I made the grave mistake to pre-order before they even showed the cinematic trailer. I was so starved for a good FPS game, CoD cold War had just come out. And I was so thirsty for Battlefield again. Everyone has that "one" game that changed them. Some it was Fallout 76, No Man Sky, Cyberpunk etc. For me, it was Battlefield 2042
I'm in the "I'll believe it when I see it" camp as well. The pressure all the studios are going to come under from idiotic suits at EA to make a monetization machine over a genuine player experience is going to be immense. EA can't help them selves and they have proven time and time again that it's the connection to the player's wallet that matters most to them regardless of the lip service they have given the community over the years.
That is very true, but I simply don’t think that way of treating their customers is viable anymore long term. The gaming competition is sky high, and there are loads of studios and publishers making incredible gaming experiences. If they keep failing, and keep destroying franchises because of short term greed, they will eventually suffer. Obviously they are hugely profitable right now, but I can’t see that lasting if they keep destroying franchises. Also another trainwreck game like 2042 would be absolutely terrible PR. I hope, maybe naively, that they have somewhat learned their lesson. Battlefield and its fans really deserve a game that finally lives up to the Battlefield name again.
@@theysellsoulscheaphere8501EXACTLY. This is what I genuinely don’t understand… Quality will always make way more money long term. Maybe it really wasn’t EA’s fault and it was just actually bad gaming design decisions from Dice itself that made 2042 so terrible. EA should have enough smart people to know that games like 2042 are terrible for their long term value as a company.
@@juliusjacob1416are you just not aware of the success warhammer 40k space marine 2 has had..? It sold 2 million copies within the first week. Treating your customers well and giving them a game that’s meant for them instead of pandering or trying to be like everyone else is 100% viable long term, IF the company just sacks up and does it. People speak with their wallets and time. And space marine 2 disproves what you just said .
Battlefield has always tried to make you feel immersed in its namesake, a battlefield. They did this well by making every player a nameless soldier. When they added these specialists, it totally change that feeling and made it feel like Overwatch. You’d see 6-7 clones of each character with the same voices and it was very strange and pulled you out of that feeling.
Aren’t the people who designed bf3/4 away from dice? I’m not sure that we can trust them that they know what they talking about. Just have a look on 2042.
Zampella strikes me as 1) knowing a game should be fun and 2) knowing how to get execs off his back,@@wurstfachverkaeufer He earned my respect w Titanfall, Titanfall 2 which addressed its flaws and Apex Legends … EA’s only free and successful game. Prove me right, Vince, please! ✌🏼😃👍🏼
Vince knows what he's doing. In fact getting the "core" back was the thing I was hoping they would address at whatever point, so hearing him say that is good. the old devs from 3&4 are long gone though, so we can only hope that the he and the rest of the leadership are capable of directing the current staff in the proper direction.
I have no doubt in Vince’s leadership, i do however have doubt in the team of Dice… they don’t even play Battlefield themself’s… you can’t create something good in a genre you have no interest OR experience in
They should add more features like close quarters voip ,dragging wounded soldiers, and good voice acting like screaming when getting hit or suppressed like insurgency sandstorm , it would be cool and immersive
I just don't think western triple A developers can stop themselves from creating monetization content long enough to make a game that doesn't suck on the most fundamental levels.
Hopefully they give us nameless soldiers, unlike BFV and 2042. 2042 already has good restraint on releasing goofy ass gun/gear skins, so hopefully BF2025 just gives us some decent weapon skins. Player skins will probably still happen, it is what it is. So long as I don't get rendezooked by fucking Nicki Minaj, or a basketball team mascot, I'll be fine with it.
Yep this is my general concern also. Like what happened with cinema industry, where main studios are just squizing their milk cows to secure their financial return, instead of really trying to make something good, unique, original or artistic. Same seems to be happening with videogaming industry, where good titles will come only from little studios. Hopefully we will not reach that point.
I hope they go back to what made BF3 and BF1 so special, graphics wise aswell because the gritty-ness and cinematic, real like visuals of BF1 with the BF3 mechanics would just bloom with the community right now!
@@lumbagoboi1649 exactly and that’s also what made me love BF1 so much, after Bf3, BF1 felt like you were in the game with the crazy cinematics and sounds and explosions.. it is by far one of my best gaming experiences along with BF3 ofc
I agree but I would say I want the Most focus on core gameplay and map design. Many games nowa day are great even without spectacular visuals. I want something that has replay ability
Bf1 had the best gameplay mechanics of any battlefield. The diving and leaning over cover, with destructible ground to hide in craters. It was so easy to snake and sleuth around the map. It was amazing
Lets be real, they deserve no credit or praise for confirming these features as they're the bare minimum core features BF titles should have. It's the equivalent of a car manufacturer saying "ok so our next car is going to have wheels, a drivers seat, and an engine". They probably saw all the BF content creators starting to cover other games (like Delta Force) since there was literally nothing to talk about with 2042 or BF in general and thought oh shit we need to "leak" something to be relevant again.
Very possible that delta force existence made them release this short info. I just hope that by some miracle these 2 factors: 1) more years of development, from what we know that wasn't reseted 3 times. 2) delta force that might steal their player base that is already small compared to what it used to. These 2 factors should guarantee a better product than 2042 or maybe bf5. But knowing these devils they might just do a concord
If they make a good battlefield all Dice/EA will get from me in the base standard game and nothing else from. F*ck them and any micro transactions they’ll be shoving in our faces.
