➡Instagram - instagram.com/boorayperry/ ➡Podcast - photobomb.buzzsprout.com/ ➡Gear - boorayperry.com/boorays-gear/ ➡Booray Explains - tinyurl.com/3e7w8zjt CORRECTION: The X-T5 has 1,840,000 screen dots. The X-H2 has 1,620,000. Why they would give the X-T5 better screen resolution is beyond me.
I bought the X T-5 because I have experience with the X T-1 and X-T-2 so I feel more confident with the X T-5. However my Corel Aftershot software won't recognize the raw X T-5 files. I'll be happy when Corel produces a version compatible with the X T-5! Pax Vobiscum
A very good video and thorough analysis. You missed two things about the X-T5 though. One, it is 4-1/2 oz lighter than the X-H2 and second is that the screen is a three-way tilt not just two-way. I tried both of these cameras and chose the X-T5, the noticeable lighter weight and size being one of my deciding considerations. Another deciding factor was the $200 extra body cost plus another $200 -to $300 for new memory cards that cannot be used in any of my other cameras. The side tilt option on the screen is very good for low shots with the camera in vertical orientation and also candid sideways shots in horizontal positions which I like but was not a deciding factor. I have been making photos for 75 years (yes, since 1948) and I prefer dials, and since I wear trifocals I can glance at them easily and I do not care for the little display screen on top of the X-H2.. I use only prime lens and I can count clicks on the aperture ring from my preferred setting without looking and often I use a fully manual lens. I have never shot videos nor do I intend to. The same goes for selfies. And I only shoot RAW so 90% of either of these two cameras (and other digitals) is a waste of space and money for me. Overall the X-T5 is the one that best fits my own needs, and I appreciate your detailed analysis of the two as it convinces me that I made the right choice for my style. I just recently happened onto your channel, and it is so refreshing to hear from a real photographer as opposed to the predominantly adolescent reviewers whom I turn off as soon as I hear the word "awesome".
I will have to rent both bodies to evaluate the ergonomics. I personally prefer the PSAM format and I’ve been shooting, (developing too ) since ‘64. I like keeping m6 eye in the viewfinder and PSAM , the XH2 would allow 30:04 me to do just that. Certainly can learn the XT 5 with John Peltier videos. The weight and size are extremely important so renting will help me select the right camera for me. I also shot with a Sony RX100M7 a true pocket camera with 20+ mp and a great back up.
By far the best comparison between these 2 cameras. You just nail the reasons for the choice. Both cameras are superb but the ergonomics and the other features for the relatively small increase in cost has sold me on the H2. Your manner in distilling the points into practical points is outstanding. Many thanks for assisting me with the choice. I have the Xt2 which I have used for many years and will keep this for a light weight compact camera for street and travel and use the H2 for more studio work and using large lenses. Well done again. I am so happy I found your channel.
This was hands down the most helpful video I’ve seen, thank you so much! I’ve been agonizing for the past several days wondering what I should get to upgrade my x-t1, and while I’m a value oriented guy and recognized the value and understood I don’t need the video, I just couldn’t let go of the dials of the xt line until you explained the ease of the pasm and the pistol grip. Makes so much sense! I also love being able to protect my screen as well. You’ve got a subscriber in me and I look forward to all your future vidoes!
I almost went X-H2, but glad I finally went with the X-T5 to replace my X-T3. I'm a stills photographer and that screen on the X-T5 was my kicker along with the classic look.
The screen!! The only reason I didn’t go xh2. All my twin reflex shooting made me a waist shooter and the fully articulated screen blacks in and out in landscape waist shooting …. (Street portraits)
I've been using an X-T4 with Fuji long glass as my "lightweight" kit for avian photography. I have to admit my preferred cameras have been a pair of Nikon D500s for one big reason... these Nikons were really designed for sports and nature and have HUGE buffers. Plus the RAW files are gorgeous and easy to work with. But there is something magical about Fuji colors. Anyway, I was set to grab an X-T5 (my X-T4 is on eBay) when I learned it still had the tiny buffer of the X-T4. I don't sit on the shutter typically; I shoot in (hopefully)well timed bursts to capture peak action. But occasionally I ran into some bald eagle aerial battles where the action was hot and heavy and I found myself holding the shutter down much longer than usual. My Nikons can fire off about 240 RAW files before the buffer fills and starts to slow down. My X-T4 pooped out several times one day while shooting some heavy eagle action. Exasperating and I switched back to the Nikons that day. Since the X-H2 has a MUCH bigger buffer, that is a major plus. The Nikon D500s also use the Compact Flash cards anyway and I have a lot of them. As much as I love the X-T4 aesthetics (my first camera was a Nikkormat film camera), looks don't make images. I also have a Nikon Z7II which is more in line aesthetically (and functionally) with the X-H2. And I love it at work where we do event photography. But I think the X-H2 with the Fuji 100-400 and my new Fuji 150-600 should be just fine. Still keeping the D500s (both have shutter replacements done at about 2 million activations, well past their stated useful life). Old habits die hard. I have lots of Fuji glass and am really looking forward to the X-H2!
I went for the X-H2 essentially for the better grip and better viewfinder. The X-T5 grip is fine only if you use small primes but forget handling big zooms or high end Fuji primes for a whole day with it. Admittedly, the PSAM is a better way to manage a camera and the customs settings are finally much more convenient than I thought. Yes I love the retro look of the X-T5 but if you look for higher efficiency, the X-H2 is the way to go. The perfect combination would be an X-H2 + an X100V for lighter / more discreet shooting sessions
I like consistency. I like to work with either PASM or dials. The idea of going back and forth between the wheels and top dials to set the aperture or shutter speed to me defeats the purpose of simplifying things which is what I loved about film cameras in the 80s. They had the triangle plus compensation on the top dials and the aperture on the lens and that was it. I was hoping I work with dials all the time, which intuitively seems the way to go. Upon thinking about this and finding this video, I have come to the realization that the X-H2 would work better for me simply because if I had to remember every time which combination of dial settings I need to set to be in a particular shooting mode, that would drive me insane. Also, the idea of working sometimes with old style dials and sometimes with a wheel to set the shutter speeds is definitely a deal breaker for me. Again, I don’t like hidden stuff but if the camera has quick-access and coherent combination of buttons for adjusting/checking the iso, aperture, shutter speed, and exposure compensation, then that’s a winner to me. Secondary buttons to me are white balance, autofocus and shutter modes. If those are also easily accessible through a shift-second-button combo, then everything else can be shifted to menus. The nice thing is that white balance is already a dedicated and quick-access button on the X-H2. So, with the X-H2 you get the triangle on the wheels and the iso and white balance through quick access buttons, what more do you want? That is 90% of what I use. At one point size mattered to me but after holding both, that became a moot point for me. Someone looking from the other size of the lens won’t notice the size difference. The H2 does feel a little heavier but will probably feel more balance with larger lenses. The location of the stick and the number of customization buttons are a great bonus in the H2, but then you add the larger buffer, and this makes my choice easier. Video is secondary to me; either camera would have worked fine for me in this area. I do think for strictly photography, the LCD tilt style on the X-T5 is better. For videographers, not so much. I am sure other folks will like the X-T5. I love the look of this camera 100%, but in the end, I’ll go with the boring yet practical camera for me. I know myself. Thanks to Fuji for giving us options.
Everywhere I check the difference is $300, not $200. But, I still agree that the X-H2 is a better value. However, even with big hands, I went for the X-T5. I am not a professional, but a hobbyist. I never shoot video. I love the retro SLR look and feel in use of the X-T5. It has a better grip than either my X-T1 or X-T3. The X-H2 would not make me want to pick it up and shoot. I find it easy to make quick on the fly changes with the dials on the X-T series.. The X-T5 is my X100v.
you can set video on preset as well. only one klick to change from photo to video. I am using the X-H2 mostly for 8K video. CF Express is unfortunately needed for 8K video. Currently I am wondering about the battery grip price.
Good points, some apply and some don’t to my usage scenario, but I had not considered before, like the PASM difference and joystick. Big differences. Thanks 👍🏼
That's hard to say because those two cameras are designed for different purposes. If you want a camera that you can carry with you everyday then I would stay with the Leica. If you want a camera for professional work then I would switch to the Fuji.
Thanks for a really helpful video! I think if I were shopping for one of these two as my primary working camera, I'd be right there with you at the X-H2; but I'm actually looking for something my wife might occasionally be willing to tote and use for light duty to get better photos than a phone, and the X-T5's smaller size and slightly lighter weight work in its favor - and it's nice to look at, which ain't nothing. I like that both of these seem to use the same batteries as the GFX cameras, since I've already got a couple of those chargers around the house, and my use of the GFX 100 II has sold me on how close to a usable photo right out of the camera I can get using one of the Fuji film looks (a feature set which seemed nothing but silly until I actually used them, having found out that they're also available for raw files processed in Lightroom)! ...and to correct just one thing in your video: the X-H2 obviously isn't Fuji's best camera, that's the GFX series and in particular the GFX 100 II now. I'm absolutely gobsmacked by the quality I'm getting out of that damned thing, even in low natural light. But it's huge and heavy and expensive, as are the lenses. But don't try one unless you want to risk buying one! The 55/1.7 is an addictive choice of glass to go with it, or the 110 if you're a short tele person.
Thank you, very helpful. I would also have preferred two UHS ii cards slots, but have bought the XH2 for stills photography. I'm over 60 now and the better grip, top screen, PASM and improved weather sealing make the XH2 the right choice, (for me). Thank you for this excellent comparison.
My primary reason for preferring the X-T5 LCD screen function is for landscape photography where I need an L bracket. The screen in the X-T4 and the X-H models does not play well with an L bracket.
I recently received my X-T5 and am quite happy with it. I am happy to see that Fuji seems to be different in lines a bit where X-H is truly hybrid (PASM + Vari angle screen) and X-T is primarily photographic in focus with exposure dials and 3-way flip. They had a few years where they were trying to find themselves with models and it seems they have figured it out. I am really loving my X-T5 (with MHG-XT5) as it pretty much is perfect for me. No real complaints. I did try out an X-H2s for a week rental, and did find it to work quite well, but I just can’t stand the vari-angle screen for my shooting style…I would rip it off eventually as it would get tangled in the strap and the PASM dial just isn’t something I like. Again, so happy we seem to have a clear-er differentiation in lines and chooses in the Fuji lineup.
