Mercedes EQE 53 4Matic+ range test

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 6 сен 2024
  • Get 30 day free Premium trial on ABRP by using referral code "Teslabjorn":
    abetterroutepl...
    Get 15 % discount when shopping at www.bilkompone... by using code "Teslabjorn". Worldwide shipping available (except for a few countries).
    Get 15 % discount (also works on discounted prices) when ordering from Stormberg online by using discount code "Teslabjorn":
    www.stormberg....
    Kempower make awesome EV chargers:
    kempower.com/t...
    Want to sell your Tesla/EV? marcusbil.no/s...
    Want to buy a Tesla/EV? marcusbil.no/b...
    Leasing a Tesla/EV? marcusbil.no/l...
    MisterGreen EV leasing:
    mstr.gr/bjornn...
    Results from my range tests, banana box tests and other goodies here:
    docs.google.co...
    Main folder with everything:
    drive.google.c...
    My equipment:
    www.foto.no/ec...
    www.foto.no/ec...
    www.foto.no/ec...
    www.foto.no/ca...
    www.foto.no/ca...
    www.foto.no/ca...
    www.foto.no/si...
    www.foto.no/r%...
    www.foto.no/lo...
    www.foto.no/fo...
    The app I use when connecting to OBD ports on most EVs:
    play.google.co...
    ScanMyTesla app for showing battery temperature, etc:
    play.google.co...
    / scanmytesla
    www.e-mobility...
    www.e-mobility...
    The OBD dongle I use in Tesla, Leaf, Ioniq, e-Niro, e-Soul, i3, ID3/ID4 (Android only):
    www.obdlink.co...
    My Artlist playlist:
    artlist.io/myc...
    Most of my music is from Artlist.io. If you sign up for one year and use my referral link, you will get two months free:
    artlist.io/art...
    Donation links:
    streamlabs.com/...
    / teslabjorn
    My live channel:
    / teslabjornlive24
    Teslabjørn Discord server:
    / discord
    Reduce food waste and get great deals on food:
    toogoodtogo.no/

Комментарии • 88

  • @fleixfire6641
    @fleixfire6641 Год назад +64

    The reason for the lower consumption for the EQS is because it has a lower drag coefficient than the EQE, and that’s because the longer back-end on the EQS reduces turbulence more than the EQE

    • @jkev1425
      @jkev1425 Год назад +3

      Drag coefficient ist as important as frontal area. If the EQS is 1cm wider it increases the wind resistance as well. It's the same factor. A * dragC. Is the EQS wider or higher then EQE? 🤔

    • @fleixfire6641
      @fleixfire6641 Год назад +7

      @@jkev1425 The EQS is 35mm slimmer in the front than the EQE and the same height with around a half meter more in length

    • @jkev1425
      @jkev1425 Год назад +3

      @@fleixfire6641 Thanks for checking!

    • @ani_b
      @ani_b Год назад +1

      @Fleix yes absolutely right! The longer, smoother back end is one of the biggest parts for reducing turbulence and hence reducing drag. The EQXX is a case in point, with the retractable "wing".

    • @CulturedThugPoster
      @CulturedThugPoster Год назад

      Bjork had to weigh the EQS fully charged to see how much all those electrons weighed.

  • @chrischild3667
    @chrischild3667 Год назад +6

    Battery temperature gauges should be standard on all cars. I see why they aren't. But they should be!

  • @RobertPuklin
    @RobertPuklin Год назад +2

    I like:
    - interior build quality, materials, haptic
    - streamlined aero with a large battery for great highway range
    - suspension, NVH insulation
    - sound system and effects
    Dislike:
    - missing heatpump
    - missing (motorized) frunk
    - no real 1-pedal driving, regen resets on each drive
    - capacitive buttons (steering wheel, main panel, seat buttons)
    - hatch opening

  • @ItsOnlyElectric
    @ItsOnlyElectric Год назад +7

    Yes, normally the #EQE53AMG is running staggered with 295/30 21" at the back.

