Brand New Purchase!! Tudor Black Bay 36. Compared to Rolex Oyster Perpetual 36 and Explorer 114270

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 12 сен 2024

Комментарии • 91

  • @jakobhhasli3676
    @jakobhhasli3676 2 года назад +25

    "And i already have two rolex pepsis" nice subtle flex - great review!

    • @yyzca6126
      @yyzca6126 5 месяцев назад

      Yes nice flex if you have a Rolex you must tell. What’s the point of owning without telling. 😮

  • @robertz2809
    @robertz2809 2 года назад +20

    Thank you for the excellent review and comparisons. I believe I have watched every Tudor BB 36 and 41 review on RUclips but yours has been the most comprehensive considering comparisons and hands on review. I'll be purchasing the 41 mm version from the local AD tomorrow. I've considered both the 36mm and 41mm sizes but I feel that the larger size would be more appropriate for my wrist. I really do like the dial proportions of the 36.

    • @sc1
      @sc1  2 года назад +3

      Hopefully, you can try on both the 36 and 41 before purchasing. I'll say the 36mm wears similar to a 38mm. But if your wrist is larger than 7-7.5in, then 41mm would be better.

    • @maitrehg
      @maitrehg 2 года назад

      You can't go wrong. Both are fantastic. My wrist is 7,75 and I can wear both.

  • @jackrayner1263
    @jackrayner1263 2 года назад +4

    Fun fact: the Tudor clasp opens from the bottom of the shield which makes it easier to open

  • @danryan4137
    @danryan4137 2 года назад +3

    Really love this piece. I really wish they would have put the fabric Camo strap in the box but I guess people will buy it regardless. It’s not a dealbreaker but it was a classy pr move. Really nice photography too.

    • @sc1
      @sc1  2 года назад

      Thanks for watching

  • @comeonman7423
    @comeonman7423 2 года назад +6

    Absolutely love these 3 watches, I think the OP36 my fave

  • @aps5041
    @aps5041 2 года назад +6

    I've got the blue dial model and love it. So easy to read day or night. I've got 4 links on the 6 o'clock side and 7 on the 12 o'clock and the bend in the clasp arm doesn't stick at all. Also, they switched to Selitta SW200 in 2020.

    • @sc1
      @sc1  2 года назад

      Blue is nice too. I was surprised they didn't have one in stock.
      Did you buy extra links, or do you have the 41mm? I don't think mine even came with that many links in total.

    • @aps5041
      @aps5041 2 года назад

      @@sc1 No, it's the 36mm and I believe the AD took out 2 links when they initially fit it. One of the 7 links on the 12 o'clock side is the link with the pin for the micro adjust.

    • @comeonman7423
      @comeonman7423 2 года назад +2

      absolutely love the blue, such a beautiful shade of blue.

  • @Martin000-45
    @Martin000-45 2 года назад +9

    What a nice review!! I love it, especially how you compared it to OP and Explorer. I own both BB36 and 124270, and as you said, they are similar yet different. Just subscribed. You deserve many
    more!!

    • @sc1
      @sc1  2 года назад

      Glad you liked it!

  • @KCTimeShare
    @KCTimeShare 2 года назад +3

    Another great video! Congrats on your new watch, it is a nice addition to your collection, SC!

    • @sc1
      @sc1  2 года назад

      Thanks for watching

  • @ms.t6260
    @ms.t6260 2 года назад +4

    I have this exact watch i bought it when I could not find any rolex in 2019i love it

    • @gafakyusef6201
      @gafakyusef6201 7 месяцев назад

      @ms.t6260 did you end up getting the rolex?

    • @ms.t6260
      @ms.t6260 7 месяцев назад

      @@gafakyusef6201 yes!!! I sure did! Waited 4 months and got it finally 7 weeks ago! Hasn’t left my wrist yet.

  • @michaelsorrentino3346
    @michaelsorrentino3346 Год назад +2

    The watch bracelet has a very beautiful taper. The Snowflake hands work very well and it holds a lot of lume. The only thing I wish it had was a glide lock system.

    • @sc1
      @sc1  Год назад

      I think the next version will have the T-fit clasp when they update it.

