Core i3 14100F vs Core i9 10900K - 4 Years Difference
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 21 июл 2024
- Intel 14th Core i3 14100F DDR5 vs Intel 10th Core i9 10900K DDR4 l 1080p
Buy games at the best prices on gamivo.com - gvo.deals/TestingGames
Use coupon code and get discount - TG3
Games :
Hogwarts Legacy - 0:00 - gvo.deals/TG3HogwartsLegacy
CYBERPUNK 2077 - 0:59 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesCP2077
Assassin's Creed Mirage - 2:09
Starfield - 3:19
Forza Horizon 5 - 4:17 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesForza5
Red Dead Redemption 2 - 5:19 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesRDR2
Microsoft Flight Simulator - 6:22 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesMFS20
The Witcher 3 - 7:20 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesWitcher
System:
Windows 11
Core i3-14100F - bit.ly/420c9K8
ASUS ROG Strix Z790-E Gaming - bit.ly/3scEZpc
32Gb RAM DDR5 6000MHz - bit.ly/3BOxlni
Intel i9 10900K - bit.ly/2YcPUkI
MSI MPG Z490 GAMING PLUS - bit.ly/3hsf9Hs
32Gb RAM DDR4 3600Mhz - bit.ly/2YmtsEA
CPU Cooler - MSI MAG CORELIQUID C360 - bit.ly/3mOVgiy
GeForce RTX 4090 24GB - bit.ly/3CSaMCj
SSD - 2xSAMSUNG 970 EVO M.2 2280 1TB - bit.ly/2NmWeQe
Power Supply CORSAIR RM850i 850W - bit.ly/3i2VoGI 
Игры
Games :
Hogwarts Legacy - 0:00 - gvo.deals/TG3HogwartsLegacy
CYBERPUNK 2077 - 0:59 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesCP2077
Assassin's Creed Mirage - 2:09
Starfield - 3:19
Forza Horizon 5 - 4:17 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesForza5
Red Dead Redemption 2 - 5:19 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesRDR2
Microsoft Flight Simulator - 6:22 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesMFS20
The Witcher 3 - 7:20 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesWitcher
System:
Windows 11
Core i3-14100F - bit.ly/420c9K8
ASUS ROG Strix Z790-E Gaming - bit.ly/3scEZpc
32Gb RAM DDR5 6000MHz - bit.ly/3BOxlni
Intel i9 10900K - bit.ly/2YcPUkI
MSI MPG Z490 GAMING PLUS - bit.ly/3hsf9Hs
32Gb RAM DDR4 3600Mhz - bit.ly/2YmtsEA
CPU Cooler - MSI MAG CORELIQUID C360 - bit.ly/3mOVgiy
GeForce RTX 4090 24GB - bit.ly/3CSaMCj
SSD - 2xSAMSUNG 970 EVO M.2 2280 1TB - bit.ly/2NmWeQe
Power Supply CORSAIR RM850i 850W - bit.ly/3i2VoGI
Damn, the usage on the 10900K is so high in modern games. Time flies quickly.
Still consistently higher avg/1%/.1% lows in most games. I think comparing the 14400f would of been fairer. The 14100f only having 4 cores really gimps it in modern games.
@ryzenryzen1936 But it is still only giving like 150 fps only at 1080p.
@ryzenryzen1936yes with 14600kf of mine im getting 150w+ power usage and 70% cpu usage in tlou 1080p. Using 4070s as gpu
@@madgodzilla12465 It has 4 performance cores, which have two threads each. Of course, having 8 threads does not mean that it has the performance of a processor that really has 8 physical cores, however, they do have the same capacity for multitasking.
10900k is obv better, more real cores, less cpu usage, 14100f is like double of the cpu usage, means it will bottleneck faster, even the gpu usage is lower on the 14100f, cause its not powerfull enough to boost the card
That's insane performance for an I3.
Not really because he is playing gpu intensive games if it was cpu intensive there would be a massive difference
I think bro doesn't know about GPUs bro will buy a Mac book and be like why it's not running gya 5 smoothly even it's a 10 year old game 😂@@FrimzLovesStreamline
I3 13100F is 2% slower than 14100F so you get quite much the same results from a previous gen while paying less
No really, we are talking about a 14th Generation processor versus a 10th generation several years later. Even though it's a Core i9.
