Jamie Miller I sexually identify as an attack helicopter, why isn't my gender being represented in BfV? Where's my player freedom? And you can't use there being no helicopters in WW2 as an excuse as neither was there woman with prosthetic arms fighting on the front lines; I feel very discriminated against...
I hate 24/7 locker servers does no one play any other map other golmud/shanghai/locker? Im so sick of it, locker is such a cluster fuck explosive map with literally only one flanking route. Bf4 has turned to garbage because 3 map rotation. Just my 2 cents. Cant wait to play bfv too
Slick Jester why does it matter what you call it? It means dice are listening to the players. Damage control is a good thing. I'll never understand those people lol
They've done modern like 4 games in a row until they went to WW1. I'm all for them doing different eras to keep things fresh. Perhaps next time they will do modern again.
As a long time dice fan, I can't believe COD BO4 has actually got me hooked. I'm growing less interested in BFV.. I look around for some glimmer of hope concerning this game, but shockingly, it is a let down.
Imo the tweaking to gunplay will make BFV a much more enjoyable game for people who like consistency. The guns patterns can be learned individually (like said as in CSGO) and this makes for a more fun time playing. Things like realistic damage and penetration (the wall banging in CoD shouldn't be acceptable in a 2018 game) and world destruction will make the BF series always more fun and "serious" than CoD.
@@TheMaxilegs yea bec that's all bf does better than cod is having destruction bullet drop big ass maps and having vehicles that's all bf fan boys can say about bf i don't see what's so good about bf but that's just me
@rabeh el houjeiri 1. You don't get the joke captain obvious 2. You misspelled "still" and misspelled is one word 3. Damn I'm a internet teacher, pitiful...
Everyone's saying it's a messy game. I would rather say it WAS a messy game, because it feels like they are getting back on track. I truly believe the potential for this game is insane. I'm gonna put the past behind, and just enjoy the game
People seriously can’t take being killed by indirect fire? It frustrates them? Maybe it’s just me but I recognize a death in battlefield as something that’s part of the game. Period. In massive 64 player matches with huge open maps and objectives, kills and deaths don’t count or win the game the same way points an objectives do. Death is part of the back and forth tide that results in the capturing of objectives and acquiring of points. Battlefield isn’t a game you play for K/D ratio and team deathmatch game modes.
Some of my best times in bf3 was running for life from mortar fire or suppressing the enemy down with lmgs in the tunnels of metro only to be taken out by that one sniper. Seems like those rolls dont exsist in the newer games.
@@AlleStelle1018 to make this funny comment lol. Or maybe to trigger you. He has the freedom to be here, and you have the freedom to disagree. Just chill lol
Andrew Sork Nope, not if he’s here to hate. Nobody wants him here. Believe it or not, some people actually want to stay updated with this game because they pre-ordered it.
deadpooled 1018 I actually do still in fact have every right to come here and offend you and believe it or not im not affecting any of the people that watch the video to stay updated just the idiots going out of their way to get offended
Regardless of how BFV turns out, the developers took the time to reach out and listen to the community. Idk that an effort has been made like this before to do such a thing. People will always find something to complain about.
@@staryoshi06 If you think people aren't worried about the direction of battlefield after the launch trailers biblical failure then you're a hopeful fool.
im glad this game got the backlash in a way, the alpha of the game was pretty shit and so was customization but thanks to everyone complaining the current state (post beta) is really good it seems like they are redoing the game in some aspects, after this recent update about the things they changed i think i will pick it up it actually feels and looks like a classic battlefield game BF3 and before not like BF4, BFH and BF1, i also saw people complaining about the lack of weapons in BFV, i dont understand this, in BF4 we had so many weapons that were just shit and never used there was like one or two weapons per class that got used, with a smaller amount of weapons it means each weapon should feel much different and with different play styles, a small amount of solid unique weapons are better than like 80 crap copy and paste weapons
Yeah, a lot of the weapons in BF4 were similar and boring. But I'd much rather have that kind of freedom of choice that we had in BF4 rather than this crap.
Rondel Frederick over 50 different countries participated in ww2, how can you say there " weren't a ton of weapons". Dice has so much to draw from in terms of guns, but they won't because battlefield 5 was a lazy cash grab meant to one up call of duty ww2 from the beginning.
While everyone's still throwing a fit over the marketing, this game starts to look better and better every week. Loving the attention to detail and removal of some of the explosive spam. I legitimately have no complains over the weapons, which is a new one. New upgrade system seems similar to BF3/4 attachments. This seems like it's going to be a slower BF4 experience.
Basically every complaint I've seen from the beta has been fixed. It was a beta after all, Battlefield 1 was the same way --- remember those LMGs and snipers? Stay salty I guess lol, I'm going to be having fun.
@@thecosmicundead6894 LOL why? This game has no depth what so ever you don't need any skill for any weapon or vehicle. I can drive my plane up to a 100+ killstreak in nearly every 2nd round without even really trying it.
i dont understand the netcode troubles. 5th game and they keep fucking that up. are they really changing their game engine that much game to game to warrant so many fixes or is it just broken to begin with?
@Keelan there is no game engine as capable as frostbite and that plastic look you are talking about is caused by your graphics settings being set to very low because your pc is a piece of shit.
@@DestinAU I have a GTX 1080 as well and always played above 100% in every BF that allowed me to. I never had any issue. In fact, BFV ran even better than BF1 for me. You know that 200% means you're playing in 200% your current resolution right? *Note: 100% is often blurry on Frostbite engine, it depends of your monitor as I noticed... (best example would be NFS imo)
I hope that it isn't easy to shoot down a V1. It takes a while for a squad to call one in and I don't want one guy in a plane to shoot it down. That sucks. The way to counter a V1 is to RUN AWAY. ITS NOT THAT HARD. It takes forever to reach it's destination anyways
I'd like to see it so if you do spot one and you start putting enough shots on to it, it doesn't destroy it completely but essentially pushes it way off course and it lands in a random area, with the ability to kill friends or foes.
Let me debunk some arguments defending the game. 1: "Lol I cant believe you cant get over what one man said" Can you really expect there to be no backlash when a community voices its displeasure and the company refuses, insults the community, and gives a horrible excuse regarding a girl's ignorance? Also, do you really think that's the only reason people aren't buying the game? 2: "It's a game, it doesn't have to be realistic" Well, realism matters a substantial amount when it comes to history. And if you're not going to be realistic, at the very least call it an alternate universe or something. Also, we were promised immersion and realism, and we didn't receive that. Not to mention that when there was feedback about it, we were treated badly. 3: "The people who think that the game will flop are idiots" No, the people who think the game will flop are people who look at the situation at hand and know that because of the controversy and marketing that this will not be a game that sells well compared to other titles in the franchise. The hype just isn't high enough. Anyways, I'm free to debate with people. Reply and we can talk.
