I think her biggest regret is allowing MM to marry Harry and become a member of the Royal Family. She was human with flaws like all of us. I miss the Queen.
@@roseamberzine5846 Harry was advised to slow down his romance with Meghan and get to know her better. He wouldn't listen. In the Royal Family, you can date actresses but you can't marry them. That was what Prince Philip told Harry. Harry just turned his back on his family's advice. He would have done better with someone who is not a pathological narcissist liar like Meghan.
No, Princess Margaret could still marry Peter W. Townsend as well as keep her title & royal stipends along with the royal duties. Her elder sister, i.e. Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II & the Prime Minister R. Anthony Eden did agree to give their blessings - Eden was more sympathetic compared to his predecessor (Winston L. S. Churchill) as he was a divorcé himself like Townsend. In fact, the British Government proposed to top-up Princess Margaret’s (1952) Civil List yearly allowance of GBP6,000 significantly by an additional GBP9,000 per annum should the marriage with Townsend go ahead - he after all still had to pay child allowance to his ex-wife. Furthermore, the public by 1955 was generally supportive - people shouted cheers of encouragement when she passed by that she could “go on [&] do what you want!” However, Princess Margaret apparently felt the caveats to the proposed marriage, i.e. losing her place as well as those of any of her children if she had any in the line of succession & the civil wedding condition as the Church of England was not to be involved were not worth it. “I have been aware that, subject to my renouncing my rights of succession, it might have been possible for me to contract a civil marriage. But, mindful of the Church’s teaching that Christian marriage is indissoluble, and conscious of my duty to the Commonwealth, I have resolved to put these considerations before any others. I have reached this decision entirely alone, and in doing so I have been strengthened by the unfailing support and devotion of Group Captain Townsend.” - Monday, 31st October 1955 What happened in May 1978 was different, i.e. she would not sacrifice her love for the Crown this time & became the first royal to divorce since King Henry VIII.
I think that she was pressured into saying that by her family. I her heard her mother the queen mother was overbearing so it wouldn't surprise me if she had something to do about that behind the scenes
@@joannabaity8520 Granny should have kept her nose out of the whole affair. Even the Duke of Edinburgh was not fond of the Queen's mother, as she interfered in things that were nothing to do with her.
That marriage was doomed from day dot - not because of Camilla, but because they were two completely incompatible people and Diana was an hysteric with serious mental health issues.
Charles should have made a speech essentially saying. My family and I are in shock. Diana's family is grieving, this includes her sons, siblings, myself, and the Queen. We wish to grieve in private just as you wish to grieve in private when a beloved family member of yours dies. As Princess Diana is no longer a member of the royal family per se, only the Union Jack will be flown in tribute at half staff. In time, announcements will be made with regard to her memorial service. Then in private call Blair and tell him to buugar off.
@@tonyspain2 She was persuaded not to go because the rescue operation which was time critical, would have been halted. She did go when it was clear that the operation was a recovery not a rescue one
Andrew is long said to have been her favorite child. However, how is that gleaned? How do we know this, unless the Queen personally admitted it to someone.
The Queen couldn’t have prevented her grandson from marrying the old woman, although she had MM thoroughly investigated and knew all there was to know about M. Hairy was under the influence of something… idiocy maybe and thought he’d live a life of magical bliss ever after. He has very little education, just like M and no talents or skills, and in general hairy is a dud! He was born into the RF but no one is impressed with how he has misuses his position. He tried to put a squeeze on Princess Catherine, and she immediately authorized her secret service staff to keep him away from her, forever! M gave C a huge carving knife for Christmas, with no telling what undisclosed message. M is a kleptomaniac and has taken numerous valuable and historic items from the palaces to sell on eBay! Foiled by undercover agents. She is a very unscrupulous woman. Beware if you invite them over for dinner. Correct me if I’m wrong.
how ridiculous she considered the POV of philip and went along where is there any mistake there ? security at palace it was her life to lose and people like her and myself grew up in a time when we ALL LEFT THE DOORS UNLOCKED she lived through WWII and had no reason to assume the public would go insane this is just another awful video with content that is entirely insulting SOD OFF
The Queen was great but she should have overruled the family and approved the Charles/Camilla match. She also should have given her sister the green light to marry Peter Townstead.
