Moving the magnifier will change Point of Impact?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 2 окт 2024
  • In this video we answer a simple question - will moving your magnifier change the point of impact?
    The thing is that you can change the point of impact by looking through your optic from a different angle - this happens because of parallax. And yes, reddots also have a noticeable parallax despite the manufacturers claims of being parallax-free.
    It seems that moving a magnifier doesn't change the angle of view through the reddot enough to cause a parallax and shift of point of impact.
    I would say that's good result.
    Now you know that a shifting magnifier will not affect the accuracy of your zeroed rifle.
    Official Store: polenartactica...
    Patreon: / polenartactical
    Instagram: / polenartactical
    Sellier&Bellot is one of the oldest ammo manufacturers in Europe. They produce high quality ammunition and we are proud to have them as a main sponsor for this channel.
    FB: / sellierbellotammunition
    IG: / sellier_bellot_official

Комментарии •

  • @ArmsForThought
    @ArmsForThought 11 месяцев назад +144

    My understanding is that the magnifier moving would change POI if there was bad paralax on the red dot. Just like moving your head around would change the impact. You could likely test this with a pistol red dot or early gen MRO or something that has bad paralax. If you use an optic with little or no paralax there should be no change. Easier to see the POI change at distance.

    • @PolenarTactical
      @PolenarTactical  11 месяцев назад +40

      Most modern reddots have parallax - it's minimal but it is there. Short and small body optics have a way worse parallax but even for those you have to move your head a couple of inches out of a normal aiming line to get a noticeable POI because of the parallax

    • @картошка-т5э
      @картошка-т5э 11 месяцев назад

      even late gen MROs have the same issue, the MRO HD doesn't though

    • @DTex.45ACP
      @DTex.45ACP 11 месяцев назад +2

      T-REX did a video a few days ago that slows parallax patterns for a bunch of red dots. Good stuff.

    • @therogers4432
      @therogers4432 11 месяцев назад

      ​​@@DTex.45ACPI've never watched T-REX's content, but I'm heading there right now to check this video out 🙂👍
      Also, as a Site Engineer and Land Surveyor for 25yrs using Leica Theodolites/EDMs up to 32x magnification (which utilise a cross-hair reticle very similar in design, principle and use) to a very high standard of accuracy indeed (easily inside the top 0.5% of my Industry, but I was trained by Andy Wetheralt, the Engineer who made the two ends of the Channel Tunnel between England and France meet-up with an "error" of only 240mm over 29.5km... 😳 With no Line-Of-Sight until that French guy ceremonially busted-through the last 50mm/2" of rock with a hammer and chisel... 😯) over distances up to 1000m (which I achieved by taking a minimum of 5 "shots" per target and then averaging-out those 5 readings, ie using the shooting techniques taught to me by the British Army as a young man to achieve significantly greater accuracy in my work, unlike my peers...), as long as the Parallax Error is 100% eliminated at the cross-hairs then varying the magnification should *theoretically* have zero effect on the POA unless caused by heat-shimmer or atmospheric conditions over longer distances 😁👍
      But as a 'Subject', rather than a Citizen 🙄, of the UK, I can only apply those shooting techniques to

  • @Hoplopfheil
    @Hoplopfheil 11 месяцев назад +49

    This concern comes up all the time in conversations about magnifiers. I've never been able to reproduce the issue, using modern, quality red dots like the Aimpoint T2, MRO HD, or SIG Romeo 4/8. I wonder if it's an old problem from dots like the Aimpoint T1 that had really bad parallax.

    • @PolenarTactical
      @PolenarTactical  11 месяцев назад +24

      If you're talking about the shift of POI while using a reddot with or without the magnifier, that can happen for a couple of reasons that i have seen.
      First one that i suspect is very common is astigmatism. It distorts your image of the dot but a magnifier corrects it to some degree giving you a better, clearly defined aiming point.
      So for example if you zero with a magnifier and then shoot for groupings without it, there can be a noticable POI shift.
      That happened to me and the shift went away when i shot the same rifle/dot combo with correction lenses.

    • @DZ4295DBW
      @DZ4295DBW 10 месяцев назад

      ​@@PolenarTacticalI just use the center of the blob lol. However my astigmatism is mitigated with proper hydration for the most part.

  • @DagaYute
    @DagaYute 11 месяцев назад +37

    I've always thought any deviation between my magnifier and RDS is because I can aim more consistently/accurately with the magnifier than without. Thanks for confirming it.

