Federal Attorney - Warrantless Cell Phone Seizure at Airports | Homeland Security & Customs Searches

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 12 сен 2024

Комментарии • 490

  • @JBrownLLL
    @JBrownLLL Месяц назад +80

    This is eye-opening! I did not realize the extent to which our privacy could be invaded at airports. Thanks for breaking down the complexities of warrantless cell phone seizures and giving actionable advice on how we can protect ourselves. Definitely sharing this with my friends and family!

    • @ericgardner5548
      @ericgardner5548 Месяц назад +2

      Only coming into the US.

    • @user-yq3fz9ch5q
      @user-yq3fz9ch5q 27 дней назад +10

      And as an added bonus....the U.S. border inspection area extends 100 miles inland😒thanks to that Patriot Act. We wuz robbed😤

    • @user-yq3fz9ch5q
      @user-yq3fz9ch5q 27 дней назад

      ​​@@ericgardner5548no see above

    • @williamelewis464
      @williamelewis464 25 дней назад

      They don’t need to seize your phone from you, you should look up a program called Pegasus. Your entire phone can be downloaded replicated and redirected to a virtual clone on a desktop pc. What this law firm is dealing with are the lowest part of the information food chain: local law enforcement.

    • @KRich408
      @KRich408 25 дней назад

      ​@@user-yq3fz9ch5q I was on vacation in Arizona I wanted to take I8 East until I found out they had border checks along this interstate highway. So I avoided it . Not that I had anything to hide I just didn't want random people going into my RV "My Home" illegally without a warrant and holding me up while I protested against it. And possibly needing a lawyer to protect my rights

  • @frankmoore3598
    @frankmoore3598 26 дней назад +116

    “ In the name of public safety “ the new cry of the oppressor

    • @JoeBlow-jj9uu
      @JoeBlow-jj9uu 23 дня назад +5

      Officer safety too

    • @mulengroak4687
      @mulengroak4687 22 дня назад +3

      "For your safety"
      That was a favorite excuse in the Third Reich.

    • @jaylove5555
      @jaylove5555 20 дней назад +3

      New???

    • @Don.Challenger
      @Don.Challenger 19 дней назад +1

      Well, things have indeed changed since mobile phone access meant and consisted of having the proper coinage to use the pay phones along your travel route (1995 or earlier) - no custom official scrutinized your pocket change very much. And other digital devices more or less as available for meaningful search or seizure.

  • @pennypackmtb2542
    @pennypackmtb2542 22 дня назад +78

    TSA wanted to search my phone after their frisk search. I said "I do not consent" they said I would miss my flight. I asked why I was being bullied, loud enough to draw attention. I stated I was a Veteran and I did not sign up to protect a nation that treats it's citizens like property. Oh, I was loud. Not belligerent, but enough to get people with cell phone to start a video. As soon as I said," Please do take a video," TSA let me by.

    • @josefmazzeo6628
      @josefmazzeo6628 21 день назад +13

      Good for you! More people need to learn to stand up to this BS. It's all really by CONSENT.

  • @terrylorrah6725
    @terrylorrah6725 29 дней назад +152

    It really concerns me when an attorney says that the government has rights. People have rights. Government does not have rights. Government has powers, not rights!

    • @Packetloss277
      @Packetloss277 27 дней назад +3

      Who sets the rights of the people within their borders? The government.

    • @juliana.x0x0
      @juliana.x0x0 25 дней назад +17

      @@Packetloss277those rights are inherent; yes, they were set by people who became part of the government, but they had run from tyranny to have a free life. And because of that, they set up a foundation and structure for our rights. That's why they are inalienable rights.

    • @ssaraccoii
      @ssaraccoii 25 дней назад +10

      Close. Per the Constitution, the government has powers, the People have rights.

    • @terrylorrah6725
      @terrylorrah6725 24 дня назад +9

      @@ssaraccoii Thank you for pointing this out. I have amended my original statement accordingly. My point still remains. Attorneys talk about government rights. Shouldn't those scholars of the law know better?

    • @BillLaBrie
      @BillLaBrie 23 дня назад

      Even lawyers have been indoctrinated into thinking of the US government as an empire that grants rights.

  • @user-ov3cw8iy2c
    @user-ov3cw8iy2c 29 дней назад +86

    If you are a frequent traveler, you should get a separate phone just for that that doesn’t contain all that pertinent information.

    • @freewillchoice8052
      @freewillchoice8052 27 дней назад +2

      Yeah but if you need the info in your phone and don’t have it….or bring a tablet instead and that gets searched instead, etc. frequent travelers are more often than not for business purposes so having digital devices with information is common.

    • @cynthiarowley719
      @cynthiarowley719 26 дней назад +1

      How many phones can they take, probably all.😮

    • @johnnyarcade5546
      @johnnyarcade5546 26 дней назад

      100%.

    • @Historyfreak-f7o
      @Historyfreak-f7o 25 дней назад +7

      Carry a dumb phone….

    • @Freesavh1776
      @Freesavh1776 24 дня назад +9

      Put all important info on micro SD and a spotless phone with just a couple of numbers on it. Make sure SD is hidden very well.

  • @scipher99
    @scipher99 26 дней назад +64

    TSA Agent: "Sir we have selected you for an enhanced search."
    Me: "Sure, so you want to inconvenience me? I have no problem being the most uncooperative and rudest person in existence."
    Consent to nothing and refuse everything. Also stop using biometrics to unlock your phone, use a password.

    • @dragonf1092
      @dragonf1092 26 дней назад +7

      Ask them are you conspiring against my rights?
      Are you depriving me of my constitutionally protected rights under color of law?

    • @dragonf1092
      @dragonf1092 26 дней назад +9

      When you get to court or sue bring criminal felony charges against the DA/prosecutor and all officers/agents involved in violation of Title 18 U.S.C. section §241 conspiracy against rights, Title 18 U.S.C. section §242 deprivation of rights under color of law,if they had no legal lawful valid search warrant, for conspiring against and depriving you of your supremacy clause, article 4 section 2 paragraph 1,4th amendment warrant clause,10th amendment nor prohibited by it to the states clause,14th amendment section 1 no state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the united states clause rights combined. Use fruit of the poisonous tree and exclusionary rule to have all their evidence they illegally obtained thrown out of the court.

