Oh my gosh. I just checked out your channel and you might be more vampire chicken than the vampire chicken himself. Loved your zombie king gambit. Genius!!
@@colegieseking5136 haha well, actually I only got into gambits after seeing Jonathan's video on Nakhmanson gambit so one could argue I'm an vampire egg 😂
Lichess Stockfish level 8 is not a real Stockfish, not even close. It makes poor moves from time to time, even blunders. One time it even blundered me a whole piece, then of course started playing well again but all was lost. So attempting to win in any way Stockfish cloud based, be that 15 or even 12 - not possible for a human.
It was really funny yes, I literally beat stockfish 14 when stockfish literally gave me a whole rook with no compensation. I was astonished and looked at my board trying to find a string attached. Oh and I'm 800
This wasn't a "supremely logical entitiy", Lichess' version of Stockfish is old, trimmed down and even blunders on purpose occasionally. Try this with a real Stockfish, even outdated versions and you'll get crushed.
Please stop calling those castrated and neutered online "Stockfishs" Stockfish. Use some GUI and a stockfish 15 running on your local machine and try to replicate, on the odd chance, you do not expect it to be a major difference.
@@Celatra The lichess level 8 stockfish is not stockfish 8. It is stockfish 14 as a base but tuned to be much weaker. It's much closer to super gm strength than actual stockfish which is 700-800 points stronger.
Now I want to see two drunk chess masters facing each other playing ridiculous traps like that and they just keep trying to one up each other until someone takes a piece
It's amazing how you can trick stockfish. It's only like 10 moves and at a depth of 18+ the engine should see this right? But I guess because brute force is too much to calculate stockfish doesn't look at lines like this because it's up 7 points of material and thinks: this must be good for me, I won't calculate more in this line. At least I have no other explanation why it would get mated when being up a piece in the opening.
The number of possible positions gets exponentially larger the more depth you add. As such, computers use some ways of scoring different moves from a given position so they can then explore what it thinks are the better moves. They will assume the opponent is playing optimally, so will typically choose the best moves that the opponent can make on the opponents turns. One of the common ways of scoring a move is by the number of points gained/lost in that move, which is typically by taking a piece. Therefore, these moves that sacrifice a lot of piece count for later gains and traps mean that the chess engine is unlikely to have explored those moves as it does not expect the opponent to be playing them, and is thus less likely to see the trap until it is too late. The neural network (NN) based engines (Alpha Go, Leela, etc.) don't have a built-in scoring mechanism. Instead, they work by playing a lot of games against themselves, then re-enforcing winning moves and the opposite for losing moves. Here the idea is for the neural network to determine how to evaluate the games on its own and find the patterns that work the best. This will automatically factor in material count, because if you lose a lot of pieces you are more likely to lose, but the networks learn other strategies and assessments for which moves are good/bad. I don't know if this is the version of stockfish that includes NN as part of its evaluation or not. It would be intersting to play this against the different engines to see how they compare.
stockfish play instantly, maybe a maximum of 2 seconds of thinking. As if the engine has unlimited time to calculate, the developers choose this way. I think if you give stockfish way more time, no player in this world has any chance to beat it.
The machine learning methods through which Stockfish becomes the best at chess rely on it learning from millions of games in the database but if these games aren't there, Stockfish won't know what to do; I imagine a brute force chess engine will not fall for these tricks but can't say for sure.
Bad heuristics they still use concepts about material worth etc in pruning the search tree. NN is even worse as it's purely statistical accuracy, it won't ever be 100%. And if the stockfish developers see these specific cases, they can adjust the heuristics or NN training slightly to make sure it doesn't miss this again. The heuristics are quite good now, nothing like queen is 9, rook is 5, etc. They have concepts of bishop pair, knight outposts, passed pawns, zigzwang, etc in the quick heuristics to calculate a score in a given position. It's so good that even lines like this are very hard to find and becoming almost impossible to find soon at least without machine assistance.
This one is great. Easy to understand at the human level, but it seems like the logical thing to do for white is to keep falling for the traps until it’s too late. Will add this to my opening repertoire.
