This is really not funny at all. Why wouldn't you also make a video on the big German f*ckery that Siemens had in Belgium, in their own country, and how the Venture cars were two years late. Or you could talk about Bombardier messing up the Elizabeth line, CAF sending Sydney's L1 light rail line into chaos, and the list goes on. Why does Alstom systematically have to be targeted nowadays. Believe it or not, Siemens has probably caused just as much harm as Alstom to many countries our there. Bring us facts rather than ranting endlessly about one manufacturer in particular. Plus, the fault isn't Alstom's, it's their management team. Some of the finest rail engineers out there are French. If the French were really that bad, then how come German trains are less reliable, and let's not even talk about American trains.
@@MilwaukeeF40C That's not really true. There are plenty of master planned cities that didn't destroy their urban cores for car infrastructure. Yes, almost every city in the world has allowed the car to dominate, but that's not the fault of Central planners, and in many ways the only way to fix the problem is through central planning today.
Economic regulation of railroads, road subsidies, property taxes, and government backed real estate mortgage financing are all central planning. It dominates.
Here in Germany, when Bombardier was still manufacturing trains in Kassel, we had a saying: “God protect us from winds and storm and from locomotives with Kassel as their dorm.” (Gott schütze uns vor Sturm und Wind und vor Loks die aus Kassel sind.)
I will never understand people who thought that the two companies merging would solve anything. Two rocks that don't float on their own won't magically become buoyant after you glue them together.
@@scanida5070Alstom made them even worse. Our locomotives are from Kassel and were great when Bombardier built them. Now that Alstom built the remaining ones, they always have issues.
You know what pisses me off about this is that they had problems with the first group of Acelas they bought so they went out and did the same thing again.
Alstom can never do anything right these days. And the fact that they bought Bombardier with their insane problems only makes things worse. God, help us, in other words.
@@wta1518 I don't know that Alstom will actually fall into its component pieces. I think the French government will bail them out again to avoid an embarrassing bankruptcy. But yeah, all the current orders are ... they're not ok, to put it mildly.
You can literally blame the Liberal Government of Canada for that. They sold off most of the companies assets at Bombardier for billions in profits since they love corporations. Now Alstom took over everything and lo and behold look at Ottawa’s transit system mess. As a Canadian I apologize for our government selling Bombardier. We’re sorry!
It seems like the majority of Bombardier train orders here in Germany in the past were either massively delayed or the trains had issues with brakes/wheels/coupling systems or both... We have Bombardier talents in Schleswig-Holstein state and they are actually pretty new, but they get replaced by 2028 already. I was shocked when I found out, but turns out these current Bombardier trains are so new because they entered service with massive delay
I'm just glad that this means we're more likely to see a variant of a Siemens Velaro with Brightline West and/or CAHSR. While I'd love to see a Velaro Novo, a Velaro D/ICE 3 Neo would be great as well.
I imagine Brightline West will use the same rolling stock Brightline does in Florida, if both services are run by the same or affiliated companies. California might end up going with a Shinkansen with its top speed requirements.
@@portcybertryx222 Let's face it, they won't have even 10% of the Brightline West track at 150+ mph. They won't get HSR trainsets for that route. It makes zero sense. With zero actual HSR track miles on the California side (2/3 of the route) and most of the Nevada side under 125 mph, there is no reason to get anything faster than the Charger + Venture sets that they're already intimately familiar with. You just watch how they switch their marketing to Charger Es in a couple of years. This would allow them to run on non-electrified track into Union Station and actually make better use of their mostly highER speed rail highway median alignment.