    • @williamelewis464
      @williamelewis464 25 дней назад +1

      Passwords can be bypassed too, matter of fact a phone an be cracked without ever opening it regardless of OS

    • @Parasclepius
      @Parasclepius 24 дня назад

      Don't be rude, be aggressively flirtatious. Pick someone of the same sex, preferably the one with the bald head and sleeve tattos, and just lay into them thick. Tell them their eyes are the most beautiful you've ever seen. Tell them they have the most luscious lips in existence. If they walk away, tell them they have the best butt since JLo. Tell them exactly what you want to do to their butt in the most graphic terms you can. It's so much more fun simply than being rude. 😂

    • @donotneed2250
      @donotneed2250 23 дня назад +5

      ​@@williamelewis464, I use the pass-pattern and fingerprint. After the 5 time of the wrong finger the automatically locks out fingerprint reader. Then the correct pass-pattern will have to be entered. If not entered correctly you'll have to wait a specific time which gets longer each time until the phone will factory reset itself.

  • @josefmazzeo6628
    @josefmazzeo6628 22 дня назад +22

    Here's one solution - have a travel phone (a burner phone) when traveling via the airports or overseas. Leave your main phone at home, connected to your wifi. There are apps that allow you to screen share your phone and control it remotely. Set that up before leaving - make sure it works. On the burner phone, delete the remote control phone app before going through the airport coming and going. Re-install it on the other side. At least if they seize your phone, they don't have your main phone.

    • @yolyV-hg3uc
      @yolyV-hg3uc 21 день назад +2

      Good idea

    • @NDcompetitiveshooter
      @NDcompetitiveshooter 7 дней назад

      Or don't consent to the search to begin with. They need actual probable cause to obtain a warrant.

  • @brucel399
    @brucel399 25 дней назад +87

    A friend of mine was flying back into Denver after the Paris Olympics. He had a Homeland Officer ask for his phone. He told them politely, no thank you. HSI proceeded to take him to an interrogation room for further questioning. While in the room alone, he attempted to call his lawyer. The Homeland security people turned on a phone jammer to interrupt the call. His lawyer had heard enough to understand what was going on. He hurried out to Denver International Airport and was denied his right to see his client. The lawyer immediately called a federal judge he knew and got his client released from custody. Unfortunately the TSA IMMEDIATELY put my friend on the no-fly list. No he is trying to get that resolved.

    • @BrooklynBalla
      @BrooklynBalla 25 дней назад +7

      Why was he detained in the first place?

    • @KlaudiaShaefferr
      @KlaudiaShaefferr 25 дней назад +6

      @@BrooklynBallaI guess he’s trying to get that resolved as well

    • @brucel399
      @brucel399 24 дня назад +28

      @@BrooklynBalla he was detained because he told the Homeland security people no to searching his phone after they asked to see it.

    • @TWSmith42
      @TWSmith42 23 дня назад +13

      I heard there was no way off the no-fly list. Also, how does someone who is not wealthy afford the legal representation to confront such things? Using a burner phone for travel seems like a good idea.

    • @BrooklynBalla
      @BrooklynBalla 23 дня назад +10

      @@brucel399 That doesn’t make sense legally.They need some kind of suspicion that he is involved in criminal activity.Refusing to let them search his phone cannot be the basis since thats a 4th amendment right.Not saying I don’t believe it.Government does this nonsense all the time.

  • @Freesavh1776
    @Freesavh1776 24 дня назад +24

    Any intrusion of any government agency is a major problem. Terrifying words said by the government
    "I'm from the government, & I'm here to help." Our government has stopped caring about the best interest of its citizens a very long time ago. I put it around 1913 when the Aldridge Act was bullied through Congress creating The Federal Reserve and the IRS.

  • @Nightfighter82
    @Nightfighter82 26 дней назад +17

    If Geo fencing warrants are illegal, than checking your phone should be even more illegal without a warrant.

  • @dianarockwell6256
    @dianarockwell6256 26 дней назад +16

    The fourth amendment is trampled on hundreds of times every day in this country. Border patrol and TSA are one of the worst offenders. I would love to see the statistics of how much information they gather on these “random“ searches. My elderly mother who has a darker skin tone and black hair because she is part Indian, meeting native American, was always pulled aside for additional searches. She gets a little passive aggressive which she’s gotten worse as she gets older and they’re going around under her bra and around her bra in front of everyone standing in the lobby this is a very small airport where she lives that they don’t even keep people there when there’s no flights coming in, so she yells in front of everyone do you want me to take my blouse off too? And because of her dark hair color and dark skin color she was always randomly chosen. They got to where they knew who she was so they stopped. And yes if this were me, I would not invoke a fourth amendment because they don’t care about your fourth amendment or even your fifth amendment. I would invoke my sixth amendment because that guarantees me a lawyer for any questioning. And a lot of people don’t realize what the sixth amendment provides you. I’ve even seen people invoking it they have to explain it to police.

  • @andyvonbourske6405
    @andyvonbourske6405 25 дней назад +29

    the dea wanted to do a random search of my bag right in the little hall that links to the gate gate to the plane and that's after going through tsa security. They were trying to coerce me by saying if i didn't sign a consent form it will take them a while and i will miss my flight they then brought a k9 that apparently " alerted " on my bag. i told him he wasn't getting my consent we argued for about 15-20 minutes before they gave up. i couldn't believe they were actually doing that. after speaking with the stewardess she told me they only want your money and sometimes it's the tsa giving them tips about what they saw during a search. that was introduction to civil asset forfeiture, most people will argue with me that they can't do that because .......

    • @pasques
      @pasques 23 дня назад

      putin boy?

    • @Phillip-cw9xn
      @Phillip-cw9xn 23 дня назад +3

      The federal government as the new highwaymen of the roads and skies.
      STAND AND DELIVER CIVILIAN

    • @andyvonbourske6405
      @andyvonbourske6405 23 дня назад +3

      @@pasques putin boy ? do you actually think before you reply or do you just type whatever pops up in your head ?

    • @enmiredbythelazy4401
      @enmiredbythelazy4401 22 дня назад +3

      @@andyvonbourske6405 I was curious about that reply as well. You're somehow a "Putin boy" for not allow your rights to be trampled on? Guessing someone is off their meds. Great job standing up for your rights, it's not the first I've seen of this trend with the DEA.

    • @rickardstrom9305
      @rickardstrom9305 22 дня назад +2

      Did you by any chance had cash in your luggage? TSA and CPB/DEA, etc, are running a scam where TSA scan your luggage and then inform CPB/DEA. CPB/DEA then proceeds to do a civil asset forfeiture and you need to sue them to get it back. Good luck proving that your hard earned cash isn't dirty.

