LIVE Depp v Heard VERDICT IS READY!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 31 май 2022
- #amberheard
#DeppVHeard #JohnnyDepp
Become a member -
ruclips.net/channel/UCxAH...
Amber Heard's witness list: www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit...
Johnny Depp's witness list: www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit...
🔴 Do you or someone you know need to speak to a real lawyer about a case? Or do you find yourself needing legal advice? Please reach out to our firm and we will make sure to answer your questions or find someone who can. Our consultations are always free and confidential. You can call our firm at (727)441-9030 or email us at lawyeryouknow@gmail.com.
✅ For business inquiries contact me at lawyeryouknow@gmail.com
✅ Let's connect: www.tragoslaw.com/
Twitter - @tragoslaw
Instagram - /tragoslaw
Facebook - /tragoslaw
TikTok - /tragoslaw
✅ Join our email list here - bit.ly/33lV3Mb
Get your Lawyer You Know merch here - bit.ly/LYKMerch
🔴 NOT LEGAL ADVICE
Intro & Outro Music: DOLYJJVS2W8MGNFM 
Развлечения
Johnny TOLD the world. And the world heard him. May those in need be heard and find healing.
Get it heard him?
It has been healing for me to see him so.
heaven helped!
This wasn't a trial of Man v Woman, it was a case between Depp v Heard. This is a win for victims of DV regardless of gender.
Why is she not looking at the jurors now??? Instead, she's hiding behind her hair !!
This was also a win for recovering addicts, who mustn't be summarily discredited when they're victims of violence (or accused of unproved violence).
Justice is a win for all!
Yes, it speaks loudly how far we have come in believing non-perfect victims.
Yes, yes, & yes. ADDICTION is a disease. Those who never drink at all, suffer from depressive disorder, even suicide.
Excellent point.
Yes!!!!!!!
Very. Well. Stated.
Before the Depp v Heard Trial, Legal Eagle was the only youtube lawyer I've ever heard of. This case sure is a boon to the lawyer community on youtube, and for me, you are, by far, the best of them all because 1) you aren't an out-and-out "DeppHead"; 2) you aren't clickbaity, which is the case with DeppHead channels, even those owned by lawyers.
Anyway, there was only one thing Legal Eagle said about this case and it was that the hurdle JD must overcome in a US court to prove his case is much, much, much, much, much higher than in the UK court system. Legal Eagle seemed to think that it was a foregone conclusion that JD would lose so this is some kind of a miracle and I am so happy to see it and grateful for your unbiased coverage. More power to you!
"Tell the world Johnny , your are the victim of abuse."" He did tell the world. And the jury and the world believed him!!!!!!!!!!!!! 😃😃😃😃😃😃😃🙏🙌
hurray!!! Johnny Wins!! Congratulations🎉🥳 God bless you Johnny!
That one clip of audio sunk her
To bad he now must deal with himself.Toxic to the core so conflicted can hardly phrase a sentence he must get clean and stay clean.Career pretty much over.What big names will touch him?
@@richardkneeland9576 I think his career will be back on track after this. Have you seen the goodwill he has globally? Just look online at how many people support him.
@@richardkneeland9576 I don't think he's had as many addiction problems since the relationship with Heard is over. The abuse drove him more to the drugs and alcohol and heard portook of it too.
@@richardkneeland9576 Bad losers always make statements like this one! Johnny just got his reputation back and his job offers will come once again, maybe not with WB OR DISNEY but they will come. She was PROVEN TO BE A LIAR or were you asleep when all the audio and other photos with metadata on them, why if she was so badly beaten and S/V didn’t she go to hospital? To get things documented…
Seriously I don’t understand why people still support her! 🤦🏻♀️ jog on….
It's a Johnny Depp day!!! I'm thrilled for him!
I am in U.K. Johnny was in a PUB in Newcastle England watching on TV the verdict .I saw him come out and people were shaking hands with him
It wasn’t about the money for Depp, it was about getting the truth out - he’s done that so the haters should leave him alone & let him do his thing. Cheers from Australia 😉
I agree Mez. From a fellow Aussie!!
