7 Things You (Probably) Didn’t Know About Roger Rabbit!

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 1 ноя 2024
  • КиноКино

Комментарии • 959

  • @PhatsMahoney88
    @PhatsMahoney88 8 лет назад +194

    I love this film because it is the perfect representation of a bygone era. Never will we see a PIxar/Dreamworks crossover and we can probably bet that hand drawn animation has gone the way of the dodo. And while yeah, everyone wanted their own characters represented equally and dollar amounts were argued, I still feel like the film was made for the fans. So hell yeah, let's have a part 2.

    • @alexbiersner3350
      @alexbiersner3350 6 лет назад +3

      Phats Mahoney I'm all for it. One if the novels pits the remaining Weasels that weren't in the film try to reincarnate Doom. Or maybe, somehow, have a reboot? Or, maybe just make a noir style movie that strictly follows Who Censored Roger Rabbit

    • @no_nameyouknow
      @no_nameyouknow 5 лет назад +5

      Hand drawn animation still happens, it is just hand drawn onto a computer. Most of the time the look is also different, but you could get this exact look, and have it be done 'by hand' with a computer. Cuphead looks great, there are still anime that have that hand drawn look, and while the big american animation is all cgi now, you never know what the future holds.

    • @dave101t
      @dave101t 5 лет назад +2

      never? there was a time when sega games would never be on a sony/nintendo console....

    • @WildeFyre69
      @WildeFyre69 5 лет назад

      @@dave101t Things change, some more unexpected than others! Cheers!

  • @ashram52
    @ashram52 7 лет назад +185

    You missed the most important thing: Who "actually" framed Roger Rabbit? They do answer that in the film, though somewhat secretively.
    Now there is the obvious answer that it was "Judge Doom" and that is correct. However, who was Judge Doom under his human mask? They point out at the end of the film that he had been a cartoon character, but they don't point out exactly who he was. Or did they? If you watch the scene near the end of the movie where R.K. Maroon is shot in his office and you pay close attention to what is hanging on the walls in his office there is a poster in the background. It is for a very odd character named "Pistol Packing Possum". He is a nasty looking critter and one would question why such a character would be lingering in the background of the film. He seems out of place.
    He has red eyes and an evil "villainous" smile. Valiant pointed out that his brother's killer's eye were red. When we see the eye color when Doom's fake eyes pop out we note that they are also red. In addition, the character in the poster is holding a pistol that is exactly like the one judge Doom uses moments later to kill R.K. Maroon before he can expose who is the one behind everything. This is not merely a coincidence, it's a hint. Though the poster, we can deduce that Pistol Packing Possum had also been a cartoon character who had previously worked for his studio and therefore R.K. Maroon would have know who he was and could expose him. He was killed moments before he could tell Valiant exactly that.
    All this evidence points to one inescapable truth: Pistol Packing Possum is Who Framed Roger Rabbit.

    • @zt1053
      @zt1053 5 лет назад +4

      One of the tv spots kind of gave it away that is was judge doom but from the moment you saw him it was obvious he was the antagonist.

    • @mightyshelf3520
      @mightyshelf3520 5 лет назад +5

      OP- You sir are a genius!

    • @nigerianwaffles205
      @nigerianwaffles205 5 лет назад +5

      You are truly a genius, but can you find out “Who killed captain Alex?”

    • @SquishyZoran
      @SquishyZoran 5 лет назад

      When I was little I never put it together and I thought Doom simply had the same model of gun.

    • @sarahpfeuffer1396
      @sarahpfeuffer1396 5 лет назад

      Nice! Thank you!

  • @YuTubrz
    @YuTubrz 9 лет назад +621

    Part 2 please!

    • @jiperlyjiggs7673
      @jiperlyjiggs7673 9 лет назад +1

      +YuTubrz isnt this part 2 already? Part three please

    • @lupiv5176
      @lupiv5176 9 лет назад +4

      +Jiperly Jiggs This is part 1

    • @SteveJonesGamingGWO
      @SteveJonesGamingGWO 9 лет назад +14

      P-p-p-pp-p-please

    • @ericmedina2251
      @ericmedina2251 9 лет назад +2

      it's too hard to be thinking about #savethechildren when I'm too busy thinking about DAT ass.

