@@jaretco6423 they never had a “grudge” just a lot of the games just weren’t that good back then. Even then, sonic adventure 2 and generations both got over a 7. Sonic adventure got a low score in 1999, but I think it evens it out when sonic pocket adventure got a 10/10 which was def biased. Unleashed was super unfair I will give you that but that guy who did review that game has been fired for over a decade so you can’t really use him to represent ign when he got fired for probably being a poor representation.
As a sonic fan I am so confused as to how this even happened but on the other hand I'm kinda pissed that a handful of Nintendo fans are attacking sonic fans over this.
Ok, honestly, people are taking the scores too seriously, like, it's IGN, this are the same people who gave OG Mario 3D World a score of 9 but then gave the switch version (which came with extra content in the form of Bowser's Fury) a 7. Like, how is ,what is basically, the same game with additional content get an even lower score? Even assuming Bowser's Fury was bad, which it very much isn't, how does that diminish the quality of the base game? Where's the logic there?!
Or that infamous review of 4.9 on Explorers of Sky when time and darkness got 5.6. That review is still getting salty comments to this day, that game still has an active enough fanbase to have it's own romhacking tools made for it. you know what they say, you can't spell ignorant without IGN.
Yeah I'm not sure why people are freaking out about it now, this is just to be expected with IGN at this point, their reviewers have wildly different scoring criteria and are often unfair about how they score things. Because it seems like they don't have more than 1 person working on the review score, which they absolutely should have someone else reading it, because some of their people are way to harsh or way too praiseworthy of every single game they review. They should at the very least have one other person questioning some choices the person who is making the review makes, saying "is this really a fair criticism or compliment?", or "should this one aspect really affect the score to this extent?"
The biggest blunder for me is Sonic Unleashed. I don't understand how a gane with polished gameplay, functional mechanics, and great graphics got a lower score than Sonic 06. It honestly deserved something around an 8 like the critics did
IGN is going too far as it was in the past, we all remember infamous sonic unleashed review, pokemon 3ds title with TOO MUCH WATER, and the ridiculous Call Of Duty Games With 9's & 10's (Edit: They Also Give A New Dragon Ball Game A 7, on same weekend that give SXSG a 9, Which To Be Completely Honest, IGN is worse Then Cancer)
And the two much water thing was about how the game had to many water pokemon and you could easily beat 90 percent of the game with a couple of strong electric pokemon making the other pokemon useless also I don't know if you know this but it not just one person who does reviews on ign more then one person does them and they all have different taste
Honestly if the reviewer for Spraking Zero had been open about how much he played the game then the backlash for that review wouldn't have been so bad. But the game literally had an easy mode for them for the bosses and he even admitted to not even playing some of the game modes yet still went to say they were bad.
It’s one damn review plus it’s IGN so it shouldn’t be trusted in the first place also Mario and Luigi brothership has mostly positive reviews on Metacritic you’re all blowing this out of proportion both games are really good
Disclaimer: Please know that my thoughts come from a wildly incomplete playthrough of Brothership ( just past first major lighthouse), so what's said in my comment is likely to change. To me, I imagine IGN was just too dumb to remember that Brothership and Shadow Generations are aiming for very different kinds of experiences, probably with different target audiences, so their priorities weren't on the same footing. I feel both dev teams did a solid job polishing the minute "game feel" that each game needed for a firm foundation, then went back and made sure everything else had a good enough quality to maintain player engagement and a well rounded experience.
I've seen countless reviews of Brothership and I find the negative comments on pace to be ridiculous. I've just cleared lottacoin island and the pace has been spot on. Bosses are unique and spread out, and the game keeps feeling fresh with side quests which feel deliberate and manageable, not a slog like others would have you assuming.
To be fair, Mario & Luigi: Brothership is an RPG that takes several hours to beat, whereas Shadow Generations is added content to a pre-existing game, with both taking a few hours to beat.
Demeech, arlo, and bitblock seem to be iffy on brothership so I think the ign reviewer was right on many issues. Also, it is not surprising og sonic generations is a great game.
