Also. Buy the “best camera” that feels the Best in your hands. .. This is the only camera where I’m willing to let that slide a bit. Truly a gem. 💁🏻♀️💕
The LCD has a plastic screen protector glued down - it's got a layer of anti reflective coating with gets damaged very easily. It's also easy to peel off and put a new protector on. When I buy second hand sony cameras, I go for the ones with the "worn LCDs" but otherwise in good condition because a lot of people get put off and it goes much, much cheaper. Then you can switch out the protector and it looks pretty much new.
Very true @JimlBoblJones- this is common across most of their last 10 years of a variety of models. I have removed the layer on a number of NEX series camera bodies, I just didn't have time to get into it in this video.
I bought this little beast when it first came out and still have it in mint condition since I rarely ever use it. The few photos that I have taken with it are absolutely spectacular!!
i have the m3 i got it for 315 after selling my canon rebel sl3. Its been great for small video favors and amazing street photography use. This will forever be my fall back discrete emergency camera and will always go with me everywhere. I dont need anything more than the really great capable rx100 m3
The m2 is also the one I chose based on functionality/need in the sense that it is the only one that really improved on the picture quality with a BSI sensor while all the others were mainly featured I didn't need (except maybe a built in ND filter on the m3). Made sure to stick a screen protector and lens protector on since day 1, and it has been working flawlessly since then :) awesome review!
I’m planning on purchasing the RX 100 VII to lighten my load. I have multiple Canon bodies and too many lenses. I rarely shoot with my 70 - 200 anymore. And the shots I shoot at 200 aren’t as important as my wide angle shots. So out with the long lens and into the pocket with the RX100 VII. As far as camera usage goes, I agree with you. Get the one that covers the most bases for your needs. My full frames will cover 99.% of my work and the RX100 VII will cover that 1%. The best part is that with the RX100 VII, I’ll start shooting my motorcycle trips and forest shots. Heck, it’s so inconspicuous I’ll be able to shoot in areas where people get triggered by a full frame. The bottom line is I’ll be able to enjoy shooting because it won’t feel like work. I just want to have fun and it’s worth the price of entry to the photographers playground.
The MK II is one of my two EDC cameras - I like to leave it in monochrome for street shots. The other EDC is a Lumix DC-ZS70, my favorite for color and telephoto.
How timely for this video! I just bought a III and VII and unsure which to keep. Initial comparisons with same settings have shown that the image on VII is brighter (at least on screen, not mentioned in specs either) but VII does struggle more at night. I'm honestly not sure if the extra zoom is worth the loss of light. Will keep playing with them both before I make a decision (or maybe try out the V). Keep up the good work!
That's awesome, I believe the VII has a better LCD resolution by a fair measure VS the III, which may explain screen brightness and added detail. Have you used the mic input yet on the VII?
I purchased the RX100 in 2012 and still use it as a hiking and travel camera. It has always been reliable. I prefer having a flat screen as it isn't another possible breakage issue. I have other equipment that can do video so there's no reason to "update" to a newer RX100 model. The image quality is very good. Remember it's the photographer not the camera that's responsible for the results.
I had the RX100m3 wayback 2017 and all its photos are still relevant now. I've had a D750, A6400, XT-3, D7200 cameras before, they all have been replaced over and over again but the RX100 is the last one to go. Rx100 is a very good point and shoot, you can just wear it in your neck and forget about it until you need it, specially if you have kids where DSLR is already hassle to bring. They say the best camera is the one you have in your hand at that moment, but in reality we don't bring a DSLR because its too big and you need to store it inside the bag from time to time.
I was looking for a new lens back in 2020 and for the same price I could buy the RX100vii and I figured it was better spent money considering the 24-200+any other abilities so I got it. As I started using it I quickly realized I preferred carrying the RX100(+ any of its accessories) instead of the full frame gear(I'm not an expert). I liked it so much that when my local store got a few new ones in, and fearing Sony has ended the RX line, in I bought a second one as a back up....just in case. In spite of any limitations it's the camera I reach for first....YMMV
I have the RX100VA. I have a number of Sony's - A5100, A6500, A7C and I also have a Lumix LX100II. When I'm on the go I seem to gravitate to the LX100II. I can't put my finger on it but there is something about it's Micro 4/3's sensor.
