I'm still confused between the two, but from where I am the ground clearance will be an issue, so I'm more inclined towards ronin & it's features are also a plus point.
@@ThisĪsDeadpool-e1p I don't think that it would be a wise decision. The Thunderbird is a way too better machine than the Hunter with good ride quality and comfort.
Bro to be honest both front and back fender are metal and tank too( did excessive research )and Ronin gives far better mileage then hunter , My bike already gives nearly 40 before 1st service itself. Things which are better for Ronin 1.Milage 2.More metal parts in body 3.Gtt(glide through traffic) many people miss this point 4.Upside down front suspension 5.Mono shock back suspension 6.Total led setup 7.Lesser service cost of TVS. 8.Trip navigation and Bluetooth connectivity (doesn't comes as accessory) 9.Lesser body weight 160kgs 10.More bass in exhaust note. I have ridden both,and hunter doesn't has the RE feeling.
Everything is nice on the Hunter, but the ground clearance is surely an issue. This is India and not the US or Japan. The speedbreakers, especially with the weight of the pillion will have you scraping things.
it will not be an issue, i have Thunderbird X with just 135 mm ground clearance.. i did whole ladhakh trip and never faced any issue.. though in city some speed breakers need to be crossed very slowly
I know you guys are appealing mostly to your home market, but I can tell you that here in New Zealand, I find your reviews very informative. Thanks for sharing 🤩
If you can make us Indians happy, and convince them then you can convince anyone! XD Hope the vlogs of all our Indian creators are helping you a lot when it comes to the biking world :)
Even though both have same power figure....since ronin is 20kgs lighter than hunter, it would feel much more pepy...additionally the lower weight permits lower torque figure too which is 7Nm less than a hunter. Also, due to GTT in ronin, it would feel much easier city commuter than hunter
@@sandypan777 for that u need a wider bandwidth not short gearing, short gearing makes u be on toes every time I do 10 kmph at times on my rtr 200 and dont press clutch, although 2nd would be a peppy gear to get out faster , 10-12 at 3rd doesnt make me worried about stall
Being a Mechanical engineer and a designer in automotive field, I have following observations. I was looking for a family bike for city rides mostly with a flat (horizontal seat), circular headlamp and retro-like + premium design (not like 100-150cc bikes). After exploring lot of bikes, I finalized three options to compare. 1. Honda H'ness 350 CC 2. Royal Enfield Hunter Rebel 350 CC 3. TVS Ronin 225 CC I test drove all 3 vehicles 2-3 times and following are my observations, 1. Honda H'ness 350 CC - *Pros* - Nice retro/classic look, Low end torque is good, Seating space for pillion rider is more than other two vehicles. *Cons* - Bulkier (Box size), Paint quality, Higher cost as compared to other two vehicles 2. Royal Enfield Hunter Rebel 350 CC - *Pros* - Beautiful Design/Styling/Look, Great color schemes, Turning radius is smaller than Ronin (Less space to turn the vehicle), Reasonable cost. *Cons* - The biggest issue (design flaw) is positioning of foot rest (pegs), just below the sitting position. This makes it difficult to keep your feet on ground while you are at signal or in slow moving traffic. Foot rest (pegs) keep touching your legs and is very uncomfortable. Another point is that seat on rear end tapers downward and seating space for pillion rider being less, pillion rider tend to move back and when you accelerate, pillion may feel like toppling/falling down at back side. So this is not safe and hence, back rest is MUST. Handle bar positioned in such a way that you need to keep your hands stretched straight all the times which is not a comfortable sitting posture. Low end torque/performance (2 & 3 gear) is sluggish due to bigger engine. (Not as good as smaller capacity bikes) 3. TVS Ronin 225 CC - *Pros* - Semi-retro look with circular headlamp, Driveability and Performance is superb. Handle bar position is very good for comfortable sitting posture with hands slightly bent in elbows. Very easy to handle in traffic. *Cons* - Very bad design/aesthetics of fuel tank (some odd shape), Color schemes are odd (not impressive), Turning radius is higher than Hunter (Needs larger space to turn the vehicle). Cost is on higher side for lower CC as compared to Hunter (mainly due to features). Overall, none of them is meeting my requirements (as mentioned above) and hence, I decided to wait for Kawasaki W175 or Yamaha XSR or Improved version of Royal Enfield Hunter. All the best! Regards, Jayesh Shimpi
I would say that you should wait till the bajaj & triumph collab bike hits the market and then compare all of them together, so that at the end of the day you won't feel disappointed.
I also have the same feeling bro, still waiting for Yamaha XSR 155, I hope they launch it soon considering the demand for retro segment motorcycles in India now............ Bajaj x Triumph design looks good (spy shot images) but not sure about the ride quality and price.............