No, Princess Margaret could still marry Peter W. Townsend as well as keep her title & royal stipends along with the royal duties. Her elder sister, i.e. Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II & the Prime Minister R. Anthony Eden did agree to give their blessings - Eden was more sympathetic compared to his predecessor (Winston L. S. Churchill) as he was a divorcé himself like Townsend. In fact, the British Government proposed to top-up Princess Margaret’s (1952) Civil List yearly allowance of GBP6,000 significantly by an additional GBP9,000 per annum should the marriage with Townsend go ahead - he after all still had to pay child allowance to his ex-wife. Furthermore, the public by 1955 was generally supportive - people shouted cheers of encouragement when she passed by that she could “go on [&] do what you want!” However, Princess Margaret apparently felt the caveats to the proposed marriage, i.e. losing her place as well as those of any of her children if she had any in the line of succession & the civil wedding condition as the Church of England was not to be involved were not worth it. “I have been aware that, subject to my renouncing my rights of succession, it might have been possible for me to contract a civil marriage. But, mindful of the Church’s teaching that Christian marriage is indissoluble, and conscious of my duty to the Commonwealth, I have resolved to put these considerations before any others. I have reached this decision entirely alone, and in doing so I have been strengthened by the unfailing support and devotion of Group Captain Townsend.” - Monday, 31st October 1955 What happened in May 1978 was different, i.e. she would not sacrifice her love for the Crown this time & became the first royal to divorce since King Henry VIII.
The Royal Family brings in a grest many tourists. If you no longer have thr tourists how are you going to make up the money they bring. The anti Royals never explain how they will replace the money. I have been waiting for an answer for years.
Maybe letting b Charles marry Camila. That would have been fine, but she should have passed the throne to William. It’s Camilla or throne, you ca t have boo. I think that was her only mistake. H/M but Wuenn was elderly, she probably fey King would deal with his son as she had to Andrew. But obviously he hasn’t. She would have been very angry at these unofficial visits to other countries. She would not have put up with that. She had a difficult dilemma with her sister , but at time she and parliament did the right thing. And Margaret still had a choice was not forced. Diana, was a difficult Mai because o don’t think Royals understood about mental illness back then line all of us. I think they just thought Diana an immature spoiled brat. When she did have serious issues. But long before she married into royal s. So royals can’t be fully to blame for that. Spencer’s knew Diana very well .
This isn't 1547. The Sovereign can't pass the crown to anybody he or she pleases; it goes to the next person in line of succession according to the relevant Acts of Parliament. No Government would have wanted to get involved in opening such a foul can of worms as to try to pass over Charles.
Preventing her young sister Margaret from marrying g the man she truly loved which made way for r her to inadversely marry a man who frequently cheated on her. Hadshemarried Townsend her life could have been so much better
My considered opinion is different. Margaret would have drifted away from Townsend as she did with every one of her relationships. As was said of her, she was a princess who wanted to be treated as an ordinary person until the moment someone did, and then she instantly reverted to being a princess. The reasons for quashing the proposed marriage may have been anachronistic and morally questionable, but I've never thought that Margaret would or could have everlasting love for anybody but herself.
No, Princess Margaret could still marry Peter W. Townsend as well as keep her title & royal stipends along with the royal duties. Her elder sister, i.e. Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II & the Prime Minister R. Anthony Eden did agree to give their blessings - Eden was more sympathetic compared to his predecessor (Winston L. S. Churchill) as he was a divorcé himself like Townsend. In fact, the British Government proposed to top-up Princess Margaret’s (1952) Civil List yearly allowance of GBP6,000 significantly by an additional GBP9,000 per annum should the marriage with Townsend go ahead - he after all still had to pay child allowance to his ex-wife. Furthermore, the public by 1955 was generally supportive - people shouted cheers of encouragement when she passed by that she could “go on [&] do what you want!” However, Princess Margaret apparently felt the caveats to the proposed marriage, i.e. losing her place as well as those of any of her children if she had any in the line of succession & the civil wedding condition as the Church of England was not to be involved were not worth it. “I have been aware that, subject to my renouncing my rights of succession, it might have been possible for me to contract a civil marriage. But, mindful of the Church’s teaching that Christian marriage is indissoluble, and conscious of my duty to the Commonwealth, I have resolved to put these considerations before any others. I have reached this decision entirely alone, and in doing so I have been strengthened by the unfailing support and devotion of Group Captain Townsend.” - Monday, 31st October 1955 What happened in May 1978 was different, i.e. she would not sacrifice her love for the Crown this time & became the first royal to divorce since King Henry VIII.