The "Just a one man"-argument is obviously used by young kids who don't know what they are talking about. The guy was a fucking chief design officer, not just one random guy off the street.
So many changes, this game will be great loving the improvements, people that are saying this game will fail are those BF4 fanboys who play 24/7 on Metro all day, more of a skill gap in BFV also. Can’t wait
For me, the removal of ridiculous cosmetics etc does not make the game much more immersive. I don't want an overly realistic game, but at least a convincing depiction of WW2 combat. I wish BF games would have era-based and team-based loadouts. Unscoped bolt-action rifles were the standard for European infantry, and thus should be the most common weapons on the battlefield. Pointman/"Assault" classes should have SMGs/shotguns. Snipers should have scoped rifles. There shouldn't be any holographic sights at all...
Battlefield has never been about realism though, sure we always want a certain degree of it, but you can go too far with realism and it stops being fun. Making sure the game is enjoyable and fun to play should be the priority, it isn't really supposed to be a simulation like the Arma games.
Where we draw the line at being too realistic though is entirely subjective. I'm with you on the holo sights thing btw, but the V1 rockets are awesome, when you see one flying above you and it comes crashing down destroying a large area of the battlefield, it really is a game changer and an epic moment that actually causes tension and fear.
Something I'd like to see is maybe the ability to crawl underneath vehicles that have high enough suspension. Although, players could shoot enough tires of said vehicle to crush anyone underneath too.
I'm interested to find out how shotguns will be balanced to this new system, its harder to balance shotguns as we've seen in the past as a shotgun player I'm interested to see their ideas
indirect fire in 1942? You mean... firing main gun at the sky with sherman on an extra large and not destructible empty map where you had 0.001% chance of killing someone by shooting randomly?
I’m still buying it, the feel of the game is outstanding completely unique and beautifully polished graphics as well as gameplay. Years of hard work from experienced developers. All of you expect way too much just sit down and enjoy the game!
I like the idea of dynamically seeing mortarmen and artillary men, it feels authentic and real. But getting killed by them doesn't exactly feel great. I would like to see them strike some balance for Mortars. Maybe you need a spotter or something?
One thing they didn't address is the V1 rocket spam. Squads all seem to build up V1's around the same time, so near the end of the map it just becomes rocket spam everywhere.
It’s hard to say you won’t have a “god gun” in game. Because if we’re basing these of off (for the most part) realistic performance, then unfortunately some guns can and will out preform most in all categories. It’s just kinda hard to get away from. You have to do some real in house tweaking to get weapons on a “equal” playing field. Otherwise we need to learn that there will be some guns that are best in class for all situations
bfv is just exhausting ... the game isnt even out yet and im already tired of trying to keep up with all the BS and controversy that is just attached at the hip with this poor game :/
Only a little detail which can improve visual organization: In the progreesion tab, they could show us a menu including the names of the classes, and after the class is chosen, the corresponding weapons and their level stats would show up... I just think it's a little bit messy when you want to find one weapon's progress, and you need to search and scroll the whole list of weapons and vehicles... Even though, congrats Dice for hearing us and making these improvements
I'm actually really happy to hear about what DICE is planning for gunplay. By far my biggest issue with BF1 was how inflexible the weapons felt and how it often felt like battles were won in the customization screen and not on the actual battlefield, and I was afraid that was going to persist into BFV.
@Apocalypse YT They'll either nerf it into the ground or leave it literally untouched. There is no middle ground with DICE. They think that having challenging weapons with strenghts and weaknesses would confuse their players.
All good stuff but I don't think you should spawn with a med pouch. That really harms the medic's ability to farm resupply and removes dependence on teammates and map knowledge that should just.. be there.
The skill to avoid mortar fire is to not get spotted and not sit in one place for very long bunched together with teammates. “Keeping your spacing” is a skill that a lot of people don’t care for because battlefield games are all about run and gun “sprint towards the flag no matter what” gameplay where you can just respawn on your friend who’s 2 feet away from the cap zone. They just need to make it so you have to “dial in” some coordinates without a minimap and make it so you can’t follow your shots with a chase camera. Or forget the whole indirect thing and save it for a team leader who can call it in on some kind of a timer, through squad leader markers. “Need artillery here” “need mortars here” “need supply drop here” etc.
I think they should have morders right away, this is supposed to be war. That's what happens in war you get bombed and have to run for cover hope to hell you don't get killed. They just cater to the babies that play these games and it's sad.
Tell your friends comparing cod and Battlefield is like comparing Minecraft to Roblox. They look similar and share some mechanics , but play completely different.
Still no M1 Garand or SVT-40? Grease gun? M1 Carbine? No Springfield? No Browning MG? What about the Mosin Nagant? These are very key weapons of WW2 and they aren’t in the game... Shameful.
oh look, a kid who knows the names of all the weapons in CoD: World At War XD, youve seen any beta gameplay? carbine is there, garand is there, fuck me, ppsh is there as well as mp40 and thompson, we cant know all the weapons based on beta gameplays but i am sure all those will be in there!!
I never understood why people didn’t like mortars. They were awesome in bf1. A great way to counter camping vehicles, and they made combat intense with artillery exploding overhead. It could really help teams advance in the right hands. And it isn’t hard to run away from the mortar’s fire and find the support player firing it.
They haven't completely fixed vehicle physics until parked cars/trolleys actually get PUSHED around by tanks, trucks, and other heavy vehicles (rather than being superglued to the ground). Visceral actually fixed this problem in BF Hardline. Unfortunately DICE still hasn't figured out how to implement this, and I'm not feeling very confident that it will be fixed in BFV either.
Well, you can't really expect people to be calm when they're lied to about "immersion" and "realism." And when they voice their complaints, the company refuses to listen and insults them in the process.
That's their choice, and I think people should accept that. Yes, I also want them to make the game more realistic and stuff, but do you know what? It doesn't really matter that much.
Don't know about you but I can't help but be a shitter with all these kids whining about like they own you, dissing something you worked your ass off to create. There is a way to complaint as well and getting things resolved takes patience.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, BF3 and BF4 were graphically fantastic and had brilliant weapon variety, however, when it came to teamwork, they still had very little on BF1942, BF2 or BF2142. Mortar was infinitely worse than Commander artillery - an ability that was on a CD and one could avoid after having memorized the timers. I like that BFV is adopting some of the elements that made older BF's so robust. That said, I still believe that SL only spawn is a must; having the ability to spawn on anyone only fractures a squad and just propagates the Rambo approach.