This just proves that 4-Core processors are finished, low performance, high levels of instability and very high usage cause crashes in some cases.
I don't recommend I3 to my worst enemy, I5 12400F/13400F are already very cheap and easily beat this horrible I3 costing practically the same price.
@@FrimzLovesStreamlineCyberpunk, flight simu 2020 and starfield not being CPU intensive? WTF are you smoking mate 😂😂😂😂
If the game uses 4 cores or less, the difference between processors is minimal. Pay attention to the CPU utilization rate.
It is kind of crazy to think in 4 Years a current i3 would not be that far off from i9 only 4 years old. It shows you how bad Intel CPU's were till they went to 12th Gen and new design.
lol intel has always been faster at single core usage which is the metric that defines game performance. This coming from a guy that owns both AMD and intel systems.
Maybe you should pay a little more attention to the video. The i3 is completely tapped out in some games and is completely getting annihilated by the old i9 when it comes to consistent smooth frame rates. Considering the 14100 is a brand new CPU, it's not even suitable for some games right now so it's a stupid purchase. And that's on a clean test system with nothing even running in the background. So for real world usage it's going to be even worse as 4 cores just does not cut it anymore.
It's impressive but also not a well balanced CPU for modern gaming (look at Cyberpunk for example) I'd still aim for something better than the i3 if gaming is the focus.
Wattage?@@robertsharp6072
you guys even read cpu usage of the i3? its at 80%+ when i9 10900k is at 30-40%, it will bottleneck very fast
I hope the next gen i3 is atleast 6 core, 12 thread tbh.
Nah 8C/16T
i3 15100F 4P 2E ❤
@@MDJpoikithey changed the name scheme for next next. It will be something like Core 3 150f.
Eeewwwww that name is disgusting @@cxngo8124
intel in gen 15 its no thread in all processors
I'd be curious to see how much more you could get out of the 14100f with a BCLK overclock, with certain motherboards, going from 4.5Ghz to like 5.5+ would prolly make a huge difference in alot games, especially with it being a quad core, needs all the help it can get now.
Thanks! I got the 10900k would be nice with 1440P and 4k vs new cpus.
its still a great cpu and paired with something like a 3080 and higher it will be more than enough for atleast a few more years.
10c20t is holding out GREAT.
YES, YOU'RE BACK ❤
Your back!!!!!!! How did you recover this channel back???
People, what's your favorite Skylake processor? Mine is the 8700k. It overclocks well, it's still relevant today, I like that it's easy to delid.
I'm still rocking a 10900K. Been wanting to upgrade for a while, but waiting for the Ryzen 9xxx series. Fortunately, all I play is RDR2, so I'm good for now. 😊
Have you tried to overclock it? That CPU is a beast!
i wait then intel will make new good cpu. Sadly new cpus is a shitshow. 8 cores that u cant cool no matter what on STOCK. waiting for 16 pcore cpu as 12 wont be enough vs 10 in my eyes for the price i9 cost nowadays and i dont care about that ecores crap.
I don't know if you saw it but even though they were the same many times the I3 felt like it was pushing and suddenly destabilized the image, in the witch it is more noticeable
this test goes to show us that game developers don't optimize games for higher core cpu's so the cpu is barely being used if you have something with higher than 8c/16t. hopefully this changes as things progress. games like cyberpunk and starfield use the higher core count cpu's to almost their full potential and you can see the difference in performance when that happens. this is also the same thing with intel 14th gen vs ryzen 7800x3d. the games don't utilize all of the cores intel chips has so the performance is basically shown as 7800x3d being the winner.
Nice comparison !
Im still fine with my I9 10850k. DDR4 4000mhz DualRankend ram brings a bit more performance.
With a decent undervolt it also consumes whay less power.
But with the 4080 now there is clearly a bottlenek, unless you play with high resolution and just a 60hz 4K TV.
I prefer a crisp image rather than extreme high fps
Would be interesting to see what kind of uplift a 7800x 3D would be
But i can wait until the next generation anyways.