@@TohaBgood2 electric trains are faster, more reliable, need less maintenance, accelerate faster, are much quieter, and pay for themselves in fuel saving and maintenance costs in a few years
I'll play devil's advocate: When Amtrak ordered LRCs from MLW (whci got bought by Bombardier before deliveries), it insisted on changing amny compinents. End result: the Amtrak version of LRCs was even more reliable because not designed/engineered for those components. When Amtrak ordered the heavy steel Acellas, it also stipulated certain components, notably for washroom automatic doors etc. They ended up being highly unreliable but it was the manufacturer that got the bad reputation. (though the faulty structural items was Bobardier's fault). But this is what happens when USA rules require every train be a custom untested model with untested "made in USA" components. And right now, with the FRA reluctantly once again allowing aluminium trains, instead of ordering a real TGV trainset (single deck) with proven TGV components, it ordered a mixture of TGV-M (Avelia horizon) locos downgraded to USA statndardsm and Pendolino coaches, not only downgraded to USA stadards but also with changed tilting tech to use GPS as predictive tilting, and both, of course need to meet "made in USA" so many untested components. Had Amtrak bought used single deck TGVs from SNCF, the conversion to US power and replacing the TVM signaling with the ACSES would have taken less time and cost way less money. It was Amtrak that asked for tilting technology AND a TGV, two items that cannot be mixed since TGvs are true high speed trains that run on tracks that are banked and don't have complex banking system that make cars heavier (axle load is very important on jacobs bogie trains). Why did Amtrak insist on tilting tech? Since it owns the corridor, how come it can't bank its own tracks properly? About the only "made in USA" trains that got multiple orders are the current heavy steel Siemens "Venture" which were imported/downgraded older Viaggios. The process is costly since the cars need to be re-engineered to meet FRA standard and "buy America" standards so Siemens isn't about to import the new Viagios that are aluminium and much lighter since that would cost too much to re-engineer and get FRA certification. So the end result is that every new train purchased in USA (and Canada) since "made in USA" was enforced are from practical point of view , totally new and untested trains so every order has a lot of teething problems because Amtrak and others are not allowed to buy trains that have proven reliability in europe. When governments are more concerned with the photo op announcements (announcing local jobs, local content etc) than actually offering the service, then expect unreliable equipment because their photo op requirements are incompatible with getting equipment that works ASAP. For all the problems with the CDPQ REM in Montréal, at least they avoided this and bought off-the shelf Indian version of the Metropolis metros (the cheaper heavy steel version) and did not specily any "made in Canada" requirements so they are fitted with the compenents the model was originally designed for.
My local rail operator (UK's South Western Railway) ordered 90 Class 701 EMUs from Alsthom (Aventra series). They were meant to go into service in mid-2019. Here we are in 2023 and they are supposedly going to enter service by December (I'll believe it when I see it). So many issues. Looks like they f*cked us too.
The French railways learned that infrastructure beats technology. The trains are outdated in 10 years, the laser straight track is irreplaceable. Result: build great rail beds and buy cheap trains. Not their fault the rest of us just get the cheap trains.
Yeah... then why is Alsom having issues all over the place and even with non-train contracts? I'm sorry, but this opinion, no matter how much Alstom fanboys want it to be true, just doesn't jive with reality.
@@RTSRafnex2 Well, yes, but now Bombardier and Alstom have combined their epic shittiness to make a giant supershitty rail manufacturer. This way neither gets dragged behind the shed and dealt with. Both get to continue their sorry existence!
Sounds similar to what happened to our IC4 trains in Denmark - we got screwed by the Italians. Somehow, one of the trains ended up in Libya, as a gift to Muammar Gaddafi. That's a story I want to hear firsthand accounts from.
This could have worked for Brightline west too since they are considering buying the Avelia liberty. Update: Alston trying to block waiver so brightoine west basically has to buy from Alston Also shame this video is probably demonitized, it’s so great, although it wouldn't be great if you got it anywhere near monitzation acceptibilty.
Over here in Europe, Alstom seems to make excellent hardware, but their software is just utterly crap. Like, seriously. It's horrendous. It's ready 2 years after planned, and even then it takes 2 years further before it's actually working in a satisfactory manner. Here in Denmark their project of updating the signalling systems in East Denmark is constantly running behind schedule and has huge issues each time a new line is converted, while in West Denmark (where it's being done by Thales and Strukton) there are no issues at all and everything is proceeding according to plan.
Lol, then why did Siemens have zero issues with this with their ALC-42s? And why is Alstom having massive issues with their train contracts elsewhere? No bud, this is Alstom through and through. They messed up, again. Just like they always do.
They did for literally everything else. But just couldn't resist with the tilting trains. The Siemens alternative was just not there yet. Alstom swore that theirs was so here we are...
You know you could also do this for Siemens because the SC44s and ALC42s have been having a lot of issues lately and the Venture Cars are already starting to fall apart 2 atleast the Midwest ones are
This is amazing. The sad thing is once you factor in all the areas the Acela is not allowed to go full speed it is only something like 20 minutes faster than the regular trains. Acela is popular because comfy seats, better food and less poor people. You could do all of that on a regular train for a lot less.