I would point out 75 years ago life was far more formal and the fact that HNQE2 what is distant what is the new different from any communication in various walks of life. It is quite naive to suggest that her Majesty would adopt a less formal mood when addressing her people. Also, why do authority broadcasters refer to The Times as the London Times. The times is national daily and available throughout the country, along with several other daily national papers. Cities, such as Liverpool, Manchester Glasgow have their regional publications, put the times the oldest, and most respected publication is regularly incorrectly referred to as being really, I London newspaper. It’s very definitely is not. !!
WE NO LONGER NEED A ROYAL FAMILY..THE COST IS FAR TOO GREAT FOR THE SMALL UK NOW IN CRISIS WITH MIGRANTS AND THE COST OF LIVING GOING THROUGH THE ROOF WHO NEED THIS EXTRA MEGA COST FOR PEOPLE WE DON'T KNOW AND THERE ARE FAR TOO MANY OF THEM PLUS HANGERS ON AND THE UPKEEP OF ROYAL HOMES NEVER LIVED IN!!. WHO PAYS? WE DO!!
If Britain became a republic, where would the head of state live? Unless you're proposing to sell off Buckingham Palace, Windsor Castle, etc., they're still going to have to be maintained at some public expense as museums or places for diplomatic functions. Westminster politicians have sucked down far, far more of the public money than all the royals combined.
The coldness could also be attributed to her upbringing... under the thumb of Alexandra Caroline Marie Charlotte Louise Julia of Denmark & Princess Victoria Mary of Teck... AKA The Queens Consort of Edward VII & George V respectively.
ALL THESE FOUR TOGETHER ARE NOT THIS BIG AND UNFORGIVABLE AS THE ONE YOU DIDN´T MENTION ! THE ONE IS ALSO THE BIGGEST FAILURE FOR THE COUNTRY AND MONARCHY !
The Queen of England has a lot of things that she is great for, her SON now a Father shall continue with what was bestowed, in righteousness, left and right, thousands of years, for it bears record of the book of life, and so as 14 generations, 24, 144,000 accounted, for Christopher and Alice, it shall continue, in all righteousness be it left and right. Protected and Preserved. KJV 1611. ∆ ∆ *****
Still miss the Queen. She stood for good things and always worked hard for her nation. No one will ever be able to take away what she stood for.
She was an Upstanding Queen to Britain and her Husband too was an Upstanding Duke of Edinburgh
@@susanpage502 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I think her biggest regret is allowing MM to marry Harry and become a member of the Royal Family. She was human with flaws like all of us. I miss the Queen.
Who was he supposed to marry? You? Harry loves Meghan so you and your kind never stood a chance. Get over it!
She couldn't have stopped them.
@@roseamberzine5846 Harry was advised to slow down his romance with Meghan and get to know her better. He wouldn't listen. In the Royal Family, you can date actresses but you can't marry them. That was what Prince Philip told Harry. Harry just turned his back on his family's advice. He would have done better with someone who is not a pathological narcissist liar like Meghan.
She stopped Charles from marrying Camilla, and pretty much forced him to marry Diana.
I'm an American and I think she was the greatest Queen ever put on the throne God bless your country with her
No. Elizabeth I was the best
Her biggest regret is not allowing Princess Margaret to marry Peter Townsend.
YES
No, Princess Margaret could still marry Peter W. Townsend as well as keep her title & royal stipends along with the royal duties.
Her elder sister, i.e. Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II & the Prime Minister R. Anthony Eden did agree to give their blessings - Eden was more sympathetic compared to his predecessor (Winston L. S. Churchill) as he was a divorcé himself like Townsend.
In fact, the British Government proposed to top-up Princess Margaret’s (1952) Civil List yearly allowance of GBP6,000 significantly by an additional GBP9,000 per annum should the marriage with Townsend go ahead - he after all still had to pay child allowance to his ex-wife.
