in my opinion, as I have been down the premium brand road, then after I bought my second Steeldive which was the sd1953 smurf. I then sold the big-brand dive watches because I realized it was too much money as appose to trying to impress others I only needed to tell the time and for me at least impress myself I liked the watch.SD1953 off which from then on was the philosophy of my future watch collection.
Agreed, if I like the look of a watch, having to wait years and devote months of work to own it is a pain in the bum. Much nicer to order it on line for less than a days wages and receive it within a week. Same look, similar performance, no worries.❤
@@TheWatchChannelAU I find a Rolex Sub date of 10,700 new at the dealer. a major theft, how crazy are you if you buy this. a SteelDive or San Martin costs 300. Steel is steel and sapphire glass, the material costs are not far apart. you pay 9000 too much just for the rolex name and the super fame. nothing more or less
I bought 3 of the Steeldive, love the look, Seiko movement, feel and lume! Of course anyone who bought one wants a Rolex but, when it comes to price (retail and otherwise )and wait is a challenge.. thank for the deep dive of the iconic Rolex Submariner , just makes me appreciate my Steeldives even more. Especially that lume. One of the best value for money.
I don’t want a Rolex I personally believe Swiss watches are overrated especially Rolex, you pay so much just for a brand you can get cheaper watches with way better specs, one can argue that they polish their movements to high standard but who is opening their watch to show their movements? It’s a waste of money and if I had all the money in the world I’ll still not buy a Rolex.
I ordered my Steeldive green bezel/black face (I guess they call them Kermits) on Sept 2 from Ali Express. It is now the 7th and it is being delivered today. That is an amazing delivery time from Asia. I have the Captain Williard as well and it was keeping nearly perfect time. Dropped it on the bathroom's hard tile floor and now it's running 80 seconds fast a day. I can live with that because when I wind it I can just adjust the time. All in all, you get one hell of a watch with Steeldive.
I bought mine over the summer same Kermit. Lume, look, everything screams beautuful well made watch. Seiko movement guarantees excellent movement quality. We should start a Kermit Club. :-))))
Just got my SD1953 today. Easy to adjust the links. Just a great watch. Great value to price. Your video here is what tipped me to go ahead and get one. So glad I did. Thank you!
It's actually far better than what Rolex was in the 50's - 70's. Rolex of that era now let me see... hollow end links, aluminium bezel inserts, plexiglass, rattly bracelets, and they often leaked (various Military forces ditched them due to failure rates). Rolex is a case of "stick a crown logo on your dial and crown and fake it till you make it". Thankfully for Rolex they had iconic designs, and were able to improve quality iteratively that by the 2000's they actually started to get decent.
I've never owned a Rolex but I have no desire to spend that much on a watch. I'd never want to wear it for fear of damage or theft. I do like the look of the Sub though. Hence, my SD1953 has been my daily wearer for 6 months now. It keeps good time @ +2s/day. A number of people have complimented me on it. I've even had Rolex wearers strike up a conversation thinking I was a fellow owner - I soon put that straight.. 😇 One thing I have learned is that macro views of watches in reviews have little bearing on seeing them in person/on wrist. None of those minutae are even visible to the naked eye. Furthermore, the only people who typically comment on watches are watch nerds - the rest of the world couldn't care less. Bottom line? Buy what you like and what makes you happy. However, the reality is that the SD1953 is everybit as good as the Rolex, most of the time (no pun intended..). If having a status symbol on your arm is important to you then nothing but the genuine item will do. For everyone else, forget about your kids inheriting your Rolex. Invest the money wisely for 20-30 years instead and give them a pot of cash to do as they please. You could buy 10x SD1953s for the price of a Rolex service...
I’ve got the Steeldive GMT Coke. I’m seriously impressed with it. Fairly accurately tells the time, 300m water resistance, and looks like the real thing from even quite close up. Best of all I get a ceramic Coke which Rolex have refused to make. Downsides are the lume on the hands is weak, it’s quite heavy, some of the edges are a bit sharp, and the cyclops is over-magnified. But overall I love it. It’s Bling Without The Sting!
@paulvon2378 Could you please justify the price difference between the two watches taking into consideration that the cost of producing these watches is'nt anywhere near the retail price difference..........what makes the rolex over 14,000 dollars more.
Diese minimale Unterschiede rechtfertigen niemals den hohen Preis der Rolex. Ich habe eine Invicta Pro Diver Automatik mit einer Gangabweichung von +- 3 Sekunden am Tag und bin hoch zu frieden
The video and audio are tip notch. Those close-up and panning shots were very nice and crisp. The clicking the watch made when spinning the bezel was very satisfying. Would definitely make for some good asmr, lol.
I have this watch, Steeldive with black bezel, first watch I bought on Ali, first time buying anything there frankly. Watch excided my expectations, the level of finish and assembly is amazing!! In my country Seikos are now 4x more expensive than Steeldive... Let's say this is not my last watch I bought on Ali ;)
I know exactly why I have 8 Steel Divers! They are better than every Swiss watch! The Taiwanese watchmakers a grandios and I would never buy another watch again!!! I am a Scuba 🤿 and I use all my Steelers nearly every day! Nothing to say and excellent watches - can only say: Switzerland close your doors, money and value has nothing to do with European grace! Asia is better and getting more better every day!!! Slowly Europe must getting teached in engeneering - they sleep to long time lazy at them pillow! Time to wake up!!!
I have a moderate collection and would like to eventually put a Rolex into it - probably an Explorer MK1. Homages offer the look and feel without the worry of loss or theft. But I totally understand the desire for a premium movement and materials.
Steeldive makes great watches. I have the Starbucks and the full black GMT from them and it is awesome for the price. Just lacking a lil bit when it comes to bracelet quality as compared with Pagani IMO but for the quality and build of the watch head, that is where the savings from bracelet goes to.
I have a Steeldive ‘Captain Willard’. It is a fantastic watch for the price, and I am literally waiting for my Steeldive ‘Sub’ to fall through the door,as I ordered one last Friday. Great comparison review. Would love to see one on the Rolex and Steeldive Explorer 2, as I am interested in that one,as my next timepiece. All the best 👍🏾🇬🇧
I have the Steeldive Coke GMT and the black Explorer 2. Love them both but the Explorer has black hands - like the white one - when it should have chrome hands. It’s a bit more stealth and tool-looking so works as more of a daily around the house.