Engines behave in such strange ways. Stockfish evaluates the game somewhere between better for white and a draw for most of the line. But it believes the position as late as move 18 is completely winning for white. After 18. a4!, black has no good move. The idea of 19. Ra3 is unstoppable, and allows Rg3 defending the mating attack in the game. Crazy that stockfish plays the losing blunder 18. h3, which doesn't appear to address any of the threats on the board. When analyzing this with the low depth lichess engine, it believed for like half a second that h3 is a draw, then immediately realizes it's forced mate.
it's not sash, its shah, but the second h is really soft spoken like whispered but not whispered, its like when you breathe out without speaking almost
As a first time viewer of the channel and someone who has only recently started to play chess and consume chess content, I think the video premise and the backstory and explanation was great and I would definitely come back to see more, except for the ending; you go from move 17 to 22 and checkmating in 30 seconds without explanation, and left me (to be fair a 900 rated newbie) scratching my head and needing to rewatch the last 30 seconds. In a slowly more saturated content market, if you were to slow down just a bit and spend an extra 30 seconds there explaining, I'm subscribed and watching frequently, hands down. Great video, and more constructive feedback than criticism! I still look forward to seeing more content from you!
If you look at the board, white can literally not move any piece except for pawns any knight move loses the knight, any rook move loses the rock, the bishops cannot move (one has no squares, the other is pinned to the king) and the queen is defending the pinned bishop, 1 move away from mate black has to keep the rook in front of the king to pin the bishop, and the queen has to threathen mate if white moves their queen the still living bishop is on that square to trick stockfish into attacking it, we dont care, as long as it gives our knight a square to land on later on with all that in mind, we have the option of going for a draw, which he mentions, or using our knight to try and get to the back rank and mate, since all whites pieces are on useless squares on the right side of the board anything else just gives stockfish tempo and loses the game since we are down on material with no attack or tricks these videos are not supposed to be educational or puzzles, its just a showcase of a very niche line youll never play, so you only have to follow the moves and enjoy the show, id recommend watching a few opening videos if you want to improve your rating and develop more understanding of the early to mid game, where most of the gambits happen, then again, im a 2200 puzzle player, so maybe i just find it easier to see moves if i know theyre there
Why would (how could) Stockfish blunder after 17... Ng4 (a move played supposedly to confuse it) with 18. h3?? Nh2 and forced mate. Engines don't miss mates. Engines don't get confused.
@@AP-dc1ks Thank you. I surmised that Stockfish was somehow cut in strength, and I suppose that beating L8 (=Stockfish 8?) even on a slow server (?) is still quite some achievement.
@@brucelittleboy3594 The level 8 is just an extra setting of SF 14 that can makes SF discard the best move. SF 8 is the SF version from some years ago. Without that setting SF plays a4 and wins instead of the losing h3.
Finally found a chess player who tries crazy stuff never seen before. I try out there moves at amuch lower level probably. I don't play to win but to enjoy new experiences. All these memorised he'd ate so boring and dull. Bobby Fisher would probably get it.
6:07 Stockfish did not see mate in 6 moves? thats odd. I tried this position on my samsung tab on lichess settup. and my lichess does not want to play h3 (6:22) for white, instead he go a4 to open up for the rook to cover 3 rank i suppose. then knight Nxh2 dont work because of white play Ra3 and is ready to block queen infiltration: after Qg6, blocks with Rg3. dont really understand why your stockfish plays h3.. my emediately says a4. Perhaps your stockfish is more drunk than the bishop?? 😉 a human would perhaps play h3, dont know. looks like nobody on lichess ever got into that position.
Stockfish 15 after depth 20 says bishop to b4 is the only move after white knight at b5. And after that best move for white is pawn to c3, not knight c7. But really blunder is not here. It was before mate. Stockfish with depth 20 doesn't move pawn to h3, it moves pawn at a4, and now black completely lose.