Totally agree with you on Ronin's aesthetics. It looks confusing. I faced the footpegs problem as well when I test-rode the Hunter 350, 180 kgs of weight hitting my shins was not a pleasurable experience lol. I also test-rode the Hness 350. The newer version has better seats and feels more comfortable. Did you finalize your bike yet? I will buy a bike by 1st week of May'23 and hopefully make my decision by then.
@@rishabhanand01 Finally I felt that 350cc is basically not something which I'll enjoy but I'll be unnecessarily driving & handling a higher box size & higher weight... Then I shifted downward and bought new Bajaj CT125X...it has got a circular headlamp, flat & long seat (for family/kids) and a mini-srambler like look with enhanced sturdiness...so basically meeting all my requirements. I am OK with this 125x than any of 350cc models I tried. Best luck!
I bought the Ronin, the Hunter was yet to be launched and the prelaunch price was supposed to be higher. Now with this killer pricing they seem to have knocked Ronin a solid punch. Having said that I am going out on a limb and saying that the overall cost of ownership may tip it in favour of the Ronin.
I got my Ronin past Friday and it's soo awesome.. with lot of features and all. My only issue is every variant of Ronin has only 2color options. I got the grey one but it would have been nice if we get all the available color options in every variant. Happy riding everyone
@@nilajitsinha6561 that's a plastic pannel.inside we can take a look at the battery,i think it's because to reduce the overall weight of the bike,it's just 160kg for a bike looks both like a scrambler and cruiser. It doesn't bother me that much but there are other's who think it would have been better if that's a metal frame. Maybe soon they will provide an metal frame side pannel accessory....
Everything is perfect in hunter except the most imp part which could change anyone's mind within seconds to consider it is its ground clearance, 150 is damn to low for a cruiser like this Biggest disappointment
4valve head , oil cooler , 20 kilo weight advantage , slipper clutch , USD fork , connected tech, LEDs , 30mm extra ground clearance. Ronin is an absolute deal unless you are a RE fanboy !
@@TusharVarma Is there any fake detail in the list? No... So, even if paid, it is not an issue, unlike the propaganda of some political parties through their fake IDs.
Thanks for the in detailed review, I have purchased the Ronin 225 as it is way too comfortable and features rich machine than the Hunter 350 which also delivers a handsome city mileage than the RE 😇
@@karunakarb2919 we can as it has a strong in built chasis which is a full metal body and the best in class premium tyres from TVS. The Hunter hardly has an experience of a RE machine like that of the Classic 350 or the Meteor
@@thelastsamuraiRonin No problems as of now, will update you if I get one. As of now it is a complete all in one cruser bike which is fun to ride in the city as well as in the highway with no vibrations and fully refined engine. You get every possible feature in this light weight cruser 😇
I took test ride of both the bikes. Initially i was inclined towards hunter as i am a huge RE fanboy but seeing the practicality of everything i feel Ronin is best value for money for 95% of consumers who are going to use it as a daily commuter and weekend rides. Top speed 135+ , Glide through traffic feature, very nimble to manuaver in day to day traffic, super comfort , best riding posture , engine refinement , smooth gear box power to weight ratio is better than hunter so in real world it delivers slipper assist clutch Showa USD forks LEDs all around Bass heavy exhaust note and best of all 40+ milage that will pay dividend in long run. In a nutshell Ronin is complete bike whereas Hunter feels like a downgraded 350 classic.
RE Hunter is good, but I bought Ronin which is VFM with refined engine, loaded features and build quality fit & finished. I did completed 780 kms till now and i didn't any issues yet.
Ronin give 42-45 kmpl with so many features. Range for cruising is 600 km on a single tank! Baat khatam. Why should we buy a clunky bike with 1960's engine?
It's like comparing a Porsche to a Tesla. Yes the Tesla has more power, more torque, more features, less acceleration time, but the riding and owning experience of a Porsche is far better than a Tesla. So yeah, Ronin looks tacky. Hunter definitely.
These small bikes, I want a proper cruiser man, like Indian Motorcycle, Was expecting RE will launch meteor plus, Meteor too don't have much seating space for passenger. Need seating space along with power only then will be able to enjoy the ride. Bajaj avenger might be a good choice but it too got issues.
Lowest Mileage🤦♀️, Grould Clearance🤦♀️Permanent Heavy Liabilities🙆due to Heavy Weight Metal Body, Luggage Space missing, Fuel Tank=>5Ltr, Power=>100cc, Useless Battery operated accessories, Self start, DRL, halogen bulbs, disc brakes, ABS, tubeless, mobile charger, Bluetooth, digital meter etc.. means Heavy Weight=Lowest Mileage🤦♀️= Permanent Heavy Liabilities🙆
Hunter ground clearance is a big concern especially when a pillion above 80 or 90 Kgs sit behind. I feel it would hit speed breakers in such a case. All other cons are kind of manageable I feel.