  • @russelbrown6275
    @russelbrown6275 25 дней назад +23

    Take out your SD card before going to the airport and keep it in your possession and do NOT let them know you even have it.

    • @embeddedtom
      @embeddedtom 21 день назад +1

      But make sure your phone is set up to store photos, messages, etc, on the uSD card. And if it wasn't set up already, don't forget to move all locally saved stuff to the uSD card.

    • @adamjl204
      @adamjl204 20 дней назад +2

      The juicy information typically sits in RAM (read access memory) which can't be moved to an external device. This data can be accessed so long as you haven't turned off your device before handing it over, even if you set a pin/password/etc. If they have a warrant - if possible, shut your phone off before it leaves your possession.

    • @jum5238
      @jum5238 19 дней назад

      But in a blank one, so they don't search for the one you've stashed.

  • @ligmasack9038
    @ligmasack9038 27 дней назад +22

    Don't forget that the Govt. has this delusion that you should have to explain why you are traveling with more than $10k in Cash, and if they don't like the reason then they seize the Cash!

    • @williamelewis464
      @williamelewis464 25 дней назад +3

      More than 10k will get you questioned in 100% of airports and border crossings world wide. There isn’t a single border where that is legal

    • @Maybe-So
      @Maybe-So 24 дня назад +7

      ANY amount of money is subject to "civil asset forfeiture" and extremely difficult to get back, even if flying within the country. DEA will take it all. They are animals.

    • @birdnird
      @birdnird 21 день назад +2

      @@Maybe-SoMany businesses in airports no longer accept cash, it’s all card/PayPal/ApplePay, etc. so there is now supposedly “no need” to carry cash while traveling. The entirety of Austin Bergstrom International Airport is cash-free. You would starve with a hundred dollar bill in hand. It does not bode well for the future

    • @lcole7501
      @lcole7501 21 день назад

      ​@Maybe-So you're so right. DOJ has seized more that 1 billion dollars from people in a single year.

    • @bryanbeattie3270
      @bryanbeattie3270 19 дней назад

      @@birdnird I only carry cash . The day it all goes digital is the day I stop being a productive member of society. I do not support socialism.

  • @chelin7023
    @chelin7023 23 дня назад +5

    I like to aid law enforcement with their duties; that being said, abuse or lack of proper training should not be part of our culture. Thank you for this important video.

  • @user-ov3cw8iy2c
    @user-ov3cw8iy2c 29 дней назад +20

    If you’re in the situation and you still have possession of your phone before you hand it over, wipe it clean

    • @williamelewis464
      @williamelewis464 25 дней назад +5

      lol it can be recovered even if you wipe it, also just an FYI attempting to do this is a crime and is chargeable. Please don’t follow this horrible advice

    • @enmiredbythelazy4401
      @enmiredbythelazy4401 22 дня назад +2

      @@williamelewis464 How, precisely, can they charge you with a crime for wiping your own phone? This is nonsense, unless a judge has issued an order to preserve evidence, you have every right to wipe your phone. If you didn't, every time you deleted a photo or doc you'd be in violation. The only exception to this is government equipment, which has a requirement of retention for a period depending on jurisdiction and classification.

    • @UtubeH8tr
      @UtubeH8tr 22 дня назад +3

      Lol tell Killary hinton that.

    • @Scleavers
      @Scleavers 21 день назад

      ​@@enmiredbythelazy4401if you wipe it DURING a detention, you'll easily catch that charge even if the phone wasn't demanded to be handed over. Will that charge stick in court is another story.

    • @NDcompetitiveshooter
      @NDcompetitiveshooter 7 дней назад

      @@enmiredbythelazy4401 I think a notice to preserve evidence is in civil matters. They charge for criminal destruction of evidence all the time without a prior order to preserve.

  • @phlodel
    @phlodel 22 дня назад +9

    Constitutional rights are a subscription service. If you can't afford a good attorney, you don't have any rights.

  • @patmcbride9853
    @patmcbride9853 23 дня назад +10

    When I watched a series about Canadian border security, I was floored that they could demand your unlocked phone so they could take it to a room and rifle trough it like searching your home computer without a warrant.
    Sad that the USA is doing similar things.

    • @KiwiCatherineJemma
      @KiwiCatherineJemma 18 дней назад

      When travelling overseas into USA or Canada especially, perhaps a good idea to have done a "reset to factory" or similar clean wipe of your phone beforehand, and just re-entered the handful of phone numbers or contact details you might need just before travelling. Like flight info, hotel booking, relatives contact details etc. Or as several folks have suggested , just buying a cheap basic, dumb/old persons basic-brick,, or "burner" phone, for use while travelling. Be sure to have not even signed into normal emails etc. I think Android system phones demand a gmail account to activate initially, so set up a new email address just for that perhaps ? But hey, I'm no phone expert, I'm just a RUclips watcher !

    • @MoonbeameSmith
      @MoonbeameSmith 2 дня назад +1

      @@KiwiCatherineJemma easier to just have a "travel phone"

  • @pistonpilot
    @pistonpilot 25 дней назад +11

    The story's moral is that a citizen of the United States of America cannot be denied entry to their country.

    • @timrupp2944
      @timrupp2944 22 дня назад +1

      Yes they can. These federal agents do not have to follow the usual rules. They can hold you without reason indefinitely and you have no rights as you would if you're arrested by police for example

    • @ryandgarland
      @ryandgarland 21 день назад

      Both true. A citizen is not supposed to be denied entry. But...they can "suspect" you are a terrorist, which tramples over all of our "rights".

    • @pistonpilot
      @pistonpilot 21 день назад

      @@ryandgarland Why do I care? They suspect everyone. I don't talk to the police.

  • @wigenite
    @wigenite 28 дней назад +19

    with the growth of 2fa apps that require phones, this is even more scary getting locked out of accounts because they government stole your phone.

    • @lohphat
      @lohphat 26 дней назад

      Regardless of the government's behavior, all 2FA auth methods should be backed up regularly to another device.