    • @grindstone4910
      @grindstone4910 9 лет назад +4

      +YuTubrz MOAR

  • @CAWGregoryBlack
    @CAWGregoryBlack 9 лет назад +155

    I know a few that weren't mentioned in the video....
    1. During the chase with The Toon Patrol (The Weasels), Bob Hoskins was animated to gain the shots they could not with a live action actor.
    2. Christopher Lloyd trained himself to never blink while being Judge Doom to make him more menacing.
    3. Judge Doom was originally going to be said to be the hunter that killed Bambi's mom.
    4. There were two additional weasels that were supposed to be part of The Toon Patrol named Flasher and Slimy. Slimy was deemed too disgusting and Flasher was seen as too risque due to him dressed like a flasher.
    5. Clues in earlier parts of the movie indicate Judge Doom was a toon. He put gloves on to drop the toon shoe into The Dip and when Eddie spilled The Dip in the bar, Doom backed up quickly.
    6. Baby Herman's line from the movie was altered from the book Who Censored Roger Rabbit. In the book, he says he's a 36 year old with a three year old dinky while in the movie, he says 56.
    7. Bill Murray was originally cast as Eddie Valiant but due to Bill Murray's method of accepting parts, he missed the boat.

    • @MNIMnoob
      @MNIMnoob 9 лет назад +2

      I thought it was implied that Judge Doom not blinking is a foreshadow of him being a toon

    • @CAWGregoryBlack
      @CAWGregoryBlack 9 лет назад +2

      +MNIMnoob It was but the fact that he couldn't touch Dip proved the point even more so.

    • @nicanornunez9787
      @nicanornunez9787 9 лет назад +1

      +Gregory Black Toons are a metaphor for afroamericans.

    • @CAWGregoryBlack
      @CAWGregoryBlack 9 лет назад

      Nicanor Núñez Yeah, I remember reading that.

    • @kaylamorello5478
      @kaylamorello5478 8 лет назад +4

      +Gregory Black also his cape moved all the time. even inside

  • @ReverendTed
    @ReverendTed 8 лет назад +173

    0:34 - "Anyway, this is a family show, so no more crotch-talk."
    5:45 - Well, so much for THAT.

  • @rjtp2552
    @rjtp2552 9 лет назад +22

    And what makes the animators even more surprising is that the actor for Eddie Valient made a mistake near the end of the film.
    During the scene when they drive to Maroon Cartoon Studios at night and Roger backed himself against the wall, it wasn't supposed to happen. The actor for Eddie was looking at the wall his height, where he was supposed to be looking down to Roger's height.
    The animators saw this and knew that it was already too late to re-shoot, so what did they do?
    They stretched him on his toes to match the eye level of the "mistake".
    This was mentioned in an animators guide book that I saw. Written by one of the animators of
    'Who framed Roger Rabbit'

  • @theheroesofcrash311
    @theheroesofcrash311 9 лет назад +27

    Very impressive. You went over facts that even The Nostalgia Critic didn't include in his "What You Never Knew" episode where he gave the top 11 things you never knew about Who Framed Roger Rabbit.
    If you do a part two, I think that this deserves a mention: While quite a few people know that Bugs, Daffy, and other Looney Tunes characters are voiced by their original voice actor, Mel Blanc, for this film, few people know that Betty Boop was voiced by Mae Questel - one of her original voice actresses, who was eighty years old at the time. Eddie Valiant was right... she's still got it.

  • @roycehamel6754
    @roycehamel6754 5 лет назад +11

    Just want to point out that not only did the actors "mime" their roles, crude animatronics were built as well to make the scenes work better: Roger and breaking the plates over his head, the scene in the apartment with the gun, and also Roger in the sink...there was a lot of technical achievements beyond the hand-animation.
    "Bumping the lamp" is an actual industry standard now.

  • @jodypschaeffer
    @jodypschaeffer 9 лет назад +33

    This just reaffirms for me how awesome Bob Hoskins was.