Wow, what a great collection of Sony's- Have used the A5100 and A6500 quite a bit, but not the A7C. I have a LX100 but not the II, what's your favorite feature of it? Thanks for the comment and happy shooting!
Have a VII but want a II for the flash hotshoe to use the new Flashpoint Nano flash trigger for a mini portrait setup. How does the autofocus compare on these two?
Your VII has 357 focus points vs only 25 on the RX100 II. So for any shot with lots of details/variability will be better covered by the VII, but for simple shooting, I have found the RX100 II (was my primary a number of years ago) to be more than sufficient for every day use. Also the low light ISO is slightly better on the II VS VII. Bummer the VII doesn't have a hotshoe!
I have the Mk II and after all these years I still haven't figured out everything it is capable to do. Very advanced for its time, probably even more advanced now, because everything is made dumb easy by smartphones and AI.
the V is the best of this lineup unless you really want the 200mm zoom...when they took away built in ND filters in the VI i was instantly out and sticking with my V !
I have the original RX100. The RX100, and all following cameras in that series have a fundamental flaw. The placement of the tripod 1/4"-20 screw hole makes it impossible to replace the battery or the memory card while the camera is on a tripod. It even blocks the HDMI port. The other issue with this camera is that the lens is only sharp at the widest zoom. Any zoom in, and the picture gets soft. At fully wide though, it is very sharp. The 30 minute limit on video has bitten me far too often. That being said, I have not found anything better to replace it with. I'm still using it as my primary portable camera.
Quite right- Canon to this day is still producing new R series Bodies that have this same issue! Glad to hear you're getting some good use out of the OG RX100!
❤❤❤🎉🎉🎉Very good video !! I just have one question. Is a Sony RX 100 m4 camera for $200 a good option in 2023? I would appreciate your response, thank you very much in advance
@@pricklypearcamera Thank you so much!! I just bought the camera and the truth is that it is a very good camera, I will just keep watching your videos to learn how to take good photos. A hug and thanks for your advice.
Hi, I’ve got a canon 700d but I’m currently looking for a more compact camera for everyday use and do some travelling with (Iceland and Switzerland this year at least). My main focus is the photography aspect but of course I want the videos to be good as well and currently I’m torn between the Canon G7x Mark III and the Sony RX100 VII, so I would like to know if you’ve got experience with both or just the Sony?
Hi! Yes, I have used the G7X I, II, and III cameras. To preface my response, I think both the G7X III and RX100 VII both produce great image quality, as both have 1" sensors, but I do prefer the Sony if price point is not an issue (the sony is nearly 80% more expensive than the G7X III currently). In terms of still image capabilities between the two, one of the bigger differences is that the Canon lens is 100mm equivalent max whereas the RX100 VII is 200MM, so double the optical range (helpful if you are taking nature shots, or longer distance zoom shots). I really like that the RX100 VII has a built in viewfinder (I use it almost exclusively vs the LCD screen), and the G7X III does not have a viewfinder. Both the G7X III and RX100 VII have mic inputs which is really a must if you are shooting any sort of video (you can find movo, rode, or other similar inexpensive mics if you don't have one that will greatly improve audio quality). For video shooting, I have noticed that the toggle zoom of the Sony tends to result in "smoother" shots vs the Canon which can "jump" a bit when zooming. Both cameras due to their compact size and lack of real cooling vs larger camera or camcorder do tend to run hot when shooting 4k video. Something to take note of. If you are shooting in 1080p, I haven't noticed nearly as much issues with heat. I hope this was helpful! Kevin
The sony is great - Ive got the rx100V. Its major downside in relation to the Canon is its not easy to change settings without having to go through settings. Also manual is difficult due to fiddly controls. I find I cant take photos without taking the camera away from my eye to access settings unless its on an auto setting which is pointless (you can get cheaper small cameras if you just want to use auto. I think the later models may have a touch screen so may be a lot better in this respect. So the canon is bigger but more usable. If you dont mind having a single focal length of either 28mm or 40mm (full frame equivilence), the Ricoh griii or griiix is far better - its a similar size but has a much larger crop sensor, IBIS and a sensor with no anti aliasing filter which when matched with their excellent lens gives incredibly sharp results. The Ricoh is so easy to use, even one handed with all settings easily accessible - so far more practical. However, the Ricohs have no flash and no viewfinder (you can get an optical viewfinger as a 'framing tool' as an accessory that fits on the hot shoe). Hope this helps.
