and no one's advocating it be made one. You don't need carte blanche to send a van of troopers to haul someone off for questioning, and later - court, over any comment that could possibly be construed as being insulting to some undefined other. It's merely the default. That is, if it doesn't break any specific law - and there is no lack of laws dealing with harassment or the other things you mention - it should be fine. And if it isn't, you make a new law for that scenario. It doesn't supersede anything, so your talk about some hypothetical defense of it being "just words", or a need to draw a line, just does not make any sense.
Every law is a line. If you harass someone using "just words", you're going to get charged for harassment. If you threaten someone using "just words", you're going to be charged for issuing threats. If you blackmail someone using "just words", you're going to be charged with blackmail. You don't need nebulous, wide-sweeping laws like section 5 that criminalize any statement that could possibly be considered insulting to anyone for that. It's a non-factor. Section 5 or no, those laws still stand. The "free speech" you seem to be talking about does not exist and does not have proponents, at least not here.
Nothing you said has anything to do with section 5 or anything else in Rowan Atkinson's speech. You simply do not know what you're talking about.
Which, now that I look around, should've been obvious seeing as you're spamming this comment in every thread. You're clearly not here for the content. You're here to earn points for your "side".
Grow up. Get a real hobby. Spamming youtube comments isn't going to affect any change. Get off your ass and leave your room if you want to fancy yourself an activist.
@@trickydick7332 what you said is hurtful and I'm going to sue you!
never thought otherwise
I see again that we learn more from comedians these days and laugh at the politicians.
@@wahideheydari4551 irrespective of whether or not it's original, one cannot deny the truth it has, especially in this generation.
And the world has 7 billion people, you will DEFINITELY see this again 10 times by the next week👍
@@wahideheydari4551 Not really sure if anyone else have said this. Just commented what I feel is the truth. Also had a similar comment to a Dave Chappelle video
I feel its always been that way, look at the old story of how George carlin was arrested with another comedian, they let George go because he was pretty much a part of the Hollywood machine, not sure on the exact reason, but he realized this and changed for the better, him along with many other comedians of the time always preached about freedom and the dangers of censoring un popular speech.
Very true. Although last year Ukraine voted a comedian as their President and he swifty became "one of them". Although I think he didn't have much choice with Putin breathing down his neck. I don't think we will ever truly understand the pressure of a senior political role and how impossible it is to keep everyone happy.
Especially career politicians. Without any scruples.
Wow! Well put together. We need people who can think like this for the top offices. Everywhere. Truthful, bold, responsible, accountable.
People with those attributes have better things to spend their time on.
Such beautifully articulated words. Atkinson is a man of the people.
He's far from a man of the people, very intelligent though.
"None of the above", or NOTA for short, also known as "against all" or a "scratch" vote, is a ballot option in some jurisdictions or organizations, designed to allow the voter to indicate disapproval of the candidates in a voting system. Wikipedia
That's because he has greatly exercised his right to free speech. People who often express themselves get better at it, while those who repressed their thoughts tend to be less articulate. That's because when people don't express they tend to only dwell in insolated thoughts, thoughts that might not even be their own. When your thoughts go unchallenged, you don't see both the positive and negative.
Man FOR the people
It’s a bit of a weird statement to make, this, because, regardless of how people feel about the posh fella talking about preserving free speech, he is posh and has never had any right to free speech to begin with. Pointless calling anyone “a man of the people” when the people already have free speech. It’s the one thing we get that the posh people can’t have.
This guy can take a serious topic, Make it funny but still taken seriously. That's a talent
Just like how it was funny as his car was getting crushed under a tank and then when he saw it, everything just turned sad.
はい
Free speech is ok but ur not free of consequences.
@@kaleb51 What do you mean free of consequences, consequences like the gov jailing you?
@Seb Rosellini ok,
Anyone else blown away by the fact that an actor possibly most known for a role in which the character doesn't speak has to be a champion for free speech..
He was better known as the straight talking Blackadder to many of us.
His charlie Chaplin moment
The fact that he played the main characters in both shows how talented a comedian he is. One is very wordy and known for its word play, the other is pure physical comedy.
I appreciate your consise and profound opinion. Well said!
You can say a hell of a lot without any words at all. I say this all the time.
This should be shown on TV daily, so we wouldn't have any of the problems we have since 2020. Bravo Mr. Atkinson 👏
Crowd: *laughing*
Rowan, eyeing them and thinking: "Did I make a fucking joke?"
i think the point he is making besides obvious, is that the current state of freedom of speech is a joke.
Yes; the lying media found this funny. Ironic, the media is cheering on the suppression of expression.
Exactly, just goes to show the jello filled brains inhabiting some peoples craniums.