If only there was a reliable tiling (almost) high speed train that had been tested in service since around 2000... Yeah, current series only does 145mph, but asking nicely could probably get a 160mph model built in Sacramento. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICE_T
The diesel version had so many problems they pulled them from service. The electric ones are still going strong, as far as I know. 71 built, 70 still in service. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intercity_Express @@Nyatascha4510
You have a point there so you are saying Amtrak is better off ordering ICE-T DB Baureihe 411 415 the ones that run on Dresden Frankfurt am Main Flughafen Wiesbaden Hbf route
Hey alan should us HS lines be managed by joint venture between the us govt. and the private corporations in their respective areas with 50/50 cost & profit sharing so that they approve construction faster,🤔🤔🤔
I can't find any point in this video because you seem more interested in colorful words. What does France have to do with Amtrak,, perhaps you could enlighten us.
Alstom Transportation The Supplier of these Shit new High Speed Train Sets For Amtrak is a French Company with their Headquarters in Saint-Ouen-Sur-Seine
![State of Play | September 24, 2024 [ENGLISH]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/fVs0suPHAX8/mqdefault.jpg)
Yes we actually transferred the edit onto a VHS and back for the effect
I fucking knew it!!
And sound too?
@@femboichik yup, that's why there's some popping noises near the end
This is really not funny at all. Why wouldn't you also make a video on the big German f*ckery that Siemens had in Belgium, in their own country, and how the Venture cars were two years late. Or you could talk about Bombardier messing up the Elizabeth line, CAF sending Sydney's L1 light rail line into chaos, and the list goes on. Why does Alstom systematically have to be targeted nowadays. Believe it or not, Siemens has probably caused just as much harm as Alstom to many countries our there. Bring us facts rather than ranting endlessly about one manufacturer in particular. Plus, the fault isn't Alstom's, it's their management team. Some of the finest rail engineers out there are French. If the French were really that bad, then how come German trains are less reliable, and let's not even talk about American trains.
That's dedication, love it
Setting playback speed to 1.25x speed makes it nearly perfectly align with the original video's speed
? It’s not slowed down.
Exactly
1.15x speed is more accurate, personally.
@@mbta1000 1x feels perfectly normal to me
i like 1.5x
If you can piss straight up on the catenary and not get electrocuted you get no down payment!
We need more of this shitposting in the urbanist space, lol.
fu
American rail club has done a few
Pop urbanists are part of the problem. Central planning caused most transportation and land use messes in the first place.
@@MilwaukeeF40C That's not really true. There are plenty of master planned cities that didn't destroy their urban cores for car infrastructure. Yes, almost every city in the world has allowed the car to dominate, but that's not the fault of Central planners, and in many ways the only way to fix the problem is through central planning today.
Economic regulation of railroads, road subsidies, property taxes, and government backed real estate mortgage financing are all central planning. It dominates.
AHAHAHAHAHA
This is basically is reverse ad for Siemens and Stadler
Whose trains actually work!
@@centralillinoisrailpix453yep quite well In fact the SC-44 and KISS are both fine products
@@centralillinoisrailpix453 except for the ones Amtrak purchased...
@@centralillinoisrailpix453 Excuse moi, but who said that trains need to actually work? That's ridiculeuse!
@@TohaBgood2 I find it makes for somewhat interesting video when the trains are actually present though.
Alstom had its own issues, but now they they've bought out Bombardier, they've inherited _their_ issues too.
Here in Germany, when Bombardier was still manufacturing trains in Kassel, we had a saying:
“God protect us from winds and storm and from locomotives with Kassel as their dorm.”
(Gott schütze uns vor Sturm und Wind und vor Loks die aus Kassel sind.)
@@scanida5070very good mediation. 1+
I will never understand people who thought that the two companies merging would solve anything. Two rocks that don't float on their own won't magically become buoyant after you glue them together.
@@scanida5070Alstom made them even worse. Our locomotives are from Kassel and were great when Bombardier built them. Now that Alstom built the remaining ones, they always have issues.
I actually bought Alstom stock hoping Stadler or Hyundai Rotem would end their suffering and buy them. I didn't think this through!
Remember when the US forcibly took control of Alstom energy and French nuclear powerplants maintenance? That's karmic justice 😂.
But the French deserve it because they're French.
@@wta1518😂😐
@@wta1518 And now they're forcibly buying it back from us ...
What? Did the US just buy a private company in France or was it a special government thing?
Okay what is going on in France that is making everyone hate it, I don't understand
Alan’s voice is so perfect to do a voice over for this meme
You know what pisses me off about this is that they had problems with the first group of Acelas they bought so they went out and did the same thing again.
Alstom can never do anything right these days. And the fact that they bought Bombardier with their insane problems only makes things worse. God, help us, in other words.