That's a solid deal for the IV if it is in good/very good shape. The market price is around $500 for IV and around $575 for the V. if you can find the V for $500ish then I would say the $100 bump in price is worth it IMO.
I have the M2 and I love it! video + picture quality are amazing, my only thing is I want to vlog and it sucks that I have to use an external view finder to see. Also I don’t like that I can’t input an external mic, the sound isn’t the greatest 😕 any tips on improving it for vlogging
Thats a great one! But, as you pointed out does struggle with audio. There’s no real “tech” solution, but if you are vlogging in a more permanent location, you could invest jn trying to sound-treat the room you are in with curtains/acoustic panels, etc.
So, on my model and serial number label for my rx100, also says "N50" . What does that mean? It looks like it's important towards the model spesification. I don't know what version it is. never heard of a rx100 n50
Excellent video, thanks a lot! I have the RX 100 MK iv and I love it. I am looking for the MK VII though since I’d love to have a mic input and also the extra zoom looks really tempting. Is the zoom worth it?
I have mk1, mk2, mk5A, mk7. I compared: mk2 best color and cleanliness, this is my favorite. MK5A and MK7 very fast focus and operating, but the picture is not the same as the mk2.
Nice! The rx100 ii is one of my favorites and I still shoot with it often. I do like the rx100 5-7 autofocus improvements which are great. You’ve got quite the impressive collection!
Hi! Really glad to find this \ video as i'm planning to buy used RX100, and I'm torn between III and V for recording concert, which require much zooming in low light. I'm interested in V as it has 4K, but would it improve the quality of the video? Thanks
Certainly a tough choice, the resale market for the rX100 line has actually gone up in the last few years. I still have mine and shoot with it occasionally
Great question, the VIII was rumored to have been projected to release as early as 2020, but as of today in 2023 there is still not a projected release date that I have seen.
So I have a question, since I got Sony 200-600 mm G for my bird photography, now I am looking for still photography for landscapes, but it's not my priority - the clue is TO NOT SHOOT WITH A PHONE, but something with better quality and beeing pocketable.. I want something with a good quality (at least "fine" to print "sometimes"). I know it's on the edge of impossible (at least from actual perspective) but is there any RX that can handle it? I thought about LUMIX GM1 with 12-32 mm, but .. I don't know?? 🤦♀🤦♀😅😅
The real time tracking on the RX100 VII is really quite good, you can adjust in menu and select a target frame and it would focus track the bird as it moved in the frame. I haven't personally used the GM1, so couldn't comment on that, but have seen a lot of satisfied users of it.
@@pricklypearcamera The problem I found in GM1 is a 5-7 frames in buffer, so you need to wait a 7-15 seconds to clear the buffer. That's.. specific thing. The pros are it's 4/3 sensor, but the cons are few. I heared the people are happy and it's really hard to complain because it's very old camera and very cheap for today standards. RX is more compact, but I am so sad I can not test it out... 😐😐Thanks!
The sony can do it but is obviously limited by the tiny sensor, particularly at dawn and dusk when a lot of landscape photos get taken. Full Frame is, in my opinion better for landscape photography but can be a bit cumbersome for walking far with so I often try with my Sony RX100V or with my Ricoh griii which has a 28mm lens, crop sensor but no viewfinder or multi angle screen.
In short, it aint broke dont fix it. I think the main point the creator makes is that, unless you’re deliberately looking for the features in mark iii or above, the mark ii can do what most people look for in a point and shoot camera with great quality, and at a low price
"Buy the camera that you'll use the most" is some of the most useless advice ever. You don't know what you'll use the most until you buy it and use it. It sounds like something someone says when he/she wants to appear wise and knowledgeable.