You can pick up aftermarket L Grips for the X-T5 to improve ergonomics, the Fuji one is a ridiculous price but there are much cheaper options, smallrig one for example.
Appreciate the comments…. I’m not a professional photographer and don’t mind taking the time to turn dials. After trying one of the older X-T cameras, I love the dials and the smaller form and weight. I just sold my Canon R and ordered the X-T5.
Which one (including the -X-H2S) has the fastest AF specifically birds in flight? I'm using an X-T2, and the 100-400, and it's better than I thought, but I knew I would upgrade at some point.
Loved your video! Wish I'd found this video before I bought my camera... It would have made the decision a whole lot easier. I spent a long time agonizing over the choice between the XT5, the H2, and the H2S. Ultimately I went with the H2 and everything you said in your review confirmed that I did make the correct decision. I've been shooting an XT4 for 4 years now. I shoot professionally, I also do quite a bit of video but nothing fancy just basic talking head stuff. I am super happy with the H2. Lots of people claim there's not much of a difference between 40 megapixels and 24 megapixels but I disagree. I was blown away by the image quality, totally happy. I was thinking that I should probably plan on getting an H2S to compliment the H2, but now that I've been playing with the video on the H2 I don't really feel the need for the H2S, at least not for what I do. The H2 video is just fine. I also was not too fond of the idea of the compact flash, but the reality is the CF is faster and that's why they chose it. If you want the high performance results you've got to have the hardware to support it. I have pretty big hands, the ergonomics of the H2 suit me just fine. I think it is more comfortable to hold than my XT4. I like that big bulge it gives me a solid grip on the camera. This is the first video of yours that I've seen, you did such a great job with it I guess I better subscribe. Have a great day!
@@BoorayPerry something I don't remember you mentioning in your review is the improvement in the low light sensitivity. I often shoot in "available darkness" and I'm usually operating close to the edge of what's feasible. So far what I'm finding is that the light sensitivity of the H2 is about twice that of the XT4. I don't know how they are pulling this off... Double the resolution and double the light sensitivity! That's not even supposed to be possible. But they did it.
Great video and I agree with you. I bought both and am using both for now, but I think I might keep the X-H2. It feels better in my hand, a better grip, the EVF is so much better than that of the X-T5. I love the new 56mm 1.2 lens, but it just looks a little too big on the X-T5 body. Close call, but the X-H2 probably the better camera for me.
Thanks for your video! However, I need to disagree on the "memory cards" part. I don't shoot video either, but I do like to shoot burst mode of action (wildlife, sports). The CF express card allows you for continuous burst, without filling the camera's internal buffer.
I love the old school feel of the X-T line but also the physical handling (and IBIS) of my X-H1. Trading my X-H1 now for an H2 but keeping my old X-T3 so the best of both worlds. Thanks for your walk through of both models. It’s worth pointing out that the PASM dial is a marked change to even the original H model.
Didn't think I'd stay for the full video, but great no-nonsense discussion. Having used cameras with similar ergonomics as the X-T5 I know how much that can affect your photography and highlighted how much of a factor that is in choosing between the H2 and T5, my next decision is between the H2 and the H2s.
For me (having an X-T4) , the only truly compelling reason I'd like the X-H2 is for the sensor. I really feel they shortchanged the X-T5; especially the flip-screen, a real deal breaker. But for now, I'll stay with my X-t4 since you rarely (IMO) need the difference between 26 and 40 MP. Great video; really a good insight to what matters!
I also kept my XT4 over the XT5. I feel like the build quality is a downgrade and you're not getting your money's worth to justify the price difference between the XT4 and XT5 however I really wanted the 40mp because I like to crop in sometimes and recompose and opted for the XH2 to accompany my XT4. I feel it's worthy of the price difference because of the better ergonomics and weather sealing and the EVF.
@@michamilka you know, you make a very good point about the X-T4 build quality. When I first got my X-T4, I was amazed at just how classic and expensive feeling it was. To this day, every time I pick it up (I have the silver version), it reminds me of the really nice cameras of the past that used film. This may sound funny, but I really feel that when a device that impresses you with its feel, lends itself to you doing better and more serious/precise work because you’re inspired to be using such a fine instrument. I also, do-not like how they changed the ergonomics of the X-T5; I feel that Fuji took a step backwards on this. I have never seen an X-H2 in the flesh, so we’ll have to check it out. I too, do a lot of cropping and yes, 40+ megapixel would be better for sure. But I’ve decided to just be more mindful of what I think I would likely have the cropping to be. So even if I get a bigger sensor in the future, I will certainly keep my X-T4. And even though some people feel it excessive, sometimes it’s better to just buy an additional item, even if it’s more expensive and keep your original one. Too often, I’ve been most-regretful of getting rid of something I was fond of, just because I thought I should sacrifice one for the other. Thanks for bringing this up, because I was a little bit timid to mention it! 😉
Mr. Booray Perry, What a great and thoroughly enjoyable video! I am considering each camera and your presentation was really, really helpful. Thank you, thank you, thank you! Best regards always. James McC., Philadelphia
I like the XT5, I am a Nikon shooter and the weight of my Nikon D850 is a chore and a task...even after I take the battery grip off😱 For Me that XT5 is a dream come true...I can carry that all day long and not complain....
I was using three XT4 bodies for weddings. I now replaced two of them with XT5s. I’m liking the cameras, but find the RAW files are a lot more contrasty and more prone to magnenta. Did you notice that or with the XH2?
@@BoorayPerry I do to, especially after decades of shooting film, but I find the Xt4 files easier to get my desired result. Next time you get a chance, see if you can see the difference between the two. It’s not a problem, but it does add another layer of work when trying to match them in Lightroom…
Thanks for this video. I do almost exclusively photography and was excited about the XT5 until I found out that it is the first XT camera not to offer a vertical grip (battery grip). The extra battery is nice but I have used the grips more for the vertical trigger shooting portraits and I like the switch to go from normal to boost mode. I got lucky with a recent sale and was able to pick up the XH2 with a free Fuji battery grip for only $150 more than the XT5. I also have large hands and so I actually spent the same amount of money as getting the XT5 with its Fuji grip, which, of course doesn’t give you extra power or a vertical trigger. Plus I also use the viewfinder much more than the back of the camera and the extra resolution is also wonderful. And right now you can get the Fuji grip by itself on sale for half price for $199. at B&H and other retailers. Honestly, once you have tried a grip with a vertical trigger for portraits, it’s just awkward not to use it.
Thanks Booray for an interesting comparison. I shoot 4 minutes long exposure and need sensor/processing cooling. Some years ago I went from X-T2 to X-H1 only because of better cooling. How would the X-T5 handle heat with an even bigger sensor and faster processor than the old X-T2 (which cuased major issues for me with hot pixels)? Inputs, pls
Here in Lima Fujifilm has them both on sale, and curiously they end up both at the same price with the n16-80mm f4. Actually , the XH2 was 50$ less !! so that closed the deal. I bought the XH2 :)
For the same reasons you mention, the Xh2 is also my go-to camera (my big hands, ergonomics, and weather sealing, especially important when you live far into the arctic circle) I don't own one yet, tho. My question is related to the problem some XH2 owners have highlighted and that is "freezing"... that sometimes the camera is freezing during operation and the only way to bring it back to life again is to take the battery out and in again. For me who makes a lots of time-lapses that would be a huge problem and that makes me hesitant to buy XH2, although I'v already bought some Fuji.lenses. Have you heard about this freezing issue, or have you had this problem with you own XH2? Thanks!🙏
Hi Booray, I'm a photography enthusiast & I have the X-T4 & the X-H2 as well. I've got to say what you describe in your video about the ease of use of the handgrip, PSAM dials, EVF Flip around screen + etc is so so true . I was hestitating to get X-H2 & X-T5 in the begining as well. But now, I'm glad to say I know I've made the right choice especially when I'm shooting with both cameras (on a Holdfast MM Bridle Leather) each with a XF Fuji prime lens at a wedding event recently. The whole experience on the X-H2 was so much more better plus the ease of use & speed totally as you've descibe in your video. Another thing I would like to add is, the buttons, the joystick & the whole feel to the camera in general does somehow feels much more premium. Thanks for making this video Booray. Cheers ;)
Thanks for watching! I know that I am in the minority on this. Fuji fans love the dials and I get it I really do. I love them too and if I was just a hobbyist I would use the X-T5 (or maybe if I just shot smaller primes) but once the big zoom goes on the camera I want the X-H2. I also think that the people who love the dials tend to be people who don't change there setting as often as I do and maybe don't require reading glasses to read them :)
When you said, take the video out that blew my mind, because that is what I have been posting on many forums and the Fuji film Facebook page make a camera with no video whatsoever. Everyone who wants a great camera will flock to that camera.
I am a new subscriber to this channel and current Sony aps-c user for years (2014). I don’t want to go full frame, I take photos for my personal enjoyment, family, travel, church events. I take a lot of photos of planes at museums and boats at boat shows. I am invested in a bigger printer at home. Would 40mp give me more definition, detail then my current 24mp? I use sigma glass (trifecta). I don’t mind switching to Fuji, especially knowing I can get basically all the same glass. I would like to make this decision before purchasing that viltrox 75mm.
Fuji's 24 megapixel sensor is a great sensor and I used it for years. For me, the greatest benefit of the 40 megapixel sensor is the ability to crop more. This isn't something that most photographers need.
Very interesting video Booray. I like how you personalized it. Just returned my X-H2 today...the LCD was blacking out occasionally, which was irritating and couldn't figure out why. Getting a replacement X-H2 anyway...like the feel and the 40 mp.
Very thourough comparison....but I'm still not convinced the X-H2 is the best choice for me. I have 3 X-H1 bodies and really like them for studio video work where they remain set up all the time. I'm now looking for a body for mostly photography and like shooting with an L-Bracket. This seems like it could be cumbersome with the flip-out screen. Any thoughts?