I hate how some sonic fans just can’t enjoy the games without saying X game is worth than *insert latest sonic title* They don’t care about review scores, or they don’t matter…unless they are saying good things about Sonic. Man, this reminds me of a great video called “Sonic Fantears review” I think? He talks about the fanbases flaws and such with this sort of thing. Like now IGN is our friend cuz one individual reviewer said Brothership sucks? Like don’t get it twisted, Shadow Gens is a great game, but why can’t we just have it stand on its own merit? Sonic fans hate being compared to Mario, unless something scored better. As a sonic fan, I hate it here lmao That rant aside, great video. I’m lookin forward to Brothership myself.
That video was not good, not because his point was not Valid but the examples he was using of toxicity in the Sonic community was always 2010's Sonic fans harassing 2000's Sonic fans. Even if he didn't say it out loud he's slyly saying *they're* the issue instead of acknowledging all people from all eras can be toxic. I say this as a 2000's fan whose favourite game is Sonic Unleashed, he should've been more nuanced.
Me personally the only reason you should play Sonic x shadow generations is for the shadow campaign, so I recommend getting it on discount. the sonic campaign is horrible is the worst remaster I’ve seen, I much rather play the original on my pc, which I still do, but is a shame that that they had to ruin the sonic’s campaign.😔
@ id say what makes it so great is the package as a whole. Best modern boost game and a new game that’s actually fantastic. My biggest issue wit the game is the fact it’s so damn pathetic the best sonic game since base gens is sonic gens. The remaster is pathetic, hardly changing anything or fixing/polishing anything, but the bar is so low for ST ports that it’s a blessing it actually is functioning. Still, absolutely pathetic, but the game is still great to this day
@@ppo1502huh? It’s terrible because they changed a couple of lines and like 2 cutscenes? Do you only play the game because of dialogue? The gameplay and the plot are both unchanged
(This is to all Mario fanboys out there) Since I’m not a 7 year old sonic fanboy (I’m more of a Zelda person) I’ll say this: Sonic is a franchise that has a terrible reputation due to notorious games, and when their reputation sort of heals by diminishing Mario for once, we just gotta let the fandom celebrate. Hating on a sonic game that got better reception than a Mario game and attacking sonic fans *OVER A FRICKIN VIDEO GAME* is just sad, just because a game from a franchise you dislike has been dethroning your childhood icon doesn’t mean you should begin forming WW3. To put it simple, mario fans are hating and attacking sonic fans for the sole fact that they are jealous of Sonic’s growth.
@@Princeofdarkness45682 most of those good ratings are probably biased anyway but at least it's better than paper jam Edit: of course i'm gonna complain.. that's one of the purposes of the youtube reply section
I guess the disappointed comes in from not meeting quality standards of the other entries. But I only played Mario & Luigi Bowser’s Inside Story. And that game is arguably among the best in the series. I’m sure the guy has enough fan love knowledge, and just being super honest about his experience. And I completely agree with your points. We live in a strange timeline what the reception of each franchise are at the moment. Lol I’m sure this is a temporary situation.
I'm around 10 hours into Brothership and I'm enjoying it, but I think the guy who reviewed it on IGN was pretty fair about it, TBH. His criticisms haven't diminished my enjoyment too much, but I get where he's coming from.
They say that’s the problem. You are not really controlling Luigi. As Mario and Luigi newbie you don’t notice this. I’m a newbie too and I’m having fun with this game
they should let more people review in one game (10 people at least) with no bias opinion. They rate it then the final score will be judged by average score. That's more fair to make a review.