I have come here to suggest complete garbage! Gunderam Gambit! 1e4 e5 2Nf3 c6!! I've personally explored it quite a bit for ~1700 elo play but I wonder if there is a way to play it so aggressively that stockfish doesn't understand it
Alright so I had my friend Joe take your spot for the rest of this game here. I'm sure your next move would be Re8+ putting my King in ✅. So I'm gonna take a little gamble here & play Kf1. I told my friend Joe to play vengefully here for your black pieces- because I'm sure you'd be upset I put your drunken Bishop's in lookup for disorderly conduct. 😅✌️ I'm kidding. I told Joe to simply play like he was a grandmaster - A game it!! 😅.. So Joe played the move Qf1. I defended this move with Rg1. Joe played Re1+ gave me the sh*t sandwich combo I've been dreading. I played Kxe1 - he played Qxg1+. Holding my breath I played Ke2. Joe played Qh1. I played c3 developing & adding another defender. Joe plays Kb8. Joe symbol is 🖤 representing black. And I'm 🐠 representing Stock 🐠 in white. And the rest of the moves are as follows. 11. 🐠 b5. -- 🖤Qh+5. 12.🐠 f3. -- 🖤Kd5. 13.🐠 Qe4. -- 🖤Nce7. 14. 🐠 c4 -- 🖤Qh2+. 15.🐠 Kd3. -- 🖤Nf4+. 16.🐠 Kc2. -- 🖤 Nfg6. 17. 🐠 b2. -- 🖤 a6. And here's where I play my version of the Drunken Bishop I called the plastered Rook Forcefed Q👑 sacrifice- who's been at the bar for to long about to vertently help my Queen & Knight ✅ mate your drunken Bishop plan back to where it came from- B😅OM!🍌 18. 🐠 Rxa6. -- 🖤 bxa6. 19.🐠 Nc7 -- 🖤 Qxc7. And your last bastion of Hope- your Q is a goner. 😎. Forced sacrifice no thanks a lot to my drunken Rook. 20.🐠 bxc7+ -- 🖤 Kxc7. 21. 🐠 21.d4 -- 🖤 Nc6. 22. 🐠 Bf4+ -- 🖤 Kn6. 23. 🐠 C5+ -- 🖤 Kb7. 24.🐠 d5 -- 🖤 Nce5. 25. 🐠 c6+ -- 🖤 Nxc6. 26. 🐠 dxc6+ -- 🖤 Kb6. 27. 🐠 Qd4+ -- & this is where Joe Resigned. So I took his place until ✅ mate. 🖤 Kxc6. 28. 🐠 Qd6+. --. 🖤 Kb5. 29.🐠 Be3. -- 🖤 a5. 30. 🐠 Qbc+. -- 🖤 Ka4. 31. 🐠 Qb3# I believe that's ✅ mate to your Drunken Bishop gambit J- no thanks to my drunken Rook Forcefed Gambit. So I guess it's back to the drawing board for you - let your Bishop dry out a bit huh😊. Hope your Bishops have fun in rehab 😎🎈. Obt way your welcome 😉.
Ok so we could simply exchange Q👑s. Fast forward ahead - u put my Queen in check ✅ with your Knight. I take you're Q👑 with my Rook- the u take mine with your knight. Life goes on. However I'm thinking seeing as you're low on material & you Q👑 appears to already be in a fairly strong position. I'm 90% positive you're not going for the Q👑 trade off at this juncture correct? So as follows Qxh2. & my move Qd3+. You're King is now in ✅ 😎 You're up next J-😉
Ok so I'm thinking now that have my Rook on f3 between your Q👑 & Bishop. The best move that I can come up with for U is Bxe2. moving your Q👑 to e6 wouldn't make a lot of sense at this point because I would just capture your Bishop on f3 with my Rook..Ect- ect no matter how U play that one out it leads to a sh*tty position for you. Obviously if you attempt to capture my Rook with your Q👑 I just take your Rook with one of my Pawns. And any move u make with one of your knights or Rook would just simply lead to the lose of your Q👑. So I think the best move you have is as I already stated: Bxe2. In which I take back Qxe2. Ok sofar your drunken Bishop ideas seem tobe sobering up a bit here. & from calculations- although you can check on Stock 🐠 for salvation if you wish- you're going to need a new game in Order to defeat me. You're up next Jman- 😎✅
stockfish level 8 loses to 1 sec stockfish on my computer (which is just a normal PC). This is impressive still but the moves that you are playing are a different level, pre-analysed. you might be able to defeat carlsen this way if you find a variation he will fall into
I know you're saying that - " Stock🐠 only has one good move here, that being c3 the feed is a little after 5:00. Now I'm only rated a 1776 but I respectfully disagree that that's the only best move stock🐠 c3 that could have made by stock🐠? So I'm curious what would you do if Stock🐠 went say a3 instead? What would be your next move then?
Okay so I'm thinking after I moved my pawn to a3. You're still going to take my knight with you're Bishop on f3 correct? Because that was high on your list of necessities. So instead of taking you're Bishop on b4 I'm going with Rg3. You're up next John. 😎
So many nondescript chess players selling their souls to the lure of page views and ad revenue in the brutally competitive attempt to get noticed over much stronger players. So many people worshiping these chess playing engines rather than learning how to play chess.