I think the fix the mortars would be treating him like heavy machine guns. They are stuck in one spot of the map which will allow team to know exactly where they're firing from and to take over the mortar position
The assualt class is odd since they got the long range weapons when they should have cqc weapons since they are you go to guys for blowing shit up and clearing house. I like the moving artelliary, some map layouts in BFV, no suppressive fire, low ammo, etc. but beyond that it essentially a more fixed progression of battlefield compared to previous battlefield games which had destruction and freedom to design your own arsenal which is absent in BFV. Even BF1 had more freedom since they had different versions of the same gun to choose from without back tracking. So yeah, maybe I'll get this game, just to mess around with but not for $60.
Dice might work on the weapon aspects but even you got admit that some perks are just odd, why do you need faster bullets? Either way it is a rough game to buy.
Very few people will realistically be able to give you an answer. Most of them are just farming for upvotes by commenting some stupid unoriginal joke that has on every BFV video 100x over. They had a messy first few weeks via terrible marketing and releasing one of the worst trailers of all time as their official first trailer for the game. However, since that initial debacle it has been nothing but positives IMO. It is not perfect, but they are listening and working on it, you can tell they really want to get this right.
😂😂😂 the comments are hysterical! This game will be amazing as it was in the beta with only 10% enabled on a small 11gb download. The things we saw weren't implemented for a reason, dice confirmed it. But, the things they say that they are adding we're already there just not the way they wanted it for the size of the download. Most of these haters are cod fan boys who don't know what Battlefield is. BFV is a huge upgrade from it's predecessors.. every thing is scaling in a huge positive way. *Edit* funny part is 99% of you watch BFV videos because it's peaked your interested to a great degree, but 70% of that 99% feel compelled to just say absolute trash about this game excercising your right to do so..
How HYSTERICALLY FUNNY is it that ironsights have been in Battlefield games since 2005 with Battlefield 2 (not counting sniper scopes who where in from the start). And it's now 2018 and they're actually going to represent where your bullets will go. Just absolutely HYSTERICAL!
Woman is for cosmetics . Mortars aren't in because they're trying to reduce explosive spam. These features in the game have genuine explanations. *THINK* before you *SPEAK.*
Honestly, I find "patterned" recoil to be an absolutely abhorrent game mechanic. If possible, weapon recoil from sprayed gunfire should be randomized to a limited extent. That way, good players will learn to burst fire efficiently rather than relying on learning the bizarre concept of preprogrammed recoil patterns.
from a pure gameplay perspective this just looks great but I am really worried about the campain with that disabled woman and I really hope that there are no woman solider exept maybe in the sovjet army if therý are ven in the main game I just hope it doesn't turn into a SJ Cringefest
Wha wha what what, soo dice treated there fans like shit, told them not to buy it if u dont like it, then dice sees the presales and now all of a suden they are trying to make the pple that makes them rich happy, huh, weird times we live it
I remember reading somewhere that a game should not be unnecessarily difficult as it turns to be aggravating which takes away the enjoyment. Switch on a console/PC play and enjoy, miss that you miss everything.
I’m glad dice is actually willing to change the core mechanics of the game. A thing most developers would keep away from at all costs. They know they messed up, and they did, but that doesn’t mean they aren’t going to try and fix it. They had an idea and thought the community would like it, it addressed several major issues which have plagued battlefield for a long time (grenade spam, one man army soldiers, 80 kill streak planes and tanks) And people didn’t like it, so they are going back on it to an extent. I applaud them
Dizcrowell me too man, I love the direction they’re going with this one! I hope they stick with the more squad based, hardcore direction for future battlefields.
give them time. Don't be rude. The woman's disability in the first trailer made them think about their own so they are recovering from depression. They will buy it anyway.
Is it just me or is BFV just a BF1 reskin with some building mechanics added in and different guns? I mean I'm glad the developers hear the community and try to adjust accordingly, but my main gripe with BF1 was how boring it got, sure in BFV you can upgrade weapons more and there's more customization overall for the player, but I just dont see this game lasting very long. I think Battlefield/Dice needs to realize they have a very large portion of people that want only modern shooter based BF games, and I would have to agree with them with the exception of Battlefield Vietnam. IMO BF3 and BF4 have infinitely more replayability than BF1 did and that BFV will have
@@antoniskazou I see what you're saying, but there isn't enough difference between BF1 and BFV for me to want to purchase BFV. I bought BF3 cause it had enough new features that BFBC2 didnt have and the same for BF3 going onto BF4. But I guess everyone gauges things differently and all things in life really end up boiling down to opinion
@@lexm0 in BF3 we could finally go prone. That was some game changing stuff right there. I can finally use a crater for cover. I agree that BF3 offered a lot of things that wasn't there in BFBC2, as for BF4 it feels different to BF3.
A larger part of the community likes diversity in the time period that game is set, modern shooters get boring after awhile as would any setting if done repeatedly over and over again.
Why don't they allow us to pick a calibre, then based on that calibre you'll get your DPS - it would throw out the authenticity, but give people more customization options when it comes to using guns.
Thank you Jack for bringing us another great video full of good information!!! I hope they remove auto aim completely on console, as this was the most frustrating thing of the beta. Many times I would aim and shot at a player, and a second player would come close to my initial target, having my aim pulled from the first target to the second because of the auto aim! It happened quick of course, but this almost always resulted in my death. It was very frustrating, and happened a lot.
I wish they do it like the BF4 attachment system again - attachment improves some stats of the gun but have drawbacks, with no "paths" to follow. Examples in BF4: Heavy barrel = More accuracy and recoil; Compensator = Less recoil and more spread. I think this brings more variety to the gun upgrades, and forces players to think up and experiment with setups to fit their guns and play style.
the gas operating system, barrel, mussel, and trigger system all influence automatic reloading weapons fire rate. changing any of these items in a weapon and positively or negatively affect the weapons fire rate. Historically the MG42 put out 1,200 Rounds per Minute, there is no easily searched info that indicates that there were variants that indicate a faster or slower RPM. With the exception of the predecessor being the MG34. Considering that I actively consider this game franchise as Science Fiction I don't particularly care that they are allowing for upgraded RPMs since it is plausible.
@@dipanjanbiswas4924 I suppose it is, but it is also the opinion of the popular opinion on Battlefield, the "dumbing down" of battlefield is considered to be real
But what if my daughter wanted to use a mortar? How would I explain to her that it cant be in the game?
There is a difference between game balance and player freedom
Jamie Miller I sexually identify as an attack helicopter, why isn't my gender being represented in BfV? Where's my player freedom? And you can't use there being no helicopters in WW2 as an excuse as neither was there woman with prosthetic arms fighting on the front lines; I feel very discriminated against...