Idk about the brothership, I heard that some people don't like it because of the slow pacing, how long it takes to get New mechanics, And especially the worst idea ever, is having a time limit of your side quests, By that I mean you have to literally do all the side quests at the end of the game, All at the same time, just for you to go to the next level, That is the worst decision-making of all time, People may ask "Why is it bad? Isn't the idea of repayability?" And it's like, Yes, but also no at all, It's hard to explain, but I recommend searching it up the criticisms, you'll get the idea
It's about time a Sonic game got a higher review score than a Mario game! Sonic has gotten so much hate while Mario has gotten so much praise. I can't remember the last time a 3D Sonic game got a 9 on IGN (I'm saying 3D b/c I'm sure Mania got a 9). So, as a major Sonic Fan and a casual Mario fan (only like the 3D Super Mario Collect-a-thons (64, Sunshine, Galaxy, 3D World + Bowser's Fury, and Odyssey)) this makes me sooooooo happy! Just finished Shadow Generations Saturday night! I loved it! Even teared up a little at the end. 😢
It probably has to do with the fact that nintendo really stirred shit up in the past few months so ign's having none of it or something. I presonally enjoy both sega and nintendo games but i feel like nintendo deserves this slap on the cheek as a wake up call for their asshole moves.
This game review has nothing to do with that stuff, though these videos I left here should help clear things up . ruclips.net/video/36RBc-zJaWs/видео.htmlsi=dsnSkbE0a7r5CCog ruclips.net/video/VdpA4HVN7eg/видео.htmlsi=FBPNLZMnY0mLpFTd ruclips.net/video/xROhIpUvYK4/видео.htmlsi=lhrloLT9LbPyivWJ
These video are interesting. Ive told myself for years that no one care bout ign review is the overall popular vote that matters but it is interesting to see number one i was wrong and two how ign reviews actual effect ppl a lot
IGN give one of the Pokemon games i think a low score or something and say Too much water. They give cuphead a low score because they couldn't even beat the tutorial of it.
Can yall genuinely just be quiet? Stop beefing wit each other and be happy for each other. These are literally fictional characters. Sonic and Mario are canonically homies. The fans should be homiess as well. Real Mario fans would actually be happy for Sonic fans
Considering IGN are the same people who called RE6 racist because it had black zombies *even though the game takes place in Africa so no shit* they called it racist because of that?????
10:00 I mean can you blame us🙄😒, over the years Nintendo fan as be insulting us, criticising us and tell us that Sonic games are worse than trash and it doesn't help when IGN put more salt in the wound😵💀 while criticising our games🎮 so yeah I feel bad for them, but that's just karma😮💨😤
@@lunathevampwolfcat5296well Reddit says other wise sonic fans hate Mario more than Mario fans hate on Sonic and I include myself I don’t hate Sonic as a Mario fan I actually enjoy Sonic SOME of the game and the movies I personally didn’t like the Mario movie so there is that
Bruh we got 7 or under ratings from ign for almost all the sonic games, some of those games getting low reviews due to bias, skill issue or the littlest reason in the world and you dont see us attacking mario while they be getting 8 or over each new mario game, now brothership gets a 5 and everyone is going ballistic?
I have a crazy idea but here me out the reason sonic got a 7 and Mario got a 5 is because they where played and reviewed by two different people who have different taste in games and the person who played Sonic happen to like it more then the person who played the Mario like I said my idea is crazy but it might be true
Sonic game could be janky but so could Mario games I think that was more of a popularity thing with ign hating Sonic also for Mario my take on it MAN THEY DIDNT KNOW HOW TO PLAY
I look in comparison not only mario and luigi brother hood but new mario party i not only look the different of ign but audience ratings mario party is 3.7 and brotherhood is 3.8 sonic x shadow generation is 4.6 audience thats like the legend of Zelda tear of the kingdom fans so i was wonder how many did people buy sonic x shadow generation and how many sonic fans are there on this world it could be miss calculate but yeah ign did review on new super mario party got 9/10 and yet no one was talking
Look I love both Mario and Sonic but $60 Sonic dlc got a 9 but a $60 full Mario and Luigi game got a 5 there is something serious wrong with ign now Mario and Luigi brothership isn't a perfect game but I don't think the game deserves a 5 I think both Sonic shadow generations and Mario Luigi brothership is both a 8 out of 10 at least but I will never trust ign on any game
@@toxictrashpanda Yes, you're absolutely correct. A 5-year-old child thinks that a game made for 5-year-olds is mediocre - a 5/10. I am the target audience for this game, you and Nintendo should listen.