Entertaining video, but I don't like the misleading title. Clearly tries to make the viewer think he "beat stockfish" when in reality it was a lower level version of it making stupid blunders.
I've watched you before from st. Louis something chess and you weren't as entertaining today. I'm glad to see that you're content are actually great. Good pacing, nice explanation, and hyped up. I'm a big fan of eric rosen and gotham chess so you got great competitors out there but I think you're heading to the right direction I'm basically saying that imma subscribe💯
![FendiDa Rappa - Clock Dat ft. Shamar Marco [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3NBU8KHdxYY/mqdefault.jpg)
Great, now I have to rework my Lichess study... Haha, thanks man for sharing, you're the best!
Oh my gosh. I just checked out your channel and you might be more vampire chicken than the vampire chicken himself. Loved your zombie king gambit. Genius!!
@@colegieseking5136 haha well, actually I only got into gambits after seeing Jonathan's video on Nakhmanson gambit so one could argue I'm an vampire egg 😂
Hey I was playing normal chess but I accidentally used drunken bishop gambit so I won.
hmm, you get to 1640 subscriptions in 9 days
Thats really impressive
@@constantinusrahl4246 it's a dream coming true for me ☺️
there is an alternate universe where he didn't retract Qg2 in time
Would've been the most irritating retake of all time😂
Actual Factual
These engines tricking attempts videos are always great! Refreshing and relaxing unlike the stressful side of chess
Lichess Stockfish level 8 is not a real Stockfish, not even close. It makes poor moves from time to time, even blunders. One time it even blundered me a whole piece, then of course started playing well again but all was lost. So attempting to win in any way Stockfish cloud based, be that 15 or even 12 - not possible for a human.
Think this is content side of chess not highly analytical antifun side, just appreciate the content
It was really funny yes, I literally beat stockfish 14 when stockfish literally gave me a whole rook with no compensation. I was astonished and looked at my board trying to find a string attached. Oh and I'm 800
@@ilkkamiinalainen7116 ok
@@Andres.Duran.J da
@@plasma4128 Bruh. it's a cool gambit but he didn't beat stockfish so it's not impressive.
*May the Drunken Bishops be remembered throughout time.*
*How do you defeat a supremely logical entity? WITH NONSENSE.*
Very well put!
This wasn't a "supremely logical entitiy", Lichess' version of Stockfish is old, trimmed down and even blunders on purpose occasionally. Try this with a real Stockfish, even outdated versions and you'll get crushed.
This is awesome, mate!
I'm not a bishop, but i'm drunk, so it's like half my gambit! I liked it and i've subscribed. Cheers!
But the real Stockfish is stronger
Well if Stockfish 15 at 40+ depth every move Its just winning
This was outrageously entertaining yet educational at the same time.
Don't try this against real SF on your 8-core Laptop and not the WebAssembly / JavaScript whatever SF inside your browser.
I will NOT subscribe to your channel. Because I am already subscribed. This entire comment is pointless filler for the youtube algorithm.
Please stop calling those castrated and neutered online "Stockfishs" Stockfish. Use some GUI and a stockfish 15 running on your local machine and try to replicate, on the odd chance, you do not expect it to be a major difference.
Yeah righto buddy can you read, it says stockfish..
this is stockfish 8, and stockfish 8 is rated 3370. weaker than 15's rating of 3800 but still.
@@Celatra The lichess level 8 stockfish is not stockfish 8. It is stockfish 14 as a base but tuned to be much weaker. It's much closer to super gm strength than actual stockfish which is 700-800 points stronger.
@@Celatra My opinion is, that if you had a stockfish 8 on your machine instead of on some web site, it would still give better results.
@@ruffianeo3418 not necessarily, esp not if my pc was not powerful enough to utilize all of stockfish
Now I want to see two drunk chess masters facing each other playing ridiculous traps like that and they just keep trying to one up each other until someone takes a piece
It's amazing how you can trick stockfish. It's only like 10 moves and at a depth of 18+ the engine should see this right? But I guess because brute force is too much to calculate stockfish doesn't look at lines like this because it's up 7 points of material and thinks: this must be good for me, I won't calculate more in this line.
At least I have no other explanation why it would get mated when being up a piece in the opening.
