Mercedes EQS 580 4Matic range test
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 8 дек 2021
- Get 30 day free Premium trial on ABRP by using referral code "Teslabjorn":
abetterrouteplanner.com/ref/t...
Get 20 % discount (also works on discounted prices) when ordering from Stormberg online by using discount code "Teslabjorn":
www.stormberg.com/no/kampanje...
Kempower make awesome EV chargers:
kempower.com/teslabjorn/
Want to sell your Tesla/EV? marcusbil.no/selge-bilen/?utm...
Want to buy a Tesla/EV? marcusbil.no/biler-til-salgs/...
Leasing a Tesla/EV? marcusbil.no/leasing/?...
MisterGreen EV leasing:
mstr.gr/bjornnyland
Results from my range tests, banana box tests and other goodies here:
docs.google.com/spreadsheets/...
Main folder with everything:
drive.google.com/open?id=1HOw...
ScanMyTesla app for showing battery temperature, etc:
play.google.com/store/apps/de...
/ scanmytesla
www.e-mobility-driving-soluti...
www.e-mobility-driving-soluti...
The OBD dongle I use in Tesla, Leaf, Ioniq, e-Niro, e-Soul, i3, ID3/ID4 (Android only):
www.obdlink.com/products/obdl...
My Artlist playlist:
artlist.io/mycollection/24628...
Most of my music is from Artlist.io. If you sign up for one year and use my referral link, you will get two months free:
artlist.io/artlist-70446/?art...
Donation links:
streamlabs.com/bjrnnyland
/ teslabjorn
My live channel:
/ teslabjornlive24
Teslabjørn Discord server:
/ discord
Reduce food waste and get great deals on food:
toogoodtogo.no/ 
Авто/Мото
Don't get too used to the luxury. We're expecting the Dacia Spring 1000km challenge next!
oooof..... hell.... that thing has really shitty charging.... its a premier daily car for the price, but long distance? daaaamn no
I like your style!
😂😂😂😂😂😂
Get the fiat e500 if we are at it. Those cars are for city only. I wouldn't go more than 100 km in one without a break.
It will only take 27 hours 😁
Love Bjørn already thinking about how to sleep in an EQS. That what MB made this car for 😉
Mercedes: "You don't sleep in an EQS! You sleep in a hotel room!! Or a mansion!!" (You have to read it in a German accent for the full experience.)
@@erdinch6315 It's not that soporific. I once played Beck's Sea Change near the end of a 17-hour drive -- now that was a bad idea.
Bjorn: how you suppose to sleep in here..
Mercedes eqs driver: not! We buy a hotel
You mean
EQS driver: The driver can sleep in the car, I own the hotel at the next stop.
That infotainment and its responsivness reminds me of standalone nav tablets from 2010.
I love opening the front hood to marvel at the engineering and to add blinker fluid.
@@abraxastulammo9940 no it has the 90 degree workshop Position.
mmm I though blinker fluid is only needed in BMWs ;)
Don’t forget the tunable Johnson rod
Love that you are testing the audio systems as well! And doing it properly with uncompressed/lossless files. 👍
Efficiency is very disappointing. Tesla is still the King of efficiency and big range.
Mercedes S owners have never cared about efficiency. They have the money to pay for the high speed electrons. With a range longer than a comfortable long distance journey driving leg, efficiency is irrelevant.
No, the charge port on the left hand side of the car is NOT the correct side. In continental Europe where you usually park on the right hand side of the street when you do curbside parking and you want to do charging, it is shieeeet with a charge port on the left.
Or you could face the car the other way, then the charge port would be on the correct side.
@@dogbreath6974 You are not always allowed to park facing the other direction.
So happy you are now testing the sound systems too, it's something no other car reviewer really talks about but is so important to me when I decide which car to buy.