Bud stfu just because they give a game a good score doesn't mean that they are glazing. Look up the definition of glazing before yapping because the game u didn't like have a higher score
The new Sonic game is not even new. It just put Shadow in there and that it. Mario and Luigi new game is good. Look at it! The animation, gamesplay and effects. Like come on. Sonic games are cool and all but always be a third party character.
@@ayden6986bro what? The shadow portion of the game is completely new what are you on about. Yes brotherhood deserved better but that doesn’t mean shadow gens is bad now
If IGN didn't give 'Mario & Luigi: Brothership' A low score for not being 'woke enough', People wouldn't be rejecting them, and buying the game out of spite, and if 'Sonic/Shadow Generations' didn't get censored, fans would be looking at it more favorably.
Nintendo fanboys would’ve grabbed their torches and pitchforks regardless whether or not if woke statements were made. Just look at what happened when Jim Sterling gave Zelda breath of the wild a 7/10.
Remember when IGN praises Mario & gives most games an 10/10, but they hated Sonic and gives any game below 7? What happened there?
IGN hasn’t hated Sonic for a while now you’re just late. Sure this score is higher then usual but ign have been giving fair Sonic reviews recently
Fax@@unkownunkown2420
@unkownunkown2420 Yeah. I know. But back in the 2000's and even early 2011's, IGN use to had an grudge on Sonic because of his failures success.
The roles have reversed
@@jaretco6423 they never had a “grudge” just a lot of the games just weren’t that good back then. Even then, sonic adventure 2 and generations both got over a 7. Sonic adventure got a low score in 1999, but I think it evens it out when sonic pocket adventure got a 10/10 which was def biased. Unleashed was super unfair I will give you that but that guy who did review that game has been fired for over a decade so you can’t really use him to represent ign when he got fired for probably being a poor representation.
As a sonic fan I am so confused as to how this even happened but on the other hand I'm kinda pissed that a handful of Nintendo fans are attacking sonic fans over this.
I’m not pissed at sonic, I stoped taking ign seriously after the sonic unleashed review so I’m not surprised.
@ppo1502 Ign just needs to log off
Why can't we all just be friends...
@TorturedMongoose2003 that's what I think of all the time when it comes to both of these fandoms
@@jed4276Me too!❤💙
Ok, honestly, people are taking the scores too seriously, like, it's IGN, this are the same people who gave OG Mario 3D World a score of 9 but then gave the switch version (which came with extra content in the form of Bowser's Fury) a 7. Like, how is ,what is basically, the same game with additional content get an even lower score? Even assuming Bowser's Fury was bad, which it very much isn't, how does that diminish the quality of the base game? Where's the logic there?!
Or that infamous review of 4.9 on Explorers of Sky when time and darkness got 5.6. That review is still getting salty comments to this day, that game still has an active enough fanbase to have it's own romhacking tools made for it. you know what they say, you can't spell ignorant without IGN.
Yeah I'm not sure why people are freaking out about it now, this is just to be expected with IGN at this point, their reviewers have wildly different scoring criteria and are often unfair about how they score things. Because it seems like they don't have more than 1 person working on the review score, which they absolutely should have someone else reading it, because some of their people are way to harsh or way too praiseworthy of every single game they review. They should at the very least have one other person questioning some choices the person who is making the review makes, saying "is this really a fair criticism or compliment?", or "should this one aspect really affect the score to this extent?"
The biggest blunder for me is Sonic Unleashed. I don't understand how a gane with polished gameplay, functional mechanics, and great graphics got a lower score than Sonic 06. It honestly deserved something around an 8 like the critics did
@@potatoarcher3985 The logic is that those games were reviewed by different people. IGN isn't just one person.
IGN are a bunches of fakes who doesn’t know how to play game, give bad takes to movies. You might as well not take them serious
IGN is going too far as it was in the past, we all remember infamous sonic unleashed review, pokemon 3ds title with TOO MUCH WATER, and the ridiculous Call Of Duty Games With 9's & 10's
(Edit: They Also Give A New Dragon Ball Game A 7, on same weekend that give SXSG a 9, Which To Be Completely Honest, IGN is worse Then Cancer)
The person who gave the unleashed review has been fired for a long time
And the two much water thing was about how the game had to many water pokemon and you could easily beat 90 percent of the game with a couple of strong electric pokemon making the other pokemon useless also I don't know if you know this but it not just one person who does reviews on ign more then one person does them and they all have different taste
@@jsmith3946 they all have different person from these reviews and they needed to be kicked out from ign, apparently
Honestly if the reviewer for Spraking Zero had been open about how much he played the game then the backlash for that review wouldn't have been so bad. But the game literally had an easy mode for them for the bosses and he even admitted to not even playing some of the game modes yet still went to say they were bad.