All royal enfields from 2017 have problems with electrical wires. Bikes costing 2,00,000 have faulty wires , they fail after 2 or 3 years. Get a life royal enfield.... Please dont buy RE!!
All royal enfields from 2017 have problems with electrical wires. Bikes costing 2,00,000 have faulty wires , they fail after 2 or 3 years. Get a life royal enfield.... Please dont buy RE!!
I was obsessed with Ronin when it came out, But after that when hunter got introduced I changed my mind!!. Yes, Ronin is better when it comes to it's key features, like glide through, slipper clutch, USD forks etc. which the hunter doesn't have. But personally I think these features are not a deal breaker for me. 1) Slipper clutch for Ronin is exactly where hunter lacks, hunter with a tighter clutch is a concern. I believe this problem can be solved with a hydraulic clutch conversion's which are popular in 650 twins. 2) USD forks are always better but with this segment, it is not very important. I think hunter is a better choice with it's unique roadster type design and road presence which makes it a one of a kind motorcycle like that of a triumph. Also this bike's got a great potential for future modification's and bolt on accessories which is awesome if you are an enthusiast. Right now my favourite picks of hunter accessories would be tail tidy, bar end mirrors and seat if needed. Overall I think hunter with it's unique character would be a great choice over Ronin. Test driving both and picking one that fits your taste is always the best way to go.
Slipper clutch is very convenient and usd forks are way better than regular one’s on hunter. Both these make a huge difference in riding. So take test rides on both
Slipper clutch makes a huge difference when you are a daily commuter and ride mostly in the city. Till date we don't have a machine like Ronin in Indian two wheeler market which would offer you so much at a reasonable cost. *225cc Liquid + Oiled Cooled Engine. *Power of 20.4 PS and with 19.6 NM of torque with a descent city mileage. *Slipper assist clutch with Adjustable brake and clutch levers. *GTT Technology *Smart Connect feature with turn by turn navigation *Fully digital instrument cluster *Upside Down premium USD front folks with pre load adjustment. *Cruising speed of 130 kmph with no vibrations. *Premium roadblock tyres from TVS for stability and better road grip. *Dual Channel ABS with riding modes. *Full LED light set up with LED DRLs and LED indicators.
There is not at all comparison between royal enfield and some ugly looking bike(tvs ronin), even they are confuse whethere its tourer or cafe racer and they are not even how to desing rear mud guard aerodynamically and at the end its lower cc bike and short bike and tvs has frustrating history, i dont know why people buy tvs bikes
Ronin look is very confusing either it will be hit or miss. Hunter will get you more resale value than ronin. Ronin is quite comfortable but. It looks very small.
I am quite disappointed with the ground clearance of this bike 😥😥 only 150mm!!! peoples in INDIA buy a bike keeping in mind that he/she will use it for daily purpose as well as for weekend ride . so RE could provide at least ground clearance of 160mm.. Most of the people live in villages or suburban area of INDIA where road conditions are not good as metro cities .So it will become the main reason to not to buy this bike for those who wanted to buy this bike .
Different people... different choices. Some like light weight bike, some heavy... If i had to purchase one, wd hv gove for the low variant of Ronin. Absolute VFM.
yooo prateek bro any update about hero 400 impulse,in other video u replied to one of the commenter u have an update about that few months back,.so any update about that?????
I will buy enfield hunter for 2 reason one it has dual suspension whichs gives a good look and also is comfortable over mono shocks...plus hunter comes with rear tyre of 140 which offers better road grip...I guess ronin will be more of a hit with customers who fall in the age group of 18 to 28 and hunter with the crowd above 30s...
I intend to buy 1 from either of these two. But am confused, my requirements are not just city use as I live far away from city. I need something for highway cruising, I am talking about approx 100-150 kms of highway ride, & city ride of approx 50-60 per travel, & not to forget wet, bad road conditions too.... Which one should I go for, Hunter 350 or Ronin ?
take a test drive of ronin and hunter, youll feel it your self that ronin is fit as per your needs, its light powerful and easy to manuver with 30mm+ ground clearance than hunter.
TVS Ronnin is the Champ here, Hunter is RE bike with different riding style but TVS have really put thoughts at every area putting customer need in time. Everything is modern and fresh on Ronnin, cost cutting on RE and great effort done by TVS is clearly visible. M going for Ronnin...!! No second thoughts..
Wrong comparo... 350vs 250 is not a competition.... One is a roadster ..the other is what even the manufacturer doesn't know.... One is absolutely modern ...other is retro modern ..... Both are for people of different tastes.... Nothing to compare as i said 🙏
Which one will you buy between the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and the TVS Ronin 225? Do let us know your thoughts in the comments below.
