I'm sitting on the balcony, with a view of New Belgrade, it's summer night, it's warm in Serbia these days. And I would say that this is one of the better confrontations of opinion on any world media. Both sides of the story are heard. At the same time, the journalist knows his job, does not interrupt the interlocutors while they are talking, and yet leads the conversation in the direction of which he imagined. Very professional, hats off to you.Greatings from Belgrade ,Serbia.❤
You can question if you trust a tool when applied to a situation. For example, do you trust science in the application of politics? There you get political science and political science philosophy trying to answer that question.
Well it’s a somewhat of a hard question depending on how technical you want to go. You ahead and define it for me and I can show you why it’s difficult
Neil can obviously tell you what a female is What your talking about is Neil not taking the same position of you on wether we can allow people who are not female to call themselves women That's not a question of science or fact but of society and ethics.
Do your history...and learn some science... there has been third genders for 1000s of years. Sometimes it's better to say nothing , rather than show how ignorant you might be
@@jack37133 Yeah, the irony to question science when most things you use is science. Counting, language, time, food, water, transport, medical, money, calenders. Etc. If you dont trust science, you should just not exist at all. Since you use it constantly youre in a biased world if you think otherwise.
Asking a question is not the same as having a position on the topic. Learn the difference. Piers was setting him up to spike the ball. Nothing more than that.
@@kəanıncupıdo the mistake is you thinking it makes a difference. Putin caused an oil crisis that affected every single individual on the planet. Has anyone done anything about Putin? Have you? Putin remains untouched. So who cares if it was or wasnt a mistake? Nobody gonna change anything.
Eric Weinstein is communicating on a higher level than the typical social media "gotcha" frequency. Bravo for him. He has my respect. He recognizes that we are human beings and we can have dissent without needing to disrespect each other.
so i wonder why anyone for which science is a faith based religion (since a lot of comments seem to be spewed by first-day maths amateurs) suddenly starts cheering for Terrence. Quite ironic
because they are all pushing the same narrative, it is obious Fauchi is the biggest lier but they won't talk about that, they aren't getting paid for that
That’s the problem (taking a class) it’s like saying the opposite. Imagine if Terrance was teaching the class. The class doesn’t matter if your being told untrue things
The comments are very interesting, they tell you everything you need to know about the mentality you get from following a conservative narrative: delusion and bigotry. Very instructive indeed.
Peer-reviewed science as we know it began in the seventeenth century, with the establishment of scientific journals. The first journal to implement a peer-review process was the *Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society*, which started in 1665. The Royal Society of London, which published the journal, played a crucial role in formalizing the process of having other experts in the field review scientific work before publication to ensure accuracy and validity. This practice became more widespread over the following centuries, forming the basis of the modern scientific publication system.
What I love about these guests, unlike practically every other debate on Piers's shows, is they will actually sit and listen and wait their turn to respond instead of interrupting and shouting over one another. Very refreshing to watch and listen to
I find that people don't take the experience of being lied to and not trust others, rather they find someone else to trust They start trusting their Facebook group or anyone who calls themselves an expert and affirms what they want to believe
Solid! No screaming, no interrupting, and zero outrageous clip baiting comments. Cheers lads you just paved the way for polite civil conversation. The only way to reach people.
In terms of Eric Weinstein Brain Keating is one of the greatest cosmologists in the world (he is building the largest telescope on earth), he is one of his best friends, he is also best friends with Lee Smolin co founder of quantum loop theory and he is also freinds with Edward Frankle one of the greatest mathematicans in the world. and they all say he is one of the smartest people they know he is no hack.
It’s ironic that the smartest person on the panel (Eric) is the only one who respects the capacity of the general public to weigh up ideas intelligently
Eric did a great job on Rogan. He handled the situation with class. Any “scientist” that criticizes him for that is filled with hubris and sanctimony. Snobbery doesn’t gain any points. I appreciate Eric W.
@@Illhostility99.99% of our population can’t disprove what he is saying including the producers of this show. This was just gross manipulation of what people should think.
This is why I'm such a huge fan of Eric. We live in a strange world where scientists, who have a public presence, have a reputation for being incurious and condescending. Eric is well-mannered, but he has balls. Academia is riddled with cowards
@@SeventhWing It's not "gatekeeping." It's that the scientific community will ensure and protect the integrity and principles of the scientific method.
You guys are treating Terrence Howard like Einstein when Einstein came out people told the public that his theories were false they wasn't true and now his theories are used commonly now so I'm kind of confused with you guys over here talking bad about this man because he decided to show a different side of the science table
@@cperez1000 now this is really weird, I'm not even a fan of terrence but it's clear that this guy doesn't let him talk which i do understand why.. while watching that podcast i wanna hear more of terrence reasoning, but most of the time its deflected to something else basically its going nowhere, and it was stated early on eric wants to be in control
@@nnnnnbcsyihgfchj Eric was talking to a guy who was telling the world that their whole lives are based off of a false reality and their life's work meant pretty much nothing, on the world biggest platform. I think Eric handled it like a true gentlemen.
