Simple Instructions - Hanna Nitrate HR Checker

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 15 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 123

  • @hanouddiab1132
    @hanouddiab1132 Год назад +1

    Very good and easy explanations thank u

  • @KillerKev1961
    @KillerKev1961 3 года назад +1

    Outstanding Parker! Cheers......

  • @lesb.5664
    @lesb.5664 Год назад +1

    Exactly what I was looking for; thank you!

  • @nicksaquariumreptiletv1378
    @nicksaquariumreptiletv1378 3 года назад +1

    Great Video sam

  • @bjsreef6620
    @bjsreef6620 3 года назад

    Thanks for keeping the information straight and simple..

  • @thomasmccrory1528
    @thomasmccrory1528 3 года назад +1

    Awesome, glad to see you test this! I picked one up a couple weeks back and after several weekly 0.0 test readings I was having some doubts.
    Might be time to get some more fish to try and drive up those levels some.

    • @ParkersReef
      @ParkersReef  3 года назад

      Hmmm I wonder if you can test some known dirty water and see if it gives you a reading?

  • @johnoneill5661
    @johnoneill5661 3 года назад

    Nice and to the point video. I really like that the Hanna checker is not reling on my bad eyes to get a reading 🙄👍👍🤣

    • @ParkersReef
      @ParkersReef  3 года назад

      yeah you and me both, my eyes are terrible!

  • @RogueAquariums
    @RogueAquariums 3 года назад

    So nice to use the high range nitrate checker as it’s accurate, easy to read and a one step process. 👍

  • @IMGbaugher
    @IMGbaugher 3 года назад +1

    Great video!!!

  • @bluechucky
    @bluechucky 3 года назад +3

    Hi Sam, love your vids as always. Just want to point out you are confusing accuracy with resolution. The checker gives values to 0.1 decimal places (that’s resolution) but is accurate to plus or minus 2pmm with a 5% variance. Thus a reported result of 5.0 on your checker means a “real” value in the range of 2.75 to 7.25. It should be used to verify you are in the zone and not to be used to chase a specific number. /nerd

    • @ParkersReef
      @ParkersReef  3 года назад +2

      Yes well spotted and totally correct. Still considerably more accurate with much finer resolution than any tritation nitrate test kit I’ve seen on the market.

  • @bigmuvver
    @bigmuvver 3 года назад

    Great video, short and to the point. Hanna kits I love, to be shown the results, far better than guessing with dodgy eyes, a bit more cash lay out but worth it.

    • @ParkersReef
      @ParkersReef  3 года назад

      I must admit, I think the hanna checkers are good value. Do I like their whole range, def not, but for some of their range they are a great choice

  • @garrycole9187
    @garrycole9187 3 года назад +2

    Great video, my question is why the heck did they not come out with this first. The low range is worthless to me which is my fault for not seeing that it is only good for 0-5 when my nitrates usually hovers around 10-30. I tried doing the LR twice and messed up twice. That is a good 30 minutes of my life I will never get back, I have not used it since. I have seen a guy do the this test first then do the phosphate and the alk then they all ended up at the same time so that is only 7 minutes for 3 test if you do it in the right sequence and have everything prepared to go.

    • @ParkersReef
      @ParkersReef  3 года назад

      Yeah this is the checker the aquarium public wanted, not the LR one…

    • @berniegrant2633
      @berniegrant2633 2 года назад

      Same here

  • @adamshaw5091
    @adamshaw5091 3 года назад +1

    Hey Sam another top vid! Off topic somewhat but what brand/model is your pipette and are you happy with it?

    • @ParkersReef
      @ParkersReef  3 года назад

      Hey Adam, thanks mate! I use a dragon lab unit, was cheap and works a treat!

    • @michelleconabere7063
      @michelleconabere7063 3 года назад

      Where did you get it from Sam

  • @estebanjc1
    @estebanjc1 2 года назад +1

    I have API NO3 and have the same problem yellow.... Colour...maybe a little Orange.... I need the hr of Hanna to see the real number.!!

    • @ParkersReef
      @ParkersReef  2 года назад

      I'm a tough critic of Hanna, but these HR nitrate checkers are great!