I'm still confused between the two, but from where I am the ground clearance will be an issue, so I'm more inclined towards ronin & it's features are also a plus point.
Can we get a proper acceleration test of 0-100kmph please?
Please rply🙏🙏...i have thunderbird 350 2016 model...should i change it with hunter.🙏🙏🙏
@@ThisĪsDeadpool-e1p I don't think that it would be a wise decision.
The Thunderbird is a way too better machine than the Hunter with good ride quality and comfort.
@@rittickjana7333 thanks bro..plz tell me thunderbird is a discontinued bike...isnt it a problem?
Ronin with smaller engine might return better mileage than hunter, anyway I'm getting my 'papa ki pasand' shine...
Same bro 🥲,same
Hmne toh papa ko bullet bike ke itne video dikha diye ab toh bullet hi lenge super splendor ki jagah😁😁
40-50 mileage bhai
Still better yahan to papa Rapido ka app download karne diye.😐
Iss section mein toh kuch alag hi chal raha hai😂😂
Ronin is better.....
But look wise hunter
Confused yr.
Bro to be honest both front and back fender are metal and tank too( did excessive research )and Ronin gives far better mileage then hunter , My bike already gives nearly 40 before 1st service itself.
Things which are better for Ronin
1.Milage
2.More metal parts in body
3.Gtt(glide through traffic) many people miss this point
4.Upside down front suspension
5.Mono shock back suspension
6.Total led setup
7.Lesser service cost of TVS.
8.Trip navigation and Bluetooth connectivity (doesn't comes as accessory)
9.Lesser body weight 160kgs
10.More bass in exhaust note.
I have ridden both,and hunter doesn't has the RE feeling.
Everything is nice on the Hunter, but the ground clearance is surely an issue. This is India and not the US or Japan. The speedbreakers, especially with the weight of the pillion will have you scraping things.
it will not be an issue, i have Thunderbird X with just 135 mm ground clearance.. i did whole ladhakh trip and never faced any issue..
though in city some speed breakers need to be crossed very slowly
wheelbase on Hunter is small, it compensates for low ground clearance
Just 3cm difference though 😀
Not an issue because the rear suspension is stiff on hunter.....this bike is not meant for ride quality.Hence not for hard core touring.
I agree Satya 100%
Mind tells Ronin . But heart says Hunter
Same here🥲
Really 💯
Same problem here 😪😥😢
Buy one of each...! 😁
Both my mind and heart said Ronin and the beauty is in my porch standing bold next to my Duster & has done 1200 kms already
U heard my mind
I know you guys are appealing mostly to your home market, but I can tell you that here in New Zealand, I find your reviews very informative. Thanks for sharing 🤩
If you can make us Indians happy, and convince them then you can convince anyone! XD
Hope the vlogs of all our Indian creators are helping you a lot when it comes to the biking world :)
The ground clearance of 150mm in Hunter is really disappointing
Yes..
My concern as well
Just 3cm difference though 😀
@@zzyuk814 3cm difference with?
@@pranavbhosle2969 ronnin
Even though both have same power figure....since ronin is 20kgs lighter than hunter, it would feel much more pepy...additionally the lower weight permits lower torque figure too which is 7Nm less than a hunter. Also, due to GTT in ronin, it would feel much easier city commuter than hunter
RE engines work with short gearing. It doesn't need gtt. You can easily do 10-12 in 3rd gear.
@@sandypan777 for that u need a wider bandwidth not short gearing, short gearing makes u be on toes every time
I do 10 kmph at times on my rtr 200 and dont press clutch, although 2nd would be a peppy gear to get out faster , 10-12 at 3rd doesnt make me worried about stall
Being a Mechanical engineer and a designer in automotive field, I have following observations.
I was looking for a family bike for city rides mostly with a flat (horizontal seat), circular headlamp and retro-like + premium design (not like 100-150cc bikes).
After exploring lot of bikes, I finalized three options to compare.
1. Honda H'ness 350 CC
2. Royal Enfield Hunter Rebel 350 CC
3. TVS Ronin 225 CC
I test drove all 3 vehicles 2-3 times and following are my observations,
1. Honda H'ness 350 CC -
*Pros* - Nice retro/classic look, Low end torque is good, Seating space for pillion rider is more than other two vehicles.
*Cons* - Bulkier (Box size), Paint quality, Higher cost as compared to other two vehicles
2. Royal Enfield Hunter Rebel 350 CC -
*Pros* - Beautiful Design/Styling/Look, Great color schemes, Turning radius is smaller than Ronin (Less space to turn the vehicle), Reasonable cost.
