The problem I still have with this explanation is that, the Bible and the New Testament describes that there is neither Jew nor Greek. Therefore, there is no longer a separation, and I believe there was never a separation, even in the old testament between those who truly believed and had faith and trust in Jesus Christ. The Bible says, that they will be drafted back in to the vine. The vine is not a Jew, the vine is Jesus Christ. How can a vine have different branches if it is not of the same vine? I believe Israel has a place but, it is a long side and not separated from those who believed in Jesus Christ, and along with that belief received the promises. The Bible says, that just because you are a Jew by birth does not mean that you are a Jew by the circumcision of the heart.
❤ Was a member at JMAC’s church and worked security. Dispensationalism is poison. MacArthur is still confused. Here is some helpful truth about Israel: ruclips.net/video/zN5lvSoICOI/видео.html
💯💯💯 In this video Dr. MacArthur says the church could not fulfill the promises to Israel. True. Jesus Christ fulfilled the promises to Israel. Ps 24 makes it clear, This is Jacob, the Generation that seeks the Face of God. Jesus is the better Jacob, and we follow Him.
@@embuchanyes sir, Jesus is the true Son, Jesus is the real templs that the nations now look to and through him they can be blessed, Jesus is not just a king,prophet and priest. He is more than that. Amen to your comment
You stated, "How can a vine have different branches if it is not of the same vine?" I'm assuming that you're ignoring what is in the text 11:17-21 because the answer is in the text. There are BOTH natural branches and WILD branches. A "wild olive" cannot not become a "natural olive" just because of grafting, it maintains its "wild" nature even though it is nourished by the "natural" branch. Both "natural" and "wild" are BOTH holy. And there are dire consequences if the "wild" boasts against the "natural". And while we're on the subject, you might want to revisit your "... there is neither Jew nor Greek" statement because you have left off parts of the text. Are you a man or a woman? Are you bond or free? Those are part of Galatians 3:28-29 as well. I don't think you're grasping the depth of what's going on.
Who is now the King of Israel in John 1:49? Is the King of Israel now the Head of the Church, and are we His Body? Why did God allow the Romans to destroy the Old Covenant temple and the Old Covenant city, about 40 years after His Son fulfilled the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34 in blood at Calvary? Once a person comes to understand the New Covenant promised to Israel and Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-34, which is found fulfilled by Christ during the first century in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 10:16-18, and specifically applied to the Church in 2 Corinthians 3:6-8, and Hebrews 12:22-24, man-made Bible doctrines fall apart. Let us now learn to preach the whole Gospel until He comes back. The King of Israel is risen from the dead! (John 1:49, Acts 2:36) We are not come to Mount Sinai in Hebrews 12:18. We are come instead to the New Covenant church of Mount Zion and the blood in Hebrews 12:22-24. ================ Who is really teaching “Replacement Theology” ? (Did God fulfill His promises to the Jewish people at Calvary? Matthew 26:28, John 19:30) The advocates of modern Dispensational Theology often accuse others of promoting “Replacement Theology”, or some may even say “Antisemitism”. What does the Bible say about their accusations? 1. Who is replacing Christ as the seed of Abraham through which all the families of the Earth would be blessed in Genesis 12:3, with Abraham’s modern descendants? (See Paul’s interpretation in Galatians 3:8, 3:16.) 2. Who is replacing the one people of God in John 10:16, with two peoples of God ? 3. Who is replacing the one seed (Christ) in Galatians 3:16, with the many seeds? 4. Who is replacing the children of the promise in Romans 9:8, with the children of the flesh? 5. Who is replacing the faithful “remnant” of Israelites in Romans 11:1-5, with the Baal worshipers? 6. Who is replacing the word "so" in Romans 11:26, with the word "then"? 7. Who is attempting to replace the Church made up of all races of people, with one made up only of Gentiles? Why did Peter address the crowd as “all the house of Israel” in Acts 2:36, when about 3,000 Israelites accepted Christ on the Day of Pentecost? 