  • @Konani_the_unicorn_queen
    @Konani_the_unicorn_queen 8 лет назад +20

    "I'm not bad, i'm just drawn that way"
    -And voiced that way.

  • @vaylonkenadell
    @vaylonkenadell 8 лет назад +6

    Judge Doom's cloak moves all the time as if blown by a breeze, even when inside buildings -- a subtle vaudevillian hint that he is, in fact, a toon himself.

  • @sleepystories8958
    @sleepystories8958 Год назад +1

    This film is perfect example to amazing animation/live action films and also it fits on what's happening today to the animation of today

  • @Bethelightjourney
    @Bethelightjourney 5 лет назад +14

    Charles Fleischer, also the “save the clock tower” guy in Back to the Future 2

    • @matthewdove5528
      @matthewdove5528 4 года назад

      He was also the sleep clinic doctor in "A Nightmare on Elm Street"

  • @nightsitter
    @nightsitter 7 лет назад +1

    Thanks to all who put in the effort for the film. It’s pivotal for a generation.

  • @ravenvince2
    @ravenvince2 8 лет назад +61

    Mel Blanc also returned to do some of the voices.

    • @chadbuice2636
      @chadbuice2636 8 лет назад +1

      Really?

    • @ravenvince2
      @ravenvince2 8 лет назад +2

      Josh Buice yes he did.

    • @Eidlones
      @Eidlones 7 лет назад +6

      Vincent Laughton He did all of them except for Yosemite​ Sam and Sylvester, I believe. They put too much strain on his voice.

    • @sbarrow06
      @sbarrow06 6 лет назад +2

      And then he died

    • @amojak
      @amojak 4 года назад +3

      @@sbarrow06 Mel Blanc will never die, his voices will go on forever

  • @DrDolan2000
    @DrDolan2000 3 года назад +2

    I can only imagine the hell those animators went through to bring this movie together. Hand cramps, lack of sleep, redesigns. Thank you, everyone on the animation department

  • @ABeardedDad
    @ABeardedDad 9 лет назад +4

    Roger Rabbit is awesome, and now I have even more respect for it.. not to mention a new respect for the amazing bravado and creativity of pre-CG Hollywood.
    Oh and PART 2 PART 2 PART 2!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @linkfan160
    @linkfan160 5 лет назад +1

    This movie should get like some kind of honourary award for "Most work ever put into a single film"

  • @peterward2275
    @peterward2275 5 лет назад +3

    The title can be taken as a statement, since the film does not end with the question, but explores and answers it.

    • @jimmyjimy1
      @jimmyjimy1 5 лет назад +1

      I was thinking the same thing. It wasnt asking who framed him, it's more saying "this is who framed roger rabbit" without that exact wording

  • @claytongross5657
    @claytongross5657 2 года назад +1

    BEYOND FANTASTIC MOVIE. I saw this in the theater opening weekend and it was a mad house. The 743 people that made this movie are AWESOME and thank you for making it. The guy in the Roger rabbit suite was EPIC because he WAS Roger and I thank you sir for doing the voice. Bob was an AMAZING ACTOR, RIP. This movie and Hook were my two favorites that he did. Smead, Smeads me, what about Smead. Damn that was a great movie too.

  • @kingkelevra4545
    @kingkelevra4545 9 лет назад +5

    Part 2 of Who Framed Roger Rabbit would be awesome!!

  • @lordtesram4499
    @lordtesram4499 9 лет назад +2

    over 80,000 frames of animation. I'm still blown away by that

  • @cornishphilosopher
    @cornishphilosopher 9 лет назад +3

    Who framed Roger Rabbit is one of my favourite films ever

  • @baboom007
    @baboom007 5 лет назад +1

    Kudos to all people involved in this movie. Magnificent and hard work.

  • @felphero
    @felphero 9 лет назад +7

    REALLY REALLY REEEEEALLY WANT A PART 2...and 3 and 4

    • @ripjaw105
      @ripjaw105 9 лет назад

      You know what, let's make it its own series.