IGN really gave concord a higher score than brothership and expected people to not be mad
Mario & Sonic Swapped:
Or switch places:
(Not disliking on Mario, they’re both pretty great!)
Yeah and it Doesn’t Matter which one is better
@ Mhm!
Make your own reviews people it does matter what ign or other reviewers think
You sir missed this 👑
@@randomguy8336 thx my man
It’s one damn review plus it’s IGN so it shouldn’t be trusted in the first place also Mario and Luigi brothership has mostly positive reviews on Metacritic you’re all blowing this out of proportion both games are really good
Yeah
Honestly, I just attribute this more to IGN being completely unreliable and an untrustworthy source for gaming news and reviews.
Disclaimer: Please know that my thoughts come from a wildly incomplete playthrough of Brothership ( just past first major lighthouse), so what's said in my comment is likely to change.
To me, I imagine IGN was just too dumb to remember that Brothership and Shadow Generations are aiming for very different kinds of experiences, probably with different target audiences, so their priorities weren't on the same footing.
I feel both dev teams did a solid job polishing the minute "game feel" that each game needed for a firm foundation, then went back and made sure everything else had a good enough quality to maintain player engagement and a well rounded experience.
I do think its about time that Sonic gets a much higher score than Mario, but in all honesty, IGN is known to give really bad scores to games
I've seen countless reviews of Brothership and I find the negative comments on pace to be ridiculous. I've just cleared lottacoin island and the pace has been spot on. Bosses are unique and spread out, and the game keeps feeling fresh with side quests which feel deliberate and manageable, not a slog like others would have you assuming.
To be fair, Mario & Luigi: Brothership is an RPG that takes several hours to beat, whereas Shadow Generations is added content to a pre-existing game, with both taking a few hours to beat.
I have reached the 20 hour playtime mark in brothership lmao
I feel like both should be 9
I used to be a pure sonic fan but now I’m both
That’s cool, Both Mario & Sonic are good, and I think they should be treated as equals.
Exactly There’s no need for the fighting when we can just be cool and enjoy games
@@hexaphone9417 Agreed, Trillion-Fold!👍
@@Jumpman-64i think so too
(I like Sonic more but I also like Mario)
@@saberspriteanimator6385 That’s-A-Cool!👍
Ah yes... Just like the Legend says.... "Sega Does What Nintendon't..."
I didn't bother listening to ign and other critics,
I just enjoy playing games, don't get me wrong...
Let’s go Sonic 🎉
Demeech, arlo, and bitblock seem to be iffy on brothership so I think the ign reviewer was right on many issues. Also, it is not surprising og sonic generations is a great game.
eh iam not that surprised sonic team saw the fan animations and games, they just needed to try more
You know that they're selling great while sparking zeros player base is already gone sonic x shadow generations will be game of the year
I hate how some sonic fans just can’t enjoy the games without saying X game is worth than *insert latest sonic title*
They don’t care about review scores, or they don’t matter…unless they are saying good things about Sonic. Man, this reminds me of a great video called “Sonic Fantears review” I think?
He talks about the fanbases flaws and such with this sort of thing. Like now IGN is our friend cuz one individual reviewer said Brothership sucks? Like don’t get it twisted, Shadow Gens is a great game, but why can’t we just have it stand on its own merit? Sonic fans hate being compared to Mario, unless something scored better. As a sonic fan, I hate it here lmao
That rant aside, great video. I’m lookin forward to Brothership myself.
That video was not good, not because his point was not Valid but the examples he was using of toxicity in the Sonic community was always 2010's Sonic fans harassing 2000's Sonic fans. Even if he didn't say it out loud he's slyly saying *they're* the issue instead of acknowledging all people from all eras can be toxic.