Furthermore, the public by 1955 was generally supportive - people shouted cheers of encouragement when she passed by that she could “go on [&] do what you want!”
However, Princess Margaret apparently felt the caveats to the proposed marriage, i.e. losing her place as well as those of any of her children if she had any in the line of succession & the civil wedding condition as the Church of England was not to be involved were not worth it.
“I have been aware that, subject to my renouncing my rights of succession, it might have been possible for me to contract a civil marriage.
But, mindful of the Church’s teaching that Christian marriage is indissoluble, and conscious of my duty to the Commonwealth, I have resolved to put these considerations before any others.
I have reached this decision entirely alone, and in doing so I have been strengthened by the unfailing support and devotion of Group Captain Townsend.”
- Monday, 31st October 1955
What happened in May 1978 was different, i.e. she would not sacrifice her love for the Crown this time & became the first royal to divorce since King Henry VIII.
I think that she was pressured into saying that by her family. I her heard her mother the queen mother was overbearing so it wouldn't surprise me if she had something to do about that behind the scenes
Church of England
That she forced the marriage with Charles and Diana.
She didn't. Granny forced the clergy to advise EIIR that the marriage would not be right! Then bullied the Queen in to agreeing with them!
She should never have done that
@@joannabaity8520 Granny should have kept her nose out of the whole affair. Even the Duke of Edinburgh was not fond of the Queen's mother, as she interfered in things that were nothing to do with her.
@@Volcano-Man dont talk such nonsense. Noone forced Charles and Diana to the altar.
She didn’t do that. Prince Philip did. He said to Charles “marry that girl or let her go.” Or words to that effect.
HM Queen Elizabeth II had her faults like any mother ❤
Asking Charles and Diana to divorce rather than tell Charles to stop going with Camilla
ABSOLUTELY
Diana was screwing around too
That marriage was doomed from day dot - not because of Camilla, but because they were two completely incompatible people and Diana was an hysteric with serious mental health issues.
No the Diana marriage was doomed b/4 it started.
Charles should have made a speech essentially saying.
My family and I are in shock. Diana's family is grieving, this includes her sons, siblings, myself, and the Queen. We wish to grieve in private just as you wish to grieve in private when a beloved family member of yours dies. As Princess Diana is no longer a member of the royal family per se, only the Union Jack will be flown in tribute at half staff. In time, announcements will be made with regard to her memorial service.
Then in private call Blair and tell him to buugar off.
I bet one of the 4 regrets was her hesitation at going in person to the site of the 1966 coal avalanche in Wales.
Never forget that she said she had to fake tears, that was so hard to understand.
She did go!
@@tonyspain2 She was persuaded not to go because the rescue operation which was time critical, would have been halted. She did go when it was clear that the operation was a recovery not a rescue one
@@lynettesmith6971 what nonsense are you talking
@@lynettesmith6971 no- one would have had to 'fake tears' at that horrendous site.🖤🖤
That she spoiled Andrew, her favorite child!! Look what it did to him.
Andrew is long said to have been her favorite child. However, how is that gleaned? How do we know this, unless the Queen personally admitted it to someone.
A mother always leans more towards her weakest child
@@weskitten It was very obvious almost from the word go! Andrew got away with far more than his elder brother and sister ever could.
@@Volcano-Man Well, I'm Andrew. I was b. 1966, so perhaps I was named after him.
@@maryannekenny8874 Say what you like about Andrew, but look at his military career, he was far from being weak.
Not speaking to the people for a week after Princess Diana Died, she shouldn’t have waited.
She never thought she was ever going to end up being Queen and she was very young, she needed to figure out what to do
Allowing Charles' side chick into the family was her worst mistake.
Ridiculous computer generated voice, bad English, bad grammar and unchecked subtitles (included why?).
This is not computer-generated. It is MICHAEL CAINE.
I hate that. The Queen deserves better than AI.
Queen Elizabeth was a wonderful person...i miss her
Hi mum Elizabeth, you were a beautiful woman. Miss you. ❤
The late Queen Elizabeth ll was fortunate she had good advisors
She was so beautiful when she was young and old
Her biggest regret was holding on to old ideals, not being flexible enough to change with the times.
She actually was fairly flexible. She helped modernize the institution in many ways.