    • @PolenarTactical
      @PolenarTactical  11 месяцев назад +30

      If the grouping only spreads or tightens, then it's aiming more consistently. But if you have an actual POI change, then there can be a couple of reasons. One could be astigmatism as viewing the reddot directly will cause it to distort but a magnified optic will correct that distortion to some degree, that's why people also see the dots more clearly/less fuzzy through the magnifiers

    • @drumlessreggaesongs
      @drumlessreggaesongs 11 месяцев назад +2

      ​@@PolenarTacticalI swear, I read "reddot" as Reddit lol

    • @DagaYute
      @DagaYute 11 месяцев назад +5

      @@PolenarTactical Thank you - I have astigmatism so this makes a lot of sense.

    • @PolenarTactical
      @PolenarTactical  11 месяцев назад +11

      ​@@DagaYuteyeah, me too, i'm speaking from experience 😆

    • @ArsonalTech
      @ArsonalTech 11 месяцев назад +1

      Or get a prismatic sight. I have astigmatism and use the Primary Arms SLx 1x MicroPrism. It has an amazing reticle. MSRP is $270 but can be had for less. Really an excellent deal. The ACSS reticle takes some getting used to, but once you’ve practiced (as you should with everything) it’s phenomenal.

  • @mat3716
    @mat3716 11 месяцев назад +12

    But what effect will A.I. have on point of impact?

    • @PolenarTactical
      @PolenarTactical  11 месяцев назад +13

      It will make it in a shape of boobs

    • @erwannq
      @erwannq 11 месяцев назад +2

      ​@@PolenarTacticalI bow before our new AI overlords. Mankind simply can't compete.

  • @eyesnearstactical
    @eyesnearstactical 11 месяцев назад +1

    Very educational my man! I definitely learned something new today.
    I’m tapping in from San Diego, California!
    I subscribed! 👍🏾

  • @RichardCranium321
    @RichardCranium321 11 месяцев назад +2

    I took a flat end mill bit and thin neodymium magnet with some JB weld to fix the wobble/moving on one of my cheap magnifiers. It held up until I could afford a better setup - LPVO

  • @Windowlick_
    @Windowlick_ 11 месяцев назад +9

    This is part of the reason why magnifiers are such a nice system. You can take it off and use it for a myriad of things where you don't want to point a rifle at something, and you have almost no problems with zero shift when it's reattached. Trying to look out your apartment window at a cat on the street, but don't want to point a rifle at your neighbors? No problem! Just grab your magnifier.

    • @PolenarTactical
      @PolenarTactical  11 месяцев назад +3

      They really are versatile

    • @Chroma710
      @Chroma710 11 месяцев назад +1

      Yeah! Or you know... pick up a binocular for that exact purpose lol. Or even a camera with good digital zoom.

  • @fratercontenduntocculta8161
    @fratercontenduntocculta8161 11 месяцев назад +10

    I have a Mepro MOR and a Mepro 3x magnifier that I figured this out with. As long as your zero is good on the optic, the magnifier can be moved without fear of zero loss. Love these informational videos you guys make!

  • @mustafasfleas7342
    @mustafasfleas7342 11 месяцев назад

    As one with near vision that is no where what it once was... I recommend you investigate low power reading glasses or visit your optometrist for a recommendation as to the very least amount of "correction" that will allow you to see the reticule and target with the best clarity possible.

  • @themoss7115
    @themoss7115 11 месяцев назад +6

    Magnifier does add some parallax to the system. But magnifiers are only 3x, dots are relatively big and such small movements are not a big issue. However, those turrets on magnifiers are there for a reason. Magnifiers do need to be zeroed (or at least checked if they have the same point of impact as your red dot). Some combinations of magnifiers, red dots and mounts can have some POI shift.

  • @saccaed
    @saccaed 11 месяцев назад

    In line with my observations as well. Tried a magnifier with both a red dot and prism without any impact shift noticed.

  • @patrickoneill6821
    @patrickoneill6821 11 месяцев назад

    Nice Helikon Tex runners jacket, love mine!

  • @ABowlofPho
    @ABowlofPho 11 месяцев назад +5

    What you demonstrated was something I noticed when trying to shoot with a magnifier and switching from a normal 1x dot to a magnified view. I always end up turning down the brightness of my dot whenever I have the magnifier in position because it was ever so slightly bloom and the brightness is overexaggerated now, turn the brightness down and then it's still bright but the dot now appears more precise/"small" without the blooming.