Thanks for the feedback :)
Savage geese is the only channel to make the fft plots of a sound system
Savage Geese tests the sound systems with special equipment in a lot of reviews, just fyi:)
When I see my car , different manufactor, and see the difference between using 19" and 21" rims, Mecedes does a very good job. 8 to 10% more range with the smaller rims. Luxury and efficiency and you can buy it :) if the wallet is big enough.
good charge port location, far better for curb charging, so nice
Nice test Bjørn! I was testing this EQS580 about 2 weeks ago and it made a great impression! I`m driving a Tesla X 100D, and this is the first car that just blow me away, since Tesla X came (but there is things I dont like about X also!). Accelaration 0-100 km/h 4,3 sec is fantastic for a car this heavy. Long range capacity is a ++. Stereo and massage in the seats was nice, head up very good, suspension was even better than Audi Q7. Everything just gave me a good feeling when driving this car! But, I need a SUV, and MB EQS is not, and then it was the price. 1,4 mill NOK!! But again, this car is a new league!! Looking forward to the SUV coming!!
A great episode, Bjorn.
Great result in winter.
I would argue that Tesla Model S with nominal tire pressure empty at 45 psi 19" and 42 psi 21" has an edge over the 38 psi EQS use, especially the Hakka R3 will benefit from higher pressure regarding consumption and driving feel. On the other hand, the Tesla's higher than usual tire pressure also reduce comfort and increase noise.
EQS is also 400 kg heavier and much better leg room than Model S with similar boot space.
Thanks for sharing! I feel like this video pretty much sums up, what the issue is with the hysteria for ever bigger range. Even on long range travel, you don’t use utilize it. You have to stop anyway to pee. And you pay for it with immensely higher weight.
Exactly! Well said. The only issue then is the capacity of the public charging network, for 5% of drivers that are road warriors and when many people are making more longer journeys eg, holidays. For most drivers, most of the time, driving average journeys (less than 10 miles in the UK for the last 20 years) they will charge at home so it is not an issue at all.
the Range on this thing is humongous.
A guy from germany test drove the car from munich to berlin which was roughly 550km.
He didnt drive slow but iirc not more than 150 km/h (the car is really aerodynamic!) but he made the trip without charging once.
Close call with 18km range left and it was during late summer, so perfect temperatur for energy saving but he did make it there without pluggin in once.
but it was a lie
@@ranxerox10 why should it, its not like construction zones grately reduce your consumption and 1/3 of all road on the Autobahn is under construction all the time.
Also byorn got over 400km range at constant 120 km/h with the worst possible tyre+rim combination during wet roads and Winter conditions.
Squeezing out another 150km under top conditions is not too far of a stretch imo
@@DJRaffa1000 berlin is lower than munich, but as you say, its possible, but he didnt drive 150
@@DJRaffa1000 its possible because the mercedes has a big battery pack not because it is very efficent, it is not
@@ranxerox10 at higher speeds its more efficient than other EVs because of the superb drag coefficient.
And as i said byorns results are basically worst case. Not too good tyres, the worst possible rims and wet roads + low temperature
Great review as ever Bjorn!!! Loving the Elvis test! Looking forward to the following tests!
Great video TB.. Also look forward to hopefully getting your thoughts on the Lucid Air. Maybe released in Europe for 2022 I hear?
thank you MB
Another Stella vid TB, and I was hoping that the EQS would shine and MB would make a real effort to make this another benchmark product in a space that has yet to be filled. Tesla don’t need to compete here and it great to see thing moving on, and glad your loving it - in a few years things are starting to move on from your Nimba runs to where we are today.
🤣.I had a blast seeing you enjoying this car. You look like a little boy having his nicest toy. 😂
Fantastic head up display!
15:10 “do you like that sheet?” 🤣
You can change the base, mids and high’s in the sound settings, and it’s a noticeable difference.
Really want to see what this would do in summer with the more efficient rims and tires and the 2 wheel drive version. Might be a new record, although even second place is pretty impressive given how much bigger it is than the model S
While the standard MB S Class is larger than the Tesla Model S, The EQS isn't. It's slightly longer but also a bit narrower than the Tesla. The EQS interior is noticeably tighter, and the storage is much much less. And it's slower.