The number of possible positions gets exponentially larger the more depth you add. As such, computers use some ways of scoring different moves from a given position so they can then explore what it thinks are the better moves. They will assume the opponent is playing optimally, so will typically choose the best moves that the opponent can make on the opponents turns. One of the common ways of scoring a move is by the number of points gained/lost in that move, which is typically by taking a piece. Therefore, these moves that sacrifice a lot of piece count for later gains and traps mean that the chess engine is unlikely to have explored those moves as it does not expect the opponent to be playing them, and is thus less likely to see the trap until it is too late.
The neural network (NN) based engines (Alpha Go, Leela, etc.) don't have a built-in scoring mechanism. Instead, they work by playing a lot of games against themselves, then re-enforcing winning moves and the opposite for losing moves. Here the idea is for the neural network to determine how to evaluate the games on its own and find the patterns that work the best. This will automatically factor in material count, because if you lose a lot of pieces you are more likely to lose, but the networks learn other strategies and assessments for which moves are good/bad.
I don't know if this is the version of stockfish that includes NN as part of its evaluation or not. It would be intersting to play this against the different engines to see how they compare.
stockfish play instantly, maybe a maximum of 2 seconds of thinking. As if the engine has unlimited time to calculate, the developers choose this way. I think if you give stockfish way more time, no player in this world has any chance to beat it.
Hardware, browser engine, very little analysis time.
The machine learning methods through which Stockfish becomes the best at chess rely on it learning from millions of games in the database but if these games aren't there, Stockfish won't know what to do; I imagine a brute force chess engine will not fall for these tricks but can't say for sure.
Bad heuristics they still use concepts about material worth etc in pruning the search tree. NN is even worse as it's purely statistical accuracy, it won't ever be 100%. And if the stockfish developers see these specific cases, they can adjust the heuristics or NN training slightly to make sure it doesn't miss this again. The heuristics are quite good now, nothing like queen is 9, rook is 5, etc. They have concepts of bishop pair, knight outposts, passed pawns, zigzwang, etc in the quick heuristics to calculate a score in a given position. It's so good that even lines like this are very hard to find and becoming almost impossible to find soon at least without machine assistance.
Are we returning to romanticism? Do to bots being much better than humans at it are humans just done with modernism?
Why don't you try this against SF 15 on a normal PC?? 🤔
This is a joke, right?!
Did this actually happen??
Oh my god. What a gambit. Insane game!
My brain wrinkled along the 4th dimension
This one is great. Easy to understand at the human level, but it seems like the logical thing to do for white is to keep falling for the traps until it’s too late. Will add this to my opening repertoire.
-I went ahead in time to find futures where we beat stockfish
-How many did you see?
-14.000.605
-How many do we win?
-1
omg!!! it's just like marvel!!!
Haven't watched the video yet.
But the thumbnail looks like my Legendary "e4, Bishop a6, King e2" opening.
Instead of the computer moving h3 pawn to attack the horse, lichess says that a4 is just winning for white. Is there a move against a4 ?
Engines behave in such strange ways.
Stockfish evaluates the game somewhere between better for white and a draw for most of the line. But it believes the position as late as move 18 is completely winning for white. After 18. a4!, black has no good move. The idea of 19. Ra3 is unstoppable, and allows Rg3 defending the mating attack in the game.
Crazy that stockfish plays the losing blunder 18. h3, which doesn't appear to address any of the threats on the board. When analyzing this with the low depth lichess engine, it believed for like half a second that h3 is a draw, then immediately realizes it's forced mate.
It plays it because it is heavily handicapped so humans can beat it
It's not stockfish it's stockfish level 8, it blunders on purpose
Me learning Sicilian defence
Random yt recommad : drunken bishop it is
it's not sash, its shah, but the second h is really soft spoken like whispered but not whispered, its like when you breathe out without speaking almost
But, the computer never moves it’s knight back?
As a first time viewer of the channel and someone who has only recently started to play chess and consume chess content, I think the video premise and the backstory and explanation was great and I would definitely come back to see more, except for the ending; you go from move 17 to 22 and checkmating in 30 seconds without explanation, and left me (to be fair a 900 rated newbie) scratching my head and needing to rewatch the last 30 seconds. In a slowly more saturated content market, if you were to slow down just a bit and spend an extra 30 seconds there explaining, I'm subscribed and watching frequently, hands down. Great video, and more constructive feedback than criticism! I still look forward to seeing more content from you!
