120W in The Witcher 3 just from the CPU is too much already IMO. As for the performance yes it's still enough for casual stuff. And still that's a Ryzen 5 5600X level of performance and it draws twice as low watts than the 10700K.
What i find crazy is how close in some games they are in cpu usage...that diffirence even in average is quite little in comparison to the core and thread diffirence.
I think i3 might lead on some games but mostly on average. while i7 leads on % lows even if i3 generate good average frames. Better also looking on consistency. i7-10700k still holds up today
У меня i7 11700k я его ещё даже не думаю менять, я его поменяю когда почувствую что мне лично не комфортно с ним. Но явно не буду судить его по цифрам в бенчмарках разных.
I love my 10700k but it cannot maintain consistent 144fps in many games. In CSGO it gets lower fps than other newer cpus and starts to bottleneck with top tier gpus.
The 12700K has far more perfomance per watt than that i3, the power consumption on the 14100F doesn't look impressive for the process node and the smaller transistors it uses.
@@saricubra2867 Really? At launch in a number of tests the 5600x was faster than the 10700K in a lot of games, the majority in fact. Productivity was a win for the 10700K, but for gaming the 5600x was faster, probably still is for games that can't leverage more than 6 fast cores or doesn't dip heavily into HT. Was the 5600X over priced, yes it should have been no more than $250, but I also thought the 10700K at an MSRP of $387 was also about $50 too expensive. I would rather have a 10700K myself, but I'm curious why you think the 5600x was overrated? For a 6 core gaming CPU, it was actually better than what Intel had on offer until the 12600K arrived 14 months later, and then it wasn't that far off.
@@saricubra2867 Nope, not in the test results i've seen. Compared to 10700K over a 10 game selection it was neck and neck for average and 1% lows, the 5600x was about 5% faster than a 10700k for average FPS, so about within margin of error. For 1% lows, the 5600x had a 20% spread between 1% lows and the average FPS. The 10700K about a 22% spread. So really nothing between the 2 CPUs in that regard. The 5600x actually has twice the L3 cache as the 10700K and more L2 cache. You don't seem to know what you are really talking about here. What is your evidence for your opinion, and if you mention Frame Chasers, I will laugh my @ss off. LOL 😉
The I3 has better single core performance compared to the I7 10700k. I also guess being on DDR5 help with performance versus DDR4. One of the reason why the I3 lose to the I7 in certain games, it because of the lack of core
10700k for low price OK, for fair price - choice 12400f. Also 12100f is good, but 13100f and 14100f, 13400f and 14400f waste of money(50% more average price for 1-6% better perfomance) )
Looking at all these video. It seem its nonsensical to buy those costly i7 and i9 for just buy a cheap i3 or cheap i5. Put it on a cheap board game on it for 1-2 years than buy another. These cheaper i3 and i5 are priced really low so their resale value is actually very good. Much better than a i7 and i9. So basically this should be very affordable.
@@Daniel-oc8sx its not about that it's about the difference a 4 years can make , anyway I'm buying a new pc i7 14the gen DDR5 4080 super I need to play at 4K see you in 4 years Insha'Allah when @TestingGames compare my pc to a low tear one lol
The i7-10700K and RTX 3080 combo is still great in 2024. Intel 15th Gen and GeForce 50 will be the time that most will upgrade. Cant wait to run the Core Ultra 7 265K and RTX 5080! I've been saving up since 2020 for it. The i7 + 80 tier combo for the last 10 years has been simply the best for gaming. No need for an i9 and a 90 tier. Back then, they were Xeons and Titans.
@@fpshunter Since 2016 ive been on a 4 year upgrade cycle, with the i7 as my main choice. Both my 10700K and 6700K with my 1080 served me well, I dont think i'll be getting the 9800X3D when it launches.
Intel 15th gen be like: refreshed refresh! i9 15900k will have 6.3 ghz turbo, compared to i9 14900k, which had 6.0 ghz We don't care if your cooler won't handle this power! And also we prepared a special edition i9 15900ks with 6.5ghz turbo! We are still in the same stone age 10nm process **people laughing**
How is intel lithography stoneage? U have literally 24 cores thats impressive maybe not as much as 10 core 14nm but still. Amd still stuck on 8 core cpus
A theoretical Ryzen 3 with 3D cache could still be a helluva budget gaming CPU. Generally, the last Ryzen 3 that weren't strapped off cache were 3100 / 3300x (with the latter doing pretty impressibly upon launch in 2020).
6 to 8 cores with at least 4.4GHz clock speed is the best for gaming. Some games are optimized to utilize certain number of cores and some games run very poorly with 16+ cores.