    • @FRST2012
      @FRST2012 Год назад

      I am predicting this will be updated at watches and wonders in 2023. Along with the in-house movement.

  • @marshallcollins8634
    @marshallcollins8634 2 года назад +1

    I love the rattle of a bracelet. The first good watch was a tag Heuer night Diver in the 80's. And a man I respected very much wore a Rolex with a rattelie bracelet.For some reason that has set a benchmark ( for me) I now have nerve damage in my hands ,so a small light watch is all I can wear. I'm looking at the Tudor 39 in Tit. Thank you for the review. One of the best I have seen, but now I have a different option.

    • @sc1
      @sc1  2 года назад

      Good to hear a different perspective. I've always preferred solidity and modernity, and didn't like the hollow looseness of the older bracelets, but I can see how the rattle can provoke some nostalgia.
      I still have a Submariner Date 11610 purchased new from 2005 which has some rattle, but I love it for the great memories it holds for me.
      I thought about the Pelagos 39, but I think I will pass. Everything about it looks great, but I prefer the weight of steel, and it would look too similar to my Submariner Date anyway.

  • @robkeeling7001
    @robkeeling7001 2 года назад +3

    A great small watch if it also had a 70 hr power reserve it would be almost perfect.

    • @nekenwong
      @nekenwong 2 года назад +1

      The new BB36 S&G (jubilee bracelet) have a new COSC movement with 70hrs power reserve. Probably will offered in steel version in a couple of years.

    • @robkeeling7001
      @robkeeling7001 2 года назад

      @@nekenwong I did not know that, it makes a difference I believe also the crown could be a tad larger as well as the glass table as in gshocks being 2 mm below the bezel and just one more thing if the clasp could be of the sliding type for easy adjustment, then the price tag could be justified.

    • @sc1
      @sc1  2 года назад

      It looks like the new BB Steel and Gold versions have the T-Fit clasp to make sliding adjustments on-the-go. And they also have deeper grooves on the crown, and 70 hour power reserve. These improvement haven't made it to the steel BB36 yet, but yes, probably will be incorporated in a couple years. I don't think the steel BB36 has been updated for the last 4 years.

    • @germcevoy
      @germcevoy 2 года назад +1

      @@sc1 quite a price increase too though. A new movement and bracelet/clasp is sure to increase the price of the steel models.

  • @james6048
    @james6048 2 года назад +1

    I love that watch it's a great buy. The only thing stopping me buy one is I can't get my head round it saying self winding. It really bothers me cause it's a superb watch.
    Great addition to your collection.

    • @sc1
      @sc1  2 года назад

      Fair enough! I never thought about it before, but now that you mention it, that terminology is a little quirky.

  • @robkeeling7001
    @robkeeling7001 2 года назад +1

    Very interesting I think these changes will make all the difference, one thing I have always founf strange, is that with the exception of gshock watches have flush exposed glass if they kept the table 1 or 2 mm below it would help protect the glass area, al.

  • @pauldyson5121
    @pauldyson5121 Год назад

    Awesome review. At the time the Rolex movement would have been Chrono spec and the Tudor a Sellida SW200-1, so a big difference in accuracy specs per day! Do you still have the Tudor, is it accurate? I've been trying to find out what spec Sellita Tudor fitted - Standard/Special/Premium/(Chrono) - hoping it's premium +/- 4 to 15 sec/day.

  • @dutchberry
    @dutchberry Год назад +3

    jealous. this would be my last watch hopefully

  • @jomoonen59
    @jomoonen59 2 года назад +2

    Clean camerawork🤘💯🍀🙋‍♂️

    • @sc1
      @sc1  2 года назад

      Thanks 💯

  • @emaeder18
    @emaeder18 2 года назад +1

    Nice looking watch! Definitely a yes for the Speedmaster, I had a 1969 and 1974 models and I will go for 2801 pretty soon :)

  • @roylobue7125
    @roylobue7125 2 года назад +1

    Hey SC - I’m on the fence with this Tudor…if you had your pick at retail price for these 3 watches shown here, which one would you pick? Also, I recommend the speedy…I have modern Rolex sports watches and the speedy always gets wrist time - I have a sapphire sandwich but would take hesilite no problem!