I can buy a secondhand III or V and want to use it for evening urban photography, do I need the extra autofocus points and extra speedy 150fps? The price difference is big, but I want to buy the right choice for me, but I don’t have a clue🫣
Also. Buy the “best camera” that feels the Best in your hands. ..
This is the only camera where I’m willing to let that slide a bit. Truly a gem. 💁🏻♀️💕
The LCD has a plastic screen protector glued down - it's got a layer of anti reflective coating with gets damaged very easily. It's also easy to peel off and put a new protector on.
When I buy second hand sony cameras, I go for the ones with the "worn LCDs" but otherwise in good condition because a lot of people get put off and it goes much, much cheaper. Then you can switch out the protector and it looks pretty much new.
Very true @JimlBoblJones- this is common across most of their last 10 years of a variety of models. I have removed the layer on a number of NEX series camera bodies, I just didn't have time to get into it in this video.
Just snagged a RX100M5 for $210 out the door from a pawn shop. Sold my perfect condition M1 to a family member for $100.
That's an amazing deal for the RX100 V, the average used street price for that camera is around $500. Hope you have fun with it!
Nice find. That’s what I just picked up a mark 3 for.
Both a bargain for that price, well done for your sense of value and generosity!
100$?! What a scam
I bought this little beast when it first came out and still have it in mint condition since I rarely ever use it. The few photos that I have taken with it are absolutely spectacular!!
i have the m3 i got it for 315 after selling my canon rebel sl3. Its been great for small video favors and amazing street photography use. This will forever be my fall back discrete emergency camera and will always go with me everywhere. I dont need anything more than the really great capable rx100 m3
@loui.e0241 Nice! The RX100 III is a superb street photography cam. Good pickup for around $300 too! Have fun with it!
Just got the M2 and I'm just trying the different modes. Thanks for the video.
The m2 is also the one I chose based on functionality/need in the sense that it is the only one that really improved on the picture quality with a BSI sensor while all the others were mainly featured I didn't need (except maybe a built in ND filter on the m3). Made sure to stick a screen protector and lens protector on since day 1, and it has been working flawlessly since then :) awesome review!
Very cool! Love the RX100 II!
I’m planning on purchasing the RX 100 VII to lighten my load. I have multiple Canon bodies and too many lenses. I rarely shoot with my 70 - 200 anymore. And the shots I shoot at 200 aren’t as important as my wide angle shots. So out with the long lens and into the pocket with the RX100 VII.
As far as camera usage goes, I agree with you. Get the one that covers the most bases for your needs. My full frames will cover 99.% of my work and the RX100 VII will cover that 1%.
The best part is that with the RX100 VII, I’ll start shooting my motorcycle trips and forest shots. Heck, it’s so inconspicuous I’ll be able to shoot in areas where people get triggered by a full frame.
The bottom line is I’ll be able to enjoy shooting because it won’t feel like work.
I just want to have fun and it’s worth the price of entry to the photographers playground.
The MK II is one of my two EDC cameras - I like to leave it in monochrome for street shots. The other EDC is a Lumix DC-ZS70, my favorite for color and telephoto.
That's awesome! I haven't used my II in monochrome often, but will have to give it a shot! Also, great choice on the ZS70!~ Love the Panasonics.
How timely for this video! I just bought a III and VII and unsure which to keep. Initial comparisons with same settings have shown that the image on VII is brighter (at least on screen, not mentioned in specs either) but VII does struggle more at night. I'm honestly not sure if the extra zoom is worth the loss of light. Will keep playing with them both before I make a decision (or maybe try out the V). Keep up the good work!
That's awesome, I believe the VII has a better LCD resolution by a fair measure VS the III, which may explain screen brightness and added detail. Have you used the mic input yet on the VII?
exactly the video I wanted. Thank you very much 👍🏼
I purchased the RX100 in 2012 and still use it as a hiking and travel camera. It has always been reliable. I prefer having a flat screen as it isn't another possible breakage issue. I have other equipment that can do video so there's no reason to "update" to a newer RX100 model. The image quality is very good. Remember it's the photographer not the camera that's responsible for the results.