  • @LorenHelgeson
    @LorenHelgeson 9 лет назад +1

    As a kid, I saw the documentary on this that came out around the time the movie was in theaters. Item #2 on your list always stood out for me, even then, as a very amazing feat. It's very impressive what they pulled off.

  • @dru-is-here
    @dru-is-here 7 лет назад +3

    Yes, a part 2 would be greatly appreciated

  • @NipItInTheBud100
    @NipItInTheBud100 8 лет назад +1

    These are the videos I love from Cinefix! Hells to the yeah for a part 2!!! Keep up the good work! You all must love your jobs getting to talk about movies for a living!

  • @BMoneyrulz
    @BMoneyrulz 9 лет назад +25

    Thanks! Great episode!

  • @ohair87
    @ohair87 9 лет назад +1

    Of course we want a part 2. This is one of the greatest movies of all time.

  • @jonathanmartinez5050
    @jonathanmartinez5050 9 лет назад +8

    Though I'd love to see a part 2 for this, I think it'd be really cool to at some point see an episode of What's The Difference between this movie and the novel it's based on, Who Censored Roger Rabbit

    • @xianartman
      @xianartman 6 лет назад +1

      Jonathan Martinez it does exist now actually

  • @AlexMegremis
    @AlexMegremis 9 лет назад +1

    Definitely part 2, please.

  • @TEKKENKING23
    @TEKKENKING23 5 лет назад +4

    who framed Rodger rabbit introduced me to my first cartoon Crush Jessica Rabbit.

  • @MFPhoto1
    @MFPhoto1 5 лет назад +1

    I am impressed by the amount of work that had to go into the animation. Even more so with the difficulty for the live actors working off animated characters who were not really there on set. It was a lot of hard work, but worth it.

    • @jb888888888
      @jb888888888 2 года назад

      Damn primadonna animated characters, refusing to work with live actors on set. That's racist!

  • @reinelfarinad6671
    @reinelfarinad6671 9 лет назад +209

    Part 222222222222222222222

    • @CineFix
      @CineFix  9 лет назад +14

      +Reinel Farinad Well, maybe we'll get there. But we'll have to do 222222222222222222220 other parts in between. And that's a lot! ;)

    • @mistercellophane1269
      @mistercellophane1269 9 лет назад +1

      +CineFix How about part 2?

    • @jeffreycoogan09
      @jeffreycoogan09 9 лет назад +2

      +CineFix Will there is one fact that you missed. Who Framed Roger Rabbit was based on Gary K. Wolf's 1981 novel Who Censored Roger Rabbit?

    • @tianapitesr8553
      @tianapitesr8553 9 лет назад

      +Reinel Farinad Any of you see how Problem Child' was spawned from this unfortunately?

    • @TLDsProductions
      @TLDsProductions 9 лет назад

      +Reinel Farinad Pleeeeeasssssseeee...

  • @mitchellcatterson4216
    @mitchellcatterson4216 9 лет назад +1

    I love who framed roger rabbit so much

  • @DirtCheapFU
    @DirtCheapFU 5 лет назад +4

    The dueling pianos and Betty boop was my favorite scene.

    • @davidwesley2525
      @davidwesley2525 3 года назад

      BETTY BOOP is my favorite Cameo.🤩🤩🤩❤❤❤

  • @unorthodoxJ
    @unorthodoxJ 9 лет назад +1

    I always like the theories of Who Framed Roger Rabbit being a spiritual sequel to The Third Man
    It has all the same noir-esque mysteries of who and why is dismantling the public works system, just adds in some toons for flavor.

  • @ninefangthesniper
    @ninefangthesniper 9 лет назад +44

    Can we get a What's the difference: Roger Rabbit

    • @ohair87
      @ohair87 9 лет назад +2

      +Alec Mason Well, seeing as the movie isn't directly based on the book, there would be a LOT of differences, the main one being the entire plot of the story. Also, the whole toons talking in speech bubbles and the duplicate thing.

    • @igloocookie
      @igloocookie 9 лет назад +1

      +Alec Mason Yeah, the book is almost an alien compared to the film. They deal with such different themes and the characterizations are vastly different...as well as most of the characters. The only things the book and film actually have in common is the title, 3 or 4 character names (their personalities aren't similar though), and that it's a noir-style mystery.