    • @sc1
      @sc1  2 года назад +1

      If I could have only one at retail, I would of course get the Explorer 36mm, but the problem is trying to find one. I bought the pre-owned Explorer 114270 as a substitute. If I could get the OP again, I would choose one of the new colorful dials: red, yellow, or turquoise. The Black Bay 36 adds a different kind of character - more casual.

  • @adamkidson4444
    @adamkidson4444 Год назад

    Do you own all 3? Also the ETA/selitta is a big bonus for me. I've had enough of waiting for a OP or explorer and no longer want to play the Rolex game. I do really love Tudor so just bought this bb36

    • @sc1
      @sc1  Год назад

      I needed to reduce my collection, so I sold the BB36. It’s a good watch, but too similar to the others. I updated to the Explorer 124270 and gifted the 114270 to my nephew. I’m trying to sell the OP36 now.

  • @babakganji1045
    @babakganji1045 2 года назад +3

    With all these watches not sure when or if you end up wearing all your watches. I have a small collection of 5 and I only wear my Milgauss :D

    • @sc1
      @sc1  2 года назад +1

      I do wear all of my watches, but some of them get more infrequent wear than others. (My Milgauss is a frequent wear, too)
      The collection IS starting to get out of hand now, so I'm thinking about selling my 16710 BLRO and my (!) 114270 EXP. I'm tired of the rattling bracelets, and I want to transition to an all modern, all AD collection.
      I can't let go of my very first two Rolexes, the 2004 DateJust and 2007 Sub Date from the AD, because of sentimental value, so I might retire them from the rotation, and put them away.
      I also made 2 new Rolex purchases from my AD since this video posted, very Heavy-Hitters, and those videos will be posted soon!

    • @babakganji1045
      @babakganji1045 2 года назад +1

      @@sc1 I cant wait to see the gold daytona ;) I have an older pre ceramic sub with the same bracelet as your explorer 1 but I kinda like it. Yes it doesnt feel as solid as a modern piece but its old school and very light weight. I was thinking of adding the explorer 1 to my collection. I had a 39 mm that I sold but I have similar wrist as yours and the 36 would be the perfect fit.

    • @sc1
      @sc1  2 года назад

      It's not a gold Daytona, but that's a very close guess! I can't wait to reveal the video tomorrow...
      I wish I could get the new Explorer 36, but it's very difficult from my AD right now.

  • @casvalxxtk3492
    @casvalxxtk3492 2 года назад +1

    It's as thick as a Submariner. But it's luxurious and beautiful.
    thanx

  • @hagenuk88
    @hagenuk88 Год назад

    Nice one there! i recently got the bb36 too, and felt that the manual winding (albeit smooth) has alot of resistance, and needs some effort to wind it. the reseller said its normal and the same for tudors. is that your experience too?

    • @sc1
      @sc1  Год назад

      My winding was smooth with no resistance, may because it was very new when purchased.

  • @avatarx01
    @avatarx01 2 года назад +2

    Beautifull watch! Very versatile!

  • @bulldogms
    @bulldogms 2 года назад +1

    Really like the silver dial version but can't get myself to spend $3k for $120 ETA movement no matter what Tudor does for it. The margins on this watch must be insane.

    • @jeeperspeepers8323
      @jeeperspeepers8323 2 года назад

      Tudor is now using Selitta movements! What a shit company.

    • @bulldogms
      @bulldogms 2 года назад +2

      @@jeeperspeepers8323 I don't mind the Selitta but not for $3k!!

  • @lluislsm
    @lluislsm 2 года назад +1

    Nice review. What is your wrist size?

    • @sc1
      @sc1  2 года назад +1

      6.5 inches. I needed to take out 2 links.

  • @mr2izm
    @mr2izm 2 года назад +2

    Simple and elegant. Nice piece 👌

    • @sc1
      @sc1  2 года назад

      Thank you! Cheers!

  • @cesargarcia5390
    @cesargarcia5390 2 года назад

    What a clear and objective review.. I am about to buy one. But i have no idea which one 41 vs 36 habing 7.5 inches but my forearms ar not big i have on the slender side proportions and i have seen that while wearing a polo shirt or t shirt watch size matters. Congratulations very nice collection. By the way i received a
    Vintage Omega speedmaster 1965 Ed White is so beautiful watch and it has a nicea measure i think it's 39 or 40mm. I want the Tudor as a daily wearer.