I say this as a 2000's fan whose favourite game is Sonic Unleashed, he should've been more nuanced.
Me personally the only reason you should play Sonic x shadow generations is for the shadow campaign, so I recommend getting it on discount. the sonic campaign is horrible is the worst remaster I’ve seen, I much rather play the original on my pc, which I still do, but is a shame that that they had to ruin the sonic’s campaign.😔
@@ppo1502 it's perfectly fine.
@ id say what makes it so great is the package as a whole. Best modern boost game and a new game that’s actually fantastic. My biggest issue wit the game is the fact it’s so damn pathetic the best sonic game since base gens is sonic gens. The remaster is pathetic, hardly changing anything or fixing/polishing anything, but the bar is so low for ST ports that it’s a blessing it actually is functioning. Still, absolutely pathetic, but the game is still great to this day
@@ppo1502huh? It’s terrible because they changed a couple of lines and like 2 cutscenes? Do you only play the game because of dialogue? The gameplay and the plot are both unchanged
(This is to all Mario fanboys out there) Since I’m not a 7 year old sonic fanboy (I’m more of a Zelda person) I’ll say this: Sonic is a franchise that has a terrible reputation due to notorious games, and when their reputation sort of heals by diminishing Mario for once, we just gotta let the fandom celebrate. Hating on a sonic game that got better reception than a Mario game and attacking sonic fans *OVER A FRICKIN VIDEO GAME* is just sad, just because a game from a franchise you dislike has been dethroning your childhood icon doesn’t mean you should begin forming WW3. To put it simple, mario fans are hating and attacking sonic fans for the sole fact that they are jealous of Sonic’s growth.
Really getting into Brothership rn - I'm really enjoying the gameplay loop
MY GOD how the tables have turned nintendo
Mario and Luigi brothership has a good score on Metacritic it’s got mostly good ratings the across the board so what are you babbling about?
@@Princeofdarkness45682 IGN is the main focus of the video not Metacritic and I guarantee you didn’t even watch the video
@@Princeofdarkness45682
Brothership:7.7 on imdb
Shadow generations:8.8 on imdb
Way better rating imo
@@Princeofdarkness45682 most of those good ratings are probably biased anyway but at least it's better than paper jam
Edit: of course i'm gonna complain.. that's one of the purposes of the youtube reply section
@@poyrazunlu there not biased it’s just a really good game that’s why it has mostly positive reviews your just looking for somthing to complain about
I guess the disappointed comes in from not meeting quality standards of the other entries. But I only played Mario & Luigi Bowser’s Inside Story. And that game is arguably among the best in the series. I’m sure the guy has enough fan love knowledge, and just being super honest about his experience. And I completely agree with your points. We live in a strange timeline what the reception of each franchise are at the moment. Lol I’m sure this is a temporary situation.
I'm around 10 hours into Brothership and I'm enjoying it, but I think the guy who reviewed it on IGN was pretty fair about it, TBH.
His criticisms haven't diminished my enjoyment too much, but I get where he's coming from.
You seem like one of the few people who actually watched the review lmao
@@Witchcraft_VR TBH, I think the hate IGN gets over their review scores is forced, and that most people don't bother to actually read them.
They say that’s the problem. You are not really controlling Luigi. As Mario and Luigi newbie you don’t notice this. I’m a newbie too and I’m having fun with this game
they should let more people review in one game (10 people at least) with no bias opinion. They rate it then the final score will be judged by average score. That's more fair to make a review.
Idk about the brothership, I heard that some people don't like it because of the slow pacing, how long it takes to get New mechanics,
And especially the worst idea ever, is having a time limit of your side quests,
By that I mean you have to literally do all the side quests at the end of the game, All at the same time, just for you to go to the next level,
That is the worst decision-making of all time,
People may ask "Why is it bad? Isn't the idea of repayability?"
And it's like, Yes, but also no at all,
It's hard to explain, but I recommend searching it up the criticisms, you'll get the idea
The tables have turned, irony.