@@TohaBgood2 We need to get Pullman and Budd back from them.
@@wta1518 I don't know that Alstom will actually fall into its component pieces. I think the French government will bail them out again to avoid an embarrassing bankruptcy.
But yeah, all the current orders are ... they're not ok, to put it mildly.
This and THE MILWAUKEE ROAD version are masterpieces
I hunted down The Milwaukee Road version, and that shit wad beyond funny.
it's really paying off how Alstom bought Bombardier to get a hand on their expertise in making trains that don't fit the loading gauge and catch fire
You can literally blame the Liberal Government of Canada for that. They sold off most of the companies assets at Bombardier for billions in profits since they love corporations. Now Alstom took over everything and lo and behold look at Ottawa’s transit system mess. As a Canadian I apologize for our government selling Bombardier. We’re sorry!
It seems like the majority of Bombardier train orders here in Germany in the past were either massively delayed or the trains had issues with brakes/wheels/coupling systems or both... We have Bombardier talents in Schleswig-Holstein state and they are actually pretty new, but they get replaced by 2028 already. I was shocked when I found out, but turns out these current Bombardier trains are so new because they entered service with massive delay
It goes well with Alstom's inability to make trains that won't fit in their god damn train stations
I'm just glad that this means we're more likely to see a variant of a Siemens Velaro with Brightline West and/or CAHSR. While I'd love to see a Velaro Novo, a Velaro D/ICE 3 Neo would be great as well.
Well Siemens has been using the Novo in their bid concepts
I imagine Brightline West will use the same rolling stock Brightline does in Florida, if both services are run by the same or affiliated companies. California might end up going with a Shinkansen with its top speed requirements.
@@grahamturner2640Brightline west is going to be electrified so it will be a different rolling stock.
@@portcybertryx222 Let's face it, they won't have even 10% of the Brightline West track at 150+ mph. They won't get HSR trainsets for that route. It makes zero sense. With zero actual HSR track miles on the California side (2/3 of the route) and most of the Nevada side under 125 mph, there is no reason to get anything faster than the Charger + Venture sets that they're already intimately familiar with.
You just watch how they switch their marketing to Charger Es in a couple of years. This would allow them to run on non-electrified track into Union Station and actually make better use of their mostly highER speed rail highway median alignment.
@@TohaBgood2 electric trains are faster, more reliable, need less maintenance, accelerate faster, are much quieter, and pay for themselves in fuel saving and maintenance costs in a few years
You're such a madlad for transferring this shitpost onto a VHS and back just to establish the effect. Well done sir!
I'll play devil's advocate:
When Amtrak ordered LRCs from MLW (whci got bought by Bombardier before deliveries), it insisted on changing amny compinents. End result: the Amtrak version of LRCs was even more reliable because not designed/engineered for those components.
When Amtrak ordered the heavy steel Acellas, it also stipulated certain components, notably for washroom automatic doors etc. They ended up being highly unreliable but it was the manufacturer that got the bad reputation. (though the faulty structural items was Bobardier's fault). But this is what happens when USA rules require every train be a custom untested model with untested "made in USA" components.
And right now, with the FRA reluctantly once again allowing aluminium trains, instead of ordering a real TGV trainset (single deck) with proven TGV components, it ordered a mixture of TGV-M (Avelia horizon) locos downgraded to USA statndardsm and Pendolino coaches, not only downgraded to USA stadards but also with changed tilting tech to use GPS as predictive tilting, and both, of course need to meet "made in USA" so many untested components. Had Amtrak bought used single deck TGVs from SNCF, the conversion to US power and replacing the TVM signaling with the ACSES would have taken less time and cost way less money. It was Amtrak that asked for tilting technology AND a TGV, two items that cannot be mixed since TGvs are true high speed trains that run on tracks that are banked and don't have complex banking system that make cars heavier (axle load is very important on jacobs bogie trains). Why did Amtrak insist on tilting tech? Since it owns the corridor, how come it can't bank its own tracks properly?
About the only "made in USA" trains that got multiple orders are the current heavy steel Siemens "Venture" which were imported/downgraded older Viaggios. The process is costly since the cars need to be re-engineered to meet FRA standard and "buy America" standards so Siemens isn't about to import the new Viagios that are aluminium and much lighter since that would cost too much to re-engineer and get FRA certification.
So the end result is that every new train purchased in USA (and Canada) since "made in USA" was enforced are from practical point of view , totally new and untested trains so every order has a lot of teething problems because Amtrak and others are not allowed to buy trains that have proven reliability in europe.