He could have just clipped this potion from his stream and uploaded it yet he takes his time and makes a whole separate video. Dedication and professionalism as usual. 💯
The lead map designer for the next BF is boasting about how great the maps are going to be (the same guy who did the 2042 maps) and then the lead UI designer on Twitter is being all proud of himself that there will be a Scoreboard on launch. Things that I deem the absolute bare minimum standard are apparently big news now.
You’re 100% on point here. Not so much on the stream on everything, but you’re a great point of info for BF. I PRAY, Vince pushes them into a win. BF needs a win.
An early upload?? We’re getting spoiled. I really appreciate how vocal Vince is being and isn’t afraid to state things like BF3/4 was prime Battlefield.
Honestly I want clans back in BF, some of my fondest memories are with those communities. Not in closed discord spaces, but a way to connect players solely in BF. I even played in a few clan matches back in BF3/BF4. Freaking neat.. I just don't see that happening unless they go back to their roots.\
The Main Protagonist might be from the former Yugoslav Republic. The coastal area looks like Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, or Albania idk. I think EA is slowly hyping the game.
They need to be 100% honest with the community. It's the last chance that I believe every BF player will give them, just for the sake of the old days. All the creativity in BF1 and BF4, including Battlelog and network services, focusing on the quality of the experience, is the most important thing that all of us are going to focus on while we watch RUclipsrs' gameplay or try it ourselves. We are not going to look at cinematics or be happy about the promises or even pre-order like BF2042 did to us. "They have to choose either to regain BF players' trust or to scam them again to lose them forever."
For what it's worth, I'd say 'trust but verify'. Cheer on the Devs for positive signals but remain clear this'll be judged on substance, so make sure any Alphas / Betas are good quality. If they're bad, it'll trigger a run on the brand it might not survive. We can't do a 2042 launch again -- get it right, even if you need to delay.
can you imagine if they start promoting the game like bf3? all those trailers and stuff. bf3 was the first ever game i played on console. i fell in love with the game and i grinded every day to get better. I really hope they make something similar to that one.
Vince is the goat .. he created medal of honor , call of duty and now involved in the development of battlefield .. this is great man .. i have high hopes
one thing i really want is they took a step back graphically from bf1, look at bf2042 and bf1, i know which one looks so much better and its 5 years older. just listen to the community and they'll have a great battlefield
They didn’t make the graphics worse because they thought that’s what was best. The old talent is simply missing from the current studio so they are unable to recreate that magic
Been playing since 1942 and this new direction gives me hope the franchise will be back in good standing. At the very least it sounds like they are finally listening to what we've been begging for over a decade.
His words can be (and I believe they are) honest and sincere. However, the major question here is: Does he have the true power to steer Battlefield in that direction? I do believe that even in BF2042 some people had the motive to turn that game in the greatest with core community desires, but some upper “management” come and tear the draft for money that they actually lose for not following what made battlefield great. Side note here: I truly believe that every mistake battlefield made (no matter how bad they were) actually give the opportunity to make the next game the GOAT. They gotta try new things… The question is: Are they listening?
I've been gone for a minute, not when I hear BF news, I gotta come back to my boy enders. Thank you again for being a real one! I'm excited to see what happens. Especially the way this man was answering these questions.
3:13 notice how he said "do that *amazingly* well" This could very much be a reach, but to me that sounds that they know the next game needs to be *great* , not just good enough. Sounds like they know we'll all go to Delta Force if the next game isn't BF3 / BF4 level Could just be the usual EA corporate yap tho
The perfect setting for bf6. WW3 with the following factions for game release. Asia- CN,NK vs SK,JAP, PIL, US. Europe- UKR, Nato vs RU, CSTO. Middle East- US, ISR vs IRA, YEM, LEB. What do you guys think? What factions and, locations would you want to see later or at games release?
Or maybe just NATO in every continent NATO VS FICTIONAL ARAB FACTION, NATO VS RUSSIA, NATO VS NORTH KOREA. And they add customizable soldiers where u can put the flag and the gear that u want so u can be a korean soldier or british... it's easier and make more sense there's. No way they adding more than 10 factions
True but let's not forget that both Ukraine and Russia where different colored tape to identify each other and under half Nato country's just like Ukraine still use their old Soviet equipment and over half the Ukrainian military wears Nato or mixed uniforms now.
@khalilbarounibarouni4818 nah coz while they are aligned with NATO, south Korea and other Asian nations aren't NATO. However, I do kinda agree with you that they probably wouldn't add that many Factions. If they did, I'd split it into BLUFOR Factions and OPFOR Factions. BLUFOR consisting of USA (US Army or Marines or both), U.K., German/French Battlegroup of sorts, South Korea and Japan. OPFOR made up of Russia, China, North Korea and the Middle Eastern Coalition (Bring them back please dice)
@@khalilbarounibarouni4818 yeah that makes much more sense especially if you consider that Battlefield has never been 95 percent accurate on uniforms anyway.
One thing that often gets forgotten that bf3 and bf4 was complained a LOT at the time when they were new games.. Interesting to see what they come up with. If the core is good, but it's a little buggy at launch it's not the end of the world imo
They have way a lot to do to getting back the trust of the community, we had already seen nice arts and jingles, they need to create a path based on several ground tests open to the community.
Me as a battlefield player since the very first, I’m absolutely happy to hear the returning back to the basic bf experience, I didn’t like all bf game and skipped 2 of them. never thought about abandoning the franchise for one bad game that they made, also not for the last of them, I still play bf2042 or one of the older ones until the next one 👍🏼 maybe give delta force a try, I back in the days played the og delta force on pc , so I’m also excited to see that as well , See you on the battlefield Dennis
@@GreenBlueWalkthrough I don’t own a gaming pc right now, I think that arma is only on pc, I definitely have heard of it, it is more like a simulation I think, much more realistic
I made the grave mistake to pre-order before they even showed the cinematic trailer. I was so starved for a good FPS game, CoD cold War had just come out. And I was so thirsty for Battlefield again. Everyone has that "one" game that changed them. Some it was Fallout 76, No Man Sky, Cyberpunk etc. For me, it was Battlefield 2042
He said so much and the only thing we can take from this interview is no specialist and that the game is in modern setting. All other is nothing to believe in until we have gameplay.