  • @grzempek
    @grzempek 11 месяцев назад

    Thanks for explanation. One thought: if the magnifier has such loose by design...its not good magnifier.

  • @robertjensen1438
    @robertjensen1438 11 месяцев назад +2

    Just a comment for the algorithm.

  • @coreywold669
    @coreywold669 11 месяцев назад +20

    This guys voice is addicting to listen to lol.

    • @PolenarTactical
      @PolenarTactical  11 месяцев назад +8

      never heard this one before but i'll take it 😀

    • @Shimitzu
      @Shimitzu 11 месяцев назад +1

      What about having the eye out of eye relief range? I have my magnifier far back, but still if I don't stick the head close to it to see clearly on the sides i think I miss more than when I focus on the sides and push the head further.

    • @PolenarTactical
      @PolenarTactical  11 месяцев назад

      @@Shimitzu if you put your head further from the magnifier but the image is still centered, that should be ok. There could be an issue/distortion if you move your head out of the normal viewing angle and aim at the corners of the optic

  • @piotrnowak7730
    @piotrnowak7730 11 месяцев назад

    Good to know.

  • @0Asterite0
    @0Asterite0 11 месяцев назад

    Remember kids, "fliers" are just part of the normal group dispersion. Youre just not shooting enough rounds

  • @johnnyharperscoutstable5386
    @johnnyharperscoutstable5386 11 месяцев назад +1

    Depends on where you point it😆🐸🍺🔪🔥

  • @JeffNeelzebub
    @JeffNeelzebub 11 месяцев назад +2

    The Falke B5X looks eerily similar to the Athlon Optics MG51 Midas, so much so that I bet they're manufactured from the same OEM. It has quite clear glass but I do have issues keeping it secured on the rifle. I think it has the same footprint as the EoTech magnifier but I'm not totally sure.

    • @PolenarTactical
      @PolenarTactical  11 месяцев назад +1

      Probably
      I was disappointed in the first gen flip mount because it had too much play but the optics are clear and actually quite good. But i have noticed that it's better to use it with wide lens reddot because the smaller ones will restrict the light and you will get a darker image
      What's the issue with keeping it on the rifle?

    • @JeffNeelzebub
      @JeffNeelzebub 11 месяцев назад

      ​@@PolenarTactical The Athlon has a thumbscrew QD, which tends to get loose under recoil. I see yours has a lever QD, which might work better but the Falke website shows a thumbscrew. If it's compatible with an EOTech mount, that might be a better way to go.

  • @mr.normalguy69
    @mr.normalguy69 11 месяцев назад +1

    Can you try shooting with just night vision and optic risers instead of night vision and laser aiming devices like Peq-15? And tell us how much difference does it make.
    The idea is that, if you can shoot at night with just your night vision and raised optics, then you won't have to pay 800-1000$ for a Peq-15 to be able to shoot accurately at night.

    • @PolenarTactical
      @PolenarTactical  11 месяцев назад +2

      Yes, you can do that, it's called passive aiming. You need a quality optic that has good light and IR transmission and NV settings.
      A high mount helps because you have to be able to look through the optic with your NV device to aim.
      Laser designators are not just for aiming, they usually have IR illuminators on them which helps you see and aim at longer distances with NV devices

    • @Chroma710
      @Chroma710 11 месяцев назад

      You still might need a peq if you go inside a building with no natural light sources, NV requires IR light so an IR illuminator is still necessary.

  • @jameshealy4594
    @jameshealy4594 11 месяцев назад +1

    Hey Ziga and crew, love your style as always. I know you have astigmatism, would you consider a video (or even just a list) of the best dots you've tried for those of us who also struggle? I went to a gun show to try some but it was difficult to get access.
    *side story* At that show as a new shooter I was also trying various magnified optics with a '1x' setting and ended up finding one I really liked, they never have prices so I remember searching google, thinking 'never heard of this kahles' and stumbling away a few minutes later trying not to think about the optic being 4.5x the price of my rifle. 🤣