They didn’t both win, Johnny won. I think jury was confused and just wanted to get the hell out of there. It makes no sense.
waldmen should have know better, he should pay the 2 million.
I am a big fan of justice, but an even bigger fan of truth! I never heard of Amber Heard before this trial. I have absolutely no respect for her and am perfectly happy if I never see or hear about her again. The only one who set back the me2 movement was her, in my opinion. I feel she really needs to be banned from speaking out about DV. Loved watching the verdict with Peter and Papa! Great job!!
You have to look at the statement they thought was maybe a lie from Waldman…. I get it. But what I love is they told Johnny and the world that she LIED!! Huge win for Johnny!
Her attorney's do not seem to care that she lost. Probably so happy they do not have to deal with her anymore!!
I don’t think her lawyers knew just exactly what they were getting into. Completely caught off guard and was striving to do their best. Amber surprised them with everything she had done to Johnny, documented proof. Her recording admitted it. Which back fired on her. Johnny did not want to hang out the dirty laundry. But he did which hanging all out and stand up for what’s right. He’s no saint but he doesn’t deserve what she gave him. No one deserves that. And he stepped up and fought a good fight, and he won. Yea for justice. It worked.
They're appealing.
@@roadrunner17lee66 You are sooo right!!!
Also, she says she "won" in UK. I heard judge's son was best friends with The Sun reporter so he should have recused. I think it was a sham in the UK.
Actually I could be wrong but I think his son worked for the Sun
@@tinafight6426 yes he did and it was not about her she was just a Witness she didn’t have to be there
From the UK here, The Sun is such a disgusting rag of blatant lies that it’s banned in a lot of towns. They refuse to sell it. An entire city, Liverpool has banned it. This is from years back. The Sun lies about everything and has caused so many problems here.
She was there because she expected to win and could have her 15mins of smirking, backfired!
Oh good point! Didn’t even think of that! Could not handle more of her smugness and smirks!
The turd has been flushed.
Can't stop Smiling 😁Ear to Ear face hurts so Good! ⚖️My faith in Justice is Restored!!?
It doesn't make sense they awarded her in that one question. His award should have been much higher.
Today will be the day that you will always remember as the day you almost captured captain Jack Sparrow....😂😂😂😂
It isn’t that the jury believed her, they believed the police testimony regarding the two calls to the police. Personally I think they were finding against Waldman , not JD.
Sure, but isn’t one of the questions if JD published the statements?
The 2nd Waldman statement was not about Amber exclusively. Besides the police, Waldman also mentioned Amber's friends, her publicist and lawyer. Depp legal team was not able to prove the 3rd parties were involved in the hoax - even if they were, there was no evidence provided to the court. Anyways, the jury concerns are not about the hoax or Amber's credibility.
If I have any criticism on the verdict is that I don't think AH lawyers proved beyond any doubt, that Waldman produced the statement as a representant of JD. I don't know if the jury interpreted the facts differently than me and/or if the jury instructions weren't clear enough (we all know how AH team played dirty on that final day). But, one thing I'm sure: if there's any reasons to appeal, it's about this (the 2nd Waldman statement), and that's on JD's side, not AH's. The jury pretty much closed all of AH's appeal doors by answering YES to every single one of JD's questions.
Same. I think it wS the statement about being directed by layer and publicist
Without that I think she'd have lost that too.
Exactly
ABSOLUTELY RIGHT!! When you listen to that specific statement (written by AW) regarding the 2 police visits and the scene of AH and Co messing things up for the 2nd visit didn’t corroborate with the evidence. I could see her “winning” that statement. After watching the entire trial, the evidence, in my opinion, was that AH and Co DID mess things up, for photos, not for the 2nd police visits. So yes, that was a correct Jury decision as this is a defamation case.
So glad he won!! I’m not even a JD fan but got totally sucked into this and so relieved it’s a positive outcome for him.