The fact you’re playing battlefield 2042 shows it’s not a failure it had a player base there for it’s not failed but I agree with everything else you said
I wish they didn't ignore how cinematic battlefield 1 was. The nature of the game was both beautiful and horrifying. I understand that not everyone likes the WW1 setting, but what cannot be denied is that the style and cinematic nature of the game increases immersion and made it more enjoyable than other games with better gameplay. If you dont believe me, play bf1 with no HUD, and you'll see what I mean
Just like every other game until i see it with my own eyes they can tell us what they want Battlefield has A LOT ground to cover to gain the trust from a lot of OG BF players/vets
Oh yeah same here, was honestly expecting to be disappointed from the outset especially with how they defended the specialists. But only time will tell if this game will actually be any good
we can all agree that the next battlefield cant be worse than the 2042. I think this time we will get something at least decent at the launch but have no idea how close it will be to Bf3 and 4 in terms of experience. If this artical is even half true then it will be at least decent.
BF4 launch month flash backs... Like bro everything was fine till the game had the worst laucnh of any battlefield like worse then Cyberpunk 2077 on launchbox... Like you have no idea how good you have it.
@@GreenBlueWalkthrough I was there for the release of 4. Heck even bfbc1 and 2. It’s very important to wait, read/ watch reviews, watch streams and see how it works in the “real world”
I don't think that's AI art. I think it looks messy in the middle because it's actually a collage of different pieces of concept art that are superimposed over each other.
If the devs are looking at bf3 & bd4 for inspiration, l welcome their insight... I've played every battlefield game on pc since bf2 ... what has clearly been missing since bf4 was the bf community interaction where there was a lobby so that people or clans were able to rent use and tailor to their needs for all to enjoy.. in my opinion, that's the heart and sole of battlefield which has been on life support for such a long time.
Finally something to get excited about. Also great to hear about the community engagement and going back to it's roots of BF3/BF4 era. Thats when I cut my teeth with BF and it's been a depressing down hill ride from there. Hopefully there will be some decent play tests at a similar standard as Delta Force and we start to see more updates coming out. Also another thing I have noticed recently are lot's of emails from EA /BF in relation to my progress in BF2042. Maybe this is the start of some of their engagement with the community? Anyone else after noticing an increase in emails from them lately?
He’s saying all the right things, but I’m still wary. I’m not gonna get hyped only to get disappointed for a third time in a row. I’ve been ready to ride BF4 then BF1 until their heat death for a while now.
I clicked on your channel bc my tag on alot of games is Ender or some variation of it My personal favorite, End Her hahahahaha but ironically enough i have been revisiting 2042, im looking forward to this next installment your feedback and videos are great cheers enders (plural) (:
I hope they do a community test. I hope they do multiple. And I hope they listen to the feedback. That will go leaps and balls for me with regards to this next battlefield team winning back my trust.
@EndersFPS I would enjoy a video covering the career of Vince Zampella and your thoughts regarding the influence he may be having over the seeming turnaround in direction for the next game.
I think if there is no campaign, I will not be buying it. They got me on 2042 not happening again. I know most people only like multiplayer, but I’d like to play the campaign out and get all the challenges completed.
IF, and only IF they mind bringing new players to BF, they should implement a really good TDM mode. Like 2004 Modern Warfare 2 kind of good. 16, 24 and 32 players. The community has been missing a good TDM for decades.
2042 was "a love letter to fans" and "ahead of schedule". Sadly nothing they say means anything at this point. Mentioning BF3 and BF4 is calculated, they probably saw the tens of thousands of "BF3/BF4 remake" comments around social media. Add in a little 1942 remark to pander to the old farts, even when it has nothing to do with modern and they probably take 0 mechanics from it. At least now they are more specific than just "love letter", so if it's nothing like BF3 or BF4, Vince Zampella can be held responsible Even if it's good, I'm sure it will be littered with inapproriate camos and weapon skins, that have nothing to do with real military. That's just a modern AAA gaming industry trend that you can't shake anymore. Especially in multiplayer titles. At first they will show gritty camos, later when they have your money the woke shitshow is rolled out
Este Battlefield puede que incluya escenarios en España, pues, si aun no lo sabéis algunos, el arte conceptual es Gibraltar visto desde el peñón hasta el aeropuerto.
Overall great news, proves the GM of Battlefield KNOWS what the problems are and is hopefully going to correct them. But again I will wait to get my hands on it before any judgement, but communication like this is a step in the right direction.
TY for the thoughts on the game and I like the direction the Publ/devs are going. If BF takes off again just hope they address cheats properly. Some games like CSGO / Apex / Valorant it happens but they and community are actively going against it. Other games like COD / Warzone publ / devs apply a double standard for hi sub / popular / hi view streamers (allowing them to cheat) as they bring eyes on the game, vs other players and given COD popularity's cheating is rampant. The community is split in defending the streamers that cheat / kosher for cheating and that publ / dev stance is situation is ok, or are against it and dev publ approach is part of the problem. In Tarkov, where the devs just don't care.