  • @cjones4018
    @cjones4018 11 месяцев назад

    Great content! Thx

  • @Kaotix_music
    @Kaotix_music 11 месяцев назад

    I never understood the whole "you must zero your magnifier" when I never noticed I had to do that. When I first got a magnifier, I did zero research on them. I zeroed my AR with an Eotech XPS3-0 AND a holosun on two separate occasions because I sometimes switch back and forth always asking myself which I like better. Both times, I zeroed with the magnifier on to just get best group possible and then would remove my magnifier and shoot and my POI was the same. The groups would open up a small bit, but thats because of me...but no POI shift. I once tested this myself switch back to my eotech and I centered my circle/dot in the magnifier, zeroed it, then I completely threw off the center by alot and my POI was the same. I thought because Eotechs have "almost" no parallax, maybe it would change on a red dot? Nope. It didnt. So I think more people need to test with their set ups if POI shifts because people still say today that it does...when ive seen myself in no way does it at all

  • @alecubudulecu
    @alecubudulecu 11 месяцев назад

    Magnifier POI comes into play only as far as parallax goes. For distances of 3x or 5x that one would be shooting with a magnifier …. Not really gonna notice. It’s the kinda thing that would mean 1/2 inch at 100 yards. Nothing you can see with that magnification. Let alone blame the rifle or optic on.

  • @Zn0nimus
    @Zn0nimus 11 месяцев назад

    I'm sorry, but the first 3 seconds of the video I was like.... Zelensky?! I'm sorry. :(

  • @LosRiji
    @LosRiji 11 месяцев назад

    Are these your administrative results?

  • @lowkey1969
    @lowkey1969 11 месяцев назад

    So, now that you have more experience with the AR platform, how do you feel it compares with the AK?

  • @davedaniel5788
    @davedaniel5788 11 месяцев назад +5

    Zelensky out here teaching us about magnifiers👏

  • @onpsxmember
    @onpsxmember 11 месяцев назад

    5 shots aren't a group and everything one doesn't like is a flyer. Just toss out that mount or the whole magnifier. Gather more data, keep other variables constant. Why not talk to an optician that is also shares our interests?

  • @runem5429
    @runem5429 11 месяцев назад +1

    It seems that it is kindof obvious it wont make a difference as long as the red dot stays on target, "holographically", even if you're not looking only through the center of the optic, then it will also do that with anything you do behind the optic - it's just how physics works. But, don't put a magnifier in front of the sight, though, that would be a recipe for disaster..

    • @PolenarTactical
      @PolenarTactical  11 месяцев назад +4

      Most reddots have different amounts of parallax and moving the magnifier behind the optic will change the aiming/viewing angle but it seems that not enough to make a difference

    • @runem5429
      @runem5429 11 месяцев назад +1

      @@PolenarTactical quality matters eh.
      So, then it's good to have the conclusion that within the degree you'd actually offset the magnifier in practice it doesn't matter much 🙂
      I'd love to see it demonstrated in a video. I imagine filming through the lens on a few different red dot sights, each one strapped down and zeroed on a target at some well thought-out range, and then moving the camera to see how much the dot is off with each fraction it moves towards the edge of the fov. Like 1/3, 2/3 and right on the edge, say.

  • @arha-z1v
    @arha-z1v 11 месяцев назад

    "flyers" in sponsored munitions? impossible!

  • @Custompro36610
    @Custompro36610 11 месяцев назад

    You don't upload so many videos anymore friend......😥. We hope you get the hang of it 🔋

    • @PolenarTactical
      @PolenarTactical  11 месяцев назад

      Check out channel, we upload almost every week. RUclips probably doesnt show our new uploads - a lot of our subscribers have told us about this issue :/

  • @jlew6890
    @jlew6890 11 месяцев назад

    S&B! 🙌🏻

  • @georgearevalo4778
    @georgearevalo4778 11 месяцев назад

    With a cheap magnifier like that it’ll shift 😅

  • @Broman-es4sx
    @Broman-es4sx 11 месяцев назад

    Everyone: nooo you have to buy the kaot expensive ooptics on your gun. If it doesnt cost the same as the gun, then it not worth it.
    Actual expensive optics :
    *Falls apart graciously*

  • @Fiddlefaddle115
    @Fiddlefaddle115 11 месяцев назад

    I just had a pretty well known firearms instructor in the US tell the group that a magnifier could absolutely change your POI. I hadn't tested his claim but I couldn't figure out any reasonable reasons why a shift would occur. Appreciate your video.