Mock all you want. I worked in a university for a decade and Eric Weinstein and Terrance Howard are more in line with the spirit of collaborative research that advances science far more than the extremely brittle perspectives of some of the others. When you start to believe that the only people who can give insight on a problem are people who are trained “exactly like you” your progress will stagnate
Exactly. Every scientists is trained the same way by people that control their field. Outsiders are condemned or disregarded as not being worthy of audience. Thinking outside the box is how some of the world's best technologies have been invented. Besides all that, it seems as if there is a cancelation campaign being waged against Terrance Howard. He's been ridiculed on almost every media platform for some reason or the other for the past year or so. Ever since he said that African Americans shouldn't have to pay taxes, he's been targeted. Could be a coincidence, but maybe not
Fa sho, fa sho! Folks have lost the thread of what collaboration looks like, nor have any idea what constructive criticism looks like or what it’s value might be.
Eric said exactly that in the interview though. In The Joe Rogan episode he says word for word. The scientific method does not prove something as true, agreement of peers does. Had he been alive when Galileo was around, he would have been calling Galileo a moron
Eric is the type of person I would get along great with. His way of confronting issues without totally dismissing the entire thing and breaking every single topic out with critical thinking, while acknowledging the good shows the type of person he is in the scientific community. Need more like him.
Agree, he’s the type of tutor you would want as a young Physics student. Knows enough that you know you’re beneath him, but humble enough so that he doesn’t destroy your confidence to learn.
Terrance is not there , although smart. He knows buzzwords that the average person, ie you, doesn't, so he sounds like he has something. He does not understand math and physics at all.
Please don't. He is one of the most caustic and angry podcasters on RUclips. If ever there was a true believer and disciple of science as an infallible arbiter of knowledge, it's "professor" Dave. I've never seen anyone treat science as a religion more than "professor" Dave.
So a woman plagerised the work of another woman named Harvard. Grammar and the use of proper sentences is important in science. It all began in 1875. A then young Newton met a poet named Alfred Mitchell Spencer. Anyway, ask Weinstein to explain the rest. I'm bored.
I'm really uncomfortable with the phrase 'Terence Howard's science'. Although formal education in science isn't required, if you want to talk to Eric Weinstein with any success, it would be an enormous help to have a couple of them. Terence Howard does not. I applaud Eric Weinstein for being so patient and gracious.
Eric Weinstein's stance was the right way to approach the conversation. Pseudo-scientists sadly won't go away, and I respect Eric's attempt to clarify the issue with the hope that it will be well received. Reason vs online bullying.
Eric has some deep hatred toward Neil. NDT was a lot more kind to TH than he should have been. Howard is delusional and Eric is placating that delusion to leech some followers. Eric these days is more grifter than scientist. Dunning Kruger fits Howard perfectly. Please watch Professor Dave’s review of this.
I am an MD PhD. It is widely known that over the past 50 years, science has been subject to biases. Those now have become worse with politicization. I trust science that I evaluate but not Mainstream politicians, people like Neil or Eric, or media.
@@ryanjamesc9996 He's trustworthy in the sense that he believes in real science. But he's not totally committed to it. He's also a businessman who works for venture firms. Thus, he likely has biases and things he would rather not discuss. That's why we should listen to people with a little bit of skepticism.
I don't understand the controversy over this. Terrance Howard presented some wild ideas and was more than willing to have them challenged by an expert like Wienstein. Now we can make up our own minds. That's how it's supposed to be! That's healthy and necessary!
I love how respectful this dialogue is, the panel didn’t speak until Piers let them know it was their turn. I can applaud the intelligence, patience, and class
Lol, the panel didn't speak because their microphones were turned off. Meanwhile they had to listen to Weinstein spew his pseudo-intellectual garbage and. This whole interview was embarrassing to listen to. Giving any amount of airtime to clowns like Weinstein and Howard is an affront to common sense.
@@PhotosByDre-b5vAre the funding issues taught in school? Their hands are tied, as far as doing science. They have to please the funders. Journals have to please the advertisers.
Eric Weinstein is now officially a superstar to me right now. His understanding of societies reluctance to trust the establishment is absolutely refreshing. We desperately need like minded individuals to be vocal and lead the fight to keep humanity safe from itself.
@@helencheung2537no because it’s not a debate he brought on three people agreeing on the same subject. This is not a debate, its a form on trying to cancel anyone with a different theory to anything ‘science related’ 🙄🙄🙄
It’s not about being right. It’s about being honest about what you do or don’t know and allowing dissent. Authorities denied discourse so we don’t trust them that simple
Eric was being gracious to Howard BECAUSE he's a scientist. Einstein once said to a group of scientists: "You all dismiss my theory yet none of you have been able to disprove it". Science is always uncertain and a continuous process of elimination.
@@GooseHen25 Agreed, but to him being a scientist means being open to every possiblity and that is what he dislikes in the current science. It's a corrupt power hierarchy.