    • @MoonbeameSmith
      @MoonbeameSmith 26 дней назад +2

      What about phones that have your tickets and credit cards and itineraries on? Phones are more than phones these dayz

    • @lohphat
      @lohphat 26 дней назад +1

      @@MoonbeameSmith all those things can exist in their physical form as a backup.
      Because tap to pay is basically duplicating the card onto your phone. I keep the original cards at home as a backup I only carry two actual payment cards as a backup in case my phone disappears.
      Your phone should only be used as a cache backup of other things which exist elsewhere. It's not permanent it should always be viewed as expendable.
      I print out my itinerary and boarding passes and take them along even though I usually never use them.
      Phones are a convenience only. They are not central to our lives. They're just tools.

  • @user-zh6td1gn2m
    @user-zh6td1gn2m 27 дней назад +26

    when traveling. always wipe the phone before crossing border! factory reset is the best! then when you get through the security rape point! you can always reload the backup copy you saved!

    • @williamelewis464
      @williamelewis464 25 дней назад +3

      Factory reset will not get rid of the data, even if you wiped it 50 times that data is still recoverable

    • @johnborges5938
      @johnborges5938 24 дня назад +2

      @@williamelewis464- Not correct.

    • @Vefyoutubecensorfutub
      @Vefyoutubecensorfutub 24 дня назад

      NSA. They already know everything. Patriot Act. Google , Meta, Apple. They have all the info.

    • @bunnybootsink9258
      @bunnybootsink9258 23 дня назад +3

      Wiping the phone data depends on how it is stored on the device. Newer phones have the option to be encrypted. If the data is encrypted, a factory reset will be enough to do a near permanent wipe. If it isn't encrypted, than you want to run a wiping software to make sure it can't be accessed.

    • @johnborges5938
      @johnborges5938 23 дня назад +1

      @@bunnybootsink9258 - I stand corrected. I was thinking only of iPhones, which have used encryption since 2009. Android first required use of encrypted storage with Android 10 in 2019. So, in brief: if you have an iPhone or an Android newer than about 2019, a reset is sufficient. If you have an Android phone from 2019 or before, it depends.

  • @PlottingTheDownfall
    @PlottingTheDownfall 25 дней назад +9

    "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
    they key word is "unreasonable" is searching an electronic device unreasonable? I would say yes, unless there is probable cause that the phone contains material evidence of a crime having been committed, or a LEO can articulate reasonable suspicion that a crime has or is about to be committed.

    • @infinity4evr
      @infinity4evr 22 дня назад

      I was looking for this. The information on the phone is the same as the information on paper. Both are protected.

  • @ZXLMaster
    @ZXLMaster Месяц назад +18

    Your mobile device serves as the digital equivalent of your essential documentation. If its contents were to be printed, it would equate to the information stored in multiple four-drawer filing cabinets. To ensure the security of your device and safeguard your sensitive information, it is crucial to employ robust digital security measures, particularly when traveling. ❤

  • @theofficialsoldierthatreviews
    @theofficialsoldierthatreviews 26 дней назад +5

    Man I need a lawyer like you, I was attacked by a Dr physically, had my life threatened numerous times, and nothing happened. If that was me attacking a Dr I’d be in prison…

  • @gabby8388
    @gabby8388 23 дня назад +6

    That is crazy, I travel in my vehicle. I have my 4th amendment when I’m traveling in my vehicle. I’m telling you I will go to jail before they get my phone.

  • @pistonpilot
    @pistonpilot 25 дней назад +15

    "I don't answer questions. I invoke MY 5th amendment right to remain silent."

    • @cindyjohns6222
      @cindyjohns6222 21 день назад +2

      Yes, we sure can do that.
      If you happen to be in Louisiana invoking our 5th Amendment right with any law enforcement agent or agents..
      At this time is when the handcuffs come out, rights are read, it's the...
      " hehe haha hoho. It's off to jail we go."
      I'm not even kidding around..

  • @flashoflight8160
    @flashoflight8160 21 день назад +4

    How about some practical advice on how to lock our phones down while on the way to the USA? Can they physically force me to unlock via face ID or fingerprint? Should I disable biometrics while on the plane? What happens when I refuse to give them the PIN?

    • @ajkmsteph
      @ajkmsteph 6 дней назад +1

      Can’t force you to provide password as it requires you to release information in your brain which is protected ( equal to you talking and incriminating yourself) but they can easily force you to show your face to phone or press fingerprint to open. It’s like they can get fingerprints or blood but they can’t force you to talk.

  • @AssertLiberty
    @AssertLiberty 22 дня назад +7

    These criminals with badges need to be under the jailhouse

  • @geekchameleon
    @geekchameleon 22 дня назад +5

    Since when do we give our government agents and agencies rights which we the people do not possess?

  • @rickbii63
    @rickbii63 27 дней назад +18

    welcome to the free country.

    • @taitraining3055
      @taitraining3055 22 дня назад

      to the land of the free.........when it suits them

  • @CanyonSteve-z8j
    @CanyonSteve-z8j 12 дней назад +1

    You mentioned that the exception is intended for luggage, contraband , and cash. Could you expand on what you mean by cash and it's prohibition?

  • @LauraViñaletBrown
    @LauraViñaletBrown Месяц назад +11

    Great video David Tarras!

  • @frans_d7989
    @frans_d7989 10 дней назад

    I was planning on having a holiday in Dallas but with what you have said about the strong arm tactics of your border force I have now reconsidered and cancelled my plans and going to Canada instead. Thank you for your video and the warning.

  • @pistonpilot
    @pistonpilot 25 дней назад +12

    Since when has traveling been a "privilege?"

    • @I_Am_Your_Problem
      @I_Am_Your_Problem 24 дня назад

      Entering another country is a privilege. Don't believe me? Don't answer any questions. Don't complete a declarations document. Watch how fast you are turned right back around.

    • @pistonpilot
      @pistonpilot 24 дня назад +3

      @@I_Am_Your_Problem He's talking about the USA, and so am I. Pay attention.

    • @thetallmanspodcastreacts
      @thetallmanspodcastreacts 20 дней назад

      Air travel through commercial airports in the federal corporation, the United States, is a privilege, unfortunately. Name one commercial airport that isn't under Federal control of the United States. The Commerce Clause in the Constitution is abused daily. You have the right to take a private jet or learn to fly your own General Aviation plane from a private airport; there still a bit of "privilege" in those areas, too. The crazy part is that Americans could cripple the air travel industry if we boycotted based on the invasive practices that went into overdrive with the so-called Patriot Act, but most people don't want to inconvenience themselves.