@@doubleclutchonline5811 the eqs is 230mm longer than the newest model s and 40mm narrower, so yes, it's significantly larger especially when you're talking volume which is cubed. Not sure where you're getting that it's less roomy inside. Hell what I've heard from pretty much every review is that there's plenty of space inside. Also typical tesla fanboi absolutely seething, talking about speed when reviewing a luxury car and making up shit about it having less interior space. A real cope
yeah probably bigger but also the netto battery is 14kWh bigger.. without that huge battery it would be pretty disappointing
among all winter tests, it's a new record
@@Elektroauto1984 I mean it's a big vehicle, the battery isn't that much bigger than the one on the model S, so it's about proportional
Just watching you navigating through features makes me mad. This car is maddening.
Your parking style still freaks me out ;)
nice test! waiting for summer records)
That heads up display with the arrows is amazing
That is what to be expected in a car with this price tag (even if Teslas most expensive cars do not have a HUD at all!!).
I have exactly the same functionality in my HUD in my 2019 ICE Mazda CX5 costing 30% of this beast
In a self driving car you don’t need head up display, you need: Netflix or RUclips or other entertainment apps
@@RuffyDotOneonly too bad no cars are self driving yet
Awesome side mirror automatic adjustments.
It’s a gimmick
I really like the EQS!
Ouch the weight! German panzer!! The consumption is good when you look at that weight. 0.2 Cd is definitely helping a lot.
7:55 it’s information about how much are the front and back wheels turned.
Holy Benz. I just freaked out with the quirks of this car. The S class is supposed to be the absolute top notch of the industry... Well they've done it again. 😵
cabin temperatur wise i have a suspicion.
In most cars when you set your temperatur to 21°C you most likely will get around 22,5 - 23 °C of real temperature (most people nowadays are suprized by how "cold" 21°C actually feels because many systems "lie" to the end user about real temperature)
And my suspicion is that the mercedes has high quality sensors and more accurate temepratur control so its closer to real 21°C then "normal"
Lol sure. Because the Mercedes feels worse I’m sure _EVERY_ other system on the planet is wrong and only Mercedes is right. Why of course. Can’t be that Mercedes just has a worse HVAC system, it’s that every single _other_ car in the world is wrong _except_ them.
"How da heck I am supposed to sleep in this car"🤣🤣🤣
Imagine S class owners actually sleeping in their cars))
Really! They would stay at a luxury hotel.
Must have a great Subwoofer in the sound system. Mercedes doing itself proud. In Hong Kong Mercedes ICE cars are not leaving the showroom, but big back order on the EQS and EQC cars. Of course. HK has lots of Mercedes fans. Money is no issue.
Great video, thank you…too expensive for me, but i will get the EQA 350. Would you consider doing a review of that car please?
“You like that shit!!???” 😂😂😂
"do you like that shit?" Bjorn Nyland 😂
EQS now homologated for Level 3 autonomous driving. World premiere. Deliveries in 2022 with Level 3 S-Class as well.
@@abraxastulammo9940 Such as the prehistoric polluting car-centered USA
I think the right side is better for charging port because you can charge next to the road sideways parking which is not possible with charge port on the left.
Concerning the efficiency of 4x4 xEvs:
I can confirm the Ionic 5 uses a clutch to disconnect the front drivetrain from the drive shaft/wheels.
You don`t need clutch. You can do it like that(a bit over-engineered) or you can use one induction motor...(like Tesla, Audi etc..)
Can you check the ‘air-quality’ tab in HVAC? I think it uses an interior and an exterior PM2.5 sensor to decide when to do fresh air intake and when to recirculate
do you have any idea if and when you will be able to review the lucid air?
Hi Bjørn, what do you use to fix your phone on the dashboard/to the windscreen? Do you also use a gimbal?