If you look at the board, white can literally not move any piece except for pawns
any knight move loses the knight, any rook move loses the rock, the bishops cannot move (one has no squares, the other is pinned to the king) and the queen is defending the pinned bishop, 1 move away from mate
black has to keep the rook in front of the king to pin the bishop, and the queen has to threathen mate if white moves their queen
the still living bishop is on that square to trick stockfish into attacking it, we dont care, as long as it gives our knight a square to land on later on
with all that in mind, we have the option of going for a draw, which he mentions, or using our knight to try and get to the back rank and mate, since all whites pieces are on useless squares on the right side of the board
anything else just gives stockfish tempo and loses the game since we are down on material with no attack or tricks
these videos are not supposed to be educational or puzzles, its just a showcase of a very niche line youll never play, so you only have to follow the moves and enjoy the show, id recommend watching a few opening videos if you want to improve your rating and develop more understanding of the early to mid game, where most of the gambits happen, then again, im a 2200 puzzle player, so maybe i just find it easier to see moves if i know theyre there
Why would (how could) Stockfish blunder after 17... Ng4 (a move played supposedly to confuse it) with 18. h3?? Nh2 and forced mate. Engines don't miss mates. Engines don't get confused.
Level 8 is programmed to not always play the best move.
@@AP-dc1ks Thank you. I surmised that Stockfish was somehow cut in strength, and I suppose that beating L8 (=Stockfish 8?) even on a slow server (?) is still quite some achievement.
@@brucelittleboy3594 The level 8 is just an extra setting of SF 14 that can makes SF discard the best move. SF 8 is the SF version from some years ago. Without that setting SF plays a4 and wins instead of the losing h3.
@@AP-dc1ks Thanks again!
Jonathan, can I send you a game that I drew with Stockfish 10? It involves a potential queen sacrifice too with blocked position. IT were lovely.
Send it, or upload it yourself
Finally found a chess player who tries crazy stuff never seen before.
I try out there moves at amuch lower level probably. I don't play to win but to enjoy new experiences. All these memorised he'd ate so boring and dull.
Bobby Fisher would probably get it.
bishop recapturing bishop, top engine move? Nah, how about rook to g6 instead? blah
Great video as always. You have the most underrated channel on this website
I guess Stockfish thinks a human wouldn't be silly enough to sacrifice so many pieces for a long distance attack.
I will NOT subscribe to your channel. Because I am already subscribed. This entire comment is pointless filler for the youtube algorithm.
I, too, am engaging with this content.
Impression
Maybe Magnus should learn this Gambit so he can beat Hans next time
Woah. That's interesting and impressive work!
he cant keep getting away with this
6:07 Stockfish did not see mate in 6 moves? thats odd.
I tried this position on my samsung tab on lichess settup. and my lichess does not want to play h3 (6:22) for white, instead he go a4 to open up for the rook to cover 3 rank i suppose. then knight Nxh2 dont work because of white play Ra3 and is ready to block queen infiltration: after Qg6, blocks with Rg3.
dont really understand why your stockfish plays h3.. my emediately says a4. Perhaps your stockfish is more drunk than the bishop?? 😉
a human would perhaps play h3, dont know. looks like nobody on lichess ever got into that position.
Because those levels are custom. Level 8 is not Stockfish at max strength, it's limited so humans can win against it.
Very nice, except that stockfish played 8.c3 (not even 'considering' the poor move 8.Nxc7) in my games
Stockfish 15 after depth 20 says bishop to b4 is the only move after white knight at b5. And after that best move for white is pawn to c3, not knight c7. But really blunder is not here. It was before mate. Stockfish with depth 20 doesn't move pawn to h3, it moves pawn at a4, and now black completely lose.
What other gambits should I try to beat Stockfish with?
Duras! 1e4 f5
Mosquito Gambit, I don't think machines will consider insects healthy
Danish evans smith morra please😀
Wing gambit
I have come here to suggest complete garbage! Gunderam Gambit! 1e4 e5 2Nf3 c6!! I've personally explored it quite a bit for ~1700 elo play but I wonder if there is a way to play it so aggressively that stockfish doesn't understand it
Alright so I had my friend Joe take your spot for the rest of this game here.
I'm sure your next move would be Re8+ putting my King in ✅. So I'm gonna take a little gamble here & play Kf1.