Than you for this comparison. I recently bought into the Fuji System (XT5) and have purchased a lot of glass for it. It was meant to be second camera to my work camera, a Sony A7R5, which I also have a lot $$ invested in glass. I love both systems for very different reasons. There's just something about those Fuji images though! It has taken time to get used to the cool dials and yes, I love the way it looks and performs. I would like to use it has my second camera for an upcoming wedding, but you're so right about the dials slowing you down. I have been afraid to take the chance of getting myself all confused. I'm not ready to come out of the Sony world and this video really helped me to realize that if I trade up to H-H2, bouncing between the cameras will be a whole lot less complicated with the PASM dial. I can even set up both cameras very simliar. Wish me luck! lol
This is a great review. I like the xt5 and the xh2, but I'm a serious amateur and really don't need 40mp. I'm thinking about the xs20 - I just wish it was weather sealed. (Also wish it had the d-pad). Do you have any experience with the OM1 or OM5? I like many features about Fugi better (aperture on lense) but the OM are famous for weather sealing and image stabilization. Thanks for your great reviews.
@@BoorayPerry I was wondering if i had edited this presets in computer with 1/6 step EV values for exposure bracketing and then export this edited presets back to camera, if this shutter speeds would work? Probably not. Sometimes the camera interface is limited displaying 1/3 stops, but it can take any number and round to closest working shutter speed.
I'm seriously considering upgrading my X-T3 gripped bodies and am leaning hard towards the X-H2. I'm pretty sure it won't take that long to get used to the more (Canon'ish) top layout after using those cameras for years previously. Thanks for your video efforts, very informative.
What I like about Fujifilm is that they upgraded their cameras for a specific photographer need’s without having to break the bank. I’ve been shooting XT3 for quite sometime however I need a camera for wildlife photography especially BIF. I don’t need to spend 2 grand XH2S and change my SD cards. So we now have choices and my choice would be the XT5. Just a matter of options that I love. Happy shooting Aloha 🙏🏼
I bought an XT4 thinking Id like a hybrid but tbh haven't really done that much video. I have an x100v that gets more use but think I'll wait until I see whats in store for a new XPro before I upgrade.
Hi, I own and tested almost all Fuji models. Beside my Gfx which is another level and not compatible with other x series, I bought xt5 to have 40 mp for my photography need. As you said it is so beautiful specially the silver one, but after while I found I never use any of physical wheels! I set aperture and shutter speed as well as iso on front and back wheels with push and click to switch between. Also red batch lenses on xt5 body are not balanced but on xh body look much better. Xh1 with 26 mp was not enough for me and Gfx is very heavy and difficult for walking around, and again I think xh2 would be good replace on my Gfx with bulky lenses, specially for my age in 60! So eventually I am planning to set xh2 with 3 red batch lenses + versatile camera (hopefully new x1006). What do you think?
@@BoorayPerry really?1 I am happy that i came to this right final decision after years of buying and testing and selling! Now with your words I’m more confident to do this. Only 2 issues are on my way: 1. Shall I gain same deep image result by crop sensor 40mp vs medium format 102 mp of gfx100s? And 2: how can I sell my gfx100s body and few gf lenses?
As a woman with small hands, I do love the ergonomics of the xt4, I can hold it a very long time :) So, I am glad that there are options for smaller hands, as well as bigger hands :)
Nice video, thanks :) I already have a XT5, loving it, but i want a second camera for my professional shoots (documentary style). So a second camera for having a back up, but not only. Also for having one prime on each body (as I don’t like zoom), carrying both cameras with a double strap. First I was going for another XT5. Same ergonomics, same tactile memories for using both, it seems the natural way to go. However, the XH2 could be a good choice too, especially in order to use bigger lenses on it (potentially a 50-140. The 18mm will be mainly sticked to the XT5, and longer focals lengths on my future second body, XT or XH) but I know there is a good grip available for the XT5 (even if it’s not a battery grip). I’m also afraid that I could get confused in the different ergonomics with one XT5 in my left hand and one XH2 in my right 😅 but I probably could get used to it as you do with the non-clickable wheels. I don’t do video neither BUT it’s an option in the future so having the XH2 specs could be a good thing indeed. Any thoughts on that? Do you shoot with one body only? Thanks :)
i use a xt3 and a x100v , have 10-24, 1655 and 50-140 with the tlc.... i shoot mostly dog sports ...how much would the xh2 an upgrade for this u think ? Couild trade some of my stuff i dont realy need for it . Thanks !
I don't know the X-T3 well but I don't think it has IBIS. Also, the auto focus on the X-H2 will be much better and it's 40mp. It's a considerable upgrade I think but do you really need it? That's the question. :)
Great video!!! Thanks. Have you tried low light situations with either of these? I am very interested in how this new sensor performs in low light with fast (er) Fuji glass Thanks again.
I have both cameras why ,why not, they are both very good camera, the biggest difference is not what is in the body but the body itself. So I use the XH2 for larger glass, I don't shoot video, I'm a stills photogrpher.and I photograph a bunch of different subjects some require larger lens like the 100-400 mm Fujifilm lens, it just works better on the XH2, the XT5 and other Xt bodys is just fun camera to use.
Great timing to find this video! I bought the xHS2 and want to get a 2nd. Moving from SONY A7S3 and A7R4. Was set on buying XT5 until this video. Now XH2 instead. 40 mpx / PASM / CF X / 8k ( for Special video moments) and screen! Sold . Thanks. Really well scripted
It will be interesting to see what happens with the X-pro 4. (Hopefully a different LCD). How do you like the erganomics of the X-pro 3 vs the Xh-2? I got to hold a Xh-2s yesterday and thought it felt a bit "thick". It did feel better, however, than the OM-1. I'm strongly leaning towards the Xh-2. I like the Sony a7iv but to get a lense with an aperture ring you have to buy g - master glass which is very expensive.
@@BoorayPerry I really like your thoughts, mentioned in a video, about the Xh 2 with the 18-55 2.8 lense. That's a bit more expensive than "kit lense" but as a system starting point it is almost perfect and still around $2,800. I could the later add a 35mm 1.4 and these two would do 90% of what I want to do. Extremely less expensive than a Sony A7iv with equivalent g-master glass or a similar Canon system.
Hi Booray, great video. I agree with you regarding the ergonomics of the X-H2 being better than the X-T5,particularly since there is NO battery grip option for the X-T5. ( I have large hands, hence I have battery grips on both my X-T3 camera bodies. I am heavily invested in Fuji glass, but at the present time, I will not be upgrading to the X-H2 or X-H2S. I am interested to see if if Fuji can finally get Continuous Auto Focus on the same level as So ny, Canon or Nikon, as I shoot high school assignments including sporting events & candid events. I, like you, was a LONG TIME Canon shooter. I felt changing over from the EF lenses to the RF glass had become cost prohibitive for me.
I agree with everything you said. But I still love the dials. I even see the PASM point you make, and particularly with the custom modes… but I love the old dials, it’s how I learnt I think is the problem, back on film.
Hey Booray, I've now watched this video twice since I'm considering switching to mirrorless with Fuji and the points you make of what's valuable to you are similar to what I value. However, in your video you mention you can't add a battery grip to the XT-5, which would improve the grip. You didn't mention whether or not you can add a 3rd party grip like you did for your XT-4. The ergonomic feature is very important to me since my D500 has an excellent grip like the XH2. Thoughts?
Hi Booray. I was wondering if you have been able to resolve the issue with your X-H2 locking up & changing your ISO settings. Just curious as I like to see what the answer is to this problem. I know this seems to be a random occurrence for your specific use.
Fantastic video, thank you very much! Please, bear with me due I am very new at these matters. Does the H2 works OK without the second extra card or, it must be with the 2 cards inside to be able to function? That has not been clear for me, if someone can answer, thanks in advance! Many greetings from Germany!
Thanks Booray. You've made my mind up for me. I was leaning hard towards the X-T5 because of the old-school design but the practicality of the PASM dial and the custom settings makes more sense. I'm sold! Now I just have to convince the boss. ;)
Ill wait for the xh3 -fuji hopefully have sorted their focus out by then -I need it for bird and animal photography . Yes the PASM is a better way to work -I 4 have the XT4 and believe function over form
im tempted with the XT5 but lower rez EVF and also smaller EVF puts me off. on my trial with the XH" iso worked well on the top and bottom of the 4 buttons on back, set iso to both then if want to lower the iso press bottom and if want to go up press up, only work around at present and is far quicker than contorting the trigger finger to the ISO button on top. Loved the XH2 and XH2s but loath the flippy screen
I have large hands and I have never used anything other than my xt30ii and while I like the command dials and the fact that they click, they are too small for me its not comfortable to use and I constantly accidently press when just wanting to turn. So I am personally okay with the clicks being gone but like I said I only ever used xt30ii so I don't know if these dials are bigger or not on other cameras and I would assume if it were larger than I might not have issue with accidental click in which case I would still prefer the clicks be there. I am looking to upgrade and the xt5 and xh2 are top of my considerations however it seems the xt50 may come out semi soon and I think I might hold out and see what that offers but I gotta say xh2 is looking better an better to me, definitely the winner for comfort and handling
Spending $200 more on top of purchasing new cards for the X-H2 was the deal breaker for me. I upgraded from X-T3 to the X-T5. Familiar dials, ergonomics. I get the same sensor, ibis and save a few hundreds of dollars.
About the hassle of having two types of memory cards. Video obviously benefits from the faster CF Express card, but also burst mode taking stills, for what I've read, the X-T5 can only shoot about 20 uncompressed RAW shots in 15 FPS burst mode before overflowing the buffer (which takes a while to clear), whereas the X-H2 can manage well over a hundred of those and, essentially, infinite JPEGs. This modest figures in the X-T5 seem to improve dramatically if you shoot JPEG, allowing for well over a hundred shots before filling the buffer. Not a big deal if you keep your drive mode in single shot most of the time, but a deal breaker if you're an action or wildlife photographer and want to shoot RAW. This in one of the main reasons, apart from ergonomics, I'm going to order the X-H2 instead of the X-T5.
Great discussion. I was planning on buying an X-T5 but now I'm back on the fence. I really wanted a battery grip but that's probably not going to be an option going forward with the X-T* line. I think I may wait a year or so and pick up a used one or save my money and see what Fuji releases in the future.