8. Based on Hebrews 9:15, the New Covenant cannot be separated from the Messiah’s death. Is the covenant in Daniel 9:27 connected to the Messiah’s death in Daniel 9:26. Is the covenant with the “many” in Daniel 9:27 the same covenant with the “many” in Matthew 26:28? If it is, some have replaced the New Covenant in Daniel 9:27 with a future covenant made by an antichrist not found in Daniel chapter 9. (See the 1599 Geneva Bible used by the Pilgrims.) 9. Those promoting the Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology often accuse others of teaching “Replacement Theology”, but are they the masters of it? Are they promoting a form of Dual Covenant Theology based on race? (See “genealogies” in Titus 3:9) Is the most important genealogy in the Bible found in Matthew 1:1? Is God's Son the ultimate fulfillment of Israel? Why has the modern Church done a pitiful job of sharing the Gospel with modern Orthodox Jews? Why would someone tell them they are God's chosen people and then fail to share the Gospel with them? Who is the seed of the woman promised in Genesis 3:15? Who is the "son" in Psalm 2? Who is the "suffering servant" of Isaiah 53? Who would fulfill the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34? Who would fulfill the timeline of Daniel chapter 9 before the second temple was destroyed? Why have we not heard this simple Old Testament Gospel preached on Christian television in the United States on a regular basis? 10. Watch the RUclips video “Genesis of Dispensational Theology” to see the origin of this man-made doctrine, which is less than 200 years old. It was brought to the United States about the time of the Civil War by John Nelson Darby. The doctrine was later incorporated into the notes of the Scofield Reference Bible, and then spread through much of the modern Church. Dallas Theological Seminary in Dallas Texas was created in part to promote John Darby’s Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology. Lewis Sperry Chafer, the first president of Dallas Theological, had the following to say about the difference between Israel and the Church:
“The dispensationalist believes that throughout the ages God is pursuing two distinct purposes: one related to the earth with earthly people and earthly objectives involved which is Judaism; while the other is related to heaven with heavenly people and heavenly objectives involved, which is Christianity.” Lewis Sperry Chafer, Dispensationalism (Dallas, Seminary Press, 1936), p. 107. Chafer states that, ‘Israel is an eternal nation, heir to an eternal land, with an eternal kingdom, on which David rules from an eternal throne,’ that is, on earth and distinct from the church who will be in heaven.” Lewis Sperry Chafer. Systematic Theology. 1975. Vol. IV. pp. 315-323. John Walvoord, another prominent voice of Dallas Theological stated… "...it is an article of normative dispensational belief that the boundaries of the land promised to Abraham and his descendants from the Nile to the Euphrates will be literally instituted and that Jesus Christ will return to a literal and theocratic Jewish kingdom centred on a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem. In such a scheme the Church on earth is relegated to the status of a parenthesis.” John F. Walvoord, The Rapture Question.1979, p. 25 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Are there two peoples of God in John 10:16? (See also 1 John 2:22-23, 2 John 1:7-11.) What is the land promise to the Old Testament Saints in Hebrews 11:15-16? (See what Joshua said about the Old Covenant land promise in Josh. 21:43.) Based on 2 Peter 3:10-13, is this earth “eternal”? Will it be replaced by a new earth? Based on Acts 2:36, and Romans 9:6-8, and Romans 11:1-5, and Hebrews 12:22-24, and James 1:1-3, can faithful Israel and the Church be separated into two different groups? Who is the New Covenant promised to in Jeremiah 31:31-34, and is it fulfilled by the blood of Christ at Calvary in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 12:18-24? Will modern Orthodox Jews ever be saved outside of the New Covenant Church, if the New Covenant is “everlasting” in Hebrews 13:20? (See also 2 Thess. 1:7-10) If the New Covenant has made the Old Covenant “obsolete” in Hebrews 8:6-13, why would God go back to the Old Covenant system during a future time period? Read the recent book "The Rise and Fall of Dispensationalism", by Daniel G. Hummel.
In Ephesians 3 it LITERALLY says we are ONE BODY. This mystery is that through the gospel the Gentiles are heirs together with Israel, members together of one body, and sharers together in the promise in Christ Jesus.