That was quite possibly the most thoughtful and reasoned comment I have ever seen here, thank you. I have come to realize that Piers likes having guests who fight. We - human beings in general - do not need more of that. Maybe having everyone in the same room for these discussions would help?
Do you trust science?
What else is there to trust? God?
Not universally and def media
“Trust the science.” -2020
Not as much as I used to.
NOT ON MY LIFE.
Why aren’t they attacking Neil for saying gender is a spectrum like they attack Terrence Howard 🤔
Because scientists who focus on biology agree. Dummy.
Must be exhausting being a Rightwinger and constantly thinking about where a transexual takes a 💩
Today I wore pants tomorrow I’m wearing a skirt
Neil calling gender a spectrum probably has something to do with how he uses the word gender.
Same ❤@@scrillion6
I do trust science and it should be questioned and proven over and over again. Censorship is not the answer at all!
Fock yea
Moster def
This is how it works!
Questioning things repeatedly forever can just amount to a waste of time and attention with nothing gained.
@@vege4920 the 3rd most important part of science is REPEATABLE what are you on about?
there's nothing to trust.
I'm sitting on the balcony, with a view of New Belgrade, it's summer night, it's warm in Serbia these days. And I would say that this is one of the better confrontations of opinion on any world media. Both sides of the story are heard. At the same time, the journalist knows his job, does not interrupt the interlocutors while they are talking, and yet leads the conversation in the direction of which he imagined. Very professional, hats off to you.Greatings from Belgrade ,Serbia.❤
❤
Science is a tool. It’s like asking ‘do you trust hammers’
The people in this video are also tools.
Good metaphor. And asking if you trust a tool makes sense. Meaning, is the took reliable?
You can question if you trust a tool when applied to a situation. For example, do you trust science in the application of politics? There you get political science and political science philosophy trying to answer that question.
Exactly, and where there's quality control for the production of something like a hammer, there's peer reviewing for scientific research
I'd definitely trust a spanner 🔧
People lost faith in "science" when they figured out it can be purchased...
Exactly!
às evidenced during crowvid shennanigans.
@@hara3435 ..and climate change puesdo science
As an electrical engineer with master in biomedical engineering, I completely agree. 👍
Thats a good tattoo
neil cant even tell you what a woman is
Jesus Christ
@@MADDcartmanNo he was a man.
Well it’s a somewhat of a hard question depending on how technical you want to go. You ahead and define it for me and I can show you why it’s difficult
Go marry one and find out
Neil can obviously tell you what a female is
What your talking about is Neil not taking the same position of you on wether we can allow people who are not female to call themselves women
That's not a question of science or fact but of society and ethics.
"You can't stop me,
I'm my own worst enemy and my own bestfriend."
-Terrence
Eric: That was a beautiful statement.
😂😂😂
To Neil’s defense he didn’t release the peer review for years until he was name checked on JRE🤣
Release it? Terrance had it all that time
And destroyed it
Here we are watching Neil et al on the 'Piers Reveiw'
I like Neil, He says he doesn't know when he doesn't, and he explains why he doesn't know,
Neil… the guy who says gender IS on a spectrum 😂
He didn't mean it, he was very high on the jab at that time.
Do your history...and learn some science... there has been third genders for 1000s of years. Sometimes it's better to say nothing , rather than show how ignorant you might be
dude has lost all pf his credibility
Neil is correct. That is the scientific position.
Zero respect for that!!!
The irony of piers questioning him about platforming liars and charlatans is rich.
💯 😭
To challenge their viewpoints? He isn't necessarily an agreeable guy, most of the time there's heated arguments.
@@jack37133 Yeah, the irony to question science when most things you use is science. Counting, language, time, food, water, transport, medical, money, calenders. Etc.
If you dont trust science, you should just not exist at all. Since you use it constantly youre in a biased world if you think otherwise.
Asking a question is not the same as having a position on the topic. Learn the difference. Piers was setting him up to spike the ball. Nothing more than that.
Meanwhile Piers platforms pedoph*les and cannibals (Kevin Spacey and Armie)
“Secret service level of never making a mistake” isn’t aging well lol
Maybe that mistake wasn't a mistake. 😳😏
@@kəanıncupıdo maybe, but unfortunately I don’t think we’ll ever get enough information to know
@@kəanıncupıdo the mistake is you thinking it makes a difference. Putin caused an oil crisis that affected every single individual on the planet. Has anyone done anything about Putin? Have you? Putin remains untouched. So who cares if it was or wasnt a mistake? Nobody gonna change anything.
@andrewkarsten5268 The fact that we won't is enough information in and of itself.
Eric Weinstein is communicating on a higher level than the typical social media "gotcha" frequency. Bravo for him. He has my respect. He recognizes that we are human beings and we can have dissent without needing to disrespect each other.
He is no great thinker.