    • @sc1
      @sc1  2 года назад +1

      I have 6.5 inch wrists and very small forearms, so I can only wear 36mm with short sleeves, but I feel fine wearing 40mm or even 42mm with long sleeves or jacket.

  • @bryanmorgan758
    @bryanmorgan758 2 года назад +1

    Great conclusion! 👍🏼

  • @ACDandMe
    @ACDandMe 2 года назад +2

    Beautiful watch 💛

    • @sc1
      @sc1  2 года назад

      thanks!

  • @MichalW95
    @MichalW95 2 года назад +1

    So its now a certified chronometer watch?

    • @sc1
      @sc1  2 года назад +1

      Not sure, but I don't think Tudor tries to get this one certified.

  • @TexasBuyer2001
    @TexasBuyer2001 2 года назад

    Nice review, great comparison!

    • @sc1
      @sc1  2 года назад

      Thanks!

  • @chriscon8463
    @chriscon8463 2 года назад

    Very nice watch/watches! Great review!

    • @sc1
      @sc1  2 года назад +1

      Thanks for watching!

  • @watchingandseeing
    @watchingandseeing 2 года назад

    You prefer this watch over BB 58?

    • @sc1
      @sc1  2 года назад +1

      after having it a while, I probably like the Bb58 slightly more than the Bb36

  • @skoffco
    @skoffco 2 года назад

    Personally I don’t care what brand movement it has.. you can’t see it anyway. Bottom line, if it keeps decent time ,that good enough for me.

    • @sc1
      @sc1  Год назад

      In this case with Tudor, I didn't think the movement was a significant negative.

  • @marlonr391
    @marlonr391 Год назад

    Excellent review, I agree with your comments 👍

    • @sc1
      @sc1  Год назад

      Thanks! 👍

  • @binyard1972
    @binyard1972 2 года назад

    Not sure I like the dots on the face would have preferred batons that would be perfect for me

    • @sc1
      @sc1  2 года назад +1

      I think that’s just the way Tudor likes to roll.
      Baton markers would basically be a Rolex Explorer

    • @binyard1972
      @binyard1972 2 года назад

      @@sc1 yes I know or maybe get rid of that horrid snowflake second hand the dial is an issue for me other than that I'd buy it in a heartbeat

    • @binyard1972
      @binyard1972 2 года назад

      Ahh but the rolex explorer has numbers too batons no numbers perfect but then like you say that's how they all are or roll wid it ya lol ps love your reviews I'm just crazy about watches ⌚️ that's all

    • @sc1
      @sc1  2 года назад +1

      @@binyard1972 Not saying that I absolutely love the Tudor. It’s just different, and much more casual and sporty. Since owning it for the last 2 months, I actually like my Explorer and OP better. IMO, Rolex has better build quality and design cohesion, but Tudor is much more affordable and available.

  • @DanT288
    @DanT288 2 года назад +1

    That is a very nice watch bro 👌

    • @sc1
      @sc1  2 года назад

      Thanks 👍

  • @4booger403
    @4booger403 2 года назад

    Which of the 3 seems the largest?

    • @sc1
      @sc1  2 года назад +1

      I haven’t measured them, but I think this OP looks the largest, because of the lugs.

    • @4booger403
      @4booger403 2 года назад

      @@sc1 Oh I would've thought that the BB36 because of the slap sided case and large indices. Thanks for such a thorough video!

    • @sc1
      @sc1  2 года назад

      Oh, You're right in terms of case thickness. The BB36 does look bulkier.

  • @14thierry14henry
    @14thierry14henry 2 года назад

    had to turn this up full blast

    • @sc1
      @sc1  Год назад

      Sorry!

    • @14thierry14henry
      @14thierry14henry Год назад

      @@sc1 Just a note for future reference. Great vid nonetheless :)

  • @infernogamers168
    @infernogamers168 6 месяцев назад

    A whole review and not many wrist shots? Pretty poor

  • @Name-zd5fq
    @Name-zd5fq 2 года назад

    I don't like the unevenly applied lume and the crappy Sellita movement.