I think most people who can afford a Rolex are smart enough (maybe) to understand that a Rolex is not 125 times better than a Chinese Homage. But that’s not why they buy them. They buy them because they can. And honestly if I was in their shoes, I’m not sure I would do anything differently. Thanks for the great comparison! Also if a Steeldive is this close, what’s a San Martin like in comparison?
When you have money to burn, you burn money. Also the more expensive they are, the more attractive they are to the super rich. That's called a "veblen good", where the standard rules of supply and demand don't apply. What's sad is where lower income people foolishly play the game and give up their hard-earned for a Rolex and get in over their heads. If you have a Rolex - seriously no one cares.
Can somebody correct me if I’m wrong? I saw this steel dive on Amazon’s website and the description does indicate the watch does have AR coating. I saw numerous reviews of submariner’s and all the reviewers claim that Rolex does not put AR coating on its watches. Maybe I’m mixed up.
And best thing, you can wear the SD on a night out in London, and not only will no-one know the difference, but if some new arrval sticks a knife in your face, you can just throw it at him and you have lost less than a round of drinks....
From wearing gold Breitlings , Rolex and JLC I now wear daily an Addisdive quartz GMT Deepsea Hunter that was recommended on your channel. It’s a beautiful watch for 40 something quid. I wised up a long time ago to the Swiss luxury watch industry. A complete rip off. The Chinese are getting better at it and it’s brilliant. Good comparison review
I have bought steeldive as a Rolex placeholder until I am able to buy it. Honestly the quality is so good that I started to question the whole Rolex purchase idea...🤑
I have had the steel dive now for over a year. Still looks like new. And I wear it most days. My father in law has the Rolex and they are almost identical even the weight.
I recently bought an SD1953 for £60 and its really impressive, no sharp edges or anything, well finished, keeps time its just the cyclops is not the best but thats the only gripe I have with it
As an owner of Steeldive, Phoibos, San Martin, Seiko and Citizen as well as a Rolex GMT Master II and an Omega Seamaster, I love them all. Then one item people forget though is for now, buying a Rolex is like buying a house, you are just converting cash to an asset. The Rolex can always be sold and you will at least get your money back and if you keep it for a long time, make money. So in reality, the Rolex is in a sense, free. Great review and I love my Steeldive
Variety without spending $100,000 for 8 more watches and availability - Rolex is annoying and they don’t let people buy their watches - you have to be on some ridiculous list.
@@thetruthhurts7500I'm genuinly interested in your comment about the steeldive being a piece of crap as a dive watch. Have you used it for any diving and if so, why the disapointment?
A Rolex went from being a nice watch bought for its timekeeping purposes and durability/pressure rating to a Veblen good that is sought after exactly because it is more expensive than its use might indicate.
I recently bought a Steeldive 1953 in blue. I am very pleased with the watch. I own gen Omega, Rolex and Cartier along with Dan Henry, Seiko, and Orient watches. The Steeldive is amazingly close in overall quality to the genuine. It did have a fairly stiff bezel but it loosened up in use. The clasp is now milled and it has 6 micro adjusts. The SD 1953 is probably 95% there. The only issue now is the cyclops which is over magnified. I think the reason is the crystal is higher than the dial then in the genuine. The rehaut is also thicker.
I used to be a tissot seastar 1000 divers watch man till i bought a steeldive SD 1953, ive since sold my tissot seastar collection and changed to steeldive, so you can tell what my opinion is. Great video by the way.
I love my Addiesdive Submariner Quartz with the Miyota 2115 movement, its as accurate as the comparable ETA/Ronda Swiss movements. I can't afford a 2010+ Rolex Submariner yet, still in my 20's, and also currently saving for a Cartier Santos. This Addiesdive scratches the Rolex Sub itch for me and I suspect I'll still be wearing it and the automatic Steeldive 1953 when I finally obtain a Rolex Sub. Blue Collar worker in the trades where abuse is bound to happen to a watch so these nice Chinese Homage/Microbrands make much more sense than a Rolex. From a value perspective, durability/scratch resistance, and potential theft the Addiesdive checks all the right boxes for me. Oh and the lume is phenomenal, better than most $200+ dive watches from Swiss/Japanese brands.
Hello need your help mister, with a comparison not so huge like this one. im between this steeldive 1953 automatic or the addiesdive my-h3 quartz, can you help me decide if the price diference is better to go with what watch. Just want the best for the money❤ best regards
Depends on what is important..if you just want a good watch but are not bothered about automatic then the quartz will serve you well. On the other hand, if you want something that is mechanical then the 1953 is a solid option...at the end of the day..both are good options depending on your specific needs
A little late, but with the NH35 movement, you could probably switch out the dial as well with some custom ones online and you still have a nice case. Same with the movement being replaced, as mentioned in the video. Even though I don’t necessarily need the lume, I do like how the Steeldive did it on the bezel as well. Great video and comparison!
Depends on the model. I have 5 different Steeldive watches and 3 of them have a AR coating. The other 2 have not! Those without AR did cost under 200€ and the other with AR where over 200€ 😅
it should last as long as any other seiko powered automatic watch. in terms of water resistance....300m ..watches (even Rolex) are only ratd to the pressure of 300m....not the actual physical depth...in saying that 300m is about 250 more than anyone who is seeking to stay alive should need! :) If I am down 300m...the last thing I will be worrying about is if my Steeldive is still ok.....hahahha
I love watches, but I gotta be honest........I cannot justify spending thousands of $$$$ on 1 watch and I make a damn good income in the 6 figure territory. The premiums on Rolex are just insane, fast forward to today and the luxury watch market is tanking, the free for all spending since the covid years are over and reality is setting in for those that blew all their money. So I will buy homage watches as long as it is a quality watch, bought a San Martin & Watchdives models and I'm completely satisfied. So now that I know about Steeldives, I might pick up one to see if I like it.
FWIW, the NH 35 can be serviced. It just costs too much. However, if done, they can be substantially improved. It seems the Seiko skimps on lubrication and adjustment on the NH 35s so as not to give their more expensive movements too much competition.
I have been looking at the SD1970 but now I have another choice, crap, oh well, but interesting to see the quality of Steeldive " tribute ' watches overall.