I love this car man the black doesn't look bad but the Gray with black on top yesssssss, best EV machine 😍😍😍 man i love the design and the wheels wowwwww my fav machine
Glad to see that the designers of 90’s WinAmp skins have found employment at Mercedes’ UI department.
All those lit warning lights are surprisingly unelegant while the power is on but not in drive mode.
That side mirror sensor pretty sick.
The charge port is on the correct side for us cool Brits 😁
You should make a driving songs playlist.Thanks
I'm still hearing "a bedroom planner" 😂
You should definitely try Yao Si Ting's covers and songs. Exceptional voice and sound quality!
The only problem might be if there is some copyright stuff... But you can at lest listen outside of video recording.
power limit display very good feature.
🤘Stay Awesome!
Nice car!
Hey Bjorn, are you also gonna make a video again of a trip to the extreme cold north of Norway. Will be cool to see👌🏽
Nick, I would say the winther weather in northern Norway, is NOT cold at all
@@stennordenmalm1735 really? I thought it was very cold in the area
@@nickdegroot2445 It’s probably not that cold compared to areas in Siberia or Alaska, but it’s cold enough. A week or two ago it was close to -40 inland in Finnmark.
Love Mercedes
This is going to be a long range test! you will need even more patience in summer:P
Ehh, I mean only 250 miles at 75mph/120kmph? That’s really nothing impressive or unreasonably long. I guess it did 315 if you’re going slow at like 55mph/90kmph, but that’s kinda underwhelming from a 107 kWh battery. I would’ve been impressed if it didn’t need *such* a massive battery and such low inefficiency to get these numbers.
winter range test for Raven would be interesting
Are you going to get the opportunity to test the Cupra Born, or is is unneccesary since its basically an ID3?
Can’t wait until you do the lucid
Lovely car but way out of my price range🙈. We’ve just ordered a mg zs long range and it won’t be delivered until April next year. I was hoping you’d have got your hands on one by now.
Very nice. I would to see range test with same condition like Tesla S. So with 19" and good weather. Or it will be nice to do massive EV range test with many cars. So lets wait for cloning to clone Bjorn.
No comparison. EQS 580 is a king of inefficiency... Luxury comes with the price...
jaguar i pace hse400 2021 range test 🙏🏻
I hope you will test Mercedes EQS 450+ also to see how this goes in electric range iam sure it will get better from EPA result!!!
The EPA range of German manufacturers is usually too small, as they take the less time-consuming test. The correct range is multiplied by 0.7 to simulate cold temperatures. The other method would be to run tests at every temperature and calculate these complexly with one another. In a test by Nextmove of the Taycan 4S and the Model S Raven Performance with an average speed of 110 km / h, the Porsche drove 376 km and the Model S 424 km.
@@raphi25895 Yea exactly i have understand also that German manufacturers do that, their EPA results are lower than Tesla for example but in real world they are more close. The long range taycan EPA range had around 200miles but it could do around 300 miles. Mercedes eqs 450+ i guess can do 650+ km maybe little more. I want to see Lucid Air also i think it follows Tesla method so it gonna be closer to eqs.
@@annampakodimou9197 the EQS 450+ is ratet with 780km WLTP, it could be that this one actually does the 700 km
The point you make about consumption depending on the tires and the rims is a very important one. The BMW configurator for the i4M50 shows that the range can drop up to an estimated 50Km depending on the rim/tire combination you choose. Some people don't care anyway, but it's an important one to consider for this kind of standardized tests.
Awesome car!!
And awesome video :)
Change the banana test with something more practical.
How many dead bodies does it fit in a six figure Mercedes.
Did you try the massage seats?
I didn't know you were an audiophile! Niiice.
EQS drivers dont't sleep in the car! But it could leed to problems for their chauffeurs waiting for the client in the car when the car shuts off.
2:15 the glare would piss me off on sunny days.
Out of context.
“I am going to do all with this car”
Later.. “you like this s…..?”
We should be fair it is not a big screen it is three screen under one Glas panel right?