When governments are more concerned with the photo op announcements (announcing local jobs, local content etc) than actually offering the service, then expect unreliable equipment because their photo op requirements are incompatible with getting equipment that works ASAP. For all the problems with the CDPQ REM in Montréal, at least they avoided this and bought off-the shelf Indian version of the Metropolis metros (the cheaper heavy steel version) and did not specily any "made in Canada" requirements so they are fitted with the compenents the model was originally designed for.
My local rail operator (UK's South Western Railway) ordered 90 Class 701 EMUs from Alsthom (Aventra series). They were meant to go into service in mid-2019. Here we are in 2023 and they are supposedly going to enter service by December (I'll believe it when I see it). So many issues. Looks like they f*cked us too.
tbf they were Bombardier till 2021, who also had a lot of issues with the Crossrail trains and the signalling
@@ce1834 Yeah, like I said, Alstom had issues on its own, but now it's got Bombardier's issues on top of that.
I heard operators around the world have been having problems with Alstom products
I seem to recall some of the other Aventras entering service well over a year late as well, as well as many others still not being ready
I mean IDK the Greater Anglia Aventras seem OK actually I've not noticed too many issues and they're my local services
This fits perfectly with the theme of the original ad! Challenge Tilting seems like it would be quite the experience for an Acela train!
The French railways learned that infrastructure beats technology. The trains are outdated in 10 years, the laser straight track is irreplaceable. Result: build great rail beds and buy cheap trains. Not their fault the rest of us just get the cheap trains.
Yeah... then why is Alsom having issues all over the place and even with non-train contracts? I'm sorry, but this opinion, no matter how much Alstom fanboys want it to be true, just doesn't jive with reality.
time traveller: *breaks a stick*
the timeline:
THEY PARODIED BIG BILL HELL
this is what happens when public transport equipment manufacturers cannibalise themselves with mergers & acquisition.
RIP Bombardier / Adtranz
more like good riddance Bombardier...
@@RTSRafnex2 Well, yes, but now Bombardier and Alstom have combined their epic shittiness to make a giant supershitty rail manufacturer. This way neither gets dragged behind the shed and dealt with. Both get to continue their sorry existence!
LMFAO
Meanwhile Hitachi is just sitting there being train chads
challenge tilting is actually making it tilt more than 6 degrees and not leaking hydraulic fluid
Sounds similar to what happened to our IC4 trains in Denmark - we got screwed by the Italians.
Somehow, one of the trains ended up in Libya, as a gift to Muammar Gaddafi. That's a story I want to hear firsthand accounts from.
When he said “it better not bounce or you’re a dead mfer “you should’ve used tank footage from “triumph of the will”
I'm no rail expert, but as an NJT rider, I feel this. Although we're more about impaling our cars with steel beams.
Masterpiece
fu
This is the Waluigi of Big Bill Hell's ads.
High speed failure, explained in the 80s VHS cockmercial.
This could have worked for Brightline west too since they are considering buying the Avelia liberty.
Update: Alston trying to block waiver so brightoine west basically has to buy from Alston
Also shame this video is probably demonitized, it’s so great, although it wouldn't be great if you got it anywhere near monitzation acceptibilty.
Hey don’t pick on Hornell, it’s the French’s fault, we just build the damn things
Siemens: You should have gone with our ICE, just saying
Looks like Alstom just stooped down to Chinese CRRC levels. I’m hoping to see more Siemens products running in America.
Wasn’t Siemens also running into issues? Heck, if Amtrak just went electric…
Over here in Europe, Alstom seems to make excellent hardware, but their software is just utterly crap. Like, seriously. It's horrendous. It's ready 2 years after planned, and even then it takes 2 years further before it's actually working in a satisfactory manner. Here in Denmark their project of updating the signalling systems in East Denmark is constantly running behind schedule and has huge issues each time a new line is converted, while in West Denmark (where it's being done by Thales and Strukton) there are no issues at all and everything is proceeding according to plan.
Siemens may have screwed over high-speed rail in Canada, so I wouldn't be so sure. Remember, they're corporations. Their only concern is making money.
Those trains actually can't run on US tracks because they are too old and busted according to Amtrak and international experts.
I'm sure they can run. Do they have to haul ass?
Lol, then why did Siemens have zero issues with this with their ALC-42s? And why is Alstom having massive issues with their train contracts elsewhere?
No bud, this is Alstom through and through. They messed up, again. Just like they always do.