    • @shadow_raven1983
      @shadow_raven1983 8 лет назад +1

      The book in question is called Who censored Roger Rabbit. Only 4 characters make it to the film: Roger, Eddie, Jessica and Baby Herman although it could be argued the murder of Marvin Acme and whether Roger did it is similar to one of the deaths in the book.
      In reference to bigevilworldwide1's book, after the release of the film, he did not change his original book to follow the film. However, he did release 3 more in the series, Who P-p-p-plugged Roger Rabbit?, The Road to Toontown and Who Wacked Roger Rabbit? and in these three books, there are elements from the film such as the mentioning of Judge Doom and with WWRR, DIP becomes important in the story. They do resemble more of WFRR more and whilst are dark, are more zany just like the film. I swear, I have all 4 books on my Kindle and I loved reading them over and over. I'd highly recommend them. With all 4 books, there is not mucyh linking one book to the next but who cares? It's Toontown!!!!

  • @voodoofairy
    @voodoofairy 8 лет назад +1

    This was really well done and I could watch Roger Rabbit trivia ALL day. Make as many follow up videos as you can stand!

  • @Draggo88
    @Draggo88 9 лет назад +2

    I loved this movie as a child, and still do! Thank you for making it more interesting for me!

  • @TehBurek
    @TehBurek 9 лет назад +11

    About that missing question mark in the title - isn't there some kind of superstition in Hollywood against putting question and exclamation marks in your movie title? I think I read that somewhere.

  • @Riz2336
    @Riz2336 9 лет назад +1

    Hell yeah I want a part 2. Who Framed Roger Rabbit is my favorite animated movie.

  • @cas9564
    @cas9564 9 лет назад +31

    7 Things You Didn't Know About Cinefix?

  • @mightyshelf3520
    @mightyshelf3520 5 лет назад +1

    DO A PART 2!!!! Down the rabbit hole we go!!

  • @tedioustotoro4885
    @tedioustotoro4885 9 лет назад +99

    Part deux

  • @BaghaShams
    @BaghaShams 5 лет назад +1

    As a kid, I always felt like Roger Rabbit was an actual character from past cartoons. I guess that just speaks to how well they designed him by borrowing elements from other characters.

  • @Salvypapi87
    @Salvypapi87 8 лет назад +11

    yes part 2 plz... & don't b stingy with the facts or we'll ask for part 3 lol

  • @suikodudeman
    @suikodudeman 9 лет назад +1

    Extra fun fact: Bill Murray was initially offered the role of Eddie Valiant. However, since Bill has no agent but picks and chooses his roles after listening to pitches left on an answering machine (which has its own 1-800 number), he didn't know he had the message as it got lost in a flood of other messages, and thus the part went to Bob Hoskins. Years later when he found out about this, Bill said he would've loved to have the role and laments the miss opportunity.

  • @TheDoctorCog
    @TheDoctorCog 9 лет назад +11

    Part 2 please! :P

  • @bdwitt66
    @bdwitt66 7 лет назад +1

    Great film. It really demonstrates how really working hard on special effects is always better than trying to do it cheaper and faster with newer methods. All the animation and effects hold up today beautifully.

  • @chrisklecker
    @chrisklecker 7 лет назад +3

    A small tidbit shown here that many people may not know. Bob Hopkins is British. He does one of the best American accents though for this movie.

  • @michaelschmidt6242
    @michaelschmidt6242 9 лет назад +1

    part two please, this was great

  • @linganore123
    @linganore123 9 лет назад +5

    PART 2 PLEASE

  • @NekoMouser
    @NekoMouser 9 лет назад +1

    Fun facts about the books...the one it is based off of is basically totally different. Roger works in comic strips where he is photographed for panels, not movies. The plot centers largely around some incriminating negatives and studio control. Also, he can't talk. Not outloud. Instead, words appear in talk balloons above his head and are read by Eddie. Toons can also make short-term duplicates of themselves and Jessica, though married to him, isn't in love with him. After the success of the movie, two more books were written, but they retconned the first book into basically "a dream" that Roger had and utilized the style, plot, and other elements of the movies to define the world (and aren't as good or original as the first one).