Holy, Gorgeous !!!!!
Considering that this is probably the least efficient configuration, with all wheel drive and 21" inch 265 winter tires, in temperatures around 2-7 degrees Celsius, sometimes wet roads and that it is a big fat 5.2m long 2.7t car, the consumption is excellent.
I bet the eqs 450+ on 19 inch tires in summer will beat all current other cars in the 1000 km challenge and will only be beaten by lucid when it is available.
That consumption is not excellent lol. Name one other “high end” car, or even another sedan that gets those numbers. The only cars _that_ inefficient are overly large SUV’s or extremely inefficient outliers. These efficiency numbers are not excellent from a 107kWh battery, no matter how you put it. Are they fine? Sure. Will they get you where you’re going? Yep. But the efficiency of this car is nowhere near “excellent”.
@@philorgneopolotin8762 Of course it is. You seem to forget that this car is big and heavy, that it was cold and on huge winter tires with 21 inches / 265, of course, this has a significant impact on consumption.
That that is still so underestimated from many I do not understand. Even a truck can be very efficient, although it consumes a lot. Compare it with Bjorn's results in his linked table, there is no other car in his list that goes further in winter. Of course, this is also due to the large battery.
Still, a 2021 Tesla Model 3 LR (82 kWh), with 235/45-18 at 27 degrees manages 563km at 90km/h, in winter with the same tire sizes at 2degrees only 468.
If they repeat the test of the EQS in summer with 19", the difference will be huge. especially also with the EQS 450+ without AWD. The car is very efficient, other tests confirm that, Edmunds managed 422 miles in his test and even then it wasn't the best tires on it.
What do you expect from such a car? That it will use less energy than a car with much smaller tires and a ton less weight? Ever heard of physics?
Philorg... sorry, but how old are you? The Benz range is very impressive.
You have to chill down a bit if I may say so...
@@stennordenmalm1735He`s right tho!
cool
amazing nice review, very attractive movie Kudos
Hi Bjørn. Have you noticed this?
I got a model 3 performance 2019, done 80.000 km. When I use autopilot my average wh/km are higher, than when I'm not using it.
It seems like when you use the speeder pedel yourself, you are more efficient. Could you maybe test that on a electric car.
Tesla or not, I think it's the same outcome.
That's "common knowledge". Autopilot, Cruise Control, you name it, are not more efficient than an efficient driver. Think like this, every time the car brakes/regenerates it's losing efficiency. If you try to coast rather than regenerating you'll spend less overall energy.
When next live?
The basic consumption is a bit disappointing.
But I'm looking forward to further tests with the EQS 450+ and possibly in the summer, the EQS may shine particularly well there.
It is a winter test with freaking 21 inch snow tires. I think consumption is superb. In summer with similar wheels it should cover longer than a Model S.
@@agzand Do you even realize how inefficient this model is? Its worse then Etron 55, the most inefficient EV ever made... It has freakin SUV tires, thats how heavy it is... ridiculous...
@@DG-uv3zw Mercedes S class drivers do not buy the car for efficiency. And they certainly have the spondooly to pay Ionity high speed charging prices. The obsession with EV efficiency and range is irrelevant when average driver journeys (UK 10 miles) are so low. The issue that is being ignored is the opportunity for EV sharing when cars are parked for 90+% of the time on average. Imagine three or four owners sharing the costs of one car. In Copenhagen they have hundreds of i3’s and Zoe’s that are shared and club members pay only a subscription and for their usage. These practices are what is needed to save the planet but we are also obsessed with the one up a ship of ownership. We’ve all swallowed that consumer con.
@@ellistreloar2047 No, efficiency is "still" very important. There`s so many reasons... do more research or follow Bjorn`s channel. It becomes apparent when he`s traveling somewhere...
Ride sharing is really nice, but I personally would never do it... It`s just my personal preference. I want to have my own car... Covid?!?