It's about time a Sonic game got a higher review score than a Mario game! Sonic has gotten so much hate while Mario has gotten so much praise. I can't remember the last time a 3D Sonic game got a 9 on IGN (I'm saying 3D b/c I'm sure Mania got a 9). So, as a major Sonic Fan and a casual Mario fan (only like the 3D Super Mario Collect-a-thons (64, Sunshine, Galaxy, 3D World + Bowser's Fury, and Odyssey)) this makes me sooooooo happy! Just finished Shadow Generations Saturday night! I loved it! Even teared up a little at the end. 😢
It probably has to do with the fact that nintendo really stirred shit up in the past few months so ign's having none of it or something. I presonally enjoy both sega and nintendo games but i feel like nintendo deserves this slap on the cheek as a wake up call for their asshole moves.
This game review has nothing to do with that stuff, though these videos I left here should help clear things up .
ruclips.net/video/36RBc-zJaWs/видео.htmlsi=dsnSkbE0a7r5CCog
ruclips.net/video/VdpA4HVN7eg/видео.htmlsi=FBPNLZMnY0mLpFTd
ruclips.net/video/xROhIpUvYK4/видео.htmlsi=lhrloLT9LbPyivWJ
These video are interesting. Ive told myself for years that no one care bout ign review is the overall popular vote that matters but it is interesting to see number one i was wrong and two how ign reviews actual effect ppl a lot
Remember when they gave SONIC POCKET ADVENTURE a 10 IGN is goofy as hell.
It's funny to see Sonic outclass Mario after a long while (at least I think)
Both deserve 10/10
Sonic games are being scored higher than Mario games… Oh, what a time to be alive.
IGN give one of the Pokemon games i think a low score or something and say Too much water.
They give cuphead a low score because they couldn't even beat the tutorial of it.
Well Its because Sega does what nintendont
@@luciehaberzettlova7240 yeah it call finally making a good game.
(Frontiers and super star are good to lol)
That’s because Mario scored super low, it’s literally a 5 that’s not difficult to beat whatsoever
You know what let sonic fans have something good before Mario party jamboree inevitably outsells shadow generations
Womp womp, as they say
@@Ichi108 Back in my day there was no, “womp womp” but rather, “Too bad So sad”
Cry more, shadow generations is better
Can yall genuinely just be quiet? Stop beefing wit each other and be happy for each other. These are literally fictional characters. Sonic and Mario are canonically homies. The fans should be homiess as well. Real Mario fans would actually be happy for Sonic fans
@@datonebigguy NO 06 IS BETTER THEN THAT PILE OF SH
Considering IGN are the same people who called RE6 racist because it had black zombies *even though the game takes place in Africa so no shit* they called it racist because of that?????
the only people i’ve seen bashing brothership are nitpickers
2 different people, simple as that
Once I heard all the sugar in the voice of the guy who reviewed Mario Luigi I laughed
10:00 I mean can you blame us🙄😒, over the years Nintendo fan as be insulting us, criticising us and tell us that Sonic games are worse than trash and it doesn't help when IGN put more salt in the wound😵💀 while criticising our games🎮 so yeah I feel bad for them, but that's just karma😮💨😤
Didn't sonic fans hate Mario fans?
@@FireFlowerDav1d no we don't, is mostly Mario fans that hater us 🙄😒😮💨
@@lunathevampwolfcat5296 I'd say their equally toxic
@@lunathevampwolfcat5296well Reddit says other wise sonic fans hate Mario more than Mario fans hate on Sonic and I include myself I don’t hate Sonic as a Mario fan I actually enjoy Sonic SOME of the game and the movies I personally didn’t like the Mario movie so there is that
There isn’t need for any of this fighting, we all like playing games at the end of the day
5.0
- Too Much Brother
For one time Sonic did better with IGN than Mario
Bruh we got 7 or under ratings from ign for almost all the sonic games, some of those games getting low reviews due to bias, skill issue or the littlest reason in the world and you dont see us attacking mario while they be getting 8 or over each new mario game, now brothership gets a 5 and everyone is going ballistic?