I think im the only one that favours BF5. I simply love it, here in Europe the servers are full, not many hackers/cheats (Console user) think it has a unfair rep
Well my opinion is still the same: DICE has still the capacity to do a great BF even after the mediocre 2042. I'm not as pessimistic as many others have been, cause if they are not completely dumb, they just need to go back to their success formula (there is a big consensus about what this means, recently summarized in a video in this channel, for instance. If so many creators and most of the player base agrees on those conclusions, they will not try again to reinvent the wheel, I hope). I mean... It's doable and obvious. The interview just confirms than they are aware about this, so good news. But my expectations are not different than yesterday. We need to wait a bit. And of coure I will pre-order. Cause any franchise, even when in crisis, still needs a bunch of fanatics 😂
I'd be content with a BFV reskin tbh... but that was 6-7 years ago now, surely things have moved on since then, I want to see some progress (not backwards like 2042). They actually realise that if they screw up the launch it's over.
First battlefield was BF3/BF4 when I was younger, 2042 lost me and I’m glad to hear some good news finally. But like you said, and many others, we gotta wait until we get our two hands on the game but this is a good direction so far!
I think they should try a open world PvP PvE mode and expand off of portal like add deferent BF games with every update. Or a mod support like look at arma reforger has mod support for both console and PC.
Enders, beside all of those great news there are another official news that might ruin everything and here are (SOME): 1- (Tremendous Live service) so Is it like BF2024 live service: -Each season drops every 3.5 to 4.5 months? -1to 2 maps and weapon per season? -Update every 30 days which has to be weekly? -Trash maps just to fill the gap? 2- (Connected to ECO system) (No server browser) -Like BF2024 Match Making System which is broken up to date? -Providing poor servers that leads to so many issues as we all experiencing up to date. -Providing 40hz servers instead of 60hz just to save money? The list goes on and on but just to avoid making you tired reading bro.
As long as the next BF goes back to type than I will be in again. I still enjoyed V personally and I didn't play a great deal of 4 I wasn't around for it at that time of release and by the time I did it was late, but I did play 3, played Bad Company 2, played 2042, played 1, never bothered with Hardline, and thats about it with my BF history. Always loved their games though for the most part that was until 2042 got here. Can't believe it how it turned out tbh but there you go. Didn't they cease support not that long ago on it?
Hit the like button if you aren't preordering :)
I still believe that EA is gonna mess it up but I'll give them a bit of faith
this EA ceo just needs to stfu
when he talks about BF i get anxiety, when vince talks about bf i get excieted
Aye aye, captain
The constant bunny-hopping in your gameplay is irritating asf.
@@frankthecat1660sorry for playing the game at a high level
Remember: no preorders
Remember no English
I made the grave mistake to pre-order before they even showed the cinematic trailer. I was so starved for a good FPS game, CoD cold War had just come out. And I was so thirsty for Battlefield again.
Everyone has that "one" game that changed them. Some it was Fallout 76, No Man Sky, Cyberpunk etc. For me, it was Battlefield 2042
@@ΧρήστοςΧρήστος-χ2μ it's "no Russian" ya boof
No Russian
I’m pre ordering
I'm in the "I'll believe it when I see it" camp as well. The pressure all the studios are going to come under from idiotic suits at EA to make a monetization machine over a genuine player experience is going to be immense. EA can't help them selves and they have proven time and time again that it's the connection to the player's wallet that matters most to them regardless of the lip service they have given the community over the years.
They are so beyond greedy that it's blinding them into not seeing that making a good game that the community loves is what will make them more money.
That is very true, but I simply don’t think that way of treating their customers is viable anymore long term. The gaming competition is sky high, and there are loads of studios and publishers making incredible gaming experiences. If they keep failing, and keep destroying franchises because of short term greed, they will eventually suffer. Obviously they are hugely profitable right now, but I can’t see that lasting if they keep destroying franchises. Also another trainwreck game like 2042 would be absolutely terrible PR. I hope, maybe naively, that they have somewhat learned their lesson. Battlefield and its fans really deserve a game that finally lives up to the Battlefield name again.
@@theysellsoulscheaphere8501EXACTLY. This is what I genuinely don’t understand… Quality will always make way more money long term. Maybe it really wasn’t EA’s fault and it was just actually bad gaming design decisions from Dice itself that made 2042 so terrible. EA should have enough smart people to know that games like 2042 are terrible for their long term value as a company.
@@juliusjacob1416are you just not aware of the success warhammer 40k space marine 2 has had..? It sold 2 million copies within the first week. Treating your customers well and giving them a game that’s meant for them instead of pandering or trying to be like everyone else is 100% viable long term, IF the company just sacks up and does it. People speak with their wallets and time. And space marine 2 disproves what you just said .
@@GlockTuah1017that’s literally what I said… read my comment again please
Having no specialist already makes the game better than 2042.
I cannot stand specialists
no it doesn't. 90% chance this will be bad
Why do people complain about specialists?
Battlefield has always tried to make you feel immersed in its namesake, a battlefield. They did this well by making every player a nameless soldier. When they added these specialists, it totally change that feeling and made it feel like Overwatch. You’d see 6-7 clones of each character with the same voices and it was very strange and pulled you out of that feeling.
Specialists r a unique aspect to games to make them more than just point click and w key all game.
Aren’t the people who designed bf3/4 away from dice? I’m not sure that we can trust them that they know what they talking about. Just have a look on 2042.
Zampella strikes me as 1) knowing a game should be fun and 2) knowing how to get execs off his back,@@wurstfachverkaeufer
He earned my respect w Titanfall, Titanfall 2 which addressed its flaws and Apex Legends … EA’s only free and successful game.