Aberfan
Her biggest regret was not retiring no matter what she promised all those years ago, she could not let go!!!
Prince William wasn't ready and her son Now king Charles incapable of strength dealing with Harry or Andrew.
Dreadful A.I. voiceover and factual inaccuracies. What a waste of time this is.
That she let MM marry Harry....
That she had Prince Andrew the pedophile prince
💯!! Mistake!!
@@s1nd3r3llee 100% Grifter's R US!!!
The Queen couldn’t have prevented her grandson from marrying the old woman, although she had MM thoroughly investigated and knew all there was to know about M. Hairy was under the influence of something… idiocy maybe and thought he’d live a life of magical bliss ever after. He has very little education, just like M and no talents or skills, and in general hairy is a dud! He was born into the RF but no one is impressed with how he has misuses his position. He tried to put a squeeze on Princess Catherine, and she immediately authorized her secret service staff to keep him away from her, forever! M gave C a huge carving knife for Christmas, with no telling what undisclosed message. M is a kleptomaniac and has taken numerous valuable and historic items from the palaces to sell on eBay! Foiled by undercover agents. She is a very unscrupulous woman. Beware if you invite them over for dinner. Correct me if I’m wrong.
Let? He was a grown man and after age 25 did not need her permission as is royal protocol.
They were and not are approachable or open. The late Queen had her dignity so had some respect but the new royals are worthless 😢
The narrative is appalling.
how ridiculous she considered the POV of philip and went along where is there any mistake there ? security at palace it was her life to lose and people like her and myself grew up in a time when we ALL LEFT THE DOORS UNLOCKED she lived through WWII and had no reason to assume the public would go insane this is just another awful video with content that is entirely insulting SOD OFF
I’ve frowned to love and respect the Queen ❤
That whole line of family 😳
Shocking notion. The Queen wasn't perfect, and she made mistakes. Who knew even the Queen was human.
The Queen was great but she should have overruled the family and approved the Charles/Camilla match.
She also should have given her sister the green light to marry Peter Townstead.
No, Princess Margaret could still marry Peter W. Townsend as well as keep her title & royal stipends along with the royal duties.
Her elder sister, i.e. Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II & the Prime Minister R. Anthony Eden did agree to give their blessings - Eden was more sympathetic compared to his predecessor (Winston L. S. Churchill) as he was a divorcé himself like Townsend.
In fact, the British Government proposed to top-up Princess Margaret’s (1952) Civil List yearly allowance of GBP6,000 significantly by an additional GBP9,000 per annum should the marriage with Townsend go ahead - he after all still had to pay child allowance to his ex-wife.
Furthermore, the public by 1955 was generally supportive - people shouted cheers of encouragement when she passed by that she could “go on [&] do what you want!”
However, Princess Margaret apparently felt the caveats to the proposed marriage, i.e. losing her place as well as those of any of her children if she had any in the line of succession & the civil wedding condition as the Church of England was not to be involved were not worth it.
“I have been aware that, subject to my renouncing my rights of succession, it might have been possible for me to contract a civil marriage.
But, mindful of the Church’s teaching that Christian marriage is indissoluble, and conscious of my duty to the Commonwealth, I have resolved to put these considerations before any others.
I have reached this decision entirely alone, and in doing so I have been strengthened by the unfailing support and devotion of Group Captain Townsend.”
- Monday, 31st October 1955
What happened in May 1978 was different, i.e. she would not sacrifice her love for the Crown this time & became the first royal to divorce since King Henry VIII.
Remember Queen Mary was a big influence.
I do not know where you get all this rubbish. The late Queen was popular from the beginning too the end of her reign
How exactly do you know all this did she tellyou
Rest in eternal peace you're highness Queen Elizabeth ii you are still missed 😢❤😢
The Royal Family brings in a grest many tourists. If you no longer have thr tourists how are you going to make up the money they bring. The anti Royals never explain how they will replace the money. I have been waiting for an answer for years.
1:06 Narration subtitle has wrong word and doesn’t give proper meaning! Her words had ‘weight’.
The voice over is dreadful, makes it hard to understand sounds like artificial intelligence
Because it is... It's a British Bot delivering words programmed by an American (hence all the mistakes)
I would not use the word intelligence here.