I like to shoot my 100-400 handheld for bird / wildlife photography (tried using tripod, gimbal, etc.) I have an x-t3 and it's a rough combination to hold. I don't have large hands but I end up keeping my L-bracket on the body for more area to hold onto. I've been going back and forth on the XH-2 but I'm not a fan of that flippy screen. Decisions. Decisions. Very informative video. Thank you. (Never have used the video function on my x-t3!)
I love your style. Thank You very much. I thought about buying an X-T5, and afterwards heard of the X-H2. You sum up all the important points for me. I would choose the X-T5, because i don't care about video, and i think, i have to lern how to use the gear, instead of the gear has to adopt to my inability. But, in the end, i sty with canon, and try to get a R7. It's not that easy in Austria right now, but just it fits me the best. I hit the subscribe button and shared this video on mastodon. Looking foreward to your comming videos. But not only for gear. I have to learn much more.
Long time Canon user here but sorely tempted by all things fuji. I enjoyed your video on the x100v and why someone should or shouldn’t get it, and enjoyed this one between these two cameras. I’ll probably end up with an older model fuji for home family snaps. What I really want is those Fuji film emulations. Keep up the great work 🤗
You're absolutely right about the shutter button! this is why I always loved Canon's ergo's.......the XH1/2 thinly fujis that feel nice in the hand....and I have the XT4.
As a X-T1, X-T3, and X-H2 owner, the ergonomic change is HUGE. I shoot several multi day events a year, the fact I don't end up with hand cramps after the first hour or two is such a relief. I can say the PASM dial is... meh, take it or leave it, I am still much faster at adjustments on the X-T3, but I've been shooting the XT style camera since the X-T1 was released [near eight or nine years of muscle memory]. The Sub dials on the X-T cameras are not great, they click over to easily in my opinion, especially when you're adjusting without looking. I'll stick with the X-H2, I'll get used to the PASM, and the flip out screen is slowly growing on me for certain situations, especially for shooting extremely awkward angles off a tripod.... Imagine my delight when I realized I didn't have to wade out into a freezing creek bed for a waterfall shot I did recently [Really though three feet deep and six feet wide, placing the tripod from shore was a treat].... I may yet buy an X-T5, but it would be in addition to the X-H2, just a backup in the moment.
Hi mate, I have been an XT shooter for the past 7 years owning the xt1 then upgrading to an xt2 almost within a year, it's been good enough for me. Just as you say handling heavier zoom glass (particularly my 100-400) the xh2 will be my upgrade and not the xt5 due to so many reasons. I'll miss the 'on the fly' adjustments via the dials but all day comfort and more confidence handling one handed it's an easy transition for me.
@@davidfromdownunder I shot an event shortly after getting my X-H2, and felt far more at ease with the camera than I would of imagined. Yeah, the top dials on the XT cameras are incredible, and I would rather use those for my adjustments, but I can cope for the comfort alone.
A lot of info on the bodies and features. How about AF, image quality, and jpeg colors? I got the XT5. Skipped the XT4. Moved up for the IBIS and sensor changes. I’ve always been about the quality and size of the kit. I appreciate the “downsizing”. I didn’t want to keep being “bumped” up in size and weight! Thanks Booray!
I have an XT3 and XT4, and love them. I got a chance to shoot an XH2 for a couple of outings. I loved the feel of the H2 and I really liked the EVF. I'm a landscape photo guy and since I use an L-bracket, I'm happy the remote release port is back on the right side like the XT3. I'll be saving for the XH2. Thanks for the video!
Nice video Buddy, I just got the xt5,really enjoying it. For the ergonomics. I got a L grip and that did the Job.Also for the dials the front one I used for SS and the one in the back i use it for ISO and control the aperture on the lens.
Okay, so I have a bunch of Fuji’s. I have rarely used my X100V, it’s just not the right focal length in reality for my photography. Sooo, thinking about it selling it and getting either the XH2 or XT5. It’s tough because I do like the dials and retro look. However, the XH2 EVF and grip and better weather-sealing may just swing it. I do have an XT3, so if I keep that, then maybe I have the best of both. Decisions decisions.
I just bought a silver XT5 and it looks awesome with the retro design. But the moment I held a XH2 in my hands, it was a big difference. The XH2 just felt so comfortable and natural in the hands. Thinking of trading my XT5 for the XH2 just for ergonomics lol
I think the main difference can be boiled down to the X-T5 is a stills camera and the X-H2 is a hybrid....that is why they brought back that marvellous stills centric 3 way flip screen, only SD cards - CF Express not needed for stills - (unless all you do is constant burst shots) So, if you are a still shooter the X-T5 is a dream come true!! Tbe X-H2 and 2s are for hybrid and video user in the main
I feel that way too except there are things they left off the X-T5 that are good for stills as well, especially event shooters. For example, sports shooters want a battery grip. Nature shooters might like to be able to flip and close the screen for protection (and it's better sealed). If they really wanted to make the X-T5 a stills camera they would have dropped the vide all together and added a built in ND filter. :)
@@BoorayPerry Agree with most of that....but they can't please all of the people unfortunately. I love my X-T5 so far (I have never shot video and don't intend to!!) Thanks for the comparison, good for folks still trying to make up their mind
The X-T5 still shoots brilliant video although I agree it seems more aimed at stills photography. I sold my X-T4 and bought the 5 as I found myself really disliking the flip out screen. The 5 is much better suited to my needs as I don’t shoot much video or do blogging. Even though it’s slightly smaller than the 4 I find it more comfortable to hold, even for my large hands
Great video, but there are some mistakes in this video. The viewfinder of the X-T5 is also 0.8x magnification (not 0.75x as mentioned in the video). The screen resolution of the X-T5 is 1.84 million dots and the X-H2 has 1.62 million dots (it was backwards in the video)
Theoretically as big as you want. The files are 7728 on the long side. Most printers recommend a 300DPI image min. So, 7728/300 = 25. 25 inches on the long side. However, that's not taking into account "perceived size." If you stood a comfortable viewing distance from the 25 inch print, then you printed it at 50 inches and stood the same distance, it might not look good because it is 150DPI. BUT you wouldn't stand the same distance, you would back up which would make the image shrink in your vision to something closer to the 25 inch print... making it 300DPI in your vision. This is how billboards work. They are not printed at 300DPI because no camera can shoot that image. Add to this the ability to upscale an image and the sky is the limit.
I know I'm here late, but the grip, illuminated top screen, vertical grip availability, and PASM dial made the x-h2 a no brainer. Especially as a photojournalist
I went with xt5 because I liked my xt2 and xt3 so I changed for the larger sensor did not have to relearn how to operate. I went thru that pain when when I switched from Nikon DSLR (800e,7200) for less weight before Nikon had mirrorless. I agree ergonomics of the H2 would be better when I use my 100-400 but not a biggie for me. So far happy with xt5 and will probably get a another one for I like the same camera for my backup too.
Excellent points but by your Logic and mine would the XH-2S not be even better ? The sensor is better, the AF is up there with the Big boys and superb speed 40 FPS and higher DR Dynamic Range again for a few hundred Quid more… 🙂
Thanks for a great video. Would you say that both of these would be a step up from the new Sony a6700? I have the a6400 and I really like the xh2, though I am concerned that it may be a bit bulky compared to the smaller form factor of the a6700. Thanks
➡Instagram - instagram.com/boorayperry/
➡Podcast - photobomb.buzzsprout.com/
➡Gear - boorayperry.com/boorays-gear/
➡Booray Explains - tinyurl.com/3e7w8zjt
CORRECTION: The X-T5 has 1,840,000 screen dots. The X-H2 has 1,620,000. Why they would give the X-T5 better screen resolution is beyond me.
I bought the X T-5 because I have experience with the X T-1 and X-T-2 so I feel more confident with the X T-5. However my Corel Aftershot software won't recognize the raw X T-5 files. I'll be happy when Corel produces a version compatible with the X T-5! Pax Vobiscum
A very good video and thorough analysis. You missed two things about the X-T5 though. One, it is 4-1/2 oz lighter than the X-H2 and second is that the screen is a three-way tilt not just two-way. I tried both of these cameras and chose the X-T5, the noticeable lighter weight and size being one of my deciding considerations. Another deciding factor was the $200 extra body cost plus another $200 -to $300 for new memory cards that cannot be used in any of my other cameras. The side tilt option on the screen is very good for low shots with the camera in vertical orientation and also candid sideways shots in horizontal positions which I like but was not a deciding factor. I have been making photos for 75 years (yes, since 1948) and I prefer dials, and since I wear trifocals I can glance at them easily and I do not care for the little display screen on top of the X-H2.. I use only prime lens and I can count clicks on the aperture ring from my preferred setting without looking and often I use a fully manual lens. I have never shot videos nor do I intend to. The same goes for selfies. And I only shoot RAW so 90% of either of these two cameras (and other digitals) is a waste of space and money for me. Overall the X-T5 is the one that best fits my own needs, and I appreciate your detailed analysis of the two as it convinces me that I made the right choice for my style. I just recently happened onto your channel, and it is so refreshing to hear from a real photographer as opposed to the predominantly adolescent reviewers whom I turn off as soon as I hear the word "awesome".
Thankyou for this❤
I will have to rent both bodies to evaluate the ergonomics. I personally prefer the PSAM format and I’ve been shooting,
(developing too ) since ‘64. I like keeping m6 eye in the viewfinder and PSAM , the XH2 would allow 30:04 me to do just that. Certainly can learn the XT 5 with John Peltier videos. The weight and size are extremely important so renting will help me select the right camera for me. I also shot with a Sony RX100M7 a true pocket camera with 20+ mp and a great back up.
By far the best comparison between these 2 cameras. You just nail the reasons for the choice. Both cameras are superb but the ergonomics and the other features for the relatively small increase in cost has sold me on the H2. Your manner in distilling the points into practical points is outstanding. Many thanks for assisting me with the choice. I have the Xt2 which I have used for many years and will keep this for a light weight compact camera for street and travel and use the H2 for more studio work and using large lenses. Well done again. I am so happy I found your channel.
Thank you for taking the time to write such a thoughtful and gracious comment! :)
This was hands down the most helpful video I’ve seen, thank you so much! I’ve been agonizing for the past several days wondering what I should get to upgrade my x-t1, and while I’m a value oriented guy and recognized the value and understood I don’t need the video, I just couldn’t let go of the dials of the xt line until you explained the ease of the pasm and the pistol grip. Makes so much sense! I also love being able to protect my screen as well. You’ve got a subscriber in me and I look forward to all your future vidoes!