@@milesrudduck Cancel Culture
No laughs from me. He’s on point with how serious this issue is.
Isn’t it great that we can experience the English language, spoken in such an eloquent manner.
"None of the above", or NOTA for short, also known as "against all" or a "scratch" vote, is a ballot option in some jurisdictions or organizations, designed to allow the voter to indicate disapproval of the candidates in a voting system. Wikipedia
It saddens me that my parents would be lost by the eloquency and lose sight of the message. They would go "What does that mean?" and go about their business not giving a hoot about free speech being restricted.
@@Jacob-qr8pl this , this exactly, my parents do the same and I'm just sitting there like ,"wtf? How can you just abandon a thought in the middle if you don't understand the vocabulary, just look it up in the dictionary or something "
@@ananyabhagat7052 exactly.
I was thinking that the whole time.
Imagine if more celebrities were even half as smart and eloquent as this one.
Or politicians. Oh, wait - that's not going to happen.
@deviantrebel well if people actually took the time to go through Rushdie's books like SHAME or Satanic verses, perhaps the outrage industry would have been a thing of the past.
@deviantrebel The Romans held actors in the same regard as prostitutes. I say we revise this tradition.
the uk and eu are run by communists, that's the problem. if everything is getting worse and more communists have gotten into government then perhaps there may be a slight chance that there's a correlation 👨🏫🤡
Check out Bean's I.Q score it's friggin bonkers dude is a genius
Ironic that the little skit he did years ago was becoming a reality today, but that's definitely a speech worth listening to and much needed these days.
Well said Rowan, beautifully spoken. 👏
“ .... a creeping culture of censoriousness...” We appear to have arrived.
indeed. i weep. (inb4 it reaches my country)
Welcome to the Bipolar World !!!
and it's getting worse ... you haven't hit rock bottom if you can say "I've hit rock bottom"
When the young people become older people their young children will kill them for their views.
That's the only positive I can find in this sad part of the human race.
What goes around comes around!!!
Censorship so bad that it will inevitably tear my country apart(usa).
"We need to build our immunity to taking offence" That's it.
@@simongill4715 That's also true, but this was a speech to bring light to the problem of censorship against free speech. Although the Murdoch empire also plays a big part in that, it's far from the whole problem
And people should strive to be nicer.
@@mrnulliustestikleezeeastee7365 But half of the time people are offended by something that was never intended to be unpleasant in any way. A culture of "offended because someone said anything at all" has developed. And that culture includes getting angry because someone has given you constructive criticism.
Then, covid strikes.
@@mrnulliustestikleezeeastee7365 Or, people should strive to be better people.....
An actor that actually knows what he is talking about and is actually in touch with reality? good heavens!
They're a dying breed.
The fact that he's a highly educated gentleman might factor into that as well.
@@R_Caine I think you're right, Anthony Hopkins said himself during an interview that most actors don't really now how the world really works, he also said that he is willing to take part into intesresting discussions but that he would surely not contribute as much as an expert would. Self-aware and humble actors are so rare nowadays.
People who do satire have to be informed, interested and clever
Hi, Doppio.
Rowan is one of the smartest comedians to ever live, which is why he's here talking about actual issues.
Insult has become hate speech, how did we come to this!! Brilliant speech, needs to be heard more today.
I'm wondering too
And not even insults: Scientology IS a cult! Even strongly-worded facts are hate speech...
no it hasnt.
Insults and hate speech are NOT the same, and should NOT be treated as such. When you call someone an "ignorant sh*thead" and tell them they should "read a book," you are insulting them. When you call someone "a blight on society" and tell them they should "f*ck off and die," that is no mere insult, and to treat it as "just" an insult is to enable far worse.
Yes, we should be tolerant of insults. But there are limits.
Twitter is calling Rowan a "racist sympathiser" ffs how can you hate rowan?
Twitter as an entity isn't calling anyone anything.
@@Nisshoku You know what he meant
Easy. In this talk he's talking from a position of power without recognizing how intolerance works if you're not a middle aged upper class white male. What he's advocating *would not affect him*.
Twitter is a cesspool full of liberal turds.
@@samiraperi467 He literally said that he knows he will barely or even at all be affected by these laws, and he knows that. But he's advocating for reforming a shitty law that apparently allows you to be arrested for saying something going against social standard. How the Hell is that racist?
Rowan Atkinson could read the user manual for a toaster-oven and it would still be a privilege and a joy to listen to him.
Especially if he brings a slab of salmon to test it out in the store, and then selects a packaged one instead.
I love the way he speaks. All I see is this generations blackadder.
Then you're not looking hard enough, Rowan Atkinson is deadly serious about this subject.