  • @licfelipefa5659
    @licfelipefa5659 11 месяцев назад

    Uso pura mira de hierro a 150, 300 y 600mts al igual que 5, 15, 25 y 50mts estos últimos en CQB para reacción ambos en tiro en cubierto siempre bajo cobertura 🇲🇽🧐🤌(cal. Usados 223, 556x39, 556x45 y 762x39

  • @docjamesjdjd
    @docjamesjdjd 11 месяцев назад

    I'm sorry, what kind of 5x magnifier is he running? Bc I'm looking for a budget 5x but that still looks good

    • @PolenarTactical
      @PolenarTactical  11 месяцев назад +1

      Falke 5x
      polenartactical.com/shop/146-magnifers

  • @МаратХасенов-б1с
    @МаратХасенов-б1с 9 месяцев назад

    Use prism optics. It's more solid and compact.

  • @konstantin.v
    @konstantin.v 11 месяцев назад

    Someone who knew *physics* could have told the result without actually trying 😊

  • @nam430
    @nam430 11 месяцев назад +1

    noice

  • @danhanus2294
    @danhanus2294 11 месяцев назад

    I had a magnifier zero shift I couldn't figure out. I finally went from a PA micro dot to an eotech and the zero shift went away.

  • @MyLonewolf25
    @MyLonewolf25 11 месяцев назад

    As long as you’re using the same POA relative to the red dot it -shouldn’t- change poi
    The effect of parallax will magnifies and red dots at the engagement ranges you’d use them at is very minimal
    You just have to remember that the red dot is your poa not the center of the magnifier. The only issue is that the magnifier if of poor quality and or a poor quality red dot may distort the dot

  • @wkkkkkk545
    @wkkkkkk545 11 месяцев назад

    How it looks for people with astigmatism? - i had some issues with red dots- especially cheaper.:(

    • @PolenarTactical
      @PolenarTactical  11 месяцев назад +1

      Magnifiers will help you out - most magnified optics correct for certain amount of astigmatism. You will see the dot clearer and more defined through the magnifier

  • @romazzz93
    @romazzz93 11 месяцев назад

    Now put it in front of reddot

  • @u_solutions_lv
    @u_solutions_lv 11 месяцев назад

    Some put it in front of red dot, and then you have plenty of shift

  • @rmblwgn
    @rmblwgn 11 месяцев назад

    It is somewhat common to see magnifiers sent with screws that are too long. It has nothing to do with Loctite but rather your screws bottoming out in the helicoils because they need to be shorter

  • @DitryDee
    @DitryDee 11 месяцев назад

    this guyyyyyy

  • @FrankHeer_
    @FrankHeer_ 11 месяцев назад

    M4FL?

  • @wizzfred2
    @wizzfred2 11 месяцев назад

    Sorry, but to be complete, in your test , you have to make the same exersice with dot not centered to red dot lense (by exemple in end edge of the lense) ... in order to see if you have an increase of parallax effect. you also know that you can make this exercise without shooting , you place your rifle in bench, and you see if your red dot is moving by moving your head (camera) and by moving magnifier.

    • @KeepTheGates
      @KeepTheGates 11 месяцев назад

      Bullshit. The question was "if your magnifier moves, does your POI shift" which he answered. He moved the magnifier about, POI didn't shift.

  • @currahee556
    @currahee556 11 месяцев назад

    Halloween Ends sucked!

  • @Bob_Lennart
    @Bob_Lennart 11 месяцев назад

    Result is pretty obvious if you think about it. The dot is in the red dot sight. The magnifier just magnifies. It does not move the dot.

    • @PolenarTactical
      @PolenarTactical  11 месяцев назад

      True but every optic has some parallax so if you would move the magnifier to extreme edges of the reddot and thus change the angle of view, it could change the point of impact.
      But that would only happen if you would somehow be able to move the magnifier a couple of inches in each direction outside of a normal aiming angle

  • @wormyboot
    @wormyboot 11 месяцев назад

    Does it matter what kind of threadlocker i use?

    • @PolenarTactical
      @PolenarTactical  11 месяцев назад +1

      I would recommend "blue loctite" - Loctite 243 or some kind of equivalent. It prevents the crews from moving but its still possible to get it apart without heating or other measures.

    • @wormyboot
      @wormyboot 11 месяцев назад

      @@PolenarTactical Thank you!

  • @frankopanklaric
    @frankopanklaric 11 месяцев назад +3

    With that wobble? Not a chance. By that I mean not a chance I would take that falke. If the dot is zeroed. Then impact remains unchanged. Pure logic.