7800x3d only shines in 1080p and multiplayer games, for 4k gaming even a 14100 will do just fine.
@@joelfernando1 but 1% lows will not be that great.
My 10900k undervolt - 0,153 Mhz
power usage diff looks crazy
It would be nice to see a comparison between the 7800x3d and the 10900k. It would show whether upgrading makes sense.
J'ai acheté un 7800x3d il y a un mois pour ma 4090 gaming OC Gigabyte !
Ma 4090 tournai avec mon 10900k depuis fin 2022 !
( date de sortie des 4090)
Je joue en 3440x1440 120hz
Le 10900k tenais parfaitement la 4090 sur tous les jeux à 120 FPS ! Juste certains titres ou par moment quelques rares chutes jusqu'à 70/80 FPS,
invisible en jeux car pas de lag !
Effectivement le 7800x3d tient mieux mes 120 FPS constant partout.
C'est presque décevant car je le pensais incroyablement meilleur et que ça allait être fou.
C'est juste un peu mieux.
Par contre sur starfield par exemple je n'est que 5 FPS de différence en mieux avec le 7800x3d !
La bonne chose est le % d'utilisation du 7800x3d, très très faible, même sur des gros jeux. Et la consommation vraiment très faible !
7800x3d is leagues above this processor, it even beat 13900kf in most of the games & doing that just by utilizing half of the power.
that CPU is for gaming only, in multitasking and rendering my 13600k wipes the floor with that overhyped overpriced gaming only glowing red hot near exploding AMD piece of craaap!!@@sarmad8101
Ryzen 7800x3d spit the entire Intel processor 😂
i3 12100f vs 13100f vs 14100f pls
no difference basically, 12100f is still a goated cpu, they need 6 cores for the i3 minimum
Ok
@@TestingGames 😍🥰🥳
@@TestingGames Are you still Andrei, or did another person take over the channel?
12100 BCLK overclock 5Ghz it's better, out of three
the 13th gen and 14th gen is the biggest leap in perf for intel honestly:) the 13900k is a monster and so is the i7 13700k
try ryzen 3700x vs 7800x3d its same 4 years difference
A 4090 would bottleneck even a 14900K at 1080p....... 10900K still has life left in it for many games IF you're using the intended resolution for this card aka 4K
I have the 10900k with a 4090 and in 4K runs great for me
I have the i9 10900k with the 4080 playing at 1440p, does the job for me👍🏻
i've been running my 10900k with a 4090 in 3440x1440p now for many months and its smashing everything out there.
So if I change my 4790k for a new i3 it will be fantastic. Thanks.
yes anyone on intel hardware older than 9th gen should def be getting an i3, it will destroy all those older cpus
@@fivemethoxy*don’t listen to him my sweet i7 8th, block your ears!*
Yep and since it's not a k processor you can go for cheaper board without an issue, I'd still prefer a ryzen 7500f on am5 platform, get 2 more cores better perf and upgrqdeability,
My second PC works with 4770 k perfect
look at how much processors loaded. Use the processor intensively sittings. Put low quality graphics sittings
would be nice test 7500f vs 9900k/10900k
Could you test Ryzen 5 7500F against Ryzen 5 7600X ? Would be nice to see how much faster 7600X is
Very little!
He already did it
Check it out
Yt comments couldnt contain links
Ryzen 7 5700X3D vs Ryzen 9 5900X which one is better for normal use and game only?
5700x3d
a similar amd test would be ncie too!
I tested the i3-12100f on my board with BCLK overclocking to 5GHz. + 6200 MHz memory with compressed timings. In CPU-Z, single thread was higher than 11900k, and multi thread was slightly higher than 8700k. I used to have a 10900f. So I compared it in the games where I once tested the 10900f. The results are amazing. In most games it was par, or the 12100f was a faster. It's a pity I didn't get my hands on 12400.
lmao dont lie to yourself my man. 12100f aint nowhere close clocked or stock doesnt matter.
@@user-fi5hc9um6q Lol. Buy a board with a BCLK multiplier and try it yourself. Since it’s difficult for you to search for tests on the Internet yourself. I have held all these pieces of hardware in my hands and know what they can do in practice.