Paul in Romans 9 speaks of the children of promise he says that spiritual Israel are not those that are Israel by birth but they are Israel through belief
A couple things -- dispensationalism didn't exist in the days of Martin Luther. Also, Martin Luther did not "move" God's plan of salvation. The Reformers simply rejected the doctrines of "cooperation with grace" and believed salvation was as defined biblically - by grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone, based on Scripture alone, for the glory of God alone. Acts 2:38 records the first instruction given as to the biblical response to grace, that being repentance and baptism. Hope this helps.
I like how he says that the beatings and curses are for Israel literally but when it comes to the blesssings then we say that’s that’s for the church. For example the new hearth, but I have heard him preach on Jhon 3 and say to the audience that if you’re not born again, if you don’t have a change of hearth then you can not enter the kingdom. So now he gets to misinterpret and apply the passage how he wants hmmmmm
Worst thing said here was that quote from Dr. Feinberg (spelling?). He said, "....but the Gentile church gets all the blessing." Ummmmmmmmm there's no such thing as a "the Gentile church"......... There's the church, which is for everyone, as evidenced by, say, the fact that 100% of the Apostles of the church were full blown Jews? By sayyyyyy Jesus commanding to take the gospel to "JUDEA, Samaria, and the ends of the earth." What the heck are we even talking about "Gentile church" vs Jews? What is going on?
What's going on is that scholars recognize what went on in Acts 15 and it's not proper to compel Gentiles to become Judaized. Dr. Charles F. Feinberg is a converted Jew by the way and a Pre-Millennial one at that. I have a few of his books.
There is no earthly promise left to be fulfilled for national Israel. All earthly promise God gave to them fulfilled when God brought them out of Egypt and gave them the land of Palestine. All subsequent promises are spiritual promises which fulfilled in Christ in the New Covenant. Now there is only one Body (Eph. 3:5; 4:4), comprise of Jews and Gentile believers as the Scriptures teach (there is no Jew, no Greek..Gal. 3:27-29).
Why did, and why does God use the Jews and Israel, and why is Israel as a nation used separately from the Christian church? Only for one reason, to show the world exactly who He is by plotting their course and choosing to save who He wants to save at the end of the age. God didn't choose Israel because they are good or special. He made them special to Him to show the world His unique goodness.
Jesus is the King of Israel, the true Israel is the Body of Christ, the church, the ethic Jew can only find the Kingdom in Jesus Christ. Viva Cristo Rey!
“Why didn’t the disciples know that Jesus could feed the 4,000 after he had fed the 5,000 in the previous chapter?” Matt 15:33 (KJV) The so called “Christian” leaders of today teach that it is because they didn’t have faith. But the fact is that anyone involved in such a miracle and still skeptical would not only remember it but would be anxious for a similar situation to arise and prove it one way or the other. The discrepancy is put there to prod those with eyes to see (those sincere in search of truth) to investigate. The answer is given in the 16th chapter where Jesus speaks of the leaven of the Pharisees. Matt 16:6-12 (KJV). If that bread were literal then the disciples had every reason to believe that Jesus was being literal about the leaven and he therefore had no reason to chide them. But that bread being symbolic he chided them for not considering and taking to heart his teachings even after the third time of bringing up the subject. That teaching is what you are reading now. The bible (KJV) says that Jesus followed no will of his own but the will of God. John 6:38 (KJV) His life in the flesh is an ensample (representation) of God's laws. Jesus says that bread represents his flesh (his life) which in turn represents God's law (the bread of life). John 6:51 (KJV) Jesus’ death gave us the New Testament. Matt 26:28 (KJV) and Heb 9:16 (KJV) The New Testament brings meat to the scriptures, represented by the two fishes. The meat is the symbolic code and patterns that bring/bind all scripture in the bible (KJV) together. Heb 5:12-14 (KJV) It has been 2 thousand years since Jesus, so each fish represents 1 thousand years. In turn the five loaves of bread represent 5 thousand years that God gave his laws to man. 21 And they that had eaten were about FIVE THOUSAND men,…Matt 14:21 (KJV) This gives us a glimpse of Gods timeline. 