  • @Richs_reef
    @Richs_reef 3 года назад

    Great video as always 👍🏻

  • @Macca_75
    @Macca_75 3 года назад

    I was one of "those guys" that bought the LR checker as soon as it was released (due to being colorblind I can't do other tests). Anyway, try shaking the vial for 2 mins. On the LR one you see the sample change after around 70-90 seconds. If you don't do it as per instructions I wonder if the end reading is affected. And yeap I will grab a HR one as well as soon as I can get out of lockdown :-(

    • @ParkersReef
      @ParkersReef  3 года назад +1

      will conduct some testing with the shake time, thanks for sharing :)

  • @stevenelliott631
    @stevenelliott631 2 года назад +1

    Just wondering had you had any issues with the reading outs been wrong. Also what do u keep your phos and nitrates at

    • @ParkersReef
      @ParkersReef  2 года назад

      no this checker has been amazing, very accurate and repeatable. I keep nitrates around 5 and phos around 0.04

    • @stevenelliott631
      @stevenelliott631 2 года назад +1

      @@ParkersReef ok thanks I got some off readings yesterday after water change

  • @simmo56able
    @simmo56able 3 года назад

    Got mine on Saturday and was surprised to find the reading was 15. Not too bad considering I was reading a chart and had estimated 12 on a Salifert. Very easy, will never go back to reading a colour chart again

    • @ParkersReef
      @ParkersReef  3 года назад +1

      15 is not a bad value for such a well established tank. Sulphur is obviously working well for you :)

  • @spicyreef
    @spicyreef 3 года назад +2

    Do you think the high range is more accurate than the regular one?
    "Dr Tim" basically states outright , ALL consumer test kits only show
    if you have
    or do NOT have nitrate...

    • @spicyreef
      @spicyreef 3 года назад

      PS nice job! ur the first one I see actually show the 7 minute setting... hahaha everyone else has tested it w/o timer!

    • @ParkersReef
      @ParkersReef  3 года назад

      I wouldn't say it is more or less accurate than the low range, I do fear with the number of steps involved in the low range that there is a big window for human error though.. Thanks for watching :)

    • @goneincognito6275
      @goneincognito6275 3 года назад

      Would we call the Hanna Checker a "consumer test kit" though?

    • @ParkersReef
      @ParkersReef  3 года назад +1

      @@goneincognito6275 it's certainly not lab grade, but in fairness - I don't know when Dr. Tim said that quote either. Bill gates also said that the internet wouldn't take off :P

    • @spicyreef
      @spicyreef 3 года назад

      @@goneincognito6275 yes :-)

  • @MixPlays
    @MixPlays 3 года назад

    I use a smart stirrer (like AutoAqua) to thoroughly mix the reagent with many test kits including all Hanna ones as well. Works like a charm and don’t need to manually shake it

    • @ParkersReef
      @ParkersReef  3 года назад

      Do you then manually remove the stir bar or leave in there?

    • @MixPlays
      @MixPlays 3 года назад

      @@ParkersReef Yup, I just leave the stirrer on & set a timer, then come back and remove it just before putting it in the checker

    • @ParkersReef
      @ParkersReef  3 года назад

      Not worried about contamination removing the stir bar?

    • @MixPlays
      @MixPlays 3 года назад

      @@ParkersReef Nope, I use a magnet from the outside to lift it up and out without putting any metallic wire/objects in the water - so there’s nothing really that goes in

    • @ParkersReef
      @ParkersReef  3 года назад +1

      Clever!!!

  • @johnkidd3975
    @johnkidd3975 3 года назад

    As promised, can not wait to hear what you think.

    • @ParkersReef
      @ParkersReef  3 года назад

      I think it is a great unit, far superior to any other nitrate test out there (in my opinion!)

  • @Reefkpr1
    @Reefkpr1 3 года назад

    Straight and to the point. I'm gonna have to start ripping my reagents open. LOL. Hey it works for you. I use scissors around the line for a nice clean funnel. Can you adjust your Pipette? Mine has a gear you can turn to adjust so you don't have to ramp down the reading a few mils. Anyway, great video. Waiting for mine to arrive. Finally no more color charts. lol

    • @ParkersReef
      @ParkersReef  3 года назад +1

      Yes it is calibratable, I just haven't done so yet :P

  • @g-reef
    @g-reef 3 года назад

    Thank you for the video, also where did you get the pipet to measure

    • @ParkersReef
      @ParkersReef  3 года назад +1

      Just off ebay man, I did a video of it here:
      ruclips.net/video/bYIlBAPCvy4/видео.html

  • @JoseSanchez-ps5vm
    @JoseSanchez-ps5vm 3 года назад +1

    So I got the nitrate HR I did the test and came out as 1.1 so does that mean my nitrates are at 1ppm 🤷🏻‍♂️

    • @ParkersReef
      @ParkersReef  3 года назад

      Means they are 1.1?