  • @anaverageyoutubeuser
    @anaverageyoutubeuser 9 лет назад +4

    Tiny Toon Adventures please! For its 25th aniversary.

  • @OneFreemanC17
    @OneFreemanC17 9 лет назад +1

    Part 2! You need to talk about Eddy's past that's put on display throughout the film

  • @IMarcMan
    @IMarcMan 9 лет назад +3

    Where do you get all these facts? It's incredible! Wowza!

    • @snow_blind_08
      @snow_blind_08 9 лет назад +1

      +Mr L. Possibly from the trivia section of IMBD or the International Movie Database. That's where I'd look.

    • @angeloszormpas8427
      @angeloszormpas8427 9 лет назад +1

      Movie commentary

  • @caole88
    @caole88 7 лет назад +1

    A great movie!!! Such dedication to complete this great movie ❤️❤️❤️

  • @TheSpiderjaws
    @TheSpiderjaws 8 лет назад +62

    Roger Rabbit: A Telltale Game Series.
    Let's begin.

    • @MaCabaret
      @MaCabaret 8 лет назад +2

      TheSpiderjaws I just came.

    • @XatolosWired
      @XatolosWired 8 лет назад +10

      The original book (Who Censored Roger Rabbit) would make for a better version of a Telltale game, but Jessica got a major re-write for the movie and would cause fans to be confused (or angry)

  • @MrWWErocks2000
    @MrWWErocks2000 9 лет назад +1

    Id be up for a part two right now!

  • @Truth83
    @Truth83 8 лет назад +7

    Christopher Lloyd decided not to blink at all during his takes to make his character more menacing

    • @sk8rpunkbarbie
      @sk8rpunkbarbie 5 лет назад +1

      I met Christopher several year ago I told him how the judge scared living day lights out if me as a kid he gave me a big hug and said I'm.sorry hes a lovely guy

    • @jcharmaine1
      @jcharmaine1 2 года назад

      @@sk8rpunkbarbie cool!

  • @Lightlydock
    @Lightlydock 8 лет назад +1

    Would love to see a part 2!

  • @nightwing245
    @nightwing245 9 лет назад +16

    Do a 7 Things You Didn't Know About Scott Pilgrim VS The World!

  • @remyjones9146
    @remyjones9146 4 года назад +1

    I’d totally be up for a part 2

  • @dimitrit7504
    @dimitrit7504 9 лет назад +5

    Do Blues Brothers !!!!!

  • @EinhornIsAMann
    @EinhornIsAMann 9 лет назад +1

    we need a part two please!

  • @AFMountaineer2000
    @AFMountaineer2000 6 лет назад +4

    When Judge Doom revealed he was a toon at the end scared me a lot when I was a kid

    • @leonardmosca3754
      @leonardmosca3754 5 лет назад

      At the end when judge Doom transform into his toon form I jumped on the seat😱

  • @pooyouiamawesome8039
    @pooyouiamawesome8039 9 лет назад +1

    I would love a part two please!!!

  • @liamshields7731
    @liamshields7731 9 лет назад +130

    THINGS YOU DIDN"T KNOW ABOUT STAR WARS!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • @maxalaniz365634
      @maxalaniz365634 9 лет назад

      Oh yes Star wars.!!

    • @liamshields7731
      @liamshields7731 9 лет назад +2

      Max Alaniz I can't believe they haven't done it yet!

    • @itayeldad3317
      @itayeldad3317 9 лет назад +3

      They'll probably will when EP 7 will come out

    • @nickzadrafieha5940
      @nickzadrafieha5940 9 лет назад +2

      +Itay ELDAD I think it's because everyone already knows everything about Star Wars

    • @liamshields7731
      @liamshields7731 9 лет назад

      Nickzad Rafieha True

  • @Musketeer3
    @Musketeer3 9 лет назад +1

    Awesome! Do a part 2 please.
    This is one of the rare "movie lists of things you didn't know" on the internet from which I actually didn't know any.