What I'm about to say explains everything all at once, yet explains nothing at all, in terms of how a computer actually functions. Okay, are you ready for it? Electricity follows the path of least resistance. . . 💀😂😂😂
I would say its incorrect to compare it on two different ddr platforms. ddr 4 against ddr 5 . Otherwise we need to see price comparicement. Im pretty sure that 1200 cheaper, and if we speak not only gaming , 10700k platform is better choice especially for 4090
nobody ever does that obviously but since this is a benchmark testing, they wanted to make sure that there will be no gpu bottlenecking whatsoever - if they did this with a budget card, both cpu would give the same result in every title selected and render the whole purpose of the testing meaningless - for example, both cpu would give you 90 FPS in a title with a budget card because the gpu would be the limiting factor not the cpu
I do not understand this testing and results, like Hogwarts for example - both cpu and gpu doing nothing and still fps is only 47-49 - so there's obviously a bottleneck somewhere, where exactly?
Games :
CYBERPUNK 2077 - 0:00
Ghost of Tsushima - 0:52
Horizon Forbidden West - 1:57
Hogwarts Legacy - 3:02
Red Dead Redemption 2 - 4:04
Forza Horizon 5 - 5:08
The Witcher 3 - 6:10
Starfield - 7:13
System:
Windows 11
Core i3-14100F - bit.ly/420c9K8
ASUS ROG Strix Z790-E Gaming - bit.ly/3scEZpc
32Gb RAM DDR5 6000MHz - bit.ly/3BOxlni
Intel i7 10700K - bit.ly/2MNA9dF
MSI MPG Z490 GAMING PLUS - bit.ly/3hsf9Hs
32Gb RAM DDR4 3600Mhz - bit.ly/2YmtsEA
CPU Cooler - MSI MAG CORELIQUID C360 - bit.ly/3mOVgiy
GeForce RTX 4090 24GB - bit.ly/3CSaMCj
SSD - 2xSAMSUNG 970 EVO M.2 2280 1TB - bit.ly/2NmWeQe
Power Supply CORSAIR RM850i 850W - bit.ly/3i2VoGI
Compare 14100f vs 12400f please, they have same price.
I have 10700 and for me is enough
120W in The Witcher 3 just from the CPU is too much already IMO. As for the performance yes it's still enough for casual stuff. And still that's a Ryzen 5 5600X level of performance and it draws twice as low watts than the 10700K.
@chovekb ah 5600x. amd also make "cpu", but... better not eat this sh1t😉
@@thelion4838 one must be very stupid to call something a "sh1t", which does the same job for less cost and energy.
i think gen11 is better 10-15% performance, bcos it has gen4 pcie. even with i5
Also have 10700 with 6650xt and there is no game that stutters or that I almost cant max out (1080p)
What i find crazy is how close in some games they are in cpu usage...that diffirence even in average is quite little in comparison to the core and thread diffirence.
realistically 15th or 16th gen is when the 10700k will get wiped across the board
We wont see a 16th gen
intel will rebranding core series to ultra
@@xflashu8075 im aware there will still be a 16th generation
6-core era of gaming now.
So, 14100F with 4-core sucks.
4 cores are killing the i3 in some games.
Above 90% of usage is not good (Bottleneck)
This is i3 13100f vs i9 9900k same cpus with old names
I9 and i7 is very different completly different ring and imc.
I think i3 might lead on some games but mostly on average. while i7 leads on % lows even if i3 generate good average frames. Better also looking on consistency. i7-10700k still holds up today
У меня i7 11700k я его ещё даже не думаю менять, я его поменяю когда почувствую что мне лично не комфортно с ним. Но явно не буду судить его по цифрам в бенчмарках разных.
So, owners of 10100 can sell their platform and upgrade to 14100 for the next 3 years. When DDR 6 comes out.
Why? What game released that u need to upgrade? U are just schizo
I5 14400f vs i9 10900k ? 😊
you all need to consider the low 1% and 0,1% cuz that makes or breaks the experience.
Given the budget price of a 14100F I think it holds it's own considering it takes about half to 2/3rds the power.
Its not good. Most of the game here didnt even used 4 cores, bad games same as cpu
Meanwhile a ryzen 5800X3D still rocks on a good MOBO from 2017. 🙂
I love my 10700k but it cannot maintain consistent 144fps in many games. In CSGO it gets lower fps than other newer cpus and starts to bottleneck with top tier gpus.
The 12700K has far more perfomance per watt than that i3, the power consumption on the 14100F doesn't look impressive for the process node and the smaller transistors it uses.
People forget that now i3 is equivalent of high end i7 of before, and is not even that long ago
I have 10700K on 4.9GHz still solid
Pretty much a 9900K.
Faster than the overrated and overpriced 5600X when it came out, then that Ryzen 5 got wrecked by Alder Lake and Raptor Lake i5s.
@@saricubra2867 Really?
At launch in a number of tests the 5600x was faster than the 10700K in a lot of games, the majority in fact. Productivity was a win for the 10700K, but for gaming the 5600x was faster, probably still is for games that can't leverage more than 6 fast cores or doesn't dip heavily into HT.