I was sucked in too 😂 I wasn’t really following him really prior. Fascinating trial to watch. After watching him I started to believe him. Once she testified I knew she was lying. Now will watch his movies.
Same! But I’m a fan now! So Grateful to see justice prevail! Congrats to Johnny!!!
I think it had more to due with the specifics of the statement by Waldman saying they messed up the apartment and called 911 again - and they could not prove all of that.
I agree.
I don’t think she deserved any award. That said, the count they found in her favor was Waldman’s statement that they called the cops twice. I don’t think Depp proved they called the cops twice.
I agree but I also think it shows how much work these jurors did to make their decisions. They didn't show favouritism over either parties. It doesn't matter what AH try's to spin about women's rights and freedom of speech , neither of this has been changed because freedom of speech does not provide immunity to false claims. The majority of people can see their relationship was the worst combination of toxicity and troubled individuals. I have no doubt both of them behaved appallingly but he did not beat her or SA her. What "needs to change" is convictions without reviewing all evidence, MSM and the public need to learn from that.
But there were 2 sets police officers who had reports the same night.
The actual statement was that they called the cops when that didn't work cause the cops saw no damage, then amber and friends spilt wine and trashed the place and called again. There is proof that two sets of cops but not enough proof that amber and friends actually did the damage.
“I can’t believe they both won”
Everyone Else: Did she though? 😅
@K T Unless you have a bachelors in law, I suggest you chill on the "I'm too cool for school attitude".
The statement heard won was about the police being called twice and trashing the placd but no damage on police video and they only heard about 1 call maybe that's why that statement was
It's not that they believed johnny was the abusive one
If Amber continues to post accusatory statements against JD isn’t that continuing defamation? She learned nothing from the punitive judgement against her.
she better leave Johnny alone he ain't playing
Of course not!!! She is solidly delusional & doesn't want to be healthy.
They may demand an injunction against her from doing that. This is not finalized yet. What Emily Baker said on law tube
The important thing is that the jury does not believe the Jonny is an abuser and that’s huge
They didn't both win! There was one part of the lawyer's statement that was NOT true and the jury determined not to overlook that. The jury pretty much said, we don't believe her; we are fair - we considered each statement separately.
Surely one of the jury believed Amber and so the others had to compromise to get to a final decision.
Nope. I hate that she won anything, but it kind of made sense. Because the 2nd lot of cops came out and saw no damage to penthouse, so how could they have spilled wine and roughed the place up at that point. I mean I believe they did, but it wasn't at the point the police came the 2nd time around. The body cams showed no damage so it would have looked bias if they hadn't taken that into account. But in comparison to Johnnys win, and the severity of the defamation is huge on Johnnys side. So he won no doubt. But I don't think she should have won because there was no proof Johnny had anything to do with waldmans statements IMO.
My heart hurt for the jurors when they did not fill all the blanks in. Now they are in a rush to come to $ figures.
I’m so glad JD won. Through this trial I’m now a big fan of him as a person!
I'm delighted with the outcome. Perhaps it will make those who plan to lie under oath think twice.
Yes Johnny won! Thanks for everything during this trial. I will definitely be tuned into whatever cases you have to stream and anything up and coming! Thanks again Peter
New music: ruclips.net/video/4QNHdQAhC2Q/видео.html
Yes go Johnny
Love how FAST this channel grew. In ONE MONTH!!! So great 1: family channel- Dad, son & his wife 💙 2: great educational information. 3. Win - win as they are a real law firm. Win for us & their firm! I’m hooked watching
❤️🌹❤️ We believe in him - not because he is famous because he was telling the truth. Thanks for the live trial stream! Congratulations to #teamjohnny ❤️🌹❤️ Justice has been served. I wish him Peace ☮️ 💜💜💜☮️ It was a great day for all victims of abuse because of Johnny’s courage for truth. Loved your show Peter, thank you. ( first time in trial AH looked emotionally real) Pray she gets help.
I think it's very telling that his statement was about his friends and family and her statement was all about herself.
Wooohoooo! Congrats Johnny!