    • @pistonpilot
      @pistonpilot 20 дней назад

      @@thetallmanspodcastreacts That depends upon your calling yourself a 14th Amendment Subject Citizen with privileges and immunities. I have rights. Upon entering the United States I do not check the box for US Citizen. I am a Citizen of the State. They usually cross that out and enter US Citizen. That's their opinion.

    • @thetallmanspodcastreacts
      @thetallmanspodcastreacts 20 дней назад

      @@pistonpilot I am aware of the “US citizenship” created by Congress and the 14th Amendment and State Citizenships. I should have asked what you meant by “traveling”. I presumed that you meant air travel. Are you saying that you are able to move within those Federal airports without adhering to the “laws” and rules that control how those Federal airports operate? For example, when you assert your Fourth Amendment protection, do they still let you proceed to your flight? When you return to the United States from another country is a different story because they cannot deny entry to an American citizen of one of the 50 States.

  • @douggodfrey6521
    @douggodfrey6521 26 дней назад +5

    Freedom &
    the Constitution
    were a Quaint
    Idea.

  • @pistonpilot
    @pistonpilot 25 дней назад +8

    There is no exception to any amendment.

  • @Phillip-cw9xn
    @Phillip-cw9xn 23 дня назад +7

    40 million invders let in and tnhey concentrate on citizens returning's cell phones and such.

    • @Scleavers
      @Scleavers 21 день назад

      The SCOTUS should rule those 4th exceptions as inadmisible, based on the number of unlawful crossings alone

    • @stormand
      @stormand 16 дней назад

      I’m guessing you wouldn’t complain if they were racial profiling and only seizing the phones of brown people.

  • @Parasclepius
    @Parasclepius 24 дня назад +4

    Carry a clean Pixel converted to Graphine OS. Never use biometrics. Encrypt everything with strong encryption.

    • @josefmazzeo6628
      @josefmazzeo6628 21 день назад

      Swipe patterns are most secure especially if they are complex.

  • @ajkmsteph
    @ajkmsteph 6 дней назад

    A key helpful fact that this missed was they can get a facial recognition or finger print to open your phone but they can’t force you to provide a password protected phone …. So safest way to protect phone is use password to protect opening phone Napa facial recognition or finger scan.

  • @AlexeiTetenov
    @AlexeiTetenov 18 дней назад +1

    Thank you for sharing!

  • @blkmoon5596
    @blkmoon5596 Месяц назад +14

    This is happening more and more. Mail your phone home do not bring it with you when you come back into the country.

    • @martinbrink6711
      @martinbrink6711 22 дня назад +1

      No? What a dumb idea. What is the point of having a mobile communication device if it is stuck in the mail? Back up and protect the device. Do not provide credentials to authorities. Apple users can remote wipe their device on command. Retain an attorney and follow up with AGGRESSIVE Litigation. Don't cower and hide. Live your life and fight when necessary.

    • @martinbrink6711
      @martinbrink6711 22 дня назад +3

      Also, have you ever mailed anything valuable from a non-us postal carrier? You're likely to never see it again.

    • @phantomtr1
      @phantomtr1 9 дней назад

      Land of the free. Every citizen is guilty and needs to prove innocence.
      Enjoy, this is the result of corporate and government bootlickers for decades and bad Congress and judges upholding the theft of our rights.

  • @user-rw311
    @user-rw311 26 дней назад +5

    What exactly are they looking for. How could they take a persons phone especially while traveling you need that phone for banking for uber for maps for so many things you need your phone for when traveling. America is a police state for sure. The Patriot Act was all part of the plan.

  • @paulsander5433
    @paulsander5433 21 день назад +3

    I heard once that international terminals at airports legally are not part of the United States; they're equivalent to international waters. Is this true? If so, has anyone brought up the subject of piracy when their stuff is confiscated at the airport? Maybe even state-sponsored piracy? Especially when they confiscate cash?

  • @adamrossen5534
    @adamrossen5534 20 дней назад +1

    Wow, this is very surprising information.

  • @glencuda
    @glencuda 23 дня назад +3

    What public threat could my text messages be?

  • @pyreneesfarm7818
    @pyreneesfarm7818 20 дней назад

    I have a troubling story I flew from SLC UT to Washington DC, for a visit. I checked my bag, and before my flight, I was searched, then let go. At my layover in Chicago, I was searched AGAIN as I waited for my connecting flight (Which I almost missed BTW). In Washington DC, i was exiting the plane and was searched again before I got my bag. My return flight from Washington DC, I still had the twitch. I was searched twice on my way home, all because I have a twitch. I will never fly commercially again EVER.

  • @dragonf1092
    @dragonf1092 26 дней назад +12

    A cellphone and suitcase is a citizens effects and therefore protected under the 4th amendment warrant clause.

    • @williamelewis464
      @williamelewis464 25 дней назад

      No…not how that works but I understand why you are misled.

    • @dragonf1092
      @dragonf1092 25 дней назад +1

      @@williamelewis464 try actually reading the supremacy clause, article 4 section 2 paragraph 1,1st amendment,4th amendment,10th amendment,14th amendment section 1 of the constitution of the united states of America supreme law of the land.

    • @dragonf1092
      @dragonf1092 25 дней назад +4

      @@williamelewis464 the right of the PEOPLE to be SECURE in their PERSONS, HOUSES, PAPERS, EFFECTS against unreasonable searches and seizures ""SHALL NOT BE VIOLATED "" and NO WARRANT SHALL ISSUE BUT UPON PROBABLE CAUSE
      The only reasonable search and seizure is only done so with a legal lawful valid search warrant. Law enforcement agencies have no legal lawful constitutional authority or jurisdiction whatsoever to do a damn thing but get a legal lawful search warrant. And that is the supreme law of the land overrides and overrules all other laws. As well as the 14th amendment section 1 NO STATE SHALL MAKE OR ENFORCE ANY LAW WHICH SHALL ABRIDGE THE PRIVILEGES OR IMMUNITIES OF CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES clause.

    • @dragonf1092
      @dragonf1092 25 дней назад +5

      @@williamelewis464 law enforcement and the courts (justice department)have been operating illegally unconstitutionally for the past 100 years.

    • @dragonf1092
      @dragonf1092 25 дней назад

      @@williamelewis464 the only one mislead is you drinking the communist/Nazi brainwashing indoctrination Kool aid.