Very true! I think that in the hands of an apt photographer, nearly any camera made can produce great images.
I had the RX100m3 wayback 2017 and all its photos are still relevant now.
I've had a D750, A6400, XT-3, D7200 cameras before, they all have been replaced over and over again but the RX100 is the last one to go.
Rx100 is a very good point and shoot, you can just wear it in your neck and forget about it until you need it, specially if you have kids where DSLR is already hassle to bring.
They say the best camera is the one you have in your hand at that moment, but in reality we don't bring a DSLR because its too big and you need to store it inside the bag from time to time.
Just picked up an Rx100 m2 for it's hotshoe and wireless flash🔥
I was looking for a new lens back in 2020 and for the same price I could buy the RX100vii and I figured it was better spent money considering the 24-200+any other abilities so I got it. As I started using it I quickly realized I preferred carrying the RX100(+ any of its accessories) instead of the full frame gear(I'm not an expert). I liked it so much that when my local store got a few new ones in, and fearing Sony has ended the RX line, in I bought a second one as a back up....just in case. In spite of any limitations it's the camera I reach for first....YMMV
Mate, Mk I and Mk II have both EXACTLY the same lens. It was changed for Mk III - Mk V and then changed again for Mk VI - Mk VII.
I have the RX100VA. I have a number of Sony's - A5100, A6500, A7C and I also have a Lumix LX100II. When I'm on the go I seem to gravitate to the LX100II. I can't put my finger on it but there is something about it's Micro 4/3's sensor.
Wow, what a great collection of Sony's- Have used the A5100 and A6500 quite a bit, but not the A7C. I have a LX100 but not the II, what's your favorite feature of it? Thanks for the comment and happy shooting!
Have a VII but want a II for the flash hotshoe to use the new Flashpoint Nano flash trigger for a mini portrait setup. How does the autofocus compare on these two?
Your VII has 357 focus points vs only 25 on the RX100 II. So for any shot with lots of details/variability will be better covered by the VII, but for simple shooting, I have found the RX100 II (was my primary a number of years ago) to be more than sufficient for every day use. Also the low light ISO is slightly better on the II VS VII. Bummer the VII doesn't have a hotshoe!
RX100 OG starts at f1.8 too
I have the Mk II and after all these years I still haven't figured out everything it is capable to do. Very advanced for its time, probably even more advanced now, because everything is made dumb easy by smartphones and AI.
Great camera! Yes I am finding new features/ways to shoot that is still amazes me
the V is the best of this lineup unless you really want the 200mm zoom...when they took away built in ND filters in the VI i was instantly out and sticking with my V !
Love my RX100V
Great camera! How long have you been using it?
I love mine too, I don’t think I’ll ever upgrade to a newer version unless they put a much faster lens with the ND filter.
I have the original RX100. The RX100, and all following cameras in that series have a fundamental flaw. The placement of the tripod 1/4"-20 screw hole makes it impossible to replace the battery or the memory card while the camera is on a tripod. It even blocks the HDMI port. The other issue with this camera is that the lens is only sharp at the widest zoom. Any zoom in, and the picture gets soft. At fully wide though, it is very sharp. The 30 minute limit on video has bitten me far too often. That being said, I have not found anything better to replace it with. I'm still using it as my primary portable camera.
Quite right- Canon to this day is still producing new R series Bodies that have this same issue! Glad to hear you're getting some good use out of the OG RX100!
❤❤❤🎉🎉🎉Very good video !! I just have one question. Is a Sony RX 100 m4 camera for $200 a good option in 2023? I would appreciate your response, thank you very much in advance
That is a killer deal! I think the average street price for the iv in the US at least is $400-450 depending on condition.
@@pricklypearcamera Thank you so much!! I just bought the camera and the truth is that it is a very good camera, I will just keep watching your videos to learn how to take good photos. A hug and thanks for your advice.
The RX 100ii has what I need-great images, wifi, pocketable and tilting screen. I don’t care about any of the later updates.
No doubting you there, love the RX100 II!
It doesn't have wifi connectivity , are you sure?
@@rjtjaggiit does
Thank you!