@@robertdore9592 Very true fine sir 👍
My friend this it the true Rowan Atkinson.
Hello. An American here. Forgive my ignorance but what is 'blackadder ' ?
@@bdsingletary Blackadder is a British show staring Rowan Atkinson in the same spirit as the Monty Python if you know them.
The audience were laughing as Mr. Atkinson was referencing three examples, then notice no one was laughing as he continued his powerful message. This is not Mr. Bean, but a man of knowledge who owns respect.
A highly articulate and meaningful speech from a silent comedian & electrical engineer. Rowan Atkinson is indeed a man of many talents.
Imagine if this was a Mr Bean episode where he's somehow landed on stage and is terribly timid with the situation of course, but then he whips this speech out. The episode title could be 'Mr Beans First Words'
Also Blackadder!
He’s only a silent comedian in one or two roles.
Silent? 😂😂😂😂
He does use his voice in many of his roles, Mr. Bean is a great character.
“He who takes offense when offense was not intended is a fool, yet he who takes offense when offense is intended is an even greater fool for he has succumbed to the will of his adversary.” -Brigham Young
Or as my late father put it, "It's not what they call you, it's what you answer to."
Someone can only make you feel poorly with speech alone if you value their opinion. In being offended, one surrenders power to the offender.
The only people who could possibly offend me are people I love, and only then if what they are saying is true.
If what they say is not true, then it has no weight, and even if what they say is true, I probably already know it, so the saying of it brings me no discomfort.
There are SO many good quotes by LDS general authorities past and present.
Nut Bastard
Man. I love that insight thank you.
Arnox Immordium
Are you a member?
@@jacobandersen6075 Yes.
Well it’s 2020 and RUclips just suggested this to me........
Genuine UK me too. Go figure
Me as well
Me three
Irony Xx
The videos I watch now give links to other sites cos they can't talk on RUclips Xx
Thank you Rowan. What utter common sense, beautifully and articulately voiced.
Please let's all get to grips with getting rid of the madness of intolerance to trivial things, and let's put it into history.
Rowan was on the money then and it is even more applicable today....
comedians explaining basic human rights and politicians making people laugh...the story of our age
It really do be like that...
Dude this coment is so original, holy shit, you are my new god now, is really a unprecedent coment, i am being ironic if you stupid don't get
So true
Best comment ever 😂
Ha haaaa - WELL PUT!! Couldn't agree more!?
Disagreeing with someone does not constitute hate speech.
Depends on how you are disagreeing. By legal attack, by crossing the person out of the right to disagree, or by braking into his home and arrest him! They all are happening now a days as referring to covid19 negative opinions.
@@ΑικατερίνηΔήμα-σ4γ only problem is that's not actually happening. The only ones being arrested are shit-stirring conspiracy theorists, who can't be bothered with a real job so they resort to manipulating vulnerable and gullible people for a living. They don't have an opinion to begin with, they have an agenda. They're not being silenced, they're being dealt with.
Many hard left people think they are centrists. So to argue with them is to be extreme right in their biased point of view. This is why they've been attacking even the left of center and crapping on the legacy of greats such as MLK. Now the hard right is crazy too but at least they have the decency to know they are hard right.
@@newworldorderguy4040 The problem with your glib and facile comment is who gets to determine what speech "needs to be dealt with" - as if some wise and benevolent agency was there to pass judgement on what speech was worthy and what was not. What needs limitation is governments that feel they have the responsibility to determine what is acceptable and what isn't. The mass of people are better at that than any "enlightened" expert.
@@larryphilby4918 do you need someone to explicitly point out who is talking bullshit? Have you never noticed that they all follow the same patterns, and they have done since the first ever cult was formed?
I'm going to ignore your "glib and facile" part and assume that's just you exercising your right to free speech, rather than passing sound judgement.
Very eloquent and sensible speech which apparently was completely ignored and led to nothing.
Best speech ever delivered on this subject. He surpassed the politicians
Fair play to you...Rowan for making this very good speech...the government, worldwide are up to something very big....
Other than Daniel Hannan, I agree
@@willywonka9967 Hey Willy, you haven't figured it out yet? TOTAL control.
Oh I'm awake a long time ago, common sense is the key...non conplicance..👍
Похоже он превосходит всех за что берётся
Can't believe it, this was 8 years ago. We certainly haven't gone in the direction he suggested we should. It's getting really bad, so bad in fact, that I have started to avoid speaking to certain people I deem as overly sensitive.
8887ĺm.,nmlp
Ù .
..
Have you seen how Anne Hathaway has had to apologise over the witches film because it offended people missing a finger or some bullshit.