LET'S GO SIEMENS! 👏👏, 👏👏👏
Ottawa has the light rail version of BFF…
Should have gone with their German friends at Siemens
They did for literally everything else. But just couldn't resist with the tilting trains. The Siemens alternative was just not there yet. Alstom swore that theirs was so here we are...
You know you could also do this for Siemens because the SC44s and ALC42s have been having a lot of issues lately and the Venture Cars are already starting to fall apart 2 atleast the Midwest ones are
Incredible 🥹
Bro stole this concept from Big Bills Hells. Like the entire video is stolen, just instead of cars it's trains.
Now we need the Boeing version!
This is amazing.
The sad thing is once you factor in all the areas the Acela is not allowed to go full speed it is only something like 20 minutes faster than the regular trains.
Acela is popular because comfy seats, better food and less poor people.
You could do all of that on a regular train for a lot less.
Nah this sounds personal 💀
Imagine someone actually sending this to Amtrak LMAO😂
French trains company would not get SNCF as name but BFFC (Big French Fuckery Company)
1:03 what would be funny if he used footage of an amtrak police car
I want to see a version like this but Bucharest metro trains
“Lets fuck it up”
Imagine coming home from work, taking a few weed gummies and putting this on....I'm fucking crying XD
Yes
Did anyone else find this after finding Big Bill Hell’s Cars commercial?
Alstom hate account
So true
This is an absolute masterpiece.
Gonna need a new bridge now
The smile in his voice on "or you're a dead motherfucker!" ❤😂
thats fucking golden
why doesnt the US ever work with Japan or Spain for high speed?
Unexpected Hornell reference there. 😂
You gotta get Brian in an episode
This is too beautiful, I got a tear in my eye.
If only there was a reliable tiling (almost) high speed train that had been tested in service since around 2000... Yeah, current series only does 145mph, but asking nicely could probably get a 160mph model built in Sacramento. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICE_T
Doesn't that one have a bit of problems of it's own though too?
The diesel version had so many problems they pulled them from service. The electric ones are still going strong, as far as I know. 71 built, 70 still in service. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intercity_Express @@Nyatascha4510
You have a point there so you are saying Amtrak is better off ordering ICE-T DB Baureihe 411 415 the ones that run on Dresden Frankfurt am Main Flughafen Wiesbaden Hbf route
Really what is funny is that rail in France is fine.
Isn't that an Italian style high speed train? Frecciarossa
The lore is expanding...
Best thing since big suka sukoi
alstom did cook with the pendolinos so idk
Pendolino was originally manufactured, and is still developed (under Alstom) by FIAT Ferroviaria.
Hey alan should us HS lines be managed by joint venture between the us govt. and the private corporations in their respective areas with 50/50 cost & profit sharing so that they approve construction faster,🤔🤔🤔
Is best redub ever And It's about trains Even better
Calling yourselves the meanest sons of bitches in the state of New York is a very bold claim.
This is a masterpiece
They’ve should’ve gone with Velaro from the beginning
How did the swearing get through
@marzincitopants should see this
Reminds me of ads inside the gta universe
Alan-Rodney Kantotski collab when?!
Nah I’ll just go to Big Bill Hells
I feel like I'm missing all the context. 😂
Big Bill Hell's Car is the original
Greatest ad campaign of all time
A true masterpeice
This is brilliant
Can we get an Ottawa version next lol
This is a work of art
fu
Siemens on top
Need actual horn
That was intense
I love this. 😂😂😂
dammit I thought this was a real event
Big Bill Hells is perfect for this xD
Nederlanse spoorwegen already tested this shit why u too amtrak 😭😭😭
The ICNG isnt that bad but uhm the introduction goes pretty slowly tho
icng sucks way less than this, it's just US train infrastructure being even more shit than what Prorail does
Yes!!!! 😂😂😂
i love this reference
What the f**ckery is going on! c'est la même chose
I am laughing so hard right now LOL
I can't find any point in this video because you seem more interested in colorful words. What does France have to do with Amtrak,, perhaps you could enlighten us.
Alstom Transportation The Supplier of these Shit new High Speed Train Sets For Amtrak is a French Company with their Headquarters in Saint-Ouen-Sur-Seine
I'm cryign
Fucking incredible
Now I'll do the skibidi toilet and lankybox versions of this
Good luck!
what.
@@rubentreingames6466 I parodying cringe
I guess French and US have broken their ties
Err that happened for the french after the Suez canal. Being backstabbed like that doesn't encourage friends.
God I fucking hate Alstom I needed this.
Master piece
Instant classic
f u