I got my mint rx100 mk1 2 weeks ago for CAN$200. 🎉🎉🎉
Nice!
Hi, I’ve got a canon 700d but I’m currently looking for a more compact camera for everyday use and do some travelling with (Iceland and Switzerland this year at least). My main focus is the photography aspect but of course I want the videos to be good as well and currently I’m torn between the Canon G7x Mark III and the Sony RX100 VII, so I would like to know if you’ve got experience with both or just the Sony?
Hi! Yes, I have used the G7X I, II, and III cameras. To preface my response, I think both the G7X III and RX100 VII both produce great image quality, as both have 1" sensors, but I do prefer the Sony if price point is not an issue (the sony is nearly 80% more expensive than the G7X III currently). In terms of still image capabilities between the two, one of the bigger differences is that the Canon lens is 100mm equivalent max whereas the RX100 VII is 200MM, so double the optical range (helpful if you are taking nature shots, or longer distance zoom shots). I really like that the RX100 VII has a built in viewfinder (I use it almost exclusively vs the LCD screen), and the G7X III does not have a viewfinder. Both the G7X III and RX100 VII have mic inputs which is really a must if you are shooting any sort of video (you can find movo, rode, or other similar inexpensive mics if you don't have one that will greatly improve audio quality). For video shooting, I have noticed that the toggle zoom of the Sony tends to result in "smoother" shots vs the Canon which can "jump" a bit when zooming. Both cameras due to their compact size and lack of real cooling vs larger camera or camcorder do tend to run hot when shooting 4k video. Something to take note of. If you are shooting in 1080p, I haven't noticed nearly as much issues with heat. I hope this was helpful! Kevin
The sony is great - Ive got the rx100V. Its major downside in relation to the Canon is its not easy to change settings without having to go through settings. Also manual is difficult due to fiddly controls. I find I cant take photos without taking the camera away from my eye to access settings unless its on an auto setting which is pointless (you can get cheaper small cameras if you just want to use auto. I think the later models may have a touch screen so may be a lot better in this respect. So the canon is bigger but more usable. If you dont mind having a single focal length of either 28mm or 40mm (full frame equivilence), the Ricoh griii or griiix is far better - its a similar size but has a much larger crop sensor, IBIS and a sensor with no anti aliasing filter which when matched with their excellent lens gives incredibly sharp results. The Ricoh is so easy to use, even one handed with all settings easily accessible - so far more practical. However, the Ricohs have no flash and no viewfinder (you can get an optical viewfinger as a 'framing tool' as an accessory that fits on the hot shoe). Hope this helps.
I can pick up a IV for 400$ US. Should I wait to possibly spend a little more to get the V for the added focal points?
That's a solid deal for the IV if it is in good/very good shape. The market price is around $500 for IV and around $575 for the V. if you can find the V for $500ish then I would say the $100 bump in price is worth it IMO.
I have the M2 and I love it! video + picture quality are amazing, my only thing is I want to vlog and it sucks that I have to use an external view finder to see. Also I don’t like that I can’t input an external mic, the sound isn’t the greatest 😕 any tips on improving it for vlogging
Thats a great one! But, as you pointed out does struggle with audio. There’s no real “tech” solution, but if you are vlogging in a more permanent location, you could invest jn trying to sound-treat the room you are in with curtains/acoustic panels, etc.
@@pricklypearcamera thank you kindly!!!
So, on my model and serial number label for my rx100, also says "N50" . What does that mean? It looks like it's important towards the model spesification. I don't know what version it is. never heard of a rx100 n50
N50 is just a Sony added identifier on the bottom of the camera just above and to the right of the serial #. Your cam sounds like a standard RX100
@@pricklypearcamera identifies what then? Sometimes something nternally for Sony?
Ihave the original and I find the highlights can easily over expose ( blow out) such as sky in landscapes.
That's good to know- it's been a while since I shot with the RX100 I and did so mostly indoors.
Excellent video, thanks a lot! I have the RX 100 MK iv and I love it. I am looking for the MK VII though since I’d love to have a mic input and also the extra zoom looks really tempting. Is the zoom worth it?