7 thousand years ago Adam was kicked out of the garden. It also shows us that we are at the end of our time on this earth; 13 … and in the earthquake were slain of men SEVEN THOUSAND: and the remnant were affrighted, and gave glory to the God of heaven. Rev 11:13 (KJV) What does all this prove? It proves that the stories in the bible (KJV) aren’t meant to be taken literally. Also different parts of the hidden truths and patterns are written by different authors hundreds and thousands of years apart show that the bible (KJV) is the preserved word of God orchestrated, compiled, and translated by him and the Holy Ghost. It tells us that the bible speaks of itself and that it is for OUR admonition. 4 Neither give heed to FABLES and ENDLESS GENEALOGIES…1 Tim 1:4 (KJV) It tells us its message is hidden in the fables, parables, and stories through symbolism. And above all it gives us a major key in unlocking the hidden timeline and agenda of God. It tells us that the following verse is meant to be taken as literal. 2 Peter 3:8 (KJV) So taking 2 Peter 3:8 (KJV) as literal tells us that each creation day is 1k years. 5 .... And the evening and the morning were the first day. Gen 1:5 (KJV) Another thing that shows the creation days are 1k yrs. is if you take the phrase “the evening and the morning” and do a search verbatim of the whole bible (KJV) the only verse that comes up other than the creation days is Dan 8:26 (KJV) There is no way the events of the vision it speaks of could happen in one 24 hour period. All glory to God. Amen
![The Errors of Dispensationalism [Scriptum #4.3]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/0K1D5bvI3Wc/mqdefault.jpg)
The problem I still have with this explanation is that, the Bible and the New Testament describes that there is neither Jew nor Greek. Therefore, there is no longer a separation, and I believe there was never a separation, even in the old testament between those who truly believed and had faith and trust in Jesus Christ. The Bible says, that they will be drafted back in to the vine. The vine is not a Jew, the vine is Jesus Christ. How can a vine have different branches if it is not of the same vine? I believe Israel has a place but, it is a long side and not separated from those who believed in Jesus Christ, and along with that belief received the promises. The Bible says, that just because you are a Jew by birth does not mean that you are a Jew by the circumcision of the heart.
Absolutely! ✔️
❤ Was a member at JMAC’s church and worked security. Dispensationalism is poison. MacArthur is still confused.
Here is some helpful truth about Israel:
ruclips.net/video/zN5lvSoICOI/видео.html
💯💯💯 In this video Dr. MacArthur says the church could not fulfill the promises to Israel. True. Jesus Christ fulfilled the promises to Israel. Ps 24 makes it clear, This is Jacob, the Generation that seeks the Face of God. Jesus is the better Jacob, and we follow Him.
@@embuchanyes sir, Jesus is the true Son, Jesus is the real templs that the nations now look to and through him they can be blessed, Jesus is not just a king,prophet and priest. He is more than that. Amen to your comment
You stated, "How can a vine have different branches if it is not of the same vine?" I'm assuming that you're ignoring what is in the text 11:17-21 because the answer is in the text. There are BOTH natural branches and WILD branches. A "wild olive" cannot not become a "natural olive" just because of grafting, it maintains its "wild" nature even though it is nourished by the "natural" branch. Both "natural" and "wild" are BOTH holy. And there are dire consequences if the "wild" boasts against the "natural". And while we're on the subject, you might want to revisit your "... there is neither Jew nor Greek" statement because you have left off parts of the text. Are you a man or a woman? Are you bond or free? Those are part of Galatians 3:28-29 as well. I don't think you're grasping the depth of what's going on.
Amen! Good job!!
Who is now the King of Israel in John 1:49? Is the King of Israel now the Head of the Church, and are we His Body? Why did God allow the Romans to destroy the Old Covenant temple and the Old Covenant city, about 40 years after His Son fulfilled the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34 in blood at Calvary?