  • @chibizeru6529
    @chibizeru6529 8 лет назад +4

    I realy found that movie scary as a kid

    • @leonardmosca3754
      @leonardmosca3754 5 лет назад

      Well I first saw it I was scared to was a kid Judge Doom's freak me out especially when transformed into his toon self I hid in the seat in the movie theater I'm going to ashamed to admit it

  • @Scripture-Man
    @Scripture-Man 6 лет назад +1

    The clips in this video look great! I grew up watching this on VHS, so it's great to see this in high quality widescreen :) Would like to see the film again one day on blu-ray.

  • @TurfShark
    @TurfShark 9 лет назад +3

    Do a WHATS THE DIFFERENCE between this and the BOOK!

  • @adguy70
    @adguy70 8 лет назад +4

    This was in 1947 and the penguin waiters are from 1954 in Mary Poppins !

  • @sagefoole
    @sagefoole 8 лет назад +1

    Another groundbreaking, trailblazing and timeless movie.

  • @SteampunkCentral
    @SteampunkCentral 9 лет назад +9

    You forgot to mention that this is based on a novel. Unless you are planning to make a What's The Difference: Who Frame Roger Rabbit. :O

  • @Warkonst
    @Warkonst 8 лет назад +1

    A part 2 would be nice.
    I like everything about this movie and would like to know everything as well.

  • @paulkielty8385
    @paulkielty8385 7 лет назад +4

    I still can't watch this movie because as a child I cried when the boot is put in the dip.

  • @morphman86
    @morphman86 9 лет назад +2

    There are so many things about this movie, that I really think you should do at least one more of these.
    My favorite fact that you missed is that Tim Curry was originally going to play Judge Doom, but test screenings with kids made the kids cry. They found him too scary, so they decided to go with Christopher Lloyd instead.
    That's the second time in Curry's career the same thing happened. He was the original actor for The Joker in the animated Batman series, but test screenings of the first four episodes had kids crying in fear, and once again, he got replaced. This time with Mark Hamill.

    • @BritishPaz49
      @BritishPaz49 Год назад

      How can a voiceover for a cartoon make kids cry?

  • @RDeathmark
    @RDeathmark 9 лет назад +10

    wait,...roger had a voice actor? and was animated?,...that's where your three years of acting school went my friend, i may know on a purely logical level roger isn't real, but each time i watch that movie he is indistinguishable from eddie for realism to me in that moment.

    • @TaylorOnyx123
      @TaylorOnyx123 9 лет назад +4

      +RDeathmark The man was wearing a rabbit suit you don't think he loved his work on that movie? He was making a funny...

    • @CuppaLLX
      @CuppaLLX 9 лет назад +1

      +Twisted Toon Taylor being the (second) most beloved cartoon rabbit doesnt hurt either

    • @roguecactus7
      @roguecactus7 9 лет назад +4

      He's not dumb, he's just drawn that way. 😜

  • @hpa2005
    @hpa2005 5 лет назад +1

    Believe it or not: Tim Curry and John Cleese both auditioned for/expressed interest in the role of Judge Doom. Tim Curry did an audition, but was turned down after Robert Zemeckis, Steven Spielberg, Jeffrey Katzenberg, and Michael Eisner each found his audition too terrifying. John Cleese was turned down as Steven Spielberg and Robert Zemeckis thought that nobody would take a former member of Monty Python seriously as a sadistic villain.

  • @BrendanTheGent
    @BrendanTheGent 7 лет назад +77

    cgi sucks, cartoons, and puppets are the way to go

    • @spider-insider7981
      @spider-insider7981 7 лет назад +10

      BrendanTheGent cgi dosen't suck if you use it the right way, (look at jurassic park)

    • @BrendanTheGent
      @BrendanTheGent 7 лет назад +3

      you got me there, it was mixed with puppets. good movie

    • @calebmayfield8474
      @calebmayfield8474 7 лет назад +9

      BrendanTheGent Cgi takes time and effort, most studios don't do that so it looks like shit. When they put the time and effort in it looks amazing.