Prove me right, Vince, please! ✌🏼😃👍🏼
A lot.of.older BF heads who had left BF in the past have been coming back since Vince took over
Yea I’ll believe it when I see it lol.
It's not like it's the first time they pull the "back to the roots" charade
Just gotta have faith
Vince knows what he's doing. In fact getting the "core" back was the thing I was hoping they would address at whatever point, so hearing him say that is good. the old devs from 3&4 are long gone though, so we can only hope that the he and the rest of the leadership are capable of directing the current staff in the proper direction.
I have no doubt in Vince’s leadership, i do however have doubt in the team of Dice… they don’t even play Battlefield themself’s… you can’t create something good in a genre you have no interest OR experience in
Not to mention but every fps games he’s worked on has amazing campaigns. MW2 and Titanfall 2 still my favorite campaigns of all fps games
I like your take. you don't seem absolutely brain dead like so many people were through the 2042 era. Subbed
Many people consider me to be battlefield's #1 hater, which basically means I'm a normal person. Welcome to the channel.
@@EndersFPS At least you're a new perspective when it's come to gaming industry.
I missed out on BF5 and 2042. Both where shit games. I need a good f*cking BF title this time around!!!!!!! I cant be playing BF3 and BF4 forever
@@EndersFPS haha I am in the right place
@@chodagreat7876 right. after 2.5k hours in BF4 it's time to move on.
I like the time stamps with this video.
They should add more features like close quarters voip ,dragging wounded soldiers, and good voice acting like screaming when getting hit or suppressed like insurgency sandstorm , it would be cool and immersive
I just don't think western triple A developers can stop themselves from creating monetization content long enough to make a game that doesn't suck on the most fundamental levels.
Have respect,@@VulgrDisplay , the games suck at every level … from fundamental to esoteric nuanced levels. ✌🏼🤣👍🏼
Hopefully they give us nameless soldiers, unlike BFV and 2042. 2042 already has good restraint on releasing goofy ass gun/gear skins, so hopefully BF2025 just gives us some decent weapon skins. Player skins will probably still happen, it is what it is. So long as I don't get rendezooked by fucking Nicki Minaj, or a basketball team mascot, I'll be fine with it.
@@Steeveersonthey said no specialists, no names
Yep this is my general concern also. Like what happened with cinema industry, where main studios are just squizing their milk cows to secure their financial return, instead of really trying to make something good, unique, original or artistic. Same seems to be happening with videogaming industry, where good titles will come only from little studios. Hopefully we will not reach that point.
I told my dogs about this, and they're very excited yet apprehensive at the same time.
I hope they go back to what made BF3 and BF1 so special, graphics wise aswell because the gritty-ness and cinematic, real like visuals of BF1 with the BF3 mechanics would just bloom with the community right now!
The art style of bf3 was so good. The crazy lens flare, the super desaturated colors, whole thing looked like an action movie.
@@lumbagoboi1649 exactly and that’s also what made me love BF1 so much, after Bf3, BF1 felt like you were in the game with the crazy cinematics and sounds and explosions.. it is by far one of my best gaming experiences along with BF3 ofc
I agree but I would say I want the Most focus on core gameplay and map design. Many games nowa day are great even without spectacular visuals. I want something that has replay ability
Bf1 had the best gameplay mechanics of any battlefield. The diving and leaning over cover, with destructible ground to hide in craters. It was so easy to snake and sleuth around the map. It was amazing
atleast they know we want the peak bf3/4 era
Lets be real, they deserve no credit or praise for confirming these features as they're the bare minimum core features BF titles should have.
It's the equivalent of a car manufacturer saying "ok so our next car is going to have wheels, a drivers seat, and an engine".
They probably saw all the BF content creators starting to cover other games (like Delta Force) since there was literally nothing to talk about with 2042 or BF in general and thought oh shit we need to "leak" something to be relevant again.
Very possible that delta force existence made them release this short info. I just hope that by some miracle these 2 factors:
1) more years of development, from what we know that wasn't reseted 3 times.
2) delta force that might steal their player base that is already small compared to what it used to.
These 2 factors should guarantee a better product than 2042 or maybe bf5. But knowing these devils they might just do a concord
@@irbisae4964 Same with ARMA refiorger blowing up and taking the gritty sim audncace.
If they make a good battlefield all Dice/EA will get from me in the base standard game and nothing else from. F*ck them and any micro transactions they’ll be shoving in our faces.
He could have just clipped this potion from his stream and uploaded it yet he takes his time and makes a whole separate video. Dedication and professionalism as usual. 💯
B3/4 with BF1 atmosphere would be peak.
The lead map designer for the next BF is boasting about how great the maps are going to be (the same guy who did the 2042 maps) and then the lead UI designer on Twitter is being all proud of himself that there will be a Scoreboard on launch. Things that I deem the absolute bare minimum standard are apparently big news now.
The fact that they go back to classes is highly reassuring. That leaves some glimpse of hope for the game to be decent.
You’re 100% on point here. Not so much on the stream on everything, but you’re a great point of info for BF. I PRAY, Vince pushes them into a win. BF needs a win.
An early upload?? We’re getting spoiled. I really appreciate how vocal Vince is being and isn’t afraid to state things like BF3/4 was prime Battlefield.
Vince is maintaining my respect
Battlefield 1 was on par with 3 and 4. Most fans think this.
@@manaus1775 Lol no they don't
@@manaus1775no it wasn't. BF1 is a good game but BF3/4 are better
@@boloaimlock603 Not really but okay... papa rola
6:11 "I'm not really sure on his perspective on that"
His perspective: I don't want to get fired.