*Cons* - The biggest issue (design flaw) is positioning of foot rest (pegs), just below the sitting position. This makes it difficult to keep your feet on ground while you are at signal or in slow moving traffic. Foot rest (pegs) keep touching your legs and is very uncomfortable.
Another point is that seat on rear end tapers downward and seating space for pillion rider being less, pillion rider tend to move back and when you accelerate, pillion may feel like toppling/falling down at back side. So this is not safe and hence, back rest is MUST.
Handle bar positioned in such a way that you need to keep your hands stretched straight all the times which is not a comfortable sitting posture.
Low end torque/performance (2 & 3 gear) is sluggish due to bigger engine. (Not as good as smaller capacity bikes)
3. TVS Ronin 225 CC -
*Pros* - Semi-retro look with circular headlamp, Driveability and Performance is superb.
Handle bar position is very good for comfortable sitting posture with hands slightly bent in elbows. Very easy to handle in traffic.
*Cons* - Very bad design/aesthetics of fuel tank (some odd shape), Color schemes are odd (not impressive), Turning radius is higher than Hunter (Needs larger space to turn the vehicle). Cost is on higher side for lower CC as compared to Hunter (mainly due to features).
Overall, none of them is meeting my requirements (as mentioned above) and hence, I decided to wait for Kawasaki W175 or Yamaha XSR or Improved version of Royal Enfield Hunter.
All the best!
Regards, Jayesh Shimpi
I would say that you should wait till the bajaj & triumph collab bike hits the market and then compare all of them together, so that at the end of the day you won't feel disappointed.
Thank you sir
I also have the same feeling bro, still waiting for Yamaha XSR 155, I hope they launch it soon considering the demand for retro segment motorcycles in India now............ Bajaj x Triumph design looks good (spy shot images) but not sure about the ride quality and price.............
Totally agree with you on Ronin's aesthetics. It looks confusing. I faced the footpegs problem as well when I test-rode the Hunter 350, 180 kgs of weight hitting my shins was not a pleasurable experience lol.
I also test-rode the Hness 350. The newer version has better seats and feels more comfortable.
Did you finalize your bike yet? I will buy a bike by 1st week of May'23 and hopefully make my decision by then.
@@rishabhanand01 Finally I felt that 350cc is basically not something which I'll enjoy but I'll be unnecessarily driving & handling a higher box size & higher weight...
Then I shifted downward and bought new Bajaj CT125X...it has got a circular headlamp, flat & long seat (for family/kids) and a mini-srambler like look with enhanced sturdiness...so basically meeting all my requirements.
I am OK with this 125x than any of 350cc models I tried. Best luck!
I love the TVS Ronin launch it here in the Philippines 😍
I bought the Ronin, the Hunter was yet to be launched and the prelaunch price was supposed to be higher. Now with this killer pricing they seem to have knocked Ronin a solid punch. Having said that I am going out on a limb and saying that the overall cost of ownership may tip it in favour of the Ronin.
Another great video.
I like the look of the Hunter!!
TVS's headlight is cool! 👍👍
Usd also
I got my Ronin past Friday and it's soo awesome.. with lot of features and all. My only issue is every variant of Ronin has only 2color options. I got the grey one but it would have been nice if we get all the available color options in every variant. Happy riding everyone
very good point raised, hope TVS does bring some cool/fun colours urgently...
Congrats...👍🏻
How is the fit n finish quality of the side panel? Yesterday I took a test ride and the bike's side panel didn't feel solid
@@naveraphael7055 thanks
@@nilajitsinha6561 that's a plastic pannel.inside we can take a look at the battery,i think it's because to reduce the overall weight of the bike,it's just 160kg for a bike looks both like a scrambler and cruiser. It doesn't bother me that much but there are other's who think it would have been better if that's a metal frame. Maybe soon they will provide an metal frame side pannel accessory....
Ronin has advantage of Power to weight ratio , 20 Kg lighter than Hunter
If Hunter had monoshock suspension at back, then it might have increased ride quality
Certainly would have increased the looks too. That dual shock was what out me off from the yezdi scrambler too
Everything is perfect in hunter except the most imp part which could change anyone's mind within seconds to consider it is its ground clearance, 150 is damn to low for a cruiser like this
Biggest disappointment
what's the matter, ronin is not available everywhere. very disappointed😞
True. In capital of odisha it will come after 2 months. Not a single show piece is also there.
@@bm7062 bro its already available u can check out in tvs showrooms in patia and khandagiri.
@@undeademper0ryt49 it's not like that, ronin is available only in special tvs showrooms with rr310, same like honda bigwings.
@@nitinbhowate9690 yes i bought it from patia showroom already... go in the morning for test drive.