@@hikorishi No! Jesusless are they mad?
Sensitive. You mean self-righteous
@@hikorishiyes. i feel that that is condescending to them . . To say itcwoukd upset them
"Saying "That's offensive" is not an argument." - Christopher Hitchens
"That's offensive!"
"Ah! So you concede?"
No, but we're now on the record that Hitchens was offensive.
_It's not an argument, _*_asshole_*
"Saying "Your parents are ugly" is also not an argument" - me
It's a statement, let's not try and outlaw that too😕
The comparison with children's immune system was spot on. I've never thought about free speech in that way, but it's absolutely true.
But we aren't allowed to build immunity the natural way anymore. Now we're all supposed to vaccinate ourselves instead of catch a cold.
Wait, we still have sensible celebrities in this country? Holy shit
When it takes Mr. Bean to talk some sense into us - you know it's getting bad.
@@garychap8384 He's a Cambridge graduate
@@WakaWaka2468 And he's Mr. Bean
@@forksandpopsticles9183 💀
Should listen Gervais to😁
Oh how I wish my american celebrities were so deliberate, well spoken and clearly thoughtful when they opine. Dude is amazing.
Well most American celebrities didn't go to and graduate from Oxford with a degree in a STEM field. I believe Mr Atkinson studied electrical engineering.
@@2013branth With some strong amount of luck, and after a strenuous search, I believe you might actually be able to find an American celebrity that at best, approved all tests involving "Play-Doh 101" and "Glue Usage 101 and 102" back in Kindergarten. Those would be the cultivated kind, that some times rise to prominence, end up having their own talk shows, etc. It's quite curious that strongly educated, genious-level celebrities like "The Offspring" singer Dexter Holland, who holds a Ph,D, in Mollecular Biology, and happens to be a Virologist as well, are often quiet and dedicated to their job.
Many celebrities are, but they're the ones despised and suppressed by their fellow Hollywood neighbors and the media. They don't get a voice because they're not towing the party line.
@@hansvonmannschaft9062 I suppose the higher you climb up the totem pole, the more professional you become, and the more you keep your private life separate from your work life. That being said, intelligence does not mean you're immune from becoming an ideologue. After all, the inner circle of Nazis leadership had genius-level IQs.
How bout Morgan Freeman's interview where he disregarded the black history month as bullshit, said black history is American history and called for people to stop caring about race if they want to end racism?
A smart, well-spoken man with a good education, expressing logical opinions. Sadly, so rare these days.
Sandy Jones You really out here saying diversity affects intelligence
Sandy Jones do tell what’s happening in those cities. Burst my “liberal bubble” with facts and stats.
How far we have fallen when we have a pressing need to hear more smart and sensible discourse such as this. Well said and thank you Rowan.
He put his career in jeopardy, to stand up for ALL Britains, and their right to “free speech!”
No his career is done his multi millionaire and I'm pretty sure owns a f1 team or drives them. His career was done when he started Johnny english
He's a hero for saying these things
Not only britain its world wide
All Britons.
In United States, we have a Bill of rights which is a part and parcel of the constitution. Amongst which, the 1st Amendment categorically says that 'Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech or freedom of the press'.
Beautifully said. Unfortunately this will probably go over the heads of anyone who previously thought that insulting someone was a criminal offence.
Well, he does say "We all have to take responsibility for what we say.", which isn't really free speech, it's technically just advocating for censorship on both sides to maintain status quo rather than censoring just one group.
Or at least that's the sort of language a politician would use to push for more censorship, not less.
Now you can give him benefit of the doubt if you like, maybe it was just worded poorly.
However if you hear a politician repeat those words though, you should get worried as every time you can interpret politician's language as being double-talk, it usually is.
I actually started this video violently disagreeing with some of the things that he was saying, and by the end I was completely agreeing with him
Indeed, i am starting to treat climate change denial, Hate Speech, Anti-Semitism and Unclean conspiracy Theories as a Disease to Free speech
@@jeanclaudejunior Stupid opinions are fixed with more speech, not less speech.
Empirical evidence as well as open and transparent discourse is best because then stupid opinions are revealed for what they are.
If you enshrine people with academic titles and high positions in social hierarchy to a status of priesthood and silence opposing points of view, you aren't going to convince anyone on your facts, all you are convincing them of is that you are willing to use force to shut them up when they disagree with you, making them natural allies with everyone else you have censored thus far.
@@strongback6550 But i insist that climate change denial, Hate Speech, Anti-Semitism and Unclean conspiracy Theories are to be declared as a disease to free speech and incompatible with it
Mr. Bean breaks 30 years of silence with a very important message!