Science isn’t supposed to be a faith based religion.
so i wonder why anyone for which science is a faith based religion (since a lot of comments seem to be spewed by first-day maths amateurs) suddenly starts cheering for Terrence. Quite ironic
Brian Keating is adept at building strawmen. I used to like the guy, but anyone resorting to appeals to authority is my enemy.
They use to be one in the same
It never has been. Only in the mind of right wingers is that the case bcuz none of it aligns with their crazy.
these people are not scientists they're propagandists. Their number 1 mission is to destroy the 1st amendment. if that happens god help us.
Challenging science IS science, and it didnt start with COVID, Piers.
You are right, however the challenging of science completely stopped during covid!
@@TheGardenerNorthit stopped with peer review
@@crushinnihilismpeer review is a fundamental aspect of all modern science. You are not a bright boy.
@TheGardenerNorth how did challenging science stop during COVID?
@@Cushpot Because it turned into a dogma... An extremely harmful dogma, which costed millions of young lives lost and trillions of dollars.
One of the only episodes where there is no talking over each other. Respect for these guys.
because they are all pushing the same narrative, it is obious Fauchi is the biggest lier but they won't talk about that, they aren't getting paid for that
We do peer reviews in college every week. There are no lords in my classroom..
Piers looking rather uncomfortable when the matter of Covid and follow the science came up 😂😂😂😂😂
😂😂😂😂😂
Timestamp?
Because he did vaccinate his kids....and he was so proud of that....Andrew Tate laughed in his face for that
I saw it too! 😂😂
lol at title “unhinged Eric Wienstein”.. the good doctor was as cool as a cucumber as he refuted his colleague and friend
Terrence just needs to take a class for about 4 years
That’s the problem (taking a class) it’s like saying the opposite. Imagine if Terrance was teaching the class. The class doesn’t matter if your being told untrue things
The first scientists didn't have a 4years class.They just exposed their ideas.
@@fadisiss3557They also understood the basics of what they were talking about.
@@maynardtrendle820 Terrence understands more than the basics
@@maynardtrendle820 from direct experience and not a bible of faith.... science needs to stop acting like Vatican 2.0
Never seen him so quiet he had no clue what was going on lol
When weed wants to get high it smokes Terrace Howard
Dummy high
😂
Scary Movie 2 Remake 2024 with Tarrance😂😂😂
Banger!
😂
South Park is already working on this parody😭
😂
They are the best
You can bet on that!
They´ve had 20 years time. So it should be goooood.
I thought this WAS the parody❗
The comments are very interesting, they tell you everything you need to know about the mentality you get from following a conservative narrative: delusion and bigotry. Very instructive indeed.
How's your bias doing?
@@ec954 strictly what I need from it, and not a bit more than that.
Please keep partisanship out of this lol
Exactly what you say about conservatives is exactly how you are. Hilarious.
Peer-reviewed science as we know it began in the seventeenth century, with the establishment of scientific journals. The first journal to implement a peer-review process was the *Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society*, which started in 1665. The Royal Society of London, which published the journal, played a crucial role in formalizing the process of having other experts in the field review scientific work before publication to ensure accuracy and validity. This practice became more widespread over the following centuries, forming the basis of the modern scientific publication system.
What I love about these guests, unlike practically every other debate on Piers's shows, is they will actually sit and listen and wait their turn to respond instead of interrupting and shouting over one another. Very refreshing to watch and listen to
That is why this has been my favorite episode of the dozen or so I've seen.
I totally agree! It’s a nice change to hear them respect each other, even when they disagree!
@@SophieSionBydeMorgan's show has been designed around the crosstalk format, people can jump in anytime
Amateurs 🙂
It's because 2 out of 3 guests are university professors, not lawyers, social media influencers, nor quasi celebrities.
Stop mocking a guy who claims that 1x1=2, lots of you guys were tricked into believing that men can get pregnant.
😂😂😂
Word yo! Dem’some FAX!
True! 😂🎉
It's not an either/proposition.
😂
I wish Brian Keating had joined the panel sooner. Eric is painfully boring and unnecessarily verbose.
"Secret service level" aged well
People know that they have been lied to repeatedly, so they don't trust anyone or anything anymore.
Thats not true at all. I trust cats
Either that was a joke or you're one of the weird people detached from reality.@@tannerh151
@@tannerh151 cats are sincere they dont play games and hide their intentions and if they dont like you, youll know at the minute . a lot superior lool
I find that people don't take the experience of being lied to and not trust others, rather they find someone else to trust
They start trusting their Facebook group or anyone who calls themselves an expert and affirms what they want to believe
The proof math and physics work is the phone in your hand where you watched this video on a qhd screen the size of a creditcard over the internet.
Solid! No screaming, no interrupting, and zero outrageous clip baiting comments. Cheers lads you just paved the way for polite civil conversation. The only way to reach people.
Agreed!
Because Piers didn't have clue!!
The one thing i learned from all of this is THEY dont want to be questioned.
😂 it’s not one apple times one apple, it’s one apple times the number 1.