This is crazy
Mario needs to try something new, Gives us a new villain I'm sick of Boswer all the time
I don't really care about Mario and Luigi. Shadow Generations is a masterpiece.
IGN just feeling a bit grumpy rn
Because Shadow generations is simply a better game. Simple as that.
True
I have a crazy idea but here me out the reason sonic got a 7 and Mario got a 5 is because they where played and reviewed by two different people who have different taste in games and the person who played Sonic happen to like it more then the person who played the Mario like I said my idea is crazy but it might be true
Sonic game could be janky but so could Mario games I think that was more of a popularity thing with ign hating Sonic also for Mario my take on it MAN THEY DIDNT KNOW HOW TO PLAY
I look in comparison not only mario and luigi brother hood but new mario party i not only look the different of ign but audience ratings mario party is 3.7 and brotherhood is 3.8 sonic x shadow generation is 4.6 audience thats like the legend of Zelda tear of the kingdom fans so i was wonder how many did people buy sonic x shadow generation and how many sonic fans are there on this world it could be miss calculate but yeah ign did review on new super mario party got 9/10 and yet no one was talking
Look I love both Mario and Sonic but $60 Sonic dlc got a 9 but a $60 full Mario and Luigi game got a 5 there is something serious wrong with ign now Mario and Luigi brothership isn't a perfect game but I don't think the game deserves a 5 I think both Sonic shadow generations and Mario Luigi brothership is both a 8 out of 10 at least but I will never trust ign on any game
Nope, it's completely fair. Grow up.
@Ichi108 the fact that you went out of your way to tell me to grew shows that you are still just a 5 year old child
@@toxictrashpanda Yes, you're absolutely correct. A 5-year-old child thinks that a game made for 5-year-olds is mediocre - a 5/10. I am the target audience for this game, you and Nintendo should listen.
SXS Gens is $50.
I’m not well versed into Mario but Mf you don’t need to try to take down a game Just to make your point
Then again Sonic fans complain more than any other gaming fans so this isn’t surprising but Brothership is the best game
No one knows about the 4Kids One Piece opening. Lame
Don’t worry ign is just glazing because it’s the year of shadow and whatever
I would gladly take brothership over Sonic x shadow generations
Bud stfu just because they give a game a good score doesn't mean that they are glazing. Look up the definition of glazing before yapping because the game u didn't like have a higher score
@ who tf are you talking to
Ign is glazing because it’s the year of shadow also I’m not your bud go sit down some place 💀
I bet bro never even played neither game lmao
@Witchcraft_VR nah word 😅💀
@@dallasm2597too bad, shadow generations is just better. The sooner you accept that the better
All the youtubers making the same video with the same layout lol
Yo ho ho he took a bite of gum gum
IGN is like crap apples and they are more apart of the shadow nation
From what I saw about both games I really think both deserve an solid 8/10
I don't care about ign
Mario and Luigi Brothership is mid honestly...
Simple: The new Sonic game was good, the new Mario and Luigi wasn't
The new Sonic game is not even new. It just put Shadow in there and that it.
Mario and Luigi new game is good. Look at it! The animation, gamesplay and effects. Like come on. Sonic games are cool and all but always be a third party character.
@@ayden6986bro what? The shadow portion of the game is completely new what are you on about. Yes brotherhood deserved better but that doesn’t mean shadow gens is bad now
@@ayden6986and what does being a 3rd party character have to do with anything? All this comment tells me is that your super biased
actual sonic and shadow better than actual mario and luigi
You know that’s cap but whatever I’m not even going to entertain that
If IGN didn't give 'Mario & Luigi: Brothership' A low score for not being 'woke enough', People wouldn't be rejecting them, and buying the game out of spite, and if 'Sonic/Shadow Generations' didn't get censored, fans would be looking at it more favorably.
Nintendo fanboys would’ve grabbed their torches and pitchforks regardless whether or not if woke statements were made. Just look at what happened when Jim Sterling gave Zelda breath of the wild a 7/10.
It's not controversial. It's based. 🎉
What's based?
@@Ichi108 Again mario fan boy, can’t you and the sonic fanboys just be friends?
@@Witchcraft_VR we can be friends, but the reality is certain