Jamie Miller r/woooooosh
Your daughter isnt allowed to play if she aint mature enough wack ass dad
Thejeanio It isn't really a woosh because even though it was a joke, he still meant to be making fun of women being in the game
Still playing BF4 locker with 3200 tickets 😅
Veikka Rahkonen Because it‘s awesome 👍🏼
@SirCreepsAlott I actually hated that one
Me
I hate 24/7 locker servers does no one play any other map other golmud/shanghai/locker? Im so sick of it, locker is such a cluster fuck explosive map with literally only one flanking route. Bf4 has turned to garbage because 3 map rotation. Just my 2 cents. Cant wait to play bfv too
Same on the thc xbox servers
Now this is how you handle a beta, you actually listen and improve, not some cheap way to market your game
Clueless twerps - “DaMaGe CoNtRoL.”
*a MILLIONARIE BUSINESS, THINK !*
Slick Jester why does it matter what you call it? It means dice are listening to the players. Damage control is a good thing. I'll never understand those people lol
Lord Walder Frey
Exactly!
This is how you make people forget you called them retards and sexist bigots.
I might be in the minority here but I'd rather have a modern Battlefield game.
They've done modern like 4 games in a row until they went to WW1. I'm all for them doing different eras to keep things fresh. Perhaps next time they will do modern again.
Buy BF3 or BF4 then....
I think Cold War would be cool. Vietnam, Afghanistan, Angola and Mozambique. Korea, maybe.
@Mak or just ditch Battlefield altogether and go for WW3...
Big Slurp honeslty, that’s the most entertaining and interesting era.
As a long time dice fan, I can't believe COD BO4 has actually got me hooked. I'm growing less interested in BFV.. I look around for some glimmer of hope concerning this game, but shockingly, it is a let down.
Same i Love BO4!
Imo the tweaking to gunplay will make BFV a much more enjoyable game for people who like consistency. The guns patterns can be learned individually (like said as in CSGO) and this makes for a more fun time playing. Things like realistic damage and penetration (the wall banging in CoD shouldn't be acceptable in a 2018 game) and world destruction will make the BF series always more fun and "serious" than CoD.
What are you talking about? This bf v looks amazing
ok
@@TheMaxilegs yea bec that's all bf does better than cod is having destruction bullet drop big ass maps and having vehicles that's all bf fan boys can say about bf i don't see what's so good about bf but that's just me
"Indirect low skill explosives"
*Drops a V2 on an objective*
*Watches the killcount go up*
With everything going on around an objective, and considering the speed of a V2, you will NEVER be able to shoot one down.
@@Keln02 Perhaps daring pilots will sacrifice their lives by ramming into them before reaching their destination.
What?Theyre easy to dodge.I maybe got killed 5 times in total while fighting for B flag on Rotterdam where everyone would launch the V2 rocket at
idk it's quite tough to get the V2 though
@@FriedrichBarb right?only a coordinated squad will get it not just some random joes
Cant believe they fix vehicle phisics! It was broken since bf3.
Don’t you mean “vehicle fissicks”?
Crevetta what's a "Hardline" I've never heard of it
Little Beanze oof
@rabeh el houjeiri
1. You don't get the joke captain obvious
2. You misspelled "still" and misspelled is one word
3. Damn I'm a internet teacher, pitiful...
@@carlocolucci7482 *an
I love how if you overheat the mg42, you have to change the barrel out, very realistic
Jan Sim yeah, or just have the time to overheat reduced, and then have a longer animation of changing the barrel if you do overheat
Or have 2 spare barrels that you can use if needed.
Or u change the barrel and wait for the first to cool down and then Put it back when the second one overheats
@@jansim9171 how about restorable barrels in ammo stations?
Realistic? He is firing that thing from the shoulder, which is a task next to impossible! Also changing barrel holding the mg in one hand...
Everyone's saying it's a messy game. I would rather say it WAS a messy game, because it feels like they are getting back on track. I truly believe the potential for this game is insane.
I'm gonna put the past behind, and just enjoy the game
TheWalkingSteakhouse no
The only problem is that it doesn’t fully feel like WW2
Killer Champion I meant the multiplayer
Killer Champion what did jay manners say?
Forgetting the past allows it to happen again in the future.
People seriously can’t take being killed by indirect fire? It frustrates them?
Maybe it’s just me but I recognize a death in battlefield as something that’s part of the game. Period. In massive 64 player matches with huge open maps and objectives, kills and deaths don’t count or win the game the same way points an objectives do. Death is part of the back and forth tide that results in the capturing of objectives and acquiring of points. Battlefield isn’t a game you play for K/D ratio and team deathmatch game modes.
Some of my best times in bf3 was running for life from mortar fire or suppressing the enemy down with lmgs in the tunnels of metro only to be taken out by that one sniper. Seems like those rolls dont exsist in the newer games.
I can't wait to not get this game
THICC raw sauce Cool, why are you here then?
@@AlleStelle1018 to make this funny comment lol. Or maybe to trigger you. He has the freedom to be here, and you have the freedom to disagree. Just chill lol
Andrew Sork Nope, not if he’s here to hate. Nobody wants him here. Believe it or not, some people actually want to stay updated with this game because they pre-ordered it.
deadpooled 1018 I actually do still in fact have every right to come here and offend you and believe it or not im not affecting any of the people that watch the video to stay updated just the idiots going out of their way to get offended
THICC raw sauce Yeah, no ones getting offended buddy. Just you because there’s women in a WW2 game. How about you judge the game on gameplay instead?
I love being called an uneducated sexist.
Greg B you are a uneducated sexist
Fuck are you here for then?
doubt
Kill the feminazis
I know you got triggered when he said that, but he's left the company. Let's move on to the next social justice video game outrage.
Why are there no pink haired, transgender, fox kin, gender binary strippers in the game? Such discrimination is unacceptable in the current year 2018.
stfu your such a baby
He is joking smart one
It's been like 58 months now and people are still recycling the same shit jokes.
Honestly. The discrimination is abhorrent
r/woooosh
Sorry Jack, I lost concentration when I saw Nathalie's legs...
ikr i'm drooling
Who even is she lol
me too mann hahaha
who is she ?
NapalmPig lool😂
Regardless of how BFV turns out, the developers took the time to reach out and listen to the community. Idk that an effort has been made like this before to do such a thing. People will always find something to complain about.
They're in panic mode. It's disingenuous
+Scarred Praetorian
Not really. There are actually a lot of people who like the game. They aren't panicked about anything.
@@staryoshi06 If you think people aren't worried about the direction of battlefield after the launch trailers biblical failure then you're a hopeful fool.
I do definitely think people are worried.
But DICE aren't in panic mode because plenty of people actually like the game.
That's cause the fanbase was told not to buy the game , due to pleasing the socially confused wankers .
pretty unusual.