I think people forget the bulk of the cost of any watch is the movement. And of course the luxury materials like white gold indices that go into Rolex that gives it a striking look a homage will never achieve. Ceramic is ceramic but it’s hard to match the rest of a Rolex
In the era of smartphones that doesn't really matter anymore, because now you can readjust your cheap and cheerful timepiece to an atomic clock (your smartphone synced to GPS time), whenever you want.
IMO, Rolex have really overdone it with their move towards "luxury". I know it's working for them financially, but after having worn a friend's shoddily maintained 5-digit no-date the other day (not one service in nearly 30 years of ownership ... yikes!), I'd rather own a well-maintained or mildly refurbished one of those. It's much less flashy and noticeable on your wrist, it doesn't look as chunky as the more modern iterations of the watch and it was, actually, somewhat affordable when it was new. I'd almost call it "discreet" compared to the more modern versions - both in its looks and in the way it sits on your wrist. All that said: The difference in finishing and attention to detail really shows at this level of magnification - the hands and the printing on the dial look so much nicer on the Rolex. Does it really matter though considering the difference in price? I don't think so - but I would be lying if I didn't admit that, of course, I'd rather be wearing a genuine Rolex than a Chinese or even Swiss homage.
If I was going to purchase a premium watch not as an investment, but something to wear. It would likely be the Omega Seamaster, it looks great, has a visible movement on the back and it's 3 or 4 times cheaper than the Rolex.
I have been saving for decades to get a submariner, and then I got tired of trying to build the bank up for the Rolly. Just recently, I started looking elsewhere 😮. And low and behold, I looked at the SD. OMG !!!! So now I can get some really well-made watches. I ordered my first SD1953 green bezel. I'm so excited!!!!!!!!! A big thanks to all the inexpensive watch reviewers. I've had a complete mind change away from all the ultra's, I've found really great watches------mostly 😢 stay away from sturling, chrome watch bodys insted of ss, just 💩💩💩
To be honest the movement and precision in placement of the markers is a noticeable difference. Not nearly worth the price tho. Btw try the SD1957 if you like the Omega Seamaster.
10x for the review. Ordered one. The finishing is perfect and I prefer the flexible (not perfect) bracelet compared to my swiss watches. Needs a small adjustment as its running -10s a day wirh a 1.3ms beat error.
I have the same Steeldive and the watch is simply brilliant! It even runs as accurate as +2/3 seconds a day - Steeldive does a good job at regulating the NH35 before it leaves the factory. Still cannot believe how you could buy a watch with such good finish and movement for this sort of money :)
Did you buy yours directly from steeldive? I'm thinking of buying the G.M.T. from there website but I'm a little nervous about putting in my credit card number.
I've got three Steeldives. SD1979 is a Squale Atmos 50 homage. Ships on wrong strap but fit a tropic and it looks pukka. Wears well but AR coating is an issue on domed crystal that reduces legibility. Got a SD1953 that I got lucky with the NH35 and is very accurate like COSC level +4 sec/day on Water Accuracy Meter. Wears great but everyone knows what a Submariner Date is and knows its unlikely to be a real one unless you are also looking the part and driving the part looking like a highly paid footballer suited and booted and driving a luxury car. You will look a bit of a knob wearing it to the pub in just jeans and polo shirt. So I got a SD1934T that I like the legibility and wearibility of and not many will know about the Explorer its a homage of. All good. Mainly. Wears well. Reads at glance. But the NH35 in it is nowhere near as accurate as the NH35 in my SD1953. I reckon maybe +20 sec/day. I reset it daily. Accuracy is a bit crap after a quartz. Like no battery automatic but don't want to be resetting it daily. Love how Rolex wear. Won't afford one. Thinking of a Tissot Gentleman as a watch that will wear as well as a Rolex with a Swiss movement that should be regulated to be accurate. 10 times cost of Steeldive but 10 times less than cost of a Rolex. Not sure if Steeldive use TMI Indonesian or SIi Japanese NH35 movements. Variability on accuracy you get. Not worth taking it to a watchmaker to regulate an NH35 as they'd charge twice cost of a replacement NH35. Maybe buy another NH35 movements to get a watchmaker to fit it to see if you get an accurate one. If my SD1934T was as accurate as my SD1953 I'd sell my SD1953. I double wrist both and use my SD1953 as an accurate watch to reset my inaccurate SS1934T with!
Gibson is the Rolex and Steel dive is the Squire equivalent in the guitar world. 10 times more for struggling to be twice better. Law of diminishing returns kicks in big time.
I always remember browsing for guitars back in the 80s. I was trying all the guitars I drooled over. Things like American Strats, Gibsons SGs and Les Pauls,. then I picked up a Japanese Washburn for a fraction of the price. I couldn't believe how much better it felt and sounded. Despite being better in every way than the American icons I told myself I was just imagining it. How could a cheap Japanese Washburn be better than the mighty Fenders and Gibsons that all the iconic rockers played? I couldn't afford the Fenders or Gibsons but I could have stretched to the Washburn but I didn't buy it because I was in denial. Fast-forward 40 years and I now know the Japanese guitars back then were far better than the American stuff but at the time I was blinded by branding and marketing. I learnt a valuable lesson.
The Rolex is a wonderful watch and if it cost an appropriate $1250 USD it would be a bargain... But luxury watches are not priced according to what it cost to build but by what 'luxury' demands. So any homage will present better bang for buck. It is amazing what the Chinese can offer at those prices even if they lack any original designs to save their lives. If they threw a miyota 8300 movement with a better power reserve than the NH35 it would be even better!
(#1)I love this video and all your videos. There is contradiction on RUclips about the UV coatings. Some say UV coating on the Steeldive but not on the Rolex, several videos in fact. On a different subject I seen imperfections on aligents on the Rolex. I could Never, Never, afford a real Rolex. But I see by review videos that I am not really missing out much.
Being disabled certainly crimps the budget, but even if I had a Swiss swimming pool stacked with money, I would not spend USD 20K or more on a watch. Crikey, my last 2 "already house broken" jalopies both together were less than 15K as they sit in the driveway. Here in USA, 15K is the steel/black starter model with date. They come in different trims for 20K to 40K, and then the sky is the limit, with one listed over 80K new, but you can "donate" even more to Rolex's shelter for gnarly executive personnel and their meal fund. I would instead buy that SteelDive, or just keep my 3 Invictas, and instead make a donation to our local animal shelters worth a Rolex :) We'd have some really happy dogues, and I'd still have a really nice "tool watch", which the original Rolex Subbie once was!