Having a doctorate doesnt mean you cant be a hack
Walk around Cambridge, MA and you will see how accurate your comment is! Same is likely true for the 'other' Cambridge
They just want to remain the gatekeepers of science
90%+ of professors identify to be on the left. They've turned academia hyper partisan and expect respect in return. Nah.
Read Eric's math theories. He is actually really dumb. It is shocking.
In terms of Eric Weinstein Brain Keating is one of the greatest cosmologists in the world (he is building the largest telescope on earth), he is one of his best friends, he is also best friends with Lee Smolin co founder of quantum loop theory and he is also freinds with Edward Frankle one of the greatest mathematicans in the world. and they all say he is one of the smartest people they know he is no hack.
The moment I see Neil deGrasse Tyson's face, I turn a deaf ear to him. I literally have zero interest in anything he has to say.
I need reasons.
@@MMAGamblingTipshe doesn't know what a woman is
weird way to say "I can't understand science so I just ignore it" 😆
@@MMAGamblingTips There are a lot of stories about him trying to pick up freshman he was teaching when he was a professor.
@@marshie20193 Seems like a wild allegation you got any source for that ?
The biggest oxymoron in this whole thing is the title slate "Piers Morgan" Uncensored, then it has "RUclips" on the bottom.. smh
Why are you watching?
Science teaches not to have intellectual conviction on something that does not have definitive conclusion = theory.
It’s ironic that the smartest person on the panel (Eric) is the only one who respects the capacity of the general public to weigh up ideas intelligently
lmao imagine thinking that Eric is the smartest person on the planet :)))
They said the panel, of which he is.
Eric is genuinely a good guy and I enjoyed his appearance and we need more Erics.
@@rubyrubi1165reading skills might not be up to snuff.
It's ironic that the people who agree with this message are not commenting because they are intelligent
Eric did a great job on Rogan. He handled the situation with class. Any “scientist” that criticizes him for that is filled with hubris and sanctimony. Snobbery doesn’t gain any points. I appreciate Eric W.
Well don't you know that it's not actually science unless there's hubris, condescension, haughtiness and snobbery?
If he debunked Terrence Howard, then I wish more people would do that. Instead of thinking they are "above it all".
I’d add jealousy to the list as well
@@user-ct8tc2dd9vdid an amazing job - pointing out flaws, showed areas of promise, didn’t come across as arrogant.
Well done Eric.
the fact that you say debunked blows my mind. If there's a god please help us, we're going downhill fast
Get professor Dave on next time
If Terrence Howard is not telling the truth or misunderstanding his drone shapes. Then prove that he is not scientifically and stop the discussion.
He agreed with Terrence that the universe is not a void. That there exists an Ether as the medium of space, not a vacuum.
You didn't have to put in that cheesy music when Terrence was explaining stuff 😂😂
I noticed that too😂😂😂 why did they do him like that?
Probably bc without it, much of our population would be right on board with it 😂
Because it was funny and shouldn't be taken seriously?
@@Illhostility99.99% of our population can’t disprove what he is saying including the producers of this show. This was just gross manipulation of what people should think.
@@cyberftum, what he said was disproven multiple times though, so there’s that.
I love that "I want friends, I need friends" so humble.
I trust science, but those who interpret and seem to posture as the authority can not be trusted.
Fabulous discussion. Loved every second of it.
Eric is such a class act - reminding everybody what a grown up man with respect, a heavy set of balls and a large heart looks like.
No, he is simply using Terrance Howard to promote his own grift. That is all.
@@LordVader1887suppose that's one take. A pretty foolish one.
👍🏾
100%
Yeah its a grift, he is using Terrance to spring his public career. Unfortunately he's boring so...
This is why I'm such a huge fan of Eric. We live in a strange world where scientists, who have a public presence, have a reputation for being incurious and condescending. Eric is well-mannered, but he has balls. Academia is riddled with cowards
Your last sentence is very much spot on.
Eric is Terrence Howards with PHD
Well said ... You person. 😊
I didn’t knew trash has manners.
exactly; filled with too many poindexters who are easily bullied into compliance
Sorry Pierce. Not going to give you any views on this. Joe Rogan owns this topic with Terrence Howard
Translation for those who don't understand Terrence Howard = You need six hammer the ice cream to monkey of eleven dizzy! Get it now?
Mr. Weinstein gets it. I hope many others like him start speaking out
Every one on the the panel got it except the snob scientist
@@11235but they deferred to eric because he's the man on the field
Unfortunately gatekeeping will always be a thing. Weinstein is the exception of which a rule will never go away due to ego and insecurity.
As a key member of the Intellectual dark web member, he has been speaking out for a few years. I found out about him in 2019. Look it up
@@SeventhWing It's not "gatekeeping." It's that the scientific community will ensure and protect the integrity and principles of the scientific method.
Do you condemn 1x1=2?
Bruh!!! Omg
That's funny
Racists!