@@DG-uv3zw When you assume you make an ass out of us both. I watch every Teslabjorn video, perhaps we agree that he is the most conscientious EV reviewer. I think you completely miss the point about S owners. Think about the price, think about who can afford to buy one of these, think about what their priorities are. Efficiency ain’t one, believe me.
This is the best EV so far made. Great technology in a phantastic car. Thanks for the Video Björn.
I consider it is hammering Tesla S at all :-)
No preconditioning on the way to a DC fast charger?
@@abraxastulammo9940 It does eat a lot of power.
Bjorn, you cannot hear 20 or 40Hz sounds in a car. The wave length of a tone of 30Hz is 9 meters. So only on a distance of 9 meters it is possible to hear when your ears are able to notice that frequency.
I'm not a sound engineer but from a layman's experience (and too many nights spent too close to nightclub speakers) I can guess that distance from the speaker has nothing to do with ability to hear bass notes. Sound waves are compression waves in air. It has more to do with the size and strength of the subwoofer.
So by your logic, listening to bass in headphones is impossible? ;)
Set the temp at 23 deg C ?. That's hot. I am always on 19 degC.
Hey Bjørn. Would you get a Model 3, Xpeng P7, Polestar 2 or Kia EV6 if you are looking for a car around 500k NOK?
he is a tesla boy, so model 3 i guess.
I would get the EV6. If you live in Norway, Model 3 might make more sense for you.
@@lucamarcspieletv Could you expand on why the Model 3 makes more sense for Norwegians? Charging opportunities?
@@KaptainCashew From what I've seen, the charing network for non-Teslas seems not that great in Norwegen. That might get better when Tesla opens up, but today, its not great.
Where I live, we have almost equal amounts of Tesla Chargers and non-tesla chargers, but alot more Teslas on the road.
In Norway there is no tax for EVs... Tesla costs almost as in US in Norway. That`s why it makes more sense. In other EU conutries you`re going to pay a lot for "imported" Tesla... Or wait for gigaBerlin model Y for instance...
Kia ev6 would be a second obvious choice. or ioniq 5 if you fancy different look but almost the same cars...
Where do you get your sample music from, Bjorn?
Artlist.io
Finally!!!
"I like this shit...totally useless.
As a nerd, I like it."
- BjØrn, 2021
that is a crazy heavy car! the heck!
Hello Bjorn, I don't know if you did it in the past, but can you introduce this test for every EV you review it - the test is about how much energy the battery will lose overnight or after 2 days of staying in the parking lot. For example if you have the battery charged to 80% in the evening , how much percentage you will find in the battery the next morning or after 2 or more days of the EV parked , in different temperature conditions. This is a good comparison with an ICE car, as no matter how many days you will park a car with 20 litters of gas in the tank you will find the same 20 litters after a day, a week or one month after the vehicle was parked in a parking lot at different temperature conditions! This will be a very important factor in choosing the next EV you want to buy! Thanks!
1.) Power loss in parking is neglieble.
2.) Gas actually evaporates too.
3.) i left a hyundai ioniq pre face lift outside in a parking lot for 3 weeks.
had 1% percent powerloss.
You need to define what you want to test, like alarm mode on or off, accessibility through your smartphone or not, from Tesla we know that all these things require power, some other manufacturers don't even offer those features. And ICE cars cannot offer those features as no standard 12V battery would be able to support this for more than a few hours. If this consumption is of major concern for you, better get a vehicle that doesn't have those features and also will not see updates that could introduce those features at a later point in time.
I agree that around 1kWh per day for Teslas seems a little bit high, and it should be possible to offer the same features with less consumption, but at the end we are talking about costs of around 100 bucks per year which compared to consumption while driving is not that significant ... assuming you drive a few thousand km per year.
Additionally it is also difficult to test as battery looses capacity when getting cold (e.g. over night) and because of the consumption is relatively low, you probably need to test for many more than just 2 days to get meaningful accuracy. And then you might want to know how much more power is needed when alarm is on compared to when it is off, with mobile access on/off and then you we are talking about repeating this several-days-test with different configuration which adds up to weeks of testing before you get results that really become useful and comparable among car makers.