That's what I am stressed about, it's either better apreture and nd filter or great autofocus and zoom range. Need someone's insights to choose
@@EricKpro9I think for most people who can effort the price tag the MK Vll is worth it
do any of the camera in this series have problems with overheating ?
Yeah, they can-but mainly in video and more applies to iv and up when shooting 4k, can definitely get hot fast.
I have mk1, mk2, mk5A, mk7. I compared: mk2 best color and cleanliness, this is my favorite. MK5A and MK7 very fast focus and operating, but the picture is not the same as the mk2.
Nice! The rx100 ii is one of my favorites and I still shoot with it often. I do like the rx100 5-7 autofocus improvements which are great. You’ve got quite the impressive collection!
@@pricklypearcamera Thanks!
Great Job thanks i love my mk2
Hi! Really glad to find this \ video as i'm planning to buy used RX100, and I'm torn between III and V for recording concert, which require much zooming in low light. I'm interested in V as it has 4K, but would it improve the quality of the video? Thanks
I'm curious which one did you choose? im torn between III and V as well
Hello, I’m curious about which one you chose!
bought one for $50, best deal imo
Nice! Which version? The original rx100 or second?
Im having rx100 m2 and planning to sell it out since i have brought iphone 15 recently. What do you think im i making a right decision?
Certainly a tough choice, the resale market for the rX100 line has actually gone up in the last few years. I still have mine and shoot with it occasionally
Is it worth waiting for the new version or get the current model which is now five years old?
Great question, the VIII was rumored to have been projected to release as early as 2020, but as of today in 2023 there is still not a projected release date that I have seen.
So I have a question, since I got Sony 200-600 mm G for my bird photography, now I am looking for still photography for landscapes, but it's not my priority - the clue is TO NOT SHOOT WITH A PHONE, but something with better quality and beeing pocketable.. I want something with a good quality (at least "fine" to print "sometimes"). I know it's on the edge of impossible (at least from actual perspective) but is there any RX that can handle it? I thought about LUMIX GM1 with 12-32 mm, but .. I don't know?? 🤦♀🤦♀😅😅
The real time tracking on the RX100 VII is really quite good, you can adjust in menu and select a target frame and it would focus track the bird as it moved in the frame. I haven't personally used the GM1, so couldn't comment on that, but have seen a lot of satisfied users of it.
@@pricklypearcamera The problem I found in GM1 is a 5-7 frames in buffer, so you need to wait a 7-15 seconds to clear the buffer. That's.. specific thing. The pros are it's 4/3 sensor, but the cons are few. I heared the people are happy and it's really hard to complain because it's very old camera and very cheap for today standards. RX is more compact, but I am so sad I can not test it out... 😐😐Thanks!
The sony can do it but is obviously limited by the tiny sensor, particularly at dawn and dusk when a lot of landscape photos get taken. Full Frame is, in my opinion better for landscape photography but can be a bit cumbersome for walking far with so I often try with my Sony RX100V or with my Ricoh griii which has a 28mm lens, crop sensor but no viewfinder or multi angle screen.
So why the mkii over the others? Because Marques said so? Lol
In short, it aint broke dont fix it. I think the main point the creator makes is that, unless you’re deliberately looking for the features in mark iii or above, the mark ii can do what most people look for in a point and shoot camera with great quality, and at a low price
Many people consider the original MK1 to be the best, prices of these are rapidly going up.
They sure are- I remember when you could find a minty RX100 original for $150-200, and now they are $300-400 in great shape
I have MkIII cost £750 in 2017. Find 75mm is limiting
You forgot the VA sir
What was this filmed with? 🤪
Hi, it was filmed with a canon eos M50 II
Forgotten the VA
"Buy the camera that you'll use the most" is some of the most useless advice ever. You don't know what you'll use the most until you buy it and use it. It sounds like something someone says when he/she wants to appear wise and knowledgeable.
I can buy a secondhand III or V and want to use it for evening urban photography, do I need the extra autofocus points and extra speedy 150fps? The price difference is big, but I want to buy the right choice for me, but I don’t have a clue🫣
Buy the V, only 25 contrast detect points on the III which isn’t really all that good nowadays