Her Majesty The Queen 👸 🙌 always ♥️ loved..adored and deeply ♥️ respected 🙏 🤲 we miss you beloved lady GOD BLESS 🙌 ♥️ 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🫡
Maybe letting b Charles marry Camila. That would have been fine, but she should have passed the throne to William. It’s Camilla or throne, you ca t have boo. I think that was her only mistake. H/M but Wuenn was elderly, she probably fey King would deal with his son as she had to Andrew. But obviously he hasn’t. She would have been very angry at these unofficial visits to other countries. She would not have put up with that. She had a difficult dilemma with her sister , but at time she and parliament did the right thing. And Margaret still had a choice was not forced. Diana, was a difficult Mai because o don’t think Royals understood about mental illness back then line all of us. I think they just thought Diana an immature spoiled brat. When she did have serious issues. But long before she married into royal s. So royals can’t be fully to blame for that. Spencer’s knew Diana very well .
Sorry for spell errors
What is "a difficult Mai " ?
Maybe a special "english expression" ?
Sorry for this, I'm a stupid german 🤣
That's not how monarchies work.
@@jorg8714You are not stupid. I don't know what "Mai" she means. Oh well . . . .
This isn't 1547. The Sovereign can't pass the crown to anybody he or she pleases; it goes to the next person in line of succession according to the relevant Acts of Parliament.
No Government would have wanted to get involved in opening such a foul can of worms as to try to pass over Charles.
Her mother was evil and cold
Preventing her young sister Margaret from marrying g the man she truly loved which made way for r her to inadversely marry a man who frequently cheated on her. Hadshemarried Townsend her life could have been so much better
My considered opinion is different. Margaret would have drifted away from Townsend as she did with every one of her relationships. As was said of her, she was a princess who wanted to be treated as an ordinary person until the moment someone did, and then she instantly reverted to being a princess.
The reasons for quashing the proposed marriage may have been anachronistic and morally questionable, but I've never thought that Margaret would or could have everlasting love for anybody but herself.
No, Princess Margaret could still marry Peter W. Townsend as well as keep her title & royal stipends along with the royal duties.
Her elder sister, i.e. Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II & the Prime Minister R. Anthony Eden did agree to give their blessings - Eden was more sympathetic compared to his predecessor (Winston L. S. Churchill) as he was a divorcé himself like Townsend.
In fact, the British Government proposed to top-up Princess Margaret’s (1952) Civil List yearly allowance of GBP6,000 significantly by an additional GBP9,000 per annum should the marriage with Townsend go ahead - he after all still had to pay child allowance to his ex-wife.
Furthermore, the public by 1955 was generally supportive - people shouted cheers of encouragement when she passed by that she could “go on [&] do what you want!”
However, Princess Margaret apparently felt the caveats to the proposed marriage, i.e. losing her place as well as those of any of her children if she had any in the line of succession & the civil wedding condition as the Church of England was not to be involved were not worth it.
“I have been aware that, subject to my renouncing my rights of succession, it might have been possible for me to contract a civil marriage.
But, mindful of the Church’s teaching that Christian marriage is indissoluble, and conscious of my duty to the Commonwealth, I have resolved to put these considerations before any others.
I have reached this decision entirely alone, and in doing so I have been strengthened by the unfailing support and devotion of Group Captain Townsend.”
- Monday, 31st October 1955
What happened in May 1978 was different, i.e. she would not sacrifice her love for the Crown this time & became the first royal to divorce since King Henry VIII.
I would point out 75 years ago life was far more formal and the fact that HNQE2 what is distant what is the new different from any communication in various walks of life. It is quite naive to suggest that her Majesty would adopt a less formal mood when addressing her people.
Also, why do authority broadcasters refer to The Times as the London Times. The times is national daily and available throughout the country, along with several other daily national papers.
Cities, such as Liverpool, Manchester Glasgow have their regional publications, put the times the oldest, and most respected publication is regularly incorrectly referred to as being really, I London newspaper. It’s very definitely is not. !!