I told my friend Joe to play vengefully here for your black pieces- because I'm sure you'd be upset I put your drunken Bishop's in lookup for disorderly conduct. 😅✌️ I'm kidding. I told Joe to simply play like he was a grandmaster - A game it!! 😅..
So Joe played the move Qf1. I defended this move with Rg1. Joe played Re1+ gave me the sh*t sandwich combo I've been dreading. I played Kxe1 - he played Qxg1+. Holding my breath I played Ke2.
Joe played Qh1. I played c3 developing & adding another defender.
Joe plays Kb8. Joe symbol is 🖤 representing black. And I'm 🐠 representing Stock 🐠 in white. And the rest of the moves are as follows.
11. 🐠 b5. -- 🖤Qh+5.
12.🐠 f3. -- 🖤Kd5.
13.🐠 Qe4. -- 🖤Nce7.
14. 🐠 c4 -- 🖤Qh2+.
15.🐠 Kd3. -- 🖤Nf4+.
16.🐠 Kc2. -- 🖤 Nfg6.
17. 🐠 b2. -- 🖤 a6.
And here's where I play my version of the Drunken Bishop I called the plastered Rook Forcefed Q👑 sacrifice- who's been at the bar for to long about to vertently help my Queen & Knight ✅ mate your drunken Bishop plan back to where it came from- B😅OM!🍌
18. 🐠 Rxa6. -- 🖤 bxa6.
19.🐠 Nc7 -- 🖤 Qxc7.
And your last bastion of Hope- your Q is a goner. 😎. Forced sacrifice no thanks a lot to my drunken Rook.
20.🐠 bxc7+ -- 🖤 Kxc7.
21. 🐠 21.d4 -- 🖤 Nc6.
22. 🐠 Bf4+ -- 🖤 Kn6.
23. 🐠 C5+ -- 🖤 Kb7.
24.🐠 d5 -- 🖤 Nce5.
25. 🐠 c6+ -- 🖤 Nxc6.
26. 🐠 dxc6+ -- 🖤 Kb6.
27. 🐠 Qd4+ -- & this is where Joe Resigned. So I took his place until ✅ mate. 🖤 Kxc6.
28. 🐠 Qd6+. --. 🖤 Kb5.
29.🐠 Be3. -- 🖤 a5.
30. 🐠 Qbc+. -- 🖤 Ka4.
31. 🐠 Qb3# I believe that's ✅ mate to your Drunken Bishop gambit J- no thanks to my drunken Rook Forcefed Gambit. So I guess it's back to the drawing board for you - let your Bishop dry out a bit huh😊.
Hope your Bishops have fun in rehab 😎🎈. Obt way your welcome 😉.
Ok so we could simply exchange Q👑s. Fast forward ahead - u put my Queen in check ✅ with your Knight. I take you're Q👑 with my Rook- the u take mine with your knight. Life goes on. However I'm thinking seeing as you're low on material & you Q👑 appears to already be in a fairly strong position. I'm 90% positive you're not going for the Q👑 trade off at this juncture correct?
So as follows Qxh2. & my move Qd3+. You're King is now in ✅ 😎
You're up next J-😉
Ok so I'm thinking now that have my Rook on f3 between your Q👑 & Bishop. The best move that I can come up with for U is Bxe2. moving your Q👑 to e6 wouldn't make a lot of sense at this point because I would just capture your Bishop on f3 with my Rook..Ect- ect no matter how U play that one out it leads to a sh*tty position for you.
Obviously if you attempt to capture my Rook with your Q👑 I just take your Rook with one of my Pawns. And any move u make with one of your knights or Rook would just simply lead to the lose of your Q👑.
So I think the best move you have is as I already stated: Bxe2. In which I take back Qxe2. Ok sofar your drunken Bishop ideas seem tobe sobering up a bit here. & from calculations- although you can check on Stock 🐠 for salvation if you wish- you're going to need a new game in Order to defeat me. You're up next Jman- 😎✅
stockfish level 8 loses to 1 sec stockfish on my computer (which is just a normal PC).
This is impressive still but the moves that you are playing are a different level, pre-analysed.
you might be able to defeat carlsen this way if you find a variation he will fall into
I know you're saying that - " Stock🐠 only has one good move here, that being c3 the feed is a little after 5:00.