Rolex abusa y ha abusado de sus precios de forma exagerada pero porque se aprovecha de su fama del pasado. Steeldive tiene unas características no lejos del Rolex y me parece absurdo regalar tanto dinero por tal de decir que " tengo un Rolex". No está justificado su precio, y menos si lo comparas con Steeldive. Gracias Steeldive por darle un bofetón a Rolex para que se baje de escalón y así no abuse tanto en los precios. Es de locos.
Un confronto impari! Ma Steeldive 1954, può essere una buona soluzione, per chi non si può permettere di acquistare un Rolex Submariner. Cordiali saluti 😊
Owned a Rolex back in 1969 when it cost me a month's pay. I can sincerely say without reservation that every one of my Steel Dive watches have been better. The worst thing about the Rolex was the terrible clasp that terrible to the nth Degree and eventually caused the loss of my watch. Rolex is a nice watch but not worth the price and I am not a fan.
If you love WEARING your watch, Steeldive is a no brainer. I appreciate some are more into the investment (?) aspect of high end ownership, good luck. This is a tool watch after all.
I have an addiesdive sold my 20 Yr old gmt master 5 yrs for profit and have not regretted it. My addiesdive only increases by 2 secs a day and can be worn everywhere. Still have a vintage rolex but I love my addiesdive and other small brands. Anybody could have a rolex years back I had 2 and 2 omegas. Things are much more expensive these days.
Just shows how overpriced Rolex watches have become. There was a time when they were just great quality tool watches, but sadly they’ve become status symbols. I can afford one, but I’ll never buy one as there are just too many other great watches out there which aren’t so overpriced!
I had a Rolex and sold it... so freaking expensive to service ($5-600). The seiko movements are amazing! They keep excellent time, and cost next to nothing to own. Rolex is nothing more than a status symbol. Seikos are high quality watches for the masses, and I swear by them.
Which would I buy? The Rolex is beautiful but even if I could afford one I wouldn't enjoy it. I wouldn't dare wear it because I'd fear damaging it or being mugged for it. That means it'd just live its life as a cabinet queen and I don't see the point of that. The SteelDive is amazing value for money but I wouldn't be able to shake the 'guy in a cheap fake Rolex' stigma. So my answer is I'd buy neither.
in my opinion, as I have been down the premium brand road, then after I bought my second Steeldive which was the sd1953 smurf. I then sold the big-brand dive watches because I realized it was too much money as appose to trying to impress others I only needed to tell the time and for me at least impress myself I liked the watch.SD1953 off which from then on was the philosophy of my future watch collection.
Much the same position I ended up at...I am happy with myself and what I wear...no need to impress anyone else!
Agreed, if I like the look of a watch, having to wait years and devote months of work to own it is a pain in the bum. Much nicer to order it on line for less than a days wages and receive it within a week. Same look, similar performance, no worries.❤
Thanks so much
@@TheWatchChannelAU I find a Rolex Sub date of 10,700 new at the dealer. a major theft, how crazy are you if you buy this. a SteelDive or San Martin costs 300. Steel is steel and sapphire glass, the material costs are not far apart. you pay 9000 too much just for the rolex name and the super fame. nothing more or less
@@johncarter6238 true
I bought 3 of the Steeldive, love the look, Seiko movement, feel and lume! Of course anyone who bought one wants a Rolex but, when it comes to price (retail and otherwise )and wait is a challenge.. thank for the deep dive of the iconic Rolex Submariner , just makes me appreciate my Steeldives even more. Especially that lume. One of the best value for money.
I don’t want a Rolex I personally believe Swiss watches are overrated especially Rolex, you pay so much just for a brand you can get cheaper watches with way better specs, one can argue that they polish their movements to high standard but who is opening their watch to show their movements? It’s a waste of money and if I had all the money in the world I’ll still not buy a Rolex.
@@agprimeI dislike rolex so much I would spend money to petition OTHER PEOPLE to not buy them! FR FR
Are your 3 Steeldives still workin OK? any problems or complains regarding durability?
@@francohic they have been great. No issues. Approx 40 hrs on reserve. I have taken them swimming and paddleboarding.
One of the best watch comparisons that i have seen. Nothing missed here. Well done.!! 👍
Glad you liked it!
I ordered my Steeldive green bezel/black face (I guess they call them Kermits) on Sept 2 from Ali Express. It is now the 7th and it is being delivered today. That is an amazing delivery time from Asia. I have the Captain Williard as well and it was keeping nearly perfect time. Dropped it on the bathroom's hard tile floor and now it's running 80 seconds fast a day. I can live with that because when I wind it I can just adjust the time. All in all, you get one hell of a watch with Steeldive.
I bought mine over the summer same Kermit. Lume, look, everything screams beautuful well made watch. Seiko movement guarantees excellent movement quality. We should start a Kermit Club. :-))))
They call them Starbucks..
Just got my SD1953 today. Easy to adjust the links. Just a great watch. Great value to price. Your video here is what tipped me to go ahead and get one. So glad I did. Thank you!
Sorry for enabling you!! Ahhaah hope you enjoy it mate!
I got a Steeldive SD1954 on a rubber strap and it is such a cool tool dive watch, pretty much what Rolex used to be in the 50s, 60s and 70s.
I cant believe how ridiculous these comments are...
Sometimes, truth hurts indeed. Take my word as a skipper and a diver, Steeldive serves its purpose right.
It's actually far better than what Rolex was in the 50's - 70's. Rolex of that era now let me see... hollow end links, aluminium bezel inserts, plexiglass, rattly bracelets, and they often leaked (various Military forces ditched them due to failure rates). Rolex is a case of "stick a crown logo on your dial and crown and fake it till you make it". Thankfully for Rolex they had iconic designs, and were able to improve quality iteratively that by the 2000's they actually started to get decent.
well said! @@thegorn
Complete nonsense. Spend your money on garbage if you want.
100 times more expensive, not even twice better.
Moron
The World has gone crazy! The law of diminishing return personified.
Personified? @@Edward1312
Rolex resell value is 100 times better too 😂
@@GaryGuo-v9b I am not a watch flipper.