    • @JoseSanchez-ps5vm
      @JoseSanchez-ps5vm 3 года назад

      @@ParkersReef So they are low and I need to raise to 5

    • @ParkersReef
      @ParkersReef  3 года назад +1

      No need to chase a number. 1.1 is fine

    • @JoseSanchez-ps5vm
      @JoseSanchez-ps5vm 3 года назад +1

      @@ParkersReef ok thank you .. and your videos are awesome 👍👍

    • @ParkersReef
      @ParkersReef  3 года назад +1

      Thank you!!

  • @budfish.official
    @budfish.official Год назад

    Hi Can I use it for freshwater?

  • @berniegrant2633
    @berniegrant2633 2 года назад +1

    Only up to 75ppm?? I need something to read 10ppm because I’m battling Dinos

    • @ParkersReef
      @ParkersReef  2 года назад +1

      10ppm is less than 75ppm :)

    • @berniegrant2633
      @berniegrant2633 2 года назад +1

      @@ParkersReef ok got it definitely gonna order one very soon

  • @jestronixhanderson9898
    @jestronixhanderson9898 3 года назад +1

    Glad I didn’t go the LR, I actually have found this to be very accurate, I did two seperate tests and got 4.8 and 4.6 , comments above talk about 5ppm variance ? I then tested my flesh salt mix and got 0.1 , I’m thinking these are .5 accurate not 5.0

    • @ParkersReef
      @ParkersReef  3 года назад

      Yeah I think the range between units could be up to 5ppm. From my experience, results are very repeatable on the same unit though and seem to be very accurate :)

  • @bluereef9530
    @bluereef9530 3 года назад

    I have a question. So if my reading is .02 on salifert how would that read on the new nitrate egg. Since a high range. Do they give you instructions on reading range. Thanks

    • @ParkersReef
      @ParkersReef  3 года назад

      you would need the low range checker. High range would show that as either zero or 0.1

    • @bluereef9530
      @bluereef9530 3 года назад +2

      @@ParkersReef thanks save me money. Don’t like doing a test that takes 15 mins adding three different things .

  • @teemer1282
    @teemer1282 3 года назад

    Oh nice. How do you like the dragon lab? how accurate is it and how often do you need to calibrate if necessary!
    As always enjoyed your informative video.

    • @ParkersReef
      @ParkersReef  3 года назад

      It was cheap, has worked well for a couple years now. I believe it is calibratable too which would save me having to set it to 9.8 😅

  • @Andy.H1
    @Andy.H1 3 года назад

    Great checker but the reagent is quite expensive per test.
    It would be interesting to see if you get a different result if you did shake for 2 minutes as it would give it a total of 9 minutes for the colour to form.

    • @ParkersReef
      @ParkersReef  3 года назад

      Any word on pricing of the reagent? I was expecting it to be the same as there other refills which is quite cheap?

    • @Andy.H1
      @Andy.H1 3 года назад

      Parkers Reef In the UK about £1 per test. Not sure what that is in Australian dollars

    • @ParkersReef
      @ParkersReef  3 года назад

      wow that is expensive! We're looking at about $20 for 25 tests in the refills, which equates to 0.42 pound a test

    • @goneincognito6275
      @goneincognito6275 3 года назад

      @@ParkersReef I saw them in an online store as pre-order (can't remember which one) and they were $30.
      In the states, a pack is US $15 so $30 is about right.

    • @ParkersReef
      @ParkersReef  3 года назад +1

      Potentially price was bumped up due to supply/demand. I’m sure they’ll be the same as other reagents

  • @deaniselin4756
    @deaniselin4756 3 года назад

    I have a low range one and just got the high range and it’s sooo much easier to test

    • @ParkersReef
      @ParkersReef  3 года назад

      Yeah that low range is a bugger

  • @johnkidd3975
    @johnkidd3975 3 года назад

    Well, when you showed the adjustable pipette! (what the h@$^ is that!) fell out of my gob. Instant gadget envy. Good thing I ordered the reagents along with the meter, only ten tests in the box. Looking forward to knowing what the actual number is. I think my frag system is around 40 and DT 10. Thanks for the vid Sam

    • @ParkersReef
      @ParkersReef  3 года назад

      haha you bet, check out the video on the adjustable pipette here: ruclips.net/video/bYIlBAPCvy4/видео.html

  • @freakygoblin3068
    @freakygoblin3068 3 года назад

    Main problem is the cost, not just of the checker as that's a one off. It's the cost of the reagents. Saying that it would be one of the checks I would potentially have a hanna checker for given it's ease of use. I do not check nitrate probably as often as I should though.