That's great to hear I'm glad I could help! Thanks for the sub 🙂📷
I almost went X-H2, but glad I finally went with the X-T5 to replace my X-T3. I'm a stills photographer and that screen on the X-T5 was my kicker along with the classic look.
The screen!! The only reason I didn’t go xh2. All my twin reflex shooting made me a waist shooter and the fully articulated screen blacks in and out in landscape waist shooting …. (Street portraits)
Just discovered your channel. What a great, informative video. Thank you.
Thanks for watching!
I've been using an X-T4 with Fuji long glass as my "lightweight" kit for avian photography. I have to admit my preferred cameras have been a pair of Nikon D500s for one big reason... these Nikons were really designed for sports and nature and have HUGE buffers. Plus the RAW files are gorgeous and easy to work with. But there is something magical about Fuji colors. Anyway, I was set to grab an X-T5 (my X-T4 is on eBay) when I learned it still had the tiny buffer of the X-T4. I don't sit on the shutter typically; I shoot in (hopefully)well timed bursts to capture peak action. But occasionally I ran into some bald eagle aerial battles where the action was hot and heavy and I found myself holding the shutter down much longer than usual. My Nikons can fire off about 240 RAW files before the buffer fills and starts to slow down. My X-T4 pooped out several times one day while shooting some heavy eagle action. Exasperating and I switched back to the Nikons that day. Since the X-H2 has a MUCH bigger buffer, that is a major plus. The Nikon D500s also use the Compact Flash cards anyway and I have a lot of them. As much as I love the X-T4 aesthetics (my first camera was a Nikkormat film camera), looks don't make images. I also have a Nikon Z7II which is more in line aesthetically (and functionally) with the X-H2. And I love it at work where we do event photography. But I think the X-H2 with the Fuji 100-400 and my new Fuji 150-600 should be just fine. Still keeping the D500s (both have shutter replacements done at about 2 million activations, well past their stated useful life). Old habits die hard. I have lots of Fuji glass and am really looking forward to the X-H2!
I watched this thinking I was a XH2 candidate. Left thinking I like my XT4/X100V combo more than ever. Thanks for the in depth opinions.
You're welcome! Thanks for watching! 📷😁
I went for the X-H2 essentially for the better grip and better viewfinder. The X-T5 grip is fine only if you use small primes but forget handling big zooms or high end Fuji primes for a whole day with it. Admittedly, the PSAM is a better way to manage a camera and the customs settings are finally much more convenient than I thought. Yes I love the retro look of the X-T5 but if you look for higher efficiency, the X-H2 is the way to go. The perfect combination would be an X-H2 + an X100V for lighter / more discreet shooting sessions
Excellent comparison and I''m with you, X-H2.
I like consistency. I like to work with either PASM or dials. The idea of going back and forth between the wheels and top dials to set the aperture or shutter speed to me defeats the purpose of simplifying things which is what I loved about film cameras in the 80s. They had the triangle plus compensation on the top dials and the aperture on the lens and that was it.
I was hoping I work with dials all the time, which intuitively seems the way to go. Upon thinking about this and finding this video, I have come to the realization that the X-H2 would work better for me simply because if I had to remember every time which combination of dial settings I need to set to be in a particular shooting mode, that would drive me insane. Also, the idea of working sometimes with old style dials and sometimes with a wheel to set the shutter speeds is definitely a deal breaker for me.
Again, I don’t like hidden stuff but if the camera has quick-access and coherent combination of buttons for adjusting/checking the iso, aperture, shutter speed, and exposure compensation, then that’s a winner to me. Secondary buttons to me are white balance, autofocus and shutter modes. If those are also easily accessible through a shift-second-button combo, then everything else can be shifted to menus. The nice thing is that white balance is already a dedicated and quick-access button on the X-H2.
So, with the X-H2 you get the triangle on the wheels and the iso and white balance through quick access buttons, what more do you want? That is 90% of what I use.
At one point size mattered to me but after holding both, that became a moot point for me. Someone looking from the other size of the lens won’t notice the size difference. The H2 does feel a little heavier but will probably feel more balance with larger lenses. The location of the stick and the number of customization buttons are a great bonus in the H2, but then you add the larger buffer, and this makes my choice easier.
Video is secondary to me; either camera would have worked fine for me in this area. I do think for strictly photography, the LCD tilt style on the X-T5 is better. For videographers, not so much.
I am sure other folks will like the X-T5. I love the look of this camera 100%, but in the end, I’ll go with the boring yet practical camera for me. I know myself. Thanks to Fuji for giving us options.
Dear Perry,
The CF-EXPRESS TYPE B, card is important because it provide a few hundreds of buffers when you shoot still in XH2, while XT-5 DO NOT !!!
Everywhere I check the difference is $300, not $200. But, I still agree that the X-H2 is a better value. However, even with big hands, I went for the X-T5. I am not a professional, but a hobbyist. I never shoot video. I love the retro SLR look and feel in use of the X-T5. It has a better grip than either my X-T1 or X-T3. The X-H2 would not make me want to pick it up and shoot. I find it easy to make quick on the fly changes with the dials on the X-T series.. The X-T5 is my X100v.
you can set video on preset as well. only one klick to change from photo to video. I am using the X-H2 mostly for 8K video. CF Express is unfortunately needed for 8K video. Currently I am wondering about the battery grip price.
Good points, some apply and some don’t to my usage scenario, but I had not considered before, like the PASM difference and joystick. Big differences. Thanks 👍🏼
Welcome!
I have a question…as a Leica Q2 owner, if i made the switch to the H2, would i disappointed?
31:56
That's hard to say because those two cameras are designed for different purposes. If you want a camera that you can carry with you everyday then I would stay with the Leica. If you want a camera for professional work then I would switch to the Fuji.
The dial click on the XH is one thing I would miss. Happy with PASM as I recently bought an XS20
I love my X-H2, but for a fun cam I ordered the X-T50, the film sim dial sounds like the bomb for fun shooting in jpg.
Very insightful and honest analysis.
Thank you. :)
Thanks for a really helpful video! I think if I were shopping for one of these two as my primary working camera, I'd be right there with you at the X-H2; but I'm actually looking for something my wife might occasionally be willing to tote and use for light duty to get better photos than a phone, and the X-T5's smaller size and slightly lighter weight work in its favor - and it's nice to look at, which ain't nothing.
I like that both of these seem to use the same batteries as the GFX cameras, since I've already got a couple of those chargers around the house, and my use of the GFX 100 II has sold me on how close to a usable photo right out of the camera I can get using one of the Fuji film looks (a feature set which seemed nothing but silly until I actually used them, having found out that they're also available for raw files processed in Lightroom)!
...and to correct just one thing in your video: the X-H2 obviously isn't Fuji's best camera, that's the GFX series and in particular the GFX 100 II now. I'm absolutely gobsmacked by the quality I'm getting out of that damned thing, even in low natural light. But it's huge and heavy and expensive, as are the lenses. But don't try one unless you want to risk buying one! The 55/1.7 is an addictive choice of glass to go with it, or the 110 if you're a short tele person.
I’m with you on the XH2 for the ergonomics!
Thank you, very helpful. I would also have preferred two UHS ii cards slots, but have bought the XH2 for stills photography. I'm over 60 now and the better grip, top screen, PASM and improved weather sealing make the XH2 the right choice, (for me). Thank you for this excellent comparison.
Thank you for taking the time to watch. :)
My primary reason for preferring the X-T5 LCD screen function is for landscape photography where I need an L bracket. The screen in the X-T4 and the X-H models does not play well with an L bracket.
I recently received my X-T5 and am quite happy with it. I am happy to see that Fuji seems to be different in lines a bit where X-H is truly hybrid (PASM + Vari angle screen) and X-T is primarily photographic in focus with exposure dials and 3-way flip. They had a few years where they were trying to find themselves with models and it seems they have figured it out. I am really loving my X-T5 (with MHG-XT5) as it pretty much is perfect for me. No real complaints. I did try out an X-H2s for a week rental, and did find it to work quite well, but I just can’t stand the vari-angle screen for my shooting style…I would rip it off eventually as it would get tangled in the strap and the PASM dial just isn’t something I like. Again, so happy we seem to have a clear-er differentiation in lines and chooses in the Fuji lineup.
You can pick up aftermarket L Grips for the X-T5 to improve ergonomics, the Fuji one is a ridiculous price but there are much cheaper options, smallrig one for example.
Appreciate the comments…. I’m not a professional photographer and don’t mind taking the time to turn dials. After trying one of the older X-T cameras, I love the dials and the smaller form and weight. I just sold my Canon R and ordered the X-T5.
Which one (including the -X-H2S) has the fastest AF specifically birds in flight? I'm using an X-T2, and the 100-400, and it's better than I thought, but I knew I would upgrade at some point.
I don't know I haven't been able to test them but I feel like I heard somewhere that the s is a little better. I could be wrong
Loved your video! Wish I'd found this video before I bought my camera... It would have made the decision a whole lot easier. I spent a long time agonizing over the choice between the XT5, the H2, and the H2S. Ultimately I went with the H2 and everything you said in your review confirmed that I did make the correct decision. I've been shooting an XT4 for 4 years now. I shoot professionally, I also do quite a bit of video but nothing fancy just basic talking head stuff.
I am super happy with the H2. Lots of people claim there's not much of a difference between 40 megapixels and 24 megapixels but I disagree. I was blown away by the image quality, totally happy.
I was thinking that I should probably plan on getting an H2S to compliment the H2, but now that I've been playing with the video on the H2 I don't really feel the need for the H2S, at least not for what I do. The H2 video is just fine.
I also was not too fond of the idea of the compact flash, but the reality is the CF is faster and that's why they chose it. If you want the high performance results you've got to have the hardware to support it.
I have pretty big hands, the ergonomics of the H2 suit me just fine. I think it is more comfortable to hold than my XT4. I like that big bulge it gives me a solid grip on the camera.
This is the first video of yours that I've seen, you did such a great job with it I guess I better subscribe. Have a great day!