4valve head , oil cooler , 20 kilo weight advantage , slipper clutch , USD fork , connected tech, LEDs , 30mm extra ground clearance.
Ronin is an absolute deal unless you are a RE fanboy !
Also cheaper service cost
I have seen your comment in other channel 😆😆. Well Paid😆😆
@@TusharVarma others channel's have the same content! So what's the issue?
@@TusharVarma Is there any fake detail in the list? No... So, even if paid, it is not an issue, unlike the propaganda of some political parties through their fake IDs.
@@ALIYYILA your Id looks very genuine.
TVS needs to explore markets outside India. There is definitely a demand for bikes like these.
Thanks for the in detailed review,
I have purchased the Ronin 225 as it is way too comfortable and features rich machine than the Hunter 350 which also delivers a handsome city mileage than the RE 😇
Can you do that long drive with Ronin 225. Like ladak
@@karunakarb2919 we can as it has a strong in built chasis which is a full metal body and the best in class premium tyres from TVS.
The Hunter hardly has an experience of a RE machine like that of the Classic 350 or the Meteor
Thanks for your information
Any problems or negatives you see in Ronin?
@@thelastsamuraiRonin No problems as of now, will update you if I get one.
As of now it is a complete all in one cruser bike which is fun to ride in the city as well as in the highway with no vibrations and fully refined engine.
You get every possible feature in this light weight cruser 😇
Thanks for the comparision. My favourite ist the hunter 350, just for its looks and specs: It seems to be more solid, more durable, more worthy...
I took test ride of both the bikes. Initially i was inclined towards hunter as i am a huge RE fanboy but seeing the practicality of everything i feel Ronin is
best value for money for 95% of consumers who are going to use it as a daily commuter and weekend rides.
Top speed 135+ ,
Glide through traffic feature,
very nimble to manuaver in day to day traffic,
super comfort ,
best riding posture ,
engine refinement ,
smooth gear box
power to weight ratio is better than hunter so in real world it delivers
slipper assist clutch
Showa USD forks
LEDs all around
Bass heavy exhaust note
and best of all 40+ milage that will pay dividend in long run.
In a nutshell Ronin is complete bike whereas Hunter feels like a downgraded 350 classic.
Well said bro ✌🏻
How many times will u copy paste the same thing bro?
@@Sarthak1710 its been 4 times , i will post it in 10 videos if that is ok with you my lord 😂🤌🏻
ronin vs hunter search kiya and first video
Service cost is more for RE
Tvs service cost especially good or bad considered RE
Ronin 🔥🔥
I will choose Ronin if hunter we have to hang on to royalEnfield for after sales ,poor service from RE
Even TVS has poor service after sales.
A down-to-earth review, clearly delivered, no theatricals. Thanks! 🌈🦉
PS: What are the prices in £££ sterling?
Love the looks of Hunter but i think ronin can be ride in any road conditions
RE service Quality ?????
Love from andhra Pradesh
RE has more haters than lovers... But at the end of the Year They sold More bikes than total of the others... Fact 👍
😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂
Aesthetically, Ronin looks weaker!
In what?
I think the Ronin fuel tank is very odd and should have been retro tank like in RE.
I'm in for #ronin. In fact, one of my friend purchased the Ronin and I really liked the bike.
Are they feeling any heat issue from radiator?
We will buy TVs Ronin because it have a most features then hunter 350 and looks good
For me Ronin makes much more sense.... The only thing going for Hunter is that 350cc engine and Brand name....
Same here i was also thinking dat hunter is so hype coz of brand name RE...but ronin is better
RE Hunter is good, but I bought Ronin which is VFM with refined engine, loaded features and build quality fit & finished. I did completed 780 kms till now and i didn't any issues yet.
Ok.
Bro any heating issue or vibration? What is current mileage
@@barathkumar4981 I haven't found any. Approx 40 kmpl. I am going to do mileage test & share post 1st service.
Ronin give 42-45 kmpl with so many features. Range for cruising is 600 km on a single tank! Baat khatam. Why should we buy a clunky bike with 1960's engine?
Perfect review you are the only one who said to buy RONIN because its worth the price and a lot better bike
Hunter looks budget bike while Ronin gives premium feeling
Hunter is budget segment of RE but rohin is premium model of TVs , we should go for premium one with same price 😜
Today i have test rided both and decided to take Ronin bescause of milege and suspension system
I Will upload video soon
ruclips.net/video/WQzmdBLJ4VM/видео.html
I purchased TVS ronin
TVS is the only brand among the big 4 brands that actually does some Innovation!