You might have missed, black adder, the thin blue line and ofcourse the more recent johny english 😉
E K he wasn’t called mr bean in them you just mugged yourself off
He does speak he says beeeean
Adam Sandler ahh crap😅
@@EK-em2zv Blackadder? Splendid fellow, who knows how to handle a sliced mango.
One of the best speeches I’ve ever had the pleasure of hearing.
i'm surprised this video wasn't blacklisted and erased off the internet yet
That's a good point.
Prolly be taken down soon.
They would just attract more attention to it on other sites and prove that he is right.
So does that mean you might entertain the idea that the "hate speech censorship" ting has been dramatized and exaggerated by a bunch of bored Westerners who haven't (really) been affected (too much) by : a) what they're actually talking about; b) the worse extreme of what they're talking about ???
Stand up for #FreeSpeech
Remember when people thought like this, not any more.
That is because idiotic ideas can be infectious and impervious to facts or reasoned debate: eg flat-earthers. I was evangelical about the internet in the early 90's, thinking it would lead to global enlightenment, instead we had Trump and his tweets. I don't think the answer is as simple as we once thought .
People do but it's those with power who abuse it and make others scared. Police have too much grey area to arrest someone for nothing. As Rowan talks about the act (basically) allowing police to arrest just because someone might be offended.
@@sqgl how good were those days when flat earth was the most idiotic idea.
How dare you even think that way. I have informed the thought police and you shall be arrested forthwith!
People do still think like this, but cancel culture stops their voice being heard
When Rowan Atkinson feels like a giant in front of puny politics and media, even long ago when i saw him in old top gear i thought, "that guy is awesome".
12 years later and it's worse than he could have imagined. Great speech but now it's just sad to listen to because we know how things have played out.
2024 is the year the Scottish Government introduced Chicken Licences. We need Monty Python now more than ever.
@@kvdp9543 seems to be a general flock licence to track disease, nationwide from 1st oct for eng and wales. The excuse is the global h5n1 issue
8 years after these words were spoken, they ring truer than ever. Here in Canada, we have become so overly sensitive to unharmful words and actions, it's not even funny. Thank you Rowan Atkinson. This video should be viewed and heard by our politicians, media and police forces.
Harm is measured by laws against libel, slander, and defamation, as well as applicable anti racism laws. What is Canada's equivalent of the Constitution of the united states?
Our politicians know exactly what they're doing. Trudeau is China's puppet. They've been bribing him. Look at his ethics violations.
It's a Maoist takeover. Our elites want access to China's giant market, and that means playing by Communist China's rules, which are evil. That's why they all hate President Trump. He's defending America and the world from Communist Chinese takeover. Our one advantage we have is Communists are very stupid, and over the years, they've been exposing themselves.
Watch Crossroads with Joshua Phillipp or China Uncensored here on RUclips to follow the developments in this new Cold War with China. We will prevail! Trump 2020!
@@StopFear It's the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. But it's nowhere as good as the American constitution when it comes to protecting peoples liberty. It includes the vague "right to equality", which basically means it can't stop Socialism and Communism. The ideology we're up against is older than many people realize.
Bob Domler Remember if the government gives you something ( charter of freedoms and rights) it can take it away. Rights are inalienable and “ God” given. This is one reason the UK doesn’t have a codified charter of rights, and neither should it have. In the case of Canada it is being seduced into a degree of Socialism it will regret. Trudeau et al have a dangerous socio political agenda which will further cause a greater degree of division which could result in the separation of a once rich and thriving nation. I have come to the conclusion after the US it is the world’s richest third world nation because of its acceptance of political corruption, plummeting standard of living, abject poverty of its indigenous people, and pliable police force.
@@jonnyboy2128 One thing you have to understand about Canada's indigenous people is the government deals with the chiefs, and of course the chiefs are all corrupt. They take the government's money, keep it for themselves, while their tribes live in squalor. So it's not necessarily the governments fault. It's the chiefs themselves that are corrupt. It's a mess!
Imagine this man be the next prime minister. It would be marvelous
I dont think he would want to ...meetings and parliament are boring and everybody arguing on top of one another ...ouch
@@ananamu2248 and angry protesters. There's always will be a group of angry protesters.
@@mattardyantoriyadi strangely enough the sound of arrogant voices putting forward their " penny worth" is worse than the noise of people protesting...hmmm is it the opposed arguing vs protesters togetherness?
real intelligent people do not involve themselves in politics, so I don't think that your wish would come true
I hate people that do this. They see a good speech and conflate it to running the entire country. Enjoy the speech, stop talking shit.
well articulated argument, sadly things have deteriorated even further since 2012 world wide.