Im suprised some games wont utilize more than 4 threads (flight simulator) in 2024.
Me too. A game like FS should utilise more cores
that 10th gen power consumption is nutz,
Only if you play like this at 1080p, is better if you have a 1440p or 4 k monitor.
I notice the i9's utilization is far lower while giving the same or slightly better performance. The reason the i3 has so much utilization is probably due to low core counts to be honest.
Wait till panther lake 3 gens in a roughly 1 year time frame. try to be paitient til 2025. Gonna need a new mb and ddr5 ram for that. I assume rtx 5k will be out by then too but we should have it soon hopefully
9700f/kf vs 14700kf please?
can u test ? i3 12100f vs 13100f vs 14100f
not worth it, same CPU's with slightly higher speeds - imagine each one only a little bit better..(a few singular frames..not much more)
Wery interesting, thank you.
Rtx 4090 в 1080p? Можно провести тесты хотя бы в 2k, чтобы хоть немного систему загрузить
Тут тест процессоров. Максимальная нагрузка на процессор в более низком разрешении. Поэтому процессоры всегда в 1080р сравнивают
Another clown or beginner right here boys
Вообще глупый тест, 10900 в полтора раза мощнее чем 14100. Разница на много больше чем у 10900 и 14900
Você poderia fazer i9 9900k vs i3 14100f??? Ou até i7 9700k.
It’s very interesting that you will get a huge amount of money for such a build and on average in all games you get about 70 fps on a 160 Hz monitor, and there are still monitors and 360 Hz has seen somewhere 😳😁🤔
its not only the procesor, ram speed different too
14100f vs 12600k, please, thank you.
For an i3 that's very respectable.
But also look at the consumption of the I3 is usually around 50W and the I9 is always over 100W.
I3 14100F vs Ryzen 5 7600
Pls very requested comparison...
Damm, for far too long i really want a new pc with the mighty 10/20 i9 10900k... too poor to afford back then... now its performing the same as a "measly" i3. LOL.
PS: Gave in and bought a 13700k, but stayed with the 3060ti that i bought for my old 4700k, because my 980ti died on me.
No it is not. Gameplay will always be smoother on the i9. I have one and I have a 12100 in my wife's computer. 4c/8t is a stuttery mess.
the only thing i look at is the power draw. the i3 draws less than like 50 watts while the i9 is over a hundred-150
Back when 10° gen was the top pick, I bought a i3100f, people had laugh that I had a i3 while they had i7 of gen 7° and I had more performance, gonna switch my i3 10100f for i3 14100f
i5, 14600k ❤
can you do i7 9700k vs i3 14100f
No
I LOVE MY 10900K AND 32GB AT 3600MHZ ON NVME 1 TERA AND 3 SSD
The 10900k is similar to the 5700x so pretty decent even these days
its more like a 5800x.
@@user-fi5hc9um6q pretty much the same anyway lol
en este video se puede ver claramente como no todos los juegos usan el HT o multihilos. el i3 tiene 4 núcleos fisico y 8 hilos pero son muy buenos mono hilo por eso hogwarts legacy entre otros no usa mas del 50/60% del cpu y rinde igual o mas todo depende el juego pero la tendencia es mono hilo para los juegos nuevos. 2024 en adelante
Intel should just allow i3s to have a K series
i3-14300K
i5-14600K
i7-14700K
i9-14900K
10900K vs 7800X3D please
The 10900K is gonna be demolished bro
Actually it is just 12100 vs 10900k
Wrong, 14100 clock 400mhz higher than a 12100 and 10 vs 11900k is two different cpus, one have more cores than the other...please.
architecture is same, but 400mhz higher clock makes a big difference in gaming and latency.
i still would rather have the 10900k for that reason :)
i went from 12100f to 13400f, didn't notice much difference at all..
@@JustRelx That dosn't say much, you gpu might be the limiting factor, what resolution? 13400f will give you 10%+ boost in minimum and average fps. That is pretty good.