I've never owned a Rolex but I have no desire to spend that much on a watch. I'd never want to wear it for fear of damage or theft. I do like the look of the Sub though. Hence, my SD1953 has been my daily wearer for 6 months now. It keeps good time @ +2s/day. A number of people have complimented me on it. I've even had Rolex wearers strike up a conversation thinking I was a fellow owner - I soon put that straight.. 😇
One thing I have learned is that macro views of watches in reviews have little bearing on seeing them in person/on wrist. None of those minutae are even visible to the naked eye. Furthermore, the only people who typically comment on watches are watch nerds - the rest of the world couldn't care less.
Bottom line? Buy what you like and what makes you happy. However, the reality is that the SD1953 is everybit as good as the Rolex, most of the time (no pun intended..). If having a status symbol on your arm is important to you then nothing but the genuine item will do. For everyone else, forget about your kids inheriting your Rolex. Invest the money wisely for 20-30 years instead and give them a pot of cash to do as they please. You could buy 10x SD1953s for the price of a Rolex service...
I love the Steeldive 1953. I got the "Smurf", the "Hulk", the "Kermit" and the black one. Fantastic watch. I am using the Hulk right now!
What Is better? Black, Green/ Green (Hulk) or Green/black (Kermit)?
I’ve got the Steeldive GMT Coke. I’m seriously impressed with it. Fairly accurately tells the time, 300m water resistance, and looks like the real thing from even quite close up. Best of all I get a ceramic Coke which Rolex have refused to make. Downsides are the lume on the hands is weak, it’s quite heavy, some of the edges are a bit sharp, and the cyclops is over-magnified. But overall I love it. It’s Bling Without The Sting!
So, the $100.00 steeldive has bezel lume and not the high dollar Rolex? Thats insane!
Chinese watches offering more value per dollar 😳
not even close to the Rolex. It's a $100 watch mate.
@@paulvon2378 no sht.
@paulvon2378 Could you please justify the price difference between the two watches taking into consideration that the cost of producing these watches is'nt anywhere near the retail price difference..........what makes the rolex over 14,000 dollars more.
Diese minimale Unterschiede rechtfertigen niemals den hohen Preis der Rolex. Ich habe eine Invicta Pro Diver Automatik mit einer Gangabweichung von +- 3 Sekunden am Tag und bin hoch zu frieden
The video and audio are tip notch. Those close-up and panning shots were very nice and crisp. The clicking the watch made when spinning the bezel was very satisfying. Would definitely make for some good asmr, lol.
@@TheRealMurKziLLa 🙏👍
I have this watch, Steeldive with black bezel, first watch I bought on Ali, first time buying anything there frankly. Watch excided my expectations, the level of finish and assembly is amazing!! In my country Seikos are now 4x more expensive than Steeldive... Let's say this is not my last watch I bought on Ali ;)
I know exactly why I have 8 Steel Divers! They are better than every Swiss watch! The Taiwanese watchmakers a grandios and I would never buy another watch again!!! I am a Scuba 🤿 and I use all my Steelers nearly every day! Nothing to say and excellent watches - can only say: Switzerland close your doors, money and value has nothing to do with European grace! Asia is better and getting more better every day!!! Slowly Europe must getting teached in engeneering - they sleep to long time lazy at them pillow! Time to wake up!!!
Are your 8 SteelDivers working OK until now? Im thinking of buying one, but Im worried about long term durability or possible issues. Thanks
Steeldive with a slimmer rehaut, and light grey numbers on the bezel would be excellent.
I have a moderate collection and would like to eventually put a Rolex into it - probably an Explorer MK1. Homages offer the look and feel without the worry of loss or theft. But I totally understand the desire for a premium movement and materials.
You can get premium movement and materials in plenty of watches below $1000, try a Seiko for example.
Steeldive makes great watches. I have the Starbucks and the full black GMT from them and it is awesome for the price. Just lacking a lil bit when it comes to bracelet quality as compared with Pagani IMO but for the quality and build of the watch head, that is where the savings from bracelet goes to.
I have a Steeldive ‘Captain Willard’.
It is a fantastic watch for the price, and I am literally waiting for my Steeldive ‘Sub’ to fall through the door,as I ordered one last Friday.
Great comparison review. Would love to see one on the Rolex and Steeldive Explorer 2, as I am interested in that one,as my next timepiece.
All the best 👍🏾🇬🇧
I have it as well. There's no need to even say "for the price" - it's just a fantastic watch full stop.
I have the Steeldive Coke GMT and the black Explorer 2. Love them both but the Explorer has black hands - like the white one - when it should have chrome hands. It’s a bit more stealth and tool-looking so works as more of a daily around the house.
I think most people who can afford a Rolex are smart enough (maybe) to understand that a Rolex is not 125 times better than a Chinese Homage. But that’s not why they buy them. They buy them because they can. And honestly if I was in their shoes, I’m not sure I would do anything differently. Thanks for the great comparison! Also if a Steeldive is this close, what’s a San Martin like in comparison?
When you have money to burn, you burn money. Also the more expensive they are, the more attractive they are to the super rich. That's called a "veblen good", where the standard rules of supply and demand don't apply. What's sad is where lower income people foolishly play the game and give up their hard-earned for a Rolex and get in over their heads. If you have a Rolex - seriously no one cares.
@@thegorn no truer words have been spoken sir. 👍🏼
Can somebody correct me if I’m wrong? I saw this steel dive on Amazon’s website and the description does indicate the watch does have AR coating. I saw numerous reviews of submariner’s and all the reviewers claim that Rolex does not put AR coating on its watches. Maybe I’m mixed up.
Well mate, that confuses the hell out of me then! The Submariner was absolutely clearer than the SteelDive.
I love my SD1953. I got mine on sale for $53. I have several Sieko and Citizen watches, and the SD doesn't disappoint.
And best thing, you can wear the SD on a night out in London, and not only will no-one know the difference, but if some new arrval sticks a knife in your face, you can just throw it at him and you have lost less than a round of drinks....
I remember when London was considered to be one of the safest big cities in the world. Thank you to diversity for putting an end to that.
New arrival! Hahaha
@@johntate5050 Wokeness in action
@@johntate5050 when was that, the bronze age? lmfao
@@urbnctrl No in the 1980s.