Elmar Tobi yep we are in the gutter rolling in filth. Apparently enjoying our own demise
Yeah. Since the rise in racist nationalism.
@@madrockon7357 you are a fool. The right aren't fining you for getting their bogus pronouns wrong or cancelling people.
@@warmhum5918 That is because to be politically Right Wing, you are likely nationalistic, Pro upkeep of old traditions and values. Also in some cases racist towards other minority groups. Modern Political Leftists aren't racist. Political leftists are also pro freedom and diverse, which puts them at the front line of civilization's progressive evolution. To make sure we don't get sent back in time to bashing rocks together, extreme racism must be moderated in order to stop fascism from returning from the grave. It's as simple as that. Don't like it? Sorry, nothing i can do for you about that. If you are secretly racist, that is your problem, not mine.
@@madrockon7357 wall of text. No right people are cancelling anyone. We make up about a fifth of the media sources. You are so totally wrong its hilarious.
I absolutely adore this man.
People can't help laughing when Rowan Atkinson speaks because he is naturally and famously funny but on this occasion, in this video, he is deadly serious and concerned about our civil liberties when it comes to our freedom of speech! Well said Rowan!!
Yeah the laughs were cringe. Dude wasn't telling any jokes. They just assume once he's on stage he's there to entertain them. Sad.
The gay horse bit was honestly funny. Absurd, yes. But that is hilarious.
Absurd that it is actually real life.
I really liked his Maigret series
It seemed to me he meant the list of ludicrous things to be slightly humorous or at least knew people would laugh. And also the reasons for the black man being arrested. Arrested for walking all over the place? funny.
Some was intended to be humorous, but not all, yet people laughed where no laughing was justified.
Some people do the same when hearing John Cleese speaking about serious matters.
One of the best speeches I have heard in my 32 years of life. One of the most important of this generation.
You sleep better when you know there are such educated people that care about what is important
Then you remember thay those in charge don't listen to we'll reasoned arguments well made, they listen to money and they listen to ranting hate mobs. Everything else can be ignored.
It's the uneducated people who don't care that keep me awake.
We'll always need people like Rowan,people that make us laugh.
The law is doing a fine job of achieving the same result.
@@upturnedblousecollar5811 Absolutely true,wonder where they're trained, Wankers 'R' Us.
Being polite here, you understand.
Censorship is telling a man he cannot have a steak, just because babies cannot chew them.
- Mark Twain
censorship is telling a man he cannot have a chew, just because babies cannot steak them.
-Murk twins
@@Gureenu Cents, or ship, are at Bay B Twain; marked by a chewed stake.
- Two Murky III
ALMualim - المعلم about as funny as a burning orphanage. Try harder next time “ye bro”.
@@dandong8351 sooo.... Fucking hilarious then? I mean come on... Their parent didn't want them around and now neither does god.
@@Gureenu censorship is telling an Arab he can't have a pita because a camel can't chew them
Funny how this is recommended to me now this needs to be heard now more than ever September 2020
I agree, it does make one wonder what agenda youtube and google have with their algorithms.. Suppress and reveal as required.. By whom or what we will never know, unless one wishes to pay large sums of cash for such large companies to bend in one's favour.
widdle donnie are you listening ?
funny that yt recommends a video pointing out their censorism^^ I would have expected them to delete this video because "community guidelines" or terrorism or whatever.
@@daic7274 What if the algorithm's only purpose is to get you to watch more videos and ads!? And the best way its worked out to do that is to manipulate your emotions, and create conflict and emergency.
Ditto!
Mr. Bean is smarter than most people in the government.
Yes, all over the world.
Love from Merkill-Germoney
🌎🕊🙋🏼♀️🇩🇪
Freiheit und Selbstbestimmung !
@RedDemoon it's pointing out the fact that people nowadays are so sensitive that they will contact the police and ask them to make an arrest on somebody because of what they said online, and the police respond to this call and make the arrest, not because someone *has* caused offence, but because they *might* cause offence.
Police in the UK have becoming increasingly more responsive to these kinds of calls, and have started to bend more to the will of the "politically correct". It's at a point where police won't arrest people of colour or Muslims, because they're scared that they'll be called racists/islamophobes, which could lead to a mob demanding they be arrested or shut down.
Not sure if it was a verified article about IQ testing, but it stated he had a very high score, like 170--180 region. That would make him smarter than any parliament member.
Change MOST to ALL
Mr Bean for president 💪😆😜
Highly educated role model … respect to this man
Political Correctness is NOT the Language of a Free People.
its language of communism
@@grodt88 Its not even the language of communism. Its the language of authoritarianism.