  • @crazysquirrel9425
    @crazysquirrel9425 26 дней назад +4

    No search and seizure warrant or exigent circumstances, then it is unconstitutional for them to even TOUCH your stuff, let alone SEARCH your stuff.
    There aren't supposed to be exceptions with respect to citizens.
    X-Rays and dogs should be OK, but not HUMAN HANDS touching anything.
    Best to use a burner phone so they have nothing to look at.

    • @williamelewis464
      @williamelewis464 25 дней назад

      They can hold you for 72 hrs without charges, it takes about 3 hours to clone a phone and it’s entire memory, also hard drives can be recovered so even if you wipe it, that data is still there.

    • @crazysquirrel9425
      @crazysquirrel9425 25 дней назад

      @@williamelewis464 Cloning a phone may not help them if it is encrypted properly.
      No, hard drives CAN be sufficiently erased. Just ask Hillary Clinton....
      Many SSD mfr's will give you a wiping program. Sets all levels of all cells to 1's. You do NOT want zero's on SSD's. Zeroes are for platter drives and still you need to do magnetic underwriting after the 7 pass DOD wipe.
      Of course tossing either into a blast furnace destroys everything.
      Yes they CAN hold you for 72 hours but most times it is just a scant few hours. And not do it regularly either.
      It doesn't take 72 hours to run a check on anyone anymore. It used to take up to 72 hours to run checks long ago.
      Cops share a national database. Why do you think they have laptops in their cruisers?
      More than just an ID check...

    • @enmiredbythelazy4401
      @enmiredbythelazy4401 22 дня назад

      @@williamelewis464 There are programs that overwrite the data so its' not recoverable. Once it's been overwritten with random 1's and 0's a few times, it's clean.

  • @RichardsWorld
    @RichardsWorld 27 дней назад +9

    In 2015 one of my friends was arrested in the USA. I was in the Dominican Republic at the time. 2 days later I flew to Atlanta. 2 HSI agents flew from Boston to Atlanta to specifically intercept me and search my phone and computers. And bring me to a secure place to interigate me. They are using that as evidence against me. We one a motion to suppress, but later the judge reversed his decision.

    • @williamelewis464
      @williamelewis464 25 дней назад

      So why are you giving people horrible advice?

  • @SiegfriedEmme
    @SiegfriedEmme 7 дней назад

    support the Institute for Justice. they are sueing the federal government for all this unconstitutional abuse

  • @mike9119
    @mike9119 26 дней назад +4

    Is this happening to US Citizens coming back into the USA even though they were born in the country that just visited and became a US citizen?

    • @williamelewis464
      @williamelewis464 25 дней назад +1

      It happens to anybody of interest, regardless of who they are or what they claim.

    • @timrupp2944
      @timrupp2944 22 дня назад

      I was born here and it happened to me

  • @middleburg11
    @middleburg11 15 дней назад

    Encryption helps a lot, but make sure it's on sd card😮 or factory reset or sd lock..

  • @JoelLessing
    @JoelLessing 21 день назад +2

    All phones should be equipped with an entirely removable memory card and sim so people can either upload their card to a password protected cloud storage and retrieve the data after arriving at their destination. The physical phone would simply be an empty hulk.

  • @stevesmith9151
    @stevesmith9151 27 дней назад +5

    Lock your phone and refuse to unlock it, tell these uniformed criminals to pound sand, call a lawyer.

    • @charlescarmichael1124
      @charlescarmichael1124 26 дней назад +1

      That's what I came to say.

    • @williamelewis464
      @williamelewis464 25 дней назад

      They can hold you for 72 hrs without charges, and it only take about 3 hrs to clone a 1TB phone even if you wipe it and lock it, password protect the sim or any of the other BS people who claim to be in IT say on here.

    • @stevesmith9151
      @stevesmith9151 25 дней назад +2

      @@williamelewis464 so don't take your phone, mail it ahead to your destination.

    • @adamjl204
      @adamjl204 20 дней назад

      ​@@stevesmith9151all international mail is subject to search and I'm sure they'd pull the same BS & claim electronic devices can also be searched.

  • @timinwsac
    @timinwsac 26 дней назад +2

    They are gonna seize your phone download the contents and then give you a ring back when they're finished?

    • @williamelewis464
      @williamelewis464 25 дней назад +1

      They won’t be letting you leave while this happens.

  • @jeffreyhowll1392
    @jeffreyhowll1392 23 дня назад +2

    Are you allowed to use force to protect your rights?

    • @BabsKaz
      @BabsKaz 22 дня назад +1

      Second amendment.😊

  • @DontCryAboutIt
    @DontCryAboutIt 21 день назад +1

    People with family members born in different countries almost always get sent to secondary for no other reason. Secondary typically asks you to verify the passport information and sends you on your way. Sometimes they don't even ask to verify, I'm guessing they review the transit history and realize it's a waste of time.

  • @magicbyspaz
    @magicbyspaz 8 дней назад

    The way to stop invasion, have your phone on a passcode/password then they need a warrant to get into it.

  • @hermenutic
    @hermenutic 25 дней назад +4

    Is bringing a burner phone with no information on it a way to avoid this?

    • @ultraret
      @ultraret 25 дней назад +2

      Make sure it has some "decoy" information so it seems that is your real phone and they dont suspect you just wiped it to hide something

    • @hermenutic
      @hermenutic 25 дней назад

      @@ultraret
      I don't travel and wouldn't encounter this problem it was just a thought that came to me if your private business is automatically government business.

    • @williamelewis464
      @williamelewis464 25 дней назад

      Nope

    • @ultraret
      @ultraret 25 дней назад +1

      @@hermenutic I understand any statements said herein are purely hypothetical and not an actual act or intention, we plea the fifth.

  • @gregvisioninfosoft
    @gregvisioninfosoft 24 дня назад +2

    I can understand how this stated rationale could be for NON citizens who are have past known convictions. But its insane that us citizens already on us soil get hassled. Everything you have said shows they are merely 'fishing' which is illegal.

  • @scott1099
    @scott1099 26 дней назад +45

    just have an illegal immigrant carry it through - no Gov agency will ever check them

  • @user-tc9ws8ph6i
    @user-tc9ws8ph6i 25 дней назад +2

    That’s crazy a lot of people have banking information on their cell phones meaning they can access your information and wipeout your accounts if just 1 officer is corrupt!! Or if you’re on business out of town could cause a person to lose their jobs can’t see how that’s a good idea!