Others just Ctrl C Ctrl V
Why hunter 350 vs Ronin225? The real battle should be between hunter350 vs jawa 42 2.1
Ronin everytime over that Hunter inward bend at legs
It's like comparing a Porsche to a Tesla. Yes the Tesla has more power, more torque, more features, less acceleration time, but the riding and owning experience of a Porsche is far better than a Tesla. So yeah, Ronin looks tacky. Hunter definitely.
foe me, both looks incomplete hope bajaj will come up with complete package.
Tujhe chahiye kya wo decide kar pehle 😅
@@paragsande 250 cc scrambler at this price point
I will go with java42,the powerful in segment
Ronin gud mileage than Hunter
Hunter : Cute
Ronin : Sexy
I purchased Ronin. Amazing bike. Very easy to ride. Looks fresh and different from same old looks of re.
Congratulations
Do u feel any heat issues?
Milage n sevice cost bro
These small bikes, I want a proper cruiser man, like Indian Motorcycle, Was expecting RE will launch meteor plus, Meteor too don't have much seating space for passenger. Need seating space along with power only then will be able to enjoy the ride. Bajaj avenger might be a good choice but it too got issues.
Lowest Mileage🤦♀️, Grould Clearance🤦♀️Permanent Heavy Liabilities🙆due to Heavy Weight Metal Body, Luggage Space missing, Fuel Tank=>5Ltr, Power=>100cc, Useless Battery operated accessories, Self start, DRL, halogen bulbs, disc brakes, ABS, tubeless, mobile charger, Bluetooth, digital meter etc.. means Heavy Weight=Lowest Mileage🤦♀️= Permanent Heavy Liabilities🙆
Hunter ground clearance is a big concern especially when a pillion above 80 or 90 Kgs sit behind. I feel it would hit speed breakers in such a case. All other cons are kind of manageable I feel.
All royal enfields from 2017 have problems with electrical wires. Bikes costing 2,00,000 have faulty wires , they fail after 2 or 3 years. Get a life royal enfield....
Please dont buy RE!!
All royal enfields from 2017 have problems with electrical wires. Bikes costing 2,00,000 have faulty wires , they fail after 2 or 3 years. Get a life royal enfield....
Please dont buy RE!!
Either buy Ronin or go for RE Meteor. Hunter is not worth the money.
I was obsessed with Ronin when it came out, But after that when hunter got introduced I changed my mind!!. Yes, Ronin is better when it comes to it's key features, like glide through, slipper clutch, USD forks etc. which the hunter doesn't have. But personally I think these features are not a deal breaker for me.
1) Slipper clutch for Ronin is exactly where hunter lacks, hunter with a tighter clutch is a concern. I believe this problem can be solved with a hydraulic clutch conversion's which are popular in 650 twins.
2) USD forks are always better but with this segment, it is not very important.
I think hunter is a better choice with it's unique roadster type design and road presence which makes it a one of a kind motorcycle like that of a triumph. Also this bike's got a great potential for future modification's and bolt on accessories which is awesome if you are an enthusiast. Right now my favourite picks of hunter accessories would be tail tidy, bar end mirrors and seat if needed. Overall I think hunter with it's unique character would be a great choice over Ronin.
Test driving both and picking one that fits your taste is always the best way to go.
Slipper clutch is very convenient and usd forks are way better than regular one’s on hunter. Both these make a huge difference in riding. So take test rides on both
Slipper clutch makes a huge difference when you are a daily commuter and ride mostly in the city.
Till date we don't have a machine like Ronin in Indian two wheeler market which would offer you so much at a reasonable cost.
*225cc Liquid + Oiled Cooled Engine.
*Power of 20.4 PS and with 19.6 NM of torque with a descent city mileage.
*Slipper assist clutch with Adjustable brake and clutch levers.
*GTT Technology
*Smart Connect feature with turn by turn navigation
*Fully digital instrument
cluster
*Upside Down premium USD front folks with pre load adjustment.
*Cruising speed of 130 kmph with no vibrations.
*Premium roadblock tyres from TVS for stability and better road grip.
*Dual Channel ABS with riding modes.
*Full LED light set up with LED DRLs and LED indicators.
Ride a bike with usd suspension and mono shock one. It's way more comfortable
@@ayushpathania5500 👍
Just hope The Royal Enfield are doing well with their service. God bless
Why do most Indian designed bikes look God aweful? Royal Enfield looks soo good meanwhile TVS looks like Chinese offbrand product a
Royal Enfield hunter 350 dapper grey ❤️
Any TVS vehicle, they use 4th grade metal, so never compare between Royal Enfield with such lowest class TVS
There is not at all comparison between royal enfield and some ugly looking bike(tvs ronin), even they are confuse whethere its tourer or cafe racer and they are not even how to desing rear mud guard aerodynamically and at the end its lower cc bike and short bike and tvs has frustrating history, i dont know why people buy tvs bikes
Ronin look is very confusing either it will be hit or miss.
