it was really a very awesome lecture ,where things are taught in very simplified manner because aristotle is interpreted in different ways by various scholars and the main argument has been put forward in this lecture is well retainable..!!
Democracy is when those who make decisions on your behalf have the duty to ask for your consent first. Today's republics are actually modern oligarchies where the interest groups of the rich are arbitrated by the people, that is, you can choose from which table of the rich you will receive crumbs. The "fatigue" of democracy occurs when there is a big difference between the interests of the elected and the voters, thus people lose confidence in the way society functions. As a result, poor and desperate citizens will vote with whoever promises them a lifeline, i.e. populists or demagogues. The democratic aspect is a collateral effect in societies where the economy has a strong competitive aspect, that is, the interests of those who hold the economic power in society are divergent. Thus those whealty, and implicitly with political power in society, supervise each other so that none of them have undeserved advantages due to politics. For this reason, countries where mineral resources have an important weight in GDP are not democratic (Russia, Venezuela, etc.), because a small group of people can exploit these resources in their own interest. In poor countries (Romania, Bulgaria, Greece, etc.) the main exploited resource may even be the state budget, as they have convergent interests in benefiting, in their own interest, from this resource. It is easy to see if it is an oligarchy because in a true democracy laws would not be passed that would not be in the interest of the many. The first modern oligarchy appeared in England at the end of the 17th century. After the bourgeois revolution led by Cromwell succeeded, the interest groups of the rich were unable to agree on how to divide their political power in order not to reach the dictatorship of one. The solution was to appoint a king to be the arbiter. In republics, the people are the arbiter, but let's not confuse the possibility of choosing which group will govern you with democracy, that is, with the possibility of citizens deciding which laws to pass and which not to. The solution is modern direct democracy in which every citizen can vote, whenever he wants, over the head of the parliamentarian who represents him. He can even dismiss him if the majority of his voters consider that he does not correctly represent their interests. It's like when you have to build a house and you choose the site manager and the architect, but they don't have the duty to consult with you. The house will certainly not look the way you want it, but the way they want it, and it is more certain that you will be left with the money given and without the house. It is strange that outside of the political sphere, nowhere, in any economic or sports activity, will you find someone elected to a leadership position and who has failure after failure and is fired only after 4 years. We, the voters, must be consulted about the decisions and if they have negative effects we can dismiss them at any time, let's not wait for the soroco to be fulfilled, because we pay, not them. In any company, the management team comes up with a plan approved by the shareholders. Any change in this plan must be re-approved by the shareholders and it is normal because the shareholders pay.
आपका योगदान हिंदी में भी हो तो अच्छा । CEC UGC से एक रिक्वेस्ट है कि आप हिंदी में भी उपलोड कीजिए। एक और विनती है आप लेक्चर का PDF भी sare करिए। Note बनाने में सहायक होगा। इंग्लिश में समझ में आ जाती है लेकिन इसको रटना पड़ता है। हिंदी में सुन लेने के बाद रटना नहीं पड़ता है। हिंदी बाले स्टूडेंट के बारे में भी सोचे
This wasn't so helpful, he is not elaborating things, the only word he is using again and again is basically and basically and basically. Can u please upload some lectures.
Iftikhar Barvi you are absolutely right. way of teaching isnt helpful. speech delivery is very poor. i think that he should teach in his language so that concepts flow from him. however as lecture is free so we should thank him.,
![NOSFERATU - Official Trailer [HD] - Only In Theaters December 25](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nulvWqYUM8k/mqdefault.jpg)
It won't be do Helpful if this is the only source you're sticking to, you'll have to supplement it with Reading from some books!
Thank you Sir
Your classes in English is very useful for many aspirants
it was really a very awesome lecture ,where things are taught in very simplified manner
because aristotle is interpreted in different ways by various scholars and the main argument has been put forward in this lecture is well retainable..!!
Kkkkkkk
Dr Satish Sir's classes are enlightening
It is sufficient about Aristotle
Thankyou sir for this wonderful lecture.
Good watch...clearity about Aristotle s though about State Citizenship Revolution etc
'Citizenship' was to be given by the job or type of work one does in a state ( Aristotle )
Very nicely explained the concept.. reading once aristotle philosophy will make the concept more smooth
nice sir for aristotal thought motivation of your teaching method thanks
Love u sir🖤
great lecture
Concept of state 10minutes, citizenship 18minutes
Nice explanations
Thank you so much sir
Every thing should get his due through 'Merit' in a society
18:50 citizenship
awesome sir ....viva la sir
Democracy is when those who make decisions on your behalf have the duty to ask for your consent first. Today's republics are actually modern oligarchies where the interest groups of the rich are arbitrated by the people, that is, you can choose from which table of the rich you will receive crumbs.