Once a person comes to understand the New Covenant promised to Israel and Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-34, which is found fulfilled by Christ during the first century in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 10:16-18, and specifically applied to the Church in 2 Corinthians 3:6-8, and Hebrews 12:22-24, man-made Bible doctrines fall apart.
Let us now learn to preach the whole Gospel until He comes back. The King of Israel is risen from the dead! (John 1:49, Acts 2:36)
We are not come to Mount Sinai in Hebrews 12:18. We are come instead to the New Covenant church of Mount Zion and the blood in Hebrews 12:22-24.
================
Who is really teaching “Replacement Theology” ?
(Did God fulfill His promises to the Jewish people at Calvary? Matthew 26:28, John 19:30)
The advocates of modern Dispensational Theology often accuse others of promoting “Replacement Theology”, or some may even say “Antisemitism”. What does the Bible say about their accusations?
1. Who is replacing Christ as the seed of Abraham through which all the families of the Earth would be blessed in Genesis 12:3, with Abraham’s modern descendants? (See Paul’s interpretation in Galatians 3:8, 3:16.)
2. Who is replacing the one people of God in John 10:16, with two peoples of God ?
3. Who is replacing the one seed (Christ) in Galatians 3:16, with the many seeds?
4. Who is replacing the children of the promise in Romans 9:8, with the children of the flesh?
5. Who is replacing the faithful “remnant” of Israelites in Romans 11:1-5, with the Baal worshipers?
6. Who is replacing the word "so" in Romans 11:26, with the word "then"?
7. Who is attempting to replace the Church made up of all races of people, with one made up only of Gentiles? Why did Peter address the crowd as “all the house of Israel” in Acts 2:36, when about 3,000 Israelites accepted Christ on the Day of Pentecost?
8. Based on Hebrews 9:15, the New Covenant cannot be separated from the Messiah’s death. Is the covenant in Daniel 9:27 connected to the Messiah’s death in Daniel 9:26. Is the covenant with the “many” in Daniel 9:27 the same covenant with the “many” in Matthew 26:28? If it is, some have replaced the New Covenant in Daniel 9:27 with a future covenant made by an antichrist not found in Daniel chapter 9. (See the 1599 Geneva Bible used by the Pilgrims.)
9. Those promoting the Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology often accuse others of teaching “Replacement Theology”, but are they the masters of it? Are they promoting a form of Dual Covenant Theology based on race? (See “genealogies” in Titus 3:9) Is the most important genealogy in the Bible found in Matthew 1:1? Is God's Son the ultimate fulfillment of Israel? Why has the modern Church done a pitiful job of sharing the Gospel with modern Orthodox Jews? Why would someone tell them they are God's chosen people and then fail to share the Gospel with them? Who is the seed of the woman promised in Genesis 3:15? Who is the "son" in Psalm 2? Who is the "suffering servant" of Isaiah 53? Who would fulfill the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34? Who would fulfill the timeline of Daniel chapter 9 before the second temple was destroyed? Why have we not heard this simple Old Testament Gospel preached on Christian television in the United States on a regular basis?
10. Watch the RUclips video “Genesis of Dispensational Theology” to see the origin of this man-made doctrine, which is less than 200 years old. It was brought to the United States about the time of the Civil War by John Nelson Darby. The doctrine was later incorporated into the notes of the Scofield Reference Bible, and then spread through much of the modern Church.
Dallas Theological Seminary in Dallas Texas was created in part to promote John Darby’s Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology.
Lewis Sperry Chafer, the first president of Dallas Theological, had the following to say about the difference between Israel and the Church:
“The dispensationalist believes that throughout the ages God is pursuing two distinct purposes: one related to the earth with earthly people and earthly objectives involved which is Judaism; while the other is related to heaven with heavenly people and heavenly objectives involved, which is Christianity.”
Lewis Sperry Chafer, Dispensationalism (Dallas, Seminary Press, 1936), p. 107.
Chafer states that, ‘Israel is an eternal nation, heir to an eternal land, with an eternal kingdom, on which David rules from an eternal throne,’ that is, on earth and distinct from the church who will be in heaven.”