    • @ParkersReef
      @ParkersReef  3 года назад +1

      I have had a few say the reagent cost and whilst I don't know how much they are yet - Im expecting them to be about $20 for a pack of 25 which seems fair to me?

    • @freakygoblin3068
      @freakygoblin3068 3 года назад

      Okay, have to use euro prices but Salifert nitrate is €11.50 for 60 tests. Nyos, €21.90 for 40 tests. Hanna reagents are €17.85 for 25 tests. That's salifert at €0.19 per test. Nyos €0.54, Hanna is €0.71. Now you can argue that the accuracy and no need to check colour are worth the cost and sure they are nice. Is it really essential though considering what is more important is stability rather than number chasing. Whilst I am not trying to put people off, indeed I may well get one myself, ongoing cost is a factor for many people.

  • @-Wreckanize-
    @-Wreckanize- 3 года назад

    FYI, set a timer when you wait for 7 minutes, the result only displays for a couple minutes after and if you forget to check it, you have to retest.
    I've wasted 3 packets already by forgetting lol.

    • @ParkersReef
      @ParkersReef  3 года назад

      Ah good tip! Was hoping it didn't disappear quickly like some of their other checkers. I typically do these longer wait period ones first then rip into alk and phos anyway, so its right in front of me - but a time is a good tip to make sure.
      Also - if that is the case, you can do the instant test by pressing instead of holding the button :)

    • @Sativa098
      @Sativa098 3 года назад +1

      could have just filled up the other vile with tank water and done a quick read by just pressing button and not holding down for 7 minute timer

    • @ParkersReef
      @ParkersReef  3 года назад

      @@Sativa098 yep - but you still need to be mindful of the 7 minute reaction time for the reagent. So why not use the built in timer?

    • @Sativa098
      @Sativa098 3 года назад

      @@ParkersReef i never said anything about not using the timer im just saying if you miss it within a few minutes its an option.

    • @ParkersReef
      @ParkersReef  3 года назад

      Yes good call

  • @patterdalezipsuzilil
    @patterdalezipsuzilil 2 года назад +1

    Isn't 1.2 low I thought 5 to 10 sweet spot

    • @ParkersReef
      @ParkersReef  2 года назад

      On which parameter?

    • @patterdalezipsuzilil
      @patterdalezipsuzilil 2 года назад +1

      I use to ppm salifert my coral supplier tells me 5 to 10 nitrates and 0.1 ppm phosphate

    • @ParkersReef
      @ParkersReef  2 года назад

      Excellent. Personally i find anything over 1 to be good 👍🏻

  • @ironmanmachine
    @ironmanmachine 3 года назад

    ...mine was red by the time I was done shaking it...😳

    • @ParkersReef
      @ParkersReef  3 года назад

      Oh no!!!

    • @ironmanmachine
      @ironmanmachine 3 года назад

      @@ParkersReef yeah, code red. 47.5, gonna have to do a 90% water change to bring it back. So glad I got one of these!

    • @ParkersReef
      @ParkersReef  3 года назад +1

      Go a couple 50% changes a day apart instead, 90% change us a big shock to the system

    • @ironmanmachine
      @ironmanmachine 3 года назад

      @@ParkersReef I'm not sure I have time for that. I have a digi that's suffering RTN, tissue is just sloughing off.

    • @ParkersReef
      @ParkersReef  3 года назад

      I hear you, although I doubt a huge quick change will be good in the long run

  • @Mikeymikemike
    @Mikeymikemike 3 года назад

    Thumbnail shows LR

  • @ArachnoJoozt
    @ArachnoJoozt 3 года назад

    Loving almost every video you put out, but not a fan of this one tbh. When showing/testing a new product I think you're better off not winging it and sticking to the manual. You're probably gonna be ok if you shake for exactly 30 seconds every time, maybe not as accurate as 2 mins but a consistent reading, which is most important.
    When nitrates are low like in the dream reef tank, it is especially important to get a good reading. For this low range the low range checker is probably better though, with the possible measuring inaccuracy of the high range checker it is possible that your nitrates are actually zero with this reading. The HR checker is really more useful when nitrates are >5 when an inaccuracy of 2 ppm is less of a problem.

  • @patterdalezipsuzilil
    @patterdalezipsuzilil 2 года назад +1

    You again 😆😆😆

  • @x2wolves927
    @x2wolves927 3 года назад +1

    First

  • @cptblight20
    @cptblight20 3 года назад

    2 down votes. You shake your head sometimes