The new title MUST HAVE CLAN TAGS (Platoons etc)
Honestly I want clans back in BF, some of my fondest memories are with those communities. Not in closed discord spaces, but a way to connect players solely in BF. I even played in a few clan matches back in BF3/BF4. Freaking neat.. I just don't see that happening unless they go back to their roots.\
The Main Protagonist might be from the former Yugoslav Republic. The coastal area looks like Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, or Albania idk. I think EA is slowly hyping the game.
I just hope that the fact he pointed to bf3/bf4 as the peak was not beacuse of the setting but because of the gameplay.
They need to be 100% honest with the community. It's the last chance that I believe every BF player will give them, just for the sake of the old days. All the creativity in BF1 and BF4, including Battlelog and network services, focusing on the quality of the experience, is the most important thing that all of us are going to focus on while we watch RUclipsrs' gameplay or try it ourselves. We are not going to look at cinematics or be happy about the promises or even pre-order like BF2042 did to us. "They have to choose either to regain BF players' trust or to scam them again to lose them forever."
For what it's worth, I'd say 'trust but verify'. Cheer on the Devs for positive signals but remain clear this'll be judged on substance, so make sure any Alphas / Betas are good quality. If they're bad, it'll trigger a run on the brand it might not survive. We can't do a 2042 launch again -- get it right, even if you need to delay.
can you imagine if they start promoting the game like bf3? all those trailers and stuff. bf3 was the first ever game i played on console. i fell in love with the game and i grinded every day to get better. I really hope they make something similar to that one.
Vince is the goat .. he created medal of honor , call of duty and now involved in the development of battlefield .. this is great man .. i have high hopes
Having him on the team doesnt automaticly promises a successful game,DICE sucks a fat one
@@DJPUPPETMASTER-RESURRECTED-you’re 100% right.
one thing i really want is they took a step back graphically from bf1, look at bf2042 and bf1, i know which one looks so much better and its 5 years older. just listen to the community and they'll have a great battlefield
They didn’t make the graphics worse because they thought that’s what was best. The old talent is simply missing from the current studio so they are unable to recreate that magic
@@SchoologyGames I’m not saying they made it purposefully worse but it definitely is. But yeah most decent developers have left the company
I hope fortifications come back along with squad call in orders
Honestly, more team play please. Looks at battlefield 2 for that, bring the fortifications from bf5 and have the gunplay and atmosphere from bf3
Been playing since 1942 and this new direction gives me hope the franchise will be back in good standing. At the very least it sounds like they are finally listening to what we've been begging for over a decade.
"Nice, dense, really nice"
yeah really not sure what he was saying there lol
This is why I’m an advocate for squats.
Has anyone mentioned the possibility of getting Battlelog like in BF4? I think Battlelog was insane
BF1 Soundtrack was peak too... you can tell they put so much effort into that game... the animations and sound... BF4 and BF3 was peak gameplay tho
His words can be (and I believe they are) honest and sincere. However, the major question here is:
Does he have the true power to steer Battlefield in that direction?
I do believe that even in BF2042 some people had the motive to turn that game in the greatest with core community desires, but some upper “management” come and tear the draft for money that they actually lose for not following what made battlefield great.
Side note here: I truly believe that every mistake battlefield made (no matter how bad they were) actually give the opportunity to make the next game the GOAT. They gotta try new things…
The question is:
Are they listening?
I've been gone for a minute, not when I hear BF news, I gotta come back to my boy enders. Thank you again for being a real one! I'm excited to see what happens. Especially the way this man was answering these questions.
3:13 notice how he said "do that *amazingly* well"
This could very much be a reach, but to me that sounds that they know the next game needs to be *great* , not just good enough. Sounds like they know we'll all go to Delta Force if the next game isn't BF3 / BF4 level
Could just be the usual EA corporate yap tho
The perfect setting for bf6. WW3 with the following factions for game release. Asia- CN,NK vs SK,JAP, PIL, US. Europe- UKR, Nato vs RU, CSTO. Middle East- US, ISR vs IRA, YEM, LEB. What do you guys think? What factions and, locations would you want to see later or at games release?
Ukraine as a Factions seems kind meh tbh. Too mish- mashed equipment wise, but that's just me. No standardisation with uniforms or vehicles
Or maybe just NATO in every continent NATO VS FICTIONAL ARAB FACTION, NATO VS RUSSIA, NATO VS NORTH KOREA. And they add customizable soldiers where u can put the flag and the gear that u want so u can be a korean soldier or british... it's easier and make more sense there's. No way they adding more than 10 factions
True but let's not forget that both Ukraine and Russia where different colored tape to identify each other and under half Nato country's just like Ukraine still use their old Soviet equipment and over half the Ukrainian military wears Nato or mixed uniforms now.
@khalilbarounibarouni4818 nah coz while they are aligned with NATO, south Korea and other Asian nations aren't NATO. However, I do kinda agree with you that they probably wouldn't add that many Factions. If they did, I'd split it into BLUFOR Factions and OPFOR Factions. BLUFOR consisting of USA (US Army or Marines or both), U.K., German/French Battlegroup of sorts, South Korea and Japan. OPFOR made up of Russia, China, North Korea and the Middle Eastern Coalition (Bring them back please dice)
@@khalilbarounibarouni4818 yeah that makes much more sense especially if you consider that Battlefield has never been 95 percent accurate on uniforms anyway.
One thing that often gets forgotten that bf3 and bf4 was complained a LOT at the time when they were new games.. Interesting to see what they come up with. If the core is good, but it's a little buggy at launch it's not the end of the world imo
BF4 was one of worse launchs in history litterly did not work for a month... BFV BF 2042 on the hand had minor cosmatic bugs.