This has to boom and be the top comment 😂
THAT IS ANTISEMETIC
You guys are treating Terrence Howard like Einstein when Einstein came out people told the public that his theories were false they wasn't true and now his theories are used commonly now so I'm kind of confused with you guys over here talking bad about this man because he decided to show a different side of the science table
The irony of talking about somebody's methods and philosophies without having them on the show is wild!
He probably refused
He probably asked who and who were going to be there, and he said nuuuuh. I'll pass. 😅
Dr. Eric talked with Terrence like a decent human being.
Yeah, right. He sounded like a Mafia boss.
No he did not. What did you watch. This man was very condescending and fake!
@@unityorelse2375, he was right though
@@cperez1000 now this is really weird, I'm not even a fan of terrence but it's clear that this guy doesn't let him talk which i do understand why..
while watching that podcast i wanna hear more of terrence reasoning, but most of the time its deflected to something else
basically its going nowhere, and it was stated early on eric wants to be in control
@@nnnnnbcsyihgfchj Eric was talking to a guy who was telling the world that their whole lives are based off of a false reality and their life's work meant pretty much nothing, on the world biggest platform. I think Eric handled it like a true gentlemen.
Mock all you want. I worked in a university for a decade and Eric Weinstein and Terrance Howard are more in line with the spirit of collaborative research that advances science far more than the extremely brittle perspectives of some of the others. When you start to believe that the only people who can give insight on a problem are people who are trained “exactly like you” your progress will stagnate
Priests.
Yeah, I don't believe you
Exactly. Every scientists is trained the same way by people that control their field. Outsiders are condemned or disregarded as not being worthy of audience. Thinking outside the box is how some of the world's best technologies have been invented. Besides all that, it seems as if there is a cancelation campaign being waged against Terrance Howard. He's been ridiculed on almost every media platform for some reason or the other for the past year or so. Ever since he said that African Americans shouldn't have to pay taxes, he's been targeted. Could be a coincidence, but maybe not
Fa sho, fa sho! Folks have lost the thread of what collaboration looks like, nor have any idea what constructive criticism looks like or what it’s value might be.
Eric said exactly that in the interview though. In The Joe Rogan episode he says word for word. The scientific method does not prove something as true, agreement of peers does. Had he been alive when Galileo was around, he would have been calling Galileo a moron
Until A scientist can explain how MAGIC actually works in a simple way then all those critiquing attitudes towards Howard are clownish. 😊
Eric really earned my respect for appearing with Terrance and basically teaching him and being so patient
Eric is the type of person I would get along great with. His way of confronting issues without totally dismissing the entire thing and breaking every single topic out with critical thinking, while acknowledging the good shows the type of person he is in the scientific community. Need more like him.
totally agree .. he has something unique.. v high IQ but also v high EQ (emotional quotient)
@@dandabashhes autistic
@@dandabash yeah, that's rare today.
Agree, he’s the type of tutor you would want as a young Physics student.
Knows enough that you know you’re beneath him, but humble enough so that he doesn’t destroy your confidence to learn.
No we don't
lol Neil DeGrasse “science is consensus” Tyson got rightly smacked down
Thank you Mr. Weinstein for calling out Neil de Grasse Tyson for his arrogance, dismissiveness, and hypocrisy.
Love the lemon eating look Piers has when he is reminded of his vacine lunacy
😂
He started squirming in his chain! 😂😂😂😂
What vaccine lunacy??
He probably milked that too just like all the wars rn
😆🤭
Actor acting like a scientist. Talking about Neil not Terrence.
That’s dumb. Neil did his time.
🤣 🤣 🤣
@@user-dj9iu2et3rDid his time regurgitating and shilling, yes.
Mentioning Terrence and Neil in the same sentence is like 1X1=2.
@@user-dj9iu2et3r Neil is a perfect example of pay me a dollar and I'll regurgitate whatever you want.
I agree that Neil deGrasse Tyson is the most notable scientist alive today.
It is nice to see that Eric giving Terrence respect where it is deserved, self taught and curious about new ideas.
But a nut job.
I really enjoyed rogans podcast with Eric and Terrence
You are an lDlOT like hustle and flow man
Terrance is not there , although smart. He knows buzzwords that the average person, ie you, doesn't, so he sounds like he has something. He does not understand math and physics at all.
@@brianmeen2158I agree both podcasts where extremely entertaining. I didn't agree with anything terrance said but I found it fascinating
I trust science. It’s scientists that I don’t trust.
I think this is a worthy comment
Agreed. The scientists and the politicisation of it are issues. The scientific method itself I do not have issues with.
👍
Thats fair asf
What about them don't you trust?
Neologism, grandiosity, paranoia,...who is going to give this guy a diagnosis?
Please watch Professor Dave discuss this.
Please don't. He is one of the most caustic and angry podcasters on RUclips. If ever there was a true believer and disciple of science as an infallible arbiter of knowledge, it's "professor" Dave. I've never seen anyone treat science as a religion more than "professor" Dave.
Terrence needed this.