The biggest problem with the usage of "political correctness" on the internet is that free speech goes both ways. If you express values that goes against what is socially regarded as accepted, (being racist, nazi, homophobe etc. things that goes against established human rights). People will argue against you, due to moral standpoints. The person using "political correctness" as a slur is generally using it as a cheap defense mechanism in arguments since they want to silence the other party, bullying them to think that they somehow aren't "free thinkers". And THIS is where things go wrong in my opinion. In a world of free speech, take the argument instead. that's what it is all about. And I will always argue against people that have, in my opinion, bad moral standards. And I except people to do the same against me.
but the legal framework of choice for our political classes !
@@PixelShade Personally im sick of it all, sick of being told what I can and cant say, can or cant do, what opions im allowed to have etc - its ridiculous! They are taking away our humanity.
"Sure, humor can hurt, even alienate. But the risk is better than the alternative: a steady diet of innocuous, childproof, flavorless mush. Demand to be challenged, to be offended, to be treated like thinking, reasoning adults. And raise your children to be the same. Don't let a comedian, a network, a congressional committee, or an evil genius take away your freedom to laugh at whatever you want."
-Duckman
Atkinson isn't just talking about humour. He's talking about the right of others to insult and hate others, usually minority groups. Is there such a thing as inciteful hate speech? Just last year an Australian man murdered 51 New Zealanders and then wanted Free Speech to spread his ideals. Should he have freedom of speech? I think not, as did our Government.
@@Albert_Br if there's a reason his ideas become popular and spread, its because there's a deeper issue which is being ignored, not because he's an entertaining writer. Censoring only inflames the topic. That's what happens when you suppress the viewpoint of a worthy opponent. Reacting to the moral indignation of hearing a clashing viewpoint to that of your own through the force of law, is always the gateway which allows a resolvable problem to transform to war.
@@ron4520 cheers Ron, ditto
@@ron4520 this. Why would anyone want or even allow the government to put in place and enforce these rules? Can you imagine if a real dictator got into power? This dictator has all these rules in place that don't allow anyone to speak out against the gov. Then we get something similar to what's happening in China right now as we speak. Where people are getting killed, their families threatened, arrested with life sentences.
The slope is way too slippery. And you give enough power to those in charge and they'll run a damn mile with it.
We're seeing it in the UK with Count Dankula, and others being arrested for what they've said online.
@@Albert_Br you can't pick and choose what is and isn't free speech. What happened in NZ had bugger all to do with free speech. And it's a shame you believe a government should control what you say.
I wouldn’t feel free to insult him because he’s a top geezer talking rare sense
Insulting Rowan Atkinson in person would always be a big mistake. He would wipe the floor with you without the slightest effort.
@@robinlillian9471 Not if those words hurt my feelings then that means he can be arrested. Muhahaha.
Society has gone crazy.
Journey awaits He is a bloody good driver as well
Geezer. Stop, punk pimple, He's far more handsome than you, Dunlop
@@robinlillian9471 "Insulting Rowan Atkinson in person" - that will be top entertainment.
I was so impressed by this man's great wisdom and excellent delivery of his ideas. Bravo!
It's hard to believe we've come to this.
just have to look at britain, australia and new zealand to see what's in store for the rest of the west if we keep letting commies into power by using our empathy against us to control us. It's sickening.
@@sinephase yep police have become very powerful since covid. It is becoming like pre WWI Germany what I studied at school in history is actually happening again.
@@alidarke3132 I'll have to look into that :)
@@sinephase look up Avi Melbourne and Sydney arrests
As adults, we should have seen this coming a long time ago.
Homestly, I blame myself, you and society as a whole. No offense
We could have, should have stopped this before it happened.
*_"It's important that we're exposed to a wide spectrum of opinion, but what we have now is the digital equivalent of the medieval mob roaming the streets looking for someone to burn."_* -Rowan Atkinson
Time for the Internet Inquisition!
"Nobody expects the Internet Inquisition!" ~ Monty Python, 2021
Is this "wide spectrum of opinion" only shared by a group of people or all races in the world? It is also extremely worrying that this "wide spectrum of free speech" is obviously become the breeding ground of extremism and opinions notoriously leaned towards to the two poles that never meet.
yeah we have physical equivalent also
Beware of troll monsters on the Internet
He is an Oxford graduate witj a degree and master's in electrical engineering
Electrical engineering a tough degree too. He is definitely a smart man.
now thats really interesting
MaYbE bUt DoEs He HaVe A dEgReE iN gEnDeR sTuDiEs?!!
_says a Karen.
Education aside, he's always been a smart guy. Many slapstick comedians and clowns are wise, because they're humble and observing so they learn quickly.
@@knightmare3706 and i minor in fat studies too
Hear hear. Thank you Rowan Atkinson.