Was the 5600X over priced, yes it should have been no more than $250, but I also thought the 10700K at an MSRP of $387 was also about $50 too expensive.
I would rather have a 10700K myself, but I'm curious why you think the 5600x was overrated? For a 6 core gaming CPU, it was actually better than what Intel had on offer until the 12600K arrived 14 months later, and then it wasn't that far off.
@@davidandrew6855 5600X lack of cache , clocks and cores hurted the 1% lows and frametimes.
@@saricubra2867 Nope, not in the test results i've seen.
Compared to 10700K over a 10 game selection it was neck and neck for average and 1% lows, the 5600x was about 5% faster than a 10700k for average FPS, so about within margin of error. For 1% lows, the 5600x had a 20% spread between 1% lows and the average FPS. The 10700K about a 22% spread. So really nothing between the 2 CPUs in that regard.
The 5600x actually has twice the L3 cache as the 10700K and more L2 cache. You don't seem to know what you are really talking about here.
What is your evidence for your opinion, and if you mention Frame Chasers, I will laugh my @ss off. LOL 😉
Thought the I7 would easily win turns out the I3 might not be that bad
I have found that I hate modern new games...they are terrible
I wonder why the i3 can, in principle, be better in some games, it uses some new instructions or something...
The I3 has better single core performance compared to the I7 10700k. I also guess being on DDR5 help with performance versus DDR4. One of the reason why the I3 lose to the I7 in certain games, it because of the lack of core
Games are trash dont use cores look at the charts
test i9 119900k vs i5 14600k
10700k for low price OK, for fair price - choice 12400f. Also 12100f is good, but 13100f and 14100f, 13400f and 14400f waste of money(50% more average price for 1-6% better perfomance) )
I dont know what gpu to change my 3050 with I have a 10700k can someone please please please help me
get a 3080 or rx6800/6800xt whichever is cheaper in your area
i3 is not prefering games is for work i5 up is for gaming for this i7 batter
Qual o melhor galera?
Здесь не совсем точный тест, разный сокет, разные материнские платы, разная оперативная память, совсем другая пропускная способность во всём.
И цена разная в 2 раза , но это не мешает им.
Looking at all these video. It seem its nonsensical to buy those costly i7 and i9 for just buy a cheap i3 or cheap i5. Put it on a cheap board game on it for 1-2 years than buy another. These cheaper i3 and i5 are priced really low so their resale value is actually very good. Much better than a i7 and i9. So basically this should be very affordable.
Процессоры не только для игр берут, для разных задач.
My 4 years old pc is not happy looking at this :(
it's enough, bottleneck with a CPU like this will only become an issue if you want to play online games at 144hz.
@@Daniel-oc8sx its not about that it's about the difference a 4 years can make ,
anyway I'm buying a new pc
i7 14the gen
DDR5
4080 super
I need to play at 4K
see you in 4 years Insha'Allah when @TestingGames compare my pc to a low tear one lol
@@TheXuNiQue That's a good new purchase, congrats for your new PC. See you in 4 years, I will upgrade to at some point.
@@Daniel-oc8sx Thank you and i hope you have a smooth and good upgrade .
i3 14100f vs r5 5600 plz.
they will trade blows becuz r5 5600 similar to i7-10700K/i9-9900K
5600 vs 14100f 🙏
12100f=13100F=14100F
PCI 4.0 help a lot.
nope
@@m8x425 Twice bandwidth. For 4090 it's matter.
first
Так не правильно тестишь процессоры
Настройки графики должны быть минимальным чтобы не было упора в видеокарту
Pretty incredible what a lowly i3 will do these days, I would not buy it personally but it is fairly impressive for what it is
It's not lowly at all and the difference is 4 generations. Compare a 4th Gen i3 to 8th Gen and the difference would have been similar at the time.
@@ag891213th gen and 14th gen i3 is pretty much just slightly overclocked 12th gen i3
just bclk overclock your 12th gen i3 lol
@@manusiaorang2842 and 8th Gen is just overclocked 6th Gen. What's you point lol
@@ag8912 well that depends on your point
if there's none then mine has none
@@ag8912 and that's just wrong 8th gen is alot better than 6th gen
there's a reason why people say get "8th gen" and not "get 6th, 7th, or 8th"
6:51 the horse 💀
Thanks for testing the 10700K, it's interesting to see how it ages.
Was this with Core Isolation 'Off'?
The 10700K has way more cores, despite the far superior IPC of Alder Lake and derivatives, when a game wants more cores and threads it doesn't matter.
@@saricubra2867 ??
@@saricubra2867core isolation ... a security feature lol
@@ji8651 4 cores vs 8.