  • @danieleriksson8685
    @danieleriksson8685 Год назад +2

    The reason for higher consumtion is that AMG models has different battery Managment and components that priorities performance and multiple laps on a race track to low consumption.

  • @OverlordActual
    @OverlordActual Год назад +11

    I hope one day Tesla shows as much energy usage information as Mercedes does. It's just fun to see.

    • @jkev1425
      @jkev1425 Год назад +2

      The latest update shows really everything in Tesla energy consumption.

    • @OverlordActual
      @OverlordActual Год назад +2

      @@jkev1425 I'm on FSD Beta so hopefully I'll see that new energy app soon. But I mean like the current energy usage from the motors, battery voltage, if one motor is being used or both etc. The really fine grain stuff. Again would just be nice. Not necessary to get that detailed but I would appreciate it.

    • @jkev1425
      @jkev1425 Год назад +3

      @@OverlordActual Ahh okay - with "Scan my Tesla" you have access to nearly everything in the car. Torque on steering wheel, %breake pedal pressed, watt used from heatpump. I usually use it to know my battery temperature and whether I need heat it by driving faster. Everything else is a toy if you not use it like Björn every day for testing purpose in my opinion.

  • @Alexander-ig6jm
    @Alexander-ig6jm Год назад +1

    EQS 580 4MATIC has a quoted weight of 2620kg vs. 2525kg for the AMG EQE 53+ this means the EQS has 3.8% higher mass and rolling resistance assuming roughly equal friction coefficients for the tires (which is probably not true here since you drove one on Goodyear Eagle F1 and the other on Continental VCZ).
    EQS 580 has a cd = 0.2 and a cross-sectional area (new German word for you "Stirnfläche") of 2.51m^2 whereas the EQE 53+ has cd = 0.22 and an (estimated) cross sectional area of 2.48m^2 which means that at the same speed and in the same environment the EQS experiences 8% less drag.
    At 90kph-120kph importance of drag and rolling resistance are about equal which means that drag advantage of the EQS overcompensates for its weight disadvantage. If you would compare range at city-speed, the EQE would probably get better than the EQS since here rolling resistance is more important.
    Of course there may also be secondary effects like differences in power consumption of subsystems of the vehicle, differences in options etc.

  • @dpie4859
    @dpie4859 Год назад +26

    2600kg is ridiculous heavy

  • @tankertanky2481
    @tankertanky2481 9 месяцев назад +1

    I'm waiting for BMW I5 testing on your channel sir.

  • @nathanwolf5547
    @nathanwolf5547 Год назад +1

    Ionity in the UK is expensive. @69p/kWh for a slower charge.

    • @chrischild3667
      @chrischild3667 Год назад +1

      Ionity is a subscription model, like Tesla. 69p is one of the unit rates, yes. Its the guest rate so is highest. If you're a subscriber, or own a car manufactured by an Ionity partner, then you have access to significantly lower prices.

  • @TheKnutselaar
    @TheKnutselaar Год назад +3

    Nice boat

  • @chenwong1036
    @chenwong1036 Год назад +5

    How do you find the suspension and dampening in the EQE compared to EQS? In this video mainly highway and parking is viewed but do you find any differences between these two models so far?

    • @bjornnyland
      @bjornnyland  Год назад +5

      EQE is tighter than EQS

    • @Alberto-mq7gw
      @Alberto-mq7gw Год назад

      @@bjornnyland EQE AMG is tighter than EQS non AMG. Otherwise they should be the same (when both on air suspension, which is optional in the EQE non AMG versions).

  • @thecrow3461
    @thecrow3461 Год назад +1

    1:30 my OCD already kicked in looking at all that dust! What was mercedes thinking with this interior design. I like the outside but the dashboard is butt ugly.

  • @lovethytuber4770
    @lovethytuber4770 Год назад +2

    If money would be no object, would you rather go with the EQE AMG or the BMW i4 M50?

    • @AP13P
      @AP13P Год назад

      Tesla model 3 lr

  • @Air-ic279
    @Air-ic279 Год назад +2

    AMG EQE has a spoiler at the back so less aerodynamic.
    EQS is longer: "Länge läuft!"