Lewis Sperry Chafer. Systematic Theology. 1975. Vol. IV. pp. 315-323.
John Walvoord, another prominent voice of Dallas Theological stated…
"...it is an article of normative dispensational belief that the boundaries of the land promised to Abraham and his descendants from the Nile to the Euphrates will be literally instituted and that Jesus Christ will return to a literal and theocratic Jewish kingdom centred on a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem. In such a scheme the Church on earth is relegated to the status of a parenthesis.”
John F. Walvoord, The Rapture Question.1979, p. 25
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Are there two peoples of God in John 10:16? (See also 1 John 2:22-23, 2 John 1:7-11.)
What is the land promise to the Old Testament Saints in Hebrews 11:15-16?
(See what Joshua said about the Old Covenant land promise in Josh. 21:43.)
Based on 2 Peter 3:10-13, is this earth “eternal”? Will it be replaced by a new earth?
Based on Acts 2:36, and Romans 9:6-8, and Romans 11:1-5, and Hebrews 12:22-24, and James 1:1-3, can faithful Israel and the Church be separated into two different groups?
Who is the New Covenant promised to in Jeremiah 31:31-34, and is it fulfilled by the blood of Christ at Calvary in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 12:18-24?
Will modern Orthodox Jews ever be saved outside of the New Covenant Church, if the New Covenant is “everlasting” in Hebrews 13:20? (See also 2 Thess. 1:7-10) If the New Covenant has made the Old Covenant “obsolete” in Hebrews 8:6-13, why would God go back to the Old Covenant system during a future time period?
Read the recent book "The Rise and Fall of Dispensationalism", by Daniel G. Hummel.
What about the dispensation of the grace of God that Jesus gave to Paul for us?
-Ephesians 3
In Ephesians 3 it LITERALLY says we are ONE BODY.
This mystery is that through the gospel the Gentiles are heirs together with Israel, members together of one body, and sharers together in the promise in Christ Jesus.
What percentage of ethnic Jewish do you need to be to receive the promises specific to the Jews?
Paul in Romans 9 speaks of the children of promise he says that spiritual Israel are not those that are Israel by birth but they are Israel through belief
Was dispensationalism the reason that Martin Luther took the plan of salvation out of Acts ch.2:38 and moved it to Rom.ch.10:9,10 ?
A couple things -- dispensationalism didn't exist in the days of Martin Luther. Also, Martin Luther did not "move" God's plan of salvation.
The Reformers simply rejected the doctrines of "cooperation with grace" and believed salvation was as defined biblically - by grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone, based on Scripture alone, for the glory of God alone.
Acts 2:38 records the first instruction given as to the biblical response to grace, that being repentance and baptism. Hope this helps.
I like how he says that the beatings and curses are for Israel literally but when it comes to the blesssings then we say that’s that’s for the church. For example the new hearth, but I have heard him preach on Jhon 3 and say to the audience that if you’re not born again, if you don’t have a change of hearth then you can not enter the kingdom. So now he gets to misinterpret and apply the passage how he wants hmmmmm
There was sarcasm involved here, and it was not a doctrinal statement.
Worst thing said here was that quote from Dr. Feinberg (spelling?). He said, "....but the Gentile church gets all the blessing." Ummmmmmmmm there's no such thing as a "the Gentile church"......... There's the church, which is for everyone, as evidenced by, say, the fact that 100% of the Apostles of the church were full blown Jews? By sayyyyyy Jesus commanding to take the gospel to "JUDEA, Samaria, and the ends of the earth." What the heck are we even talking about "Gentile church" vs Jews? What is going on?
What's going on is that scholars recognize what went on in Acts 15 and it's not proper to compel Gentiles to become Judaized. Dr. Charles F. Feinberg is a converted Jew by the way and a Pre-Millennial one at that. I have a few of his books.
There is no earthly promise left to be fulfilled for national Israel. All earthly promise God gave to them fulfilled when God brought them out of Egypt and gave them the land of Palestine. All subsequent promises are spiritual promises which fulfilled in Christ in the New Covenant. Now there is only one Body (Eph. 3:5; 4:4), comprise of Jews and Gentile believers as the Scriptures teach (there is no Jew, no Greek..Gal. 3:27-29).