Case and point - good signs, but it means nothing until It’s in our hands in 2026 and we can confirm they actually executed on what they’re saying.
They have way a lot to do to getting back the trust of the community, we had already seen nice arts and jingles, they need to create a path based on several ground tests open to the community.
Me as a battlefield player since the very first, I’m absolutely happy to hear the returning back to the basic bf experience,
I didn’t like all bf game and skipped 2 of them. never thought about abandoning the franchise for one bad game that they made, also not for the last of them, I still play bf2042 or one of the older ones until the next one 👍🏼 maybe give delta force a try, I back in the days played the og delta force on pc , so I’m also excited to see that as well ,
See you on the battlefield
Dennis
You would love Arama reforger littly what if BF2 came out in current year.
@@GreenBlueWalkthrough I don’t own a gaming pc right now, I think that arma is only on pc, I definitely have heard of it, it is more like a simulation I think, much more realistic
I made the grave mistake to pre-order before they even showed the cinematic trailer. I was so starved for a good FPS game, CoD cold War had just come out. And I was so thirsty for Battlefield again.
Everyone has that "one" game that changed them. Some it was Fallout 76, No Man Sky, Cyberpunk etc. For me, it was Battlefield 2042
For me, it was Cyberpunk
He said so much and the only thing we can take from this interview is no specialist and that the game is in modern setting. All other is nothing to believe in until we have gameplay.
The fact you’re playing battlefield 2042 shows it’s not a failure it had a player base there for it’s not failed but I agree with everything else you said
Remember: 0 expectations
I wish they didn't ignore how cinematic battlefield 1 was. The nature of the game was both beautiful and horrifying. I understand that not everyone likes the WW1 setting, but what cannot be denied is that the style and cinematic nature of the game increases immersion and made it more enjoyable than other games with better gameplay. If you dont believe me, play bf1 with no HUD, and you'll see what I mean
That has been in every BF game... It's a key feature of the series.
The city in the concept art is Gibraltar.
As I said in chat, I like what I'm hearing and seeing. Regardless, remember, NO pre ordering.
Terrific video! Thank you so much!!
bro gib key i watch 1 hour no redeem code where?
bro pls where key
!drops
Bro gib pls where key
!redeem
Ign says 2042 found its footing... Yea, in the barginbin. I'll believe it when i see it.
DICE need to hire Enders to be their advisor
Just like every other game until i see it with my own eyes they can tell us what they want
Battlefield has A LOT ground to cover to gain the trust from a lot of OG BF players/vets
Very surprised they didn't double down on specialists. Overall like you said, Ill believe it when I see it
Oh yeah same here, was honestly expecting to be disappointed from the outset especially with how they defended the specialists. But only time will tell if this game will actually be any good
Didn’t they keep saying they would keep specialists? I swear that happened. 😳🤪
I’m glad they canned them!
we can all agree that the next battlefield cant be worse than the 2042. I think this time we will get something at least decent at the launch but have no idea how close it will be to Bf3 and 4 in terms of experience. If this artical is even half true then it will be at least decent.
When a battlefield launches the same year as GTA, it's a good game, here's hoping
It’s a good start but people need to wait for actual gameplay, alpha gameplay, open beta, etc
BF4 launch month flash backs... Like bro everything was fine till the game had the worst laucnh of any battlefield like worse then Cyberpunk 2077 on launchbox... Like you have no idea how good you have it.
@@GreenBlueWalkthrough I was there for the release of 4. Heck even bfbc1 and 2. It’s very important to wait, read/ watch reviews, watch streams and see how it works in the “real world”
It sounds all perfect but I gotta wait and see.
I don't think that's AI art. I think it looks messy in the middle because it's actually a collage of different pieces of concept art that are superimposed over each other.
If the devs are looking at bf3 & bd4 for inspiration, l welcome their insight...
I've played every battlefield game on pc since bf2 ... what has clearly been missing since bf4 was the bf community interaction where there was a lobby so that people or clans were able to rent use and tailor to their needs for all to enjoy..
in my opinion, that's the heart and sole of battlefield which has been on life support for such a long time.
Hold steady - no preorders
Don't cry if it's good and you miss out.
Finally something to get excited about. Also great to hear about the community engagement and going back to it's roots of BF3/BF4 era. Thats when I cut my teeth with BF and it's been a depressing down hill ride from there. Hopefully there will be some decent play tests at a similar standard as Delta Force and we start to see more updates coming out.
Also another thing I have noticed recently are lot's of emails from EA /BF in relation to my progress in BF2042. Maybe this is the start of some of their engagement with the community? Anyone else after noticing an increase in emails from them lately?
The news sounds great, glad to hear SOMETHING. But like you said, I’ll believe it when I see it
He’s saying all the right things, but I’m still wary. I’m not gonna get hyped only to get disappointed for a third time in a row. I’ve been ready to ride BF4 then BF1 until their heat death for a while now.
Ohh late night Enders. What a special treat!
I clicked on your channel bc my tag on alot of games is Ender or some variation of it
My personal favorite, End Her hahahahaha
but ironically enough i have been revisiting 2042,
im looking forward to this next installment
your feedback and videos are great
cheers enders (plural) (:
I really hope they pull through on this next title. I really preferred battlefield over COD, but 2042 changed my mind.
Get on the Mod support train and see how old school we're gettin?.. not that far
would be really cool
I hope they do a community test. I hope they do multiple. And I hope they listen to the feedback. That will go leaps and balls for me with regards to this next battlefield team winning back my trust.