The "fatigue" of democracy occurs when there is a big difference between the interests of the elected and the voters, thus people lose confidence in the way society functions. As a result, poor and desperate citizens will vote with whoever promises them a lifeline, i.e. populists or demagogues.
The democratic aspect is a collateral effect in societies where the economy has a strong competitive aspect, that is, the interests of those who hold the economic power in society are divergent. Thus those whealty, and implicitly with political power in society, supervise each other so that none of them have undeserved advantages due to politics. For this reason, countries where mineral resources have an important weight in GDP are not democratic (Russia, Venezuela, etc.), because a small group of people can exploit these resources in their own interest. In poor countries (Romania, Bulgaria, Greece, etc.) the main exploited resource may even be the state budget, as they have convergent interests in benefiting, in their own interest, from this resource. It is easy to see if it is an oligarchy because in a true democracy laws would not be passed that would not be in the interest of the many.
The first modern oligarchy appeared in England at the end of the 17th century. After the bourgeois revolution led by Cromwell succeeded, the interest groups of the rich were unable to agree on how to divide their political power in order not to reach the dictatorship of one. The solution was to appoint a king to be the arbiter. In republics, the people are the arbiter, but let's not confuse the possibility of choosing which group will govern you with democracy, that is, with the possibility of citizens deciding which laws to pass and which not to.
The solution is modern direct democracy in which every citizen can vote, whenever he wants, over the head of the parliamentarian who represents him. He can even dismiss him if the majority of his voters consider that he does not correctly represent their interests.
It's like when you have to build a house and you choose the site manager and the architect, but they don't have the duty to consult with you. The house will certainly not look the way you want it, but the way they want it, and it is more certain that you will be left with the money given and without the house. It is strange that outside of the political sphere, nowhere, in any economic or sports activity, will you find someone elected to a leadership position and who has failure after failure and is fired only after 4 years. We, the voters, must be consulted about the decisions and if they have negative effects we can dismiss them at any time, let's not wait for the soroco to be fulfilled, because we pay, not them. In any company, the management team comes up with a plan approved by the shareholders. Any change in this plan must be re-approved by the shareholders and it is normal because the shareholders pay.
Very helpful, thank you sir
Thank you Sir.
Education was considerd as an important tool by Aristotle
Good lecture sir
please upload lecture on Machiavelli also
Superb
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Thank u very much
Very good
thanx a lot
Can you please upload some more lectures of MP Jain in English.
Bhai, have patience to bear the first 10 mins.
Aristotle ideas on slaves, education and citizenship is good but the discussion on states isn't good.
Justice was considerd radical by Aristotle
आपका योगदान हिंदी में भी हो तो अच्छा ।
CEC UGC से एक रिक्वेस्ट है कि आप हिंदी में भी उपलोड कीजिए।
एक और विनती है आप लेक्चर का PDF भी sare करिए।
Note बनाने में सहायक होगा।
इंग्लिश में समझ में आ जाती है लेकिन इसको रटना पड़ता है।
हिंदी में सुन लेने के बाद रटना नहीं पड़ता है।
हिंदी बाले स्टूडेंट के बारे में भी सोचे
Super sir
good lecture
Impotance of the state has to be acknowldged by the individual
Sir u r explained huge but it is simple topic 😅😅😅😅
Self interest* should be checked in some cases punished also by govt
Magnum opus = most imprtant book was 'politics' by Aristotle
thnaks sir
subtitles would be more helpful
Oo
Destructive justice
Distributive ⚖️ justice - in legislative - allocates honours nd wealth
Retributive - implies on loss and payment to be made for loss
Commutative - deals with voluntary transaction in the society
Sir thoda Hindi me bhi lecture de dete toh Hindi medium students ko bhi fayada ho jata.....
Judges should be employed
In the past citizens had very less rights
Democracy
This wasn't so helpful, he is not elaborating things, the only word he is using again and again is basically and basically and basically.
Can u please upload some lectures.
Iftikhar Barvi you are absolutely right. way of teaching isnt helpful. speech delivery is very poor. i think that he should teach in his language so that concepts flow from him. however as lecture is free so we should thank him.,
bhai kya comment Kiya aapne
In 1hr span, it's impossible to elaborate everything... anyway Flow is good
He was a realist and not idealist ( Aristotle )
10:46 state
The fake accents 😁
Labour was debard from participating in governance ( only intellectuals were allowed )
thank you very much sir
thank you very much sir