@@stefanwagener Yes, that's why it is important to test this aspect too, in ICE car you can have alarm too, stationary heating/ventilating, maybe no sentry cameras but those can be added later by you, and from my experience there is no problem for 12V battery to keep up. I think it's a simple test, as anyway you have the car for 2 or more days, you let the basic function on - like for an ICE car - you verify the state of charge in the evening and again in the next morning or after 2 days and check the temperature outside the car, if you can have the same car in the summer too you repeat the test AND ADD A SPECIAL COLUMN IN THAT FAMOUS EXCEL OF BJORN, this way you don't have a surprise when you buy a new EV. For example Dacia Spring on 10 degrees C is losing 2% of SoC overnight which is totally unacceptable - even it's a cheap EV
@@trazyntheinfinite9895 1% SoC loss in 3 weeks is more than acceptable from my point of view! It was in the winter or in the summer?
What is cold gating?
the reason you get reflection on that screen is so that the driver pays attention to the road and not the screen
Nope. Reflection in the dashboard can also happen even if there's not a screen there.
Its clearly not for the driver. Its right in front of the passenger
I just went to the MB experience showroom in NY to see the EQS. Now first let me say that I love Mercedes and own an SL. But the EQS interior is the gaudiest thing I've ever seen. It looks like it was designed by the guy that made neon palm trees for the Skymall catalog. And why such a long hood but no front trunk? Walking across the street and sitting in a Tesla was a much needed palette cleanser. Dare I say, Tesla has become more German than the Germans these days.
Well said...
Tesla interior is bland, the eqs interior is far superior,
Tesla interior sucks. But if you like it more go ahead
@@Zerospawnn The exterior is even more so.
Ionity limited at 500A maybe the EQS could be charging faster on SuC v3 when the charging network is available to other brands. I hope someone can test this in NL
I will ask Mercedes!
But V3 is weaker than Ionity Tritium/Ionity?
@@bookie9273 Ionity is limited to 500A. Because EQS battery is 400v based the CCS2 connector is limitation factory with its 500A limit. Cars with 800v battery can get much faster speeds at Ionity because the Amps are not the limiting factory with such a high voltage for now. And no EQS can not get any more speed on V3 supercharger, because V3 standard is modified CCS and other matufacturers cars doesnt support Tesla:s modified CCS standard. Maximum speed for other cars theoretically on V3 Superchargers is something like 190-205kw.
@@bookie9273 The point is that mercedes has a 400V system and ionity and others are limited to 500A. 400Vx500A = 200kW max. To charge with more power you need a higher voltage. Tesla V3 provides more amps at 400V and so can charge 250kW, but I doubt the Mercedes would charge faster there, it is limited by the car.
@@bookie9273 Well not in amperage! In volts, yes.
I totally dislike the big EQS logo on the side of the vehicle….what’s that all about?…
What would heating expenses be for the Model S under the same conditions? I estimate 2 kW pr hour when driving at 90 in these low temps. That would be 22 Wh/km, so increasing Model S consumption at 19" to 166 Wh/km at 19" and 40 kg less weight. agree @Bjørn Nyland?
Nope... With heat pump could be less then 1 kW...
@@DG-uv3zw No way, wind chill effect in 90 km/h, or 25 m/s, would be around -10C. Camp mode standing still draws above 1 kW.
@@eirik500 but it uses leftover heat from battery or drivetrain. Also with octovalve it can scavage heat even from onboard computer etc...( no PTC heater in Tesla with octovalve!?!) Bjorn starts his tests after charging, so plenty of heat...
@@DG-uv3zw Can't really compare EQS to Model 3. Different size and class.
If we look at the Model S, what is the real camp mode consumption? Then add windchill.
@@eirik500 not sure if new model S has heat pump!?! 99% sure it does