Give me the option to remove the bipod or to turn off the autobipod
Even BF4 had that
Yeah it gets annoying sometimes
Fixed
Already fixed it won't effect your aiming
I'll believe that shit when I see it and get my hands on it again. They said they fixed the game with attrition too ya know
im glad this game got the backlash in a way, the alpha of the game was pretty shit and so was customization but thanks to everyone complaining the current state (post beta) is really good it seems like they are redoing the game in some aspects, after this recent update about the things they changed i think i will pick it up it actually feels and looks like a classic battlefield game BF3 and before not like BF4, BFH and BF1,
i also saw people complaining about the lack of weapons in BFV, i dont understand this, in BF4 we had so many weapons that were just shit and never used there was like one or two weapons per class that got used, with a smaller amount of weapons it means each weapon should feel much different and with different play styles, a small amount of solid unique weapons are better than like 80 crap copy and paste weapons
The Aces woow I completely agree with you man
Yeah, a lot of the weapons in BF4 were similar and boring. But I'd much rather have that kind of freedom of choice that we had in BF4 rather than this crap.
@@ivanrivera3293 but I mean its ww2 not a tone of weapons, I mean I think ppl are not taking this into consideration
@@rondelfrederick3390 Oh, but there was.
Rondel Frederick over 50 different countries participated in ww2, how can you say there " weren't a ton of weapons". Dice has so much to draw from in terms of guns, but they won't because battlefield 5 was a lazy cash grab meant to one up call of duty ww2 from the beginning.
Hamada looks amazing
While everyone's still throwing a fit over the marketing, this game starts to look better and better every week. Loving the attention to detail and removal of some of the explosive spam.
I legitimately have no complains over the weapons, which is a new one. New upgrade system seems similar to BF3/4 attachments. This seems like it's going to be a slower BF4 experience.
Thanks Doc FUCK yeah finally I’m not the only one lol
Gameplay is trash.
Basically every complaint I've seen from the beta has been fixed. It was a beta after all, Battlefield 1 was the same way --- remember those LMGs and snipers?
Stay salty I guess lol, I'm going to be having fun.
Explosive spam makes it look more badass.. Only ones that don't like spam are the idiots that care about their K/D but spam prevents that
Lmao no, explosive spam is unbalanced and unfun. Nothing baddass about dying randomly to someone you can't counter.
The game look's fun but it's not a WW2 game for me
I disagree that it looks fun And agree that it's not a ww2 game
I agree it looks good, but in my personal opinion I prefer battlefield 1
@@thecosmicundead6894
LOL why? This game has no depth what so ever you don't need any skill for any weapon or vehicle. I can drive my plane up to a 100+ killstreak in nearly every 2nd round without even really trying it.
i dont understand the netcode troubles. 5th game and they keep fucking that up. are they really changing their game engine that much game to game to warrant so many fixes or is it just broken to begin with?
SaltFueled netcodeing in general is hard to configure and to make it work. I took some basic practice in codeing in high school and it was difficult.
Netcode was pretty good imo. If you meant TTD, that’s a separate problem with how damage is stacked during each frame.
They are using the Same engine for like forever.. it has issues that keep comming back.
@@gelul12 no they keep updating the engine.
Same engine but keeps changing it
@Keelan there is no game engine as capable as frostbite and that plastic look you are talking about is caused by your graphics settings being set to very low because your pc is a piece of shit.
A lot of water carrying from Jack and LevelCap unfortunately.
Yup. Lol their careers depend on this game. Unfortunately it's dead. I will not be supporting this game.
Still not buying it.
still nobody cares about your choice
I don’t get why you click on the video it’s Bfv if your not getting it why watch things about it ?
Good another copy I have a chance of buying.
You wont be missed by the true bf community...
oh really
x to doubt
I just really hope they fix the gritty, blurry, low fps graphics that wouldn't run on anything short of a 1070
you left the render scale too low. Always tweak preset settings.
@@serenity5892 my render scale was at 100% if I upped it it tanked the fps and made it unplayable, and I have a gtx 1080.
@@DestinAU I have a GTX 1080 as well and always played above 100% in every BF that allowed me to. I never had any issue. In fact, BFV ran even better than BF1 for me. You know that 200% means you're playing in 200% your current resolution right?
*Note: 100% is often blurry on Frostbite engine, it depends of your monitor as I noticed... (best example would be NFS imo)
Remeber it's just a beta i wouldn't expect any amaizing graphics wsit till full game and hopefuly then it will be nice
I ran it on ultra 70 fps with a 960 4gb
They sure are fixing a lot of the game ...what ever happened to "you don't like it then don't buy it" ?!?!?
The guy that said that does no longer work at DICE
They saw their pre order sales and shit a brick and are now in panic mode
That statement had nothing to do with gameplay. He said if you have an issue with women being in the game, don’t buy it.
Damage control, that's what happened.
I hope that it isn't easy to shoot down a V1. It takes a while for a squad to call one in and I don't want one guy in a plane to shoot it down. That sucks. The way to counter a V1 is to RUN AWAY. ITS NOT THAT HARD. It takes forever to reach it's destination anyways
I'd like to see it so if you do spot one and you start putting enough shots on to it, it doesn't destroy it completely but essentially pushes it way off course and it lands in a random area, with the ability to kill friends or foes.
Let me debunk some arguments defending the game.
1: "Lol I cant believe you cant get over what one man said"
Can you really expect there to be no backlash when a community voices its displeasure and the company refuses, insults the community, and gives a horrible excuse regarding a girl's ignorance? Also, do you really think that's the only reason people aren't buying the game?
2: "It's a game, it doesn't have to be realistic"
Well, realism matters a substantial amount when it comes to history. And if you're not going to be realistic, at the very least call it an alternate universe or something. Also, we were promised immersion and realism, and we didn't receive that. Not to mention that when there was feedback about it, we were treated badly.
3: "The people who think that the game will flop are idiots"
No, the people who think the game will flop are people who look at the situation at hand and know that because of the controversy and marketing that this will not be a game that sells well compared to other titles in the franchise. The hype just isn't high enough.
Anyways, I'm free to debate with people. Reply and we can talk.
Elijah Rivera 100% what many feel and want to say
@@ajshemin Thank you.
My ass, "people who care about improvement" are still hating the game after all improvements. It always was a circlejerk, and it still is.
you guys are acting like when they said your "uneducated" you went to your room and had suicidal thoughts or some shit dude relax
The "Just a one man"-argument is obviously used by young kids who don't know what they are talking about. The guy was a fucking chief design officer, not just one random guy off the street.
So many changes, this game will be great loving the improvements, people that are saying this game will fail are those BF4 fanboys who play 24/7 on Metro all day, more of a skill gap in BFV also. Can’t wait
For me, the removal of ridiculous cosmetics etc does not make the game much more immersive. I don't want an overly realistic game, but at least a convincing depiction of WW2 combat.
I wish BF games would have era-based and team-based loadouts. Unscoped bolt-action rifles were the standard for European infantry, and thus should be the most common weapons on the battlefield. Pointman/"Assault" classes should have SMGs/shotguns. Snipers should have scoped rifles. There shouldn't be any holographic sights at all...