  • @estherrayos
    @estherrayos 26 дней назад +2

    If you committed not crime there is no reason that should be happening

    • @juliana.x0x0
      @juliana.x0x0 25 дней назад +1

      Ok f course it SHOULDNT-but it IS happening.

  • @imcacklinghere8693
    @imcacklinghere8693 21 день назад +1

    Right here where I live! Love that. I am a Fort Lauderdale resident for 40 years.

  • @TXDude
    @TXDude 25 дней назад +2

    So who are these groups being targeted in mid-2024? At which air and sea ports does this sort of thing happen?

  • @timbookedtwo2375
    @timbookedtwo2375 19 дней назад

    what protections do travellers who are not us citizens have when entering the us?

  • @mrwizworks
    @mrwizworks 2 дня назад

    Disable biometrics, set a password, and even if with a warrant, tell them to pound sand.

  • @BW12149
    @BW12149 9 дней назад

    It’s amazing to me that the airport is one of the very few places we can go to that as soon as we enter the doors we are automatically deprived of all constitutional rights, we are assumed to be criminally or terrorist minded, and that we must fully and immediately obey and cooperate with fellow Americans who have been given massive authority by the government. Those miserable TSA agents seem to enjoy harassing fellow Americans under the guise of aircraft safety. I try not to fly. If I can’t drive it in 8 hours it ain’t worth going to. Wife and I did go on a cruise to Alaska in 2019, and it was all I could do not to punch out couple of TSA thugs. What George Bush did in creating the “ Homeland Security Agency” was unleash untold amount of anguish on ordinary American citizens exercising rights to travel and be secure from searches and seizures.

  • @ShawnBrady-fd8mk
    @ShawnBrady-fd8mk 25 дней назад +2

    Why I haven't flown yet this century.

  • @retro93277
    @retro93277 26 дней назад +4

    backup your phone to the cloud, Wipe it before traveling , Restore after you land .

    • @walterroche8192
      @walterroche8192 26 дней назад +2

      You do know that a simple wipe doesn't delete it fully & a lack of data is, in itself, probable cause.
      Just have a burner phone with only emergency numbers on it.

    • @retro93277
      @retro93277 26 дней назад

      @@walterroche8192burner for the win

    • @Trish.Norman
      @Trish.Norman 26 дней назад +1

      @@walterroche8192 How is a lack of data probable cause?

    • @williamelewis464
      @williamelewis464 25 дней назад

      @@Trish.Normanbecause it shows intent to hide. Also your phone can be broken into and cloned without touching it.

    • @BrooklynBalla
      @BrooklynBalla 25 дней назад +3

      @@williamelewis464 Intent to hide what exactly?My personal data is mine and I’ll “hide it” as I please.

  • @Don.Challenger
    @Don.Challenger 19 дней назад

    So, is the origin of this exception to the 4th amendment protections (involving the entry of people and their possessions at the border of the USA) due to the lack of any opportunity by federal officials or authority to have had control over the pre acquisition flow of commerce in material, products and services (and the transactions enabling that ownership) in the pre border crossing international realm? Presumably, they don't do this at border exit only entry because prior to exit they did have control of pre acquisition activity through commerce regulation and state and federal law.

  • @WarpedTrekker
    @WarpedTrekker 18 дней назад

    Easy thing to do when they ask for phone. Perform an immediate wipe of all info. It's all backed up in the cloud. But they get nothing and the phone is set to factory defaults and wiped. I'm prepared to do this with all my electronics including laptop too

  • @AlexeiTetenov
    @AlexeiTetenov 18 дней назад

    Keep Pressing!!!

  • @joehopper3720
    @joehopper3720 21 день назад +1

    It's not- "Don't help the government do their job"!
    Believe it or not: the government's 'job' is not to render any American insecure, in any capacity; rather, precisely the opposite is the obligatory duty, by oath of affirmation, of all government officials.
    "Don't pay your government to do a job; then, consent to the sabotage of the task you've paid them to do." -
    This is akin to hiring the pool guy to clean your pool; you go on vacay, and come home to a party in your back yard & a dirty pool; then paying the guy for a job well done. Only we're talking about the most successful nation on the planet, not a pool, and the destruction of the founding principles which enabled that success.

  • @user7897
    @user7897 14 дней назад

    You don't have to talk to anybody. Tell them you don't answer questions.

  • @Crayfish-
    @Crayfish- 19 дней назад +1

    In the Miranda Rights / They ( any Disciplinarian ) states that You have Right to an Attorney at All Stages of your ( or the )
    " Proceedings " !
    Do you Know if there is Law or " Any Cases " where a Detainee, Excetra Can Demand That their Own Attorneys Can Be there
    " At the Warrant Hearing " ? ! / I believe that " If " the Government " can " Go Behind someone's Back " to Request a Warrant then
    the Detainee Ought to have a Right to Representation ! / Yes I know that the Government " Would find That " Inconvenient "
    and I can understand that they may " Claim " Urgency " in a Situation, and sometimes there actually is !

  • @Laudon1228
    @Laudon1228 22 дня назад

    “Seeing” a person’s cell phone to me implies looking at the physical object, not the data on it. Obtaining a person’s permission to go through the personal data seems to me a separate issue.
    One of my concerns in this situation is that as a woman, my personal safety even beyond the airport is in question. Bad actors are drawn to positions of authority so they can misuse it. Have there been any cases of TSA, (etc.) personnel using personal information on people’s cell phones to victimize them?

  • @mikekolczynski5665
    @mikekolczynski5665 27 дней назад +9

    With the boarders wide open? Seems ironic.

  • @billbaggans1799
    @billbaggans1799 17 дней назад

    TSA "randomly" checked " my phone going through security at Bradly international on my to Philly. What was that all about?

  • @Asscofoldcrows
    @Asscofoldcrows 20 дней назад

    What concerns me; I as a traveler have to have government ID and other information, but the current administration is allowing illegal immigrants to go in the airport and travel without ANY ID whatsoever and travel as they want.

  • @princessbearpoker
    @princessbearpoker 20 дней назад

    All I do is study law study for the bar. Watch cram exam videos, look up case precedent if they get into my phone they're gonna learn something or blow a fuse.😂

  • @RebMordecai
    @RebMordecai 20 дней назад

    How about carrying a "backup phone" to surrender to them. Will they strip search for additional phones?

