@RaynieDay Yes, but dslr lens has multiple coatings so flare pattern is very different from those from smart phone. The producer never show the gears and test setup.
same, when I didn’t know pictures much, I d prefer Sony (bright) but once have more experience on it (still a beginner) then prefer canon (taste more like an original pic)
Хз, на соньке аля хдр, белые задраны, контраста больше. Мутный цвет на кэноне, мб особенность кэнононовской дешманской оптики(сомневаюсь что там фикс или элька). Настройки чувак не показывает, внешку камер тоже, скорее всего на обоих камерах режим "шедевр" стоит. А может оно всё на телефон снято😂
@SergSpace Дружище, не уверен что правильный перевод получился. Я имею обе системы и канон и сони, и достаточно много объективов к ним, не хочу обижать ни кэнон, ни сони). Недорогая оптика имеет особенность в виде "пыльного" тусклого цвета. Особенно стёкла типа недорогих базовых зумов типа 18-135, 16-50 или 24-105 not-L, в которых много оптических элементов но просветление и дисперсионность стекла не топ уровня. Для простых, с точки зрения оптики, фиксов это не так сильно бросается в глаза.
@@СтаниславЛогинов-ш9й There is the reason why some optics cost less. I have Canon 5d Mark IV and 80D with 18-135 and 70-200 f2.8 (III) and bunch of others. I can tell the difference. I have Sony camera with 16-50, f/2.8 and bunch of Minolta lenses. In the end of the day it all comes to algorithm of camera processing. But in my opinion Canon optics colors are still beat Sony. This is why you may find Canon adapter to fit Canon lenses to other cameras, but I never saw Sony adapter to fit Sony lenses to Canon. Anyway, Canon colors come out right from RAW files in lightroom and Sony's are always red/yello/magenta-ish. It's still Ok, but Canon is on top.
0:38 huge lens flare on both videos, indicating both are shot by smart phones.
lens flares do infact show up on dslrs????
@RaynieDay Yes, but dslr lens has multiple coatings so flare pattern is very different from those from smart phone. The producer never show the gears and test setup.
Same footage are from same camera.. or phone
feel the same
Canon always more cinematic, thats what makes it different
For me canon wins!!!
Can you tell me why? I’m still deciding
@@3816rrrr o think the colors are more natural. And Canon câmeras are easyer to operate. Sorry about my english rsrs
same, when I didn’t know pictures much, I d prefer Sony (bright) but once have more experience on it (still a beginner) then prefer canon (taste more like an original pic)
Filmed using a mobile phone running Android 10
Videography = zev10 wins
Photography= no one like mark 2 under 60 thousand
It paid promotion
Which is best for photography and ocassional videography.please help.
which model of mark 2 ? 200d ?
Also Canon m50 video test ruclips.net/video/rCwZ_iUaUZo/видео.html
clickbait dislike
Where’s the girl on the thumbnail?
Tf bruh 😂😂😂
i can't believe you've done this
I am still looking for the girl I can't find her in this video
canon r50 ? is it good bro? stabilization available in video ?
clickbait
What lens?
Pixels all over the place. Both sucks. I still have my 10 years old 550D and i see no difference except autofocus and slight dinamic range.
imagens praticamente idênticas em tudo
Nice. What lenses did you used my man ??????????????
the lenses that are in his smartphones
se miran sospechosas las tomas
Sonys white washin it out. Their camera has been discontinued 😂😅
😏 "No Lo Sé Rick, Parece Falso"
very good explanation😀
filmed on 1 samsung or Android for everything
canon is better in still shot , sony is too worm (YELLOW) picture
for video campare sony look more width
Bikini girl ko dekh kar aaya wo to dikhi hi nhi...
Canon🏆
Thank you
Sony is best
Canon best
Sony wins
Хз, на соньке аля хдр, белые задраны, контраста больше. Мутный цвет на кэноне, мб особенность кэнононовской дешманской оптики(сомневаюсь что там фикс или элька). Настройки чувак не показывает, внешку камер тоже, скорее всего на обоих камерах режим "шедевр" стоит. А может оно всё на телефон снято😂
Canon has a best optics ever. What a knock off optics were you talking about?
@SergSpace Дружище, не уверен что правильный перевод получился. Я имею обе системы и канон и сони, и достаточно много объективов к ним, не хочу обижать ни кэнон, ни сони). Недорогая оптика имеет особенность в виде "пыльного" тусклого цвета. Особенно стёкла типа недорогих базовых зумов типа 18-135, 16-50 или 24-105 not-L, в которых много оптических элементов но просветление и дисперсионность стекла не топ уровня. Для простых, с точки зрения оптики, фиксов это не так сильно бросается в глаза.
@@СтаниславЛогинов-ш9й There is the reason why some optics cost less. I have Canon 5d Mark IV and 80D with 18-135 and 70-200 f2.8 (III) and bunch of others. I can tell the difference. I have Sony camera with 16-50, f/2.8 and bunch of Minolta lenses. In the end of the day it all comes to algorithm of camera processing. But in my opinion Canon optics colors are still beat Sony. This is why you may find Canon adapter to fit Canon lenses to other cameras, but I never saw Sony adapter to fit Sony lenses to Canon. Anyway, Canon colors come out right from RAW files in lightroom and Sony's are always red/yello/magenta-ish. It's still Ok, but Canon is on top.