    • @PolenarTactical
      @PolenarTactical  11 месяцев назад +10

      If you didn't watch the video, i have loosened the screws.
      Your pure logic seems to not take into account the possible change of viewing angle that can cause parallax. In this case the movement from side to side is not nearly enough to have an effect but could influence the POI if the magnifier would be shifted to one or another edge of the optic

  • @bitkarek
    @bitkarek 11 месяцев назад

    the more you know...

  • @Mikalcius
    @Mikalcius 11 месяцев назад

    What rifle this is?

  • @pyeitme508
    @pyeitme508 11 месяцев назад

    RAD

  • @4i4kov
    @4i4kov 11 месяцев назад

    I think your friend was more concermed with the thing moving about during his run. Even if it does not change the gun's zero, I can't imagine having the thing move while you are using it would improve run time and accuracy. You are also using a stable shooting platform and are not exhausted from running. I imagine recoil and shooter stability would be far more likely to cause the magnifier to move while you are shooting.

  • @thePrussian
    @thePrussian 11 месяцев назад

    What if you used the magnifier in front of the red dot?

  • @kramdog3000
    @kramdog3000 11 месяцев назад

    Great idea for a test!

  • @EricDaMAJ
    @EricDaMAJ 11 месяцев назад +1

    It’s a rifle with an optimal battlefield engagement range of 300 meters. If your “deviation” can be covered with a quarter (2.7 cm), you may be obsessing.

  • @perfectogaming5240
    @perfectogaming5240 11 месяцев назад

    69gr ftw 👌

  • @ratagris21
    @ratagris21 11 месяцев назад

    Thanks for posting this information Ziga! Excellent presentation and shooting as well. Thanks for all you do! ♠️🎩🎯🎱🇺🇸🏁🇮🇱🇺🇦🔱🌻🌸🏵️💮🌼🏴‍☠️🌄

  • @unityistheonlysolution3485
    @unityistheonlysolution3485 11 месяцев назад

    I run an Eotech w/ a G33 flip mount magnifier on one AR, and a Sig Romeo w/ a Juliet flip mount magnifier on another AR, and I’ve never had an issue with parallax or a change of zero with either of these set ups. Buy good gear, maintain it well - no problems.👍
    - Jason/Freedom Fighter Until Death/Vermont, FRA (‘FRA’, meaning “The Failed Republic Of America”)

  • @depthcharge6215
    @depthcharge6215 11 месяцев назад

    This is one of the reasons why I gave up red dots and gone full LPVO. If you need magnifier with added weight, you might as well jump on the LPVO that has good true 1X.

  • @kajetandziebaj6405
    @kajetandziebaj6405 11 месяцев назад

    any good rifleman will tell you optics only hinder you and the best way to guide your bullets to your target are with willpower alone

  • @Googlencraptubesuckabandonship
    @Googlencraptubesuckabandonship 11 месяцев назад +2

    Hey Polenar, you mentioned your red dot covered the whole center? I know you guys are experts, but i was just checking to see of you lower the brightness till you can barely see the dot before you zero it? I was taught in the service that you should lower it to the lowest setting you can see before you zero because it creates the smallest surface area on the target. If you did already know this, this if for everyone who doesn't. Have a great day! I love everyone!

    • @piotrnowak7730
      @piotrnowak7730 11 месяцев назад +1

      Nice tip, thanks.

    • @PolenarTactical
      @PolenarTactical  11 месяцев назад +3

      I learned the same thing in basic as we were using old Aimpoints with 4MOA dots :D I always use this technique for precision shooting but for filming we have to turn the dot way up so the camera can pick up on it and focus properly

    • @PolenarTactical
      @PolenarTactical  11 месяцев назад +3

      Regarding the video, the 2MOA dot was larger than my aiming dot at 30 meters distance but it also didnt help that the diopter wasn't set properly on the magnifier, made everything a bit harder to see and less in focus

  • @TacticalXmen
    @TacticalXmen 11 месяцев назад

  • @Googlencraptubesuckabandonship
    @Googlencraptubesuckabandonship 11 месяцев назад

    Hey Polenar, you mentioned your red dot covered the whole center? I know you guys are experts, but i was just checking to see of you lower the brightness till you can barely see the dot before you zero it? I was taught in the service that you should lower it to the lowest setting you can see before you zero because it creates the smallest surface area on the target. If you did already know this, this if for everyone who doesn't. Have a great day! I love everyone!