Also for all those saying he should be there for the verdict, please note that he has stated that his concert tour with Jeff Beck was pre-planned long before the trial started and he has to keep those commitments.
Johnny is the one who wanted this to be live and cameras. Judge allowed one camera.
The $2M was on a specific thing Waldman said about her and her friends staging evidence. If I remember correctly, the officers refuted what was said about damages noted...or something along those lines. She still lied about being abused at that time, but what Waldman said was not accurate and true.
They wanted to punish waldman not Johnny
Yay! KARMA!!!!
AH- today is the day that you will always remember as the day you almost caught Captain Jack Sparrow 🏴☠️
Justice has prevailed! Johnny actually won 10 million, 350 thousand dollars! Halleluia!!! Thank you for your great commentary during this whole trial. God bless you!
I didn't see Mr Rottenborn look in Mr Depp team and smile he looked stone face, AH didn't come out of court laughing like she was in the UK I am very pleased and happy for Mr Depp!!
All u see is AH chest going up and down as they read the verdict ! Tell’em Johnny ! He did, the jury and world believed him!
So happy Johnny won! It was criminal what Amber did to him. They both hurt each other but she wrote the article to ruin his life intentionally. So she deserved what she got.
Congratulations Johnny Depp
Johnny told his TRUTH and WON ,Amber told her LIES and lost
Do we owe the judge a thank you for allowing this trial to be live streamed?
Absolutely yes. Look at the lies she spewed in that interview, imagine what she would have said if it wasn't
You have a great dad, Peter...He seems like a sweet man. May God continue to bless your family. He did a great job in raising you!!!! Godl Bless Him!!!
Amen.
I think the jury just thought that one statement, being so specific about details that could not be known, went too far.
And I disagree with them on that. It is exactly what she did and after hours of watching the trial you can’t help but really believe she staged it all! I would not put it past her to stage a “crime scene.” Waldmon knows. 🤓
@@gabrielamartiniuc6322 I'm just as confused as everyone else as to that finding.
I agree with your dad. If they found AH to be lying on all counts, then how could they find AW’s statements to be defamatory - if he was merely calling out her lies?? Truly makes no sense.
JD's team did not prove the spilled wine etc was a set up. That's what it means to me , so amber lied on everything else but the evidence was not there to say amber, her friends, her lawyer and her publicist staged evidence. I agree with that.
The jury question to the judge yesterday made me real nervous because it indicated to me that there was dispute meaning there was at least one pro-Heard juror. The one statement that Heard won on her counterclaim strikes me as appeasement for that juror or jurors -- it was the least bad one (i.e., not the ones that said Amber's claim were a hoax) and there was room to say "so they spilled some wine and roughed up the place" was actual malice even though Waldman may have believed it because he wasn't there so how could he know about spilling the wine and roughing up the place? So it's not that big a stretch to say that part was reckless disregard.
I don't agree with that but it certainly works as an opening to appease any pro-Heard jurors. And Depp can always maintain that it was Waldman's words, not his, so court of public opinion still goes his way on it.
I totally agree that there was a hold-out juror who had to be appeased.
I think the Jury was making a statement that they didn't think that they could agree/prove that the friends of Amber staged the damage in the Penthouse that the attorney stated to the Daily Mail. Love the coverage by You and your dad.
That’s how I took it too! Either way-So happy for Johnny!!
Same here.
I think you’re right. There’s still a lot of confusion surrounding that episode.
I hope the jury talks! They need to write books or something.
They just didn’t believe her friends were in on the hoax that’s it.
Amber won on the allegation that she had manufactured a crime scene essentially. I think the jury did not believe the abuse allegations but at the same time they felt that one statement by Waldman was defamatory. If you look at it that was the decision is not really inconsistent
And not so important this win about that lol
I agree. They couldn't prove any staging or that they got a story straight between cop visits or called lawyers/pr. Do I think that made sense
my read too
That makes the most sense. She probably didn't stage a crime scene.
I agree. It was the one thing she had witnesses that were believable. They all testified that they cleaned up between the two sets of cops.