We need people like Rowan Atkinson. Not because he's famous, although it might help, but because he is standing up for what is right! We need Free Speech! 👏🙂👍❤️
Or better yet, we need to learn to be like him in this respect!
@@jmwoods190 Or learn that free speech was granted except they just fall back on section 43 now. Covers all bases? Child was playing football and that tackle was a little rough must be a perfect example to use section 43 eh constable savage?
As he pointed out, it's only because of his fame and privilege that he is allowed to speak the truth
We do have free speech
This was from 2012 almost 10 years later we got even more censorious.
"Prescient" doesnt even cover it. Im sure he couldnt imagine how bad it wd get. Whooda thunk it?
Wait, this says 2 years, not 9. Are they wrong?
Soooo sadly 😥true! Welcome to Orwell's 1984 and to the Aldous Huxley "Brave New World"!
I find it sad how this video is even more relevant 9 years later, rather than less
@@kadenplays573 Very sad and very true.
@@janetwhite7786 "This speech by Rowan Atkinson at the launch event in Parliament in 2012..."
So eloquently said. And totally true.
Thank you Mr Bean, you may not say much but when you do it is spot on.
It’s pretty grim times when comedians are stating common sense and politicians are creating laws that are a joke
Artists use lies to tell the truth, while politicians use the truth to tell lies
The best comedians tend to be extremely smart & very tolerant of all society & embrace those perceived imperfections of law abiding society & see it instead as character. Through that, humour ensues.
Oh shit that just hit me..... damn....... 😧
Whats more dire is that this(politicians telling lies) is being displayed so openly that it gradually wore poeple down to the point of it being treated as 'the norm'.
@@L3monsta Isn't this from Camut?
Rowan Atkinson was always a person whose art I deeply admired, the razor sharp witty humour he delivered over the past half a century puts him in the pantheon of the world's most renown comedians. After this speach, he also became a hero.
It's been a month but looks like nobody mentioned this to you, you kind of misspelt an important word there. You might want to fix it so that you won't be embarrassed in the future.
"None of the above", or NOTA for short, also known as "against all" or a "scratch" vote, is a ballot option in some jurisdictions or organizations, designed to allow the voter to indicate disapproval of the candidates in a voting system. Wikipedia
@@robinwolstenholme6377 Does voting as NOTA have any impact? If there is a high % of NOTA votes will it stop the election process, or the formation of government. I don't see how the NOTA votes will ever matter.
@@Omkar.Gawade Yeah NOTA is pretty stupid.
This video couldn’t be more relevant today.
Hard believe that our society has decayed to a point where words of common sense like this must be spoken out loud. And it is terrifying to see that this is 4 years old, and things only got worse.
I have seen a little glimpses of hope from UK lately. Maybe it will get better.
Indian here, We are watching this happening right now. Its heartbreaking.
The Speech is actually from 2012. don’t forget that. Even more concerning.
When the world becomes a joke that Mr.Bean is no longer trying to be funny
sad😔
Word.
Mr Bean was never funny.
@@matguimond92 You are sadly missing out on some of the finer points of life.
@@matguimond92 one thing for sure, you arent funny
Well said Rowan Atkins, a truly articulate man who speaks so much sense. Worth a second listen of anybodies time.
From Romania. Living in a Socialist Communist State
m.facebook.com/notes/dana-faina-waters/living-under-communism/10160399173619447/
@@jennifervictore5471 Watch it, thank you. God bless America, God bless Romania.
Imagine getting to the point in our society where Mr. Bean is more articulate, and speaks more persuasively and with greater substance than the vast majority of politicians.
u know,,,,mr. bean is not real,,,,, right?
That this surprises you is... depressing. Those who are the most articulate and possessed of substance are rarely found in elected positions. Instead those positions are filled by those who are merely charismatic and persuasive in the absence of substance, like our outgoing President, Ronald Reagan, or Arnold Schwartzenegger.
Mr. Rowan Atkinson is perhaps the most articulate speaker of the English language today. But, I guess one could argue that his co-star from "Black Adder", Mr. Stephen Fry, is his equal in that regard. It is highly ironic that Americans know him as "Mr. Bean." I am thrilled by Mr. Atkinson's message here, but I am afraid it is too late. The pendulum is swinging towards social control and tyranny in Britain and in much of the world.
Mister Fry is indeed his arguable equal. If the two of them together were the spokesmen of a continued effort to reverse this authoritarian progression, they would be difficult to dismiss.
Sadly , we reached that time many years ago.
Rowan Atkinson is surprisignly well spoken. His mind is sharp and his words cut deep into narcissits's nonsense.