From wearing gold Breitlings , Rolex and JLC I now wear daily an Addisdive quartz GMT Deepsea Hunter that was recommended on your channel. It’s a beautiful watch for 40 something quid. I wised up a long time ago to the Swiss luxury watch industry. A complete rip off. The Chinese are getting better at it and it’s brilliant. Good comparison review
I have bought steeldive as a Rolex placeholder until I am able to buy it. Honestly the quality is so good that I started to question the whole Rolex purchase idea...🤑
Enjoy mate!
I have had the steel dive now for over a year. Still looks like new. And I wear it most days. My father in law has the Rolex and they are almost identical even the weight.
You can have rhis same watch on a Miyota movement too, that makes it even cheaper (about 36€ on sale) and the looks and durability are still there 😊
me again, i just got the gray version, wonder if you have that one???, maybe make a video comparison between the black and the grey
@@iron883cd yeah, I need to get that one...looks nice
I recently bought an SD1953 for £60 and its really impressive, no sharp edges or anything, well finished, keeps time its just the cyclops is not the best but thats the only gripe I have with it
As an owner of Steeldive, Phoibos, San Martin, Seiko and Citizen as well as a Rolex GMT Master II and an Omega Seamaster, I love them all. Then one item people forget though is for now, buying a Rolex is like buying a house, you are just converting cash to an asset. The Rolex can always be sold and you will at least get your money back and if you keep it for a long time, make money. So in reality, the Rolex is in a sense, free. Great review and I love my Steeldive
If I had a Rolex and Omega, why would you bother to wear Seiko. San Martin. etc?
Variety without spending $100,000 for 8 more watches and availability - Rolex is annoying and they don’t let people buy their watches - you have to be on some ridiculous list.
@@DavidV4444 I would wear the Omega daily
Shows how crazy Rolex price jacking is.
Just received my sd1953 starbucks days ago. I'm just like a kid with a new toy. I even go to bed wearing it. Great watch
Im very Happy with my Steeldive 1953. Thanks for the video 👍🏻
I'm so sorry
Sorry pal, there are better options
Two great watches. Rolex is simply pricing itself out of most markets.
Rolex doesn't want to be in any of those markets...Steeldive is a piece of crap as a dive watch....
Rolex is for buyers as an investment.
Not to really wear the watch, just on occasions.
I'm not that type....
@@thetruthhurts7500I'm genuinly interested in your comment about the steeldive being a piece of crap as a dive watch. Have you used it for any diving and if so, why the disapointment?
A Rolex went from being a nice watch bought for its timekeeping purposes and durability/pressure rating to a Veblen good that is sought after exactly because it is more expensive than its use might indicate.
Have dived with two of their dive watches.: The standard size and the Sea Dweller version. They worked flawlessly.
I recently bought a Steeldive 1953 in blue. I am very pleased with the watch. I own gen Omega, Rolex and Cartier along with Dan Henry, Seiko, and Orient watches. The Steeldive is amazingly close in overall quality to the genuine. It did have a fairly stiff bezel but it loosened up in use. The clasp is now milled and it has 6 micro adjusts. The SD 1953 is probably 95% there. The only issue now is the cyclops which is over magnified. I think the reason is the crystal is higher than the dial then in the genuine. The rehaut is also thicker.
I used to be a tissot seastar 1000 divers watch man till i bought a steeldive SD 1953, ive since sold my tissot seastar collection and changed to steeldive, so you can tell what my opinion is.
Great video by the way.
Thanks Buddy!! Have a great Christmas
@@TheWatchChannelAU
You're very welcome, have a great Christmas too
Thanks for the video, my only concern is if the 41mm steeldive wouldn't be to small for my 7.4 inch wrist
I doubt it
I have a 7.5 inch wrist. Both my Steeldive 41mm’s look great. Neither too big nore too small.
I love my Addiesdive Submariner Quartz with the Miyota 2115 movement, its as accurate as the comparable ETA/Ronda Swiss movements. I can't afford a 2010+ Rolex Submariner yet, still in my 20's, and also currently saving for a Cartier Santos. This Addiesdive scratches the Rolex Sub itch for me and I suspect I'll still be wearing it and the automatic Steeldive 1953 when I finally obtain a Rolex Sub. Blue Collar worker in the trades where abuse is bound to happen to a watch so these nice Chinese Homage/Microbrands make much more sense than a Rolex. From a value perspective, durability/scratch resistance, and potential theft the Addiesdive checks all the right boxes for me. Oh and the lume is phenomenal, better than most $200+ dive watches from Swiss/Japanese brands.
Thanks for the comment mate. Keep on enjoying them!
At the end of the day, they both tell time.
Hello need your help mister, with a comparison not so huge like this one. im between this steeldive 1953 automatic or the addiesdive my-h3 quartz, can you help me decide if the price diference is better to go with what watch.
Just want the best for the money❤ best regards
Depends on what is important..if you just want a good watch but are not bothered about automatic then the quartz will serve you well. On the other hand, if you want something that is mechanical then the 1953 is a solid option...at the end of the day..both are good options depending on your specific needs
1953s are fantastic value for money sub homages ...got the black on black and kermit love them both....
A little late, but with the NH35 movement, you could probably switch out the dial as well with some custom ones online and you still have a nice case. Same with the movement being replaced, as mentioned in the video. Even though I don’t necessarily need the lume, I do like how the Steeldive did it on the bezel as well. Great video and comparison!
other reviews say the SteelDive does have a AR Coating!
Depends on the model. I have 5 different Steeldive watches and 3 of them have a AR coating. The other 2 have not! Those without AR did cost under 200€ and the other with AR where over 200€ 😅
To be fair, it should be SteelDive vs San Martin. I would go with Steeldive
Love my Steeldive SD1953. Wear it in the sauna and pool every day. All good! Very happy!
How long will the steel dive last? Will it really do 300m under water?
it should last as long as any other seiko powered automatic watch. in terms of water resistance....300m ..watches (even Rolex) are only ratd to the pressure of 300m....not the actual physical depth...in saying that 300m is about 250 more than anyone who is seeking to stay alive should need! :)
If I am down 300m...the last thing I will be worrying about is if my Steeldive is still ok.....hahahha
@@TheWatchChannelAU fantastic thanks for replying 🙏
I saw other channels say that the Rolex doesn't have an AR coating, but the SD does, and they go as far as to show it.
I have a 1953 steeledive and I love it, it runs at +5 sec day.