I'm pretty sure Johnny and his team accomplished what they wanted to accomplish. The world got to see and hear, all the testimony, all the recordings, all the all the text messages, all the witnesses. Speaking as a battered woman, Amber Heard did not pull off any fear whatsoever. Anyone that is ever been beaten and or cavity searched would not be so cool and collect. I've been in hiding for over 30 years. I chose life! I do wonder if Amber Heard is ever going to keep her commitment in regards to the donations.
I only found this channel through the Depp. v Heard trial. I have learned so much in this short space of time. Thank you for all you do to bring light to US law and to teach ppl like myself, who have no law experience. I'm grateful to have found this channel.
Peter thx so much for your coverage. I came over from a diff lawyer who said JD didn't have a chance. You restored my faith in lawyers 😂
I wanted to buy a chat, but guess it needs to be live, so I’ll tune in again. AH tweeted (w her aty’s approval) basically a denial, frustrating? AH is not healthy minded, n has no conscience or remorse, no accountability of wrong doing!
Definitely 1 holdout on the - staging and spilling wine under the council of lawyers and publicists
Hahaha that look on Rottenborne is priceless!!!!!!
From now onwards, we need cameras in the Court. Why? So that the whole world can see.
I think the jury determined that some sort of violence occurred on both sides, but they seemed especially stuck on that sexual violence claim she made (based on the question they asked yesterday). It was so over the top, and such a horrific claim to make - with ZERO evidence. so they punished her harder.
Amber has made a statement. I hope she gets the help she needs. Agreed with all you said in other video re Gerry judge. I think the jury got it right even though I didn’t want Amber to get anything for her lies. I never watch anything to do with celebrities but the injustice of this gripped me. It’s been an emotional roller coaster. Thank you to you, your beautiful wife and adorable dad for covering this. I’m in a different time zone so playing catch up. Prayers have been answered. God bless you all and thanks be to God🙏
I think AH won on the 2nd count because the jurors thought there was a police visit and therefore was not a lie. I think they were confused
They didn't prove that Amber and her friends staged the room, spilled wine, etc.
@@mitzikimzey5957 well if you look at body camera there's nothing they came twice and she produced pictures claiming it was that night. Common sense tells you that's what they did.
@Emma Grant I am most definitely pro Depp. I believe it is what they did too. I was saying what an attorney said as to why Johnny lost on that count. His attorneys didn't prove it happened that way.
The jury just decided evidence in court did not substantiate Waldmans 2nd statement as being true
This is a triple win for Johnny. Johnny got the clean sweep and won, Amber won 1 count on her counterclaim, so she can’t say it was unfair, and the punitive damages shows the jury wanted to punish Amber further and didn’t want to punish Johnny.
I agree, I wish he'd had a clean sweep and her none, but on the other hand she cannot claim they were biased either.
Johnny ganó, contó la verdad y el mundo le cree. Adiós Amber.
With respect to the counter claim AH lost on the counts 1 and 3 where it stated that she was a victim. The 2 claim was the statement regarding Waldman’s statement about AH and her friends making to phone calls to the police and setting up the place.
I think the jury believed that Depp did not physically/sexually abuse AH, but believed that she and her friends did not call the police twice and the statement made to the press was false
This comment is real wrinkly brain in comparison to any other speculation.
They did call twice. There were two visits by the police. However, there's no proof in court that her lawyer and publicist advised her on how to set a scene up and make it look good. Maybe there is evidence of that waldman saw but we didn't
@@gingersnap9712 well in the issue of deciphering where exactly she won on any defamation grounds, the lack of ability to prove the second statement in its entirety is why they would find it meets the criteria of defamation.
It was respectful of Depp to not be there.
The worst day of AH's life and he'd be there smiling at the retribution and crowds would be screaming and cheering for him.
A DV victim having grace with their perpetrator.
Excellent comment 👌 👍 👏 PERFECTLY SAID 👌 👏
I see them as thinking the statement itself wasn’t completely true
Let just sum up and do the math. Both used the media to try their case prior to this law suit. Heard won on the one statement which was about “staging” the penthouse. Which is something that really is difficult to prove.