  • @dragonf1092
    @dragonf1092 26 дней назад +1

    Probable cause in the 4th amendment text is only to get a legal lawful valid warrant. Consent exists nowhere in the 4th amendment warrant clause, therefore consent is no exception to the warrant clause under the constitution of the united states of America supreme law of the land.

  • @Scleavers
    @Scleavers 21 день назад +1

    9:38 imagine that, finding probable cause on a seizure that started without probable cause.

  • @kingscres
    @kingscres 20 дней назад

    We need an app which allows you, when the phone is locked, to enter a code which wipes the phone. So when asked to unlock the phone, or provide the code, that number is keyed in instead. Afterwards phone can be restored from backup. It would be useful in various situations. Some one I know was mugged and phone stolen. Muggers made him key in his unlock code before they left.

  • @CZpersi
    @CZpersi 19 дней назад

    Cell phones often contain access to online banking. Also, phones are increasingly essential for traveling - contactless payments, service and ticket reservations in apps, etc. Getting your phone seized equals to your wallet and all IDs being stolen. It could leave you stranded.

  • @MysticAbba
    @MysticAbba 15 дней назад

    One time I spent 4 hours in MIA because of this garbage. I was extremely cold, thirsty and hungry.

  • @LuigiLongfellow
    @LuigiLongfellow 26 дней назад +4

    Every single time I travel I'm chosen for "random" extra screening. Pretty funny how they say they scrutinize individuals and for security purposes they require extra screening but I'm as average joe as they get except I'm large, tall, slightly darker complexion, thick eyebrows with a sort of ethnically ambiguous look. I think bc they can't single out my ethnicity is why 100% of the time when I fly I'm singled out for further screening.

    • @BabsKaz
      @BabsKaz 22 дня назад +1

      Facial recognition. All about control compliance and surveillance.

  • @scj643
    @scj643 25 дней назад +1

    They wouldn't easily be able to extract all the data out of my phone. If you have an iPhone set up a backup password with iTunes. There is no way to reset it without either the current password or wiping the phone.

  • @pyreneesfarm7818
    @pyreneesfarm7818 20 дней назад

    I hold that if an LEO wants to see something, it is for the purpose of detecting or creating a criminal complaint because the officer you see is part of the "PROSECUTION TEAM", the smile the same way a wolf smiles at a sheep before lunch. If no, that is a problem.

  • @Don.Challenger
    @Don.Challenger 19 дней назад

    Now, if I were travelling internationally, crossing not just borders but also legal, judicial, jurisdictional, political and cultural boundaries (do we only fear the US government and its officials?), I'd use my separate travel phone and travel devices which have been sanitized with their contents triaged to the bare essentials for my current travel needs. (When going to the Caribbean I don't generally pack and carry my alpine climbing gear - I leave that at home or rent at destination.) Do you suggest that to your clients before giving them contact information for your associated (or referred) foreign legal firms at their travel destinations?

  • @dragonf1092
    @dragonf1092 26 дней назад +3

    There are no exceptions under the 4th amendment rights whatsoever. Our rights are inalienable rights.
    Inalienable
    Cannot be taken away from or given away by the possessor.

    • @timrupp2944
      @timrupp2944 22 дня назад

      There are exceptions when crossing the border into the country

  • @EverettVinzant
    @EverettVinzant 22 дня назад +2

    First, I’d like them to explain what exactly information on a cell phone is illegal or contraband. I could have plans for firearms, explosives, drug recipes, etc. That information is neither illegal nor contraband AND is widely available in the U.S. (Poor Man’s James Bond (Vol 1-4), Grandads wonderful book of Chemistry, yes Anarchists Cookbook). Second, I do information security for a living. If there WERE “illegal or contraband” information, no, the TSA wouldn’t find it. I’m sorry, they may be the government, but the individual would still have to have the skill. And I know they don’t have it…
    Why?
    Because of their 50% failure rate at detecting easy things like firearms, explosives, and other contraband (anyone remember when a TSA agent claimed he saw BitCoins in someone’s bag)?
    Also, because I train people in information security, and detecting these things. I know what they know, and I know what they don’t know.
    And no, I’m mot talking James Bond level stuff.

  • @rickardstrom9305
    @rickardstrom9305 22 дня назад +1

    Companies have informed us about this for quite some time now. Don't bring company phones or laptops through US customs. Leave them at home and pick up a loan
    phone and/or laptop at the local office.
    Only an idiot would trust US airport authorities not to leak company information to security agencies and/or US competitors. The silly part is that the local offices have access to all the data through encrypted communication that, to my knowledge, can not be tapped.

  • @larryjanson4011
    @larryjanson4011 25 дней назад +1

    all the more reason to ship your items via a freight service not have the airlines touch it or carry it on your person.

  • @oreste6076
    @oreste6076 15 дней назад

    4th. us citizens only or tourists too

  • @T_Le
    @T_Le 12 дней назад

    Glad my phone has maintenance mode.

  • @NETWizzJbirk
    @NETWizzJbirk 26 дней назад +1

    Just don’t give them your phone. It’s clear it’s not a threat to the flight being a cellphone, so that’s all they need to know

  • @Nightfighter82
    @Nightfighter82 26 дней назад

    Keep a pin code on your phone. Keep it not easy to figure out. Watch what Wifi access points you connect to. Make sure your phone pin code is different from app pin codes.

    • @williamelewis464
      @williamelewis464 25 дней назад

      Sim Pins don’t work, they can be bypassed too. Also your phone can be copied in an empty room without being touched.

  • @Damariobros
    @Damariobros 16 дней назад

    Fully shut off your phone when you are at and past security, do not turn it back on until you are in the air, and shut it back down when you land and until you are out of the airport! Shutting it down will disable biometrics and clear all encryption keys from memory. Use a strong passcode, at least 12 digits OR at least 10 characters w/ a complex passcode (capitalization, letters, numbers, symbols, and high entropy). With a sufficiently strong passcode, and from a cold boot of the phone, it is currently _impossible_ to break into most modern phones without being told the passcode!
    Although it is better than nothing, do not be content with just using the cop button. Even with biometrics disabled, if you do not shut down the phone, encryption keys are still loaded into memory and can be hacked with specialized machines that law enforcement has.
    If you do not shut it down and you do not use the cop button to lock biometrics, the cops physically forcing your finger onto the sensor or holding the phone to your face to scan it is not prohibited by the fourth amendment, PERIOD. This exception was explicitly carved by SCOTUS.
    Stay safe and protect your right to privacy!