Thats your son the king and future king
WE NO LONGER NEED A ROYAL FAMILY..THE COST IS FAR TOO GREAT FOR THE SMALL UK NOW IN CRISIS WITH MIGRANTS AND THE COST OF LIVING GOING THROUGH THE ROOF WHO NEED THIS EXTRA MEGA COST FOR PEOPLE WE DON'T KNOW AND THERE ARE FAR TOO MANY OF THEM PLUS HANGERS ON AND THE UPKEEP OF ROYAL HOMES NEVER LIVED IN!!. WHO PAYS? WE DO!!
99% of British will die for monarchy; that's how popular are the royals. Even if local British scrounge for everyday life, they love their royals.
£3.98 each person is not very much.
The migrants /homeless can put up tents on the ground of palaces of the Royals
If Britain became a republic, where would the head of state live?
Unless you're proposing to sell off Buckingham Palace, Windsor Castle, etc., they're still going to have to be maintained at some public expense as museums or places for diplomatic functions.
Westminster politicians have sucked down far, far more of the public money than all the royals combined.
Giving birth. That’s the 4.
I heard people like the princess royal though
The film is on RUclips
Her biggest regret should be in being complicit in diannas passing.
She couldn't interfer with that as he was only a grandson and anyway they appear happy
I thought Aberfan was her biggest regret???
Raising her own kids and grandkids? King David Windsor Xii
Hiluscinating and dying
Pretty sure the narrator can't ascribe to the saying "We are all human"😐
for marring cheating phily
That she fell soo deep, that a MISTRESS of his son is now the queen 😉
No. She knew that Camilla was the only Charles' s love.
You mean his current wife.
@@weskitten Of course.
Queen Camilla has been a good wife to Charles, a good queen, and great support for Charles.
...a DEVOTED WIFE of her son is now Queen. There, fixed it for ya.
The coldness could also be attributed to her upbringing... under the thumb of Alexandra Caroline Marie Charlotte Louise Julia of Denmark & Princess Victoria Mary of Teck... AKA The Queens Consort of Edward VII & George V respectively.
Queen Alexandra died before Elizabeth was born.
ALL THESE FOUR TOGETHER ARE NOT THIS BIG AND UNFORGIVABLE AS THE ONE YOU DIDN´T MENTION ! THE ONE IS ALSO THE BIGGEST FAILURE FOR THE COUNTRY AND MONARCHY !
Mum Elizabeth, hope you're well in heaven. Am OK. Which Baby of mine are you unhappy with mum. Please. Bedtime for me now. Goodnight ❤
Is this being narrated by Micheal Cane!? Queen Elizabeth was always : country and family first! So many years, to soon gone!💔
Can't admire or be interested in anyone who did ... .a thing for fellow men/ women?
Who told you this? The Queen??? 🥸🙉🥸🙉
That she spoiled Charles her son.
That she most certainly did not do!
@@Volcano-ManOH YES SHE 😮😮
DID 😅😅
@adeze7992 and @cb4883. In what way??
No she wouldn't even give Charles a hug. How cold and unfeeling. our King was never spoilt.
Harry's choice of marriage couldn't have been one of them.
How.dae they ken all this ea
Is this speaker AI or real? Either way, why the many ear-hurting mispronounced words? Totally unprofessional.
Only FOUR ?
That TV show "let daylight in upon mGic
she is crazy love to his spoiled brat son Charles abuse to much he dont regret others feeling possesivi hatehim
These AI voice-overs kill me. I suppose this one is some sort of bastardized Michael Caine. lol
King George vee!
Horrible voice over
Harry was determined to marry Meghan so all of the haters in the comments need to just get over it because Harry was man enough to follow his heart.
🤣🤣
Aberfan disaster
The Queen of England has a lot of things that she is great for, her SON now a Father shall continue with what was bestowed, in righteousness, left and right, thousands of years, for it bears record of the book of life, and so as 14 generations, 24, 144,000 accounted, for Christopher and Alice, it shall continue, in all righteousness be it left and right. Protected and Preserved. KJV 1611. ∆ ∆ *****
She could/should have blocked brexit. Greatest mistake. 😢😢😢
She should have blocked going into the Common Market. *That* was her biggest mistake.
The biggest mistake is not married too a BLACK CARRIBEAN MAN.❤
She was a narcissist that's why
She was definitely not, crawl back under your stone.
Now Now each to their own l respect your choice , now be a intelligent person if you can and respect other people’s views