  • @trackevs7873
    @trackevs7873 Год назад +1

    Any ideas on idle power consumption in park mode? On a Tesla 300W or above is not uncommon as the car scavenges heat.

  • @veljkodjukic8783
    @veljkodjukic8783 Год назад +2

    Will you be testing the MG4 (Mulan) soon?

  • @AntonChuffeurLH
    @AntonChuffeurLH Год назад +1

    I find it pretty funny you say "EQE 55" when you are just right infront of the emblem that says EQE 53... 😜

  • @Bud_Terence
    @Bud_Terence Год назад +6

    EQS has better aerodynamics, thats why it is more efficient than EQE. But for nordic countries it has a big disadvantage in comparsion to other EVs, no Heatpump😌 ... Seems like the Engineers in Stuttgart called it a day after finishing the aerodynamics, and went home. Or, they had no more spaceleft under the hood, bec. of monstruous Hepa-Filter. 🤣

  • @mariodagostino6401
    @mariodagostino6401 Год назад +1

    I can only imagine all the electric and electronic issues that it will suffer 24 hour past the warranty expiration

  • @ericvet8b
    @ericvet8b Год назад

    Do you think Bjorn is more comfortable than rear wheel drive one? As AMG maybe suspension is better? Seats? Acoustic glass?

  • @rzvqvb
    @rzvqvb Год назад +3

    No acceleration test... Mercedes traction control kaputt?

    • @bjornnyland
      @bjornnyland  Год назад +1

      Wheels just spun

    • @tobiasforsberg2497
      @tobiasforsberg2497 Год назад

      @@bjornnyland That is strange, that car should be able to reduce power to always have optimum wheel slip/traction

  • @bobkerman9818
    @bobkerman9818 Год назад +4

    It's all good and everything but it's still an extremely expensive car.

  • @user-uj8nj4rg5z
    @user-uj8nj4rg5z Год назад +1

    Хороший рамштайн

  • @ericvet8b
    @ericvet8b Год назад

    Oh no!! Just noticed that it’s a 4 door, not 5 door like the EQS/model S… I thought May be my replacement for model 3 in 2 years…, but nope, need a “hatch back” door… 😢

  • @thomashierzberger6945
    @thomashierzberger6945 Год назад

    94° at 120km/h? Thats quiet some Temperature for this Speed!

  • @arnekvinge6073
    @arnekvinge6073 Год назад

    25 °C in oktober??That is insane in Norway.

  • @andrazlogar861
    @andrazlogar861 Год назад +1

    Good stuff

  • @polestar2544
    @polestar2544 Год назад +2

    I love yo colour and the car to ;)

  • @user-uj8nj4rg5z
    @user-uj8nj4rg5z Год назад +1

    Рамштайн

  • @i.r.3645
    @i.r.3645 Год назад

    The S is more efficient for the bloody €40K plus and honestly, it really should be!

  • @francescorosella5782
    @francescorosella5782 Год назад +4

    Can you test The new Renault Megane e tech?😍

  • @airestocky
    @airestocky Год назад +2

    much too heavy - 2,6 t ?? - no way

  • @MrRey84972
    @MrRey84972 Год назад +1

    They’re going to confuse everyone with the damn E”s 😅

  • @GHCarbon
    @GHCarbon Год назад

    du må lage intro med bilkomponenter siden dem også står der :D

  • @futureatob6920
    @futureatob6920 Год назад +5

    Motor and engine are two different things - hope Mercedes also realizes this one day

    • @EinzigfreierName
      @EinzigfreierName Год назад +6

      I don't see the difference in this context. Every motor is an engine but not every engine is a motor. So as long as we are talking about an electric motor the term "engine" can be used as well. At least that's my understanding. But I'm not a native english speaker so take this with a grain of salt :)

    • @Nelson-Man
      @Nelson-Man Год назад +3

      "Motor and engine are interchangeable in standard English."
      Source: Wikipedia article "Engine"

  • @martink.9442
    @martink.9442 Год назад

    Why 95? Is the speedo so wrong?