Much respect to Eric for how he handled him.
yeah and short guys can get girlfriends
I assume you're short@@President_NotSure
That was FANTASTIC, Piers! Please do more like this. Thoroughly civil, thoughtful, provocative, and informative.
This used to be my guilty pleasure. Piers is the new trash shows of the 80's. But I no longer laugh at the mentally ill.
This comment section is SHATTERING my faith in humanity... Some of yall are either regarded, or insane.
I’d say most and both.
Lol...I'm highly regarded in some circles.
And what side are you on exactly?
Piers should have started by defining science for the dummies... But to be fair he said "mainstream science" so I suppose he can't even define it.
Nobody cares
Neil degrasse Tyson is the most pompous arrogant scientist on the public front 😂
You’re 180 degrees off
Totally agree 💯
I mean that’s kind of unavoidable for any human who is worshipped like he is lol
What is his most significant scientific contribution (aside from media)?
@pricklycats nobody worshipping that nihher
I can NOT believe harvard would let the lady stay after finding out she plagiarized her work! what a time to be alive!
Harvard loves plagiarizers.
So a woman plagerised the work of another woman named Harvard. Grammar and the use of proper sentences is important in science. It all began in 1875. A then young Newton met a poet named Alfred Mitchell Spencer. Anyway, ask Weinstein to explain the rest. I'm bored.
@@Magneticvortex-kk4gbI like rocks
Hahaha, a woman and black.
Agreed. But none of that has to do with Terrance being nutty af and Candace is an insufferable grifter
Is this the only episode where the guests never screamed at each other? heh
Guy in the middle is the typically arrogant 'trust science' academic.
Eric was 100% right and he opened my eyes to how problematic peer review is
Well pure science reviewing led to lockdowns
Peer review is problematic, but the least problematic way proposed that proves to be successful in finding errors and advancing good science.
Eric is just mad because he is theory of everything washy much better than Howards.
Eric just wants attention. Nothing important said in all his important speech
Well, it's working. He's getting attention.
"You mean the Dunning Kruger effect? Yea, that's kind of ironic for Neil Degrasse Tyson to be labeling someone else with that."
Loved that comment!
🦕
What are you even talking about
It's the difference between 10,000+ hours and 1000.
8:09
I'm really uncomfortable with the phrase 'Terence Howard's science'. Although formal education in science isn't required, if you want to talk to Eric Weinstein with any success, it would be an enormous help to have a couple of them. Terence Howard does not. I applaud Eric Weinstein for being so patient and gracious.
Eric Weinstein just alluded to what Terrence Howard discovered at the 16:30 minute mark...
Yes 🎉
Weinstein is a clown. He knows way too little and is as ignorant as Howard.
Eric Weinstein's stance was the right way to approach the conversation. Pseudo-scientists sadly won't go away, and I respect Eric's attempt to clarify the issue with the hope that it will be well received. Reason vs online bullying.
I mean Neil did the same thing and Terrence ran to JRE to cry about it. He gave him an actual peer review.
I'll trust dr weinstein, the man is openminded.
Eric is awesome so is this Tom character
@@BlaqAdamPeer review 😆
@@nicolavincenzo7927he's an entrepreneur
Yet Piers believed a load of bollox from Fouchy!
So what!? He is also able to change his mind, which is more important.
He will say what hes paid to say. Piers has shown many times he has no moral character @etch-a-sketch
He doesn’t have a scientific background that would have allowed him to reasonably disagree with him at the time.
Why do they use the term "unhinged" we have a term already..its called "stupid"
Eric has some deep hatred toward Neil. NDT was a lot more kind to TH than he should have been. Howard is delusional and Eric is placating that delusion to leech some followers. Eric these days is more grifter than scientist. Dunning Kruger fits Howard perfectly.
Please watch Professor Dave’s review of this.
Definitely some beef between Eric and NDT. Prolly stole his pocket protector 30 years ago.
@@rentmane 🤓🤣
lol Eric is a billion times more intelligent then Neil will ever be. As Gary Nolan said, Neil is just a TV guy.
Piers Morgan show is the epitome of the Dunning Kruger Effect
Why? You dont think these guys have legitimate credentials?
As is your comment
Western credentials @@liammorgans7329
What? You can't be referring to Eric! Maybe Piers, but not Eric. 😂
You must be a vegan...
Neil's opinion on the vax told me all I needed to know about his "science".
😂😂
You are against vaccines? How is natural immunity to Polio working out?
That man is a joke
100%
@@calicoskybandjust stop it already. You made a joke out of yourself the last three years.
You Can’t Shake Eric!
His Character is Amazing
Why can’t we all just go watch Coneheads?? Please??
I am an MD PhD. It is widely known that over the past 50 years, science has been subject to biases. Those now have become worse with politicization. I trust science that I evaluate but not Mainstream politicians, people like Neil or Eric, or media.
Terrance?