Battlefield has never been about realism though, sure we always want a certain degree of it, but you can go too far with realism and it stops being fun. Making sure the game is enjoyable and fun to play should be the priority, it isn't really supposed to be a simulation like the Arma games.
I said "I don't want an overly realistic game". I don't think holo sights and V1 rockets really contribute that much to fun for anybody
Where we draw the line at being too realistic though is entirely subjective. I'm with you on the holo sights thing btw, but the V1 rockets are awesome, when you see one flying above you and it comes crashing down destroying a large area of the battlefield, it really is a game changer and an epic moment that actually causes tension and fear.
Something I'd like to see is maybe the ability to crawl underneath vehicles that have high enough suspension. Although, players could shoot enough tires of said vehicle to crush anyone underneath too.
NL Endeerion u mean like in BF3? Lol
I'm interested to find out how shotguns will be balanced to this new system, its harder to balance shotguns as we've seen in the past as a shotgun player I'm interested to see their ideas
Eric Parlee they balance it by not having any. There’s Only 10 recycled bf1 weapons that’s it.
They'll probably modify the pellet count.
INDIRECT FIRE WAS PERFECT IN 1942! THIS WAS 16 EFFING YEARS AGO?!!! HOW CANT THEY FIGURE IT OUT??????
indirect fire in 1942? You mean... firing main gun at the sky with sherman on an extra large and not destructible empty map where you had 0.001% chance of killing someone by shooting randomly?
One day a battlefield will come out without guns
"We tried bt having guns was hard to implement with 64 people"
Changes sound good man. My faith is slowly being restored.
I’m still buying it, the feel of the game is outstanding completely unique and beautifully polished graphics as well as gameplay. Years of hard work from experienced developers. All of you expect way too much just sit down and enjoy the game!
"Way too much" Is a tad of believability "way too much"???
@Chroniton Battlefield 4 wasn't based on a real conflict
@@1sanitat1 Exactly it was based on the idea of "fun." Something nonexistent in BFV.
Meh too much off the same as the years before I will pass on bfv
jaloviinatonttu BF5 was based on real facts with fiction, just like BF4
I like the idea of dynamically seeing mortarmen and artillary men, it feels authentic and real. But getting killed by them doesn't exactly feel great. I would like to see them strike some balance for Mortars. Maybe you need a spotter or something?
If feels to me as if they're dumbing it down to a Call of Duty kind of thing.
Lol you're an idiot BF V is far from dumbed down
Dumbed downed? Casuals like you were complaining about attrition in the game. Lmao
Dumbing it down lol really this is probably the most hardcore battlefield to date BF4 was way more casual
Only the Rotterdam map is bigger then all maps of cod combined😂
“Dumb it down.”
Right...
You idiots complained about the lack of casual mechanics and you say the game was dumbed down. Are you a moron?
Who seen how the character dodged away from the vehicle that was about to hit him!! Looks dope!
Seemed like that was the knockback from the explosion
I thought it was a new mechanic but naw
Still, cool timing
@@updog4100 ohh that makes sence now, thanks for clearing things up in nice way! :)
One thing they didn't address is the V1 rocket spam. Squads all seem to build up V1's around the same time, so near the end of the map it just becomes rocket spam everywhere.
Ye they need to tweak that
It’s hard to say you won’t have a “god gun” in game. Because if we’re basing these of off (for the most part) realistic performance, then unfortunately some guns can and will out preform most in all categories. It’s just kinda hard to get away from. You have to do some real in house tweaking to get weapons on a “equal” playing field. Otherwise we need to learn that there will be some guns that are best in class for all situations
bfv is just exhausting ... the game isnt even out yet and im already tired of trying to keep up with all the BS and controversy that is just attached at the hip with this poor game :/
you must be weak af then, can't you just look at the game instead of scrolling down in the comments to exhaust yourself?
Wow I never thought I'd be seeing the Krag rifle in a game! Will be sure to try that one.
If I buy the game that is.
I'm surprised that it's in the game as well. But, I won't be buying the game.
Grab popcorn and read the comment section.
So many crybabys down there😭
oh dudde can i have some i am out :(
Shut the fuck up
Killer Champion 😡😡😡
they are just seeking for attention
Hahaha that's exactly what I'm doing
Only a little detail which can improve visual organization:
In the progreesion tab, they could show us a menu including the names of the classes, and after the class is chosen, the corresponding weapons and their level stats would show up...
I just think it's a little bit messy when you want to find one weapon's progress, and you need to search and scroll the whole list of weapons and vehicles...
Even though, congrats Dice for hearing us and making these improvements
Love the content keep it up always very informative.
If I can make a suggestion can you please tone done the ambient music is so repetitive and loud.
THIS VIDEO IS MUSIC TO MY EARS !!!
Same video we have seen 1000 times from every other youtuber..
I refuse to play WWII with fantasy reflector sights. Let alone WWI.
They had those in 1943....
It's a joke bf5!
They were invented in 1900 so considering it’s actually rather possible.
@@fleetofwarships Right, its not a sim, so as long as a its plausible to put them on infantry weapons I really don't see why they're complaining.
I'm actually really happy to hear about what DICE is planning for gunplay. By far my biggest issue with BF1 was how inflexible the weapons felt and how it often felt like battles were won in the customization screen and not on the actual battlefield, and I was afraid that was going to persist into BFV.
I’m lovin the new editing style and format
"Skill based firing method"??? I'll just take my STG-44 Laser Beam and show off my "skill"
@Apocalypse YT They'll either nerf it into the ground or leave it literally untouched. There is no middle ground with DICE. They think that having challenging weapons with strenghts and weaknesses would confuse their players.
@@FrostyAUT I can bet you're saying the same shit for every game & dev. Classic
I am afraid that with lower TTK this game will turn more and more into twitch shooter with more emphasis on eye hand coordination rather than brains.
Christoph von Rentzell that would explain why my mates who switched from COD to play the beta did very very well
Or maybe the game will be about hand eye coordination AND brains?
All good stuff but I don't think you should spawn with a med pouch. That really harms the medic's ability to farm resupply and removes dependence on teammates and map knowledge that should just.. be there.
It should only happen at beginning of a match.Unless its operations then in every section you should spawn with one
The skill to avoid mortar fire is to not get spotted and not sit in one place for very long bunched together with teammates. “Keeping your spacing” is a skill that a lot of people don’t care for because battlefield games are all about run and gun “sprint towards the flag no matter what” gameplay where you can just respawn on your friend who’s 2 feet away from the cap zone. They just need to make it so you have to “dial in” some coordinates without a minimap and make it so you can’t follow your shots with a chase camera. Or forget the whole indirect thing and save it for a team leader who can call it in on some kind of a timer, through squad leader markers. “Need artillery here” “need mortars here” “need supply drop here” etc.