Why did, and why does God use the Jews and Israel, and why is Israel as a nation used separately from the Christian church? Only for one reason, to show the world exactly who He is by plotting their course and choosing to save who He wants to save at the end of the age. God didn't choose Israel because they are good or special. He made them special to Him to show the world His unique goodness.
Folks might be more willing to understand that is the did a study on "name's sake" by looking up all of the references.
Jesus is the King of Israel, the true Israel is the Body of Christ, the church, the ethic Jew can only find the Kingdom in Jesus
Christ. Viva Cristo
Rey!
“Why didn’t the disciples know that Jesus could feed the 4,000 after he had fed the 5,000 in the previous chapter?” Matt 15:33 (KJV)
The so called “Christian” leaders of today teach that it is because they didn’t have faith. But the fact is that anyone involved in such a miracle and still skeptical would not only remember it but would be anxious for a similar situation to arise and prove it one way or the other. The discrepancy is put there to prod those with eyes to see (those sincere in search of truth) to investigate.
The answer is given in the 16th chapter where Jesus speaks of the leaven of the Pharisees.
Matt 16:6-12 (KJV).
If that bread were literal then the disciples had every reason to believe that Jesus was being literal about the leaven and he therefore had no reason to chide them. But that bread being symbolic he chided them for not considering and taking to heart his teachings even after the third time of bringing up the subject. That teaching is what you are reading now.
The bible (KJV) says that Jesus followed no will of his own but the will of God.
John 6:38 (KJV)
His life in the flesh is an ensample (representation) of God's laws. Jesus says that bread represents his flesh (his life) which in turn represents God's law (the bread of life).
John 6:51 (KJV)
Jesus’ death gave us the New Testament. Matt 26:28 (KJV) and Heb 9:16 (KJV)
The New Testament brings meat to the scriptures, represented by the two fishes.
The meat is the symbolic code and patterns that bring/bind all scripture in the bible (KJV) together. Heb 5:12-14 (KJV)
It has been 2 thousand years since Jesus, so each fish represents 1 thousand years. In turn the five loaves of bread represent 5 thousand years that God gave his laws to man.
21 And they that had eaten were about FIVE THOUSAND men,…Matt 14:21 (KJV)
This gives us a glimpse of Gods timeline. 7 thousand years ago Adam was kicked out of the garden. It also shows us that we are at the end of our time on this earth;
13 … and in the earthquake were slain of men SEVEN THOUSAND: and the remnant were affrighted, and gave glory to the God of heaven. Rev 11:13 (KJV)
What does all this prove? It proves that the stories in the bible (KJV) aren’t meant to be taken literally. Also different parts of the hidden truths and patterns are written by different authors hundreds and thousands of years apart show that the bible (KJV) is the preserved word of God orchestrated, compiled, and translated by him and the Holy Ghost.
It tells us that the bible speaks of itself and that it is for OUR admonition.
4 Neither give heed to FABLES and ENDLESS GENEALOGIES…1 Tim 1:4 (KJV)
It tells us its message is hidden in the fables, parables, and stories through symbolism.
And above all it gives us a major key in unlocking the hidden timeline and agenda of God. It tells us that the following verse is meant to be taken as literal. 2 Peter 3:8 (KJV)
So taking 2 Peter 3:8 (KJV) as literal tells us that each creation day is 1k years.
5 .... And the evening and the morning were the first day. Gen 1:5 (KJV)
Another thing that shows the creation days are 1k yrs. is if you take the phrase “the evening and the morning” and do a search verbatim of the whole bible (KJV) the only verse that comes up other than the creation days is Dan 8:26 (KJV) There is no way the events of the vision it speaks of could happen in one 24 hour period.
All glory to God. Amen
Tragically, dispensationalism is rapidly becoming the greatest and most subtle deception of our time. ✔️
It's actually a minority view when compared to Amillennialism and Post-Millennial theologies.
So did Calvinism 😂