The math: 7m divorce settlement she probably would have kept? 10m - 2m means he gets the divorce settlement plus interest back pretty much?
Was it ever leaked if there was a "he's not there so he don't care" discussion in the jury ?
Johnny doesn't have to be there. He already knows something!?
Thank you Peter for all the hard work & hours of great commentary on this trial! I hope your channel continues to thrives & we love when you have your dad on. It’s the best of old school- new school ! ❤️
Thank you for your previous explanation of the jury deliberation and their questions. Your explanation provided my understanding of the verdict. I’m so happy that JD gets his back his reputation. As a victim of dv, I knew AH was lying.
The jury took issue w one statement in the Walman tweet and gave her money for that. They did not see things being staged for a 2nd 911 call. the 2nd set of police said they were responding to the first call etc.
So the jury didn’t find that JD’s lawyer had any basis to state AH & friends were coached on how to rough the place up by her divorce lawyer and publicist. Therefore, they found that statement to be defamatory. That’s my take on it. But I can’t wrap my head around how they can find agency when attorney-lawyer privilege stops them from being certain there was any agency…
Truth never perishes indeed. It's not about money. This victory is his true legacy for his children. Thank you for your extraordinary work. Full respect and appreciation from Greece.
Gal gotta give that divorce settlement right back and still "pledged" to pay the ACLU - new excuse.
I think the jury did a wonderful job … the legal aspects could be very confusing. I’m 78 yr old, and since this is a civil case, and considering how horrific the charges were, I am not surprised JD wasn’t in court. So very thankful to you all for covering this! I sat on one criminal jury - it was intense - but I’m glad for having the experience.
It wasn’t an inconsistent verdict.
Count 2 included the involvement of Amber’s friends, which distinguishes it from the other counts.
The jury thought Amber was a liar, but not necessarily all of her friends
The friend that Johnny Depp went over to London to play his head with passed away shortly after Johnny may have known he was sick
Hi Peter thank you for your excellent coverage and yes justice has been served I’m so happy for Johnny 👏🏼🍾🍾🍾✊❤️❤️❤️
Johnny told the world and foiled your evil plan. We heard Heard and called BS!
✊💙#truth
I think it wasn't just Amber...It was her coterie. but it would have been messy to go after her friends, they had to focus on her because she was the focus. It was the wise path for discovery, for presenting evidence, and ultimately to a truthful victory.
It was Depp’s attorney speaking and saying too many specifics that they didn’t like…not JD personally that they wanted to punish.
AH can now honestly say JD beat her 😉
As much as the glorious Camille was watchable and wonderful, the real hero of this trial was that judge! What a decent lady - seemed to offer no bias to either side.
AH was such a loser. Money 🤑
I was thrilled to see JD win 💰
I CANT BELIEVE JUSTICE IS DONE!!!!!!!
Pops, you're so in touch with this trial. You and your son are very good at what you guys do. Thank you for keeping us informed. God Bless you, guys. I will forever remember you two.
They just told AH. She lost!
They may have believed that what JD’s attorney said…shouldn’t have been said publicly.
I find it interesting that originally the jury didn't want to give either side money. However I do believe that if the jury had known what they set as punitive would be reduced that much, they would have awarded JD 15 instead of 10.
The verdict in her favor doesn’t say that the claims in the article were necessarily false, rather that JD didn’t meet the burden of proof.
They didn’t need to believe her. The burden of proof wasn’t hers.
I think maybe they were not convinced that Amber destroyed the apartment that night....which is why they did a compromise. I think they believed there was a hoax but maybe not the way the hoax went that night
Team Tragos here. Appreciating your objective coverage. Thank you! You guys give me hope for the justice system.
I LOVE you involving your father! Super awesome!
So happy for this verdict, and very happy this chaos trial brought me to your channel. I'm def gonna keep following your channel and maybe even watch some trials, I am a convert