    • @tiagotiagot
      @tiagotiagot 7 лет назад +4

      You think CGI sucks because you only notice when it sucks.

    • @Bean56_
      @Bean56_ 7 лет назад +2

      BrendanTheGent well sadly when Jim Henson passed away I think movies using puppets also died because they knew they were not going to be as kick ass. And of course CGI is probably just cheaper and faster.

  • @polyluxus
    @polyluxus 9 лет назад +2

    Thank You!
    That was over before it began O.o Part two please!

  • @marcelodcs1
    @marcelodcs1 9 лет назад +4

    Things you didnt know about Cool World (Ralph Bakshi)

  • @michaelcain9324
    @michaelcain9324 6 лет назад +1

    Yes, part 2!

  • @jasonmoore710
    @jasonmoore710 8 лет назад +3

    why no mention of the inclusion of the racist joke? During the Donald / Daffy piano duel, listen to what Donald says just before he throws Daffy into the piano.

    • @NuclearJesusMan
      @NuclearJesusMan 8 лет назад +8

      Because it's an urban legend. Donald says something to the effect of "Doggone no good so and so," but his incomprehensible voice muddled things to where it sounded like something else.
      Donald's voice actor was one of the original Donald voice actors, and would have refused the part if a racial slur was included. this has been debunked many times by cast and crew.

    • @jasonmoore710
      @jasonmoore710 8 лет назад +1

      Nuclear Jesus Sounds pretty clear to me....

    • @jrpetersjr
      @jrpetersjr 8 лет назад

      Sounds like you won't change your mind no matter what.

    • @NuclearJesusMan
      @NuclearJesusMan 8 лет назад

      +Jason Moore Sounds like at this point, you're hearing what you want to hear.

    • @jasonmoore710
      @jasonmoore710 8 лет назад +1

      Nuclear Jesus Google it. I'm far from the only one that hears it.

  • @noni_mus
    @noni_mus 8 лет назад +1

    If Steven Spielberg had that kind of pull for Roger Rabbit, I'm hoping he would have that same power to do all the references in Ready Player One

  • @mrtraviskrimble2956
    @mrtraviskrimble2956 9 лет назад +2

    I would Love a part 2!

  • @marcjoseph9448
    @marcjoseph9448 9 лет назад +2

    "I'm a rabbit. Three Years of acting school,and I'm a rabbit." - Charles Fleischer (1987)
    XD

  • @CinemaZiggy
    @CinemaZiggy 9 лет назад +2

    Part 2, we need that

  • @davidt-rex2062
    @davidt-rex2062 9 лет назад

    The BEST FILM EVER! - Part 2 please!

  • @TranqBase
    @TranqBase 9 лет назад

    Definitely do a part 2!!

  • @grindstone4910
    @grindstone4910 9 лет назад

    Part 2 Part 2 Part 2!!
    One of my favorite movies of all time.

  • @pashtunchannel1038
    @pashtunchannel1038 5 лет назад

    I grew up watching this. Lovely memories 😢

  • @suntsutoriden
    @suntsutoriden 9 лет назад +1

    More Roger Rabbit would be awesome, but I feel if you started on Star Wars, you'd probably have to start its own channel. Ol' GL may have been proper crazy, but he did a lot of cool and interesting things that completely changed film-making.

  • @joespicer849
    @joespicer849 9 лет назад

    We need Part 2 of Who Framed Roger Rabbit in our lives....P-p-p-p-p-p-please, CineFix!

  • @LeoandLamb
    @LeoandLamb 9 лет назад +2

    You guys should REALLY do a "What's the Differance?" Between this movie and the book it's based on, "Who Censored Roger Rabbit?". Especially considering it's many differences and how dark the book is. PLEEEEEEAAAAASE? :)

  • @KieranMajury
    @KieranMajury 9 лет назад +2

    Yes to a Part2 and to be cheeky can we get a What's The Difference (don't know whether to put a question mark on this, thanks Zemeckis)

  • @Nitro1000
    @Nitro1000 6 лет назад

    Definitely want a part 2