  • @Arpedk
    @Arpedk Год назад +4

    The new Tesla Model S LR should be about as fast as these AMG Mercedes', Tesla has a 400-500 kg advantage and about the same horsepower. Cannot wait to have the Teslas back after 2 years without S/X, so strange to benchmark with last-gen Teslas.
    Thanks for another useful range test. I would not pay for the performance with a Mercedes way to heavy, just go for maximum range.

    • @AP13P
      @AP13P Год назад

      Model 3 LR can smoke this

    • @Arpedk
      @Arpedk Год назад

      @@AP13P Not so sure, 680 HP is quite a lot more than 350-400 HP of Model 3 LR.

  • @FORDschritt
    @FORDschritt Год назад +3

    As much as i like this car, the price is a bad joke

  • @erebostd
    @erebostd Год назад +12

    What a car 😍. Who want a sh#tty tesla when you can have THIS?

    • @RobertPuklin
      @RobertPuklin Год назад +2

      you realize EQE AMG costs as much as a Model S Plaid? Also, not many are cross shopping between Mercedes and Tesla.

    • @clevernduruza8624
      @clevernduruza8624 Год назад

      At some point you'll realise that charging is more important than the car itself.

    • @robertsarkezi2080
      @robertsarkezi2080 Год назад +1

      Hmm, you get 2!! M3P for the monies of this.

    • @nielsvandenkieboom5034
      @nielsvandenkieboom5034 Год назад

      Well because Tesla is much cheaper to get and cheaper to drive as they’re more efficient. I wouldn’t trade in my Model 3 RWD for this Mercedes🤷‍♂️

    • @erebostd
      @erebostd Год назад

      @@nielsvandenkieboom5034 nobody asked you, or did i iverlook that? Many people buy toyotas and Mitsubishis and are absolutely fine with them. Tesla was a bit like apple in the early days of the EV, the car to have. But with their ongoing quality problems in hardware and software, and THESE options out there tesla‘s getting more and more pushed aside..

  • @willyvanroy3534
    @willyvanroy3534 Год назад

    Yeah if the 4matic doesn’t fail

  • @MG-eg3nh
    @MG-eg3nh Год назад

    Not the germans invented the so called Autobahn. It came first from Italy. Kind regards from Germany 😉

  • @sk.43821
    @sk.43821 Год назад

    What happened to the PORSCHE pronunciation?
    😀✌🇩🇪

  • @mrrkrr
    @mrrkrr Год назад

    460kW on a 350v battery is insane... that's over 1300 Amps!!! Model S Plaid has to use a pyrofuse to get currents that high.

  • @KM-st7zh
    @KM-st7zh Год назад

    EQE=EQ GLE ?More like EQ GLE!

  • @louis-michelfurnemont9481
    @louis-michelfurnemont9481 Год назад +3

    Aren’t there cars more affordable and less powerful to test,for normal people?

    • @iamalittlepepper
      @iamalittlepepper Год назад +1

      It probably comes down to what is available in the press pool for Bjorn. and it comes down to profit margins for the manufacturers. Higher end models just rake it more money per unit, which is important to the makers since the supply is constrained.

    • @bjornnyland
      @bjornnyland  Год назад +14

      Watch range test of EQE 300 (RWD) coming next week.

    • @John_S_NL
      @John_S_NL Год назад

      I really want to see the MG4. That could be my next car after the Citigo e iV.

    • @Bud_Terence
      @Bud_Terence Год назад

      @Louis-Michel Furnémont I guess, Bjorn will test MG4 soon. So he can satisfy lower income needs as well.

    • @furorentonori5838
      @furorentonori5838 Год назад +1

      @@John_S_NL don’t buy chinese car
      Not reliable and cheap construction

  • @ruimpinho
    @ruimpinho Год назад +3

    The design is so damn weird.

    • @henrik1743
      @henrik1743 Год назад +1

      Weird? It's ugly and severly overpriced