Thanks a lot! I'm happy with mine as well although I'm about to send it in for repair because the hotshoe is loose
@@BoorayPerry something I don't remember you mentioning in your review is the improvement in the low light sensitivity. I often shoot in "available darkness" and I'm usually operating close to the edge of what's feasible. So far what I'm finding is that the light sensitivity of the H2 is about twice that of the XT4. I don't know how they are pulling this off... Double the resolution and double the light sensitivity! That's not even supposed to be possible. But they did it.
Great video and I agree with you. I bought both and am using both for now, but I think I might keep the X-H2. It feels better in my hand, a better grip, the EVF is so much better than that of the X-T5. I love the new 56mm 1.2 lens, but it just looks a little too big on the X-T5 body. Close call, but the X-H2 probably the better camera for me.
Thanks for your video! However, I need to disagree on the "memory cards" part. I don't shoot video either, but I do like to shoot burst mode of action (wildlife, sports). The CF express card allows you for continuous burst, without filling the camera's internal buffer.
I love the old school feel of the X-T line but also the physical handling (and IBIS) of my X-H1. Trading my X-H1 now for an H2 but keeping my old X-T3 so the best of both worlds. Thanks for your walk through of both models. It’s worth pointing out that the PASM dial is a marked change to even the original H model.
I was going to get the X-T5, but for all the reasons you said I got the X-H2 . Sold my X-T3. Found that I love the PSAM dial.
Didn't think I'd stay for the full video, but great no-nonsense discussion. Having used cameras with similar ergonomics as the X-T5 I know how much that can affect your photography and highlighted how much of a factor that is in choosing between the H2 and T5, my next decision is between the H2 and the H2s.
Staying for the video is a great compliment, thanks. :)
For me (having an X-T4) , the only truly compelling reason I'd like the X-H2 is for the sensor.
I really feel they shortchanged the X-T5; especially the flip-screen, a real deal breaker.
But for now, I'll stay with my X-t4 since you rarely (IMO) need the difference between 26 and 40 MP.
Great video; really a good insight to what matters!
I also kept my XT4 over the XT5. I feel like the build quality is a downgrade and you're not getting your money's worth to justify the price difference between the XT4 and XT5 however I really wanted the 40mp because I like to crop in sometimes and recompose and opted for the XH2 to accompany my XT4. I feel it's worthy of the price difference because of the better ergonomics and weather sealing and the EVF.
@@michamilka you know, you make a very good point about the X-T4 build quality. When I first got my X-T4, I was amazed at just how classic and expensive feeling it was. To this day, every time I pick it up (I have the silver version), it reminds me of the really nice cameras of the past that used film. This may sound funny, but I really feel that when a device that impresses you with its feel, lends itself to you doing better and more serious/precise work because you’re inspired to be using such a fine instrument. I also, do-not like how they changed the ergonomics of the X-T5; I feel that Fuji took a step backwards on this.
I have never seen an X-H2 in the flesh, so we’ll have to check it out. I too, do a lot of cropping and yes, 40+ megapixel would be better for sure. But I’ve decided to just be more mindful of what I think I would likely have the cropping to be. So even if I get a bigger sensor in the future, I will certainly keep my X-T4. And even though some people feel it excessive, sometimes it’s better to just buy an additional item, even if it’s more expensive and keep your original one. Too often, I’ve been most-regretful of getting rid of something I was fond of, just because I thought I should sacrifice one for the other.
Thanks for bringing this up, because I was a little bit timid to mention it! 😉
Mr. Booray Perry,
What a great and thoroughly enjoyable video!
I am considering each camera and your presentation was really, really helpful.
Thank you, thank you, thank you!
Best regards always. James McC., Philadelphia
Thank you for a wonderful comment. :)
I like the XT5, I am a Nikon shooter and the weight of my Nikon D850 is a chore and a task...even after I take the battery grip off😱
For Me that XT5 is a dream come true...I can carry that all day long and not complain....
I was using three XT4 bodies for weddings. I now replaced two of them with XT5s. I’m liking the cameras, but find the RAW files are a lot more contrasty and more prone to magnenta. Did you notice that or with the XH2?
I did not but then I like contrast so... 🙂
@@BoorayPerry I do to, especially after decades of shooting film, but I find the Xt4 files easier to get my desired result. Next time you get a chance, see if you can see the difference between the two. It’s not a problem, but it does add another layer of work when trying to match them in Lightroom…
Thanks for this video. I do almost exclusively photography and was excited about the XT5 until I found out that it is the first XT camera not to offer a vertical grip (battery grip). The extra battery is nice but I have used the grips more for the vertical trigger shooting portraits and I like the switch to go from normal to boost mode. I got lucky with a recent sale and was able to pick up the XH2 with a free Fuji battery grip for only $150 more than the XT5. I also have large hands and so I actually spent the same amount of money as getting the XT5 with its Fuji grip, which, of course doesn’t give you extra power or a vertical trigger. Plus I also use the viewfinder much more than the back of the camera and the extra resolution is also wonderful.
And right now you can get the Fuji grip by itself on sale for half price for $199. at B&H and other retailers. Honestly, once you have tried a grip with a vertical trigger for portraits, it’s just awkward not to use it.
Glad I could help. :)
Thanks Booray for an interesting comparison. I shoot 4 minutes long exposure and need sensor/processing cooling. Some years ago I went from X-T2 to X-H1 only because of better cooling. How would the X-T5 handle heat with an even bigger sensor and faster processor than the old X-T2 (which cuased major issues for me with hot pixels)? Inputs, pls
I have no experience with this style of shooting so I have nothing to add but let me know whet you find out. :)
Boo, thanks for the video. Do find the older fuji lenses which were considered good glass on the 26 MP sensors, to be lacking in anyway on the 40 MP?
I haven't experienced that at all. I can't tell a difference between the XT5 and XH2.
Here in Lima Fujifilm has them both on sale, and curiously they end up both at the same price with the n16-80mm f4. Actually , the XH2 was 50$ less !! so that closed the deal. I bought the XH2 :)
For the same reasons you mention, the Xh2 is also my go-to camera (my big hands, ergonomics, and weather sealing, especially important when you live far into the arctic circle) I don't own one yet, tho.
My question is related to the problem some XH2 owners have highlighted and that is "freezing"... that sometimes the camera is freezing during operation and the only way to bring it back to life again is to take the battery out and in again. For me who makes a lots of time-lapses that would be a huge problem and that makes me hesitant to buy XH2, although I'v already bought some Fuji.lenses.
Have you heard about this freezing issue, or have you had this problem with you own XH2?
Thanks!🙏
I had this problem and made a video about it. Shortly after that, Fuji released a firmware update that fixed it. :)
Amazing review, thank you
Hi Booray, I'm a photography enthusiast & I have the X-T4 & the X-H2 as well. I've got to say what you describe in your video about the ease of use of the handgrip, PSAM dials, EVF Flip around screen + etc is so so true . I was hestitating to get X-H2 & X-T5 in the begining as well. But now, I'm glad to say I know I've made the right choice especially when I'm shooting with both cameras (on a Holdfast MM Bridle Leather) each with a XF Fuji prime lens at a wedding event recently. The whole experience on the X-H2 was so much more better plus the ease of use & speed totally as you've descibe in your video. Another thing I would like to add is, the buttons, the joystick & the whole feel to the camera in general does somehow feels much more premium. Thanks for making this video Booray. Cheers ;)
Thanks for watching! I know that I am in the minority on this. Fuji fans love the dials and I get it I really do. I love them too and if I was just a hobbyist I would use the X-T5 (or maybe if I just shot smaller primes) but once the big zoom goes on the camera I want the X-H2. I also think that the people who love the dials tend to be people who don't change there setting as often as I do and maybe don't require reading glasses to read them :)
When you said, take the video out that blew my mind, because that is what I have been posting on many forums and the Fuji film Facebook page make a camera with no video whatsoever. Everyone who wants a great camera will flock to that camera.
I am a new subscriber to this channel and current Sony aps-c user for years (2014).
I don’t want to go full frame, I take photos for my personal enjoyment, family, travel, church events.
I take a lot of photos of planes at museums and boats at boat shows. I am invested in a bigger printer at home.
Would 40mp give me more definition, detail then my current 24mp?
I use sigma glass (trifecta).
I don’t mind switching to Fuji, especially knowing I can get basically all the same glass.
I would like to make this decision before purchasing that viltrox 75mm.
Fuji's 24 megapixel sensor is a great sensor and I used it for years. For me, the greatest benefit of the 40 megapixel sensor is the ability to crop more. This isn't something that most photographers need.
Very interesting video Booray. I like how you personalized it. Just returned my X-H2 today...the LCD was blacking out occasionally, which was irritating and couldn't figure out why. Getting a replacement X-H2 anyway...like the feel and the 40 mp.
Thanks!
Very thourough comparison....but I'm still not convinced the X-H2 is the best choice for me. I have 3 X-H1 bodies and really like them for studio video work where they remain set up all the time. I'm now looking for a body for mostly photography and like shooting with an L-Bracket. This seems like it could be cumbersome with the flip-out screen. Any thoughts?
I actually have a full cage on my XH2 and it hasn't been a problem.
Than you for this comparison. I recently bought into the Fuji System (XT5) and have purchased a lot of glass for it. It was meant to be second camera to my work camera, a Sony A7R5, which I also have a lot $$ invested in glass. I love both systems for very different reasons. There's just something about those Fuji images though! It has taken time to get used to the cool dials and yes, I love the way it looks and performs. I would like to use it has my second camera for an upcoming wedding, but you're so right about the dials slowing you down. I have been afraid to take the chance of getting myself all confused. I'm not ready to come out of the Sony world and this video really helped me to realize that if I trade up to H-H2, bouncing between the cameras will be a whole lot less complicated with the PASM dial. I can even set up both cameras very simliar. Wish me luck! lol
Good luck! :)
This is a great review. I like the xt5 and the xh2, but I'm a serious amateur and really don't need 40mp. I'm thinking about the xs20 - I just wish it was weather sealed. (Also wish it had the d-pad).
Do you have any experience with the OM1 or OM5? I like many features about Fugi better (aperture on lense) but the OM are famous for weather sealing and image stabilization.
Thanks for your great reviews.