Hunter will get you more resale value than ronin.
Ronin is quite comfortable but. It looks very small.
✔🌷Good Video Brother. =Which Bike You Will Buy & Put Your Hard Earned Money On??🌷✔
Ronin it was having better features
Ok. But what about looks?
@@BikeWaleOfficial look was different prospective .... for different ... Person... As per econmical and value for money Ronin was better way above
which have better build quality..?
Both are on par. Stay tuned, our detailed real world comparison will be live in a week or two.
RE Ki service thodi costly hai, TVS ke muqable
I am quite disappointed with the ground clearance of this bike 😥😥 only 150mm!!! peoples in INDIA buy a bike keeping in mind that he/she will use it for daily purpose as well as for weekend ride . so RE could provide at least ground clearance of 160mm.. Most of the people live in villages or suburban area of INDIA where road conditions are not good as metro cities .So it will become the main reason to not to buy this bike for those who wanted to buy this bike .
Purchased royal Enfield hunter 350 dapper Grey
I already purchased tvs ronin and i m in love this bike.
Do u feel any heat issues?
Royal Enfield has better after market value than TVS
lack of classicism in TVS Ronin. It looks like Vikrant 2.0
Different people... different choices. Some like light weight bike, some heavy...
If i had to purchase one, wd hv gove for the low variant of Ronin. Absolute VFM.
I'm going with Ronin!!
After Watching All The Comparisons I'm Gonna Buy Honda CB 125R 😅
Par Saale Launch Hi Nahi Kar Rahe India Me 🤬🤬
Sir please rly hunter 350 or cb honda 350??
yooo prateek bro any update about hero 400 impulse,in other video u replied to one of the commenter u have an update about that few months back,.so any update about that?????
Still looks wise xsr wud beat all these but if i have t go between one of these two, Enfield all d way
TVS navi
Royal Enfield hunter....... I purchased
can you tell me which bike has a less maintainces cost
Ronin is an Engineered Bike
Hunter is a Downsized Bike
I will buy enfield hunter for 2 reason one it has dual suspension whichs gives a good look and also is comfortable over mono shocks...plus hunter comes with rear tyre of 140 which offers better road grip...I guess ronin will be more of a hit with customers who fall in the age group of 18 to 28 and hunter with the crowd above 30s...
The ex-showroom price differences of these top spec bikes is 2000. Then, how the on-road price will get differed as 8,000?
Sir! I am bike lover. I would like to see a comparison between TVS Ronin and Yamaha FZ25 in the future.
ground clearance, suspension are the main drawback of hunter and milege also...
No replacement for displacement
i have driven the Hunter, it gives the best comfortable ride. i enjoyed lot when i drives this , so people plz go with hunter
❤🔥
if someone made bike with looks of Hunter and performance & dynamics of Ronin then I would have bought it. so wait continues.....
Tu khud banale....
@@priyobratasaha1308 😂😂, Ek ki already hai par launch nahi kar rahe hai #xsr. Dursre bana rahe hai per kab tak launch hogi pata nahi #street_375. 🌚🌚
I think you should wait for the new bike from Bajaj-trimph partnership.
@@kishoredeb3538 that's what I'm waiting for. hope it priced sensibly.
Wrong comparison..it could have been with Honda 350rs
No doubts Ronin is winner in all the way
I intend to buy 1 from either of these two.
But am confused, my requirements are not just city use as I live far away from city.
I need something for highway cruising, I am talking about approx 100-150 kms of highway ride, & city ride of approx 50-60 per travel, & not to forget wet, bad road conditions too....
Which one should I go for,
Hunter 350 or Ronin ?
take a test drive of ronin and hunter, youll feel it your self that ronin is fit as per your needs, its light powerful and easy to manuver with 30mm+ ground clearance than hunter.
Between jawa perak, jawa 42 and hunter which is better for long term
Not both of them, I'm waiting for upcoming Hero Xpulse 300 & Bajaj Truimp Scrambler............please make a video on the both upcoming bikes.........
TVS Ronnin is the Champ here, Hunter is RE bike with different riding style but TVS have really put thoughts at every area putting customer need in time.
Everything is modern and fresh on Ronnin, cost cutting on RE and great effort done by TVS is clearly visible.
M going for Ronnin...!! No second thoughts..
why Ronin is 8K more having 2K difference in exshowroom prices
Wrong comparo... 350vs 250 is not a competition.... One is a roadster ..the other is what even the manufacturer doesn't know.... One is absolutely modern ...other is retro modern ..... Both are for people of different tastes.... Nothing to compare as i said 🙏
A hunter 500 with 30 to 35 HP, that is what I am waiting for. Must have the same weight. Because the don't sell TVS in Europe.