I'm so sorry
Sorry about that, that tolerance is a bit loose
Invicta pro diver 8926 vs sd1953?
I love watches, but I gotta be honest........I cannot justify spending thousands of $$$$ on 1 watch and I make a damn good income in the 6 figure territory. The premiums on Rolex are just insane, fast forward to today and the luxury watch market is tanking, the free for all spending since the covid years are over and reality is setting in for those that blew all their money. So I will buy homage watches as long as it is a quality watch, bought a San Martin & Watchdives models and I'm completely satisfied. So now that I know about Steeldives, I might pick up one to see if I like it.
FWIW, the NH 35 can be serviced. It just costs too much. However, if done, they can be substantially improved. It seems the Seiko skimps on lubrication and adjustment on the NH 35s so as not to give their more expensive movements too much competition.
I have been looking at the SD1970 but now I have another choice, crap, oh well, but interesting to see the quality of Steeldive " tribute ' watches overall.
I think people forget the bulk of the cost of any watch is the movement. And of course the luxury materials like white gold indices that go into Rolex that gives it a striking look a homage will never achieve. Ceramic is ceramic but it’s hard to match the rest of a Rolex
In the era of smartphones that doesn't really matter anymore, because now you can readjust your cheap and cheerful timepiece to an atomic clock (your smartphone synced to GPS time), whenever you want.
What about the Relax ?
Is that the Uber fake watch with relax printed on the dial
Just got my SD1953 (Black). LOVE it. I'm not one to care what others"think".
Please compare an Invicta submariner to these watches!
IMO, Rolex have really overdone it with their move towards "luxury". I know it's working for them financially, but after having worn a friend's shoddily maintained 5-digit no-date the other day (not one service in nearly 30 years of ownership ... yikes!), I'd rather own a well-maintained or mildly refurbished one of those. It's much less flashy and noticeable on your wrist, it doesn't look as chunky as the more modern iterations of the watch and it was, actually, somewhat affordable when it was new. I'd almost call it "discreet" compared to the more modern versions - both in its looks and in the way it sits on your wrist.
All that said: The difference in finishing and attention to detail really shows at this level of magnification - the hands and the printing on the dial look so much nicer on the Rolex. Does it really matter though considering the difference in price? I don't think so - but I would be lying if I didn't admit that, of course, I'd rather be wearing a genuine Rolex than a Chinese or even Swiss homage.
How do you compare the weight of these two? Is steeldive lightweight?
Not particularly....they aren't too far off from each other
If I was going to purchase a premium watch not as an investment, but something to wear. It would likely be the Omega Seamaster, it looks great, has a visible movement on the back and it's 3 or 4 times cheaper than the Rolex.
@@blaser80 the movement in the omega is also light years ahead of the Rolex!
I have been saving for decades to get a submariner, and then I got tired of trying to build the bank up for the Rolly. Just recently, I started looking elsewhere 😮. And low and behold, I looked at the SD. OMG !!!! So now I can get some really well-made watches. I ordered my first SD1953 green bezel. I'm so excited!!!!!!!!! A big thanks to all the inexpensive watch reviewers. I've had a complete mind change away from all the ultra's, I've found really great watches------mostly 😢 stay away from sturling, chrome watch bodys insted of ss, just 💩💩💩
please compare the Cronos submariner l6005 with the Rolex!! would love to hear your thoughts
Where can I buy this watch?
s.click.aliexpress.com/e/_mMByZLu
$14,900 for the name, $100 for the watch. I'll stick with my $120 SteelDive thank you.
To be honest the movement and precision in placement of the markers is a noticeable difference. Not nearly worth the price tho.
Btw try the SD1957 if you like the Omega Seamaster.
I love that, "the Rolex fan boys" LMAO! Great video.
10x for the review. Ordered one. The finishing is perfect and I prefer the flexible (not perfect) bracelet compared to my swiss watches. Needs a small adjustment as its running -10s a day wirh a 1.3ms beat error.
Thanks man! Have a cracking Xmas!!
I own the Steeldive and it's a gem
I'm so sorry
@thetruthhurts7500 I'm not its a great beater watch for when I don't want to wear my Omega Seamaster
@TheBimmer74 Sorry pal, the San Martin version is more refined.
I have the same Steeldive and the watch is simply brilliant! It even runs as accurate as +2/3 seconds a day - Steeldive does a good job at regulating the NH35 before it leaves the factory. Still cannot believe how you could buy a watch with such good finish and movement for this sort of money :)
Did you buy yours directly from steeldive? I'm thinking of buying the G.M.T. from there website but I'm a little nervous about putting in my credit card number.
I've got three Steeldives. SD1979 is a Squale Atmos 50 homage. Ships on wrong strap but fit a tropic and it looks pukka. Wears well but AR coating is an issue on domed crystal that reduces legibility. Got a SD1953 that I got lucky with the NH35 and is very accurate like COSC level +4 sec/day on Water Accuracy Meter. Wears great but everyone knows what a Submariner Date is and knows its unlikely to be a real one unless you are also looking the part and driving the part looking like a highly paid footballer suited and booted and driving a luxury car. You will look a bit of a knob wearing it to the pub in just jeans and polo shirt. So I got a SD1934T that I like the legibility and wearibility of and not many will know about the Explorer its a homage of. All good. Mainly. Wears well. Reads at glance. But the NH35 in it is nowhere near as accurate as the NH35 in my SD1953. I reckon maybe +20 sec/day. I reset it daily. Accuracy is a bit crap after a quartz. Like no battery automatic but don't want to be resetting it daily. Love how Rolex wear. Won't afford one. Thinking of a Tissot Gentleman as a watch that will wear as well as a Rolex with a Swiss movement that should be regulated to be accurate. 10 times cost of Steeldive but 10 times less than cost of a Rolex. Not sure if Steeldive use TMI Indonesian or SIi Japanese NH35 movements. Variability on accuracy you get. Not worth taking it to a watchmaker to regulate an NH35 as they'd charge twice cost of a replacement NH35. Maybe buy another NH35 movements to get a watchmaker to fit it to see if you get an accurate one. If my SD1934T was as accurate as my SD1953 I'd sell my SD1953. I double wrist both and use my SD1953 as an accurate watch to reset my inaccurate SS1934T with!