I have no experience at all with the OM system. I've always been very interested in it however. I know a lot of wildlife photographers who use it.
Is it possible to download and backup the C1-C7 presets into computer?
That's a great question. I don't think it is but it would be nice if you could transfer those presets to another camera, right?
@@BoorayPerry I was wondering if i had edited this presets in computer with 1/6 step EV values for exposure bracketing and then export this edited presets back to camera, if this shutter speeds would work? Probably not. Sometimes the camera interface is limited displaying 1/3 stops, but it can take any number and round to closest working shutter speed.
What I need to know, is are ALL the lenses interchangeable between the XT5 and XH2?
Yes. One of the great things about Fuji is that they only have two lines of cameras. The x line which is APS-C and the g line which is medium format.
@@BoorayPerry Thank you!
I'm seriously considering upgrading my X-T3 gripped bodies and am leaning hard towards the X-H2. I'm pretty sure it won't take that long to get used to the more (Canon'ish) top layout after using those cameras for years previously. Thanks for your video efforts, very informative.
Thanks!
@@BoorayPerry ordered mine today and it should be in by Friday at my local camera store ... extra battery, and Delkin CFeB and reader.
Excellent very comprehensive review. I think the X-H2 is the best choice for me!
What I like about Fujifilm is that they upgraded their cameras for a specific photographer need’s without having to break the bank. I’ve been shooting XT3 for quite sometime however I need a camera for wildlife photography especially BIF. I don’t need to spend 2 grand XH2S and change my SD cards. So we now have choices and my choice would be the XT5. Just a matter of options that I love. Happy shooting Aloha 🙏🏼
I bought an XT4 thinking Id like a hybrid but tbh haven't really done that much video. I have an x100v that gets more use but think I'll wait until I see whats in store for a new XPro before I upgrade.
Hi, I own and tested almost all Fuji models. Beside my Gfx which is another level and not compatible with other x series, I bought xt5 to have 40 mp for my photography need. As you said it is so beautiful specially the silver one, but after while I found I never use any of physical wheels! I set aperture and shutter speed as well as iso on front and back wheels with push and click to switch between. Also red batch lenses on xt5 body are not balanced but on xh body look much better. Xh1 with 26 mp was not enough for me and Gfx is very heavy and difficult for walking around, and again I think xh2 would be good replace on my Gfx with bulky lenses, specially for my age in 60! So eventually I am planning to set xh2 with 3 red batch lenses + versatile camera (hopefully new x1006). What do you think?
I think you are doing exactly what I did. :)
@@BoorayPerry really?1 I am happy that i came to this right final decision after years of buying and testing and selling! Now with your words I’m more confident to do this. Only 2 issues are on my way: 1. Shall I gain same deep image result by crop sensor 40mp vs medium format 102 mp of gfx100s? And 2: how can I sell my gfx100s body and few gf lenses?
@@mrz1342 Well I can't help you with the GFX stuff. :)
@@BoorayPerry what about my first question for image quality by xh2 vs gfx100s?
I've never used a gfx...
As a woman with small hands, I do love the ergonomics of the xt4, I can hold it a very long time :) So, I am glad that there are options for smaller hands, as well as bigger hands :)
Nice video, thanks :)
I already have a XT5, loving it, but i want a second camera for my professional shoots (documentary style). So a second camera for having a back up, but not only. Also for having one prime on each body (as I don’t like zoom), carrying both cameras with a double strap.
First I was going for another XT5. Same ergonomics, same tactile memories for using both, it seems the natural way to go. However, the XH2 could be a good choice too, especially in order to use bigger lenses on it (potentially a 50-140. The 18mm will be mainly sticked to the XT5, and longer focals lengths on my future second body, XT or XH) but I know there is a good grip available for the XT5 (even if it’s not a battery grip). I’m also afraid that I could get confused in the different ergonomics with one XT5 in my left hand and one XH2 in my right 😅 but I probably could get used to it as you do with the non-clickable wheels. I don’t do video neither BUT it’s an option in the future so having the XH2 specs could be a good thing indeed.
Any thoughts on that? Do you shoot with one body only?
Thanks :)
I shoot with one body but back when I shot with two I used the same bodies for exactly the reasons you mentioned. :)
@@BoorayPerry yes that's certainly the reason why I'll probably go with a second XT5 to accompany my first one :D thanks ^^
i use a xt3 and a x100v , have 10-24, 1655 and 50-140 with the tlc.... i shoot mostly dog sports ...how much would the xh2 an upgrade for this u think ? Couild trade some of my stuff i dont realy need for it . Thanks !
I don't know the X-T3 well but I don't think it has IBIS. Also, the auto focus on the X-H2 will be much better and it's 40mp. It's a considerable upgrade I think but do you really need it? That's the question. :)
@@BoorayPerry Thy 4 the qick answer, yes i think i need it =)
This is just personal preference, but does the X-h2 come in silver?
If it does, I've never seen it.
Great video!!! Thanks. Have you tried low light situations with either of these? I am very interested in how this new sensor performs in low light with fast (er) Fuji glass Thanks again.
I find the X-H2 to be just as good as the X-T4 in low light. I shoot at 3600 all the time and will go to 6400 if the situation demands it.
I have both cameras why ,why not, they are both very good camera, the biggest difference is not what is in the body but the body itself. So I use the XH2 for larger glass, I don't shoot video, I'm a stills photogrpher.and I photograph a bunch of different subjects some require larger lens like the 100-400 mm Fujifilm lens, it just works better on the XH2, the XT5 and other Xt bodys is just fun camera to use.
Great timing to find this video! I bought the xHS2 and want to get a 2nd. Moving from SONY A7S3 and A7R4. Was set on buying XT5 until this video. Now XH2 instead. 40 mpx / PASM / CF X / 8k ( for Special video moments) and screen! Sold . Thanks. Really well scripted
Thanks for the comment! :)
Fujifilm is about to announce another product shortly, could be Xpro4 or x-e5 maybe, will hold off my decision for a while.
It will be interesting to see what happens with the X-pro 4. (Hopefully a different LCD).
How do you like the erganomics of the X-pro 3 vs the Xh-2? I got to hold a Xh-2s yesterday and thought it felt a bit "thick". It did feel better, however, than the OM-1. I'm strongly leaning towards the Xh-2.
I like the Sony a7iv but to get a lense with an aperture ring you have to buy g - master glass which is very expensive.
i can't use the x-pro cameras. they just don't have anything you can grip. :)
@@BoorayPerry I really like your thoughts, mentioned in a video, about the Xh 2 with the 18-55 2.8 lense. That's a bit more expensive than "kit lense" but as a system starting point it is almost perfect and still around $2,800. I could the later add a 35mm 1.4 and these two would do 90% of what I want to do. Extremely less expensive than a Sony A7iv with equivalent g-master glass or a similar Canon system.
Hi Booray, great video. I agree with you regarding the ergonomics of the X-H2 being better than the X-T5,particularly since there is NO battery grip option for the X-T5. ( I have large hands, hence I have battery grips on both my X-T3 camera bodies. I am heavily invested in Fuji glass, but at the present time, I will not be upgrading to the X-H2 or X-H2S. I am interested to see if if Fuji can finally get Continuous Auto Focus on the same level as So ny, Canon or Nikon, as I shoot high school assignments including sporting events & candid events. I, like you, was a LONG TIME Canon shooter. I felt changing over from the EF lenses to the RF glass had become cost prohibitive for me.
Cost was it a big factor for me..
I agree with everything you said. But I still love the dials. I even see the PASM point you make, and particularly with the custom modes… but I love the old dials, it’s how I learnt I think is the problem, back on film.
Hey Booray, I've now watched this video twice since I'm considering switching to mirrorless with Fuji and the points you make of what's valuable to you are similar to what I value. However, in your video you mention you can't add a battery grip to the XT-5, which would improve the grip. You didn't mention whether or not you can add a 3rd party grip like you did for your XT-4. The ergonomic feature is very important to me since my D500 has an excellent grip like the XH2. Thoughts?
I imagine that there will be some 3rd party grips for ergonomics, even a SmallRig cage. You just can't get a battery grip 😁
@@BoorayPerry Great, thanks
How can you compare if you haven't used each camera for a good period of time????
Hi Booray. I was wondering if you have been able to resolve the issue with your X-H2 locking up & changing your ISO settings. Just curious as I like to see what the answer is to this problem. I know this seems to be a random occurrence for your specific use.
Not yet. I haven't worked a long gig yet to really test it. December is slow for my events. :)
Fantastic video, thank you very much! Please, bear with me due I am very new at these matters. Does the H2 works OK without the second extra card or, it must be with the 2 cards inside to be able to function? That has not been clear for me, if someone can answer, thanks in advance! Many greetings from Germany!
It's a setting in the camera. I don't think you have to have the 2nd card
@@BoorayPerry thank you very much
Why do they sell the x-h2 with the 16-80 lens when it's not on the list of lenses that Fujifilm recommends to use with the camera.
I traded Xt5 in for XH2.
A) My big hands
B) I wear specs and you can decrease magnification on XH2 so can see more of frame
Thanks Booray. You've made my mind up for me. I was leaning hard towards the X-T5 because of the old-school design but the practicality of the PASM dial and the custom settings makes more sense. I'm sold! Now I just have to convince the boss. ;)
Good luck. The truth is you can't go wrong with either one. :)
Ill wait for the xh3 -fuji hopefully have sorted their focus out by then -I need it for bird and animal photography . Yes the PASM is a better way to work -I 4 have the XT4 and believe function over form
im tempted with the XT5 but lower rez EVF and also smaller EVF puts me off. on my trial with the XH" iso worked well on the top and bottom of the 4 buttons on back, set iso to both then if want to lower the iso press bottom and if want to go up press up, only work around at present and is far quicker than contorting the trigger finger to the ISO button on top. Loved the XH2 and XH2s but loath the flippy screen
I have large hands and I have never used anything other than my xt30ii and while I like the command dials and the fact that they click, they are too small for me its not comfortable to use and I constantly accidently press when just wanting to turn. So I am personally okay with the clicks being gone but like I said I only ever used xt30ii so I don't know if these dials are bigger or not on other cameras and I would assume if it were larger than I might not have issue with accidental click in which case I would still prefer the clicks be there. I am looking to upgrade and the xt5 and xh2 are top of my considerations however it seems the xt50 may come out semi soon and I think I might hold out and see what that offers but I gotta say xh2 is looking better an better to me, definitely the winner for comfort and handling
Spending $200 more on top of purchasing new cards for the X-H2 was the deal breaker for me. I upgraded from X-T3 to the X-T5. Familiar dials, ergonomics. I get the same sensor, ibis and save a few hundreds of dollars.