Facts
Is Eric Weinstein not saying the exact same thing? He seems trustworthy to me because of his disdain for “mainstream” science
@@ryanjamesc9996 He's trustworthy in the sense that he believes in real science. But he's not totally committed to it. He's also a businessman who works for venture firms. Thus, he likely has biases and things he would rather not discuss. That's why we should listen to people with a little bit of skepticism.
@@ryanjamesc9996agreed
I don't understand the controversy over this. Terrance Howard presented some wild ideas and was more than willing to have them challenged by an expert like Wienstein. Now we can make up our own minds. That's how it's supposed to be! That's healthy and necessary!
Exactly. Piers and guests seem to think they can decide what people can discuss.
Obviously Terrence was correct about more than the religion of scientism wants out, and Their power is being threatened.
@@pseudoscientist8010he’s definitely not correct & if you think he is it’s because you don’t understand elementary level times tables
"Make up our own minds" is a strange way of putting it. Scientific claims can be disproven, it's not politics.
Make up your own mind about what 1×1 equals?
I was done with Terrance Howard, when he said he was in the womb waiting to come out.
I love how respectful this dialogue is, the panel didn’t speak until Piers let them know it was their turn. I can applaud the intelligence, patience, and class
Lol, the panel didn't speak because their microphones were turned off. Meanwhile they had to listen to Weinstein spew his pseudo-intellectual garbage and. This whole interview was embarrassing to listen to. Giving any amount of airtime to clowns like Weinstein and Howard is an affront to common sense.
@@user-gn1fe8yv6xyou use a lot of really smart words. I wonder if your brain matches your mouth.
Who died and made these people the gate keepers of peoples’ minds, motivations and lives??? It’s nauseating.🤢
Nauseating and infuriating.
They’ve gained their positions via education, which we all know is broken…
@@PhotosByDre-b5vAre the funding issues taught in school? Their hands are tied, as far as doing science. They have to please the funders. Journals have to please the advertisers.
🙄🥱 if you don’t trust hard science, math and engineering then you should throw your phone in the lake
No one owns mathematics. You can choose to learn it or disregard it. If you disregard it you will think Terrence Howard ramblings are right.
Eric Weinstein is now officially a superstar to me right now. His understanding of societies reluctance to trust the establishment is absolutely refreshing. We desperately need like minded individuals to be vocal and lead the fight to keep humanity safe from itself.
He's a weasel
@@Astarov
ask your mommy
What Eric did on Rogan was kindly correcting someone and helping them forward it was .. refreshing and noble prize worthy
@@zaypierson6255 😄
I trust in the scientific method -
but not in all of acadenia.
The truth is …everyone sounds crazy until time proves their “sudoecience” right. 🤷♂️
Such a great episode, no shouting, just respecting the argument and bringing it to the public. How refreshing.
Because he brought on a guy and 2 of his friends
They were on a great debate until the doosh on the left piped up and interrupted them and tried to hijack the subject.
@@PhilipstyrerNo, because he brought on 3 intelligent people.
@@helencheung2537no because it’s not a debate he brought on three people agreeing on the same subject. This is not a debate, its a form on trying to cancel anyone with a different theory to anything ‘science related’ 🙄🙄🙄
that’s not how study academics argue they just slip insults in
Tyson lost me when he said he had no problem with trans in womens sports..and his reasoning for it.
Same here.
😂😂 who cares! you are so easily distracted,
Didn’t he say we should measure testosterone’s or something daft like that
NDT is still convinced that autoritys did a good job in the time of the pandemic.
So smarth, got huge ego, but out of touch with reality.
@@livioangelAnd you're so easily propagandized. So there's that.
It’s not about being right. It’s about being honest about what you do or don’t know and allowing dissent. Authorities denied discourse so we don’t trust them that simple
“Authorities denied discourse”
👍🏼👏👍🏼👏👍🏼👏👏👍🏼👍🏼
EXACTLY !
Trust has been lost
Nailed it
Terrence can't admit what he doesn't know
Eric obviously has the balls in this conversation
I'm a man, and I have three kids just like Brigit Macron
edit: watch the coping and seething below...
So ur female Partner(or ur a female) gave birth 3 times. Good to know
You're a baiter.
So.., you have 3 boys
@@SillyGoose2024a master baiter.
So you’re Brigit Mocron’s babies daddy?
Eric was being gracious to Howard BECAUSE he's a scientist. Einstein once said to a group of scientists: "You all dismiss my theory yet none of you have been able to disprove it". Science is always uncertain and a continuous process of elimination.
Same thing he did with terrance howard.
Exactly 👍
Eric was being gracious because he is usually gracious and I think attempts to be a human being first- above other roles.
@@GooseHen25 Agreed, but to him being a scientist means being open to every possiblity and that is what he dislikes in the current science. It's a corrupt power hierarchy.
That was quite possibly the most thoughtful and reasoned comment I have ever seen here, thank you. I have come to realize that Piers likes having guests who fight. We - human beings in general - do not need more of that. Maybe having everyone in the same room for these discussions would help?