Gibson is the Rolex and Steel dive is the Squire equivalent in the guitar world. 10 times more for struggling to be twice better. Law of diminishing returns kicks in big time.
I always remember browsing for guitars back in the 80s. I was trying all the guitars I drooled over. Things like American Strats, Gibsons SGs and Les Pauls,. then I picked up a Japanese Washburn for a fraction of the price. I couldn't believe how much better it felt and sounded. Despite being better in every way than the American icons I told myself I was just imagining it. How could a cheap Japanese Washburn be better than the mighty Fenders and Gibsons that all the iconic rockers played? I couldn't afford the Fenders or Gibsons but I could have stretched to the Washburn but I didn't buy it because I was in denial. Fast-forward 40 years and I now know the Japanese guitars back then were far better than the American stuff but at the time I was blinded by branding and marketing. I learnt a valuable lesson.
The Rolex is a wonderful watch and if it cost an appropriate $1250 USD it would be a bargain... But luxury watches are not priced according to what it cost to build but by what 'luxury' demands. So any homage will present better bang for buck. It is amazing what the Chinese can offer at those prices even if they lack any original designs to save their lives. If they threw a miyota 8300 movement with a better power reserve than the NH35 it would be even better!
(#1)I love this video and all your videos. There is contradiction on RUclips about the UV coatings. Some say UV coating on the Steeldive but not on the Rolex, several videos in fact. On a different subject I seen imperfections on aligents on the Rolex. I could Never, Never, afford a real Rolex. But I see by review videos that I am not really missing out much.
Great down to earth review!
How's the weight compared to the Rolex though? I like a heavy watch to feel I'm wearing something if that makes sense.
I get that mate, it's lighter imho but not cheaper light if that makes sense?
Buy the white-gold Rolex Submariner - that will be plenty heavy :)
I would buy both watches.
Wear the SteelDive & lock the Rolex in a safe.
@@derekcostello1016 hahaahh
One’s an investment the others a damn good watch for the money! That’s the difference imho.
Nope...The Rolex is an excellent dive watch..the other copy is a piece of crap
One is a legendary luxury watch and the other is a value monster. No comparison.
Neither is an investment.
Being disabled certainly crimps the budget, but even if I had a Swiss swimming pool stacked with money, I would not spend USD 20K or more on a watch. Crikey, my last 2 "already house broken" jalopies both together were less than 15K as they sit in the driveway. Here in USA, 15K is the steel/black starter model with date. They come in different trims for 20K to 40K, and then the sky is the limit, with one listed over 80K new, but you can "donate" even more to Rolex's shelter for gnarly executive personnel and their meal fund. I would instead buy that SteelDive, or just keep my 3 Invictas, and instead make a donation to our local animal shelters worth a Rolex :) We'd have some really happy dogues, and I'd still have a really nice "tool watch", which the original Rolex Subbie once was!
Good call out sir!
Rolex abusa y ha abusado de sus precios de forma exagerada pero porque se aprovecha de su fama del pasado. Steeldive tiene unas características no lejos del Rolex y me parece absurdo regalar tanto dinero por tal de decir que " tengo un Rolex". No está justificado su precio, y menos si lo comparas con Steeldive. Gracias Steeldive por darle un bofetón a Rolex para que se baje de escalón y así no abuse tanto en los precios. Es de locos.
I have the Steeldive. I like it a lot. I run a Nato strap with the TGV Casio mod on the strap.
I'm so sorry
has the two watches, if you live in a big city, rolex to use in feel moments and the steeldive to use every day.
Pleasure watching you, great review nice macro, subscribed
Thanks heaps mate
Un confronto impari! Ma Steeldive 1954, può essere una buona soluzione, per chi non si può permettere di acquistare un Rolex Submariner. Cordiali saluti 😊
Owned a Rolex back in 1969 when it cost me a month's pay. I can sincerely say without reservation that every one of my Steel Dive watches have been better. The worst thing about the Rolex was the terrible clasp that terrible to the nth Degree and eventually caused the loss of my watch. Rolex is a nice watch but not worth the price and I am not a fan.
If you love WEARING your watch, Steeldive is a no brainer. I appreciate some are more into the investment (?) aspect of high end ownership, good luck. This is a tool watch after all.
I have a steeldive, great watch. The rolex is about an investment and will hold value and can sell on, steeldive is throw away.
As a Steeldive fan, paying anymore for a watch like the Rolex that is not 15000 dollars better is rather foolish.
I have an addiesdive sold my 20 Yr old gmt master 5 yrs for profit and have not regretted it. My addiesdive only increases by 2 secs a day and can be worn everywhere. Still have a vintage rolex but I love my addiesdive and other small brands. Anybody could have a rolex years back I had 2 and 2 omegas. Things are much more expensive these days.
Why no pearl??
Bought steeldive for 50 euro, will see
Steeldiive or san martin my friend ??
Based on value ratio... steeldive
Just shows how overpriced Rolex watches have become. There was a time when they were just great quality tool watches, but sadly they’ve become status symbols. I can afford one, but I’ll never buy one as there are just too many other great watches out there which aren’t so overpriced!
Nice report, just liked & subscribed.
Thankyou
I had a Rolex and sold it... so freaking expensive to service ($5-600). The seiko movements are amazing! They keep excellent time, and cost next to nothing to own. Rolex is nothing more than a status symbol. Seikos are high quality watches for the masses, and I swear by them.
Which would I buy?
The Rolex is beautiful but even if I could afford one I wouldn't enjoy it. I wouldn't dare wear it because I'd fear damaging it or being mugged for it. That means it'd just live its life as a cabinet queen and I don't see the point of that.
The SteelDive is amazing value for money but I wouldn't be able to shake the 'guy in a cheap fake Rolex' stigma.
So my answer is I'd buy neither.
you should check out the San Martin SN019, even better quality than the Steeldive.
Clearly the steeldive is a superior watch 😊😊😊
@@stableianF1oracle of course it isn't.. but on an value basis,.it's punching above it's cost.
Thanks for a good review.
My pleasure!
Ty
The Watch looks amazing, but this logo is so ugly 😅. But I got mine! Just waiting Aliexpress
To be honest, the Steeldive one has an ar coating, but is not impressive.
Thank you
That's a pleasure mate...hope you enjoyed it
Rolex for your glass cabinet, SD for your night out in case you got mugged by spooks.
Great review with great insights
Much appreciated!