About the hassle of having two types of memory cards. Video obviously benefits from the faster CF Express card, but also burst mode taking stills, for what I've read, the X-T5 can only shoot about 20 uncompressed RAW shots in 15 FPS burst mode before overflowing the buffer (which takes a while to clear), whereas the X-H2 can manage well over a hundred of those and, essentially, infinite JPEGs. This modest figures in the X-T5 seem to improve dramatically if you shoot JPEG, allowing for well over a hundred shots before filling the buffer. Not a big deal if you keep your drive mode in single shot most of the time, but a deal breaker if you're an action or wildlife photographer and want to shoot RAW. This in one of the main reasons, apart from ergonomics, I'm going to order the X-H2 instead of the X-T5.
Great discussion. I was planning on buying an X-T5 but now I'm back on the fence. I really wanted a battery grip but that's probably not going to be an option going forward with the X-T* line. I think I may wait a year or so and pick up a used one or save my money and see what Fuji releases in the future.
You can bet it will be at least 2 years before they release anything new in the "H" or "t" line.
I like to shoot my 100-400 handheld for bird / wildlife photography (tried using tripod, gimbal, etc.) I have an x-t3 and it's a rough combination to hold. I don't have large hands but I end up keeping my L-bracket on the body for more area to hold onto. I've been going back and forth on the XH-2 but I'm not a fan of that flippy screen. Decisions. Decisions. Very informative video. Thank you. (Never have used the video function on my x-t3!)
while shooting anything U should hold your camera with both hand at list when release the shutter >> i got the xt5 ergo iis better than xt4 >>
I love your style. Thank You very much.
I thought about buying an X-T5, and afterwards heard of the X-H2. You sum up all the important points for me. I would choose the X-T5, because i don't care about video, and i think, i have to lern how to use the gear, instead of the gear has to adopt to my inability. But, in the end, i sty with canon, and try to get a R7. It's not that easy in Austria right now, but just it fits me the best.
I hit the subscribe button and shared this video on mastodon. Looking foreward to your comming videos. But not only for gear. I have to learn much more.
Thanks! 😁📷
Long time Canon user here but sorely tempted by all things fuji. I enjoyed your video on the x100v and why someone should or shouldn’t get it, and enjoyed this one between these two cameras. I’ll probably end up with an older model fuji for home family snaps. What I really want is those Fuji film emulations. Keep up the great work 🤗
You're absolutely right about the shutter button! this is why I always loved Canon's ergo's.......the XH1/2 thinly fujis that feel nice in the hand....and I have the XT4.
As a X-T1, X-T3, and X-H2 owner, the ergonomic change is HUGE. I shoot several multi day events a year, the fact I don't end up with hand cramps after the first hour or two is such a relief. I can say the PASM dial is... meh, take it or leave it, I am still much faster at adjustments on the X-T3, but I've been shooting the XT style camera since the X-T1 was released [near eight or nine years of muscle memory]. The Sub dials on the X-T cameras are not great, they click over to easily in my opinion, especially when you're adjusting without looking. I'll stick with the X-H2, I'll get used to the PASM, and the flip out screen is slowly growing on me for certain situations, especially for shooting extremely awkward angles off a tripod.... Imagine my delight when I realized I didn't have to wade out into a freezing creek bed for a waterfall shot I did recently [Really though three feet deep and six feet wide, placing the tripod from shore was a treat].... I may yet buy an X-T5, but it would be in addition to the X-H2, just a backup in the moment.
you could also get an aftermarket grip or cage to male the x-t4 more comfy
Hi mate, I have been an XT shooter for the past 7 years owning the xt1 then upgrading to an xt2 almost within a year, it's been good enough for me. Just as you say handling heavier zoom glass (particularly my 100-400) the xh2 will be my upgrade and not the xt5 due to so many reasons. I'll miss the 'on the fly' adjustments via the dials but all day comfort and more confidence handling one handed it's an easy transition for me.
@@davidfromdownunder I shot an event shortly after getting my X-H2, and felt far more at ease with the camera than I would of imagined. Yeah, the top dials on the XT cameras are incredible, and I would rather use those for my adjustments, but I can cope for the comfort alone.
@Anthony Mara Yeah mate makes total sense, looking forward to the change and comfort zone
Great stuff, thanks for sharing.
Thanks for commenting! 🙂
A lot of info on the bodies and features. How about AF, image quality, and jpeg colors? I got the XT5. Skipped the XT4. Moved up for the IBIS and sensor changes. I’ve always been about the quality and size of the kit. I appreciate the “downsizing”. I didn’t want to keep being “bumped” up in size and weight! Thanks Booray!
They have the same AF and the same sensor. I didn't talk about images because they are basically the same camera just wrapped in different bodies.
Thanks for this analysis. I went with 2 x X-H2s...Actually, the X-H2 has a much larger buffer than the X-T5... 😇
I have an XT3 and XT4, and love them. I got a chance to shoot an XH2 for a couple of outings. I loved the feel of the H2 and I really liked the EVF. I'm a landscape photo guy and since I use an L-bracket, I'm happy the remote release port is back on the right side like the XT3. I'll be saving for the XH2. Thanks for the video!
I'm thinking about getting a small rig bracket for mine just to get something under my little finger :)
@@BoorayPerry I use the Smallrig L brackets (with the wood grip) on both my cameras as I have big hands and appreciate the larger grip.
@@philipsturm I like that one but I don't think they have it for the xh2 yet..
@@BoorayPerry Absolutely worth the investment, I like having the extra stability for certain.
Nice video Buddy, I just got the xt5,really enjoying it. For the ergonomics. I got a L grip and that did the Job.Also for the dials the front one I used for SS and the one in the back i use it for ISO and control the aperture on the lens.
Okay, so I have a bunch of Fuji’s. I have rarely used my X100V, it’s just not the right focal length in reality for my photography. Sooo, thinking about it selling it and getting either the XH2 or XT5. It’s tough because I do like the dials and retro look. However, the XH2 EVF and grip and better weather-sealing may just swing it. I do have an XT3, so if I keep that, then maybe I have the best of both. Decisions decisions.
I just bought a silver XT5 and it looks awesome with the retro design. But the moment I held a XH2 in my hands, it was a big difference. The XH2 just felt so comfortable and natural in the hands. Thinking of trading my XT5 for the XH2 just for ergonomics lol
Thank You for this video, it is excellent.
Thanks for watching and thanks for the comment! Don't forget to like and subscribe :)
I think the main difference can be boiled down to the X-T5 is a stills camera and the X-H2 is a hybrid....that is why they brought back that marvellous stills centric 3 way flip screen, only SD cards - CF Express not needed for stills - (unless all you do is constant burst shots) So, if you are a still shooter the X-T5 is a dream come true!! Tbe X-H2 and 2s are for hybrid and video user in the main
I feel that way too except there are things they left off the X-T5 that are good for stills as well, especially event shooters. For example, sports shooters want a battery grip. Nature shooters might like to be able to flip and close the screen for protection (and it's better sealed). If they really wanted to make the X-T5 a stills camera they would have dropped the vide all together and added a built in ND filter. :)
@@BoorayPerry Agree with most of that....but they can't please all of the people unfortunately. I love my X-T5 so far (I have never shot video and don't intend to!!) Thanks for the comparison, good for folks still trying to make up their mind
@@NJM1948 Like I said, either one is fantastic.
The X-T5 still shoots brilliant video although I agree it seems more aimed at stills photography. I sold my X-T4 and bought the 5 as I found myself really disliking the flip out screen. The 5 is much better suited to my needs as I don’t shoot much video or do blogging. Even though it’s slightly smaller than the 4 I find it more comfortable to hold, even for my large hands
@@BoorayPerry Out of the latest Fujifilm offerings I think the X-H2s is the obvious choice for live action/sports.
Great video, but there are some mistakes in this video. The viewfinder of the X-T5 is also 0.8x magnification (not 0.75x as mentioned in the video). The screen resolution of the X-T5 is 1.84 million dots and the X-H2 has 1.62 million dots (it was backwards in the video)
Question for anyone who can answer this, I just got the XH2, how big of a print can you make with that ?
Theoretically as big as you want.
The files are 7728 on the long side. Most printers recommend a 300DPI image min. So, 7728/300 = 25. 25 inches on the long side.
However, that's not taking into account "perceived size." If you stood a comfortable viewing distance from the 25 inch print, then you printed it at 50 inches and stood the same distance, it might not look good because it is 150DPI. BUT you wouldn't stand the same distance, you would back up which would make the image shrink in your vision to something closer to the 25 inch print... making it 300DPI in your vision.
This is how billboards work. They are not printed at 300DPI because no camera can shoot that image.
Add to this the ability to upscale an image and the sky is the limit.
I know I'm here late, but the grip, illuminated top screen, vertical grip availability, and PASM dial made the x-h2 a no brainer. Especially as a photojournalist
I went with xt5 because I liked my xt2 and xt3 so I changed for the larger sensor did not have to relearn how to operate. I went thru that pain when when I switched from Nikon DSLR (800e,7200) for less weight before Nikon had mirrorless. I agree ergonomics of the H2 would be better when I use my 100-400 but not a biggie for me. So far happy with xt5 and will probably get a another one for I like the same camera for my backup too.
Excellent points but by your Logic and mine would the XH-2S not be even better ? The sensor is better, the AF is up there with the Big boys and superb speed 40 FPS and higher DR Dynamic Range again for a few hundred Quid more… 🙂
I do a lot of event work which means a lot of cropping so I want the 40mp sensor. :)
Thanks for a great video. Would you say that both of these would be a step up from the new Sony a6700? I have the a6400 and I really like the xh2, though I am concerned that it may be a bit bulky compared to the smaller form factor of the a6700. Thanks
I can't say because I really don't know much about the Sony line. I would look at the auto focus first because Sony is supposed to do that better.