@EndersFPS I would enjoy a video covering the career of Vince Zampella and your thoughts regarding the influence he may be having over the seeming turnaround in direction for the next game.
Dice casually releasing massive details about the next game on a random Monday with no warning lmao
I don’t want an extraction after hazard zone. But a revamped firestorm would be sick
A Community Test Environment would be huge
I think if there is no campaign, I will not be buying it. They got me on 2042 not happening again. I know most people only like multiplayer, but I’d like to play the campaign out and get all the challenges completed.
I know this isn't important but I really hope they bring back normal one-hit melee like Battlefield 4. The whole double melee is not as satisfying
IF, and only IF they mind bringing new players to BF, they should implement a really good TDM mode. Like 2004 Modern Warfare 2 kind of good. 16, 24 and 32 players. The community has been missing a good TDM for decades.
The nostalgia hits hard, I pray they can deliver.
Battlefield Bad Company 2 was within the best era aswell as 3, 4 & 1942, if not more so!
My fav in the entire series
2042 was "a love letter to fans" and "ahead of schedule". Sadly nothing they say means anything at this point. Mentioning BF3 and BF4 is calculated, they probably saw the tens of thousands of "BF3/BF4 remake" comments around social media. Add in a little 1942 remark to pander to the old farts, even when it has nothing to do with modern and they probably take 0 mechanics from it. At least now they are more specific than just "love letter", so if it's nothing like BF3 or BF4, Vince Zampella can be held responsible
Even if it's good, I'm sure it will be littered with inapproriate camos and weapon skins, that have nothing to do with real military. That's just a modern AAA gaming industry trend that you can't shake anymore. Especially in multiplayer titles. At first they will show gritty camos, later when they have your money the woke shitshow is rolled out
IN VINCE, WE TRUST
I'll believe when I see it. 😂
Hard to believe those words if this guy is involved with BFV and 2024 lol
Este Battlefield puede que incluya escenarios en España, pues, si aun no lo sabéis algunos, el arte conceptual es Gibraltar visto desde el peñón hasta el aeropuerto.
Overall great news, proves the GM of Battlefield KNOWS what the problems are and is hopefully going to correct them. But again I will wait to get my hands on it before any judgement, but communication like this is a step in the right direction.
I agree a lot with it needs to be good out of the gate. I feel like every battlefield is released too early. First impression is everything for sure
TY for the thoughts on the game and I like the direction the Publ/devs are going. If BF takes off again just hope they address cheats properly. Some games like CSGO / Apex / Valorant it happens but they and community are actively going against it. Other games like COD / Warzone publ / devs apply a double standard for hi sub / popular / hi view streamers (allowing them to cheat) as they bring eyes on the game, vs other players and given COD popularity's cheating is rampant. The community is split in defending the streamers that cheat / kosher for cheating and that publ / dev stance is situation is ok, or are against it and dev publ approach is part of the problem. In Tarkov, where the devs just don't care.
I think im the only one that favours BF5. I simply love it, here in Europe the servers are full, not many hackers/cheats (Console user) think it has a unfair rep
Well my opinion is still the same: DICE has still the capacity to do a great BF even after the mediocre 2042. I'm not as pessimistic as many others have been, cause if they are not completely dumb, they just need to go back to their success formula (there is a big consensus about what this means, recently summarized in a video in this channel, for instance. If so many creators and most of the player base agrees on those conclusions, they will not try again to reinvent the wheel, I hope). I mean... It's doable and obvious. The interview just confirms than they are aware about this, so good news. But my expectations are not different than yesterday. We need to wait a bit.
And of coure I will pre-order. Cause any franchise, even when in crisis, still needs a bunch of fanatics 😂
I'd be content with a BFV reskin tbh... but that was 6-7 years ago now, surely things have moved on since then, I want to see some progress (not backwards like 2042). They actually realise that if they screw up the launch it's over.
First battlefield was BF3/BF4 when I was younger, 2042 lost me and I’m glad to hear some good news finally. But like you said, and many others, we gotta wait until we get our two hands on the game but this is a good direction so far!
I think they should try a open world PvP PvE mode and expand off of portal like add deferent BF games with every update. Or a mod support like look at arma reforger has mod support for both console and PC.
Always have hope. Battlefield is built on hope.
I"m cautiously optimistic. I want this game to do good. i want to have fun. Best of luck to dice.
Don't pre-order and don't get excited until we see actual gameplay montages, not pre-rendered trailers
They should add the customization of soliders to the game like how the game world war 3 did for the pc two years ago
Hope they make a campaign
Enders, beside all of those great news there are another official news that might ruin everything and here are (SOME):
1- (Tremendous Live service) so Is it like BF2024 live service:
-Each season drops every 3.5 to 4.5 months?
-1to 2 maps and weapon per season?
-Update every 30 days which has to be weekly?
-Trash maps just to fill the gap?
2- (Connected to ECO system) (No server browser)
-Like BF2024 Match Making System which is broken up to date?
-Providing poor servers that leads to so many issues as we all experiencing up to date.
-Providing 40hz servers instead of 60hz just to save money?
The list goes on and on but just to avoid making you tired reading bro.
Gamplay of 3 & 4 and the atmosphere of 1 and 5 with = PROFIT
5's atmosphere sucks though
As long as the next BF goes back to type than I will be in again. I still enjoyed V personally and I didn't play a great deal of 4 I wasn't around for it at that time of release and by the time I did it was late, but I did play 3, played Bad Company 2, played 2042, played 1, never bothered with Hardline, and thats about it with my BF history. Always loved their games though for the most part that was until 2042 got here. Can't believe it how it turned out tbh but there you go. Didn't they cease support not that long ago on it?