Thank you Jack. I appreciate your interest and dedication to reporting on news. Cheers mate
i really want anther Modern day bf game who is with me?
I think they should have morders right away, this is supposed to be war. That's what happens in war you get bombed and have to run for cover hope to hell you don't get killed. They just cater to the babies that play these games and it's sad.
@@shutomasi Thats what TDM is for
I'm still not sold.....in other news Nathalie ek's got some bloody pins on her!
Both BO4 and BFV focused on gun play this year using predictive recoiling. Awesome!
I am honestly really looking forward to this game. It looks beautiful and i noticed that it rewarded dedicated medics in the beta
Can u make a vid showing the best of BFV so I can show it to my noob friends who thinks COD is better
Tell your friends comparing cod and Battlefield is like comparing Minecraft to Roblox. They look similar and share some mechanics , but play completely different.
Still no M1 Garand or SVT-40? Grease gun? M1 Carbine? No Springfield? No Browning MG? What about the Mosin Nagant? These are very key weapons of WW2 and they aren’t in the game... Shameful.
Tides of War will prob bring them
Hopefully
I want my M1903 Springfield damn it
@@notsern_ tides of war?
@@abishkarjungshah4539 instead of you buying like premium or dlc stuff, the game auto rotates content for everyone. So basically like a season system
oh look, a kid who knows the names of all the weapons in CoD: World At War XD, youve seen any beta gameplay? carbine is there, garand is there, fuck me, ppsh is there as well as mp40 and thompson, we cant know all the weapons based on beta gameplays but i am sure all those will be in there!!
Mortors helped you to dig out campers now what are you supposed to do
John Hower Drop a supply crate on their head
V-1 thier asses? I guess?
Spam high skill grenades with superb "in their general direction" accuracy.
I never understood why people didn’t like mortars. They were awesome in bf1. A great way to counter camping vehicles, and they made combat intense with artillery exploding overhead. It could really help teams advance in the right hands. And it isn’t hard to run away from the mortar’s fire and find the support player firing it.
They haven't completely fixed vehicle physics until parked cars/trolleys actually get PUSHED around by tanks, trucks, and other heavy vehicles (rather than being superglued to the ground). Visceral actually fixed this problem in BF Hardline. Unfortunately DICE still hasn't figured out how to implement this, and I'm not feeling very confident that it will be fixed in BFV either.
Still not buying BF5.
@Apocalypse YT I'll manage to carry on, thank you.
Good for you, no one cares
@@bagofspaghetti_7777 that's your opinion, after all.
What will they ever do?
@@korno96 move on to something better. Hopefully and eventually.
BFV is going to be a great game. It's sad that people still can't get over what one man said.
Well, you can't really expect people to be calm when they're lied to about "immersion" and "realism." And when they voice their complaints, the company refuses to listen and insults them in the process.
That's their choice, and I think people should accept that. Yes, I also want them to make the game more realistic and stuff, but do you know what? It doesn't really matter that much.
Don't know about you but I can't help but be a shitter with all these kids whining about like they own you, dissing something you worked your ass off to create. There is a way to complaint as well and getting things resolved takes patience.
I'm not going to play it because I hate what they're doing with the game, I couldn't give less of a shit about that.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, BF3 and BF4 were graphically fantastic and had brilliant weapon variety, however, when it came to teamwork, they still had very little on BF1942, BF2 or BF2142. Mortar was infinitely worse than Commander artillery - an ability that was on a CD and one could avoid after having memorized the timers. I like that BFV is adopting some of the elements that made older BF's so robust. That said, I still believe that SL only spawn is a must; having the ability to spawn on anyone only fractures a squad and just propagates the Rambo approach.
I think the fix the mortars would be treating him like heavy machine guns. They are stuck in one spot of the map which will allow team to know exactly where they're firing from and to take over the mortar position
I want the ability to take ammo and health of players like in Hardline. Thumbs up if you agree !
Ammo you can.
Someone tell me why you all think that this game is a mess just want to know
The assualt class is odd since they got the long range weapons when they should have cqc weapons since they are you go to guys for blowing shit up and clearing house. I like the moving artelliary, some map layouts in BFV, no suppressive fire, low ammo, etc. but beyond that it essentially a more fixed progression of battlefield compared to previous battlefield games which had destruction and freedom to design your own arsenal which is absent in BFV. Even BF1 had more freedom since they had different versions of the same gun to choose from without back tracking. So yeah, maybe I'll get this game, just to mess around with but not for $60.
Dice might work on the weapon aspects but even you got admit that some perks are just odd, why do you need faster bullets? Either way it is a rough game to buy.
Very few people will realistically be able to give you an answer. Most of them are just farming for upvotes by commenting some stupid unoriginal joke that has on every BFV video 100x over. They had a messy first few weeks via terrible marketing and releasing one of the worst trailers of all time as their official first trailer for the game. However, since that initial debacle it has been nothing but positives IMO. It is not perfect, but they are listening and working on it, you can tell they really want to get this right.
Southern .guitarist I get what your saying but these features seem to be fixable and by the looks of it dice is listening to the player base as normal
Kyle W yeah I kinda got the impression that it was just a bunch of triggered neck beards who actually cared if women were in a video game
😂😂😂 the comments are hysterical! This game will be amazing as it was in the beta with only 10% enabled on a small 11gb download. The things we saw weren't implemented for a reason, dice confirmed it. But, the things they say that they are adding we're already there just not the way they wanted it for the size of the download. Most of these haters are cod fan boys who don't know what Battlefield is. BFV is a huge upgrade from it's predecessors.. every thing is scaling in a huge positive way.
*Edit* funny part is 99% of you watch BFV videos because it's peaked your interested to a great degree, but 70% of that 99% feel compelled to just say absolute trash about this game excercising your right to do so..
jamesb8488 historically accurat😂
So true
Tell me, what did you enjoy about the beta, because I didn't see much amazement, but I want to hear your side
Connor Spinner The gunplay was insanely good, both maps were awesome, I had some very good only in BF moments
How HYSTERICALLY FUNNY is it that ironsights have been in Battlefield games since 2005 with Battlefield 2 (not counting sniper scopes who where in from the start). And it's now 2018 and they're actually going to represent where your bullets will go. Just absolutely HYSTERICAL!
Why don't we remove snipers too? Battlefield is suppose to chaotic and sometimes you can't just avoid a death. 'It's a battlefield'
This game is getting better every week
So they’re putting in women (historically accurate only in some cases) but not mortars which were actually in the war
Woman is for cosmetics . Mortars aren't in because they're trying to reduce explosive spam. These features in the game have genuine explanations. *THINK* before you *SPEAK.*
To reiterate what Samuel said... THINK.