The i7-10700K and RTX 3080 combo is still great in 2024. Intel 15th Gen and GeForce 50 will be the time that most will upgrade. Cant wait to run the Core Ultra 7 265K and RTX 5080! I've been saving up since 2020 for it. The i7 + 80 tier combo for the last 10 years has been simply the best for gaming. No need for an i9 and a 90 tier. Back then, they were Xeons and Titans.
Ryzen *800x3d is better for gaming. But with 3080 you can wait rtx6080 without any problems, if you don’t use 4K monitor
@@fpshunter Since 2016 ive been on a 4 year upgrade cycle, with the i7 as my main choice. Both my 10700K and 6700K with my 1080 served me well, I dont think i'll be getting the 9800X3D when it launches.
@@RobloxianX I guess traditions is not a good way when you buy an electronic devices and choose it only by vendor
so i5 12400F still be the best budget cpu for gaming
13400f I guess. But it depends on your country
@@fpshunter yup, you're right, maybe 13400f will later
But until now 12400f still have a good price, about more than 100usd a little bit
r5600: take my beer
Above 120USD yeah, also the R5 5600
@@immortxlz it depends on the price in your place, in my place r5 5600 has the same price with 12400f
So….. 10700 is better than 14100 for gaming?
Not always, and not in all games
in some games yes, in my opinion the i7 is still better because of the 8 cores, especially in work tasks
But the efficiency is worse. @@TestingGames
I think that the DD5 ram does a lot of differences in games
@@marcelo_anselmo_levy No it's not. :)
Не объективный тест, память на разных частотах работает. i3 14100 поставьте тоже 3600Мгц и сравните.
i3 is only 4 core and not enough for new games.
Bro said not enough for gaming when the games shown in the video run with 100+ fps lmao
Intel 15th gen be like: refreshed refresh!
i9 15900k will have 6.3 ghz turbo, compared to i9 14900k, which had 6.0 ghz
We don't care if your cooler won't handle this power!
And also we prepared a special edition i9 15900ks with 6.5ghz turbo!
We are still in the same stone age 10nm process **people laughing**
I hope not for Intel's sake. The Core Ultra 9 285k is supposedly on track.
@@m8x425 wtf is number 285k 💀
15th gen isn't a refresh but a completely new chip fabricated on 3nm Architecture.
@@computerscience1101 yeak ik
How is intel lithography stoneage? U have literally 24 cores thats impressive maybe not as much as 10 core 14nm but still. Amd still stuck on 8 core cpus
A theoretical Ryzen 3 with 3D cache could still be a helluva budget gaming CPU.
Generally, the last Ryzen 3 that weren't strapped off cache were 3100 / 3300x (with the latter doing pretty impressibly upon launch in 2020).
6 to 8 cores with at least 4.4GHz clock speed is the best for gaming. Some games are optimized to utilize certain number of cores and some games run very poorly with 16+ cores.
What I'm about to say explains everything all at once, yet explains nothing at all, in terms of how a computer actually functions.
Okay, are you ready for it? Electricity follows the path of least resistance. . . 💀😂😂😂
Спасибо вам за проделанную работу!!!
The architecture is giving powers to the 14th generation Intel processors.
And problems 😂
""2 years
I would say its incorrect to compare it on two different ddr platforms. ddr 4 against ddr 5 . Otherwise we need to see price comparicement. Im pretty sure that 1200 cheaper, and if we speak not only gaming , 10700k platform is better choice especially for 4090
Who pairs a 4099 with an i3????. Why not use a budget card,makes more sense based on who would buy an i3
nobody ever does that obviously but since this is a benchmark testing, they wanted to make sure that there will be no gpu bottlenecking whatsoever - if they did this with a budget card, both cpu would give the same result in every title selected and render the whole purpose of the testing meaningless - for example, both cpu would give you 90 FPS in a title with a budget card because the gpu would be the limiting factor not the cpu
@@SashuratedOooooooh, I get now. Thanks for the feedback 👍🏿
The i7 wins when the game uses a lot more GPU than the i3, not sure why it uses more GPU at same settings.
In Ghost of tsushima is it using only 30 % of the CPU
goes to show that Quad-Cores are riding off into the sunset
🔥
4 year of difference between a 8 core and a 4 core?
i3 good
Thanks!
First
And here is me, watching this with my i5 6600k😂
Он ещё тащит 😎
What a scam the i3. 12th i3 have 6c
There's no current desktop i3 cpu with 6 cores, get your facts right
source: trust me bro
I do not understand this testing and results, like Hogwarts for example - both cpu and gpu doing nothing and still fps is only 47-49 - so there's obviously a bottleneck somewhere, where exactly?
Unreal engine
Stop talking shit
I3 12100f is the best budget king . Beats i7 😂
14100f top👍
4c its not enought. You need 6c +12 threads
12100f>>>
Love from Bangladesh❤️🇧🇩 please pin📌