Now I'm only rated a 1776 but I respectfully disagree that that's the only best move stock🐠 c3 that could have made by stock🐠?
So I'm curious what would you do if Stock🐠 went say a3 instead? What would be your next move then?
Okay so I'm thinking after I moved my pawn to a3. You're still going to take my knight with you're Bishop on f3 correct? Because that was high on your list of necessities.
So instead of taking you're Bishop on b4 I'm going with Rg3. You're up next John. 😎
So many nondescript chess players selling their souls to the lure of page views and ad revenue in the brutally competitive attempt to get noticed over much stronger players. So many people worshiping these chess playing engines rather than learning how to play chess.
Perhaps "Adamisko šach" would like you to say his name a bit better. "šach" is the word for "chess" in Czech and Slovak, and is pronounced "shakh".
Stockfish doesn't take the a8 rook, he plays c3 instead
wow... that was impressive... glad i found you, big rosen fan so you know i like this stuff. Thanks for sharing... subscribe!
5:47 why not give a check from Nf3 instead?? You'd still win the rook, but then you'd have a diagonal path to the back rank with ++!
Entertaining video, but I don't like the misleading title. Clearly tries to make the viewer think he "beat stockfish" when in reality it was a lower level version of it making stupid blunders.
Great job promoting the small channels Jonathan!
instead of h3 ..stock fish can hold the game in his favor by playing a4 and Ra4....please cover that in your analysis..
Chalk one up for us mere mortals.. proves these advanced chess engines aren't completely unbeatable.. and do have their blind spots still.
I’m starting to practice saying BOOM BOOM ( with vigour) to see if it Improves my game.
why queen takes rook d7? Isn't better to play queen takes h7 or queen to g7?
That's called a drunken bishop?
I just did that on a real board a year ago with a friend of mine😅
How 😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮 beating stockfish like dat is like stockfish playing against alpha
Amazingly, 18. a4 and white can stop the checkmate with the rook.
I love you
d4 just makes this idea invalid and stockfish 15 saw it
I've watched you before from st. Louis something chess and you weren't as entertaining today. I'm glad to see that you're content are actually great. Good pacing, nice explanation, and hyped up.
I'm a big fan of eric rosen and gotham chess so you got great competitors out there but I think you're heading to the right direction
I'm basically saying that imma subscribe💯
too bad it doesnt work on the newer versions of stockfish haha i challenge u to do it on stockfish 15
jajajajaja i enjoyed those tricky gambits you played against stockfish!!. Cheers from Chile!
How about d4 support to white knight
That gambit does not work at all
if you solved chess, what would your rating be?
Can't be more rare than a gambit never be played before.
Init m8
Why not 15KF3+ ? it seems like force in 3 moves
its similar play I made a while back but i named it crazy ivan.
Nice prep Adamsco
I lazily beat stockfish being 1300
I dont like chess because I dont like making assumptions
what if the rook goes to g3 instead of bishop recapturing on f3
you're right!
I don't know what to think anymore after watching this video. Are the engines smart or dumb xd ?
He's using a low depth stockfish, if you use the latest one, the man will straight up get smoked. Try for urself if you want. 😌
I keep expecting you to actually play a game against SF where you actually hold true to the title...
Why did you move rook instead of castling
What the HELL????
wtf happened in the last 20 seconds xD GG ma man haha
And then he sacrifices THE BIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIISHOP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Tray that with human and ther its no wey this can hapend!!
Bro playing the version of Stockfish that's from Ohio😂
I'll definitely try this one
cool that you gave credit to that guy and promoted him. a lot of other yters would have just stolen it and pretended they found it
Ademsko "check", I believe
And then he sacrifices THE ROOOOOOOOOK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Gh3 and only...Ge2 With a threat 0-0
Why my stockfich 8 on lichess plays not Kc7 after Kh2 but f3 and after Qg6 simply Kf2 and there is no mate?
5:10 move 13 what happens if Rg3?
Fairy stockfish is kinda drunk stockfish
This guy loves chess.
this vid, is exactly why you are my favourite youtuber. 😍
You sound just like Gotham chess
He did it, he beat the man who beat magnus
bro is rated 3900
Me 1000 rated player would of gave up my queen if I saw this different story with humans many stupid many smart machine only does one job lol
This is the definition of anarchy chess
I couldn't recreate this.
Edit: After a few more attempts it worked. Thanks
Crazy genius steel nerves chess.