People are still paying any sort of attention to BFV?
Yes. Some of us are actually interested.
MrLeva115 You know you're one of those people, right?
case cao not exactly. This was in my recommended, however; I couldn’t care less about BFV
MrLeva115 You cared enough to click the video and leave a comment.
@@__asher__ If you watch a video and then leave a comment, you are giving attention to the video. You are joking right?
How many of you canceled the preorder? My friend and I canceled the same day Playstation sent the email saying you could cancel and get a refund.
What made you cancel your preorder?
Honestly, I find "patterned" recoil to be an absolutely abhorrent game mechanic. If possible, weapon recoil from sprayed gunfire should be randomized to a limited extent. That way, good players will learn to burst fire efficiently rather than relying on learning the bizarre concept of preprogrammed recoil patterns.
from a pure gameplay perspective this just looks great but I am really worried about the campain with that disabled woman and I really hope that there are no woman solider exept maybe in the sovjet army if therý are ven in the main game I just hope it doesn't turn into a SJ Cringefest
This game will be epic!
Wha wha what what, soo dice treated there fans like shit, told them not to buy it if u dont like it, then dice sees the presales and now all of a suden they are trying to make the pple that makes them rich happy, huh, weird times we live it
mander man ya😆😆😆this dev talks came all of a sudden after pre order sales chart shown up
I remember reading somewhere that a game should not be unnecessarily difficult as it turns to be aggravating which takes away the enjoyment. Switch on a console/PC play and enjoy, miss that you miss everything.
I’m glad dice is actually willing to change the core mechanics of the game. A thing most developers would keep away from at all costs.
They know they messed up, and they did, but that doesn’t mean they aren’t going to try and fix it.
They had an idea and thought the community would like it, it addressed several major issues which have plagued battlefield for a long time (grenade spam, one man army soldiers, 80 kill streak planes and tanks)
And people didn’t like it, so they are going back on it to an extent. I applaud them
I'm worried that this will be one of the best bf's people won't play. The changes are exciting.
Dizcrowell me too man, I love the direction they’re going with this one! I hope they stick with the more squad based, hardcore direction for future battlefields.
give them time. Don't be rude. The woman's disability in the first trailer made them think about their own so they are recovering from depression. They will buy it anyway.
What do you mean I can't be a transgender woman in a wheel chair?! This is so sexist I'm offended
Is it just me or is BFV just a BF1 reskin with some building mechanics added in and different guns? I mean I'm glad the developers hear the community and try to adjust accordingly, but my main gripe with BF1 was how boring it got, sure in BFV you can upgrade weapons more and there's more customization overall for the player, but I just dont see this game lasting very long. I think Battlefield/Dice needs to realize they have a very large portion of people that want only modern shooter based BF games, and I would have to agree with them with the exception of Battlefield Vietnam. IMO BF3 and BF4 have infinitely more replayability than BF1 did and that BFV will have
I can somewhat see what you're saying.
@@antoniskazou I see what you're saying, but there isn't enough difference between BF1 and BFV for me to want to purchase BFV. I bought BF3 cause it had enough new features that BFBC2 didnt have and the same for BF3 going onto BF4. But I guess everyone gauges things differently and all things in life really end up boiling down to opinion
@@lexm0 in BF3 we could finally go prone. That was some game changing stuff right there. I can finally use a crater for cover. I agree that BF3 offered a lot of things that wasn't there in BFBC2, as for BF4 it feels different to BF3.
The gameplay is going to be drastically different from bf1. Bf3 and Bf4 were far more similar to one another
A larger part of the community likes diversity in the time period that game is set, modern shooters get boring after awhile as would any setting if done repeatedly over and over again.
Why don't they allow us to pick a calibre, then based on that calibre you'll get your DPS - it would throw out the authenticity, but give people more customization options when it comes to using guns.
Thank you Jack for bringing us another great video full of good information!!! I hope they remove auto aim completely on console, as this was the most frustrating thing of the beta. Many times I would aim and shot at a player, and a second player would come close to my initial target, having my aim pulled from the first target to the second because of the auto aim! It happened quick of course, but this almost always resulted in my death. It was very frustrating, and happened a lot.
Sounds great but still can't get the game becuase of how they treated there fans and history.
Were they going for historical accuracy?
@@thegreatODEN1 ww2 game my guy we expect a little bit of realism
@@FELCHINGTON-- Rejoice! There is "a little bit of realism", is there not? But also, some artistic liberty. That is the beauty of art.
@@andrewmiller2971 *bully hunter78 wants to know your location*
too litle too late not gonna buy it, 2nd one after hardline...something smell off with this one
They get rid of the females yet ?
Should they?
Yikes
@@thegreatODEN1 Since it caused backlash, and since it's kinda disrespectful to the veterans and heroes of the war, YES!
I wish they do it like the BF4 attachment system again - attachment improves some stats of the gun but have drawbacks, with no "paths" to follow.
Examples in BF4: Heavy barrel = More accuracy and recoil; Compensator = Less recoil and more spread.
I think this brings more variety to the gun upgrades, and forces players to think up and experiment with setups to fit their guns and play style.
Honestly you and LevelCap and Westie should receive a big check in the mail for all basically saving the game sales as much as possible
You were supposed to promote the game, not destroy it!
S Lovell Bring balance to the game! Not leave it in darkness!
Upgrading rpm...what kind of Call of Duty trash is that? This franchise has been destroyed.
You can get higher ROF with different calibers, you know? Then you'll feel the need to push the realism so faaaaaaaar to hate on this game I guess.
the gas operating system, barrel, mussel, and trigger system all influence automatic reloading weapons fire rate. changing any of these items in a weapon and positively or negatively affect the weapons fire rate. Historically the MG42 put out 1,200 Rounds per Minute, there is no easily searched info that indicates that there were variants that indicate a faster or slower RPM. With the exception of the predecessor being the MG34. Considering that I actively consider this game franchise as Science Fiction I don't particularly care that they are allowing for upgraded RPMs since it is plausible.
I think they ruined this game
Night Fury no
yes to late to redeem it self, i love battlefield but they fell in to feminists, why the British snipers females Asians lmao
Some bullets have your name on them. A mortar round is more of a “to whom it may concern.”
I heard this is going to flop, yet I still see stuff like this. Is there hope for Battlefield 5?
Too complicated for a game. Confusing for casual gamer.
And when a player sees a women in a ww2 game 😂 ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
@@greenfrogg565 that will be like pubg
This is the most casual battlefield game by far, just look at the game play trailer
@@pyroparagon8945 that's your opinion
@@dipanjanbiswas4924 I suppose it is, but it is also the opinion of the popular opinion on Battlefield, the "dumbing down" of battlefield is considered to be real
Problematic if true