DDR5 vs DDR4?🤔
Looks like more cores are better games start using more than 6
Ecores sucks, in games with high CPU usage 14400F fall behind 10900k hardly, but in games that not use CPU so much (so Ecore no needed) this 2 processors are the same.
I only have one rule: New is always better
Not really surprising. Try a game that utilises more cores and watch the i3 die. 4 cores is dead unless you are using office.
There is none, honestly he just ran Cyberpunk and Starfield, which are some of the worst performing games, and that i3 handled business.
10900K stil wins by having the ringbus, so much lower latency between cores.
"Quad Core bad rn reeee"
the more complex the game, the greater the advantage of the core i9
fps isn't everything, look at that power draw.
🔥🔥🔥
The fact that an i3 keeps up with an i9😭
I3 сильно загружен и почему то 4090 не напрягает в отличии от i9, фпс неоднозначный
Удивление.. добавьте 5600x для сравнения
Do you believe guys this wonderful i3 CPU costs just 11000inr
10900k мощнее, а если еще и разогнать то будет вообще пушка
Impressive for a 100 dollar chip
vs ryzen 5600 and 7500F 🙂
shame you didn't run that 10900K at 5 or 5.1
Shame that they wont unlock the i3, Lol
@@GideonGrimThey have in the past. They Even had unlocked Pentiums.
@AngelOfDeath420 I mean you're not wrong. Ask yourself what changed? The 8th and 9th generation intel had k-series i3, yet why stop for the 10th, 11th, 12, 13, and 14th generation?
Because they knew they would lose sales on their higher end CPUs once everyone figured out that you don't need all the bs for gaming.
i3 14100f vs i5 12400f
it's been 4 years and the highest tier CPU lost facing the lowest tier one lmao 😂😂😂
i am shocked
Hmm not bad
160w vs 50w.
my core i5 11400f is worse than that i3🙁😭😭😭
winner 12400f OC(5.0GHz) + B660M AsRock Riptide.
bro 4090 using 45% in i3 💀💀💀💀
All that this video shows is that both CPUs bottleneck the 4090 LOL
Bro what happened to your channel 😂
Что и требовалось доказать. 10+10 потоков честных на 5.1 ггц против 4+4 честных на 4.7 ггц максимальных. И разгром в половине игр многоядерника (либо равные результаты). Вывод - разработчикам игр нужно отрывать растущие из задницы руки, так как в 2024 году подобные результаты - позорны.
В один два потока грузят в сотку остальные по остаточному принципу вот и разница минимальна 8 поточника против 20 поточника. Жаль что Total War Saga troy в тесте не было 14100 даже Xeon проиграет 2666v3 ))
@@alexs9607 Да, и для 2024 года такой подход - лютое дно. АМД сделали 3д кэш не зря - он даже в подобной ситуации помогает (128 мб кэша - это круто)
кто собрал на АМ4 в то время,просто сидят ржут 100%))
Естественно,5800х3д накажет эти оба недокамня))
Both having bottleneck
По Cyberpunk 2077 стало понятно, что i3 вообще в сравнение не годится, слабенький.
fortnite please
Holy shit I misread and i thought it was an i5
Fake test.
marginal difference at best.
there were couple games 10900k won by about 40%-50%, thats not marginal
And lost in that cargame lol@@dex4sure361
margin of 50% hahaha
Server fortnite para panama
I think that if both systems had ddr4, i9 would have won, and ddr5 compensates for the lack of performance.
i9 10900k has much more expensive components tho...
Wrong test. A mid-range card should have been tested with these processors i3 its too weak with 4090
No, you use the best GPU possible (4090) to purely test how fast the CPU can go.
Where Fortnite ? 😢
Dw it works fine🙃
result...i9 10900K is garbage cpu
What type of "DUMB" someone have to be to use 4090 GPU and i3 cpu? If someone will buy that at shop, the shopkeeper will laugh at you first before saying anything else.
Ez Bottleneck.
Just a stupid question....
4090 is for 4k gaming right..then if we use i3 14th gen do we see bottleneck? Except low core stuffs
@@stringer8839 Yes
Не корректное сравнение. Больше скажу, очень не уместное и глупое.
where is 2k and 4k res?🥱
Wow, Thanks AMD!